Academic literature on the topic 'Sustainable Carrying Capacity Assessment'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Sustainable Carrying Capacity Assessment.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Sustainable Carrying Capacity Assessment"
Wei, Yigang, Cui Huang, Patrick T. I. Lam, and Zhiyang Yuan. "Sustainable urban development: A review on urban carrying capacity assessment." Habitat International 46 (April 2015): 64–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.10.015.
Full textHan, Yan, and Shaofeng Jia. "An Assessment of the Water Resources Carrying Capacity in Xinjiang." Water 14, no. 9 (May 9, 2022): 1510. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w14091510.
Full textChen, Shuying, Yanhu He, Qian Tan, Kejia Hu, Tianyuan Zhang, and Shan Zhang. "Comprehensive assessment of water environmental carrying capacity for sustainable watershed development." Journal of Environmental Management 303 (February 2022): 114065. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114065.
Full textChen, Ying Qin. "Application of Set Pair Analysis in Water Resources Carrying Capacity Assessment." Advanced Materials Research 1065-1069 (December 2014): 2999–3003. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.1065-1069.2999.
Full textYang, Jinbi, and Hao Ding. "A Quantitative Assessment of Sustainable Development Based on Relative Resource Carrying Capacity in Jiangsu Province of China." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15, no. 12 (December 9, 2018): 2786. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122786.
Full textZhou, Wei, Ayman Elshkaki, Shuai Zhong, and Lei Shen. "Study on Relative Carrying Capacity of Land Resources and Its Zoning in 31 Provinces of China." Sustainability 13, no. 3 (January 30, 2021): 1459. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13031459.
Full textLiu, Yu Mei, Yu Dan Dong, and Jing Wu. "Study on Dynamics of Eco-Tourism System." Advanced Materials Research 919-921 (April 2014): 2170–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.919-921.2170.
Full textChen, C. H., R. S. Wu, S. L. Liaw, W. R. Sue, and I. J. Chiou. "A study of water-land environment carrying capacity for a river basin." Water Science and Technology 42, no. 3-4 (August 1, 2000): 389–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.2000.0408.
Full textGao, Sheng, Huihui Sun, Guangxi Cao, Lin Zhao, Runjie Wang, and Min Xu. "DYNAMIC STATE OF ECOSYSTEM CARRYING CAPACITY UNDER ISLAND URBANIZATION: A CASE STUDY OF PINGTAN ISLAND IN THE SOUTHEASTERN COAST OF CHINA." Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management 28, no. 1 (January 15, 2020): 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/jeelm.2020.9798.
Full textGrofelnik, Hrvoje. "Assessment of acceptable tourism beach carrying capacity in both normal and COVID-19 pandemic conditions – case study of the Town of Mali Lošinj." Hrvatski geografski glasnik/Croatian Geographical Bulletin 82, no. 2 (December 23, 2020): 131–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.21861/hgg.2020.82.02.05.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Sustainable Carrying Capacity Assessment"
Graymore, Michelle, and n/a. "Journey to Sustainability: Small Regions, Sustainable Carrying Capacity and Sustainability Assessment Methods." Griffith University. Australian School of Environmental Studies, 2005. http://www4.gu.edu.au:8080/adt-root/public/adt-QGU20060303.132137.
Full textGraymore, Michelle. "Journey to Sustainability: Small Regions, Sustainable Carrying Capacity and Sustainability Assessment Methods." Thesis, Griffith University, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/10072/367280.
Full textThesis (PhD Doctorate)
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Australian School of Environmental Studies
Full Text
Xercavins, Josep. "Carrying Capacity In East Sub-Saharan Africa: A multilevel integrated assessment and a sustainable development approach." Doctoral thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 1999. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/6987.
Full textIn the context of the global human/earth issues (population, poverty, imbalances, environment problematic, global warming, water scarcity, economical globalization, etc.) with the others the Carrying Capacity issue is emerging. It is a "driver" which is not always simply related with sustainable development concepts. It is therefore enormously important to give adequate answers to the majority of the global dilemmas.
The definition of carrying capacity is not easy because it is controversial. So the first chapter of this study is to adopt a clearer position in reference to the meaning, the borders, the key aspects, etc., of our approach to this issue. Basically, our approach is, first, from the sustainable development point of view and, second, a local approach in a global view. Finally and concretely, we indicate what aspects, in which place, how do we study carrying capacity? The answer to these questions will be: the agricultural (land and water) reality in a very specific region of East Sub Saharan Africa.
So the next step of the work is to specify and delimit our chosen region and, obviously, to study it in detail. Chapter 2, and some parts of Chapter 8, are the results of this.
The kind of methodological approach to global human/earth issues is, clearly, the most characteristic point of our work. We follow a scientific approach developed by Dr. Mihajlo Mesarovic over forty years ago in the mathematical systems analysis field and "finished" in multilevel integrated assessment with reasoning support tools for policy analysis. We study in depth and analyze this methodology in Chapter 3.
From a first or high level point of view of a hierarchy of models in our methodology, we study the population and, for the moment in this level, the carrying capacity reality, which is a dynamic system in reality, of our case study region. We have created the corresponding model and then, we have used a reference study from FAO/IIASA/UN [B.3.7] that, according to our bibliography searches and the role that it is continuing to play in the international studies of this issue in developing countries, is a "key reference". We find all of this in chapters 5 (population) and 6 (carrying capacity). In fact one of the goals of this work as a whole is to involve, extend, and indeed test the results of the mentioned report using our methodology.
Always from the hierarchical point of view we affront, finally, the second level representation of our issue. It is the most creative part of our study. We decide, after a deep analysis of the background, that we can succeed in developing a new agricultural model involving land and water aspects.
Because water is another controversial driving factor of the global human/earth issues, we focus on it in chapter 7. We add some personal special approach according to our methodology and "philosophy".
Chapter 8 is the highlight and plays, at the same time, an integrated role of the whole study and, in particular, the second level approach from the point of view of the hierarchy of the models. It allows us to make many final conclusions in several directions. About the methodology itself: extremely powerful with the interrelated combination of the different models levels approach. About the key report cited: only needs to be revised in its high input/output forecasting. The success and new possibilities in order to study the carrying capacity issue, for future policy "vision" analysis, that we now have from the point of view of agricultural reality. Finally, a dramatic foresight and call to the international decision- makers about the situation in our Case Study Region (essentially, the more stressful sub-region of East Sub-Saharan Africa).
0.4.2. OBJECTIVES AND CONTRIBUTIONS
Assessment of carrying capacity is essential in the search for the condition of sustainable development. While sustainability has a global dimension focus, for carrying capacity assessment has to be on geographic areas within which the needs of population have to be satisfied consistent with the physiologically determined time constraints. Specifically, food had to be secured for the population on location and in time where the need exists. Large geographic areas cannot be sustained by food imported from distant locations on the globe. In short, some degree of food self-sufficiency is a prerequisite for sustainability. The research reported here started by identifying eastern Sub-Sahara Africa as the most vulnerable geographic region in the sense of carrying capacity.
The objective of the research was to approach the question of carrying capacity in a practical integrated manner ("problematique"); i.e., in the context of real constraints imposed by environmental life support resources, rather than to "reduce" the problem to the considerations of the theoretical extreme capacity that have no chance of being achieved in reality.
On the first level, a model is developed focusing on the most dominant relationship between population evolution and carrying capacity as a dynamic, time varying system. Broad based data available in international sources are used. Results of FAO research, which is recognized as being the most authoritative, is used to parameterize the model for all countries in the region as well as for the region itself. The concept of an index of carrying capacity potential is developed to assess the results of the simulation using three levels of technology inputs of agricultural production, identified by the FAO.
A second level model is developed in which actual physical constraints -land, yields, water and irrigation- are explicitly taken into account. Assessment of carrying capacity supported by actual data is then conducted using the same carrying capacity potential index as the first level. Consistency of the results on the two levels has been demonstrated. This conclusion -not to be expected a priori- has justified the application of the multilevel, from the hierarchical of the models point of view, approach. As such it presents a contribution to the methodology beyond the carrying capacity problem per se.
So, in summary, the main contributions of the thesis are threefold:
a) Contribution to the complex systems analysis methodology based on the multilevel modeling hierarchy approach, that uses the notions of a dominant relationship rather than more detailed approximation, in order to construct models on different levels of the modeling hierarchy. Consistency of the results on two levels-not expected a priori-open the ways for application of the approach to other problem domains (global warming, water scarcity, etc.).
b) Development of an agricultural (land and water) model to study carrying capacity for any country, region, on the globe. The developed models and the reasoning approach in scenario analysis can be applied to other agricultural carrying capacity problems such as, i.e., for Afghanistan, Bangladesh, etc.
c) Concrete results about targets and policies for the region in the East Sub-Saharan Africa in order to improve their food self-security.
Singer, Steven William. "ASSESSMENT OF CUMULATIVE TRAINING IMPACTS FOR SUSTAINABLE MILITARY LAND CARRYING CAPACITY AND ENVIRONMENT: QUANTIFYING QUALITY OF ENVIRONMENT AND LANDSCAPE." OpenSIUC, 2010. https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/theses/224.
Full textPaiva, Renato Inhasz. "Informação ambiental sobre produtos para o consumo sustentável: os métodos de avaliação de impacto do ciclo de vida sob a ótica da sustentabilidade forte." Universidade de São Paulo, 2016. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/106/106132/tde-28012017-145109/.
Full textThe environmental degradation provided by the consumption of products (JORGENSON, 2003) is the result of the evolution of a society that distances itself away from nature (MORAN, 2011) and from its real needs (FRY, 2005). At the same time, the interests of the market, governments and consumers maintain the hyper-consumption society (FRY, 2005). This fact is noticed by the presence of government consumption policies that appreciate environmental labeling, lay the responsibility for the reduction of the environmental degradation on the consumer (green consumption current) (AKENJI, 2014), and do not consider that the increase in eco-efficiency, without questioning the environmental limits for human activities, causes a rebound effect that can further raise environmental degradation (HANLEY et al., 2009). In contrast, the sustainable consumption current claims to be necessary to rethink consumption levels in order not to overpass the limits imposed by the environment for our activities (AKENJI, 2014). Thus, the necessary information for the sustainable consumption current is the one that indicates to what extent the environmental carrying capacity is exceeded (ALCOTT, 2008). Among all the instruments able to provide information on the environmental aspects of products, the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is the only instrument designed to assess the environmental consequences related to the life cycle of a product (CHEHEBE, 1997). However, the evidence found in the literature indicates that the methods used by LCA to measure the environmental impact of products (LCIA methods - Life Cycle Impact Assessment) were structured to mainly calculate the eco-efficiency of products, once there are only a few cases (or no indicated by references) in which the environmental carrying capacity is assessed by these methods (POTTING; HAUSCHILD, 2006). Given this context, this work aimed to evaluate whether existing LCIA methods are aligned to the strong or weak sustainability currents. Two evaluation criteria were defined on the basis of strong sustainability: (i) The results of the Impact Category indicator should present how much of the carrying capacity has been exceeded or not by the emissions related to the product life cycle according to the principle (a) of the strong sustainability, which states that human activities should be limited by the environmental carrying capacity (COSTANZA; DALY, 1992) - and (ii) All Impact Categories of a LCIA method must meet the requirement (i) - according to the principle (b) of the strong sustainability, which states that there is no complete substitutability between the different elements of natural capital (COSTANZA; DALY, 1992). From the evaluation of the LCIA methods (CML 2002, Eco-Indicator 99 Eco-Factors 2006, EDIP 2003 IMPACT2002+ and MEErP 2011) it was found that any of these methods are aligned with the principles of the strong sustainability, once the methods do not comply with criteria (i) and (ii ) concurrently. Thus, it was concluded that once they are not aligned to the principles of strong sustainability, the evaluated LCIA methods are not able to meet the demand of sustainable consumption for information. Its use demonstrates that green consumption policies continue to place the greatest responsibility for the reversal of the environmental degradation on consumers, without changing the systemic structure created by governments, the market and consumers in which hyper-consumption prevails.
Smith, Tiziana. "Quantifying China's carrying capacity : using optimization to explore sustainable food production." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/120602.
Full textThis electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.
Cataloged from student-submitted PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (pages 113-119).
Feeding the world's growing population in an environmentally sustainable way is a complex social and engineering challenge. In this thesis, we develop a novel method for assessing the number of people that can be fed sustainably in a particular region for given natural resources and diet (the carrying capacity). A quantitative assessment of carrying capacity provides insight into the food security of the study region as well as the stress on the environmental system; in addition, this methodology can be used to assess the carrying capacity under a variety of policy interventions such as increasing yields, changing diets, or expanding irrigation infrastructure. The carrying capacity assessment uses optimization methods that find the cropping pattern that maximizes population subject to land, water, and diet constraints, considering a range of rainfed and irrigated crops. A data fusion procedure estimates the regional water and land resources needed to assess carrying capacity by combining measurements from diverse hydrologic and agronomic sources, including remote sensing data. Our carrying capacity methodology is illustrated with a case study of food security in China. China has historically been largely food self-sufficient, although its food imports have been increasing since the year 2000. We find that the population in China was well below the country's carrying capacity in the year 2000 given the diet and yields in that year. However, the population's changing diet - especially the growing preference for meat - is exacting a growing toll on land and water resources. We find that under a more recent diet (2013), China is not likely to be food self-sufficient, even with major investments in irrigated agriculture, without substantial increases in crop yield.
by Tiziana Smith.
Ph. D.
Guo, Wei. "Building a tourism carrying capacity framework for global geoparks." HKBU Institutional Repository, 2019. https://repository.hkbu.edu.hk/etd_oa/712.
Full textZhang, Liye. "Carrying capacity assessment of diving sites in Hong Kong and Malaysia." HKBU Institutional Repository, 2016. https://repository.hkbu.edu.hk/etd_oa/339.
Full textNAKAMURA, Hikaru, Naoshi UEDA, Minoru KUNIEDA, and Ahmed KAMAL. "ASSESSMENT OF STRENGTHENING EFFECT ON RC BEAMS WITH UHP-SHCC." 日本コンクリート工学会, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/2237/20917.
Full textLane, Murray C. "The development of a carrying capacity assessment model for the Australian socio-environmental context." Thesis, Queensland University of Technology, 2014. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/67485/1/Murray_Lane_Thesis.pdf.
Full textBooks on the topic "Sustainable Carrying Capacity Assessment"
Network, Carrying Capacity. The carrying capacity briefing book. Washington, D.C: Carrying Capacity Network, 1996.
Find full textWalchester, John. Tourism carrying capacity in planning for sustainable tourism development. Oxford: Oxford Brookes University, 1993.
Find full textRees, William E. Pressing global limits: Trade as the appropriation of carrying capacity. Vancouver: Centre for Human Settlements, School of Community and Regional Planning, University of British Columbia, 1994.
Find full textGrimble, Robin. Carrying capacity: Sustainable use and demographic determinants of natural habitats and ecosystems management. Washington, D.C: World Bank, 1996.
Find full textNational Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Science and Policy for the Coastal Ocean., National Research Council (U.S.). Ocean Studies Board., and National Research Council (U.S.). Water Science and Technology Board., eds. A Review of the Florida Keys carrying capacity study. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press, 2002.
Find full textQu yu sheng tai cheng zai li yu sheng tai an quan yan jiu. Beijing: Zhongguo huan jing ke xue chu ban she, 2010.
Find full textFacility, Global Environment. Cross-cutting report: National Capacity Self Assessment Project (NCSA) : Samoa. S.l: s.n., 2006.
Find full textIsland, Croatia) International Conference on Island Sustainability (2nd 2012 Brač. Island sustainability II. Southampton, UK: WIT Press, 2013.
Find full textKhanna, P. Carrying-capacity as a basis for sustainable development: A case study of National Capital Region in India. Oxford: Pergamon, 1999.
Find full textIsland sustainability. Southampton: WIT Press, 2010.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Sustainable Carrying Capacity Assessment"
Bhagwat, Jayeshkumar Maheshkumar, and Varuvel Devadas. "Sustainable Infrastructure Planning by Using Carrying Capacity Assessment in Gwalior City." In Sustainability in the Built Environment in the 21st Century: Lessons Learned from India and the Region, 89–102. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61891-9_6.
Full textMcKindsey, Christopher W. "Carrying Capacity carrying capacity for Sustainable Bivalve Aquaculture carrying capacity sustainable bivalve aquaculture." In Sustainable Food Production, 449–66. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5797-8_179.
Full textMcKindsey, Christopher W. "Carrying Capacity carrying capacity for Sustainable Bivalve Aquaculture carrying capacity sustainable bivalve aquaculture." In Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology, 1959–76. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0851-3_179.
Full textSgobbo, Alessandro. "Sustainable Planning: The Carrying Capacity Approach." In New Metropolitan Perspectives, 633–42. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48279-4_59.
Full textSati, Vishwambhar Prasad. "Tourism Carrying Capacity and Destination Development." In Sustainable Tourism Development in the Himalaya: Constraints and Prospects, 123–31. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58854-0_10.
Full textThe Ecologist. "■ “Carrying Capacity”, “Over Population” and Environmental Degradation." In The Earthscan Reader in Sustainable Development, 101–3. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003403432-13.
Full textFerreira, Joao G., Jon Grant, David W. Verner-Jeffreys, and Nick G. H. Taylor. "Carrying Capacity for Aquaculture Aquaculture , Modeling Frameworks for Determination of." In Sustainable Food Production, 417–48. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5797-8_904.
Full textSmaal, Aad C., and L. A. van Duren. "Bivalve Aquaculture Carrying Capacity: Concepts and Assessment Tools." In Goods and Services of Marine Bivalves, 451–83. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96776-9_23.
Full textÁngel, Piroska, and Kay Bergamini. "Sociocultural-Carrying Capacity: Impact of Population Growth in Rapa Nui." In Sustainable Human–Nature Relations, 23–47. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3049-4_2.
Full textPanwar, Himanshhu, Jwngma Basumatary, and Meenakshi Dhote. "Carrying Capacity of Air Environment and Development of a Megacity." In Sustainable Urbanism in Developing Countries, 215–28. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003131922-13.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Sustainable Carrying Capacity Assessment"
Tselentis, B. S., D. G. Prokopiou, and M. Toanoglou. "Carrying capacity assessment for the Greek islands of Kalymnos, Kos and Rhodes." In SUSTAINABLE TOURISM 2006. Southampton, UK: WIT Press, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/st060331.
Full textLi, Zhigang, and Yangjie Tian. "Assessment of Relative Water Resources Carrying Capacity and Sustainable Development in Chengdu,China." In Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium of Risk Analysis and Risk Management in Western China (WRARM 2019). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/wrarm-19.2019.3.
Full textCARRIÓN-MERO, PAÚL, FERNANDO MORANTE-CARBALLO, PAULA PALOMEQUE-ARÉVALO, and BORIS APOLO-MASACHE. "ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TOURIST CARRYING CAPACITY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF GEOSITES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF GEOTOURISM, GUAYAQUIL, ECUADOR." In SUSTAINABLE CITY 2021. Southampton UK: WIT Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/sc210131.
Full textOberst, Ala, and Maria Gheorghita. "Consolidate the reputation and increase the credibility of the company through the implementation of the social audit." In 4th Economic International Conference "Competitiveness and Sustainable Development". Technical University of Moldova, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.52326/csd2022.18.
Full textRosales, Natalie. "Expanding an understanding of urban resilience in the realm of adaptation planning." In 55th ISOCARP World Planning Congress, Beyond Metropolis, Jakarta-Bogor, Indonesia. ISOCARP, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.47472/rijg3216.
Full textDianhong, Zhao. "Research on land space optimisation based on dual evaluation from the perspective of human-earth relations." In Post-Oil City Planning for Urban Green Deals Virtual Congress. ISOCARP, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.47472/cdjb3416.
Full textHe, R. M., J. Y. Zhang, X. J. Wang, and G. Q. Wang. "Advances on regional water environment carrying capacity." In The 2015 International Conference on Sustainable Development (ICSD2015). WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789814749916_0056.
Full textPOOT QUINTAL, MARÍA DENY D., and ROMANO G. SEGRADO PAVÓN. "TOURISM CARRYING CAPACITY FOR BEACHES IN TULUM NATIONAL PARK, MEXICO." In SUSTAINABLE TOURISM 2020. Southampton UK: WIT Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/st200161.
Full textProkopiou, D. G., B. S. Tselentis, and M. Toanoglou. "Comparative analysis of carrying capacity indices for the central Aegean islands." In SUSTAINABLE TOURISM 2012. Southampton, UK: WIT Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/st120071.
Full textCastellani, V., S. Sala, and D. Pitea. "A new method for tourism carrying capacity assessment." In ECOSUD 2007. Southampton, UK: WIT Press, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/eco070341.
Full textReports on the topic "Sustainable Carrying Capacity Assessment"
Guertin, Patrick J., and William D. Meyer. Sustainable Army Training Lands/Carrying Capacity: Training Use Distribution Model (TUDM). Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, May 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada405023.
Full textGambill, Daniel, Matthew Stoklosa, Sean Matus, Heidi Howard, and Garrett Feezor. White Sands Missile Range Thurgood Canyon watershed : analysis of Range Road 7 for development of best management practices and recommendations. Engineer Research and Development Center (U.S.), September 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.21079/11681/45622.
Full textIsrael, Alvaro, and John Merrill. Production of Seed Stocks for Sustainable Tank Cultivation of the Red Edible Seaweed Porphyra. United States Department of Agriculture, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.32747/2006.7696527.bard.
Full textWalz, Yvonne, Florence Nick, Oscar Higuera Roa, Udo Nehren, and Zita Sebesvari. Coherence and Alignment among Sustainable Land Management, Ecosystem-based Adaptation, Ecosystem-based Disaster Risk Reduction and Nature-based Solutions. United Nations University - Institute for Environment and Human Security, November 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.53324/mwgp9896.
Full textScoular, Claire, and Ian Teo. Developing strategic plans for an aligned approach to 21st century skills integration. Australian Council for Educational Research, March 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.37517/978-1-74286-626-0.
Full textJourneay, M., P. LeSueur, W. Chow, and C L Wagner. Physical exposure to natural hazards in Canada. Natural Resources Canada/CMSS/Information Management, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4095/330012.
Full textPacific Transport Sector Assessment, Strategy, and Road Map 2021–2025. Asian Development Bank, July 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.22617/sgp210255-2.
Full text