Relevant bibliographies by topics / Soviet nationalitites policy

Academic literature on the topic 'Soviet nationalitites policy'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 10 December 2022
Last updated: 29 January 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Contents

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Soviet nationalitites policy.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Soviet nationalitites policy"

1

Pod’iapol’skii, Sergey A. "Soviet Nationalities Policy of the 1960s - early 1980s." Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences 9, no. 04 (April 2016): 904–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.17516/1997-1370-2016-9-4-904-926.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Shcherbak, Andrey. "Nationalism in the USSR: a historical and comparative perspective." Nationalities Papers 43, no. 6 (November 2015): 866–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2015.1072811.

Full text
Abstract:
The late 1980s and early 1990s were characterized by the sudden rise of nationalist movements in almost all Soviet ethnic regions. It is argued that the rise ofpoliticalnationalism since the late 1980s can be explained by the development ofculturalnationalism in the previous decades, as an unintended outcome of Communist nationalities policy. All ethnic regions are examined throughout the entire history of the USSR (49 regions, 1917–1991), using the structural equation modeling (SEM) approach. This paper aims to make at least three contributions to the field. First, it is a methodological contribution for studying nationalism: a “quantification of history” approach. Having constructed variables from historical data, I use conventional statistical methods such as SEM. Second, this paper contributes to the theoretical debate about the role of cultural autonomy in multiethnic states. Finally, the paper statistically proves that the break between early Soviet and Stalinist nationalities policy explains the entire Soviet nationalities policy.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Sergey A., Podyapolskiy. "Nationalities Policy of the First Year of the Soviet Regime." Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences 11, no. 5 (May 2018): 795–813. http://dx.doi.org/10.17516/1997-1370-0271.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Legvold, Robert V., and Gerhard Simon. "Nationalism and Policy toward the Nationalities in the Soviet Union." Foreign Affairs 70, no. 5 (1991): 197. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20045065.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Thompson, Ewa M. "Nationalist Propaganda in the Soviet Russian Press, 1939-1941." Slavic Review 50, no. 2 (1991): 385–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2500213.

Full text
Abstract:
The nationalities policy in the Soviet Union under Stalin, and specifically during the period of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, was more complex than has been indicated by many American interpretations. In the Soviet press of that period, many newspapers and periodicals carried articles that dealt with nationality issues. I will consider here the possibility that publication of these articles was part of a propaganda program originated by state policy.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Motyl, Alexander. "Part I: Morning Session: The View from Above." Nationalities Papers 17, no. 1 (1989): 5–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00905998908408094.

Full text
Abstract:
Ladies and gentlemen, permit me to welcome you to the Nationality and Siberian Studies Program's first annual conference on “The Soviet Nationalities and Gorbachev.” With so distinguished a collection of experts, I am certain that our discussion will prove to be both a stimulating intellectual experience and a permanent addition to the debate on Soviet nationality policy.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Wigglesworth-Baker, Teresa. "Language policy and post-Soviet identities in Tatarstan." Nationalities Papers 44, no. 1 (January 2016): 20–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2015.1046425.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper examines language policy and language use as identity technologies in the Republic of Tatarstan approximately 23 years after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Although Tatarstan is an autonomous republic politically situated within the Russian Federation, it has its own language policy which was implemented in 1992 and which declares Russian and Tatar as the official state languages having equal status in all spheres of language use. Additionally, as a result of an education policy implemented in 1997, Tatar language learning was made a compulsory subject in schools for all nationalities. This research examines how these policies have legitimized the Tatar identity alongside Russian from the top-down perspective, but how these legitimacies are not reflected from the bottom-up perspective [Graney 1999. “Education Reform in Tatarstan and Bashkortostan: Sovereignty Projects in Post-Soviet Russia.”Europe-Asia Studies51 (4): 611-632; Yemelianova 2000. “Shaimiev's ‘Khanate’ on the Volga and its Russian Subjects.”Asian Ethnicity1 (1)]. The focus of this research was to find out how effective these language and education policies as top-down identity technologies have been in post-Soviet Tatar society. An empirical research was carried out in Kazan in 2013 and revealed that asymmetrical bilingualism still prevails in contemporary Tatar society: Russian is used for everyday purposes by all nationalities, whereas Tatar is used as an in-group marker among Tatars within informal settings.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Hoppe, Hans-Joachim. "Bulgarian Nationalities Policy in Occupied Thrace and Aegean Macedonia." Nationalities Papers 14, no. 1-2 (1986): 89–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00905998608408035.

