Academic literature on the topic 'System-level bureaucracy'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'System-level bureaucracy.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "System-level bureaucracy"
O’Connor, Karl. "What are the ideas and motivations of bureaucrats within a religiously contested society?" International Review of Administrative Sciences 83, no. 1 (July 10, 2016): 63–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0020852315574996.
Full textO’Connor, Karl, Craig Larkin, Mansour Nasasra, and Kelsey Shanks. "School Choice and Conflict Narratives: Representative Bureaucracy at the Street Level in East Jerusalem." Administration & Society 52, no. 4 (May 26, 2019): 528–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0095399719850102.
Full textSiverson, Rolf I. "From Chimera's Womb: The Manchukuo Bureaucracy and Its Legacy in East Asia." International Journal of Asian Studies 17, no. 1 (January 2020): 39–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1479591420000133.
Full textDiana, Bambang Agus. "Pengaruh Politik Dalam Birokrasi Pemerintahan." Ministrate: Jurnal Birokrasi dan Pemerintahan Daerah 2, no. 1 (March 29, 2020): 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.15575/jbpd.v2i1.7585.
Full textIonescu, Luminita. "The Role of Accounting and Internal Control in Reducing Bureaucracy in the Public Sector." Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People 5, no. 4 (December 30, 2016): 46. http://dx.doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v5i4.511.
Full textBrødsgaard, Kjeld Erik. "Institutional Reform and the Bianzhi System in China." China Quarterly 170 (June 2002): 361–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0009443902000232.
Full textŚwiderski, Krzysztof. "Biurokratyczne załatwianie spraw." Studia Prawa Publicznego, no. 1(33) (March 15, 2021): 35–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/spp.2021.1.33.2.
Full textNaim, Sayada Jannatun, and Abu Hena Reza Hasan. "Concentration of Authority and Rent Seeking Behaviour in Bureaucracy: An Evidence of Ineffective Governance in Bangladesh." Journal of Social and Development Sciences 9, no. 1 (April 19, 2018): 19–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.22610/jsds.v9i1.2165.
Full textMousavi, Mohammad. "The Autonomous State in Iran: Mobility and Prosperity in the Reign of Shah 'Abbas the Great (1587-1629)." Iran and the Caucasus 12, no. 1 (2008): 17–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157338408x326172.
Full textHuskey, Eugene. "Vyshinskii, Krylenko, and the Shaping of the Soviet Legal Order." Slavic Review 46, no. 3-4 (1987): 414–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2498095.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "System-level bureaucracy"
Castro, André Luís de. "O fantasma na máquina: relação entre system-level bureaucracy e screen-level bureaucracy na implementação de políticas públicas." reponame:Repositório Institucional do FGV, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10438/18609.
Full textApproved for entry into archive by Maria Tereza Fernandes Conselmo (maria.conselmo@fgv.br) on 2017-08-07T16:59:07Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 TESE - O FANTASMA NA MAQUINA - ANDRE CASTRO - Versao Final - 2017.pdf: 2023758 bytes, checksum: f1d27c99ae1d44a54e033be627f867ba (MD5)
Made available in DSpace on 2017-08-07T17:23:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 TESE - O FANTASMA NA MAQUINA - ANDRE CASTRO - Versao Final - 2017.pdf: 2023758 bytes, checksum: f1d27c99ae1d44a54e033be627f867ba (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-07-11
The increasing complexity of the State, in particular the use of new information and communication technologies have led to the emergence of new types of bureaucracies such as system-level bureaucracy and screen-level bureaucracy. The first is composed of specialists who develop information systems for public policies, while the screen-level bureaucracy is formed by middle-level and street bureaucrats who act at the end of the provision of public services, depending on the systems to perform the work. The present work has as object of study the analysis of the relations between these bureaucracies in the implementation of public policies, with emphasis on the coordination problem. In this inter bureaucratic relationship, communities of practice, discretion and expertise are important analytical elements, since they allow the creation of strategies of action by the actors and the coordination of the policy. The theoretical references on bureaucracy and implementation of public policies were constructed not only in classical texts such as Weber (2007), Wildavsky and Pressman (1973) and Lipsky (1980) that discuss the relations between bureaucracies in the implementation of But also in the more recent work by Guy Peters (1998) and Bovens and Zouridis (2002) on the coordination and role of ICTs in policies. From a methodological point of view, it is a case study comparing two public policies that differ in the way in which the relations between system level bureaucracy and screen level bureaucracy occur. In the two informal, mutually dependent, close and complementary, informal learning networks allow actors to create and use action strategies that contribute to coordination. The distinction between policies has occurred in the identification of greater coordination problems in education policy. The explanation first relates to the substantive difference of the tax collection policy, which is of greater importance to the government and has a greater maturity in the development of information systems than other secretariats, which provides greater expertise and more collaborative relationships. Empirical evidences related to the organizational characteristics of the secretariats contribute to explain this distinction, such as: the greater turnover of the bureaucrats of the Department of Education (SEED); The separate physical location of the education systems and teams development team, different from what occurs at the Treasury Department (SEFA).
A complexidade crescente do Estado, em particular, o uso de novas tecnologias de informação e comunicação, tem gerado novos tipos de burocracias, como a system-level bureaucracy (SYB) e a screen-level bureaucracy (SCB). A primeira é composta por especialistas que desenvolvem sistemas de informação para as políticas públicas, enquanto a SCB é formada por burocratas de nível médio e de rua que atuam na ponta da prestação de serviços públicos, dependendo dos sistemas para realizar seu trabalho. O presente trabalho tem como objeto de estudo a análise das relações entre essas burocracias na implementação de políticas públicas, com destaque para a problemática da coordenação. As referências teóricas sobre burocracia e implementação de políticas públicas foram construídas a partir de Weber (2007), Wildavsky e Pressman (1973) e Lipsky (1980) que discutem as relações entre burocracias na implementação de políticas públicas, e também se baseou em trabalhos mais recentes de Guy Peters (1998) e Bovens e Zouridis (2002), concernentes à coordenação e ao papel das TICs nas políticas. Do ponto de vista metodológico, trata-se de um de caso comparado entre duas políticas públicas: a de arrecadação fiscal e de educação básica do estado do Paraná enfocando os processos de desenvolvimento de sistemas de informação com a participação da CELEPAR (Companhia de Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação do estado do Paraná). Tais políticas se diferenciam pela forma como ocorrem as relações entre a SYB e a SCB. Nas duas políticas, redes informais de aprendizado, mutuamente dependentes, próximas e complementares, permitem aos atores a criação e utilização de estratégias de ação que contribuem com a coordenação. A distinção entre as políticas se deu na identificação de maiores problemas de coordenação na política de educação. A explicação relaciona-se primeiro, à diferença substantiva da política de arrecadação fiscal, que possui maior importância para o governo e maturidade maior no desenvolvimento de sistemas de informação se comparado a outras secretarias, que confere maior expertise e relações mais colaborativas. Características organizacionais das secretarias contribuem para explicar as implicações dessa distinção, como a rotatividade maior dos burocratas da Secretaria de Educação (SEED); a localização física separada da equipe de desenvolvimento de sistemas e equipes da educação, diferente do que ocorre na Secretaria da Fazenda (SEFA).
Andersson, Malin. "Valfrihetssystem enligt LOV : Ur ett biståndshandläggar- och organisationsperspektiv." Thesis, Linnéuniversitetet, Institutionen för samhällsstudier (SS), 2014. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-36692.
Full textIdeström, Einar, and Andreas Visén. "Vem sätter betyg - Läraren eller Skolverket? : Elever och lärares syn på implementeringen av kursplanen för Samhällskunskap A i gymnasieskolan." Thesis, Linnéuniversitetet, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, SV, 2012. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-19529.
