Academic literature on the topic 'Supreme Court Library'

Wright, Jacqueline S. "The Supreme Court Library: A Source of Pride." Arkansas Historical Quarterly 47, no. 2 (1988): 137. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/40038146.

Thompson, Jane. "Sources: The U.S. Supreme Court." Reference & User Services Quarterly 47, no. 1 (September 1, 2007): 91–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/rusq.47n1.91.

Sholikin, M. Nur. "PERBAIKAN PROSEDUR PENGUJIAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN DI MAHKAMAH AGUNG." Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 3, no. 2 (July 31, 2014): 149. http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/jhp.3.2.2014.149-162.

Cervenka, Patricia A. "Wisconsin Supreme Court and Legislative History." Legal Reference Services Quarterly 30, no. 1-2 (January 2011): 141–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0270319x.2011.585330.

Peremana, I. Made Widi Adi, A. A. Sagung Laksmi Dewi, and Ni Made Sukaryati Karma. "Tinjauan Yuridis Pengajuan Permohonan Peninjauan Kembali pada Perkara Pidana dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia." Jurnal Preferensi Hukum 1, no. 2 (September 15, 2020): 99–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.22225/jph.1.2.2347.99-105.

Noviyanti, Liana, and Mulati Mulati. "PENERAPAN WASIAT WAJIBAH TERHADAP NON MUSLIM DITINJAU DARI KOMPILASI HUKUM ISLAM (KHI) STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 331/K/AG/2018/MA." Jurnal Hukum Adigama 2, no. 2 (December 27, 2019): 267. http://dx.doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v2i2.6533.

Desyanti, Desyanti, Sudarsono Sudarsono, Muchamad Ali Safa’at, and Tunggul Anshari Setia Negara. "The Original Intent of Settings Judicial Review of Local Regulations in Indonesia." International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 8, no. 9 (September 7, 2021): 300. http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i9.3001.

Muzzammil, Mohd. "Collection Development of Legal Information Resources in the Supreme Court of India." Legal Information Management 20, no. 2 (June 2020): 108–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1472669620000262.

Shafie, Aminath Asfa, and Shamrahayu Abdul Aziz. "SUPREME COURT’S JUDICIAL REVIEW AUTHORITY VS. CONSTITUTIONAL SUPREMACY IN THE MALDIVES: DOES THE CONSTITUTION STILL REIGN SUPREME?" IIUM Law Journal 27, no. 2 (December 19, 2019): 469–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v27i2.417.

Bahr, William L. "Quick guide to finding US Supreme Court cases." Reference Services Review 36, no. 3 (August 15, 2008): 232–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00907320810895323.

Roberts, Olivia DeHaviland. "The historical approach to the analysis of the affirmative action controversy and the perspective of the United States Supreme Court the need for affirmative action to exist in present day America /." Instructions for remote access. Click here to access this electronic resource. Access available to Kutztown University faculty, staff, and students only, 1990. http://www.kutztown.edu/library/services/remote_access.asp.

Lambert, Greg. Wyoming State Law Library database of Supreme Court decisions: Reference guide. [Cheyenne, Wyo: Wyoming State Law Library?, 2001.

(Japan), Saikō Saibansho Toshokan. A catalogue of the law collection in the Supreme Court Library. Tokyo: Supreme Court Library, 1993.

Walser, George. The Supreme Court appointment process: A checklist of CRS products. [Washington, D.C.]: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, 1993.

Reynolds, Susan Jayne. Books for the profession: The library of the Supreme Court of Victoria. North Melbourne, Vic: Australian Scholarly, 2012.

W, Landynski Jacob, ed. The living U.S. Constitution: Historical background, landmark Supreme Court decisions : with introductions, indexed guide, pen portraits of the signers. 3rd ed. New York, N.Y., U.S.A: Meridian, 1995.

Baldacci, David. Vuil spel. Utrecht: Bruna, 1999.

Baldacci, David. The simple truth. London: Pocket, 2000.

Baldacci, David. La simple vérité. Paris: Éd. France loisirs, 2000.

Baldacci, David. The simple truth. New York, NY: Warner Books, 1998.

Baldacci, David. The simple truth. New York, NY: Warner Books, 1999.

Sun, Huapu, Yingshi Guan, Su Qi, Zhaoyang Dong, and Qing Zhou. "The Criminal Judgment of the Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China The People v. Zhang Wenzhong (The Crimes Regarding Fraud, Institutional Bribery and Misappropriation of Funds)." In Library of Selected Cases from the Chinese Court, 49–73. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0342-9_4.

Holiday, Ryan. "How Hitler Nearly Destroyed the Great American Novel." In John Fante's Ask the Dust, 213–34. Fordham University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823287864.003.0014.

Dalivalle, Margaret, Martin Kemp, and Robert B. Simon. "The Calm Centre." In Leonardo's Salvator Mundi and the Collecting of Leonardo in the Stuart Courts, 53–69. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198813835.003.0003.

"Surprisingly, there are no official authoritative series of law reports in England to equate with the Queen’s Printers copy of an Act of Parliament. The Stationery Office is responsible for publishing revenue, immigration and social security law cases. However, traditionally, law reports remain in the hands of private publishers. Today, there are numerous, often competitive, private publishers. Although there are no official series of law reports, the courts do respect some reports more than others. A long established, conventional rule is that a law report, if it is to be accepted by the relevant court as an authority, must be prepared by and published under the name of a fully qualified barrister. The greater accuracy of modern reporting, and the vetting by judges, necessitates longer delays before the cases are published. Also, the Law Reports only cover 7% of the cases in the higher courts in any given year. Interesting issues are: (a) who selects which cases to report? (b) how are they selected? Editors select the cases for inclusion in the series of law reports. These are highly trained lawyers, well acquainted with precedent and the likely importance of cases. During the past 150 years publishers of law reports have been generalists or specialists. Some law reports are annotated, particularly for the use of practitioners, others left without annotations, introductions, etc. In addition to reported cases, the Supreme Court Library contains thousands of files of unreported cases. In 1940, the Lord Chancellor’s Department prepared a report: The Report of the Law Reporting Committee. The Committee considered that, after editors had made their choices, ‘What remains is less likely to be a treasure house than a rubbish heap in which a jewel will rarely, if ever, be discovered’ (p 20). (Note the poetic language that forcefully carries the point.) Of course, today, there is a vast range of electronic retrieval systems for accessing details of thousands of unreported cases. This has caused its own problems and there was a legitimate concern that courts would be inundated with cases that did not really contain any new law, but which had been retrieved from electronic sources. In the case of Roberts Petroleum Ltd v Bernard Kenny Ltd [1983] 2 AC 192, the House of Lords took the step of forbidding the citation of unreported cases of the civil division of the Court of Appeal without special leave. The rule remains, however, that to be an accepted version that can be quoted in court the report must have been prepared and published by a barrister. When law students read law reports they must ask: (a) is this report the most authoritative version available? (b) are there fuller versions? (c) if unreported, does this case add to the law? Figure 4.2, below, sets out the types of reports available for the law student to consult." In Legal Method and Reasoning, 78–79. Routledge-Cavendish, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781843145103-58.

Band, Jonathan. Justice Breyer, Copyright, and Libraries. Association of Research Libraries, May 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.29242/breyercopyright2022.