Academic literature on the topic 'Stakeholder theory'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Stakeholder theory.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Stakeholder theory"
Ryan, Lori Verstegen. "Stakeholder Theory." Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 6 (1995): 279–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/iabsproc1995626.
Full textWindsor, Duane. "Stakeholder Theory." Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 7 (1996): 1219–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/iabsproc19967114.
Full textFreeman, R. Edward. "Stakeholder Theory." Philosophy of Management 8, no. 3 (2009): 97–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/pom20098310.
Full textWindsor, Duane. "Stakeholder Theory." Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 12 (2001): 527–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/iabsproc20011251.
Full textMahajan, Ritika, Weng Marc Lim, Monica Sareen, Satish Kumar, and Rajat Panwar. "Stakeholder theory." Journal of Business Research 166 (November 2023): 114104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114104.
Full textHayibor, Sefa. "Equity Sensitivity and Stakeholder Behaviour." Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 30 (2019): 98–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/iabsproc20193012.
Full textBridoux, Flore, and J. W. Stoelhorst. "Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives." Strategic Management Journal 35, no. 1 (April 26, 2013): 107–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.2089.
Full textElms, Heather, and Shawn Berman. "Stakeholder-Agency Theory." Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 8 (1997): 657–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/iabsproc1997863.
Full textJones, Thomas M., and Andrew C. Wicks. "Convergent Stakeholder Theory." Academy of Management Review 24, no. 2 (April 1999): 206. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/259075.
Full textJones, Thomas M., and Andrew C. Wicks. "Convergent Stakeholder Theory." Academy of Management Review 24, no. 2 (April 1999): 206–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1893929.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Stakeholder theory"
Phillips, Robert. "Stakeholder theory, organizational ethics & a principle of stakeholder fairness." Full text available online (restricted access), 1997. http://images.lib.monash.edu.au/ts/theses/Phillips.pdf.
Full textMansell, Samuel F. "A critique of stakeholder theory." Thesis, University of Essex, 2009. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.502182.
Full textWang, Heli C. "A stakeholder theory of corporate diversification." Connect to resource, 2002. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view.cgi?acc%5Fnum=osu1261316358.
Full textHaataja, David. "Stakeholder Theory : The New Story of Business?" Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Företagsekonomiska institutionen, 2020. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-419510.
Full textTorres, Lucas Hoerlle. "Teoria do Stakeholder : um estudo da aplicação do princípio de equidade do Stakeholder." reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10183/72781.
Full textFor those who believe that ethics and business are separated instances (separation thesis), Freeman et al (2010) argue that it can be together (integration thesis). The authors defend that the stakeholder theory is a way by which it can happen. In the field of stakeholder theory Phillips (2003) proposed the principle of stakeholder fairness which consists in a proposal that aims to guarantee an ethical relationship between organization and its stakeholders. In the present study stakeholder is considered as those groups which have mutual obligations with an organization. This obligations goes beyond those determined by what the society's morality has established. This study aims to comprehend how the principle of stakeholder fairness is, or is not, present in the management of an organization's stakeholders. For this purpose a qualitative explanatory research was done using deep interviews that were also transcript and analyzed by the categorical content analyses technique. It was proposed the following categories: (A) moral, ethics and justice; (B) cooperative scheme; (C) stakeholders: ways or endings? It was comprehended that the principle of stakeholder fairness is present in the relationship between the studied organization and its stakeholders as it was proposed by Phillips (2003). As findings the work brings thoughts about the generic model of the cooperative scheme showing that derivatives stakeholders can be less frequent as they seem to be. It was also realized by the author of the study that ethics, moral and justice are concepts that made confusion on the interviewers. It leads to believe that it's possible that other members of the society also do not have understood this concepts. This way the teaching of this disciplines deserves more attention. At the end, the author of the present dissertation detaches that the use of good sense, honest behavior and also the creation of ties with other individuals are good ways to keep a good relationship with stakeholders. In a way of concluding the study it was made an appeal for more moral consciousness not only for managers but also for the society, aiming a better world for everybody.
Lachapelle, Dominic. "Stakeholder theory contributions to the corporate responsibility debate." Thesis, University of Ottawa (Canada), 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/10393/26684.
Full textGoossens, Victoria. "Power, stakeholders and the theory of planned behaviour : understanding stakeholder engagement in an English seaside context." Thesis, University of Hull, 2011. http://hydra.hull.ac.uk/resources/hull:5770.
Full textHerold, David Martin. "Demystifying the link between institutional theory and stakeholder theory in sustainability reporting." SciView.Net, 2018. http://epub.wu.ac.at/6727/1/Herold_JEMS.pdf.
Full textIslam, Mohammad Shahidul, and Sentayehu Tura. "Exploring the difference between Agile and Lean:A stakeholder perspective." Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Informationssystem, 2013. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-202724.
Full textPINTO, MARIO COUTO SOARES. "ECONOMY OF COMMUNION UNDER THE FRAMEWORK OF STAKEHOLDER THEORY." PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO DE JANEIRO, 2004. http://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/Busca_etds.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=5774@1.
Full textEsta pesquisa analisou características de quatro empresas brasileira, vinculadas ao Projeto de Economia de Comunhão - EdC, buscando comparar seu comportamento com as orientações da Teoria dos Stakeholders. Além disso, foi feita uma comparação de indicadores sociais destas empresas, tomando por base o conjunto oferecido pelo Instituto Brasileiro de Análises Sociais e Econômicas - IBASE, com as empresas constantes no Baco de dados desta instituição, buscando compreender como se dá sua performance em termos de responsabilidade social corporativa. A metodologia utilizada foi o estudo de caso múltiplo, o que permitiu incluir tanto uma abordagem qualitativa, no caso fortemente apoiado em entrevistas, quanto quantitativas. A intenção declarada desta investigação é a de avaliar se as quatro empresas que formam o núcleo da pesquisa têm aumentado seu desempenho competitivo por conta das características inerentes à Economia de Comunhão. O trabalho conclui com o estabelecimento de um conceito de Economia de Comunhão, que esteja de acordo com as orientações da Teoria dos Stakeholders. Para que este objetivo fosse alcançado, foram realizadas visitas a dois Congressos Nacionais sobre o tema, no local onde ocorreu o lançamento mundial do projeto EdC, em Cotia , São Paulo, e foram realizadas visitas às quatro empresas, com o intuito de entrevistar stakeholders internos e externos. Além das entrevistas pessoais, foi realizada uma survey exploratória com todas as noventa empresas filiadas ao projeto no Brasil, e foram mantidos contactos telefônicos e por meio eletrônico com órgãos de classe e o escritório central do Movimento das Focolares, organização da qual a EdC se originou. O trabalho conclui que há grande semelhança entre as características observadas nas quatro empresas visitadas e as propostas da Teoria dos Stakeholders, sem haver, contudo, uma sobreposição perfeita. Quanto à vantagem competitiva, foram identificadas fontes seguras que a estimulam, as quais são de difícil reprodução fora do contexto da EdC. No que se refere ao desempenho no campo social, alguns indicadores mostram-se bastante desenvolvidos, mesmo levando-se em consideração o pequeno porte das empresas consideradas.
This research analised the characteristics of four brazilian companies, that belongs to Communion Economy Project - EdC, trying to compare their behaviour as a whole with the guidances of Stakeholder Theory. Besides, another comparison has been made among the social scorecards of these companies, using the framework of Instituto Brasileiro de Análises Sociais e Econômicas -IBASE, and the companies that belong to the data base of this organization. By doing that, this paper tried to find out how stands the performance of these four companies, in terms of the corporation social responsability. The main goal of this investigation is to estimate whether or not the four companies, that build up the core or the research, have improved their competitiveness due to EdC distinctive characteristics. The research concluded by creating a concept of Economy of Communion enterprise, giving the companies a road map that allows them to keep closer to the Stakeholders Theory guidelines. To reach such goals, was necessary to take part in two annual National EdC Meeting, that took place at Mariápolis Ginetta, in Cotia, São Paulo, the same place in which the EdC`s project has been released to the world. After that, the four companies has been visited, so that it could be possible to make interviews with some internal and external stakeholders. Besides, several contacts has been made by phone and by eletronic mail with unions and other representatives, and a exploratory survey has been launched in order to reach all ninety EdC companies in Brazil. The research concludes that there is a great similarity between the characteristics of the four visited companies and the Theory of Stakeholdes proposals, although they do not fit perfectly. Mentioning the competitive advantage, it has been recognized that there is, indeed, a great source of it by following the EdC framework, although it is pretty hard to reproduce the same behaviour outside it. In relation with the social performance, the research has noticed that some of them are much better than the IBASE average, even in comparison with big companies.
Books on the topic "Stakeholder theory"
Bonnafous-Boucher, Maria, and Yvon Pesqueux, eds. Stakeholder Theory. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230524224.
Full textBonnafous-Boucher, Maria, and Jacob Dahl Rendtorff. Stakeholder Theory. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44356-0.
Full textMenghwar, Prem, R. Edward Freeman, and Lakshmi Nair. Stakeholder Theory. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781071907405.
Full textMaria, Bonnafous-Boucher, and Pesqueux Yvon, eds. Stakeholder theory: A European perspective. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
Find full textStakeholder theory: Impact and prospects. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2011.
Find full textSusanne, Stoll-Kleemann, and Welp Martin, eds. Stakeholder dialogues in natural resources management: Theory and practice. Berlin: Springer, 2006.
Find full textCorporate Stakeholder Conference (1992 University of Toronto). The corporate stakeholder debate: The classical theory and its critics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1993.
Find full textOntario Centre for International Business. International Business & Trade Law Programme., University of Toronto. Faculty of Law., Osgoode Hall Law School, Labor Law Group (U.S.), and Labour Law Casebook Group, eds. The Corporate stakeholder debate: The classical theory and its critics. Toronto, Ont: Ontario Centre for international business, International Business & Trade Law Programme, 1992.
Find full textMarie, Logsdon Jeanne, Wood Donna J. 1949-, Benson Lee E, Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, and Clarkson Centre for Business Ethics., eds. Research in stakeholder theory, 1997-1998: The Sloan Foundation minigrant project. Toronto: Clarkson Centre for Business Ethics, Joseph L. Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, 2000.
Find full textDmytriyev, Sergiy D., and R. Edward Freeman, eds. R. Edward Freeman’s Selected Works on Stakeholder Theory and Business Ethics. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04564-6.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Stakeholder theory"
Gunawan, Juniati. "Stakeholder Theory." In Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management, 3127–32. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25984-5_24.
Full textGunawan, Juniati. "Stakeholder Theory." In Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management, 1–6. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02006-4_24-1.
Full textJonek-Kowalska, Izabela, Radosław Wolniak, Oksana A. Marinina, and Tatyana V. Ponomarenko. "Stakeholder theory." In Stakeholders, Sustainable Development Policies and the Coal Mining Industry, 26–45. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003091110-4.
Full textKivits, Robbert, and Sukanlaya Sawang. "Stakeholder Theory." In Contributions to Management Science, 1–8. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70428-5_1.
Full textBonnafous-Boucher, Maria, and Jacob Dahl Rendtorff. "Stakeholder Theory as a Theory of Organizations." In Stakeholder Theory, 41–51. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44356-0_3.
Full textBonnafous-Boucher, Maria, and Jacob Dahl Rendtorff. "From “The Stakeholder” to Stakeholder Theory." In Stakeholder Theory, 1–20. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44356-0_1.
Full textBonnafous-Boucher, Maria, and Jacob Dahl Rendtorff. "Stakeholder Theory in Strategic Management." In Stakeholder Theory, 21–39. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44356-0_2.
Full textBonnafous-Boucher, Maria, and Jacob Dahl Rendtorff. "Political Philosophy Interpellated by Stakeholder Theory." In Stakeholder Theory, 53–65. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44356-0_4.
Full textBonnafous-Boucher, Maria, and Jacob Dahl Rendtorff. "Stakeholder Theory and Ethics." In Stakeholder Theory, 67–78. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44356-0_5.
Full textBonnafous-Boucher, Maria. "From Government to Governance." In Stakeholder Theory, 1–23. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230524224_1.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Stakeholder theory"
Zhang, Yanru. "The Analysis of Shareholder Theory and Stakeholder Theory." In 2011 Fourth International Conference on Business Intelligence and Financial Engineering (BIFE). IEEE, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/bife.2011.117.
Full textPower, Ken. "Stakeholder theory and agile software development." In the 11th International Conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1961258.1961280.
Full textChen, Yu-lei, and You-gen Li. "Matching relationship among corporate lifecycles theory, stakeholder theory and CSR." In 2012 First National Conference for Engineering Sciences (FNCES). IEEE, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/nces.2012.6543468.
Full text"Stakeholder Theory, Intellectual Capital and Risk Sharing: Proposed Framework." In 20th European Conference on Knowledge Management. ACPI, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.34190/km.19.263.
Full textMa, Ning F., Chien Wen Yuan, Moojan Ghafurian, and Benjamin V. Hanrahan. "Using Stakeholder Theory to Examine Drivers' Stake in Uber." In CHI '18: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173657.
Full textHa-Brookshire, Jung E., Sojin Jung, and Stacy Lee. "A Framework of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility Gaps between Internal and External Stakeholders: A Stakeholder Theory Approach." In Pivoting for the Pandemic. Iowa State University Digital Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/itaa.12191.
Full text"Storyboard Augmentation of Process Model Grammars for Stakeholder Communication." In International Conference on Information Visualization Theory and Applications. SCITEPRESS - Science and and Technology Publications, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0004668101140121.
Full textTung, Aaron. "A Value Focused Thinking Approach to Decommissioning Decision Making." In SPE Symposium: Decommissioning and Abandonment. SPE, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/208471-ms.
Full textLi, Yan. "Influencing Factors of Outstanding Teachers Training Based on Stakeholder Theory." In 2020 International Conference on Modern Education and Information Management (ICMEIM). IEEE, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icmeim51375.2020.00082.
Full textHickman, Louis, and Mesut Akdere. "Stakeholder Theory: Implications for Total Quality Management in Higher Education." In Fourth International Conference on Lean Six Sigma for Higher Education. Purdue Scholarly Publishing Services, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.5703/1288284316381.
Full textReports on the topic "Stakeholder theory"
Clark-Wilson, Alison, Shakil Ahmed, Tom Kaye, and Asma Zubairi. A Theory of Change for Teachers towards a Technology-Enhanced Education System in Bangladesh. EdTech Hub, March 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.53832/edtechhub.0088.
Full textClark-Wilson, Alison, Shakil Ahmed, Tom Kaye, and Asma Zubairi. A Theory of Change for Teachers towards a Technology-Enhanced Education System in Bangladesh. EdTech Hub, March 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.53832/edtechhub.0088.
Full textUnterhitzenberger, Christine. Stakeholder challenge: Dealing with difficult stakeholders. Association for Project Management, February 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.61175/pkjw9157.
Full textLemanski, Ursula, and Donna Vogler. Stakeholder Analysis. American Museum of Natural History, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.5531/cbc.ncep.0029.
Full textOliver, Sandy, Laurenz Langer, Promise Nduku, Hayley Umayam, Kate Conroy, Charlotte Maugham, Tamsin Bradley, Mukdarut Bangpan, Dylan Kneale, and Chris Roche. Engaging stakeholders with evidence and uncertainty: developing a toolkit. Centre of Excellence for Development Impact and Learning (CEDIL), September 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.51744/cmwp4.
Full textRuzante, Juliana M., Ellen Thomas Shumaker, Sidney Holt, Susan Mayer, Adam Kokotovich, Maude Cuchiara, Andrew R. Binder, Jennifer Kuzma, and Khara Grieger. Eliciting Stakeholder Perceptions Using a Novel Online Engagement Platform: A Case Study on Nano-Agrifoods. RTI Press, January 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.3768/rtipress.2022.op.0071.2201.
Full textClark, Louise, and Ed Small. ALRE Stakeholder Survey Analysis. Institute of Development Studies (IDS), November 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/apra.2020.013.
Full textOliver, Sandy, Chris Roche, Ruth Stewart, Mukdarut Bangpan, Kelly Dickson, Kirrily Pells, Nancy Cartwright, James Hargreaves, and David Gough. Stakeholder Engagement for Development Impact Evaluation and Evidence Synthesis. Centre for Excellence and Development Impact and Learning (CEDIL), September 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.51744/cip3.
Full textWylie, Cathy. Highest Needs Review: What matters to stakeholders. NZCER, November 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.18296/rep.0026.
Full textMaron, Nancy, and Peter Potter. TOME Stakeholder Value Assessment: Final Report. Association of American Universities, Association of Research Libraries, and Association of University Presses, August 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.29242/report.tome2023.
Full text