Full textUppsatsen har som syfte att undersöka hur välimplementerad skolverkets riktlinjer för kursenSamhällskunskap A samt betygsättning i denna kurs är hos lärare och elever igymnasieskolan. Som teoretisk grund för denna studie utgår vi dels från Lundquist (1992)som på ett för skolverksamheten mycket applicerbart sätt beskriver implementeringen somprocess samt förutsättningar för denna. Dels från Rothstein (red. 2008 & 2010) som beskriverregeringens behov av likvärdig och effektiv implementering för att bibehålla legitimitet. Dettaantagande att toppen av implementeringskedjan det vill säga riksdag och regering har etttydligt intresse av att implementeringen ska vara effektiv och likvärdig har varitgrundläggande för studien då samtliga tecken på brister i implementeringen bör tolkas som ettmisslyckande av dessa. Slutligen består studiens teoretiska beskrivning av Lipsky (2010) sombeskriver närbyråkraternas (lärarna) roll för implementeringen i verksamheten och derasbehov av frihet.Studieobjekt för studien har 40 elever ur den svenska gymnasieskolan bestående av tvåklasser från två olika skolor varit. Även tre lärare från två olika skolor har deltagit i studien.Som metod för att studera eleverna användes enkäter som även i en något nerbantad formbesvarades av lärarna för att utgöra en jämförelse. Lärarna i studien intervjuades i enhalvstrukturerad intervju som spelades in och återfinns som transkriberad bilaga tilluppsatsen.Förutom en öppen fråga ställd till eleverna via enkäten, samt de frågor rörandeimplementering samt förutsättningar för denna som ställdes till lärarna i intervjuerna utgårstudien från de så kallade nyckelord som beskriver efterfrågad kunskap för de olikabetygsstegen i Samhällskunskap A. I studien görs en oförberedd kontroll på hur väl lärare ochelever känner till dessa nyckelord och kan placera in dessa i korrekt betygssteg.Slutsatserna som studien visade på är bland annat att implementeringskedjan löpte hela vägenfrån toppen (riksdag och regering) till botten (eleverna). Denna slutsats var möjlig att dra dåeleverna visade på tydliga kunskaper om betygskriterierna i Samhällskunskap A. Övrigaslutsatser vi kunde dra utifrån det insamlade materialet pekade på olika typer av brister, varoch en i olika delar av implementeringskedjan. Vi vågar även påstå att det tolkade materialetkan tolkas som så att den absolut övervägande delen av implementeringskedjan har gjort deansträngningar som förväntas av dem för att åstadkomma en effektiv implementering. Vimenar att de brister som vi trots detta har lokaliserat beror på den enligt studien stora frihetsom lärare åtnjuter och att implementeringen inte låter sig tas längre med bibehållen frihet förlärarna. I studien har det även framkommit tecken på att brister i implementeringen beror påatt det material som ska implementeras (kursplanen) är dåligt anpassat till den verklighet somär reell i skolan. Felet återfinns i detta fall i toppen av implementeringskedjan då man harförsökt att implementera något som är bristfälligt anpassat till den verklighet som det syftartill att reglera.
Ydreborg, Berit. "To be in-between : the road to disability pension with reference to the Swedish social insurance system /." Doctoral thesis, Linköping : Univ, 2005. http://www.bibl.liu.se/liupubl/disp/disp2005/med929s.pdf.
Full textChen, Hong-Cheng, and 陳弘章. "The Factors of Street-level Bureaucracy Discretion: The Case of Implementing Urgent Caring System and Scheme in Taichung City." Thesis, 2010. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/62aw8q.
Full text國立中興大學
國家政策與公共事務研究所
98
Due to the global financial crisis in 2008, which led people with low to moderate incomes to a situation of worse financial difficulty, the government implemented the Operation Directive for Urgent Caring System and Scheme (UCSS) to alleviate the financial shock to the economic minorities during this period. Through the collaboration among the township administration, social workers, and charity organizations, the government expects to use UCSS as complementary measures of building a better social safety system to assist people in urgent need specifically during this period and benefit the economic minorities in general. However, when the township and districts offices implemented UCSS, there were some controversies in the procedure of qualification screening and allowance rationing. Some of reasons rooted in the fact that the responsibility of inquiry, ratification and appropriation of the scheme belonged to each township and districts office, where the street-level staffs had the discretion to decide whether a case was eligible or not. Consequently, this study aimed to explore how the street-level bureaucrats exercised their discretion in the case of UCSS. What were the key factors that affected the use of discretion? The authors first surveyed the literature on administrative discretion. The authors then surveyed the district officers and the social and construction affairs section officers in Taichung city to explore how they performed the discretion in implementing UCSS and the variables affecting their use of discretion. A linear regression model was built to specify the causal relationships of variables. The independent variables were the political factor, organizational factor, professional capacity, working pressure, and economic condition. The dependent variable was the degree of using discretion independently. The data showed that political factors and professional capacity were the significant variables that affected the use of discretion among the street-level bureaucrats in this case. More detailed findings and policy implications are also offered toward the end of this paper.
Bayrak, Sule. "Contextualizing discretion : micro-dynamics of Canada’s refugee determination system." Thèse, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/1866/13580.