Full text
Abstract:
After the outbreak of World War II, the Bulgarian government pursued a policy of non-alignment. In the fall of 1940 it rejected plans for a combined Italian-Bulgarian attack against Greece. And when Italy alone invaded Greece, Bulgaria facilitated Greek resistance by her own passivity. When Germany called on Bulgaria to enter the Tripartite Pact and make its territory available for a German attack against Greece, the Bulgarian leadership succeeded in retarding the talks. At the same time, the Soviet Union, Germany's Balkan rival, tried to entice Bulgaria into concluding a pact of mutual assistance by offering the whole of western and eastern Thrace at the expense of both Turkey and Greece. Bulgaria refused, and on 1 March 1941 joined the alliance with Germany in hope of territorial gains. It took this step only when it seemed unavoidable.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Ishanxodjaeva, Z. R., and R. Makhkamova. "FORCED RELOCATION OF KOREANS TO UZBEKISTAN IN 1937-1938." European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Management Studies 02, no. 05 (May 1, 2022): 220–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.55640/eijmrms-02-05-43.

Full text
Abstract:
As a result of the repressive policy pursued by the Soviet authorities, even a small part of the nationalities living in the country were unjustifiably expelled from the territories where they lived. As a result of this policy, it was relocated to Uzbekistan, along with other republics of the former Soviet Union. The mass forced relocation of Koreans to Uzbekistan, along with other minorities, began in 1937-1938. In short, this article discusses the history of the resettlement of Koreans.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Weitz, Eric D. "Racial Politics without the Concept of Race: Reevaluating Soviet Ethnic and National Purges." Slavic Review 61, no. 1 (2002): 1–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2696978.

Full text
Abstract:
Eric D. Weitz argues that the Soviet Union promoted the development of national institutions and consciousness and explicidy rejected the ideology of race. Yet traces of racial politics crept into Soviet nationalities policies, especially between 1937 and 1953. In the Stalin period particular populations were endowed with immutable traits that every member of the group possessed and that were passed from one generation to the next. Recent scholarship, he suggests, has been resistant to drawing out the racial elements in the Stalinist purges of certain nationalities. Francine Hirsch challenges Weitz’s argument, arguing that the Soviet regime had a developed concept of “race,” but did not practice what contemporaries thought of as “racial politics.” Hirsch argues that while the Nazi regime attempted to enact social change by racial means, the Soviet regime aspired to build socialism dirough the manipulation of mass (national and class) consciousness. She contends that it is imperative to analyze the conceptual categories that both regimes used in order to undertake a true comparative analysis. Weiner proposes that Soviet population politics constandy fluctuated between sociological and biological categorization. Although the Soviets often came close to adapting bioracial principles and practices, at no point did they let human heredity become a defining feature of political schemes. Race in the Soviet world applied mainly to concerns for the health of population groups. Despite the capacity to conduct genocidal campaigns and operate death camps, the Soviets never sought the physical extermination of entire groups nor did they stop celebrating the multiethnicity of tiieir polity. The radicalization of state violence in the postwar era was triggered by the nature and role of the war in the Soviet world, the alleged conduct of those who failed to rise to the occasion, and the endemic unstable and unassimilated borderlands, and not by the genetic makeup of the internal enemies. Alaina Lemon’s contribution suggests that scholars seek racialized concepts by treating discourse as situated practice, rather than by separating discourse from practice. This allows consideration of the ways people use language not only to name categories but also to point to social relationships (such as “race”) with or without explicidy naming them as such. Doing so, however, is admittedly more difficult when the only available evidence of past discursive practices are printed texts or interviews. In conclusion, Weitz responds to these critics.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Soviet nationalitites policy"

1

Brewin, Jennifer Ellen. "Navigating 'national form' and 'socialist content' in the Great Leader's homeland : Georgian painting and national politics under Stalin, 1921-39." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 2019. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/290266.

Full text
Abstract:
This thesis examines the interaction of Georgian painting and national politics in the first two decades of Soviet power in Georgia, 1921-1939, focussing in particular on the period following the consolidation of Stalin's power at the helm of the Communist Party in 1926-7. In the Stalin era, Georgians enjoyed special status among Soviet nations thanks to Georgia's prestige as the place of Stalin's birth. However, Georgians' advanced sense of their national sovereignty and initial hostility towards Bolshevik control following Georgia's Sovietisation in 1921 also resulted in Georgia's uniquely fraught relationship with Soviet power in Moscow in the decades that followed. In light of these circumstances, this thesis explores how and why the experience and activities of Georgian painters between 1926 and 1939 differed from those of other Soviet artists. One of its central arguments is that the experiences of Georgian artists and critics in this period not only differed significantly from those of artists and critics of other republics, but that the uniqueness of their experience was precipitated by a complex network of factors resulting from the interaction of various political imperatives and practical circumstances, including those relating to Soviet national politics. Chapter one of this thesis introduces the key institutions and individuals involved in producing, evaluating and setting the direction of Georgian painting in the 1920s and early 1930s. Chapters two and three show that artists and critics in Georgia as well as commentators in Moscow in the 1920s and 30s were actively engaged in efforts to interpret the Party's demand for 'national form' in Soviet culture and to suggest what that form might entail as regards Georgian painting. However, contradictions inherent in Soviet nationalities policy, which both demanded the active cultivation of cultural difference between Soviet nationalities and eagerly anticipated a time when national distinctions in all spheres would naturally disappear, made it impossible for an appropriate interpretation of 'national form' to be identified. Chapter three, moreover, demonstrates how frequent shifts in Soviet cultural and nationalities policies presented Moscow institutions with a range of practical challenges which ultimately prevented them from reflecting in their exhibitions and publications the contemporary artistic activity taking place in the republics of the Caucasus and Central Asia. A key finding of chapters four and five concerns the uniquely significant role that Lavrenty Beria, Stalin's ruthless deputy and the head of the Georgian and Transcaucasian Party organisations, played in differentiating Georgian painters' experiences from those of Soviet artists of other nationalities. Beginning in 1934, Beria employed Georgian painters to produce an exhibition of monumental paintings, opening at the Tretyakov Gallery in Moscow in 1937, depicting episodes from his own falsified history of Stalin's role in the revolutionary movement in Transcaucasia. As this thesis shows, the production of the exhibition introduced an unprecedented degree of direct Party supervision over Georgian painting as Beria personally critiqued works by Georgian painters produced on prescribed narrative subjects in a centralised collective studio. As well as representing a major contribution to Stalin's personality cult, the exhibition, which conferred on Georgian painters special responsibility for representing Stalin and his activities, was also a public statement of the special status that the Georgians were now to enjoy, second only to that of the Russians. However, this special status involved both special privileges and special responsibilities. Georgians would enjoy special access to opportunities in Moscow and a special degree of autonomy in local governance, but in return they were required to lead the way in declaring allegiance to the Stalin regime. Chapter six returns to the debate about 'national form' in Georgian painting by examining how the pre-Revolutionary self-taught Georgian painter, Niko Pirosmani, was discussed by cultural commentators in Georgia and Moscow in the 1920s and 30s as a source informing a Soviet or Soviet Georgian canon of painting. It shows that, in addition to presenting views on the suitability of Pirosmani's painting either in terms of its formal or class content, commentators perpetuated and developed a cult of Pirosmani steeped in stereotypes of a Georgian 'national character.' Further, the establishment of this cult during the late 1920s and early 1930s seems to have been a primary reason for the painter's subsequent canonisation in the second half of the 1930s as a 'Great Tradition' of Soviet Georgian culture. It helped to articulate a version of Georgian national identity that was at once familiar and gratifying for Georgians and useful for the Soviet regime. The combined impression of cultural sovereignty embodied in this and other 'Great Traditions' of Soviet Georgian culture and the special status articulated through the 1937 exhibition allowed Georgian nationalism to be aligned, for a time, with support for Stalin and the Soviet regime.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Tezic, Mustafa Can. "The Russian Population In The Kazakh Steppes." Master's thesis, METU, 2006. http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/3/12608060/index.pdf.

