Journal articles on the topic 'Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation (STN-DBS)'
To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation (STN-DBS).
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation (STN-DBS).'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Walker, Harrison C., Ray L. Watts, Christian J. Schrandt, He Huang, Stephanie L. Guthrie, Barton L. Guthrie, and Erwin B. Montgomery. "Activation of subthalamic neurons by contralateral subthalamic deep brain stimulation in Parkinson disease." Journal of Neurophysiology 105, no. 3 (March 2011): 1112–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00266.2010.
Full textAbstract:
Multiple studies have shown bilateral improvement in motor symptoms in Parkinson disease (PD) following unilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and internal segment of the globus pallidus, yet the mechanism(s) underlying this phenomenon are poorly understood. We hypothesized that STN neuronal activity is altered by contralateral STN DBS. This hypothesis was tested intraoperatively in humans with advanced PD using microelectrode recordings of the STN during contralateral STN DBS. We demonstrate alterations in the discharge pattern of STN neurons in response to contralateral STN DBS including short latency, temporally precise, stimulation frequency-independent responses consistent with antidromic activation. Furthermore, the total discharge frequency during contralateral high frequency stimulation (160 Hz) was greater than during low frequency stimulation (30 Hz) and the resting state. These findings demonstrate complex responses to DBS and imply that output activation throughout the basal ganglia-thalamic-cortical network rather than local inhibition is a therapeutic mechanism of DBS.
2
Honey, Christopher R., Clement Hamani, Suneil K. Kalia, Tejas Sankar, Marina Picillo, Renato P. Munhoz, Alfonso Fasano, and Michel Panisset. "Deep Brain Stimulation Target Selection for Parkinson’s Disease." Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques 44, no. 1 (March 15, 2016): 3–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2016.22.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractDuring the “DBS Canada Day” symposium held in Toronto July 4-5, 2014, the scientific committee invited experts to discuss three main questions on target selection for deep brain stimulation (DBS) of patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). First, is the subthalamic nucleus (STN) or the globus pallidus internus (GPi) the ideal target? In summary, both targets are equally effective in improving the motor symptoms of PD. STN allows a greater medications reduction, while GPi exerts a direct antidyskinetic effect. Second, are there further potential targets? Ventral intermediate nucleus DBS has significant long-term benefit for tremor control but insufficiently addresses other motor features of PD. DBS in the posterior subthalamic area also reduces tremor. The pedunculopontine nucleus remains an investigational target. Third, should DBS for PD be performed unilaterally, bilaterally or staged? Unilateral STN DBS can be proposed to asymmetric patients. There is no evidence that a staged bilateral approach reduces the incidence of DBS-related adverse events.
3
Tambirajoo, Kantharuby, Luciano Furlanetti, Michael Samuel, and Keyoumars Ashkan. "Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Post-Infarct Dystonia." Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery 98, no. 6 (2020): 386–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000509317.
Full textAbstract:
Dystonia secondary to cerebral infarcts presents months to years after the initial insult, is usually unilateral and causes significant morbidity. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) is established as the most frequent target in the management of the dystonic symptoms. We report our experience with subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS in 3 patients with post-infarct dystonia, in whom GPi DBS was not confidently possible due to the presence of striatal infarcts. Two patients had unilateral STN DBS implantation, whereas the third patient had bilateral STN DBS implantation for bilateral dystonic symptoms. Prospectively collected preoperative and postoperative functional assessment data including imaging, medication and neuropsychology evaluations were analyzed with regard to symptom improvement. Median follow-up period was 38.3 months (range 26–43 months). All patients had clinically valuable improvements in dystonic symptoms and pain control despite variable improvements in the Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia rating scores. In our series, we have demonstrated that STN DBS could be an alternative in the management of post-infarct dystonia in patients with abnormal striatal anatomy which precludes GPi DBS. A multidisciplinary team-based approach is essential for patient selection and management.
4
Nakano, Naoki, Mamoru Taneda, Akira Watanabe, and Amami Kato. "Computed Three-Dimensional Atlas of Subthalamic Nucleus and Its Adjacent Structures for Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease." ISRN Neurology 2012 (January 12, 2012): 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/592678.
Full textAbstract:
Background. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is one of the standard surgical treatments for advanced Parkinson's disease. However, it has been difficult to accurately localize the stimulated contact area of the electrode in the subthalamic nucleus and its adjacent structures using a two-dimensional atlas. The goal of this study is to verify the real and detailed localization of stimulated contact of the DBS electrode therapeutically inserted into the STN and its adjacent structures using a novel computed three-dimensional atlas built by a personal computer. Method. A three-dimensional atlas of the STN and its adjacent structures (3D-Subthalamus atlas) was elaborated on the basis of sagittal slices from the Schaltenbrand and Wahren stereotactic atlas on a personal computer utilizing a commercial software. The electrode inserted into the STN and its adjacent structures was superimposed on our 3D-Subthalamus atlas based on intraoperative third ventriculography in 11 cases. Findings. Accurate localization of the DBS electrode was identified using the 3D-Subthalamus atlas, and its clinical efficacy of the electrode stimulation was investigated in all 11 cases. Conclusion. This study demonstrates that the 3D-Subthalamus atlas is a useful tool for understanding the morphology of deep brain structures and for the precise anatomical position findings of the stimulated contact of a DBS electrode. The clinical analysis using the 3D atlas supports the contention that the stimulation of structures adjacent to the STN, particularly the zona incerta or the field of Forel H, is as effective as the stimulation of the STN itself for the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease.
5
Amirnovin, Ramin, Ziv M. Williams, G. Rees Cosgrove, and Emad N. Eskandar. "Experience with Microelectrode Guided Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation." Operative Neurosurgery 58, suppl_1 (February 1, 2006): ONS—96—ONS—102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000192690.45680.c2.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract OBJECTIVE: Subthalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) has rapidly become the standard surgical therapy for medically refractory Parkinson disease. However, in spite of its wide acceptance, there is considerable variability in the technical approach. This study details our technique and experience in performing microelectrode recording (MER) guided subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS in the treatment of Parkinson disease. METHODS: Forty patients underwent surgery for the implantation of 70 STN DBS electrodes. Stereotactic localization was performed using a combination of magnetic resonance and computed tomographic imaging. We used an array of three microelectrodes, separated by 2 mm, for physiological localization of the STN. The final location was selected based on MER and macrostimulation through the DBS electrode. RESULTS: The trajectory selected for the DBS electrode had an average pass through the STN of 5.6 ± 0.4 mm on the left and 5.7 ± 0.4 mm on the right. The predicted location was used in 42% of the cases but was modified by MER in the remaining 58%. Patients were typically discharged on the second postoperative day. Eighty-five percent of patients were sent home, 13% required short-term rehabilitation, and one patient required long-term nursing services. Seven complications occurred over 4 years. Four patients suffered small hemorrhages, one patient experienced a lead migration, one developed an infection of the pulse generator, and one patient suffered from a superficial cranial infection. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous bilateral MER-guided subthalamic DBS is a relatively safe and well-tolerated procedure. MER plays an important role in optimal localization of the DBS electrodes.
6
Zeiler, F. A., M. Wilkinson, and J. P. Krcek. "Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation: An Invaluable Role for MER." Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques 40, no. 4 (July 2013): 572–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0317167100014682.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract:Introduction:Subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is currently the main surgical procedure for medically refractory Parkinson's disease. The benefit of intra-operative microelectrode recording (MER) for the purpose of neurophysiological localization and mapping of the STN continues to be debated.Methods:A retrospective review of the charts and operative reports of all patients receiving STN DBS implantation for Parkinson's disease at our institution from January 2004 to March 2011 was done.Results:Data from 43 of 44 patients with Parkinson's disease treated with STN DBS were reviewed. The average number of tracts on the left was 2.4, versus 2.3 on the right. The average dorsal and ventral anatomical boundaries of the STN based on Schaltenbrand's Stereotactic Atlas were estimated to be at -5.0 mm above and +1.4 mm below target respectively. The average dorsal and ventral boundaries of the STN using MER were -2.6 mm above and +2.0 mm below target respectively. The average dorsal-ventral distance of the STN as predicted by Stereotactic Atlas was 6.4 mm, compared to 4.6 mm as determined by MER. MER demonstrated the average dorsal and ventral boundaries on the left side were -2.6 mm and +2.2 mm from target respectively, while the average dorsal and ventral boundaries on the right side were -2.5 mm and +1.8 mm from target respectively with MER.Conclusions:MER in STN DBS surgery demonstrated measurable difference between stereotactic atlas/MRI STN target and neurophysiologic STN localization.
7
Ostrem, Jill L., Marta San Luciano, Kristen A. Dodenhoff, Nathan Ziman, Leslie C. Markun, Caroline A. Racine, Coralie de Hemptinne, Monica M. Volz, Susan L. Heath, and Philip A. Starr. "Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in isolated dystonia." Neurology 88, no. 1 (November 30, 2016): 25–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000003451.
