Academic literature on the topic 'Supreme Court (Australia)'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Supreme Court (Australia).'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Supreme Court (Australia)"
Bartlett, Francesca, and Heather Douglas. "‘Benchmarking’ a Supreme Court and Federal Court judge in Australia." Oñati Socio-legal Series 8, no. 9 (December 31, 2018): 1355–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0992.
Full textDale, Gregory. "Appealing to Whom? Australia's ‘Appellate Jurisdiction’ Over Nauru." International and Comparative Law Quarterly 56, no. 3 (July 2007): 641–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/iclq/lei186.
Full textKirby CMG, Michael J. "THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA AND THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES - A CENTENARY REFLECTION." Denning Law Journal 16, no. 1 (November 23, 2012): 45–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.5750/dlj.v16i1.300.
Full textStevens, Tracey, and George Williams. "A Supreme Court for the United Kingdom? A view from the High Court of Australia." Legal Studies 24, no. 1-2 (March 2004): 188–209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121x.2004.tb00247.x.
Full textKee, Christopher, and Stephen Barrett-White. "Enforcement of Arbitral Awards where the Seat of the Arbitration is Australia — How the Eisenwerk Decision Might Still be a Sleeping Assassin." Journal of International Arbitration 24, Issue 5 (October 1, 2007): 515–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/joia2007038.
Full textStephan, Paul B. "U.S. Supreme Court: Morrison v. Australia Nat’l Bank Ltd." International Legal Materials 49, no. 5 (October 2010): 1217–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.5305/intelegamate.49.5.1217.
Full textJenks, Chris. "The United States Supreme Court: Graham v. Florida & the Federal Court of Australia: Habib v. Australia." International Legal Materials 49, no. 4 (August 2010): 1029–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.5305/intelegamate.49.4.1029.
Full textBeswick, Samuel. "Strike-out Appeals, Unjust Enrichment, and Discoverability: Insights from Kenya." Common Law World Review 51, no. 1-2 (May 18, 2022): 12–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14737795211070838.
Full textRaphael, David K. L. "Comparing the institutional constructive trust with the remedial constructive trust." Trusts & Trustees 25, no. 9 (November 1, 2019): 919–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttz091.
Full textKaal, Wulf A. "Extraterritorial Application of US Securities Law: Will the US Become the Default Jurisdiction for European Securities Litigation?" European Company Law 7, Issue 3 (June 1, 2010): 90–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/eucl2010019.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Supreme Court (Australia)"
Kenny, Susan Coralie. "Constitutional facts and their judicial ascertainment in the United States Supreme Court with a comparative reference to the practice of the Australian High Court." Thesis, University of Oxford, 1988. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.670340.
Full textFletcher, Debra A. "The woman in the dock is a monster: An investigation of female criminality in the hearings of the Perth Supreme Court, 1890-1914." Thesis, Edith Cowan University, Research Online, Perth, Western Australia, 1995. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/1194.
Full textRogers, Nanette. "Aboriginal law and sentencing in the Northern Territory Supreme Court at Alice Springs 1986-1995." Connect to full text, 1998. http://hdl.handle.net/2123/1142.
Full text(14011126), Gayle B. S. Fox. "Modelling District Court decision-making: Offender identity, judicial attitudes and legal factors." Thesis, 2005. https://figshare.com/articles/thesis/Modelling_District_Court_decision-making_Offender_identity_judicial_attitudes_and_legal_factors/21398823.
Full textThe guiding orientation of the present research was whether two conflicting positions, (1) that sentencing in a criminal case is a complex decision-making process, and (2) that sentencing is a judgment based upon few offence and/or offender details, could be reconciled. The competing claims lend support to the opposing viewpoints on sentencing guidelines, and are explicitly or implicitly utilised by each side in the law and order' debate, but each is deficient in current empirical or theoretical investigation. Archival research was undertaken on assault occasioning bodily harm cases from the Queensland District Court. Study 1 (N = 244) investigated the correlations between 27 offence, offender, victim and sentencer characteristics (e.g., use of a weapon in the assault, offender's prior convictions, victim's gender and sentencer's expertise), five theorised preliminary decisions (e.g., whether to impose a tariff versus individualised penalty, to set a utilitarian versus retributive punishment), and five sentencing decisions (e.g., to record or not record a conviction, to impose a lenient or a harsh penalty). Results favoured the conclusion that sentencing is a complex decision-making process. Numerous correlations between the variables were initially indicated, although the effects on the sentencing decisions decreased when the offence seriousness and the offender's prior criminal history were controlled for. Guided by the results from Study 1, five increasingly complex legal and theoretical models were developed. The models were arranged hierarchically, initially including only legal variables and then expanded to incorporate concepts from Schubert's (1965;1974) Attitudinal Model of Supreme Court decision-making, and from Heise's (1988) Affect Control Theory. These were evaluated in Study 2 (N=393) using structural equation modelling. Model comparisons revealed that while the Simple Legal Model, (the first model presented including the harm caused by the offence, the offender's prior criminal history, and prescribed aggravating features of the attack) explained almost half of the variance in the sentencing decision, the model offered a poor fit to the data. While each of the three succeeding models improved the model fit, it was the fifth model, incorporating legal variables, preliminary decisions, attitudes, and particularly the sentencer's evaluation of the `character' of the offender, which best represented the data, without sacrificing parsimony, in addition to accounting for almost two-thirds of the variance in the sentencing decision (65.3%). It was concluded that sentencing is a complex decision-making process, and that the judgment is based upon few offence and/or offender details. Firstly, a relatively small number of offence and offender characteristics accounted for the greater part of the variance in the sentencing decision. Judges however, appeared to organise the information provided in order to make assessments about the offender, in the manner predicted by Affect Control Theory. The overall result therefore, supported the complex decision-making process subscribed to by judges. Limitations of the research and the implications of these results for the main players in the process, the inclusion of psychological theory in the courtroom, and the community's understanding of the system, are discussed.
Books on the topic "Supreme Court (Australia)"
Court, Northern Territory Supreme. Northern Territory of Australia: Supreme Court rules. [Canberry]: Govt. Printer of the Northern Territory, 1987.
Find full textThe High Court and the Constitution. 5th ed. Sydney: The Federation Press, 2008.
Find full textEmerson, John. First among equals: Chief Justices of South Australia since Federation. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Barr Smith Press, 2006.
Find full textZines, Leslie. High Court and the Constitution. Taylor & Francis Group, 2012.
Find full textPowell, Philip. Origins and Development of the Protective Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of New South Wales. Taylor & Francis Group, 2007.
Find full textAlarie, Benjamin, and Andrew J. Green. Commitment and Cooperation on High Courts. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199397594.003.0001.
Full textAlarie, Benjamin, and Andrew J. Green. Commitment and Cooperation on High Courts. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199397594.001.0001.
Full textRoger, Halson. 1 The Historical Origins of the ‘Penalty’ Rule. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198785132.003.0001.
Full textLunn, Robert. Suing in South Australia: Procedures in the Supreme, District and Magistrates Courts of South Australia ? for Practising Lawyers... Suing in SA Pty Ltd, 2016.
Find full textButt, Simon, and Tim Lindsey. Criminal Procedure. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199677740.003.0012.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Supreme Court (Australia)"
Hill, Lisa, Max Douglass, and Ravi Baltutis. "Why Australia Is a Great Place to Start: The Implied Freedom of Political Communication and TIPA Laws." In How and Why to Regulate False Political Advertising in Australia, 45–56. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2123-0_5.
Full textCane, Peter. "3. The Common Law, the High Court of Australia, and the United States Supreme Court." In Apex Courts and the Common Law, edited by Paul Daly, 66–93. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/9781487530167-005.
Full textHill, Lisa, Max Douglass, and Ravi Baltutis. "Ten Recommendations for an Effective Model for Regulating Truth in Political Advertising and Conclusion." In How and Why to Regulate False Political Advertising in Australia, 141–50. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2123-0_10.
Full textKeene, Alex Ruck, and Mary Sealy. "Australia—Victoria." In The International Protection of Adults. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/9780198727255.003.0032.
Full textBrice, Dickson. "1 Introduction." In The Irish Supreme Court. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198793731.003.0001.
Full textWheeler, Fiona, and John Williams. "‘Restrained Activism’ in the High Court of Australia." In Judicial Activism in Common Law Supreme Courts, 19–68. Oxford University Press, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199213290.003.0002.
Full textLeeming, Mark. "Ministerial Override Certificates and the Law/Fact Distinction -- A Comparison Between Australia and the United Kingdom." In UK Supreme Court Yearbook Volume 1, 84–106. Appellate Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.19152/ukscy.651.
Full textFrench, Robert. "Australia and the United Kingdom: A Bit Like Family, Much in Common But a Lot of Difference." In UK Supreme Court Yearbook Volume 1, 17–26. Appellate Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.19152/ukscy.703.
Full text"Western Response to Soviet Proposals on Germany; South African Supreme Court Holds Voting Law Unconstitutional." In Letters to Australia, Volume 4, 31–33. Sydney University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvx8b7c5.16.
Full text"UK Considers Review of Laws of Evidence and Procedure; US Supreme Court Declares Death Penalty Unconstitutional." In Letters to Australia, Volume 6, 176–77. Sydney University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvx5w93p.74.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Supreme Court (Australia)"
Harper, Glenn. "Becoming Ultra-Civic: The Completion of Queen’s Square, Sydney 1962-1978." In The 38th Annual Conference of the Society of Architectural Historians Australia and New Zealand. online: SAHANZ, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.55939/a4009pijuv.
Full text