Academic literature on the topic 'Statue Court'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Statue Court.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Statue Court"
Oktaviana, Mega. "YURISDIKSI INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT (ICC) DALAM PENEGAKAN PELANGGARAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA BERAT OLEH OMAR HASSAN AL-BASHIR DI DARFUR, SUDAN." BELLI AC PACIS 7, no. 2 (March 11, 2022): 59. http://dx.doi.org/10.20961/belli.v7i2.59993.
Full textJoo, Samantha. "Counter-narratives: Rizpah and the ‘comfort women’ statue." Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 44, no. 1 (August 8, 2019): 79–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0309089218772572.
Full textSpingler, Michael. "The Actor and the Statue: Space, Time, and Court Performance in Molière's Dom Juan." Comparative Drama 25, no. 4 (1991): 351–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/cdr.1991.0030.
Full textMunby, Thomas. "Fraud exception to privilege: Addlesee & Ors v Dentons Europe LLP [2020] EWHC 238 (Ch)." Trusts & Trustees 26, no. 5 (June 1, 2020): 409–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttaa034.
Full textDash, Amrutanshu, and Dhruv Sharma. "Arrest Warrants at the International Criminal Court: Reasonable Suspicion or Reasonable Grounds to Believe?" International Criminal Law Review 16, no. 1 (February 5, 2016): 158–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718123-01601004.
Full textDibu, Worku, and Abtewold Moges. "Assessment of the International Criminal Court’s Prosecutor Role in Darfur Crisis, Sudan (the case of Omer Al-Bashir)." International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 6, no. 3 (August 27, 2019): 1034. http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i3.995.
Full textLenclud, Gérard. "La Statue du Commandeur (Note critique)." Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales 48, no. 5 (October 1993): 1221–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/ahess.1993.279208.
Full textAljahani, Abdelnaser. "THE NEED TO AMEND ARTICLE 38 OF THE STATUE OF THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE." PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences 4, no. 3 (November 22, 2018): 287–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2018.43.287297.
Full textGill, David, and Joan Padgham. "‘One find of capital importance’: a reassessment of the statue of User from Knossos." Annual of the British School at Athens 100 (November 2005): 41–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0068245400021146.
Full textBrodie, Neil. "The role of conservators in facilitating the theft and trafficking of cultural objects: the case of a seized Libyan statue." Libyan Studies 48 (September 14, 2017): 117–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/lis.2017.1.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Statue Court"
Masose, Tariro Veronica P. "The Prosecution of sexual violence crimes under article 7 and 8 of the rome statue of the international criminal court: A reason for optimism?'." University of the Western Cape, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/11394/5831.
Full textThe Rome Statute gave birth to the International Criminal Court (ICC) on 17 July 1998. Its mandate is to assist the international community in the arduous task of closing the gap of impunity for the most heinous crimes, namely war crimes, crimes of aggression, genocide and crimes against humanity. For the first time in the history of humankind, States accepted the jurisdiction of a permanent international criminal court, for the prosecution of the perpetrators of the most serious crimes committed within their territories or by nationals after the entry into force of the Rome Statute on 1 July 2002. The ICC is an international organization, with distinct legal capacity. It is independent of the United Nations although it does act in close association with it. The ICC is not a substitute for national courts. The Rome Statute provides that it is still very much the duty of the State to exercise its jurisdiction over those responsible for international crimes. The ICC can only intervene as a court of last resort where a State is unwilling or unable to carry out the investigation and prosecute the perpetrators within its own domestic courts and laws. It may only exercise jurisdiction over crimes committed on the territory of a State party or a national of such, the only exception to this is that the United Security Council can use its powers under the UN Charter to refer situations to the Prosecutor of the ICC. The ICC is therefore meant to compliment and support domestic criminal justice; this was reflected even in the drafting stages of the Statute whereby integration of a variety of national perspectives and judicial cultures from different countries was considered in order to ensure that the ICC did not depart from what is considered just within the domestic sphere. It may well be argued that the Rome Statute provides an opportunity to reinvigorate and reform criminal codes which may in the long term globally strengthen the rule of law, peace and security.
Miller, Banks P. "State Success in State Supreme Courts: Judges, Litigants and State Solicitors." Columbus, Ohio : Ohio State University, 2009. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc%5Fnum=osu1243004656.
Full textMohd, Hassan Fareed. "National prosecution against heads of state of non-state parties to the Rome Statute in southeast Asia : challenges and prospects under the complementarity principle." Thesis, University of Aberdeen, 2018. http://digitool.abdn.ac.uk:80/webclient/DeliveryManager?pid=237101.