Full textAbstract:
Objective:To report long-term safety and efficacy outcomes of a large cohort of patients with medically refractory isolated dystonia treated with subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS).Methods:Twenty patients (12 male, 8 female; mean age 49 ± 16.3 years) with medically refractory isolated dystonia were studied (14 were followed for 36 months). The primary endpoints were change in Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) motor score and Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) total score at 36 months compared to preoperative baseline. Multiple secondary outcomes were also assessed (ClinicalTrials.govNCT00773604).Results:Eighteen of 20 patients showed improvement 12 months after STN DBS with sustained benefit persisting for 3 years (n = 14). At 36 months, BFMDRS motor scores improved 70.4% from a mean 17.9 ± 8.5 to 5.3 ± 5.6 (p = 0.0002) and total TWSTRS scores improved 66.6% from a mean 41.0 ± 18.9 to 13.7 ± 17.9 (p = 0.0002). Improvement at 36 months was equivalent to that seen at 6 months. Disability and quality of life measures were also improved. Three hardware-related and 24 stimulation-related nonserious adverse events occurred between years 1 and 3 (including 4 patients with dyskinesia).Conclusions:This study offers support for long-term tolerability and sustained effectiveness of STN DBS in the treatment of severe forms of isolated dystonia.Classification of evidence:This study provides Class IV evidence that STN DBS decreases long-term dystonia severity in patients with medically refractory isolated dystonia.
8
Mosley, Philip E., Saee Paliwal, Katherine Robinson, Terry Coyne, Peter Silburn, Marc Tittgemeyer, Klaas E. Stephan, Alistair Perry, and Michael Breakspear. "The structural connectivity of subthalamic deep brain stimulation correlates with impulsivity in Parkinson’s disease." Brain 143, no. 7 (June 22, 2020): 2235–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaa148.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract Subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) for Parkinson’s disease treats motor symptoms and improves quality of life, but can be complicated by adverse neuropsychiatric side-effects, including impulsivity. Several clinically important questions remain unclear: can ‘at-risk’ patients be identified prior to DBS; do neuropsychiatric symptoms relate to the distribution of the stimulation field; and which brain networks are responsible for the evolution of these symptoms? Using a comprehensive neuropsychiatric battery and a virtual casino to assess impulsive behaviour in a naturalistic fashion, 55 patients with Parkinson’s disease (19 females, mean age 62, mean Hoehn and Yahr stage 2.6) were assessed prior to STN-DBS and 3 months postoperatively. Reward evaluation and response inhibition networks were reconstructed with probabilistic tractography using the participant-specific subthalamic volume of activated tissue as a seed. We found that greater connectivity of the stimulation site with these frontostriatal networks was related to greater postoperative impulsiveness and disinhibition as assessed by the neuropsychiatric instruments. Larger bet sizes in the virtual casino postoperatively were associated with greater connectivity of the stimulation site with right and left orbitofrontal cortex, right ventromedial prefrontal cortex and left ventral striatum. For all assessments, the baseline connectivity of reward evaluation and response inhibition networks prior to STN-DBS was not associated with postoperative impulsivity; rather, these relationships were only observed when the stimulation field was incorporated. This suggests that the site and distribution of stimulation is a more important determinant of postoperative neuropsychiatric outcomes than preoperative brain structure and that stimulation acts to mediate impulsivity through differential recruitment of frontostriatal networks. Notably, a distinction could be made amongst participants with clinically-significant, harmful changes in mood and behaviour attributable to DBS, based upon an analysis of connectivity and its relationship with gambling behaviour. Additional analyses suggested that this distinction may be mediated by the differential involvement of fibres connecting ventromedial subthalamic nucleus and orbitofrontal cortex. These findings identify a mechanistic substrate of neuropsychiatric impairment after STN-DBS and suggest that tractography could be used to predict the incidence of adverse neuropsychiatric effects. Clinically, these results highlight the importance of accurate electrode placement and careful stimulation titration in the prevention of neuropsychiatric side-effects after STN-DBS.
9
Pham, Uyen, Anne-Kristin Solbakk, Inger-Marie Skogseid, Mathias Toft, Are Hugo Pripp, Ane Eidahl Konglund, Stein Andersson, et al. "Personality Changes after Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson’s Disease." Parkinson's Disease 2015 (2015): 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/490507.
Full textAbstract:
Objectives. Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) is a recognized therapy that improves motor symptoms in advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, little is known about its impact on personality. To address this topic, we have assessed personality traits before and after STN-DBS in PD patients.Methods. Forty patients with advanced PD were assessed with the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI): the Urgency, Premeditation, Perseverance, Sensation Seeking impulsive behaviour scale (UPPS), and the Neuroticism and Lie subscales of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ-N, EPQ-L) before surgery and after three months of STN-DBS. Collateral information obtained from the UPPS was also reported.Results. Despite improvement in motor function and reduction in dopaminergic dosage patients reported lower score on the TCI Persistence and Self-Transcendence scales, after three months of STN-DBS, compared to baseline (P=0.006;P=0.024). Relatives reported significantly increased scores on the UPPS Lack of Premeditation scale at follow-up (P=0.027).Conclusion. STN-DBS in PD patients is associated with personality changes in the direction of increased impulsivity.
10
Miocinovic, Svjetlana, Martin Parent, Christopher R. Butson, Philip J. Hahn, Gary S. Russo, Jerrold L. Vitek, and Cameron C. McIntyre. "Computational Analysis of Subthalamic Nucleus and Lenticular Fasciculus Activation During Therapeutic Deep Brain Stimulation." Journal of Neurophysiology 96, no. 3 (September 2006): 1569–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00305.2006.
Full textAbstract:
The subthalamic nucleus (STN) is the most common target for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD) with deep brain stimulation (DBS). DBS of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) is also effective in the treatment of PD. The output fibers of the GPi that form the lenticular fasciculus pass in close proximity to STN DBS electrodes. In turn, both STN projection neurons and GPi fibers of passage represent possible therapeutic targets of DBS in the STN region. We built a comprehensive computational model of STN DBS in parkinsonian macaques to study the effects of stimulation in a controlled environment. The model consisted of three fundamental components: 1) a three-dimensional (3D) anatomical model of the macaque basal ganglia, 2) a finite element model of the DBS electrode and electric field transmitted to the tissue medium, and 3) multicompartment biophysical models of STN projection neurons, GPi fibers of passage, and internal capsule fibers of passage. Populations of neurons were positioned within the 3D anatomical model. Neurons were stimulated with electrode positions and stimulation parameters defined as clinically effective in two parkinsonian monkeys. The model predicted axonal activation of STN neurons and GPi fibers during STN DBS. Model predictions regarding the degree of GPi fiber activation matched well with experimental recordings in both monkeys. Only axonal activation of the STN neurons showed a statistically significant increase in both monkeys when comparing clinically effective and ineffective stimulation. Nonetheless, both neural targets may play important roles in the therapeutic mechanisms of STN DBS.
11
Mehanna, Raja, Jawad A. Bajwa, Hubert Fernandez, and Aparna Ashutosh Wagle Shukla. "Cognitive Impact of Deep Brain Stimulation on Parkinson’s Disease Patients." Parkinson's Disease 2017 (2017): 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/3085140.
Full textAbstract:
Subthalamic nucleus (STN) or globus pallidus interna (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is considered a robust therapeutic tool in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients, although it has been reported to potentially cause cognitive decline in some cases. We here provide an in-depth and critical review of the current literature regarding cognition after DBS in PD, summarizing the available data on the impact of STN and GPi DBS as monotherapies and also comparative data across these two therapies on 7 cognitive domains. We provide evidence that, in appropriately screened PD patients, worsening of one or more cognitive functions is rare and subtle after DBS, without negative impact on quality of life, and that there is very little data supporting that STN DBS has a worse cognitive outcome than GPi DBS.
12
Wagle Shukla, Aparna, Jill L. Ostrem, David E. Vaillancourt, Robert Chen, Kelly D. Foote, and Michael S. Okun. "Physiological effects of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation surgery in cervical dystonia." Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 89, no. 12 (January 11, 2018): 1296–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2017-317098.
Full textAbstract:
BackgroundSubthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) surgery is clinically effective for treatment of cervical dystonia; however, the underlying physiology has not been examined. We used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to examine the effects of STN DBS on sensorimotor integration, sensorimotor plasticity and motor cortex excitability, which are identified as the key pathophysiological features underlying dystonia.MethodsTMS paradigms of short latency afferent inhibition (SAI) and long latency afferent inhibition (LAI) were used to examine the sensorimotor integration. Sensorimotor plasticity was measured with paired associative stimulation paradigm, and motor cortex excitability was examined with short interval intracortical inhibition and intracortical facilitation. DBS was turned off and on to record these measures.ResultsSTN DBS modulated SAI and LAI, which correlated well with the acute clinical improvement. While there were no changes seen in the motor cortex excitability, DBS was found to normalise the sensorimotor plasticity; however, there was no clinical correlation.ConclusionModulation of sensorimotor integration is a key contributor to clinical improvement with acute stimulation of STN. Since the motor cortex excitability did not change and the change in sensorimotor plasticity did not correlate with clinical improvement, STN DBS demonstrates restricted effects on the underlying physiology.Clinical trial registrationNCT01671527.
13
Bove, Francesco, Valerie Fraix, Francesco Cavallieri, Emmanuelle Schmitt, Eugénie Lhommée, Amélie Bichon, Sara Meoni, et al. "Dementia and subthalamic deep brain stimulation in Parkinson disease." Neurology 95, no. 4 (July 1, 2020): e384-e392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000009822.
Full textAbstract:
ObjectivesTo assess the prevalence and the cumulative incidence of dementia at short-, medium- and long-term follow-up after deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) (at 1, 5, and 10 years) and to evaluate potential risk factors for postoperative dementia.MethodsThe presence of dementia (according to the DSM-V) was retrospectively evaluated at each postoperative follow-up in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) who underwent bilateral STN-DBS. Preoperative and perioperative risk factors of developing postoperative dementia were also investigated. Demographic data, disease features, medications, comorbidities, nonmotor symptoms, PD motor scales, neuropsychological scales at baseline, and perioperative complications were collected for each patient.ResultsA total of 175 patients were included, and 104 were available at 10-year follow-up. Dementia prevalence was 2.3% at 1 year, 8.5% at 5 years, and 29.8% at 10 years. Dementia cumulative incidence at 1, 5, and 10 years was 2.3%, 10.9%, and 25.7%, respectively. The corresponding dementia incidence rate was 35.6 per 1,000 person-years. Male sex, higher age, hallucinations, lower frontal score at baseline, and perioperative cerebral hemorrhage were predictors of dementia.ConclusionsIn patients with PD with longstanding STN-DBS, dementia prevalence and incidence are not higher than those reported in the general PD population. Except for few patients with perioperative cerebral hemorrhage, STN-DBS is cognitively safe, and does not provide dementia risk factors in addition to those reported for PD itself. Identification of dementia predictors in this population may improve patient selection and information concerning the risk of poor cognitive outcome.
14
Aygun, Dursun, Ersoy Kocabicak, Onur Yildiz, Musa Kazim Onar, Hatice Guz, Omer Boke, Murat Kurt, and Yasin Temel. "Syncope Associated with Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in a Patient with Parkinson’s Disease." Case Reports in Neurological Medicine 2013 (2013): 1–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/371929.
Full textAbstract:
In advanced Parkinson's disease (PD), deep brain stimulation (DBS) may be an alternative option for the treatment of motor symptoms. Side effects associated with subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS in patients with PD are emerging as the most frequent sensory and motor symptoms. DBS-related syncope is reported as extremely rare. We wanted to discuss the mechanisms of syncope associated with STN DBS in a patient with Parkinson's disease.Case report.Sixty-three-year-old female patient is followed up with diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease for 6 years in our clinic. The patient has undergone STN DBS due to painful dystonia and drug resistant tremor. During the operation, when the left STN was stimulated at 5 milliampere (mAmp), the patient developed presyncopal symptoms. However, when the stimulation was stopped symptoms improved. During the early period after the operation, when the right STN was stimulated at 1.3 millivolts (mV), she developed the pre-yncopal symptoms and then syncope. Our case shows that STN DBS may lead to directly autonomic symptoms resulting in syncope during stimulation-on (stim-on).
15
Bot, Maarten, P. Richard Schuurman, Vincent J. J. Odekerken, Rens Verhagen, Fiorella Maria Contarino, Rob M. A. De Bie, and Pepijn van den Munckhof. "Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: defining the optimal location within the subthalamic nucleus." Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 89, no. 5 (January 20, 2018): 493–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2017-316907.
Full textAbstract:
BackgroundIndividual motor improvement after deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for Parkinson’s disease (PD) varies considerably. Stereotactic targeting of the dorsolateral sensorimotor part of the STN is considered paramount for maximising effectiveness, but studies employing the midcommissural point (MCP) as anatomical reference failed to show correlation between DBS location and motor improvement. The medial border of the STN as reference may provide better insight in the relationship between DBS location and clinical outcome.MethodsMotor improvement after 12 months of 65 STN DBS electrodes was categorised into non-responding, responding and optimally responding body-sides. Stereotactic coordinates of optimal electrode contacts relative to both medial STN border and MCP served to define theoretic DBS ‘hotspots’.ResultsUsing the medial STN border as reference, significant negative correlation (Pearson’s correlation −0.52, P<0.01) was found between the Euclidean distance from the centre of stimulation to this DBS hotspot and motor improvement. This hotspot was located at 2.8 mm lateral, 1.7 mm anterior and 2.5 mm superior relative to the medial STN border. Using MCP as reference, no correlation was found.ConclusionThe medial STN border proved superior compared with MCP as anatomical reference for correlation of DBS location and motor improvement, and enabled defining an optimal DBS location within the nucleus. We therefore propose the medial STN border as a better individual reference point than the currently used MCP on preoperative stereotactic imaging, in order to obtain optimal and thus less variable motor improvement for individual patients with PD following STN DBS.
16
Kim, Han-Joon, Beom S. Jeon, Sun Ha Paek, Jee-Young Lee, Hee Jin Kim, Chi Kyung Kim, and Dong Gyu Kim. "Bilateral Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson Disease Patients With Severe Tremor." Neurosurgery 67, no. 3 (September 1, 2010): 626–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000374850.98949.d4.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract BACKGROUND Previous studies have shown that subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) improves tremor in Parkinson disease (PD). However, the patients included in those studies were unselected for tremor severity. OBJECTIVE We specifically assessed the effect of STN DBS on tremor in selected PD patients with severe tremor. METHODS Seventy-two PD patients who had received bilateral STN DBS were included. The effects of STN DBS on the off-medication tremor, the on-medication tremor, and the off-medication action tremor in patients selected as the worst one-third in each category at baseline were evaluated after a mean duration of > 2 years. RESULTS In patients with severe off-medication tremor, off-medication tremor score improved from 12.28 ± 2.80 at baseline to 1.93 ± 2.85 at the last follow-up (P < .001). The off-medication tremor in the off-stimulation state at the last follow-up was less severe than the preoperative off-medication tremor. In patients with severe on-medication tremor, on-medication tremor score improved from 6.17 ± 2.45 to 1.35 ± 2.58 (P < .001). In patients with severe off-medication action tremor, off-medication action tremor score improved from 5.08 ± 1.35 to 1.24 ± 1.42 (P < .001). CONCLUSION STN DBS is effective for severe off- and on-medication tremor and off-medication action tremor in PD. Our findings suggest that STN DBS reduces PD tremor through, at least in part, its effect on the tremor-generating mechanism independent of dopaminergic transmission and that long-term electrical stimulation of STN might induce a structural or neurochemical change leading to the improvement of tremor.
17
Sung, Victor W., Ray L. Watts, Christian J. Schrandt, Stephanie Guthrie, Deli Wang, Amy W. Amara, Barton L. Guthrie, and Harrison C. Walker. "The relationship between clinical phenotype and early staged bilateral deep brain stimulation in Parkinson disease." Journal of Neurosurgery 119, no. 6 (December 2013): 1530–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2013.8.jns122025.
Full textAbstract:
Object While many centers place bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems simultaneously, unilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS followed by a staged contralateral procedure has emerged as a treatment option for many patients. However, little is known about whether the preoperative phenotype predicts when staged placement of a DBS electrode in the opposite STN will be required. The authors aimed to determine whether preoperative clinical phenotype predicts early staged placement of a second STN DBS electrode in patients who undergo unilateral STN DBS for Parkinson disease (PD). Methods Eighty-two consecutive patients with advanced PD underwent unilateral STN DBS contralateral to the most affected hemibody and had at least 2 years of follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression analysis determined preoperative characteristics that predicted staged placement of a second electrode in the opposite STN. Preoperative measurements included aspects of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), motor asymmetry index, and body weight. Results At 2-year follow-up, 28 (34%) of the 82 patients had undergone staged placement of a contralateral electrode while the remainder chose to continue with unilateral stimulation. Statistically significant improvements in UPDRS total and Part 3 scores were retained at the end of the 2-year follow-up period in both subsets of patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the most important predictors for early staged placement of a second subthalamic stimulator were low asymmetry index (OR 13.4, 95% CI 2.8–64.9), high tremor subscore (OR 7.2, CI 1.5–35.0), and low body weight (OR 5.5, 95% CI 1.4–22.3). Conclusions This single-center study provides evidence that elements of the preoperative PD phenotype predict whether patients will require early staged bilateral STN DBS. These data may aid in the management of patients with advanced PD who undergo STN DBS.
18
Santyr, B., M. Cohn, J. Germann, A. Ajala, J. Qiu, A. Boutet, and A. Lozano. "P.097 Effect of stimulation site on brain network activity and phonemic verbal fluency: an fMRI study." Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques 50, s2 (June 2023): S83—S84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2023.192.
Full textAbstract:
Background: In Parkinson’s disease, deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) or globus pallidus internus (GPi) produces comparable motor benefits. Although both increases the risk of cognition and verbal fluency (VF) decline, the risk is greater following STN-DBS. The consequences of stimulating these different sites on brain network activity is unknown. We use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during in vivo stimulation to investigate differences between STN-DBS and GPi-DBS and correlate with change in VF. Methods: Left-sided, stimulation-cycling block-design fMRI was acquired at 3-Tesla in 51 STN-DBS and 15 GPi-DBS following routine clinical programming. Blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) response to stimulation was compared between groups. Phonemic VF was assessed pre- and postoperatively. Results: Voxel-wise t-test between STN-DBS and GPi-DBS BOLD response maps revealed areas of significant difference (p<0.001) in the left frontal operculum and the left caudate head. Stimulation BOLD response appears to show slight inverse correlation with postoperative VF decline. The trend is reversed at the left frontal operculum in STN-DBS compared to GPi-DBS. Conclusions: Decline in VF in PD-DBS seems associated with the stimulation BOLD response at the left frontal operculum and the left caudate head. The effect differs depending on stimulation site, suggesting differing effects on brain network activity.
19
Follett, Kenneth A. "Comparison of pallidal and subthalamic deep brain stimulation for the treatment of levodopa-induced dyskinesias." Neurosurgical Focus 17, no. 1 (July 2004): 14–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/foc.2004.17.1.3.
Full textAbstract:
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) can relieve dyskinesias effectively and safely. This modality is applied most commonly in the treatment of dyskinesias associated with levodopa therapy for Parkinson disease. The subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus internus (GPi) are the most common surgical targets. Deep brain stimulation of the GP has a direct antidyskinetic effect, whereas relief of dyskinesias by DBS of the STN depends on postoperative reduction of dopaminergic medications. Outcomes are similar for DBS in these two sites despite the different mechanisms by which the stimulation relieves dyskinesias. Deep brain stimulation of the STN has become the surgical treatment of choice in many movement disorders programs but this modality has not been compared with DBS of the GPi in randomized controlled trials, and the superiority of one site over the other remains unproven. In the absence of data demonstrating superiority, selection of the stimulation target should be individualized to meet the needs of each patient. Selection of the target should be based on the patient's most disabling symptoms, response to medications (including side effects), and the goals of therapy, with consideration given to the different antidyskinetic effects of DBS of the STN and GPi.
20
Fagundes, Valéria de Carvalho, Carlos R. M. Rieder, Aline Nunes da Cruz, Bárbara Costa Beber, and Mirna Wetters Portuguez. "Deep Brain Stimulation Frequency of the Subthalamic Nucleus Affects Phonemic and Action Fluency in Parkinson’s Disease." Parkinson's Disease 2016 (2016): 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6760243.
Full textAbstract:
Introduction.Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) in Parkinson’s disease (PD) has been linked to a decline in verbal fluency. The decline can be attributed to surgical effects, but the relative contributions of the stimulation parameters are not well understood. This study aimed to investigate the impact of the frequency of STN-DBS on the performance of verbal fluency tasks in patients with PD.Methods.Twenty individuals with PD who received bilateral STN-DBS were evaluated. Their performances of verbal fluency tasks (semantic, phonemic, action, and unconstrained fluencies) upon receiving low-frequency (60 Hz) and high-frequency (130 Hz) STN-DBS were assessed.Results.The performances of phonemic and action fluencies were significantly different between low- and high-frequency STN-DBS. Patients showed a decrease in these verbal fluencies for high-frequency STN-DBS.Conclusion.Low-frequency STN-DBS may be less harmful to the verbal fluency of PD patients.
21
Amstutz, Deborah, Steffen Paschen, Martin Lenard Lachenmayer, Marie Elise Maradan-Gachet, Günther Deuschl, Paul Krack, and Ines Debove. "Management of Impulse Control Disorders with Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson’s Disease." CNS & Neurological Disorders - Drug Targets 19, no. 8 (December 24, 2020): 611–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1871527319666200720105553.
Full textAbstract:
Impulse Control Disorders (ICDs) and related disorders are common side effects of dopaminergic treatment in Parkinson’s Disease (PD) and are associated with negative effects on mental and physical health, quality of life and interpersonal relationships. Current management options are limited, as a reduction of dopaminergic medication often leads to worsening of motor symptoms or dopamine agonist withdrawal syndrome. The aim of this review was to investigate if ICDs improve, worsen, or remain stable after Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation (STN-DBS). We reviewed retrospective, prospective and randomized-controlled studies published between 2000 and 2019 examining the effect of STN-DBS on one or more ICDs. The number of participants, time of follow-up, methods used to measure ICDs, type of ICDs, the incidence of ICDs before STN-DBS, the incidence of improvement (remission or reduction) of ICDs after STN-DBS, the incidence of de novo ICDs after STN-DBS, stimulation parameters, lead position, change in motor score and change in medication are reported for each study. Available studies suggest that ICDs improve after STN-DBS in most patients and that persisting new-onset ICDs induced by STN-DBS are rare. However, more randomized-controlled studies are needed to confirm the findings and to further investigate the underlying mechanisms.
22
Lundgren, Sofie, Thomas Saeys, Fredrik Karlsson, Katarina Olofsson, Patric Blomstedt, Jan Linder, Erik Nordh, Hamayun Zafar, and Jan van Doorn. "Deep Brain Stimulation of Caudal Zona Incerta and Subthalamic Nucleus in Patients with Parkinson's Disease: Effects on Voice Intensity." Parkinson's Disease 2011 (2011): 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/658956.
Full textAbstract:
Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) affects speech inconsistently. Recently, stimulation of the caudal zona incerta (cZi-DBS) has shown superior motor outcomes for PD patients, but effects on speech have not been systematically investigated. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of cZi-DBS and STN-DBS on voice intensity in PD patients. Mean intensity during reading and intensity decay during rapid syllable repetition were measured for STN-DBS and cZi-DBS patients (eight patients per group), before- and 12 months after-surgery on- and off-stimulation. For mean intensity, there were small significant differences on- versus off-stimulation in each group: 74.2 (2.0) dB contra 72.1 (2.2) dB () for STN-DBS, and 71.6 (4.1) dB contra 72.8 (3.4) dB () for cZi-DBS, with significant interaction (). Intensity decay showed no significant changes. The subtle differences found for mean intensity suggest that STN-DBS and cZi-DBS may influence voice intensity differently.
23
Garraux, Gaëtan, Mohamed A. Bahri, Christian Lemaire, Christian Degueldre, Eric Salmon, and Bruno Kaschten. "Brain energization in response to deep brain stimulation of subthalamic nuclei in Parkinson's disease." Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 31, no. 7 (April 6, 2011): 1612–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2011.41.
Full textAbstract:
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an effective treatment in a subgroup of medically refractory patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Here, we compared resting-state 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography images in the stimulator off (DBS_OFF) and on (DBS_ON) conditions in eight PD patients in an unmedicated state, on average 2 years after bilateral electrode implantation. Global standardized uptake value (SUV) significantly increased by ∼11% in response to STN-DBS. To avoid any bias in the voxel-based analysis comparing DBS_ON and DBS_OFF conditions, individual scan intensity was scaled to a region where FDG-SUV did not differ significantly between conditions. The resulting FDG-SUV ratio (FDG-SUVR) was found to increase in many regions in response to STN-DBS including the target area of surgery, caudate nuclei, primary sensorimotor, and associative cortices. Contrary to previous studies, we could not find any regional decrease in FDG-SUVR. These findings were indirectly supported by comparing the extent of areas with depressed FDG-SUVR in DBS_OFF and DBS_ON relatively to 10 normal controls. Altogether, these novel results support the prediction that the effect of STN-DBS on brain activity in PD is unidirectional and consists in an increase in many subcortical and cortical regions.
24
Wöhrle, Johannes C., Christian Blahak, Hans-Holger Capelle, Wolfgang Fogel, Hansjoerg Bäzner, and Joachim K. Krauss. "Combined pallidal and subthalamic nucleus stimulation in sporadic dystonia-parkinsonism." Journal of Neurosurgery 116, no. 1 (January 2012): 95–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2011.8.jns101552.
Full textAbstract:
Multifocal deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a new technique that has been introduced recently. A 39-year-old man with dystonia-parkinsonism underwent the simultaneous implantation of subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus internus (GPi) DBS electrodes. While bilateral STN DBS controlled the parkinsonian symptoms well and allowed for a reduction in levodopa, the improvement of dystonia was only temporary. Additional GPi DBS also alleviated dystonic symptoms. Formal assessment at the 1-year follow-up showed that both the parkinsonian symptoms and the dystonia were markedly improved via continuous bilateral combined STN and GPi stimulation. Sustained benefit was achieved at 3 years postoperatively.
25
Lin, Suzhen, Yiwen Wu, Hongxia Li, Chencheng Zhang, Tao Wang, Yixin Pan, Lu He, et al. "Deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus internus versus the subthalamic nucleus in isolated dystonia." Journal of Neurosurgery 132, no. 3 (March 2020): 721–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2018.12.jns181927.
Full textAbstract:
OBJECTIVESurgical procedures involving deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) or subthalamic nucleus (STN) are well-established treatments for isolated dystonia. However, selection of the best stimulation target remains a matter of debate. The authors’ objective was to compare the effectiveness of DBS of the GPi and the STN in patients with isolated dystonia.METHODSIn this matched retrospective cohort study, the authors searched an institutional database for data on all patients with isolated dystonia who had undergone bilateral implantation of DBS electrodes in either the GPi or STN in the period from January 30, 2014, to June 30, 2017. Standardized assessments of dystonia and health-related quality of life using the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) and SF-36 were conducted before and at 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery. No patients were lost to the 6-month follow-up; 5 patients were lost to the 12-month follow-up.RESULTSBoth GPi (14 patients) and STN (16 patients) stimulation produced significant improvement in dystonia and quality of life in all 30 patients found in the database search. At the 1-month follow-up, however, the percentage improvement in the BFMDRS total movement score was significantly (p = 0.01) larger after STN DBS (64%) than after GPi DBS (48%). At the 12-month follow-up, the percentage improvement in the axis subscore was significantly (p = 0.03) larger after GPi DBS (93%) than after STN DBS (83%). Also, the total amount of electrical energy delivered was significantly (p = 0.008) lower with STN DBS than with GPi DBS (124 ± 52 vs 192 ± 65 μJ, respectively).CONCLUSIONSThe GPi and STN are both effective targets in alleviating dystonia and improving quality of life. However, GPi stimulation may be better for patients with axial symptoms. Moreover, STN stimulation may produce a larger clinical response within 1 month after surgery and may have a potential economic advantage in terms of lower battery consumption.
26
Kumaravelu, Karthik, Chintan S. Oza, Christina E. Behrend, and Warren M. Grill. "Model-based deconstruction of cortical evoked potentials generated by subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation." Journal of Neurophysiology 120, no. 2 (August 1, 2018): 662–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00862.2017.
Full textAbstract:
Parkinson’s disease is associated with altered neural activity in the motor cortex. Chronic high-frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is effective in suppressing parkinsonian motor symptoms and modulates cortical activity. However, the anatomical pathways responsible for STN DBS-mediated cortical modulation remain unclear. Cortical evoked potentials (cEP) generated by STN DBS reflect the response of cortex to subcortical stimulation, and the goal of this study was to determine the neural origin of STN DBS-generated cEP using a two-step approach. First, we recorded cEP over ipsilateral primary motor cortex during different frequencies of STN DBS in awake healthy and unilateral 6-OHDA-lesioned parkinsonian rats. Second, we used a detailed, biophysically based model of the thalamocortical network to deconstruct the neural origin of the recorded cEP. The in vivo cEP included short (R1)-, intermediate (R2)-, and long-latency (R3) responses. Model-based cortical responses to simulated STN DBS matched remarkably well the in vivo responses. The short-latency response was generated by antidromic activation of layer 5 pyramidal neurons, whereas recurrent activation of layer 5 pyramidal neurons via excitatory axon collaterals reproduced the intermediate-latency response. The long-latency response was generated by polysynaptic activation of layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons via the cortico-thalamic-cortical pathway. Antidromic activation of the hyperdirect pathway and subsequent intracortical and cortico-thalamo-cortical synaptic interactions were sufficient to generate cortical potential evoked by STN DBS, and orthodromic activation through basal ganglia-thalamus-cortex pathways was not required. These results demonstrate the utility of cEP to determine the neural elements activated by STN DBS that might modulate cortical activity and contribute to the suppression of parkinsonian symptoms. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is increasingly used to treat Parkinson’s disease (PD). Cortical potentials evoked by STN DBS in patients with PD exhibit consistent short-latency (1–3 ms), intermediate-latency (5–15 ms), and long-latency (18–25 ms) responses. The short-latency response occurs as a result of antidromic activation of the hyperdirect pathway comprising corticosubthalamic axons. However, the neural origins of intermediate- and long-latency responses remain elusive, and the dominant view is that these are produced through the orthodromic pathway (basal ganglia-thalamus-cortex). By combining in vivo electrophysiology with computational modeling, we demonstrate that antidromic activation of the cortico-thalamic-cortical pathway is sufficient to generate the intermediate- and long-latency cortical responses to STN DBS.
27
Weaver, Frances, Kenneth Follett, Kwan Hur, Dolores Ippolito, and Matthew Stern. "Deep brain stimulation in Parkinson disease: a metaanalysis of patient outcomes." Journal of Neurosurgery 103, no. 6 (December 2005): 956–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/jns.2005.103.6.0956.
Full textAbstract:
Object. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) to treat advanced Parkinson disease (PD) has been focused on one of two anatomical targets: the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and the globus pallidus internus (GPI). Authors of more than 65 articles have reported on bilateral DBS outcomes. With one exception, these studies involved pre- and postintervention comparisons of a single target. Despite the paucity of data directly comparing STN and GPI DBS, many clinicians already consider the STN to be the preferred target site. In this study the authors conducted a metaanalysis of the existing literature on patient outcomes following DBS of the STN and the GPI. Methods. This metaanalysis includes 31 STN and 14 GPI studies. Motor function improved significantly following stimulation (54% in patients whose STN was targeted and 40% in those whose GPI was stimulated), with effect sizes (ESs) of 2.59 and 2.04, respectively. After controlling for participant and study characteristics, patients who had undergone either STN or GPI DBS experienced comparable improved motor function following surgery (p = 0.094). The performance of activities of daily living improved significantly in patients with either target (40%). Medication requirements were significantly reduced following stimulation of the STN (ES = 1.51) but did not change when the GPI was stimulated (ES = −0.02). Conclusions. In this analysis the authors highlight the need for uniform, detailed reporting of comprehensive motor and nonmotor DBS outcomes at multiple time points and for a randomized trial of bilateral STN and GPI DBS.
28
Rektorova, I., Z. Hummelova, and M. Balaz. "Dementia after DBS Surgery: A Case Report and Literature Review." Parkinson's Disease 2011 (2011): 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/679283.
Full textAbstract:
We report the case history of a 75-year-old woman with Parkinson's disease who developed severe cognitive problems after deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the bilateral subthalamic nuclei (STN). After a brief cognitive improvement, the patient gradually deteriorated until she developed full-blown dementia. We discuss the case with respect to the cognitive effects of STN DBS and the possible risk factors of dementia after STN DBS surgery.
29
de Roquemaurel, Alexis, Thomas Wirth, Nirosen Vijiaratnam, Francisca Ferreira, Ludvic Zrinzo, Harith Akram, Thomas Foltynie, and Patricia Limousin. "Stimulation Sweet Spot in Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation – Myth or Reality? A Critical Review of Literature." Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery 99, no. 5 (2021): 425–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000516098.
Full textAbstract:
<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> While deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) has been extensively used for more than 20 years in Parkinson’s disease (PD), the optimal area of stimulation to relieve motor symptoms remains elusive. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> We aimed at localizing the sweet spot within the subthalamic region by performing a systematic review of the literature. <b><i>Method:</i></b> PubMed database was searched for published studies exploring optimal stimulation location for STN DBS in PD, published between 2000 and 2019. A standardized assessment procedure based on methodological features was applied to select high-quality publications. Studies conducted more than 3 months after the DBS procedure, employing lateralized scores and/or stimulation condition, and reporting the volume of tissue activated or the position of the stimulating contact within the subthalamic region were considered in the final analysis. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Out of 439 references, 24 were finally retained, including 21 studies based on contact location and 3 studies based on volume of tissue activated (VTA). Most studies (all VTA-based studies and 13 of the 21 contact-based studies) suggest the superior-lateral STN and the adjacent white matter as the optimal sites for stimulation. Remaining contact-based studies were either inconclusive (5/21), favoured the caudal zona incerta (1/21), or suggested a better outcome of STN stimulation than adjacent white matter stimulation (2/21). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Using a standardized methodological approach, our review supports the presence of a sweet spot located within the supero-lateral STN and extending to the adjacent white matter.
30
Aragão, Veronica Tavares, Sara Carvalho Barbosa Casagrande, Clarice Listik, Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira, Egberto Reis Barbosa, and Rubens Gisbert Cury. "Rescue Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Refractory Meige Syndrome." Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery 99, no. 5 (2021): 451–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000515722.
Full textAbstract:
Meige syndrome is a segmental form of dystonia. It is a disabling disease, especially when refractory to treatment with botulinum toxin. A well-established therapeutic option is deep brain stimulation (DBS), and the target in bilateral globus pallidus internus (GPi DBS) demonstrated satisfactory short- and long-term efficacy. However, some patients present minor or suboptimal responses after GPi DBS, and in those cases, rescue DBS may be appropriate. The present case illustrates a good outcome after subthalamic nucleus (STN) and not after GPi DBS (considering that both were well positioned and had adequate programming). The larger dimension of the GPi and its somatotopic organization, with the stimulation outside the “face region,” could explain our outcomes.
31
Pham, U., I. M. Skogseid, A. H. Pripp, E. Bøen, and M. Toft. "Impulsivity in Parkinson’s disease patients treated with subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation—An exploratory study." PLOS ONE 16, no. 3 (March 12, 2021): e0248568. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248568.
Full textAbstract:
Background Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) is a recognized treatment in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Knowledge is still limited regarding the possible impact of STN-DBS on personality traits and the personality characteristics of PD patients who undergo surgery. Methods To assess personality traits in relation to STN-DBS we did an ancillary protocol as part of a prospective randomized study that compared two surgical strategies. Patients were assessed with the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI), the Urgency, Premeditation, Perseverance and Sensation Seeking impulse behavior scale, the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ) and the Toronto Alexithymia Scale preoperatively and after one year of STN-DBS. EPQ and TCI baseline scores were compared with mean scores of healthy reference populations. Results After 12-months of STN-DBS, there was a significant decline in Persistence compared to baseline. Preoperatively, the STN-DBS patients had significantly lower Persistence and Self-Transcendence scores, and significantly higher scores on Novelty-Seeking, Self-Directedness, Cooperativeness and on Social Conformity than referenced populations. No difference was found in Neuroticism or Harm-Avoidance scores. The baseline prevalence of alexithymia was low and at 1-year follow-up there was no significant change in alexithymia scores. Conclusions We found a higher baseline level of impulsivity in PD patients who underwent STN-DBS. After one year of STN-DBS, our results indicated that the treatment may affect the patients’ personality by increasing certain aspects of impulsivity. There was no effect on alexithymia. The preoperative personality profile of PD patients might influence the outcome of STN-DBS.
32
Park, Hye Ran, Yong Hoon Lim, Eun Jin Song, Jae Meen Lee, Kawngwoo Park, Kwang Hyon Park, Woong-Woo Lee, Han-Joon Kim, Beomseok Jeon, and Sun Ha Paek. "Bilateral Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation under General Anesthesia: Literature Review and Single Center Experience." Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, no. 9 (September 21, 2020): 3044. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9093044.
Full textAbstract:
Bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established treatment in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Traditionally, STN DBS for PD is performed by using microelectrode recording (MER) and/or intraoperative macrostimulation under local anesthesia (LA). However, many patients cannot tolerate the long operation time under LA without medication. In addition, it cannot be even be performed on PD patients with poor physical and neurological condition. Recently, it has been reported that STN DBS under general anesthesia (GA) can be successfully performed due to the feasible MER under GA, as well as the technical advancement in direct targeting and intraoperative imaging. The authors reviewed the previously published literature on STN DBS under GA using intraoperative imaging and MER, focused on discussing the technique, clinical outcome, and the complication, as well as introducing our single-center experience. Based on the reports of previously published studies and ours, GA did not interfere with the MER signal from STN. STN DBS under GA without intraoperative stimulation shows similar or better clinical outcome without any additional complication compared to STN DBS under LA. Long-term follow-up with a large number of the patients would be necessary to validate the safety and efficacy of STN DBS under GA.
33
Carlson, Jonathan D., Daniel R. Cleary, Justin S. Cetas, Mary M. Heinricher, and Kim J. Burchiel. "Deep Brain Stimulation Does Not Silence Neurons in Subthalamic Nucleus in Parkinson's Patients." Journal of Neurophysiology 103, no. 2 (February 2010): 962–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00363.2009.
Full textAbstract:
Two broad hypotheses have been advanced to explain the clinical efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for treatment of Parkinson's disease. One is that stimulation inactivates STN neurons, producing a functional lesion. The other is that electrical stimulation activates the STN output, thus “jamming” pathological activity in basal ganglia-corticothalamic circuits. Evidence consistent with both concepts has been adduced from modeling and animal studies, as well as from recordings in patients. However, the stimulation parameters used in many recording studies have not been well matched to those used clinically. In this study, we recorded STN activity in patients with Parkinson's disease during stimulation delivered through a clinical DBS electrode using standard therapeutic stimulus parameters. A microelectrode was used to record the firing of a single STN neuron during DBS (3–5 V, 80–200 Hz, 90- to 200-μs pulses; 33 neurons/11 patients). Firing rate was unchanged during the stimulus trains, and the recorded neurons did not show prolonged (s) changes in firing rate on termination of the stimulation. However, a brief (∼1 ms), short-latency (6 ms) postpulse inhibition was seen in 10 of 14 neurons analyzed. A subset of neurons displayed altered firing patterns, with a predominant shift toward random firing. These data do not support the idea that DBS inactivates the STN and are instead more consistent with the hypothesis that this stimulation provides a null signal to basal ganglia-corticothalamic circuitry that has been altered as part of Parkinson's disease.
34
Toda, Hiroki, Clement Hamani, and Andres Lozano. "Deep brain stimulation in the treatment of dyskinesia and dystonia." Neurosurgical Focus 17, no. 1 (July 2004): 9–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/foc.2004.17.1.2.
Full textAbstract:
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become a mainstay of treatment for patients with movement disorders. This modality is directed at modulating pathological activity within basal ganglia output structures by stimulating some of their nuclei, such as the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and the globus pallidus internus (GPi), without making permanent lesions. With the accumulation of experience, indications for the use of DBS have become clearer and the effectiveness and limitations of this form of therapy in different clinical conditions have been better appreciated. In this review the authors discuss the efficacy of DBS in the treatment of dystonia and levodopa-induced dyskinesias. The use of DBS of the STN and GPi is very effective for the treatment of movement disorders induced by levodopa. The relative benefits of using the GPi as opposed to the STN as a target are still being investigated. Bilateral GPi stimulation is gaining importance in the therapeutic armamentarium for the treatment of dystonia. The DYT1 forms of generalized dystonia and cervical dystonias respond to DBS better than secondary dystonia does. Discrimination between the diverse forms of dystonia and a better understanding of the pathophysiological features of this condition will serve as a platform for improved outcomes.
35
Slowinski, Jerzy L., John D. Putzke, Ryan J. Uitti, John A. Lucas, Margaret F. Turk, Bruce A. Kall, and Robert E. Wharen. "Unilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus for Parkinson disease." Journal of Neurosurgery 106, no. 4 (April 2007): 626–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/jns.2007.106.4.626.
Full textAbstract:
Object The object of this study was to assess the results of unilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for management of advanced Parkinson disease (PD). Methods A clinical series of 24 patients (mean age 71 years, range 56–80 years) with medically intractable PD, who were undergoing unilateral magnetic resonance imaging–targeted, electrophysiologically guided STN DBS, completed a battery of qualitative and quantitative outcome measures preoperatively (baseline) and postoperatively, using a modified Core Assessment Program for Intracerebral Transplantations protocol. The mean follow-up period was 9 months. Statistically significant improvement was observed in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part II score (18%), the total UPDRS PART III score (31%), the contralateral UPDRS Part III score (63%), and scores for axial motor features (19%), contralateral tremor (88%), rigidity (60%), bradykinesia (54%), and dyskinesia (69%), as well as the Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life questionnaire score (15%) in the on-stimulation state compared with baseline. Ipsilateral symptoms improved by approximately 15% or less. Performance on the Purdue pegboard test improved in the contralateral hand in the on-stimulation state compared with the off-stimulation state (38%, p < 0.05). The daily levodopa-equivalent dose was reduced by 21% (p = 0.018). Neuropsychological tests revealed an improvement in mental flexibility and a trend toward reduced letter fluency. There were no permanent surgical complications. Of the 16 participants with symmetrical disease, five required implantation of the DBS unit on the second side. Conclusions Unilateral STN DBS is an effective and safe treatment for selected patients with advanced PD. Unilateral STN DBS provides improvement of contralateral motor symptoms of PD as well as quality of life, reduces requirements for medication, and possibly enhances mental flexibility. This method of surgical treatment may be associated with a reduced risk and may provide an alternative to bilateral STN DBS for PD, especially in older patients or patients with asymmetry of parkinsonism.
36
Yang, Chunhui, Yiqing Qiu, Xi Wu, Jiali Wang, Yina Wu, and Xiaowu Hu. "Analysis of Contact Position for Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation-Induced Hyperhidrosis." Parkinson's Disease 2019 (March 6, 2019): 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/8180123.
Full textAbstract:
Objectives. To analyze the hyperhidrosis neural network structure induced by subthalamic nucleus (STN) - deep brain stimulation (DBS). Materials and Methods. Patients with Parkinson’s disease treated with STN-DBS in Changhai Hospital between July 1, 2015, and December 1, 2016, were analyzed retrospectively. Using records of side effects of the intraoperative macrostimulation test, patients with skin sweats were selected as the sweating group. Based on the number of cases in the sweating group, the same number of patients was randomly selected from other STN-DBS patients without sweating to form the control group. The study standardized electrode position with Lead-DBS software to Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) standard stereotactic space to compare the differences in three-dimensional coordinates of activated contacts between groups. Results. Of 355 patients, 11 patients had sweats during intraoperative macrostimulation tests. There was no significant difference in the preoperative baseline information and the postoperative UPDRS-III improvement rate (Med-off, IPG-on) between groups. Contacts inducing sweat were more medial (X-axis) (11.02 ± 0.69 mm vs 11.98 ± 0.84 mm, P=0.00057) and more upward (Z-axis) (−7.15 ± 1.06 mm VS −7.98 ± 1.21 mm, P=0.032) than those of the control group. The straight-line distance between the center of the sweat contact and the nearest voxel of the red nucleus was closer than that of the control group (2.72 ± 0.65 mm VS 3.76 ± 0.85 mm, P=0.00012). Conclusions. STN-DBS-induced sweat indicated that the contact was at superior medial of STN.
37
Kashyap, Samir, Rita Ceponiene, Paras Savla, Jacob Bernstein, Hammad Ghanchi, and Ajay Ananda. "Resolution of tardive tremor after bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation placement." Surgical Neurology International 11 (December 16, 2020): 444. http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/sni_723_2020.
Full textAbstract:
Background: Tardive tremor (TT) is an underrecognized manifestation of tardive syndrome (TS). In our experience, TT is a rather common manifestation of TS, especially in a setting of treatment with aripiprazole, and is a frequent cause of referrals for the evaluation of idiopathic Parkinson disease. There are reports of successful treatment of tardive orofacial dyskinesia and dystonia with deep brain stimulation (DBS) using globus pallidus interna (GPi) as the primary target, but the literature on subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS for tardive dyskinesia (TD) is lacking. To the best of our knowledge, there are no reports on DBS treatment of TT. Case Description: A 75-year-old right-handed female with the medical history of generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder had been treated with thioridazine and citalopram from 1980 till 2010. Around 2008, she developed orolingual dyskinesia. She was started on tetrabenazine in June 2011. She continued to have tremors and developed Parkinsonian gait, both of which worsened overtime. She underwent DBS placement in the left STN in January 2017 with near-complete resolution of her tremors. She underwent right STN implantation in September 2017 with similar improvement in symptoms. Conclusion: While DBS-GPi is the preferred treatment in treating oral TD and dystonia, DBS-STN could be considered a safe and effective target in patients with predominating TT and/or tardive Parkinsonism. This patient saw a marked improvement in her symptoms after implantation of DBS electrodes, without significant relapse or recurrence in the years following implantation.
38
Barboza e Barbosa, Eduarda Naidel, and Helenice Charchat Fichman. "How is cognition in subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation Parkinson’s disease patients?" Dementia & Neuropsychologia 13, no. 4 (December 2019): 367–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-57642018dn13-040002.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract The impairments in cognitive functions such as memory, executive function, visuospatial skills and language in Parkinson’s disease (PD) are drawing increasing attention in the current literature. Studies dedicated to investigating the relationship between subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) and cognitive functioning are contradictory. This systematic review aims to analyze the impact on the cognitive functioning of patients with PD and STN-DBS. Articles published in the 2007-2017 period were retrieved from the Medline/Pubmed databases using PRISMA criteria. The analysis of 27 articles revealed many conflicting results, precluding a consensus on a cognitive functioning standard and hampering the establishment of a neuropsychological profile for PD patients who underwent STN-DBS surgery. Further studies investigating this relationship are needed.
39
Hu, Tianqi, Hutao Xie, Yu Diao, Houyou Fan, Delong Wu, Yifei Gan, Fangang Meng, Yutong Bai, and Jianguo Zhang. "Effects of Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation on Depression in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease." Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 19 (October 1, 2022): 5844. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195844.
Full textAbstract:
Objective: In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of STN-DBS on PD patients with different levels of depression and to identify predictors of the effects of STN-DBS on PD depression. Methods: We retrospectively collected data for 118 patients with PD depression who underwent STN-DBS at Beijing Tiantan Hospital. Neuropsychological, motor, and quality of life assessments were applied preoperatively and postoperatively. All patients were divided into two groups according to their HAM-D24 total scores (group I: mild depression; group Ⅱ: moderate depression). A mixed repeated-measure analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to investigate whether there were differences in depression scores before and after STN-DBS between the two groups. The changes in depression scores were also compared between groups using ANCOVA, adjusting for gender and preoperative HAMA scores. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of STN-DBS’s effects on PD depression. Results: Both groups showed significant improvement in depression symptoms after STN-DBS. Compared with patients in group I, patients in group Ⅱ showed greater reductions in their HAM-D24 total scores (p = 0.002) and in HAM-D24 subitems including cognitive disturbances (p = 0.026) and hopelessness symptoms (p = 0.018). Logistic regression indicated that gender (female) (p = 0.014) and preoperative moderate depression (p < 0.001) patients had greater improvements in depression after STN-DBS. Conclusions: Patients with moderate depression showed better improvement than patients with mild depression. Gender (female) and preoperative HAMA scores are predictors of STN-DBS’s effects on PD depression.
40
Sun, David A., Hong Yu, John Spooner, Armanda D. Tatsas, Thomas Davis, Ty W. Abel, Chris Kao, and Peter E. Konrad. "Postmortem analysis following 71 months of deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus for Parkinson disease." Journal of Neurosurgery 109, no. 2 (August 2008): 325–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/jns/2008/109/8/0325.
Full textAbstract:
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is a clinically effective neurosurgical treatment for Parkinson disease. Tissue reaction to chronic DBS therapy and the definitive location of active stimulation contacts are best studied on a postmortem basis in patients who have undergone DBS. The authors report the postmortem analysis of STN DBS following 5 years and 11 months of effective chronic stimulation including the histologically verified location of the active contacts associated with bilateral implants. They also describe tissue response to intraoperative test passes with recording microelectrodes and stimulating semimacroelectrodes. The results indicated that 1) the neural tissue surrounding active and nonactive contacts responds similarly, with a thin glial capsule and foreign-body giant cell reaction surrounding the leads as well as piloid gliosis, hemosiderin-laden macrophages, scattered lymphocytes, and Rosenthal fibers; 2) there was evidence of separate tracts in the adjacent tissue for intraoperative microelectrode and semimacroelectrode passes together with reactive gliosis, microcystic degeneration, and scattered hemosiderin deposition; and 3) the active contacts used for ~ 6 years of effective bilateral DBS therapy lie in the zona incerta, just dorsal to the rostral STN. To the authors' knowledge, the period of STN DBS therapy herein described for Parkinson disease and subjected to postmortem analysis is the longest to date.
41
Martel Sauvageau, Vincent, Joël Macoir, Mélanie Langlois, Michel Prud’Homme, Léo Cantin, and Johanna-Pascale Roy. "Changes in Vowel Articulation with Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Dysarthric Speakers with Parkinson’s Disease." Parkinson's Disease 2014 (2014): 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/487035.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose. To investigate changes in vowel articulation with the electrical deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in dysarthric speakers with Parkinson’s disease (PD).Methods. Eight Quebec-French speakers diagnosed with idiopathic PD who had undergone STN DBS were evaluated ON-stimulation and OFF-stimulation (1 hour after DBS was turned off). Vowel articulation was compared ON-simulation versus OFF-stimulation using acoustic vowel space and formant centralization ratio, calculated with the first (F1) and second formant (F2) of the vowels /i/, /u/, and /a/. The impact of the preceding consonant context on articulation, which represents a measure of coarticulation, was also analyzed as a function of the stimulation state.Results. Maximum vowel articulation increased during ON-stimulation. Analyses also indicate that vowel articulation was modulated by the consonant context but this relationship did not change with STN DBS.Conclusions. Results suggest that STN DBS may improve articulation in dysarthric speakers with PD, in terms of range of movement. Optimization of the electrical parameters for each patient is important and may lead to improvement in speech fine motor control. However, the impact on overall speech intelligibility may still be small. Clinical considerations are discussed and new research avenues are suggested.Corrigendum to “Changes in Vowel Articulation with Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Dysarthric Speakers with Parkinson’s Disease”
42
Guimarães, Thiago Gonçalves, and Rubens Gisbert Cury. "Troubleshooting Gait Problems in Parkinson’s Disease Patients with Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation." Journal of Parkinson's Disease 12, no. 2 (February 15, 2022): 737–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/jpd-212771.
Full textAbstract:
Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) is an established therapy for a subset of patients with Parkinson’s disease, and the adjustment of DBS parameters is typically guided by the patients’ rigidity and tremor. Although these cardinal symptoms remain relatively stable over time, progressive worsening of axial symptoms compromise motor function and quality of life. Because many patients report improvements in their global mobility after gait improvement, we have been adjusting DBS parameters during the long-term after surgery based on gait analysis. Here, we describe a practical strategy for troubleshooting gait problems in PD DBS patients by revising stimulation parameters through “hands-on” programming, which can be a useful alternative approach for improving patients’ outcomes after STN DBS.
43
Iannone, Aline, Nasser Allam, and Joaquim P. Brasil-Neto. "Safety of transcranial direct current stimulation in a patient with deep brain stimulation electrodes." Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria 77, no. 3 (March 2019): 174–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0004-282x20190019.
Full textAbstract:
ABSTRACT Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been investigated in movement disorders, making it a therapeutic alternative in clinical settings. However, there is still no consensus on the most appropriate treatment protocols in most cases, and the presence of deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes has been regarded as a contraindication to the procedure. We recently studied the effects of cerebellar tDCS on a female patient already undergoing subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) for generalized dystonia. She also presented with chronic pain and depression. With STN-DBS, there was improvement of dystonia, and botulinum toxin significantly reduced pain. However, depressive symptoms were worse after STN-DBS surgery. Methods: Neuromodulation with 2 mA anodal cerebellar tDCS was initiated, targeting both hemispheres in each daily 30 minute session: 15 minutes of left cerebellar stimulation followed by 15 minutes of right cerebellar stimulation. The DBS electrodes were in place and functional, but the current was turned off during tDCS. Results: Although our goal was to improve dystonic movements, after 10 tDCS sessions there was also improvement in mood with normalization of Beck Depression Inventory scores. There were no complications in spite of the implanted STN-DBS leads. Conclusion: Our results indicate that tDCS is safe in patients with DBS electrodes and may be an effective add-on neuromodulatory tool in the treatment of potential DBS partial efficacy in patients with movement disorders.
44
Romann, Aline Juliane, Bárbara Costa Beber, Maira Rozenfeld Olchik, and Carlos R. M. Rieder. "Different outcomes of phonemic verbal fluency in Parkinson’s disease patients with subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation." Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria 75, no. 4 (April 2017): 216–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0004-282x20170024.
Full textAbstract:
ABSTRACT Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is a surgical technique to treat motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Studies have shown that STN-DBS may cause a decline in verbal fluency performance. We aimed to verify the effects of STN-DBS on the performance of phonemic verbal fluency in Brazilian PD patients. Sixteen participants were evaluated on the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale - Part III and for phonemic fluency (“FAS” version) in the conditions of on- and off-stimulation. We identified two different patterns of phonemic verbal fluency outcomes. The results indicate that there may be no expected pattern of effect of bilateral STN-DBS in the phonemic fluency, and patients may present with different outcomes for some reason not well understood.
45
Nickl, Robert C., Martin M. Reich, Nicoló Gabriele Pozzi, Patrick Fricke, Florian Lange, Jonas Roothans, Jens Volkmann, and Cordula Matthies. "Rescuing Suboptimal Outcomes of Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson Disease by Surgical Lead Revision." Neurosurgery 85, no. 2 (March 6, 2019): E314—E321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyz018.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract BACKGROUND Clinical trials have established subthalamic deep-brain-stimulation (STN-DBS) as a highly effective treatment for motor symptoms of Parkinson disease (PD), but in clinical practice outcomes are variable. Experienced centers are confronted with an increasing number of patients with partially “failed” STN-DBS, in whom motor benefit doesn’t meet expectations. These patients require a complex multidisciplinary and standardized workup to identify the likely cause. OBJECTIVE To describe outcomes in a series of PD patients undergoing lead revision for suboptimal motor benefit after STN-DBS surgery and characterize selection criteria for surgical revision. METHODS We investigated 9 PD patients with STN-DBS, who had unsatisfactory outcomes despite intensive neurological management. Surgical revision was considered if the ratio of DBS vs levodopa-induced improvement of UPDRS-III (DBS-rr) was below 75% and the electrodes were found outside the dorsolateral STN. RESULTS Fifteen electrodes were replaced via stereotactic revision surgery into the dorsolateral STN without any adverse effects. Median displacement distance was 4.1 mm (range 1.6-8.42 mm). Motor symptoms significantly improved (38.2 ± 6.6 to 15.5 ± 7.9 points, P < .001); DBS-rr increased from 64% to 190%. CONCLUSION Patients with persistent OFFmotor symptoms after STN-DBS should be screened for levodopa-responsiveness, which can serve as a benchmark for best achievable motor benefit. Even small horizontal deviations of the lead from the optimal position within the dorsolateral STN can cause stimulation responses, which are markedly inferior to the levodopa response. Patients with an image confirmed lead displacement and preserved levodopa response are candidates for lead revision and can expect significant motor improvement from appropriate lead replacement.
46
Knowles, Thea, Scott Adams, Anita Abeyesekera, Cynthia Mancinelli, Greydon Gilmore, and Mandar Jog. "Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus Parameter Optimization for Vowel Acoustics and Speech Intelligibility in Parkinson's Disease." Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 61, no. 3 (March 15, 2018): 510–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2017_jslhr-s-17-0157.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose The settings of 3 electrical stimulation parameters were adjusted in 12 speakers with Parkinson's disease (PD) with deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) to examine their effects on vowel acoustics and speech intelligibility. Method Participants were tested under permutations of low, mid, and high STN-DBS frequency, voltage, and pulse width settings. At each session, participants recited a sentence. Acoustic characteristics of vowel production were extracted, and naive listeners provided estimates of speech intelligibility. Results Overall, lower-frequency STN-DBS stimulation (60 Hz) was found to lead to improvements in intelligibility and acoustic vowel expansion. An interaction between speaker sex and STN-DBS stimulation was found for vowel measures. The combination of low frequency, mid to high voltage, and low to mid pulse width led to optimal speech outcomes; however, these settings did not demonstrate significant speech outcome differences compared with the standard clinical STN-DBS settings, likely due to substantial individual variability. Conclusions Although lower-frequency STN-DBS stimulation was found to yield consistent improvements in speech outcomes, it was not found to necessarily lead to the best speech outcomes for all participants. Nevertheless, frequency may serve as a starting point to explore settings that will optimize an individual's speech outcomes following STN-DBS surgery. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.5899228
47
Meagher, Linton J., Ralf Ilchef, Paul Silberstein, Raymond J. Cook, Daniel Wasson, and Gin S. Malhi. "Psychiatric morbidity in patients with Parkinson’s disease following bilateral subthalamic deep brain stimulation: literature review." Acta Neuropsychiatrica 20, no. 4 (August 2008): 182–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5215.2008.00287.x.
Full textAbstract:
Objective:To provide a comprehensive review and evaluation of the literature pertaining to the psychiatric sequelae of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD).Methods:A structured search of the EMBASE, PsychINFO and MEDLINE databases was performed on articles published since the first use of STN DBS in 1993 for PD until March 2007. Non-human studies were excluded, along with studies reporting on unilateral DBS and studies reporting on the use of STN DBS for indications other than idiopathic PD. Ninety-seven articles were selected for inclusion in the review.Results:Patients with advanced PD have a high rate of psychiatric morbidity. STN DBS has been shown to be an effective treatment for the control of motor symptoms in advanced PD. Neurobehavioural side-effects are, however, relatively common following STN DBS. Side-effects include impaired executive function and verbal fluency, depression, hypomania, apathy, postoperative delirium, anxiety disorders and psychotic symptoms, especially hallucinations. The alteration in dopaminergic medication following surgery as well as the direct effect of STN stimulation both appear to contribute to the short-term and long-term postoperative psychiatric complications. Methodological issues that limit the applicability of the current literature in this field are highlighted.Conclusions:STN DBS is an effective treatment for the motor symptoms of advanced PD. However, further research is needed to assess the extent to which STN DBS contributes to or exacerbates psychiatric morbidity over and above that associated with advanced PD. Careful neuropsychiatric evaluation and monitoring are required in this patient group.
48
Umemura, Atsushi, Yuichi Oka, Kenji Okita, Noriyuki Matsukawa, and Kazuo Yamada. "Subthalamic nucleus stimulation for Parkinson disease with severe medication-induced hallucinations or delusions." Journal of Neurosurgery 114, no. 6 (June 2011): 1701–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2011.2.jns101261.
Full textAbstract:
Object Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) improves cardinal motor symptoms of Parkinson disease (PD) and reduces antiparkinsonian medication. Therefore, STN DBS seems to be well indicated for patients suffering from medication-induced psychotic symptoms. However, there are few available data dealing with the effect of STN DBS in this kind of patient. The authors studied the effect of STN DBS in patients with PD and severe medication-induced hallucinations or delusions. Methods The authors retrospectively reviewed the clinical course of 10 patients who suffered from severe medication-induced hallucinations or delusions and underwent bilateral STN DBS. Patients whose preoperative thought disorder score (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part I, item 2) was 3 or more were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent cognitive function examination and brain perfusion SPECT preoperatively to exclude dementia with Lewy bodies. Results Subthalamic nucleus DBS yielded significant improvement of motor function in all patients. In 8 patients, psychotic symptoms completely disappeared with significant reduction of dopaminergic medication. In 2 patients, hallucinations and delusions deteriorated immediately after surgery despite complete withdrawal of antiparkinsonian medication. However, these psychotic symptoms completely disappeared after a few months with administration of antipsychotics, and no recurrence was observed afterward in either patient. Conclusions Subthalamic nucleus DBS is a good treatment option for patients with PD who are suffering severe medication-induced hallucinations or delusion. However, vigilance is needed, because temporary deterioration of psychotic symptoms may occur after surgery.
49
Di Rauso, Giulia, Francesco Cavallieri, Isabella Campanini, Annalisa Gessani, Valentina Fioravanti, Alberto Feletti, Benedetta Damiano, et al. "Freezing of Gait in Parkinson’s Disease Patients Treated with Bilateral Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation: A Long-Term Overview." Biomedicines 10, no. 9 (September 7, 2022): 2214. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10092214.
Full textAbstract:
Bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is an effective treatment in advanced Parkinson’s Disease (PD). However, the effects of STN-DBS on freezing of gait (FOG) are still debated, particularly in the long-term follow-up (≥5-years). The main aim of the current study is to evaluate the long-term effects of STN-DBS on FOG. Twenty STN-DBS treated PD patients were included. Each patient was assessed before surgery through a detailed neurological evaluation, including FOG score, and revaluated in the long-term (median follow-up: 5-years) in different stimulation and drug conditions. In the long term follow-up, FOG score significantly worsened in the off-stimulation/off-medication condition compared with the pre-operative off-medication assessment (z = −1.930; p = 0.05) but not in the on-stimulation/off-medication (z = −0.357; p = 0.721). There was also a significant improvement of FOG at long-term assessment by comparing on-stimulation/off-medication and off-stimulation/off-medication conditions (z = −2.944; p = 0.003). These results highlight the possible beneficial long-term effects of STN-DBS on FOG.
50
Romann, Aline Juliane, Bárbara Costa Beber, Carla Aparecida Cielo, and Carlos Roberto de Mello Rieder. "Acoustic Voice Modifications in Individuals with Parkinson Disease Submitted to Deep Brain Stimulation." International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology 23, no. 02 (March 1, 2019): 203–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1675392.
Full textAbstract:
Introduction Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) improves motor function in individuals with Parkinson disease (PD). The evidence about the effects of STN-DBS on the voice is still inconclusive. Objective To verify the effect of STN-DBS on the voice of Brazilian individuals with PD. Methods Sixteen participants were evaluated on the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale—Part III, and by the measurement of the acoustic modifications in on and off conditions of stimulation. Results The motor symptoms showed significant improvement with STN-DBS on. Regarding the acoustic measures of the voice, only the maximum fundamental frequency (fhi) showed a statistical difference between on- and off-conditions, with reduction in off-condition. Conclusion Changes in computerized acoustic measures are more valuable when interpreted in conjunction with changes in other measures. The single finding in fhi suggests that DBS-STN increases vocal instability. The interpretation of this result should be done carefully, since it may not be of great value if other measures that also indicate instability are not significantly different.