Full textIn an era where international immigration is increasingly difficult and selective, refugee status constitutes a valuable public good that enables some non-citizens access and membership to the host country. Based on the discretionary judgment of the decision-maker, refugee status is only granted to claimants who establish well-founded fear of persecution if returned to their home country. Canada’s largest independent administrative tribunal, Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (IRB), is charged to hear refugee claimants and make refugee status determinations. This dissertation investigates why significant disparities exist among IRB’s politically appointed decision-makers’ refugee status grant rates. As little was known about the concrete ways Canada allocates opportunities for entry and legal status for non-citizens, lifting the blanket of administration was necessary. By exploring refugee decision-making from a Street Level Bureaucracy Theory (SLBT) perspective, and an ethnographic methodology that combined direct observation, semi-structured interviews and document analysis, the study sought first to understand whether the variation in grant rates were a result of differences in decision-makers’ discretionary practices and reasoning and second to trace the organizational factors that foster variation. In line with previous scholarship on SLBT that document how the work situation structure discretion and how individual views play in decision-making; this study demonstrates substantive differences among decision-makers in terms of their work routines, conceptions of refugee claimants and the best way to conduct their work. The analysis illustrates how decision-makers apply not a singular but a variety of approaches to the refugee hearing, ranging from rigid interrogation to the more resilient interview style. Despite clear organizational constraints on decision-makers that target to increase consistency and efficiency of refugee determinations, the significance of credibility-assessment and the invisibility of the decision-making space leave ample room for discretionary behavior. Even in rule-saturated environments like administrative tribunals which extensively regulate discretion; decision-making hardly means neutral and hierarchical rule adherence. Instead discretion is nested within the context of interaction routines, work situation, rule adherence and law. It is inherently difficult if not improbable to control and discipline discretionary decision-making even in organizations that institutionalize and standardize training and communicate their demands clearly to decision-makers. When faced with goal ambiguity and with demands that they consider run against their discretionary authority, decision-makers reinterpret their job definition and routinize their practices. They formulate an encounter routine that is organizationally acceptable to assess the people in front of them. This dissertation illustrates how unevenly the claimants, their testimony and evidence are treated and how these treatments are reflected on the refugee decision.
Books on the topic "System-level bureaucracy"
Bezes, Philippe. Challenges to French Public Administration. Edited by Robert Elgie, Emiliano Grossman, and Amy G. Mazur. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199669691.013.12.
Full textRobert, Cameron, and Brian Levy. Provincial Governance of Education—The Western Cape Experience. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198824053.003.0004.
Full textSmalskys, Vainius, and Jolanta Urbanovič. Civil Service Systems. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.160.
Full textThe purpose of this project is to identify and analysis the ways of increasing the volume of FDI in Pakistan. The whole work consists of two different approaches. The first approach is the identification of the main barrier to invest in Pakistan. In this section, the researcher is looking for the reasons why Pakistan is not making full use of its investment potential. Is it because of the ineffectiveness of Government promotion and facilitation or because of a difficult investment? Can the political and economic situation be considered stable in Pakistan? Does the inefficiency of the legal system establish negative impacts on the investment climate of Pakistan? What is the level of corrupt bureaucracy, and security situation and how does Pakistan take to improve the investment climate in the country? On the basis of such analysis, the researcher makes recommendations to Pakistan on how it can reduce the barriers to increased inward FDI volume. dublin,irish american university of ireland: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2012.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "System-level bureaucracy"
Cox, Adam B., and Cristina M. Rodríguez. "Controlling the Enforcement Bureaucracy." In The President and Immigration Law, 162–88. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190694364.003.0007.
Full textReiter, Keramet. "The Path to Pelican Bay." In Caging Borders and Carceral States, 303–40. University of North Carolina Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.5149/northcarolina/9781469651231.003.0011.
Full textRahayuningtyas, D. P. A., and F. Yulia. "Audit opinion, internal control system, bureaucracy reform, political background and the level of corruption in government institutions." In Competition and Cooperation in Economics and Business, 105–14. Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781315225227-14.
Full textFei, Wu. "The Ideal of Civilization and Formation of Institutions in Ancient China." In The Constitution of Ancient China, 191–97. Princeton University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691171593.003.0008.
Full textChehabi, H. E. "The Rise of the Middle Class in Iran before the Second World War." In The Global Bourgeoisie, 43–63. Princeton University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691177342.003.0002.
Full textAston, Joshua N. "Reforms in the Police Forces." In Torture Behind Bars, 160–77. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190120986.003.0007.
Full textVillegas Mateos, Allan Oswaldo, and José Ernesto Amorós. "The Effects of the National System of Social Security Over Senior Entrepreneurs." In Advances in Business Strategy and Competitive Advantage, 59–72. IGI Global, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2019-2.ch004.
Full textKennedy, John James, and Yaojiang Shi. "Conclusion." In Lost and Found, 191–98. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190917425.003.0006.
Full textConference papers on the topic "System-level bureaucracy"
Peters, Rob, Koen Smit, and Johan Versendaal. "Responsible AI and Power: Investigating the System Level Bureaucrat in the Legal Planning Process." In Digital Support from Crisis to Progressive Change. University of Maribor Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.18690/978-961-286-485-9.43.
Full text