Full text
Abstract:
This thesis aims to understand the formation of the Russian identity in the Kazakh Steppes by examining the migration flows of Russians and the affects of state policies and pattern of inter-ethnic relations between the Russians and the Kazakhs during different historical periods. Constructionist theoryhas guided the analysis of the research. The Russian identity formation in the Kazakh Steppes is examined within the contextof three consequtive historical periods that correspond to fundamental social, political and administartive re-structuring. Firstis the period of the Russiam Empire, during which the resettlement policy of the Empire shattered the traditional social structures of the native Kazakhs and entailed extensive inter-ethnic contact between the Russians and the Kazakhs. Second period corresponds to the period of the Soviet Union, which experianced the intensification of Russian settelments in the Kazakh Steppes. The soviet policy, while encouraging Russianness as a component of soviet identity, atthe same time, granted autonomy todiverse ethnic entites. The third period, which correspondes to the current era starting with the disintegration of the Soviet Union, witnessed the emergance of Kazakh State. A large portion of the Russian population in the Kazakh Steppes remained in the independent republic of Kazakhstan and face a new challenges in tearms of identity formation due to the Kazakh nation building policies.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Usta, Ali Deniz. "The Reconstruction Of The Past In The Process Of Nation Building In Kazakhstan." Master's thesis, METU, 2007. http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12608897/index.pdf.

Full text
Abstract:
In this thesis, the purpose is to analyze the path that the nation building process in Kazakhstan has been following in the post-Soviet period through examining the various policies implemented and the official rhetoric and discourses stated by the Kazakh policymakers. The ethno-symbolist approach of Anthony D. Smith and the views of Walker Connor and Willfried Spohn on nationalism and national identity have been utilized in the analysis of the research. The Soviet Nationalities Policy is examined to be able to better understand the post-Soviet nation-building, because the policies implemented under this comprehensive project, which had been outlined by the Bolsheviks, had deep political, cultural, demographic and linguistic impacts on the process in Kazakhstan. The ethnic situation has also been laid down in order to highlight under which ethnic circumstances the nation building process has been taking place. After analyzing the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the post-Soviet policies about language, education, employment, culture and national symbols, the statements of the President Nursultan Nazarbayev and the move of capital, this study claims that post-Soviet nation building process and nationalism in Kazakhstan have both ethnic and civic components whereby the nation building process in Kazakhstan is a more ethnic process than it is civic.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Gorovykh, Trembasiewicz Yelena. "Le rôle des politiques culturelles au Kazakhstan et au Kirghizstan de 1991 à nos jours : du multiculturalisme au "développement culturel durable"." Thesis, Paris, INALCO, 2020. http://www.theses.fr/2020INAL0010.

Full text
Abstract:
La culture joue un rôle très important pour le développement des pays. Dans ce contexte nous ne parlons pas seulement du développement économique, mais aussi du développement général de la société, de sa cohésion, de l’équilibre environnemental qui tous ensemble contribuent à une croissance socio-économique durable. C’est dans ce cadre que se pose notre problématique de recherche au travers d’une région qui a vécu de grands changements au niveau politique, économique et social. Dans une démarche comparative, nous nous appuierons sur l’étude des évolutions de la politique culturelle, aux travers des dimensions culturelles et des projets culturels ayant des effets sur ce secteur, dans ces deux pays d’Asie Centrale, le Kazakhstan et le Kirghizstan. La thèse se compose de deux parties principales en couvrant la période de 1991 à 2016. Tout d’abord dans la première partie, nous reviendrons un peu dans le temps afin d’étudier les racines historiques pour mieux comprendre les bases sur lesquelles cette nouvelle page d’histoire des pays indépendants a été écrite. Ensuite, toujours dans la première partie, on verra si l'héritage soviétique de ces pays après leur indépendance est devenu le facteur déterminant dans la réalisation des nouvelles politiques culturels. Enfin, dans la deuxième partie, on démontrera l'évolution du rôle de la culture au Kazakhstan et au Kirghizstan pour voir s’il y a des liaisons entre la culture et la croissance économique et développement sociale. Notre thèse a un grand intérêt car le développement durable à travers le secteur culturel reste peu exploité en Asie Centrale
Culture plays a very important role for the development of countries. In this context, we are talking not only about economic development, but also about the general development of society, its cohesion, and the environmental balance that all together contribute to sustainable socio-economic growth. It is in this context that our research problem arises through a region that has undergone major changes at the political, economic and social levels. In a comparative approach, we will rely on the study of the evolution of the cultural policy, through cultural dimensions and cultural projects having effects on this sector, in the two countries of Central Asia: Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. The thesis consists of two main parts covering the period from 1991 to 2016. In the first part, we will come back in time to study the historical roots in order to better understand the bases on which this new page history of independent countries was written. Then, still in the first part, we will see whether the Soviet heritage of these countries after their independence has become the determining factor in the realization of new cultural policies. Finally, in the second part, we will demonstrate the changing role of culture in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan to see if there are links between culture and economic growth and social development. Our thesis is of great interest because sustainable development through the cultural sector remains not so much exploited in Central Asia
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Min, Lisa Sangmi. "Vignettes of identity : a photographic analysis of the Koryo Saram, 1932-1941." Thesis, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/2152/ETD-UT-2010-05-1371.

Full text
Abstract:
The identity of the Koreans of the former Soviet Union has been shaped by a variety of factors, not the least of which was a long period of Soviet rule. Most frequently referred to as Koryo Saram in the region, they are distinctive in that they embody a mélange of Korean, Russian, Soviet and Central Asian characteristics. At first promoted as one of the many national minorities under the affirmative action-like Soviet nationalities policy, changes in the political sphere under Stalin ultimately led to their deportation to Central Asia in 1937. The Koryo Saram were subject to a variety of pressures at the hands of the state apparatus, including a complex and often contradictory nationalities policy, which often dictated that the they simultaneously assume a Korean and Soviet identity. This fact is most vividly displayed in the photographs of the period, which serve as historical documents that preserved these internal conflicts. This thesis examines not only the schism between the party rhetoric and the visual presentation of rhetoric from 1932 to 1941, but also the construction of Soviet Korean identity within this context.
text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Soviet nationalitites policy"

1

The Sorcerer as apprentice: Stalin as commissar of nationalities, 1917-1924. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press, 1994.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Nationalism and policy toward the nationalities in the Soviet Union: From totalitarian dictatorship to post-Stalinist society. Boulder: Westview Press, 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Ethnicity, nationalism and conflict in the South Caucasus: Nagorno-Karabakh and the legacy of Soviet nationalities policy. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2011.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Gorbachev, Mikhail Sergeevich. Mikhail Gorbachev's address and report on Soviet nationalities policy: An unannotated presentation by the General Secretary in 1989. Edited by Samuels Raymond. Ottawa, Ont: Agora Cosmopolitain, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Affairs, United States Congress Senate Committee on Foreign Relations Subcommittee on European. Soviet disunion: Creating a nationalities policy : hearing before the Subcommittee on European Affairs of the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, One Hundred First Congress, second session, July 24, 1990. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1990.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

United States. Congress. Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe. Implementation of the Helsinki accords: Hearing before the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, One Hundredth Congress, second session, the nationalities issue in the Soviet Union--the limits of reform, September 15, 1988. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1988.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

United States. Congress. Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe. Implementation of the Helsinki accords: Hearing before the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, One Hundredth Congress, second session, the nationalities issue in the Soviet Union--the limits of reform, September 15, 1988. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1988.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Simon, Gerhard. Nationalism and Policy Toward the Nationalities in the Soviet Union. Taylor & Francis Group, 2019.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Simon, Gerhard. Nationalism and Policy Toward the Nationalities in the Soviet Union. Routledge, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429044168.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Simon, Gerhard, Karen Forster, and Oswald Forster. Nationalism and Policy Toward the Nationalities in the Soviet Union. Taylor & Francis Group, 2020.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Soviet nationalitites policy"

1

Rees, E. A. "Nationalities Policy." In The Soviet Communist Party in Disarray, 90–118. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230389205_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Hosking, Geoffrey. "The Soviet Union." In The Oxford World History of Empire, 1187–216. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197532768.003.0043.

Full text
Abstract:
The USSR was a unique empire in the universality of its claims and its aim of complete equality between nationalities. Its strengths and weaknesses were indissolubly connected. It was formally a federal state, with extensive rights given to constituent nationalities; in practice it was tightly centralized through Gosplan, the armed forces, the security services, and the Communist Party, with its messianic ideology. The USSR’s tight centralization ensured that in wartime it could mobilize social energy to an unprecedented extent, but also that in peacetime localized patronage became the main form of social cohesion. The economy was so rigidly planned as to discourage innovation, which meant that the USSR could not maintain its superpower status. Its nationality policy both encouraged ethnic feeling and repressed it. The final collapse was precipitated by the clash between the largest republic, Russia, and the Soviet Union as a whole.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

"9. The Revised Soviet Nationalities Policy, 1933-1939." In The Affirmative Action Empire, 344–93. Cornell University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.7591/9781501713323-013.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Palko, Olena. "DEBATING THE EARLY SOVIET NATIONALITIES POLICY: THE CASE OF SOVIET UKRAINE." In The Fate of the Bolshevik Revolution. Bloomsbury Academic, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350117938.ch-011.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Simon, Gerhard. "Stalin’s “Solution” to the Nationalities Issue." In Nationalism and Policy Toward the Nationalities in the Soviet Union, 135–72. Routledge, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429044168-6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

"The Establishment of the Central Authorities for the Application of the Nationalities Policy (a) Instructions on the Organization of Local Depart- ments for Nationalities : (b) Decreeon the Reorganization - of the People's Commissariatfor Nationalities: (c) The Statute of the People's Commissariat for Nationalities: (d) The Statute ofthejirst Soviet ofNationalities." In The Nationalities Problem & Soviet Administration, 41–50. Routledge, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315008387-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Edgar, Adrienne. "Mixed Families and the Russian Language." In Intermarriage and the Friendship of Peoples, 161–86. Cornell University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501762949.003.0008.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter reviews the language used among mixed families, who were more likely than monoethnic families to use Russian, the Soviet lingua franca, as their primary language. The result was a frequent disconnect between official nationality and language use for many ethnically mixed children. It talks about the tendency of families to use Russian as their primary language, which was one of the characteristics that caused them to be portrayed in glowing terms as the most Soviet of all Soviet families. The chapter examines the policy of korenizatsiia, or nativization, first formulated in the 1920s, which insisted on the importance of indigenous languages for all Soviet nationalities. It explores the strong incentives for people to acquire Russian-language proficiency in non-Russian republics and the promotion of Russian as the Soviet lingua franca had intensified over time.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Simon, Gerhard. "Introduction." In Nationalism and Policy Toward the Nationalities in the Soviet Union, 1–19. Routledge, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429044168-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Simon, Gerhard. "Nation-Building." In Nationalism and Policy Toward the Nationalities in the Soviet Union, 20–70. Routledge, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429044168-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Simon, Gerhard. "“Great-Russian Chauvinism” and the Nationalism of the Other Peoples." In Nationalism and Policy Toward the Nationalities in the Soviet Union, 71–92. Routledge, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429044168-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Soviet nationalitites policy' for particular source types:
Journal articles Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography