Academic literature on the topic 'Stationary set preserving'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Stationary set preserving.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Stationary set preserving"
Claverie, Benjamin, and Ralf Schindler. "Increasing u2 by a stationary set preserving forcing." Journal of Symbolic Logic 74, no. 1 (March 2009): 187–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.2178/jsl/1231082308.
Full textFriedman, Sy D. "Cardinal-preserving extensions." Journal of Symbolic Logic 68, no. 4 (December 2003): 1163–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.2178/jsl/1067620178.
Full textAudrito, Giorgio, and Matteo Viale. "Absoluteness via resurrection." Journal of Mathematical Logic 17, no. 02 (November 27, 2017): 1750005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0219061317500052.
Full textDOEBLER, PHILIPP. "RADO'S CONJECTURE IMPLIES THAT ALL STATIONARY SET PRESERVING FORCINGS ARE SEMIPROPER." Journal of Mathematical Logic 13, no. 01 (May 28, 2013): 1350001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0219061313500013.
Full textFu, Weihua, Cheng Wang, and Jianwei Chen. "Operational Modal Analysis for Vibration Control Following Moving Window Locality Preserving Projections for Linear Slow-Time-Varying Structures." Applied Sciences 11, no. 2 (January 15, 2021): 791. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app11020791.
Full textOnyshkevych, Sofiya, and Martin Siebenborn. "Mesh Quality Preserving Shape Optimization Using Nonlinear Extension Operators." Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 189, no. 1 (March 9, 2021): 291–316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10957-021-01837-8.
Full textFriedman, Sy D. "Generic Σ31 absoluteness." Journal of Symbolic Logic 69, no. 1 (March 2004): 73–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.2178/jsl/1080938826.
Full textDoebler, Philipp, and Ralf Schindler. "$\Pi_2$ Consequences of $\mathsf{BMM}$ $+$ $NS_{\omega_1}$ is precipitous and the semiproperness of stationary set preserving forcings." Mathematical Research Letters 16, no. 5 (2009): 797–815. http://dx.doi.org/10.4310/mrl.2009.v16.n5.a4.
Full textDhaouadi, Firas, and Michael Dumbser. "A Structure-Preserving Finite Volume Scheme for a Hyperbolic Reformulation of the Navier–Stokes–Korteweg Equations." Mathematics 11, no. 4 (February 9, 2023): 876. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/math11040876.
Full textKaushal, Pauroosh, and Rohini Mudhalwadkar. "Stationary wavelet singular entropy based electronic tongue for classification of milk." Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control 42, no. 4 (January 7, 2020): 870–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0142331219893895.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Stationary set preserving"
Santiago, Suárez Juan Manuel. "Infinitary logics and forcing." Electronic Thesis or Diss., Université Paris Cité, 2024. http://www.theses.fr/2024UNIP7024.
Full textThe main results of this thesis are related to forcing, but our presentation benefits from relating them to another domain of logic: the model theory of infinitary logics. In the 1950s, after the basic framework of first-order model theory had been established, Carol Karp, followed by Makkai, Keisler and Mansfield among others, developed the area of logic known as "infinitary logics". One key idea from our work, which was more or less implicit in the research of many, is that forcing plays a role in infinitary logic similar to the role compactness plays in first-order logic. Specifically, much alike compactness is the key tool to produce models of first-order theories, forcing can be the key tool to produce the interesting models of infinitary theories. The first part of this thesis explores the relationship between infinitary logics and Boolean valued models. Leveraging on the translation of forcing in the Boolean valued models terminology, this part lays the foundations connecting infinitary logics to forcing. A consistency property is a family of sets of non-contradictory sentences closed under certain natural logical operations. Consistency properties are the standard tools to produce models of non-contradictory infinitary sentences. The first major result we establish in the thesis is the Boolean Model Existence Theorem, asserting that any sentence which belongs to some set which is in some consistency property has a Boolean valued model with the mixing property, and strengthens Mansfield's original result. The Boolean Model Existence Theorem allows us to prove three additional results in the model theory of Boolean valued models for the semantics induced by Boolean valued models with the mixing property: a completeness theorem, an interpolation theorem, and an omitting types theorem. These can be shown to be generalizations of the corresponding results for first order logic in view of the fact that a first order sentence has a Tarski model if and only if it has a Boolean valued model. However we believe that the central result of this part of the thesis is the Conservative Compactness Theorem. In pursuit of a generalization of first-order compactness for infinitary logics, we introduce the concepts of conservative strengthening and of finite conservativity. We argue that the appropriate generalization of finite consistency (relative to Tarski semantics for first order logic) is finite conservativity (relative to the semantics given by Boolean valued models). The Conservative Compactness Theorem states that any finitely conservative family of sentences admits a Boolean valued model with the mixing property. In our opinion these results support the claim: Boolean-valued models with the mixing property provide a natural semantics for infinitary logics. In the second part of the thesis we leverage on the results of the first part to address the following question: For what family of infinitary formulae can we force the existence of a Tarski model for them without destroying stationary sets? Kasum and Velickovic introduced a characterization of which sentences can be forced by a stationary set preserving forcing (AS-goodness). Their work builds on the groundbreaking result of Asperò and Schindler. We define the ASK property -a variant of AS-goodness- which we also employ to the same effect of Kasum and Velickovic. It is shown that for any formula with the ASK-property, one can force the existence of a Tarski model in a stationary set preserving way. The proof of this result builds on the model theoretic perspective of forcing presented in the first part of the thesis, and does so introducing a new notion of iterated forcing. This presentation of iterated forcing is strictly intertwined with the Conservative Compactness Theorem, thereby emphasizing again the analogy between the pairs (forcing, infinitary logics) and (compactness, first-order logic)
Doebler, Philipp [Verfasser]. "Stationary set preserving L-forcings and the extender algebra / vorgelegt von Philipp Doebler." 2010. http://d-nb.info/1002926424/34.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Stationary set preserving"
Doraiswamy, L. K. "Catalysis by Solids, 1 : Organic Intermediates and Fine Chemicals." In Organic Synthesis Engineering. Oxford University Press, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195096897.003.0012.
Full text