Full textWafula, Tumani Regina. "Implementation of the Rome statute in Kenya : legal and institutional challenges in relation to the change from dualism to monism." University of the Western Cape, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/11394/4632.
Full textThe new Kenyan constitution has introduced an immediate monist approach of implementing international legal standards. Accordingly, the transformation from dual to monism will necessitate a discussion of theories of incorporation of international instruments into national laws. This will set the basis of what method Kenya should follow. This paper attempts to address potential procedural problems with implementing the Rome Statute in a new monist Kenya and will argue that as a precautionary measure during the country’s transition any deviation, by the court, from national law will require articulation and justification under an international framework. It will include a review of the Kenyan International Crimes Act 2003 (ICA) and its adoption into the domestic law of Kenya. It will also include examination of previous situations where domestic courts have applied international law standards in domestic trials before and after the monist Constitution of 2010. This paper aims at assessing the key challenges to the effective implementation of the Rome Statute in Kenya both objectively and substantively. It examines the challenges facing the Kenyan courts in relation to the exercise of universal jurisdiction and the criminalization of international crimes. It will seek to point out the weaknesses and conflict between the Kenyan constitution, The International Crimes Act and the Rome Statute. The ICA was silent on some aspects of the Rome Statute and the paper will attempt to discuss these issues and what they portend in the implementation of the Rome statute in monism. It will also discuss the effect of the new constitution on the practical operation of the Rome Statue. The operational capacity of institutions mandated with practical implementation of the Rome Statute will be examined. It will further seek to ascertain whether the laws and policies reflect Kenya’s commitment to international criminal justice. By way of conclusion, the paper will create a possible inventory of issues, which might arise in Kenya’s prosecution of International crimes under the Rome Statute, and suggestions on how such issues could best be addressed.
Moussavou, Charlène Mirca. "Le statut de victime de crimes internationaux devant la cour pénale internationale." Thesis, Aix-Marseille, 2014. http://www.theses.fr/2014AIXM1097.
Full textTo the atrocities experienced by the 19th and 20th centuries in terms of mass crimes, many attempts have led the international community to create an international criminal court to prosecute those responsible for the "big war crimes" during global conflicts. Through the letter and spirit of the Statute of the International Criminal Court, we note with relief the renewed interest of the international criminal justice for the victim and for its reconstruction. Until then, it was mainly focused on the criminal, the first goal of the latter being the fight against impunity. One of the major innovations made by the Rome Statute is the central place for victims in the proceedings. Unlike its predecessors, the ICC gives them both a criminal and civil status ; they have a right to participate in criminal proceedings from its beginning under conditions strictly controlled by the judge and a right to compensation for damage suffered. But what is the real victim involvement in these processes, and what are its limitations and practical implications to the objectives originally set extension ? This study aims to conduct a thorough review of the device providing the rights of victims of international crimes and an analysis of its first applications
Perkins, Jared David. "Friends of the State Courts: Organized Interests and State Courts of Last Resort." Thesis, University of North Texas, 2016. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc955125/.
Full textMangezi, Mutsa. "International law before municipal courts: the role of International Court of Justice decisions in domestic court proceedings with specific reference to United States case examples." Thesis, Rhodes University, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1007325.
Full textNgari, Allan Rutambo. "State cooperation within the context of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court : a critical reflection." Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/80212.
Full textBibliography
ENGLISH ABSTRACT: This thesis is a reflection of the provisions of the Rome Statute in relation to the most fundamental condition for the effective functioning of the Court – the cooperation of states. It broadly examines the challenges experienced by the Court with respect to application of Part IX such as whether non-State Parties to the Rome Statute can, notwithstanding their right not to be party, be compelled to cooperate with the Court owing to the customary international law obligation for all States to repress, find and punish persons alleged to have committed the crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court (war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide). This is particularly challenging where such persons are nationals of non-States Parties. The various meanings of international cooperation in criminal matters is discussed with reference to and distinguished from the cooperation regime of the International Criminal Tribunals for Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia. For States Parties to the Rome Statute, the thesis evaluates the measure of their inability or unwillingness to genuinely prosecute persons alleged to have committed crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court within the context of the principle of complementarity. It seeks to address, where such inability or unwillingness has been determined by the Court, how effective the cooperation between the States Parties and the Court could best serve the interests of justice. The thesis answers the question on what extent the principle of complementarity influences the cooperation of States with the Court, whether or not these States are party to the Rome Statute. The concept of positive complementarity that establishes a measure of cooperation between the Court and the national criminal jurisdictions is further explored in the context of the Court’s capacity to strengthen local ownership of the enforcement of international criminal justice. A nuanced discussion on the practice of the Court with respect to the right of persons before the Court is developed. The rights of an accused in different phases of Court proceedings and the rights of victims and affected communities of crimes within the Court’s jurisdiction are considered at length and in the light of recently-established principles regulating the Court’s treatment of these individuals. These persons are key interlocutors in the international criminal justice system and have shifted the traditional focus of international law predominantly from states to individuals and bring about a different kind of relationship between States as a collective and their treatment of these individuals arising from obligations to the Rome Statute. Finally the thesis interrogates the enforcement mechanisms under the Rome Statute. Unlike States, the Court does not have an enforcement entity such as a Police Force that would arrest persons accused of committing crimes within its jurisdiction, conduct searches and seizures or compel witnesses to appear before the Court. Yet, the Court must critically assess its practice of enforcing sentences that it imposes on convicted persons and in its contribution to restorative justice, the enforcement of reparations orders in collaboration with other Rome Statute entities such as the Trust Fund for Victims.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Hierdie tesis is 'n weerspieëling van die bepalings van die Statuut van Rome in verhouding tot die mees fundamentele voorwaarde vir die effektiewe funksionering van die Hof - die samewerking van State. Dit ondersoek breedweg die uitdagings wat deur die Hof ervaar word met betrekking tot die toepassing van Deel IX soos byvoorbeeld of State wat nie partye is tot die Statuut van Rome, nieteenstaande hul reg om nie deel te wees nie, verplig kan word om saam te werk met die Hof weens die internasionale gewoontereg verpligting om alle persone wat na bewering misdade gepleeg het binne die jurisdiksie van die Hof (oorlogsmisdade, misdade teen die mensdom en volksmoord) te verhinder, vind en straf. Dit is veral uitdagend waar sodanige persone burgers is van State wat nie partye is nie. Die verskillende betekenisse van die internasionale samewerking in kriminele sake word bespreek met verwysing na, en onderskei van, die samewerkende stelsel van die Internasionale Kriminele Tribunale vir Rwanda en die voormalige Joego-Slawië. Vir State wat partye is tot die Statuut van Rome, evalueer die tesis - in die konteks van die beginsel van komplementariteit - die mate van hul onvermoë, of ongewilligheid om werklik persone te vervolg wat na bewering misdade gepleeg het binne die jurisdiksie van die Hof. Dit poog om aan te spreek, waar so 'n onvermoë of ongewilligheid bepaal is deur die Hof, hoe effektiewe samewerking tussen State wat partye is en die Hof, die belange van geregtigheid die beste kan dien. Die tesis beantwoord die vraag op watter mate die beginsel van komplementariteit die samewerking van die State met die Hof beïnvloed, ongeag of hierdie State partye is tot die Statuut van Rome. Die konsep van positiewe komplementariteit wat samewerking vestig tussen die Hof en die nasionale jurisdiksies aangaande kriminele sake word verder ondersoek in die konteks van die Hof se vermoë om plaaslike eienaarskap in die handhawing van die internasionale kriminele regstelsel te versterk. 'n Genuanseerde bespreking op die praktyk van die Hof met betrekking tot die reg van persone voor die Hof word ontwikkel. Die regte van 'n beskuldigde in die verskillende fases van die hof verrigtinge en die regte van slagoffers en geaffekteerde gemeenskappe van misdade binne die hof se jurisdiksie word in diepte bespreek in die lig van die onlangs gevestigde beginsels wat die Hof se behandeling van hierdie individue reguleer. Hierdie persone is sleutel gespreksgenote in die internasionale kriminele regstelsel en het die tradisionele fokus verskuif van die internasionale reg van State na individue, en bring oor 'n ander soort verhouding tussen State as 'n kollektiewe en hulle behandeling van hierdie individue as gevolg van hul verpligtinge aan die Statuut van Rome. Ten slotte bevraagteken die tesis die handhawings meganismes onder die Statuut van Rome. In teenstelling met State, het die Hof nie 'n handhawing entiteit soos 'n Polisiemag wat persone kon arresteer wat beskuldig word van misdade binne sy jurisdiksie, deursoek en beslagleggings uitvoer of persone dwing om as getuies te verskyn voor die Hof nie. Tog, moet die Hof sy praktyk van uitvoering van vonnisse wat dit oplê op veroordeelde persone en in sy bydrae tot herstellende geregtigheid die handhawing van herstelling in samewerking met ander Statuut van Rome entiteite soos die Trust Fonds vir Slagoffers krities assesseer.
Stagel, Daniela. "Sicherheitsrat und Internationaler Strafgerichtshof : zur Abgrenzung ihrer Kompetenzen nach der Charta der Vereinten Nationen und dem Römischen Statut /." Hamburg : Kovač, 2008. http://www.verlagdrkovac.de/978-3-8300-3379-0.htm.
Full textNorris, Mikel, and Colin Ross Glennon. "Gendered Vulnerability and State Supreme Court Elections." Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University, 2017. https://dc.etsu.edu/etsu-works/528.
Full textBooks on the topic "Statue Court"
Bassiouni, M. Cherif. Draft statute, International Tribunal =: Projet de statut du Tribunal pénal international = Proyecto de estatuto del Tribunal Penal Internacional. [Pau, France]: Association internationale de droit pénal, 1993.
Find full textConference of State Court Administrators, National Center for State Courts, and United States. Bureau of Justice Statistics, eds. State court organization, 1998. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2000.
Find full textMelious, Jean O. "Guide us on our way": Parks, atheists, Pat Robertson's crusading lawyers, and a 15-foot statue of Jesus meet in the Seventh Circuit. [Chicago, Ill: Planning and Law Division, American Planning Association, 2000.
Find full textBassiouni, M. Cherif. Draft statute, International Criminal Tribunal. [Pau, France]: Association internationale de droit pénal, 1992.
Find full textPublishers, Butterworth Legal, ed. Rules of the district and municipal courts in Washington: State, local. Seattle: Butterworth Legal Publishers, 1987.
Find full textAdministration, Minnesota State Court, and Minnesota Supreme Court, eds. State assumption of trial court administration costs. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Supreme Court, State Court Administrator's Office, 2001.
Find full textCourts, Maine Legislature Commission to Study Priorities and Timing of Judicial Proceedings in State. Final report of the Commission to Study Priorities and Timing of Judicial Proceedings in State Courts. Augusta, ME: Office of Policy & Legal Analysis, 2011.
Find full textHawaii. Legislature. Office of the Legislative Auditor., EMT Associates (Sacramento, Calif.), and Peat Marwick Main & Co., eds. Management and financial audit of the Judiciary of the State of Hawaii: A report to the governor and the Legislature of the State of Hawaii. Honolulu, Hawaii: The Legislative Auditor, 1989.
Find full textFlorida. Legislature. Senate. Committee on Appropriations. Implementation of an integrated computer system for the state court system. Tallahassee]: Senate State of Florida, 2003.
Find full textBNA's directory of state and federal courts, judges, and clerks: A state-by-state and federal listing. 2nd ed. Arlington, VA: Bureau of National Affairs, 2012.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Statue Court"
Renfro, Jayme L. "State Court Systems." In State and Local Politics, 97–107. New York, NY: Routledge, 2021.: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429056895-9.
Full textTarr, G. Alan. "State Court Policymaking." In Judicial Process and Judicial Policymaking, 332–62. Seventh edition. | New York, NY : Routledge, 2019.: Routledge, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429427961-11.
Full textSonnevend, Pál. "The Responsibility of Courts in Maintaining the Rule of Law: Two Tales of Consequential Judicial Self-Restraint." In Defending Checks and Balances in EU Member States, 155–81. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62317-6_7.
Full textPrek, Miro, and Silvère Lefèvre. "The General Court as the EU Competition Court?" In EU Competition and State Aid Rules, 39–48. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47962-9_2.
Full textAdkison, Danny M., and Lisa McNair Palmer. "Judicial Department." In The Oklahoma State Constitution, 123–34. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197514818.003.0010.
Full textPfander, James E. "The Supreme Court and the State Courts." In One Supreme Court, 81–102. Oxford University Press, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195340334.003.005.
Full textShapiro, H. A. "Periphrôn Pênelopeia." In New Directions in the Study of Women in the Greco-Roman World, 29–44. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190937638.003.0003.
Full textSteinglass, Steven H., and Gino J. Scarselli. "Judicial." In The Ohio State Constitution, 289—C4.P207. 2nd ed. Oxford University PressNew York, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197619728.003.0006.
Full textHarrison, John C. "International Law in U.S. Courts within the Limits of the Constitution." In The Restatement and Beyond, 265–80. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197533154.003.0012.
Full textPodany, Amanda H. "Gift Recipients and Royal In-Laws." In Weavers, Scribes, and Kings, 369—C15.F3. Oxford University PressNew York, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190059040.003.0015.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Statue Court"
Harper, Glenn. "Becoming Ultra-Civic: The Completion of Queen’s Square, Sydney 1962-1978." In The 38th Annual Conference of the Society of Architectural Historians Australia and New Zealand. online: SAHANZ, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.55939/a4009pijuv.
Full textBiczó, András. "In the Service of the State – Analysis of the Josephinist Policy and Reforms Regarding the Hungarian Court Organization. Analyzing some Oath Formulas Used at the Erection of Iudicia Subalterna." In Mezinárodní konference doktorských studentů oboru právní historie a římského práva. Brno: Masaryk University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/cz.muni.p280-0156-2022-7.
Full textJovanović, Zoran, and Stefan Andonović. "UPRAVNO SUDSTVO PREMA VIDOVDANSKOM USTAVU." In 100 GODINA OD VIDOVDANSKOG USTAVA. Faculty of law, University of Kragujevac, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.46793/zbvu21.233j.
Full textPoretti, Paula, and Vedrana Švedl Blažeka. "REMOTE JUSTICE IN CORONAVIRUS CRISIS – DO THE MEANS JUSTIFY THE ENDS, OR DO THE ENDS JUSTIFY THE MEANS?" In The recovery of the EU and strengthening the ability to respond to new challenges – legal and economic aspects. Faculty of Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.25234/eclic/22410.
Full textTuranjanin, Veljko. "UNFORESEEABILITY AND ABUSE OF CRIMINAL LAW DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC IN SERBIA." In EU 2021 – The future of the EU in and after the pandemic. Faculty of Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.25234/eclic/18305.
Full textKačer, Hrvoje, Blanka Kačer, and Fani Milan Ostojić. "QUO VADIS CHF CASE – STANjE U REPUBLICI HRVATSKOJ 2022. GOD. … ILI KADA ĆE BANKE (I JOŠ NEKI) KONAČNO SHVATITI." In XVIII Majsko savetovanje. University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Law, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.46793/xviiimajsko.169k.
Full textKačer, Hrvoje. "CHF CASE – 2019. god." In XV Majsko savetovanje: Sloboda pružanja usluga i pravna sigurnost. University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Law, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.46793/xvmajsko.153k.
Full textLumb, David. "Status of IXO and the ESA CV Programme." In Fast X-ray timing and spectroscopy at extreme count rates. Trieste, Italy: Sissa Medialab, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.22323/1.122.0002.
Full textПопанова, Аниса Асламбековна. "ADVISORY JURISDICTION OF THE UN INTERNATIONAL COURT." In Образование. Культура. Общество: сборник избранных статей по материалам Международной научной конференции (Санкт-Петербург, Июнь 2020). Crossref, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.37539/ecs291.2020.58.55.029.
Full textSewall, Sarah. "NATION STATES AND THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT." In Proceedings of the Forty-Eighth Pugwash Conference on Science and World Affairs. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789812810212_0036.
Full textReports on the topic "Statue Court"
Yadav, Mukesh, and Deepika Jha. Re-Examine the Model to Manage Revenue Court Cases in Uttar Pradesh. Indian Institute for Human Settlements, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.24943/remmrccup03.2022.
Full textHaider, Huma. Constitutional Courts: Approaches, Sequencing, And Political Support. Institute of Development Studies, June 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/k4d.2022.097.
Full textTrump, William. Asynchronous ASCII Event Count Status Code. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, March 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada628275.
Full textTendall, Jeanna M. The United States' Views Toward the International Criminal Court. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, April 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada404496.
Full textWatson, Rickey. The United States' Rejection of the International Criminal Court: A Strategic Error. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, May 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada486522.
Full textGraef, Katherine. The European Court of Human Rights: Implications for United States National Security. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, February 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada613370.
Full textKokinda, Timothy A. Impact of the International Criminal Court on United States National Security Policy. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, April 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada420171.
Full textAIR WAR COLL MAXWELL AFB AL. Manual for Courts-Martial United States. 2002 Edition. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, January 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada435980.
Full textDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE WASHINGTON DC. Manual for Courts-Martial United States 1998 Edition. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, January 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada361197.
Full textDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE WASHINGTON DC. Manual for Courts-Martial, United States 1995 Edition. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, January 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada325109.
Full text