Academic literature on the topic 'Stakeholder'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Stakeholder.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Stakeholder"
Mitchell, Ronald K., Harry J. Van Buren, Michelle Greenwood, and R. Edward Freeman. "Stakeholder Inclusion and Accounting for Stakeholders." Journal of Management Studies 52, no. 7 (October 1, 2015): 851–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joms.12151.
Full textMackie, Thomas I., Radley C. Sheldrick, Sarah D. de Ferranti, Tully Saunders, Erick G. Rojas, and Laurel K. Leslie. "Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Stakeholder-engaged Research (SER)." Medical Care 55, no. 1 (January 2017): 19–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0000000000000593.
Full textAmadi, Chika, Patricia Carrillo, and Martin Tuuli. "Stakeholder management in PPP projects: external stakeholders’ perspective." Built Environment Project and Asset Management 8, no. 4 (September 10, 2018): 403–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/bepam-02-2018-0048.
Full textPutro, Heru Purboyo Hidayat, Pradono Pradono, and Titus Hari Setiawan. "Development of Multi-Actor Multi-Criteria Analysis Based on the Weight of Stakeholder Involvement in the Assessment of Natural–Cultural Tourism Area Transportation Policies." Algorithms 14, no. 7 (July 20, 2021): 217. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/a14070217.
Full textAK, Al Sheyadi. "Stakeholder Environmental Concerns and Adoption of Green SCM Practices: Role of Stakeholder Characteristics." Open Access Journal of Waste Management & Xenobiotics 5, no. 4 (October 19, 2022): 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.23880/oajwx-16000177.
Full textHayibor, Sefa. "Equity Sensitivity and Stakeholder Behaviour." Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 30 (2019): 98–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/iabsproc20193012.
Full textCharan, V., and Sindhu Vaardini. "Investigation of Current Practices and Challenges of Stakeholder Management Process in Construction Projects." INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT 08, no. 03 (March 1, 2024): 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.55041/ijsrem28988.
Full textSpitzeck, Heiko, and Erik G. Hansen. "Stakeholder governance: how stakeholders influence corporate decision making." Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society 10, no. 4 (August 11, 2010): 378–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14720701011069623.
Full textFosse, Sébastien M., and Carl J. Kock. "Meta-Stakeholders: How Social Investors Shape Stakeholder Orientation." Academy of Management Proceedings 2014, no. 1 (January 2014): 11743. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2014.11743abstract.
Full textBrunner, Norbert, Sukanya Das, Anju Singh, and Markus Starkl. "Decentralized Wastewater Management in India: Stakeholder Views on Best Available Technologies and Resource Recovery." Water 15, no. 21 (October 25, 2023): 3719. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w15213719.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Stakeholder"
McCandless, Kaisa M. "Beyond the stakeholder paradox : to meaningful consultation with community stakeholders." Thesis, McGill University, 2002. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=79788.
Full textAn analysis of practice guidelines, protocols and key informant interviews using a critical organizational communication approach evaluates the extent to which contemporary instances of consultation practice account for the specificity of stakeholder context, address power and capacity gaps between consulting organizations, and enables all stakeholders to engage in a negotiative dialogue that has a direct influence upon the decision-making process of a project. This thesis argues that operationalizing tenets of a critical communication framework within consultation practice has the potential to produce the conditions for conducting a meaningful consultation with community stakeholders.
Waritimi, Ekpobomene. "Stakeholder management in practice : evidence from the Nigerian oil and gas industry." Thesis, Durham University, 2012. http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/3558/.
Full textTorres, Lucas Hoerlle. "Teoria do Stakeholder : um estudo da aplicação do princípio de equidade do Stakeholder." reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10183/72781.
Full textFor those who believe that ethics and business are separated instances (separation thesis), Freeman et al (2010) argue that it can be together (integration thesis). The authors defend that the stakeholder theory is a way by which it can happen. In the field of stakeholder theory Phillips (2003) proposed the principle of stakeholder fairness which consists in a proposal that aims to guarantee an ethical relationship between organization and its stakeholders. In the present study stakeholder is considered as those groups which have mutual obligations with an organization. This obligations goes beyond those determined by what the society's morality has established. This study aims to comprehend how the principle of stakeholder fairness is, or is not, present in the management of an organization's stakeholders. For this purpose a qualitative explanatory research was done using deep interviews that were also transcript and analyzed by the categorical content analyses technique. It was proposed the following categories: (A) moral, ethics and justice; (B) cooperative scheme; (C) stakeholders: ways or endings? It was comprehended that the principle of stakeholder fairness is present in the relationship between the studied organization and its stakeholders as it was proposed by Phillips (2003). As findings the work brings thoughts about the generic model of the cooperative scheme showing that derivatives stakeholders can be less frequent as they seem to be. It was also realized by the author of the study that ethics, moral and justice are concepts that made confusion on the interviewers. It leads to believe that it's possible that other members of the society also do not have understood this concepts. This way the teaching of this disciplines deserves more attention. At the end, the author of the present dissertation detaches that the use of good sense, honest behavior and also the creation of ties with other individuals are good ways to keep a good relationship with stakeholders. In a way of concluding the study it was made an appeal for more moral consciousness not only for managers but also for the society, aiming a better world for everybody.
Beach, Sandra. "Stakeholder engagement by governance networks : a study of stakeholder engagement by road delivery network in Queensland." Thesis, Queensland University of Technology, 2013. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/60669/1/Sandra_Beach_Thesis.pdf.
Full textJohnson, Clair Marie. "Power and Participation: Relationships among Evaluator Identities, Evaluation Models, and Stakeholder Involvement." Thesis, Boston College, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:104710.
Full textStakeholder involvement is widely acknowledged to be an important aspect of program evaluation (Mertens, 2007; Greene, 2005a; Brandon, 1998). However, limited work has been done to empirically study evaluators’ practices of stakeholder involvement and ways in which stakeholder involvement is affected or guided by various factors. As evaluators interact with and place value on the input of stakeholders, social, cultural, and historical backgrounds will always be infused into the context (Mertens & Wilson, 2012; MacNeil, 2005). The field of evaluation has done little to critically examine how such contexts impact evaluators’ perceptions of stakeholders and their involvement. The present study attempts to fill these gaps, focusing specifically on the relationships among evaluator identities and characteristics, evaluation models, and stakeholder involvement. Using the frameworks of critical evaluation theory (Freeman & Vasconcelos, 2010) and a theory of capital (Bourdieu, 1986), the present study utilized a sequential explanatory mixed methods approach. A sample of 272 practicing program evaluators from the United States and Canada provided quantitative survey data, while a sample of nine evaluators provided focus group and interview data. Regression analyses and thematic content analyses were conducted. Findings from the quantitative strand included relationships between: (1) measures of individualism-collectivism and stakeholder involvement outcomes, (2) contextual evaluation variables and stakeholder involvement outcomes, (3) use of use, values or social justice branch evaluation models and stakeholder involvement outcomes, and (4) whether the evaluator identified as a person of color and the diversity of involved stakeholders. Findings from the qualitative strand demonstrated the role of dominant frameworks of evaluation serving to perpetuate systems of power. Participating evaluators revealed ways in which they feel and experience systems of power acting on them, including participation in, recognition of, and responses to oppression. The qualitative strand showed that evaluation models may be used to help recognize power dynamics, but that they are also used to reinforce existing power dynamics. Implications and recommended directions for future research are discussed
Thesis (PhD) — Boston College, 2015
Submitted to: Boston College. Lynch School of Education
Discipline: Educational Research, Measurement and Evaluation
Bothén, Niklas, Erik Brantås, and Carl Johan Stening. "Who Matters?! : External stakeholder analysis in projects." Thesis, Uppsala University, Department of Business Studies, 2010. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-127099.
Full textStakeholder management is a topic that has received increased attention in later years. Researchers have tried to answer the question of which stakeholders that really matters to organizations and developed ways for identifying and prioritizing among stakeholders. This thesis fills a void in academia by looking exclusively on external stakeholders in large and complex projects such as the construction of power plants. The thesis investigates the approach towards external stakeholders as well as the process of identifying and prioritizing external stakeholders in this specific setting. By using attributes identified in earlier research, a theoretical framework was created that was used to investigate two of Sweden’s largest companies through a qualitative case study. The thesis describe how stakeholder identification and prioritization occurs in the different case companies and ultimately contribute with a new model that can be used by managers to prioritize among external stakeholder in organizational projects.
Durelius, Hugo. "Att avgöra vilka stakeholders som spelar roll i småbolag : Ett bidrag till forskningen om stakeholder salience." Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Företagsekonomiska institutionen, 2019. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-389633.
Full textPhillips, Robert. "Stakeholder theory, organizational ethics & a principle of stakeholder fairness." Full text available online (restricted access), 1997. http://images.lib.monash.edu.au/ts/theses/Phillips.pdf.
Full textLeblanc, Richard W. J. "The stakeholder debate." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1997. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp04/mq22860.pdf.
Full textDorigo, Lorenzo <1978>. "Social enterprise and stakeholder governance : a comparison of the CSR performance in single-stakeholder and multi-stakeholder structures." Doctoral thesis, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/10579/1037.
Full textIn un periodo di profonda ristrutturazione dei sistemi nazionali di welfare, le imprese sociali hanno ricevuto una progressiva attenzione da parte di professionisti, amministratori pubblici e studiosi per il loro ruolo di agenti del cambiamento sociale nell’erogazione di servizi alla persona e nella promozione di iniziative imprenditoriali volte allo sviluppo sostenibile delle comunità locali. In quanto organizzazioni di economia sociale con finalità di interesse generale, esse si distinguono maggiormente dalle altre organizzazioni di terzo settore per praticare il coinvolgimento di utenti e stakeholder locali nei processi produttivi e decisionali d’impresa allo scopo di bilanciare molteplici obiettivi istituzionali. L’obiettivo della dissertazione è triplice. I primi due capitoli esaminano e confrontano le principali definizioni e significati del termine ‘impresa sociale’ così come emersi dalla letteratura professionale ed accademica Statunitense, Europeo-Continentale e Britannica degli ultimi anni. Il terzo e il quarto capitolo mirano a fornire un quadro di analisi organizzativa utile a rilevare i vantaggi dello stakeholder management nelle imprese sociali, prestando particolare attenzione al ruolo svolto dalle strutture di governo multi-stakeholder. Infine, l’ultimo capitolo presenta, descrive ed analizza i risultati di uno studio comparato sulla responsabilità sociale di soci lavoratori in imprese sociali con strutture organizzative single-stakeholder e multi-stakeholder, allo scopo di mettere in evidenza eventuali relazioni positive intercorrenti tra strutture di governance multi-stakeholder e responsabilità sociale d’impresa.
Books on the topic "Stakeholder"
Bonnafous-Boucher, Maria, and Yvon Pesqueux, eds. Stakeholder Theory. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230524224.
Full textRatten, Vanessa, and Vitor Braga, eds. Stakeholder Entrepreneurship. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7091-6.
Full textBonnafous-Boucher, Maria, and Jacob Dahl Rendtorff. Stakeholder Theory. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44356-0.
Full textFranklin, Aimee L. Stakeholder Engagement. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47519-2.
Full textMenghwar, Prem, R. Edward Freeman, and Lakshmi Nair. Stakeholder Theory. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781071907405.
Full textLtd, Mintel International Group, ed. Stakeholder pensions. London: Mintel International, 2000.
Find full text1970-, Kelly Gavin, Kelly Dominic 1965-, and Gamble Andrew, eds. Stakeholder capitalism. Houndmills, Basingstoke [England]: Macmillan Press, 1997.
Find full textEYSIP. Stakeholder review. Edinburgh: EYSIP, 2003.
Find full textPricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Stakeholder consultation. S.l.]: The Company, 1998.
Find full textWheeler, David. The stakeholder corporation: A blueprint for maximizing stakeholder value. London: Pitman, 1997.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Stakeholder"
Heinen, Andreas. "Stakeholder." In Wer will das noch hören?, 139–44. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-00303-6_11.
Full textRussell-Walling, Edward. "Stakeholder." In 50 Schlüsselideen Management, 160–63. Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8274-2637-6_41.
Full textElms, Heather, and R. A. Phillips. "Stakeholder." In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management, 1592–93. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-00772-8_270.
Full textKrkač, Kristijan. "Stakeholder." In Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management, 3096–99. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25984-5_371.
Full textElms, Heather, and R. A. Phillips. "Stakeholder." In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management, 1–2. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_270-1.
Full textKrkač, Kristijan. "Stakeholder." In Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management, 1–4. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02006-4_371-1.
Full textMarzuki, Azizan, and Iain Hay. "Stakeholder." In Encyclopedia of Tourism, 896–98. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01384-8_389.
Full textWieland, Josef. "Stakeholder Resources and Stakeholder Interests." In Relational Economics and Organization Governance, 69–83. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45112-7_6.
Full textBonnafous-Boucher, Maria, and Jacob Dahl Rendtorff. "From “The Stakeholder” to Stakeholder Theory." In Stakeholder Theory, 1–20. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44356-0_1.
Full textRatten, Vanessa. "Stakeholder Innovation." In Stakeholder Entrepreneurship, 71–81. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7091-6_6.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Stakeholder"
Mints, Aleksey, and Evelina Kamyshnykova. "Methods of stakeholder prioritisation in the context of stakeholder management." In Contemporary Issues in Business, Management and Economics Engineering. Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/cibmee.2019.046.
Full textKumalasari, Klara, Sujarwoto, and I. Gede Eko Putra Sri Sentanu. "Stakeholder Collaboration." In 3rd Annual International Conference on Public and Business Administration (AICoBPA 2020). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.210928.093.
Full textYoo, Daisy. "Stakeholder Tokens." In DIS '17: Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2017. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3064857.3079161.
Full textVerner, June, Sarah Beecham, and Narciso Cerpa. "Stakeholder dissonance." In the 2010 Special Interest Group on Management Information System's 48th annual conference on Computer personnel research. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1796900.1796918.
Full textNussbaumer, Martin, Patrick Freudenstein, and Martin Gaedke. "Stakeholder collaboration." In the 6th international conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1145581.1145608.
Full textChou, Suzanne, Mojtaba Arezoomand, Marianna J. Coulentianos, Kowit Nambunmee, Richard Neitzel, Achyuta Adhvaryu, and Jesse Austin-Breneman. "The Stakeholder Agreement Metric (SAM): Quantifying Preference Agreement Between Product Stakeholders." In ASME 2020 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc2020-22138.
Full text"Emergent Stakeholder Competence." In 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2009.182.
Full textHelf, Christopher, Patrick Zwickl, Helmut Hlavacs, and Peter Reichl. "mHealth Stakeholder Integration." In MoMM 2015: The 13th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multimedia. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2837126.2837153.
Full textZheng, Yong. "Multi-stakeholder recommendations." In RecSys '19: Thirteenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3298689.3346951.
Full textArnowitz, Jonathan, Monica Heidelberg, Diana Gray, Michael Arent, and Naomi Dorsch. "The stakeholder forest." In CHI '05 extended abstracts. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1056808.1056810.
Full textReports on the topic "Stakeholder"
Unterhitzenberger, Christine. Stakeholder challenge: Dealing with difficult stakeholders. Association for Project Management, February 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.61175/pkjw9157.
Full textTanner, Tanner,, and Carl Emmerson. Stakeholder pensions. Institute for Fiscal Studies, October 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1920/bn.ifs.1999.0001.
Full textLemanski, Ursula, and Donna Vogler. Stakeholder Analysis. American Museum of Natural History, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.5531/cbc.ncep.0029.
Full textFerreira, Miguel. D2.1—Baseline Study of Stakeholder & Stakeholder Initiatives. Collaboration to Clarify the Costs of Curation, July 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.7207/4c-2.1.
Full textFerreira, Miguel. D2.1—Baseline Study of Stakeholder & Stakeholder Revision 1. Collaboration to Clarify the Costs of Curation, June 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.7207/4c-2.1.1.
Full textClark, Louise, and Ed Small. ALRE Stakeholder Survey Analysis. Institute of Development Studies (IDS), November 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/apra.2020.013.
Full textKvam, Reidar. Meaningful Stakeholder Consultation (Summary Brochure) . Inter-American Development Bank, October 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0000871.
Full textAlmazan, Andres, Javier Suarez, and Sheridan Titman. Stakeholder, Transparency and Capital Structure. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, November 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w10101.
Full textLapsa, Melissa Voss, Tyler Grubbs, and Gannate Khowailed. ORNL's envelope stakeholder workshop proceedings. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), September 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1214023.
Full textPeterson, T. Stakeholder acceptance analysis ResonantSonic drilling. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), December 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/197854.
Full text