Journal articles on the topic 'Task-switching'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Task-switching.

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Task-switching.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Chao, Naipeng, Cheng Wang, and Yi Li. "Task Switching in Online Multitasking Behaviors." Journal of Advances in Computer Networks 4, no. 1 (2016): 75–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.18178/jacn.2016.4.1.207.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Monsell, Stephen. "Task switching." Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7, no. 3 (March 2003): 134–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00028-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Schmitz, Florian, and Andreas Voss. "Components of task switching: A closer look at task switching and cue switching." Acta Psychologica 151 (September 2014): 184–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.06.009.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Rahamim, Ofer, Yoav Bar-Anan, Golan Shahar, and Nachshon Meiran. "Task-Switching Methodology." Zeitschrift für Psychologie 221, no. 1 (January 2013): 15–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000126.

Full text
Abstract:
In this paper, the authors review studies involving switching between an evaluative task and a nonevaluative task as a means to indirectly assess evaluative processes in the context of research of attitudes, psychopathology, and personality traits. Two task-switching indices, Switching Cost and Task Rule Congruency Effect, which represent two distinct sets of processes, have been used so far and can be assessed simultaneously. The authors suggest that using task-switching methodology as a platform provides significant methodological as well as theoretical advantages, which they attribute to the heightened involvement of the individual’s goal system, characterizing the task-switching paradigm.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Liefooghe, Baptist. "Joint task switching." Journal of Cognitive Psychology 28, no. 1 (September 24, 2015): 60–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2015.1084311.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

McDonald, Joseph D., Leslie A. DeChurch, Raquel Asencio, Dorothy R. Carter, Jessica R. Mesmer-Magnus, and Noshir S. Contractor. "Team Task Switching." Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 59, no. 1 (September 2015): 1157–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1541931215591179.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Altmann, Erik M. "Task switching is not cue switching." Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13, no. 6 (December 2006): 1016–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/bf03213918.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Koch, Iring. "Sequential task predictability in task switching." Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12, no. 1 (February 2005): 107–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/bf03196354.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Dreisbach, Gesine, Thomas Goschke, and Hilde Haider. "Implicit task sets in task switching?" Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 32, no. 6 (2006): 1221–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1221.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Gade, Miriam, and Iring Koch. "Cue–task associations in task switching." Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 60, no. 6 (June 2007): 762–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470210701268005.

Full text
Abstract:
Cognitive flexibility can be studied using the task-switching paradigm. This paradigm requires subjects to adapt behaviour to changing contexts as indicated by a cue. In our study, we addressed the question of how cue-based implementation of mental “task sets” occurs. We assumed that cues build up associations to the tasks that they indicate. These associations lead to retrieval of the associated task set once the cue shows up again. In three experiments, we tested this assumption using a negative transfer paradigm. First participants were exposed to one cue–task mapping. After a training phase, the cue–task mapping changed in either of two ways. Whereas one group of participants got new cues, the other experienced a reversal of the learnt cue–task mapping. Our results show that participants build up cue–task associations and that these formerly learnt associations can hamper the implementation of new cue–task mappings (particular with mapping reversal). Prolonged preparation time decreased the cost of changing the cue–task mapping but did not change the overall pattern of results.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Braverman, Ami, and Nachshon Meiran. "Task conflict effect in task switching." Psychological Research 74, no. 6 (March 23, 2010): 568–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-010-0279-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Fröber, Kerstin, and Gesine Dreisbach. "Keep flexible – Keep switching! The influence of forced task switching on voluntary task switching." Cognition 162 (May 2017): 48–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.024.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Philipp, Andrea M., and Iring Koch. "Task inhibition and task repetition in task switching." European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 18, no. 4 (July 2006): 624–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09541440500423269.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

VANDIERENDONCK, A., E. CHRISTIAENS, and B. LIEFOOGHE. "On the representation of task information in task switching: Evidence from task and dimension switching." Memory & Cognition 36, no. 7 (October 1, 2008): 1248–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/mc.36.7.1248.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Pohl, Patricia S., Joan M. McDowd, Diane Filion, Lorie G. Richards, William Stiers, and Patricia Kluding. "Task Switching After Stroke." Physical Therapy 87, no. 1 (January 1, 2007): 66–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20060093.

Full text
Abstract:
Background and Purpose Task switching is a cognitive skill that may be compromised after brain damage. The purposes of this study were to examine task-switching abilities in the subacute phase after stroke, to determine whether a switching task under endogenous or internal control is more difficult than a switching task under exogenous or cued control, and to determine whether deficits in switching attenuate in the first few months after stroke. Subjects The participants in this study were 46 adults with stroke and 38 adults without stroke. Methods Subjects performed 2 computer-based switching tasks, an alternating task that relied on endogenous control and a cued task that relied on exogenous control. Testing was done in subjects’ homes at 1 and 3 months after stroke and at a 2-month interval for control subjects. Switch costs, or the difference between the no-switch condition and the switch condition, were calculated for accuracy and response time. Results Subjects in the stroke group had higher switch costs for accuracy than did subjects in the control group. The alternating task was more difficult than the cued task, with higher switch costs for accuracy and response time. The alternating task was particularly difficult for subjects in the stroke group, with high switch costs for accuracy. Both groups showed decreased response time switch costs at the second testing session. Discussion and Conclusion Task switching, particularly if under endogenous control, is impaired in adults in the subacute phase after stroke. Clinicians should be aware of performance deficits that may relate to task switching.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

BARTON, JASON J. S., MARIYA V. CHERKASOVA, KRISTEN LINDGREN, DONALD C. GOFF, JAMES M. INTRILIGATOR, and DARA S. MANOACH. "Antisaccades and Task Switching." Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 956, no. 1 (April 2002): 250–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb02824.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Braem, Senne. "Conditioning task switching behavior." Cognition 166 (September 2017): 272–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.037.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

BRYCK, R. L., and U. MAYR. "Task selection cost asymmetry without task switching." Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15, no. 1 (February 1, 2008): 128–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/pbr.15.1.128.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Schneider, Darryl W., and Gordon D. Logan. "Task switching versus cue switching: Using transition cuing to disentangle sequential effects in task-switching performance." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 33, no. 2 (2007): 370–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.370.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Frick, Aurélien, Maria A. Brandimonte, and Nicolas Chevalier. "Voluntary task switching in children: Switching more reduces the cost of task selection." Developmental Psychology 55, no. 8 (August 2019): 1615–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/dev0000757.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Mooney, Skyler J., David C. S. Filice, Natasha R. Douglas, and Melissa M. Holmes. "Task specialization and task switching in eusocial mammals." Animal Behaviour 109 (November 2015): 227–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.08.019.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Umemoto, Akina, and Clay B. Holroyd. "Task-specific effects of reward on task switching." Psychological Research 79, no. 4 (July 2, 2014): 698–707. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0595-z.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Hsieh, Shulan, and Hanjung Liu. "Electrophysiological correlates of task conflicts in task-switching." Brain Research 1203 (April 2008): 116–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2008.01.092.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Koch, Iring. "Instruction effects in task switching." Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15, no. 2 (April 2008): 448–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/pbr.15.2.448.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Verbruggen, Frederick, Baptist Liefooghe, and André Vandierendonck. "Selective Stopping in Task Switching." Experimental Psychology 53, no. 1 (January 2006): 48–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.53.1.48.

Full text
Abstract:
Recently, several studies stressed the role of response selection in cued task switching. The present study tried to investigate directly the hypothesis that no switch cost can be found when there was no response selection. In two experiments, we combined a cued task switching paradigm with the selective stopping paradigm. Results of the experiments demonstrated that a switch cost was found when participants selected a response, even without response execution. Alternatively, when the response was inhibited without the need of response selection, no switch cost was found. These results provide direct evidence for the distinct role of response selection in cued task switching and suggest that response execution is not a necessary factor to obtain a switch cost.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Muhmenthaler, Michèle C., and Beat Meier. "Task Switching Hurts Memory Encoding." Experimental Psychology 66, no. 1 (January 2019): 58–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000431.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract. Research consistently shows that task switching slows down performance on switch compared to repeat trials, but the consequences on memory are less clear. In the present study, we investigated the impact of task switching on subsequent memory performance. Participants had to switch between two semantic classification tasks. In Experiment 1, the stimuli were univalent; in Experiment 2, the stimuli were bivalent (relevant for both tasks). The aim was to disentangle the conflicts triggered by task switching and bivalency. In both experiments, recognition memory for switch and repeat stimuli was tested subsequently. During encoding, task switching produced switch costs. Critically, subsequent memory was lower for switch compared to repeat stimuli in both experiments, and this effect was increased in Experiment 2 with bivalent material. We suggest that the requirement to switch tasks hurts the encoding of task-relevant information and thus impairs subsequent memory performance.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Koch, Iring, and Marcel Brass. "Call for Papers: “Task Switching”." Zeitschrift für Psychologie 219, no. 4 (January 2011): 255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000081.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Meiran, Nachshon, Joseph Levine, Naama Meiran, and Avishai Henik. "Task set switching in schizophrenia." Neuropsychology 14, no. 3 (2000): 471–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.14.3.471.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Berger, Andrea, Michelle Sadeh, Gabriel Tzur, Avinoam Shuper, Liora Kornreich, Dov Inbar, Ian J. Cohen, et al. "Task switching after cerebellar damage." Neuropsychology 19, no. 3 (May 2005): 362–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.19.3.362.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Vandierendonck, André. "Executive Functions and Task Switching." Psychologica Belgica 40, no. 4 (January 1, 2000): 211. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/pb.963.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Gaál, Zsófia Anna, and István Czigler. "Task-Switching Training and Transfer." Journal of Psychophysiology 32, no. 3 (July 1, 2018): 106–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803/a000189.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract. We used task-switching (TS) paradigms to study how cognitive training can compensate age-related cognitive decline. Thirty-nine young (age span: 18–25 years) and 40 older (age span: 60–75 years) women were assigned to training and control groups. The training group received 8 one-hour long cognitive training sessions in which the difficulty level of TS was individually adjusted. The other half of the sample did not receive any intervention. The reference task was an informatively cued TS paradigm with nogo stimuli. Performance was measured on reference, near-transfer, and far-transfer tasks by behavioral indicators and event-related potentials (ERPs) before training, 1 month after pretraining, and in case of older adults, 1 year later. The results showed that young adults had better pretraining performance. The reference task was too difficult for older adults to form appropriate representations as indicated by the behavioral data and the lack of P3b components. But after training older adults reached the level of performance of young participants, and accordingly, P3b emerged after both the cue and the target. Training gain was observed also in near-transfer tasks, and partly in far-transfer tasks; working memory and executive functions did not improve, but we found improvement in alerting and orienting networks, and in the execution of variants of TS paradigms. Behavioral and ERP changes remained preserved even after 1 year. These findings suggest that with an appropriate training procedure older adults can reach the level of performance seen in young adults and these changes persist for a long period. The training also affects the unpracticed tasks, but the transfer depends on the extent of task similarities.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Panepinto, Marie P. "Voluntary versus Forced Task Switching." Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 54, no. 4 (September 2010): 453–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154193121005400438.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Wearden, J. H., Susan C. O'Rourke, Claire Matchwick, Zhang Min, and Sharon Maeers. "Task switching and subjective duration." Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 63, no. 3 (March 2010): 531–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470210903024768.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Schuch, Stefanie, and Iring Koch. "Task switching and action sequencing." Psychological Research 70, no. 6 (November 19, 2005): 526–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-005-0014-6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Schneider, Darryl W., and Gordon D. Logan. "The target of task switching." Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale 64, no. 2 (2010): 129–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019598.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Altmann, Erik M. "Advance Preparation in Task Switching." Psychological Science 15, no. 9 (September 2004): 616–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00729.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

T.HARADA, Etsuko, Akinori ASANO, and Satoru SUTO. "Task switching and cognitive aging." Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association 75 (September 15, 2011): 1AM130. http://dx.doi.org/10.4992/pacjpa.75.0_1am130.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Meiran, Nachshon, Ziv Chorev, and Ayelet Sapir. "Component Processes in Task Switching." Cognitive Psychology 41, no. 3 (November 2000): 211–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2000.0736.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Gilbert, Sam J., and Tim Shallice. "Task Switching: A PDP Model." Cognitive Psychology 44, no. 3 (May 2002): 297–337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2001.0770.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Kumada, Takatsune, and Glyn W. Humphreys. "Dimensional weighting and task switching following frontal lobe damage: Fractionating the task switching deficit." Cognitive Neuropsychology 23, no. 3 (May 2006): 424–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02643290542000058.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Sohn, Myeong-Ho, and John R. Anderson. "Task preparation and task repetition: Two-component model of task switching." Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130, no. 4 (2001): 764–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.764.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Mills, M., and M. Dodd. "Visual task-switching: No cost for switching to search." Journal of Vision 13, no. 9 (July 25, 2013): 510. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/13.9.510.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Sdoia, Stefano, and Fabio Ferlazzo. "Stimulus-Related Inhibition of Task Set During Task Switching." Experimental Psychology 55, no. 5 (January 2008): 322–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.55.5.322.

Full text
Abstract:
Performance after a shifting of task is supported by the inhibition of the executed task, as revealed by slower reaction times (RTs) on alternating compared to nonalternating task sequences (ABA vs CBA). In the present study we investigated the role of stimulus processing in the establishment of task inhibition during task switching, irrespective of the response selection process. Comparing performance on AbA and CbA task sequences within a procedure in which the b-task only involved stimulus encoding processes for later comparison but response selection did not occur, we found slower RTs on AbA compared to CbA task sequences. This revealed that inhibition of the executed task can be triggered at the stimulus processing stage of the new task. In accordance, inhibition only emerged when interference between tasks occurred at the stimulus level, due to stimuli having features relevant for both the executed and the upcoming task.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Rubin, Orit, and Iring Koch. "Exogenous Influences on Task Set Activation in Task Switching." Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 59, no. 6 (June 2006): 1033–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02724980543000105.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Yeung, N. "Between-Task Competition and Cognitive Control in Task Switching." Journal of Neuroscience 26, no. 5 (February 1, 2006): 1429–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3109-05.2006.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Poljac, Edita, and Harold Bekkering. "Generic cognitive adaptations to task interference in task switching." Acta Psychologica 132, no. 3 (November 2009): 279–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.07.012.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Sandhu, Raj, and Ben Dyson. "Investigating task and modality switching costs using bimodal stimuli." Seeing and Perceiving 25 (2012): 22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/187847612x646451.

Full text
Abstract:
Investigations of concurrent task and modality switching effects have to date been studied under conditions of uni-modal stimulus presentation. As such, it is difficult to directly compare resultant task and modality switching effects, as the stimuli afford both tasks on each trial, but only one modality. The current study investigated task and modality switching using bi-modal stimulus presentation under various cue conditions: task and modality (double cue), either task or modality (single cue) or no cue. Participants responded to either the identity or the position of an audio–visual stimulus. Switching effects were defined as staying within a modality/task (repetition) or switching into a modality/task (change) from trial n − 1 to trial n, with analysis performed on trial n data. While task and modality switching costs were sub-additive across all conditions replicating previous data, modality switching effects were dependent on the modality being attended, and task switching effects were dependent on the task being performed. Specifically, visual responding and position responding revealed significant costs associated with modality and task switching, while auditory responding and identity responding revealed significant gains associated with modality and task switching. The effects interacted further, revealing that costs and gains associated with task and modality switching varying with the specific combination of modality and task type. The current study reconciles previous data by suggesting that efficiently processed modality/task information benefits from repetition while less efficiently processed information benefits from change due to less interference of preferred processing across consecutive trials.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Seibold, Julia C., Sophie Nolden, Josefa Oberem, Janina Fels, and Iring Koch. "Auditory attention switching and judgment switching: Exploring multicomponent task representations." Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 80, no. 7 (June 29, 2018): 1823–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1557-0.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

Yin, Ming, Yiling Chen, and Yu-An Sun. "Monetary Interventions in Crowdsourcing Task Switching." Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing 2 (September 5, 2014): 234–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1609/hcomp.v2i1.13160.

Full text
Abstract:
With a large amount of tasks of various types, requesters in crowdsourcing platforms often bundle tasks of different types into a single working session. This creates a task switching setting, where workers need to shift between different cognitive tasks. We design and conduct an experiment on Amazon Mechanical Turk to study how occasionally presented performance-contingent monetary rewards, referred as monetary interventions, affect worker performance in the task switching setting. We use two competing metrics to evaluate worker performance. When monetary interventions are placed on some tasks in a working session, our results show that worker performance on these tasks can be improved in both metrics. Moreover, worker performance on other tasks where monetary interventions are not placed is also affected: workers perform better according to one metric, but worse according to the other metric. This suggests that in addition to providing extrinsic monetary incentives for some tasks, monetary interventions implicitly set performance goals for all tasks. Furthermore, monetary interventions are most effective in improving worker performance when used at switch tasks, tasks that follow a task of a different type, in working sessions with a low task switching frequency.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Sohn, Myeong-Ho, and John R. Anderson. "Stimulus-related priming during task switching." Memory & Cognition 31, no. 5 (July 2003): 775–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/bf03196115.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography