Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Superfunds / Journal articles

Journal articles on the topic 'Superfunds'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Superfunds.

Author: Grafiati

Published: 10 December 2022

Last updated: 28 January 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Superfunds.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Cheek, Leslie. "Superfund: Bad Administration or Bad Law? A Critique of Seth Mones' "Capturing Superfund's Potential"1." Risk Analysis 11, no. 1 (March 1991): 101–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1991.tb00578.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Janis, James R., and Edwin Berk. "SUPERFUND - Pro..... SUPERFUND: SIGNIFICANT ACCOMPLISHMENTSa." Ground Water 25, no. 1 (January 1987): 2–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1987.tb02109.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Currie, Janet, Michael Greenstone, and Enrico Moretti. "Superfund Cleanups and Infant Health." American Economic Review 101, no. 3 (May 1, 2011): 435–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.3.435.

Full text

Abstract:

We are the first to examine the effect of Superfund cleanups on infant health rather than focusing on proximity to a site. We study singleton births to mothers residing within 5km of a Superfund site between 1989–2003 in five large states. Our “difference in differences” approach compares birth outcomes before and after a site clean-up for mothers who live within 2,000 meters of the site and those who live between 2,000–5,000 meters of a site. We find that proximity to a Superfund site before cleanup is associated with a 20 to 25% increase in the risk of congenital anomalies.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Blacconiere, Walter G., and W. Dana Northcut. "Environmental Information and Market Reactions to Environmental Legislation." Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 12, no. 2 (April 1997): 149–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0148558x9701200203.

Full text

Abstract:

Environmental issues have attracted national attention and are becoming a focus at many firms. This paper examines the relation between stock price reactions to the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986 and environmental information. We include alternative information sources in a test of the value relevance of environmental data. We find some evidence that chemical firms with more extensive environmental disclosures included in their 10-K reports had a less negative reaction to SARA, while firms with greater exposure to Superfund costs (based on EPA data) had a more negative market reaction. A primary contribution of our research is the finding that both financial statement environmental disclosures and estimated Superfund costs have incremental value relevance.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Barcelona, Michael J. "Whither Superfund?" Ground Water Monitoring & Remediation 28, no. 4 (September 2008): 36–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6592.2008.00218.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Suk, William, and Beth Anderson. "Superfund Conferences." Environmental Health Perspectives 101, no. 6 (November 1993): 538–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.93101538.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

HOGUE, CHERYL. "SUPERFUND SLOWDOWN." Chemical & Engineering News 85, no. 46 (November 12, 2007): 41–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cen-v085n046.p041.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Dowd, Richard M. "Finally......Superfund." Environmental Science & Technology 20, no. 12 (December 1986): 1207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es00154a600.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Hanash, R. S. "Superfund reform." Federal Facilities Environmental Journal 6, no. 4 (1995): 115–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ffej.3330060412.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Amolegbe, Sara M., Adeline R. Lopez, Maria L. Velasco, Danielle J. Carlin, Michelle L. Heacock, Heather F. Henry, Brittany A. Trottier, and William A. Suk. "Adapting to Climate Change: Leveraging Systems-Focused Multidisciplinary Research to Promote Resilience." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 22 (November 8, 2022): 14674. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214674.

Full text

Abstract:

Approximately 2000 official and potential Superfund sites are located within 25 miles of the East or Gulf coasts, many of which will be at risk of flooding as sea levels rise. More than 60 million people across the United States live within 3 miles of a Superfund site. Disentangling multifaceted environmental health problems compounded by climate change requires a multidisciplinary systems approach to inform better strategies to prevent or reduce exposures and protect human health. The purpose of this minireview is to present the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Superfund Research Program (SRP) as a useful model of how this systems approach can help overcome the challenges of climate change while providing flexibility to pivot to additional needs as they arise. It also highlights broad-ranging SRP-funded research and tools that can be used to promote health and resilience to climate change in diverse contexts.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Ferrey, Steven. "Superfund Chaos Theory: What Happens When the Lower Federal Courts Don't Follow the Supreme Court." Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law, no. 6.1 (2016): 151. http://dx.doi.org/10.36640/mjeal.6.1.superfund.

Full text

Abstract:

There is legal chaos in the national Superfund. The Supreme Court reversed decisions of eleven federal circuit courts in United States v. Atlantic Research Corp. There is no instance in modern Supreme Court history where the Court reversed every federal circuit court in the country, as it did in Atlantic Research. The Supreme Court’s reversal was through a unanimous decision. This was extraordinary: It not only reversed the entire legal interpretation of one of America’s most critical statutes, but also re-allocated billions of dollars among private parties. The Supreme Court, when it rendered its decision, seemed to be rectifying a bottleneck in Superfund remediation of hazardous waste. However, in the decade since this Supreme Court decision, several federal trial and circuit courts have circumvented the Supreme Court command. This article illustrates how the lower federal courts have done this without violating Article III of the Constitution, by re-defining a one-word term. The practical impact has been chaos in hazardous substance remediation across the U.S., affecting an estimated 600,000 contaminated waste sites. There are huge dollar impacts: addressing the 350,000 remaining contaminated sites in the U.S. would cost up to one-quarter trillion dollars, or an expenditure of $6-8 billion annually. This Article analyzes how the lower federal courts have circumvented the Supreme Court decisions, with particular focus on decisions and legal prestidigitation in the most recent four years. This lower court inversion of the law is without much basis in law, and resurrects exactly what the Supreme Court thought it had overruled unanimously. What transpired in enforcement in the lower courts is not what the Supreme Court’s opinion contemplated. This Article examines the method by which the lower federal courts have created an ongoing legal mechanism to circumvent the most important Supreme Court holding in a critical area of the economy.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Zaragoza, Larry J. "The Environmental Protection Agency’s Use of Community Involvement to Engage Communities at Superfund Sites." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, no. 21 (October 29, 2019): 4166. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214166.

Full text

Abstract:

The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Superfund program was established to identify, assess and clean up the nation’s worst hazardous waste sites to protect human health and the environment. Community involvement is an important part of the Superfund program for at least three reasons. First, involving communities in decision making at Superfund sites is a statutory requirement. Second, community involvement is important so that clean up decisions will support reuse in the surrounding community. Third, because even after cleanup many sites have residual contamination that warrants administrative and legal controls to protect health and the environment, community members should understand these controls to both help protect community members and any limitations on site reuse. Community feedback informs both proposed actions and local reuse decisions. While the EPA recognizes that the agency performs many activities that are helpful to support community involvement, there are areas in need of improvement and further research would be helpful for communities in the future.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Gearhart-Serna, Larisa M., Nishad Jayasundara, Moises Tacam, Richard Di Giulio, and Gayathri R. Devi. "Assessing Cancer Risk Associated with Aquatic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Pollution Reveals Dietary Routes of Exposure and Vulnerable Populations." Journal of Environmental and Public Health 2018 (September 19, 2018): 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5610462.

Full text

Abstract:

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) exposure is widespread, and many PAHs are considered carcinogenic. The PAH-contaminated AWI Superfund site in Virginia provides a model for studying a complex PAH mixture and its extrapolation to cancer risk and PAH exposure in the general population. We examined cancer risk at the Superfund site due to sediment-derived PAHs and then evaluated PAH sources in the general population and potentially vulnerable subpopulations upon PAH mixture exposure. The PAH mixture was assessed for potential carcinogenicity using the US EPA’s OncoLogic™ ranking tool and the US EPA list of priority PAHs. Cancer risk due to PAH exposure was calculated for Superfund site users and compared to the US EPA assessment. Human intake and health endpoints of PAHs within the mixture were extracted from USEtox® chemical fate database, while mean intake exposure was calculated for U.S. adults for select PAHs using NHANES database urinary biomarkers. Eleven PAH compounds within the mixture were of carcinogenic concern, and seven PAHs conveyed significant excess cancer risk at the Superfund site and in the general population, wherein PAH-contaminated seafood ingestion was a main contributor. Other dietary sources of PAHs derived from PAH-contaminated soil or water could also play a role in total exposure. Vulnerable populations to PAH exposure and coinciding increased cancer risk may include, in addition to smokers, children and non-Hispanic blacks, which is a public health concern.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Judy, Martha L., and Katherine N. Probst. "Superfund at 30." Vermont Journal of Environmental Law 11, no. 2 (2009): 191. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/vermjenvilaw.11.2.191.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

McNiel, Douglas W., and Andrew W. Foshee. "SUPERFUND FINANCING ALTERNATIVES." Review of Policy Research 7, no. 4 (June 1988): 751–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1988.tb00893.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Grumbly, Thomas P. "Lessons from Superfund." Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 37, no. 2 (March 1995): 33–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00139157.1995.9929221.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Dement, John. "Training Under Superfund." Toxicology and Industrial Health 5, no. 4 (October 1989): 103–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/074823378900500414.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Kerr, Cathel. "UN request superfund." Trends in Microbiology 9, no. 7 (July 2001): 313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0966-842x(01)02125-4.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

RABER, LINDA R. "SUPERFUND: REFORMS HELPFUL." Chemical & Engineering News 76, no. 4 (January 26, 1998): 24–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cen-v076n004.p024.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Anderson, Frederick R. "Superfund and negotiation." Environmental Impact Assessment Review 5, no. 4 (December 1985): 295–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0195-9255(85)90025-3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Bennett, GaryF. "Superfund XIV proceedings." Journal of Hazardous Materials 39, no. 1 (October 1994): 124–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3894(94)80069-3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Porter, J. Winston. "Cleaning up Superfund." Environmental Progress 15, no. 2 (1996): A3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ep.670150202.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Grumbly, Thomas P. "Making superfund work." Environmental Progress 8, no. 1 (February 1989): F2—F3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ep.3300080102.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Erickson, Larry E., and Stanley C. Grant. "Making superfund work." Environmental Progress 13, no. 1 (February 1994): F5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ep.670130103.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Cahan, Steven F., Betty M. Chavis, and Richard G. Elmendorf. "Earnings Management of Chemical Firms in Response to Political Costs from Environmental Legislation." Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 12, no. 1 (January 1997): 37–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0148558x9701200103.

Full text

Abstract:

This paper examines the earnings management of chemical firms at the end of 1979 when Congress was considering legislation leading to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Recovery Act of 1980. This legislation gave the U.S. government the authority to remediate hazardous chemical waste sites and set up a Superfund, funded largely by the chemical industry, to cover cleanup costs. Unlike prior studies that use single, often crude, measures of political costs, we employ seven different measures of the firms' exposure to costs arising from Superfund. Additionally, using factor analysis, we construct a composite measure of political costs. There is some evidence from time-series tests that chemical firms took income-decreasing accruals in 1979 at the height of the Superfund debate but, as expected, they did not in the prior or preceding year. Cross-sectional tests show that the size of the earnings response is correlated negatively with four of the seven individual proxies for political costs. Also, the common factor for political cost is related significantly to the earnings response. Overall, the evidence is consistent with the political cost hypothesis.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Freeman, A. Myrick. "Environmental Policy Since Earth Day I: What Have We Gained?" Journal of Economic Perspectives 16, no. 1 (February 1, 2002): 125–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/0895330027148.

Full text

Abstract:

I review the data on costs and benefits of the major environmental laws passed during the 1970s. The winners in terms of benefit-cost analysis include: getting lead out of gasoline; controlling particulate air pollution; reducing the concentration of lead in drinking water; and the cleanup of hazardous waste sites with the lowest cost per cancer case avoided under Superfund The losers include: mobile source air pollution control; water pollution control; and many of the regulations and cleanup decisions taken under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Safe Drinking Water Act, and Superfund.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Freeman, A. Myrick. "Environmental Policy Since Earth Day I: What Do We Know About the Benefits and Costs?" Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 31, no. 1 (April 2002): 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1068280500003427.

Full text

Abstract:

Data on costs and benefits of the major environmental laws passed during the 1970s are reviewed. The winners in terms of benefit-cost analysis include: getting lead out of gasoline, controlling particulate air pollution, reducing the concentration of lead in drinking water, and the cleanup of hazardous waste sites with the lowest cost per cancer case avoided under Superfund. The losers include: mobile source air pollution control, water pollution control, and many of the regulations and cleanup decisions taken under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Safe Drinking Water Act, and Superfund.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Campbell, John M. "Financing Liabilities Under Superfund1." Risk Analysis 9, no. 3 (September 1989): 341–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1989.tb00999.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Katzman, Martin T. "Financing Liabilities Under Superfund1." Risk Analysis 9, no. 3 (September 1989): 345–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1989.tb01000.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Crawford, Mark. "Superfund Program Under Fire." Science 240, no. 4860 (June 24, 1988): 1725. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.240.4860.1725.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Gascoyne, Stephen. "Slipcovering a Superfund Site." Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 49, no. 7 (September 1993): 33–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00963402.1993.11456384.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Anderton, Douglas L., John Michael Oakes, and Karla L. Egan. "Environmental Equity in Superfund." Evaluation Review 21, no. 1 (February 1997): 3–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0193841x9702100101.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Anderson, Dan R. "Financing Liabilities Under Superfund." Risk Analysis 9, no. 3 (September 1989): 329–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1989.tb00998.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Gustavson, Karl E., Lawrence W. Barnthouse, Corale L. Brierley, Edwin H. Clark, II II, and C. Herb Ward. "Superfund and Mining Megasites." Environmental Science & Technology 41, no. 8 (April 2007): 2667–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es0725091.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Perkins, John H. "Editorial: Superfund Superbowl XXII." Environmental Practice 4, no. 2 (June 2002): 55–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1466046602021002.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

HOGUE, CHERYL. "Superfund Mine Cleanup Assured." Chemical & Engineering News 78, no. 44 (October 30, 2000): 10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cen-v078n044.p010.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

HANSON, DAVID J. "Superfund Takes A Hit." Chemical & Engineering News 87, no. 20 (May 18, 2009): 39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cen-v087n020.p039.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

REISCH, MARC. "Superfund Collects $212 Million." Chemical & Engineering News 79, no. 38 (September 17, 2001): 10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cen-v079n038.p010a.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

EMBER, LOIS. "Industry coalition slams Superfund." Chemical & Engineering News 71, no. 31 (August 2, 1993): 19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cen-v071n031.p019.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

EMBER, LOIS. "Superfund liability consensus sought." Chemical & Engineering News 72, no. 3 (January 17, 1994): 6–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cen-v072n003.p006.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

EMBER, LOIS. "Administration proposes Superfund revisions." Chemical & Engineering News 72, no. 6 (February 7, 1994): 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cen-v072n006.p007a.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Josephson, Julian. "ES Views: Implementing Superfund." Environmental Science & Technology 20, no. 1 (January 1986): 23–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es00143a601.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Hirschhorn, Joel S. "Editorial: Superfund: What’s new?" Environmental Science & Technology 21, no. 3 (March 1987): 219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es00157a603.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Miller, Stanton. "Superfund: An environmental boondoggle." Environmental Science & Technology 23, no. 4 (April 1989): 394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es00181a601.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Kagels, Raymond S. "Structured settlements under superfund." Environmental Claims Journal 4, no. 3 (March 1992): 349–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10406029209379169.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Xu, Grace. "Writhing of a Superfund." Chest 153, no. 5 (May 2018): 1277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2017.09.039.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Nott, SamuelL. "Implementing the new Superfund." Journal of Hazardous Materials 18, no. 3 (January 1988): 229–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3894(88)85031-3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Grumbly, Thomas P. "DOE initiatives: Superfund reform." Federal Facilities Environmental Journal 7, no. 1 (1996): 119–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ffej.3330070110.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Robinson, Gabrielle L., Gary L. Mills, Angela H. Lindell, Sara H. Schweitzer, and Sonia M. Hernandez. "Exposure to mercury and Aroclor 1268 congeners in least terns (Sternula antillarum) in coastal Georgia, USA." Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts 17, no. 8 (2015): 1424–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c5em00183h.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Nagisetty, Raja M., William B. Macgregor, David Hutchins, Daniel A. Autenrieth, and Alyssa M. Plant. "Effects of Residential Environmental Screening and Perception Surveys on Superfund Environmental Health Risk Perceptions." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 13 (July 2, 2022): 8146. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19138146.

Full text

Abstract:

Residents at one of the nation’s largest and longest-operating Superfund sites (Butte, Montana) have expressed environmental health risk perceptions that often diverge from those of EPA and other official stakeholders responsible for the investigation and remediation of site contamination aimed at protecting human health and the environment. A random sample of Butte residents participated in a study of how home-based environmental screening influences environmental health perceptions. Participants completed surveys measuring environmental health perceptions before and after a home site screening of soil and drinking water for lead and arsenic conducted by the research team. Local air monitoring for the same contaminants was also completed during the study period. The home-based screening intervention improved the alignment of subjective participant environmental health perceptions with objective environmental screening measures. Key features of the process that helped achieve this effect included (1) co-locating the collection of participant perceptions and individualized screening measurements; (2) sharing environmental screening results in a clear and unbiased manner; and (3) conducting this work independent of agencies and organizations with direct responsibility for Superfund-related cleanup activities. Empowering residents of a Superfund community with knowledge of the specific kinds and levels of environmental contamination in their home environment may help overcome the gap between agency conclusions regarding environmental health risk and the perceptions of community members.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!