Journal articles: 'Speech perception'

1

Boothroyd, Arthur. "Speech perception." Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery 2 (April 1994): 186–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00020840-199404000-00016.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Poeppel, David, and Philip J. Monahan. "Speech Perception." Current Directions in Psychological Science 17, no. 2 (April 2008): 80–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00553.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Samuel, Arthur G. "Speech Perception." Annual Review of Psychology 62, no. 1 (January 10, 2011): 49–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131643.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Diehl, Randy L., Andrew J. Lotto, and Lori L. Holt. "Speech Perception." Annual Review of Psychology 55, no. 1 (February 2004): 149–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142028.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Kuhl, Patricia K. "Speech perception." Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 94, no. 3 (September 1993): 1767. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.408025.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Beechey, Timothy. "Is speech perception what speech perception tests test?" Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 149, no. 4 (April 2021): A33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/10.0004441.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Aldholmi, Yahya, and Hanyong Park. "Perception of speech rate in speech rate perception." Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 140, no. 4 (October 2016): 3333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4970623.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Taneja, MK. "Visual speech perception." Indian Journal of Otology 25, no. 2 (2019): 49. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/indianjotol.indianjotol_67_19.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Ohora, Yasunori, and Koichi Miyashiba. "Speech perception apparatus." Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 98, no. 1 (July 1995): 31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.414359.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Sams, M. "Audiovisual Speech Perception." Perception 26, no. 1_suppl (August 1997): 347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/v970029.

Full text

Abstract:

Persons with hearing loss use visual information from articulation to improve their speech perception. Even persons with normal hearing utilise visual information, especially when the stimulus-to-noise ratio is poor. A dramatic demonstration of the role of vision in speech perception is the audiovisual fusion called the ‘McGurk effect’. When the auditory syllable /pa/ is presented in synchrony with the face articulating the syllable /ka/, the subject usually perceives /ta/ or /ka/. The illusory perception is clearly auditory in nature. We recently studied the audiovisual fusion (acoustical /p/, visual /k/) for Finnish (1) syllables, and (2) words. Only 3% of the subjects perceived the syllables according to the acoustical input, ie in 97% of the subjects the perception was influenced by the visual information. For words the percentage of acoustical identifications was 10%. The results demonstrate a very strong influence of visual information of articulation in face-to-face speech perception. Word meaning and sentence context have a negligible influence on the fusion. We have also recorded neuromagnetic responses of the human cortex when the subjects both heard and saw speech. Some subjects showed a distinct response to a ‘McGurk’ stimulus. The response was rather late, emerging about 200 ms from the onset of the auditory stimulus. We suggest that the perisylvian cortex, close to the source area for the auditory 100 ms response (M100), may be activated by the discordant stimuli. The behavioural and neuromagnetic results suggest a precognitive audiovisual speech integration occurring at a relatively early processing level.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Sheffield, Benjamin M., Gerald Schuchman, and Joshua G. W. Bernstein. "Trimodal Speech Perception." Ear and Hearing 36, no. 3 (2015): e99-e112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000000131.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Scott, Mark. "Speech imagery recalibrates speech-perception boundaries." Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 78, no. 5 (April 11, 2016): 1496–511. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1087-6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Schouten, Bert. "The nature of speech perception (The psychophysics of speech perception III)." Speech Communication 41, no. 1 (August 2003): 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0167-6393(02)00088-2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Bayard, Clémence, Laura Machart, Antje Strauß, Silvain Gerber, Vincent Aubanel, and Jean-Luc Schwartz. "Cued Speech Enhances Speech-in-Noise Perception." Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 24, no. 3 (February 27, 2019): 223–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enz003.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Başkent, Deniz, and Etienne Gaudrain. "Musician advantage for speech-on-speech perception." Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 139, no. 3 (March 2016): EL51—EL56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4942628.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Johnson, Keith. "Speech Physiology, Speech Perception, and Acoustic Phonetics." Journal of Phonetics 20, no. 1 (January 1992): 172–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0095-4470(19)30246-3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Meister, H. "Speech audiometry, speech perception, and cognitive functions." HNO 65, S1 (September 30, 2016): 1–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00106-016-0250-7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Holt, L. L., and A. J. Lotto. "Speech perception as categorization." Attention, Perception & Psychophysics 72, no. 5 (June 30, 2010): 1218–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/app.72.5.1218.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

CAO, Yi, and Xiaohu YANG. "Speech perception in schizophrenia." Advances in Psychological Science 27, no. 6 (2019): 1025. http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1042.2019.01025.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Bernstein, Lynne E., Paula E. Tucker, and Marilyn E. Demorest. "Speech perception without hearing." Perception & Psychophysics 62, no. 2 (January 2000): 233–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/bf03205546.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

KAKEHI, Kazuhiko. "MODELS OF SPEECH PERCEPTION." Kodo Keiryogaku (The Japanese Journal of Behaviormetrics) 22, no. 1 (1995): 30–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.2333/jbhmk.22.30.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Bernstein, Lynne E., and Marilyn E. Demorest. "Speech perception without audition." Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 94, no. 3 (September 1993): 1887. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.407521.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Carré, René, and Pierre L. Divenyi. "Perception of speech gestures." Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 103, no. 5 (May 1998): 2979–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.422430.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Fitch, R. Holly, Steve Miller, and Paula Tallal. "NEUROBIOLOGY OF SPEECH PERCEPTION." Annual Review of Neuroscience 20, no. 1 (March 1997): 331–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.20.1.331.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Meng, Qinglin. "Perception of atomic speech." Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 148, no. 4 (October 2020): 2722. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.5147552.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Lenhardt, M., R. Skellett, P. Wang, and A. Clarke. "Human ultrasonic speech perception." Science 253, no. 5015 (July 5, 1991): 82–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.2063208.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Nishinuma, Yukihiro. "Tonal Perception in Speech." Journal of Phonetics 20, no. 2 (April 1992): 279–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0095-4470(19)30629-1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Hayashi, Akiko. "Development of Speech Perception." Japan Journal of Logopedics and Phoniatrics 46, no. 2 (2005): 145–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.5112/jjlp.46.145.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Walker, Abby, Jennifer Hay, Katie Drager, and Kauyumari Sanchez. "Divergence in speech perception." Linguistics 56, no. 1 (January 26, 2018): 257–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0036.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract This paper presents results from an experiment designed to test whether New Zealand listeners’ perceptual adaptation towards Australian English is mediated by their attitudes toward Australia, which we attempted to manipulate experimentally. Participants were put into one of three conditions, where they either read good facts about Australia, bad facts about Australia, or no facts about Australia (the control). Participants performed the same listening task – matching the vowel in a sentence to a vowel in a synthesized continuum – before and after reading the facts. The results indicate that participants who read the bad facts shifted their perception of kit to more Australian-like tokens relative to the control group, while the participants who read good facts shifted their perception of kit to more NZ-like tokens relative to the control group. This result shows that perceptual adaptation towards a dialect can occur in the absence of a speaker of that dialect and that these adaptations are subject to a listener’s (manipulated) affect towards the primed dialect region.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Kiefte, Michael. "Formants in speech perception." Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 140, no. 4 (October 2016): 3162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4969927.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Povel, D. J. "Auditory perception and speech." Acta Psychologica 75, no. 2 (November 1990): 176–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(90)90091-s.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Casserly, Elizabeth D., and David B. Pisoni. "Speech perception and production." Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 1, no. 5 (August 2, 2010): 629–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcs.63.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Whalen, D., and A. Liberman. "Speech perception takes precedence over nonspeech perception." Science 237, no. 4811 (July 10, 1987): 169–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.3603014.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Maili, Sjafty Nursitti NP, and Endang Sondari. "STUDENT PERCEPTIONS ON PARTS OF SPEECH AFTER TAKING INTEGRATED ENGLISH." JURNAL BASIS 9, no. 2 (October 22, 2022): 339–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.33884/basisupb.v9i2.6349.

Full text

Abstract:

This article discussed about perception students on parts of speech after taking Integrated English. The purpose of this research is to know the student’s perception about Parts of Speech such as noun, pronoun, verbs, adjective, adverb, preposition, conjunction and interjection. Problems is students still confuse to put words of parts of speech in a sentence, so the researcher wanted to know what is students’ perceptions on Parts of Speech after taking Integrated English. The method of this study is qualitative research which data was obtained with taking a note from WhatsApp. Michael Patton and Michael Cohran (2002,3) in Sihatul, M (2020) Qualitative research is characteristic by it is aim, which relate to understanding some aspects of social life, and it is methods which (in general) generate words, rather that numbers, as data for analysis. Based on the result of the research, the researchers found the students perception on the parts of speech; First, from ten students as taken data only five students got felt difficult to learn Parts of speech; Second, the students’ perception about Parts of Speech are Positive.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Scott, Mark, H. Henny Yeung, Bryan Gick, and Janet F. Werker. "Inner speech captures the perception of external speech." Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133, no. 4 (April 2013): EL286—EL292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4794932.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Johnson, Keith, and James V. Ralston. "Automaticity in Speech Perception: Some Speech/Nonspeech Comparisons." Phonetica 51, no. 4 (1994): 195–209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000261975.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Haeil Park. "Neural Evidence for Speech Perception Mirroring Speech Production." Korean Journal of Linguistics 38, no. 2 (June 2013): 327–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.18855/lisoko.2013.38.2.006.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Bachan, Jolanta, and Dafydd Gibbon. "Close Copy Speech Synthesis for Speech Perception Testing." Investigationes Linguisticae 13 (June 15, 2006): 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/il.2006.13.2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Perrone-Bertolotti, Marcela, Maxime Tassin, and Fanny Meunier. "Speech-in-speech perception and executive function involvement." PLOS ONE 12, no. 7 (July 14, 2017): e0180084. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180084.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Wang, Yuanyuan, and Derek M. Houston. "Attention to speech, speech perception, and referential learning." Applied Psycholinguistics 39, no. 4 (July 2018): 764–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0142716418000231.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Nijland, Lian. "Speech perception in children with speech output disorders." Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 23, no. 3 (January 2009): 222–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699200802399947.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Cooper, Angela, and Ann R. Bradlow. "Talker familiarity effects on speech-in-speech perception." Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134, no. 5 (November 2013): 4074. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4830883.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Haas, Ellen C. "Auditory Perception." Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting 36, no. 3 (October 1992): 247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1518/107118192786751817.

Full text

Abstract:

Auditory perception involves the human listener's awareness or apprehension of auditory stimuli in the environment. Auditory stimuli, which include speech communications as well as non-speech signals, occur in the presence and absence of environmental noise. Non-speech auditory signals range from simple pure tones to complex signals found in three-dimensional auditory displays. Special hearing protection device (HPD) designs, as well as additions to conventional protectors, have been developed to improve speech communication and auditory perception capabilities of those exposed to noise. The thoughtful design of auditory stimuli and the proper design, selection, and use of HPDs within the environment can improve human performance and reduce accidents. The purpose of this symposium will be to discuss issues in auditory perception and to describe methods to improve the perception of auditory stimuli in environments with and without noise. The issues of interest include the perception of non-speech auditory signals and the improvement of auditory perception capabilities of persons exposed to noise. The first three papers of this symposium describe the perception of non-speech auditory signals. Ellen Haas defines the extent to which certain signal elements affect the perceived urgency of auditory warning signals. Michael D. Good and Dr. Robert H. Gilkey investigate free-field masking as a function of the spatial separation between signal and masker sounds within the horizontal and median planes. Jeffrey M. Gerth explores the discrimination of complex auditory signal components that differ by sound category, temporal pattern, density, and component manipulation. The fourth paper of this symposium focuses upon the improvement of auditory perception capabilities of persons exposed to hazardous noise, and who must wear hearing protection. Special HPD designs, as well as additions to conventional protectors, have been developed to improve speech communication and auditory perception capabilities of persons exposed to noise. Dr. John G. Casali reviews several new HPD technologies and describes construction features, empirical performance data, and applications of each device. These papers illustrate current research issues in the perception of auditory signals. The issues are all relevant to the human factors engineering of auditory signals and personal protective gear. The perception of auditory stimuli can be improved by the thoughtful human factors design of auditory stimuli and by the proper use of HPDs.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Gasser, Emily, Byron Ahn, Donna Jo Napoli, and Z. L. Zhou. "Production, perception, and communicative goals of American newscaster speech." Language in Society 48, no. 2 (February 22, 2019): 233–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0047404518001392.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractListeners often have the intuition that the speech of broadcast news reporters somehow ‘sounds different’; previous literature supports this observation and has described some distinctive aspects of newscaster register. This article presents two studies further describing the characteristic properties and functions of American English newscaster speech, focusing specifically on prosody. In the first, we investigate the production of newscaster speech. We describe the measurable differences in pitch, speed, intensity, and melodic features between newscaster and conversational speech, and connect those traits to perceptions of authority, credibility, charisma, and related characteristics. In the second, we investigate the perception of newscaster speech. Our experiments demonstrate that listeners can distinguish newscaster from conversational speech given only prosodic information, and that they use a subset of the newscasters’ distinguishing features to do so. (News, prosody, discourse registers, speech perception, credibility, authority)*

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Wang, Xinchun. "L2 Speech Learning." Cadernos de Linguística 1, no. 1 (July 9, 2020): 01–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.25189/2675-4916.2020.v1.n1.id280.

Full text

Abstract:

Adult L2 learners have difficulties in perceiving and producing L2 speech sounds. In analyzing learners’ L2 speech learning problems, this study provides research data from a series of studies on L2 speech perception, production, and training. Section 1 investigates how the L1 sound system influences L2 speech perception. A recent study shows that phonetic differences and distances between English and Mandarin consonants predicted the perceptual problems of Mandarin consonants by native English learners of Chinese. Section 2 explores the relationship between L2 speech perception and production and reports a subsequent study on Mandarin consonants that shows English learners of Chinese performed better in perception than production on Mandarin retroflex sounds but vice versa on palatal sounds. The lack of alignment between perception and production suggests the relationship between L2 speech perception and production is not straightforward. In Section 3, two training experiments are reported and compared to explore the effects of phonetic training on the learning of English vowel and Mandarin tone contrasts.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Rosenblum, Lawrence D. "Speech Perception as a Multimodal Phenomenon." Current Directions in Psychological Science 17, no. 6 (December 2008): 405–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00615.x.

Full text

Abstract:

Speech perception is inherently multimodal. Visual speech (lip-reading) information is used by all perceivers and readily integrates with auditory speech. Imaging research suggests that the brain treats auditory and visual speech similarly. These findings have led some researchers to consider that speech perception works by extracting amodal information that takes the same form across modalities. From this perspective, speech integration is a property of the input information itself. Amodal speech information could explain the reported automaticity, immediacy, and completeness of audiovisual speech integration. However, recent findings suggest that speech integration can be influenced by higher cognitive properties such as lexical status and semantic context. Proponents of amodal accounts will need to explain these results.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

KAWANO, Atsushi, and Michio HAZAMA. "Speech Perception by Cochlear Implantation." Nihon Gekakei Rengo Gakkaishi (Journal of Japanese College of Surgeons) 25, no. 1 (2000): 15–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.4030/jjcs1979.25.1_15.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Bantwal, Anuradha R., and James W. Hall III. "Pediatric Speech Perception in Noise." Current Pediatric Reviews 7, no. 3 (August 1, 2011): 214–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/157339611796548447.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

YANG, Xiaohu, and Yong ZHAO. "L2 Speech Perception in Noise." Advances in Psychological Science 22, no. 6 (2014): 934. http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1042.2014.00934.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Surprenant, Aimée M., Louis Goldstein, and Ian Neath. "The perception of speech gestures." Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 93, no. 4 (April 1993): 2393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.406016.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Journal articles on the topic 'Speech perception'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles