Relevant bibliographies by topics / Strategic environmental assessment

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters
  5. Conference papers
  6. Reports

Academic literature on the topic 'Strategic environmental assessment'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 10 March 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Strategic environmental assessment.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Strategic environmental assessment"

1

Jordan, Andrew. "Strategic environmental assessment." Applied Geography 13, no. 3 (July 1993): 285–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0143-6228(93)90006-m.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Owens, Susan. "Strategic environmental assessment." Global Environmental Change 5, no. 1 (March 1995): 78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0959-3780(95)90013-6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Marsden, Simon. "Reforming Strategic Environmental Assessment." Alternative Law Journal 38, no. 3 (September 2013): 181–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1037969x1303800310.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

NOOTEBOOM, SIBOUT, and KEIMPE WIERINGA. "COMPARING STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT." Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 01, no. 04 (December 1999): 441–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s146433329900034x.

Full text
Abstract:
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) aims to assess the environmental effects of proposed policies, plans and programmes (PPPs), governing sectoral activities such as transport, agriculture, industry and tourism. Integrated Environmental Assessment (IEA) aims to assess the environmental effects of societal activities and government policy, not in respect to a particular proposed PPP, but in general. The thesis of this paper is that, in particular at the national and international level, SEA and IEA are instruments with complementary roles in the policy making process. A truly pro-active approach requires application of IEA next to SEA. They can also strengthen one another by making use of the same assessment tools. The paper makes use of the experiences of European practitioners of SEA and IEA. It makes no explicit reference to the general theory of planning and policy making, but the experiences and ideas are considered to be of use to practioners as well as policy makers and academics. The paper first describes the context of SEA and IEA — mainly in Europe — and then compares them on key characteristics. This leads to a discussion of the relationship between the two, possibilities for improvement and conclusions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

NOBLE, BRAM F. "STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: WHAT IS IT? & WHAT MAKES IT STRATEGIC?" Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 02, no. 02 (June 2000): 203–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s146433320000014x.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper highlights perhaps one of the most fundamental issues constraining strategic environmental assessment (SEA) practice — its definition. Current reviews fail to explain why certain assessments are referred to as strategic while others are not. Furthermore, there appears to be very little attention given to the basic characteristics of strategy in the environmental assessment of proposed or existing policies, plans and programmes. This paper attempts to identify the characteristics of SEA that make it strategic and therefore different from other forms of impact assessment. A review of selected case studies is undertaken with the purpose of identifying those assessments that actually conform to the characteristics of a "strategic assessment". It is argued here that if SEA methodology and practice is to advance, then a common understanding of its definition and characteristics must first be achieved.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

HARASHINA, Sachihiko. "What is Strategic Environmental Assessment." Japanese Journal of Real Estate Sciences 13, no. 3 (1999): 54–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.5736/jares1985.13.3_54.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Morimoto, Yukihiro. "Mitigation in strategic environmental assessment." Landscape Ecology and Management 9, no. 1 (2004): 4–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.5738/jale.9.4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Nwanekezie, Kelechi, Bram Noble, and Greg Poelzer. "Transitions-based strategic environmental assessment." Environmental Impact Assessment Review 91 (November 2021): 106643. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106643.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Thérivel, Riki, Pietro Caratti, Maria do Rosário Partidärio, Ásdís Hlökk Theodórsdóttir, and David Tyldesley. "Writing strategic environmental assessment guidance." Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 22, no. 4 (December 2004): 259–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/147154604781765824.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

McKay, Stephen. "Handbook of Strategic Environmental Assessment." Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 13, no. 4 (December 2011): 443–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2011.625783.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Strategic environmental assessment"

1

Cécile, Hervé-Bazin, Klinkenberg Nils, and Milam Matt. "Strategically Sustainable Environmental Assessment." Thesis, Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, Avdelningen för maskinteknik, 2009. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:bth-3927.

Full text
Abstract:
Large-scale planning initiatives can present major long-term environmental and social consequences. Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) is one type of approach to integrating environmental considerations into many large-scale plans and programs, and was established in the European Union by Council Directive 2001/42/EC. Practical and theoretical limitations remain, and this research considers “How can SEA be carried out for plans and programs to better support strategic decision-making toward sustainability?” Information is compiled from an extensive literature review, interviews with SEA experts, and a case study SEA. An analysis is conducted around a framework for strategic sustainable development, based on backcasting from sustainability principles. Results indicate that SEA plays an important role in mitigating environmental impacts of planning, but also faces many weaknesses relative to a truly strategic approach to sustainable development. To help fill these gaps, generic recommendations are developed for SEA practice. Built on a principle-based definition of sustainability, they are relevant to any individual SEA situation. Hypothetical applications of the recommendations are illustrated with a case study. By adopting these recommendations, SEA practitioners can enable planners to better integrate strategic sustainable development into the decisions and upstream design of plans and programs.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Lien, Jung-Hsun, and N/A. "Integrating Strategic Environmental Assessment into Transport Planning." Griffith University. Griffith School of Environment, 2007. http://www4.gu.edu.au:8080/adt-root/public/adt-QGU20070813.155624.

Full text
Abstract:
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) has become recognised as an improvement on the existing, limited system of project-based EIA. It aims to integrate environmental considerations into government policies, plans and programmes, and provides a basis for arriving at better-informed decisions at broader strategic levels. However, the compatibility of this new environmental planning tool with other planning systems such as transport, holds the key to successful integration of environmental concerns into existing planning approaches. This study investigates whether SEA can influence and integrate with transport planning and policy development processes through a survey of attitudes and opinions of planners on transport SEA in Taiwan. Transport planning has been criticised for considering too few alternatives, and for basing evaluations solely on technical and economic grounds. The emerging SEA seems theoretically feasible and potentially beneficial in allowing the integration of environmental concerns into strategic transport planning. Though many countries or regions have transport SEA provisions, practical transport SEA applications remain limited, mostly in Western developed countries with high environmental awareness. SEA applications are also limited in their strategies, focusing mainly on infrastructure-related projects. Moreover, most current transport SEA practices lack strategic focus and thus fail to fulfill SEA principles. This suggests that many planners are unfamiliar with the nature and techniques of SEA, and the conceptual impediments are still critical, which may result in significant barriers to transport SEA application. The EIA Act promulgated in 1994, together with its relevant provisions, have provided an applicable mechanism and a legal basis for SEA application in Taiwan, however, no transport SEA cases have been conducted. Many technical and non-technical barriers have been identified by the interviewees, indicating that most of the planners in Taiwan believe that transport SEA is conceptually and practically immature, and planners are not yet ready for it. The conceptual barriers seem more critical at this stage because practical barriers can only be identified and overcome when planners and decision-makers have a clear and proper concept of SEA. This narrowly-viewed application has limited the benefits of SEA, and has resulted in a rigid and incorrect idea that SEA was a passive impact-reducing mechanism; this may mislead the attitudes of planners to transport SEA. In fact, the emerging SEA is a re-engineered planning system framework that serves to remind planners that they are able to improve their efforts. It is a paradigm revolution, as the way in which planners think can make a vast difference. Thus, the potential for the emerging SEA concept to influence and integrate with transport planning and transport policy development processes depends not only on practical feasibility but also on a fundamental conceptual recognition of transport SEA. SEA could influence and integrate with transport planning and transport policy development processes if planners and decision-makers changed their ways of thinking. This study also found that a tiered and integrated transport SEA, embedded in the main transport planning process at different strategic levels, has great potential to embody the environmental and sustainable concerns in transport planning and decision-making. This finding is based on several contentions supported by the recent SEA studies showing that it should not be detached from the main planning process. SEA needs to be flexible in order to meet various policies, plans and programmes (PPP) demands, and it must be value-driven, not impact-oriented. A tiered, integrated transport SEA provides ways to overcome identified transport SEA application impediments. This two-in-one planning system is a simple solution which allows transport SEA to be conducted without involving complex legal processes. It improves institutional coordination and integrates not only with planning processes but also with values and resources.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Lien, Jung-Hsun. "Integrating Strategic Environmental Assessment into Transport Planning." Thesis, Griffith University, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/10072/367636.

Full text
Abstract:
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) has become recognised as an improvement on the existing, limited system of project-based EIA. It aims to integrate environmental considerations into government policies, plans and programmes, and provides a basis for arriving at better-informed decisions at broader strategic levels. However, the compatibility of this new environmental planning tool with other planning systems such as transport, holds the key to successful integration of environmental concerns into existing planning approaches. This study investigates whether SEA can influence and integrate with transport planning and policy development processes through a survey of attitudes and opinions of planners on transport SEA in Taiwan. Transport planning has been criticised for considering too few alternatives, and for basing evaluations solely on technical and economic grounds. The emerging SEA seems theoretically feasible and potentially beneficial in allowing the integration of environmental concerns into strategic transport planning. Though many countries or regions have transport SEA provisions, practical transport SEA applications remain limited, mostly in Western developed countries with high environmental awareness. SEA applications are also limited in their strategies, focusing mainly on infrastructure-related projects. Moreover, most current transport SEA practices lack strategic focus and thus fail to fulfill SEA principles. This suggests that many planners are unfamiliar with the nature and techniques of SEA, and the conceptual impediments are still critical, which may result in significant barriers to transport SEA application. The EIA Act promulgated in 1994, together with its relevant provisions, have provided an applicable mechanism and a legal basis for SEA application in Taiwan, however, no transport SEA cases have been conducted. Many technical and non-technical barriers have been identified by the interviewees, indicating that most of the planners in Taiwan believe that transport SEA is conceptually and practically immature, and planners are not yet ready for it. The conceptual barriers seem more critical at this stage because practical barriers can only be identified and overcome when planners and decision-makers have a clear and proper concept of SEA. This narrowly-viewed application has limited the benefits of SEA, and has resulted in a rigid and incorrect idea that SEA was a passive impact-reducing mechanism; this may mislead the attitudes of planners to transport SEA. In fact, the emerging SEA is a re-engineered planning system framework that serves to remind planners that they are able to improve their efforts. It is a paradigm revolution, as the way in which planners think can make a vast difference. Thus, the potential for the emerging SEA concept to influence and integrate with transport planning and transport policy development processes depends not only on practical feasibility but also on a fundamental conceptual recognition of transport SEA. SEA could influence and integrate with transport planning and transport policy development processes if planners and decision-makers changed their ways of thinking. This study also found that a tiered and integrated transport SEA, embedded in the main transport planning process at different strategic levels, has great potential to embody the environmental and sustainable concerns in transport planning and decision-making. This finding is based on several contentions supported by the recent SEA studies showing that it should not be detached from the main planning process. SEA needs to be flexible in order to meet various policies, plans and programmes (PPP) demands, and it must be value-driven, not impact-oriented. A tiered, integrated transport SEA provides ways to overcome identified transport SEA application impediments. This two-in-one planning system is a simple solution which allows transport SEA to be conducted without involving complex legal processes. It improves institutional coordination and integrates not only with planning processes but also with values and resources.
Thesis (PhD Doctorate)
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Griffith School of Environment
Faculty of Science, Environment, Engineering and Technology
Full Text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

ISOLA, FEDERICA. "Strategic environmental assessment approach: governance and planning." Doctoral thesis, Università degli Studi di Cagliari, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/11584/266191.

Full text
Abstract:
The dissertation is framed within the topics of regional governance and Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA). Compared to its relationship with governance the SEA may be defined as a set of rules, principles, techniques and tools with the function of supporting the decision making process. The evaluation process is strategically relevant when applying the principles of environmental sustainability to regional and urban planning. SEA is a fundamental instrument for the environmental integration during the elaboration and adoption of plans; SEA offers an opportunity to bring about a real change of attitude and culture at strategic levels into strategic decision-making process; SEA, according to the Directive 2001/42/EC, provides the most adequate opportunity to integrate different regional planning methods. The dissertation mechanisms of regional governance, defined as the process involving the formation and implementation of decisions. The objective of this study is to analyse the relationships between the various stakeholders and governmental institutions, with the aim of defining in what terms, with reference to regional governance, the theoretical principles of sustainable development (in terms of managing the relationship between natural resources and economic development) can be applied to the planning phases. The main aim is to build a framework for sequential activities in the planning process, of a new model of governance able to relate to different levels of government, from a political level to a local level. The Sardinian case study contains some interesting aspects of planning and evaluation processes currently under way, which could be exported and developed further. However, it does suffer from several inconsistencies which are highlighted by the Directive 2001/42/EC. The innovative aspect of the research project, respect to the current planning situation of the SEA and the planning procedures, consists in the creation of a Protocol for the integration of the two approaches related to the construction of the plan and the activation process of SEA. In particular in the construction of system to accompany and support the government in adapting the plans, and secondly to support local authorities in the definition of strategic choices. Don’t exist in Sardinia a guidance for SEA process of general plan, This Guidance is intended to be valid for all plans from regional to urban plans by defining a decisional process where the SEA is part of the plan, creating a process more inclusive of aspects of environmental and public consultation. The involvement of consulting the public and authorities with environmental responsibilities is the goal of the new model of the assessment process.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

au, T. Wallington@murdoch edu, and Tabatha Jean Wallington. "Civic Environmental Pragmatism: A Dialogical Framework for Strategic Environmental Assessment." Murdoch University, 2002. http://wwwlib.murdoch.edu.au/adt/browse/view/adt-MU20040428.144248.

Full text
Abstract:
Questions of uncertainty and value conflict are increasingly pervasive challenges confronting policy makers seeking to address the range of environmental problems generated by contemporary technological systems. Yet these questions are ultimately political and moral in nature, and require a framework of strategic environmental assessment (SEA) that is marked by informed and democratic civic governance. Reflecting this, the original, civic purposes of environmental assessment (EA) embraced science and public participation as interdependent elements in the creation of more sustaining forms of human-nature interaction. However, formal models of EA have forsaken meaningful democratic engagement to technique. Based on the instrumentalist assumption that better science automatically leads to better policy, EA has externalised the civic source of political energy that underpins its environmental expertise. Moreover, debates become polarised when science is uncritically imported into the adversarial forums of interest-based politics,so that environmental science is increasingly unable to support political action. I shall argue that the revolutionary potential of SEA to transform the policy process rests upon a recovery of its original, civic purposes. My thesis is that a deeper understanding of the relationship between scientific knowledge and political action is required if SEA is to be rigorous, and also relevant to public concerns. Philosophical pragmatism contributes epistemological resources vital to this task. By situating knowledge in the context of practice, and by recognising the dialogical, judgmental nature of rationality, the practical philosophy of pragmatism reclaims the contextually embedded nature of inquiry. When science is embedded in a wider ethical context, the meaning and purposes of environmental knowledge become central questions of policy. The procedural ethics of both liberal and Habermasian politics cannot address these questions, however, because they relegate questions of the public good to the realm of individual choice. Instead, I argue that public dialogue, guided by a praxisoriented virtue ethics, is required to recover objective environmental goods in the policy process. I also argue that Aristotlean rhetoric, with its focus on the credibility of expertise, is the mode of persuasive argument most appropriate for dialogical public forums. The public philosophy of civic environmental pragmatism is therefore presented as a richer theoretical framework for understanding the contribution of both experts and citizens in the development of environmental knowledge for policy. As a dialogical framework for SEA, civic environmental pragmatism constructively combines the critical/normative and instrumental/descriptive aspects of policy inquiry, both of which are required in the development of socially robust knowledge and politically feasible policy decisions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Wallington, Tabatha Jean. "Civic environmental pragmatism: a dialogical framework for strategic environmental assessment." Thesis, Wallington, Tabatha Jean (2002) Civic environmental pragmatism: a dialogical framework for strategic environmental assessment. PhD thesis, Murdoch University, 2002. https://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/385/.

Full text
Abstract:
Questions of uncertainty and value conflict are increasingly pervasive challenges confronting policy makers seeking to address the range of environmental problems generated by contemporary technological systems. Yet these questions are ultimately political and moral in nature, and require a framework of strategic environmental assessment (SEA) that is marked by informed and democratic civic governance. Reflecting this, the original, civic purposes of environmental assessment (EA) embraced science and public participation as interdependent elements in the creation of more sustaining forms of human-nature interaction. However, formal models of EA have forsaken meaningful democratic engagement to technique. Based on the instrumentalist assumption that better science automatically leads to better policy, EA has externalised the civic source of political energy that underpins its environmental expertise. Moreover, debates become polarised when science is uncritically imported into the adversarial forums of interest-based politics, so that environmental science is increasingly unable to support political action. I shall argue that the revolutionary potential of SEA to transform the policy process rests upon a recovery of its original, civic purposes. My thesis is that a deeper understanding of the relationship between scientific knowledge and political action is required if SEA is to be rigorous, and also relevant to public concerns. Philosophical pragmatism contributes epistemological resources vital to this task. By situating knowledge in the context of practice, and by recognising the dialogical, judgmental nature of rationality, the practical philosophy of pragmatism reclaims the contextually embedded nature of inquiry. When science is embedded in a wider ethical context, the meaning and purposes of environmental knowledge become central questions of policy. The procedural ethics of both liberal and Habermasian politics cannot address these questions, however, because they relegate questions of the public good to the realm of individual choice. Instead, I argue that public dialogue, guided by a praxisoriented virtue ethics, is required to recover objective environmental goods in the policy process. I also argue that Aristotlean rhetoric, with its focus on the credibility of expertise, is the mode of persuasive argument most appropriate for dialogical public forums. The public philosophy of civic environmental pragmatism is therefore presented as a richer theoretical framework for understanding the contribution of both experts and citizens in the development of environmental knowledge for policy. As a dialogical framework for SEA, civic environmental pragmatism constructively combines the critical/normative and instrumental/descriptive aspects of policy inquiry, both of which are required in the development of socially robust knowledge and politically feasible policy decisions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Wallington, Tabatha Jean. "Civic environmental pragmatism : a dialogical framework for strategic environmental assessment /." Wallington, Tabatha Jean (2002) Civic environmental pragmatism: a dialogical framework for strategic environmental assessment. PhD thesis, Murdoch University, 2002. http://researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/385/.

Full text
Abstract:
Questions of uncertainty and value conflict are increasingly pervasive challenges confronting policy makers seeking to address the range of environmental problems generated by contemporary technological systems. Yet these questions are ultimately political and moral in nature, and require a framework of strategic environmental assessment (SEA) that is marked by informed and democratic civic governance. Reflecting this, the original, civic purposes of environmental assessment (EA) embraced science and public participation as interdependent elements in the creation of more sustaining forms of human-nature interaction. However, formal models of EA have forsaken meaningful democratic engagement to technique. Based on the instrumentalist assumption that better science automatically leads to better policy, EA has externalised the civic source of political energy that underpins its environmental expertise. Moreover, debates become polarised when science is uncritically imported into the adversarial forums of interest-based politics, so that environmental science is increasingly unable to support political action. I shall argue that the revolutionary potential of SEA to transform the policy process rests upon a recovery of its original, civic purposes. My thesis is that a deeper understanding of the relationship between scientific knowledge and political action is required if SEA is to be rigorous, and also relevant to public concerns. Philosophical pragmatism contributes epistemological resources vital to this task. By situating knowledge in the context of practice, and by recognising the dialogical, judgmental nature of rationality, the practical philosophy of pragmatism reclaims the contextually embedded nature of inquiry. When science is embedded in a wider ethical context, the meaning and purposes of environmental knowledge become central questions of policy. The procedural ethics of both liberal and Habermasian politics cannot address these questions, however, because they relegate questions of the public good to the realm of individual choice. Instead, I argue that public dialogue, guided by a praxisoriented virtue ethics, is required to recover objective environmental goods in the policy process. I also argue that Aristotlean rhetoric, with its focus on the credibility of expertise, is the mode of persuasive argument most appropriate for dialogical public forums. The public philosophy of civic environmental pragmatism is therefore presented as a richer theoretical framework for understanding the contribution of both experts and citizens in the development of environmental knowledge for policy. As a dialogical framework for SEA, civic environmental pragmatism constructively combines the critical/normative and instrumental/descriptive aspects of policy inquiry, both of which are required in the development of socially robust knowledge and politically feasible policy decisions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Azcarate, Juan. "Fostering Participation and Dialogue Using Strategic Environmental Assessment." Licentiate thesis, KTH, Miljöbedömning och -förvaltning, 2011. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-46202.

Full text
Abstract:
Various international conventions and several theories and approaches from the planning and environment fields of study have focused on enhancing the public’s access to information and its participation in strategic decision making. However, it seems that it is challenging to encourage a meaningful public participation in decision making processes, since it is difficult to engage civil society in strategic discussions, it is complex to institutionalise participative processes, and it is demanding to include traditionally marginalised groups in current debates on development. Despite this, it appears that deciding how participative approaches should be designed and when these approaches should be applied is of crucial importance to secure appropriate forums for dialogue. To study these claims and foster participation and dialogue, a study was carried out to examine the development of flexible, adaptable and participative strategic environmental assessment processes. Even though designing the processes demanded time and constant adaptation, it is argued that adequately conceptualising and implementing flexible, adaptable and participative approaches to strategic environmental assessment can lead to inclusive, legitimate and anchored outputs that can significantly influence decision making processes.
QC 20111115
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Iryna, Usava. "STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT IN A COUNTRY OF TRANSITION:." Thesis, Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, Sektionen för teknokultur, humaniora och samhällsbyggnad, 2005. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:bth-1400.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract SEA is currently becoming an important tool for sustainable development. The main principles of SEA are to incorporate environmental considerations to the process of development of strategic documents and to make the process of the decision-making more transparent. Over the past years, there have been an increasing number of countries especially transitional and developing countries such as Belarus that consider joining the international conventions for SEA such as EU Directive 2001/42/EC (the SEA Directive) and UNECE SEA Protocol. This research focuses on the capacity assessment for SEA implementation in Belarus. The benchmarks for SEA capacity assessment were defined. For identifying the approaches for SEA implementation in the countries in transition, the experience of the countries of Central and Eastern Europe was analyzed. The capacity assessment for Belarus was made involved three levels, namely, system level, as well as organizational and individual levels. The paper analyses strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats for SEA implementation in Belarus. The study concludes with some suggestions that might help to improve capacity for SEA implementation.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Muir, Michael Christopher. "Lifecycle Assessment for Strategic Product Design and Management." Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/1853/19878.

Full text
Abstract:
With the advent of digital imaging technology, the options available to consumers in consumer imaging have increased tremendously. From image capture through image processing and output, many options have emerged; however, the relative environmental impacts of these different options are not clear cut. Simplistically, one might say that the use of a digital camera has a lesser environmental burden than the use of a reloadable film camera because the image produced as a result of using the digital camera avoids chemicals in film developing. However, digital cameras require electronics and computers that need energy; and, energy production is one of the contributors to greenhouse gasses like CO2. Assessment of the environmental impacts of these different options can help provide feedback to decision makers and insights that will help reduce environmental impact through product system design. One tool that has been used to relate environmental impacts with functions provide to consumers through products or services is Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). LCA, which has been standardized by the International Standards Organization (ISO) in ISO14000, is used here to evaluate both traditional film and digital imaging systems. Data from publicly available databases and both external and internal Eastman Kodak Company studies were utilized to develop LCA modules for the different processes involved. Product and service business models are explored for both technologies through ten different imaging and output scenarios. The functional unit used is the capture, processing and output of one 4 x6 image. Four impact categories (energy use, greenhouse emission, water use and waste generation) across four life cycle phases (upstream, distribution, use, and end of life) are explored for the ten scenarios. LCA is also evaluated as a tool to help facilitate strategic level environmental performance issues with both new and established business activities. Sensitivity analysis is also performed to evaluate the impact of assumptions made in the course of the assessment and comments are made regarding the effectiveness of LCA for strategic assessment and product service strategies in lowering environmental impact. Results indicate that the lowest impact scenarios are Digital Capture to LCD Display for Greenhouse Emissions and Energy Use and Film Capture to Wholesale Print for Water Use and Waste Generation. Highest impacts were seen for Greenhouse Emissions in the Film Capture to Retail Print scenario. In the Energy Use and Water Use category, the Digital Capture to CRT Computer Display was the highest scenario. For Waste Generation, the Digital Capture to Inkjet Print was the highest impact scenario.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Strategic environmental assessment"

1

1960-, Therivel Riki, and Royal Society for the Protection of Birds., eds. Strategic environmental assessment. London: Earthscan Publications, 1992.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

P, Adhikari Ambika, Khadka Ram B, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources., Asian Regional Environmental Assessment Program., and South and Southeast Asian Regional Training Workshop on Strategic Environmental Assessment (1997 : Kathmandu, Nepal), eds. Strategic environmental assessment. [Kathmandu]: IUCN-The World Conservation Union, 1998.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Sadler, Barry. Strategic environmental assessment. Hague: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planing and the Environment, 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

South Africa. Dept. of Environmental Affairs and Tourism., ed. Strategic environmental assessment. Pretoria, South Africa: Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, 2007.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Schmidt, Michael, Elsa João, and Eike Albrecht, eds. Implementing Strategic Environmental Assessment. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/b138661.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Partidário, Maria do Rosário. Bibliography on strategic environmental assessment. [Ottawa]: Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Kleinschmidt, Volker, and Dieter Wagner, eds. Strategic Environmental Assessment in Europe. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3091-4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Rosário, Partidário Maria do, and Clark Ray 1947-, eds. Perspectives on strategic environmental assessment. Boca Raton, Fla: Lewis Publishers, 2000.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Simon, Marsden, and Dovers Stephen, eds. Strategic environmental assessment in Australasia. Sydney: The Federation Press, 2002.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Commission, Bhutan National Environment, ed. Strategic environmental assessment: Sectoral guidelines. Thimphu: National Environment Commission, 1999.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Strategic environmental assessment"

1

Jones, Carys. "Strategic Environmental Assessment." In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, 6344–47. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_3370.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Partidario, Maria Rosario. "Strategic environmental assessment." In Routledge Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment, 22–41. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429282492-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Somevi, Joseph. "Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment." In Solutions to Climate Change Challenges in the Built Environment, 75–86. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444354539.ch7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Wulff, Henrik. "Strategic Environmental Assessment in Denmark." In Strategic Environmental Assessment in Europe, 59–61. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3091-4_12.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Soveri, Ulla-Riitta. "Strategic Environmental Assessment in Finland." In Strategic Environmental Assessment in Europe, 70–71. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3091-4_14.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Canelas, Leonel. "Strategic Environmental Assessment in Portugal." In Strategic Environmental Assessment in Europe, 119–21. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3091-4_26.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Lind, Terje. "Strategic Environmental Assessment in Norway." In Strategic Environmental Assessment in Europe, 147–49. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3091-4_33.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Tesli, Arne. "Strategic Environmental Assessment in Norway." In Strategic Environmental Assessment in Europe, 150–55. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3091-4_34.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Bastin, Joëlle, and Paul Herman. "Environmental Assessment in Belgium (Walloon Region)." In Strategic Environmental Assessment in Europe, 52–54. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3091-4_10.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Petek, Waltraud. "Strategic Environmental Assessment — Austrian SEA Study." In Strategic Environmental Assessment in Europe, 47–51. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3091-4_9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Strategic environmental assessment"

1

Craze, Andrew, Pete Davis, and Matthew Clark. "Strategic Environmental Assessment for UK LLW Management." In ASME 2009 12th International Conference on Environmental Remediation and Radioactive Waste Management. ASMEDC, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/icem2009-16392.

Full text
Abstract:
NDA is delivering a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) to underpin the UK Nuclear Industry Low Level Waste Strategy. The purpose of this assessment is embed sustainability issues into our decision making and to fulfil our requirements under the European Union’s Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Directive (2004/42/EU) and transposing UK Regulations, and to underpin the development of the strategy. The outputs of the SEA have provided input into particular aspects of the strategy, leading to a more robust and better informed result. Development of options to be assessed under the SEA has looked at a number of factors, including: • what the strategy is aiming to achieve; • expectation from stakeholders as to what should be addressed; • consideration of tactical approaches to implementation of the strategy in addition to high level strategic issues; • links to other projects and programmes (for example the Environmental Safety Case for the Low Level Waste Repository. The SEA aims to provide a robust assessment of the environmental and sustainability impacts of alternative strategies for providing continued capability and capacity for the management and disposal of LLW in the UK. The assessment also considers other, more tactical, issues around implementation of the strategy, for example: issues around the location of LLW management facilities; the environmental impacts of alternative waste treatment options (metal recycling etc); considerations of alternative approaches to the classification of radioactive waste and opportunities that would result. Critical to the development of the SEA has been the involvement of statutory and non-statutory stakeholders, who have informed both the output and the approach taken.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Chen, Chi-Feng. "Applications of Energy Security Assessment in Strategic Environmental Assessment." In World Renewable Energy Congress – Sweden, 8–13 May, 2011, Linköping, Sweden. Linköping University Electronic Press, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.3384/ecp110572409.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Cole, P., and M. Broderick. "Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA): an exploration of synergies through development of a Strategic Environmental Framework (SEF)." In SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 2007. Southampton, UK: WIT Press, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/sdp070301.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Schöch, Hartmut, Harald Florin, and Michael Betz. "Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in Strategic Risk Management." In 2001 Environmental Sustainability Conference & Exhibition. 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA, United States: SAE International, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.4271/2001-01-3776.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Almenar-Muñoz, M. "The Strategic Environmental Assessment as a sustainable territorial planning procedure." In ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT 2016. Southampton UK: WIT Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/eid160061.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Atherton, Elizabeth, and Ann McCall. "Strategic Environmental Assessment and Environmental Impact Assessment as Part of a Stepwise Decision Making Process." In ASME 2003 9th International Conference on Radioactive Waste Management and Environmental Remediation. ASMEDC, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/icem2003-4896.

Full text
Abstract:
Nirex is the organisation responsible for long-term radioactive waste management in the UK. Our Mission is to provide the UK with safe, environmentally sound and publicly acceptable options for the long-term management of radioactive materials. One of the lessons that Nirex has learned from previous experience in the UK and internationally is the importance of developing due process for finding a long-term solution for radioactive waste management. We have been investigating best practice in this area and incorporating the findings into the work that we undertake. Projects which will have an impact on the environment are subject to EC Directives on Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) and Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). The EIA Directive has already been implemented into law within Member States while the SEA Directive has to be implemented by 2004. Nirex believes that radioactive waste management programmes will have to adhere to the principles outlined in the Directives. Nirex has been investigating how the frameworks set out in the Directives could be used to: • Develop a stepwise approach to decision making in the UK; • Engage stakeholders during the stepwise decision making; • Enable stakeholders’ issues and concerns to be addressed. This paper will outline how Nirex has been developing its work in these areas including reference to the Nirex Involvement Programme, which uses different consultation and dialogue techniques to enable people to engage with Nirex’s work programme.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

de Andrade, Luis, Paulo de Oliveira, and Teresa Ponce de Leao. "Current Strategic Environmental Assessment in the electrical industry." In 2011 11th International Conference on Electrical Power Quality and Utilisation - (EPQU). IEEE, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/epqu.2011.6128899.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

"Strategic Environmental Assessment of the Docklands Master Plan." In 2005 European Real Estate Society conference in association with the International Real Estate Society: ERES Conference 2005. ERES, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.15396/eres2005_289.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Boyd, Heather. "Challenges in Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment for Shale Development." In SPE E&P Health, Safety, Security and Environmental Conference-Americas. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/173499-ms.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Wu, Linlin, Long Chen, and Jianyi Liu. "The Application of Strategic Environmental Assessment on Traffic Planning." In Second International Conference on Transportation Engineering. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/41039(345)426.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Reports on the topic "Strategic environmental assessment"

1

Yaron, Gil, and Peter Nelson. Topic Guide: Strategic environmental assessment in practice: Capturing lessons learned over the past 10 years. Evidence on Demand, March 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.12774/eod_tg.sea.march2014.yaronnelson.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Tooman, T. P. Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program: Atmospheric Remote Sensing and Assessment Program -- Final Report. Part 1: The lower atmosphere. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), January 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/481513.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

N. Environmental Assessment for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve West Hackberry Facility Raw Water Intake Pipeline Replacement Cameron and Calcasieu Parishes, Louisiana. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), August 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/832847.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Mahaffey, J. A., P. G. Doctor, R. L. Buschbom, C. S. Glantz, P. M. Daling, L. E. Sever, G. J. Jr Vargo, et al. A strategic analysis study-based approach to integrated risk assessment: Occupational health risks from environmental restoration and waste management activities at Hanford. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), June 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/6760022.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Mahaffey, J. A., P. G. Doctor, R. L. Buschbom, C. S. Glantz, P. M. Daling, L. E. Sever, G. J. Jr Vargo, et al. A strategic analysis study-based approach to integrated risk assessment: Occupational health risks from environmental restoration and waste management activities at Hanford. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), June 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/10161643.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Humphrey, Brandt M., and Aubrey Higginbotham. Environmental Assessment: Lease with Omaha Public Power District (PPD) to Support New United States Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM) Facility and Existing Base Load. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, February 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada614638.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Humphrey, Brandt M., and Aubrey Higginbotham. Final Environmental Assessment: Lease with Omaha Public Power District (OPPD) to Support New United States Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM) Facility and Existing Base Load. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, February 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada614560.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

N. Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Increase in the Facility Capacity and Petroleum Inventory at the Strategic Petroleum Reserve's Bryan Mound Storage Facility, Texas. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), November 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/837339.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

N. Finding of No Significant Impact for the Environmental Assessment for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve West Hackberry Facility Raw Water Intake Pipeline Replacement Cameron and Calcasieu Parishes, Louisiana. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), August 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/832848.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Edward A. Parson and William C. Clark. Assessment strategies for global environmental change. Final report. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), November 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/764579.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Strategic environmental assessment' for particular source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography