Dissertations / Theses on the topic 'South China Sea International status'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 40 dissertations / theses for your research on the topic 'South China Sea International status.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse dissertations / theses on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
Bentley, Scott. "China's New Maritime Legal Enforcement Strategy in the South China Sea: Legal Warfare and an Emerging Contest Over Norms at Sea." Ohio University / OhioLINK, 2012. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ohiou1352918934.
Full textHinton, Joseph R. "From SEATO to ASEAN: Prospects for Collective Security in Southeast Asia." Scholarship @ Claremont, 2016. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/1255.
Full textRoberts, Anthea Elizabeth. "Is International Law International?" Phd thesis, Canberra, ACT : The Australian National University, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/1885/124611.
Full textJackson, John W. "China in the South China Sea genuine multilateralism or a wolf in sheep's clothing?" Thesis, Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/10945/9984.
Full textDurani, Luis A. "China and the South China Sea: The Emergence of the Huaqing Doctrine." Thesis, Virginia Tech, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/64376.
Full textMaster of Arts
Sandy, Jordan M. "Chinese Nationalism and the South China Sea." Wright State University / OhioLINK, 2020. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wright1598620673257404.
Full textTackett, Trevor M. "China-Philippine Joint Explorations| The Future of Competition and Cooperation in the South China Sea." Thesis, The George Washington University, 2018. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10822348.
Full textThe South China Sea has long been a region of competition and tension. In the Spratly Islands alone, Brunei, China, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan, and Vietnam maintain disputing claims to the region’s land features and surrounding maritime territories. Some argue that ongoing negotiations between China and the Philippines toward joint explorations of one of these disputed regions could be the key to promoting greater cooperation amongst the other claimants. These arguments, however, do not consider other elements of the international system that drive states to compete. Looking specifically at China, the Philippines, and the United States, this thesis analyzes joint explorations within the framework of motivational realism to understand the interaction of relevant historical elements, state objectives, and state estimations of one another’s power, offense-defense balance, and motives—greedy or security-seeking. The thesis then examines the specific case of joint explorations to understand historical, domestic, and international legal components restricting the pathways within which the two states could reach an agreement. Finally, this thesis concludes that, due to domestic constraints, international legal developments, state objectives, and the way in which China, the Philippines, and the United States assess one another’s motives, the South China Sea will likely remain a region of long-term competition and tension.
Nguyen, Lan-Anh Thi. "The South China Sea dispute : a reappraisal in the light of international law." Thesis, University of Bristol, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/1983/2aca0802-4fc2-400e-bcf4-e9bc3000dca1.
Full textJohnson, Adam Nieves. "A Bilateral Analysis of the South China Sea Dispute: China, the Philippines, and the Scarborough Shoal." FIU Digital Commons, 2012. http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/661.
Full textDonahue, Connor Patrick. "Mare Imperium: the Evolution of Freedom of the Seas Discourse in U.S. Foreign Policy." Diss., Virginia Tech, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/100305.
Full textDoctor of Philosophy
Currently, the United States is locked in a fierce competition with China in the South China Sea. The United States believes that Chinese actions in the region, such as claiming large swaths of maritime territory, constructing militarized artificial islands, and deploying weaponry designed to endanger American forces operating in the region, violates the principle of freedom of the seas. The United States asserts that it has consistently championed the principle freedom of the seas because it is the essential foundation of international peace and prosperity. Due to this, the U.S. claims that it will continue to defend the principle of freedom of the seas against Chinese depredations. However, this dissertation argues that the United States' political-military strategy in the Western Pacific is misrepresenting the concept of freedom of the seas and therefore failing to see the dangers at stake in the regional confrontation. To show this, this work writes a history of how the concept of freedom of the seas has been used in U.S. foreign policy over the course of American history. Such a history shows that the concept of freedom of the seas has not been consistently championed by the United States and is not an altruistic principle defended on behalf of international peace and prosperity. Instead, this project shows that the concept of freedom of the seas is used by the United States to facilitate control over the world's oceans on behalf of U.S. interests. It is problematic to portray the pursuit of American national interests as a universal altruistic good because it does not leave room open for compromise. In a time where China is rapidly developing their military forces to control sea themselves, basing American political-military strategy on the concept of freedom of the seas is increasingly dangerous.
Garcia, Zenel. "China's Military Modernization, Japan's Normalization and its Effects on the South China Sea Territorial Disputes." FIU Digital Commons, 2014. http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/1315.
Full textBentley, Scott. "Southeast Asia Responds to China’s Maritime Law Enforcement Strategy: Balancing a Perceived Threat by Responding in Kind." Ohio University / OhioLINK, 2013. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ohiou1366802087.
Full textPålstam, Alexander. "What are the Difficulties in Settling the South China Sea Dispute : Obstacles to Dispute Settlement Through the Lens of Liberal and Neo-Realist IR Theory." Thesis, Linnéuniversitetet, Institutionen för statsvetenskap (ST), 2019. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-79873.
Full textChung, Christopher Humanities & Social Science Australian Defence Force Academy UNSW. "The Spratly Islands dispute : decision units and domestic politics." Awarded by:University of New South Wales - Australian Defence Force Academy. School of Humanities and Social Science, 2004. http://handle.unsw.edu.au/1959.4/38658.
Full textWeissmann, Mikael. "Understanding the East Asian Peace : Informal and formal conflict prevention and peacebuilding in the Taiwan Strait, the Korean Peninsula, and the South China Sea 1990-2008." Doctoral thesis, University of Gothenburg, 2009. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-5166.
Full textTang, Shiu-Chu, and 唐旭初. "To Study the Law Status ROC in the South China Sea Islands by International Law's View." Thesis, 1995. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/41478353767686932148.
Full textHsu, Jin-zu, and 許靜芝. "The Research of South China Sea disputes in International Realism." Thesis, 2006. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/15370616863174857468.
Full text國立中山大學
大陸研究所
94
In regard to “The disputes of the South China Sea”, Taiwan and China hold similar positions and advocacies. The complicity of the South China Sea sovereignty was mainly caused by the geopolitics of the East Asia region and the potential economic resources in the area. After the Cold War, the changing status of affairs in the Southeast Asia region and the arrangement of power from neighboring nations have made the dispute over the South China Sea a critical conflicting regional hot spot. America, China, Japan and other great powers have been very concerned about the conflicts of the region due to the potential vast amount of sea mineral resources and freedom of navigation of the international waters. At present, the common consensus of the claiming nations over the South China Sea dispute is to leave aside the dispute of sovereignty and jointly develop this region. However, under the so-called “Peaceful” dialogue, most claming countries were building military facilities behind each other’s back. Basically, the idea of “Joint Development” was an excuse for the balance of power. The expectation of this thesis is to find the answers of the following functions. First, the status quo of the South China Sea and the sovereignty asserts from the claiming states, and the use of the resources and interests of the claiming states will be analyzed. Second, the true intention and reason of ASEAN helping the claiming states to solve the South China Sea dispute will be examined. Third, the evaluation of China’s interests over South China Sea should be explored. Fourth, what are the views from the U.S. and Japan on the disputes. Finally, what strategy that Taiwan should adopt in order to depend the national interests.
YANG, CHUN-LING, and 楊俊陵. "The Resolution of the South China Sea Contention by International Law: A Case of The Philippines Instituted the South China Sea Arbitration." Thesis, 2017. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/prbak2.
Full text國防大學
戰略研究所
105
The South China Sea had became one of hot spots of global conflict, except of historical disputes and geographical characteristics, the main reason is derived from its value and importance. It causes decades of controversy, and even lead to military conflict. When States compete for the interests of the South China Sea, they according to the international law and the law of the sea as the basis for rationalization of their claims and enhance the legitimacy of their behavior. However, due to the tremendous economic interests of the South China Sea region, as well as the sound of the internal political considerations, making the parties are not willing to seek for solutions through judicial or arbitration. Various factors made the dispute more complicated in South China Sea, and increased the difficulty of the way through the international law to resolve disputes. The 2012 Huangyan Island incident triggered a conflict between China and the Philippines, it prompted the Philippines decide to propose international arbitration under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. After the commencement of the case, the PRC adopted various means to highlight its sovereignty. However, due to the PRC treated it indifference on the argument and legal struggle of international law, the legal team of the Philippines was able to win the arbitration under the carefully crafted litigation strategy, causing the PRC’s basic claim of the "Nine-dashed Line" was denied.. But, because of the international anarchy, there is no mechanism beyond the states or the powers to implement the ruling which can execute the result of the arbitration, so that the PRC is able to continue adhering its claim and expansion operations in the South China Sea. After the arbitration, all claimant countries have shown goodwill to the PRC, the maintenance of the international rule of law is not the primary concern for all countries. The pursuit of interest is the most important factor in the state's decision-making strategy. The ideal of liberalism is still difficult to break through the framework of realism.
Peng, TsengHong, and 彭增洪. "Asian Seas International Acoustic Experiment--Ambient Noise Study in South China Sea." Thesis, 2003. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/10331134591811689271.
Full textKu, Chih-Wen, and 顧志文. "Joint Development of Hydrocarbon Deposits in the South China Sea: International Legal Perspective." Thesis, 2017. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/h675sw.
Full text國立臺灣師範大學
政治學研究所
105
The significances of the South China Sea are the potential hydrocarbon deposits reserved, sea lines of communication and productive living resources. These are the reasons the claimants to the South China Sea claim sovereignty over the maritime features and their surrounding waters. Claims are based on historical evidence, pre-occupation or the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Recently all claimants have been bolstering some infrastructure on their maritime features such as airstrips, radar systems and harbors for vessels. This behavior complicates the situation. Thus, this thesis answers the following questions: firstly, what is the geopolitical situation in the South China Sea and the reasons for the disputes? Secondly, what is Joint Development of Hydrocarbon Deposits and some of its history of successful implementation; thirdly, the analysis of the applicability of Joint Development of Hydrocarbon Deposits in the South China Sea. Fourthly, how can Joint Development Agreement be applied in the South China Sea? The findings are as follows, firstly, Joint Development of Hydrocarbon Deposits are an appropriate way to address disputes in the South China Sea because it doesn’t touch sovereignty issues and is just a method to jointly explore and exploit the hydrocarbon deposits of the South China Sea. Also, since Joint Development of Hydrocarbon Deposits only deals with sovereign rights, the Republic of China can still enjoy the right to be involved in any Joint Development of Hydrocarbon Deposits agreements. Secondly, Claimants lack mutual trust. Successful implementation of Joint Development of Hydrocarbon Deposits is a way to garner mutual trust. Reviving the 2005 tripartite agreement on the Reed Bank would serve as a good model for claimants to deal with disputes. Three suggestions emanating from my research are: the first one is if the tripartite agreement is to work, the Republic of China will have to participate under the aegis of a private oil company as opposed to a participation of the government. Secondly, Joint Development of Hydrocarbon Deposits is a way for all claimants not only to cooperate with each other but also to appease sovereignty conflict. The said actions could contribute to mutual trust thereby leading to further cooperation. Thirdly, conducting meetings as dual meetings can stabilize the situation and create the peaceful and prosperous environment on the South China Sea.
YANG, CHUN-LIANG, and 楊竣喨. "Discusses mechanism of the international law of the sea conflict solution from the South China Sea arbitration document." Thesis, 2018. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/ynn2j6.
Full text國立臺灣海洋大學
海洋法律研究所
106
Abstract This article first elaborates on the sovereignty of the of the South China Sea and its claims. To explore international arbitration: rights and obligations under general, regional or bilateral agreements and to mediate conflicts between States to settle disputes. On the history of the history of the sea area of the case, to control the two sides of the South China Sea waters of the historical waters and the "U-shaped line" of the relevant research, and then on the cross-strait policy of the development of the South China Sea. South China Sea Arbitration Analysis: South China Sea Arbitration of the proposed timetable, the Philippines South Sea arbitration case on the cross-strait policy of the South China Sea, the subsequent development of arbitration results, China's South China Sea policy dilemma and response. And then explore the South China Sea dispute settlement mechanism and the possibility of cooperation, but the two sides of the South China Sea cooperation is the largest profits. The South China Sea is rich in oil, natural gas and a variety of mineral resources, it has become the waters of neighboring countries compete for. In recent years, the dispute over the South China Sea is mainly by the Philippine Parliament through the "territorial waters line bill", the Huangyan Island and the Nansha Islands part of the island reef is divided into Philippine territory. The Malaysian government submits to the Congress a continental shelf amendment bill as a legal basis for submitting EEZ and continental reefs to the United Nations. Making the South China Sea issue from the territorial and territorial disputes, evolved into marine resources and energy contention; the South China Sea dispute has become the fuse of Asia-Pacific security. Taiwan has sovereignty over the territory of the South China Sea. China's fishermen who have been fishing for a long time in the South China Sea have frequently suffered from illegal detention in the Philippines and Vietnam, not only harming the fishermen's economy in China, but also endangering the lives of fishermen, based on national interests and territorial sovereignty. The 1945 United Nations Charter gives States the obligation to settle peacefully with each other in an agreement with each other and the freedom to choose a peaceful solution to the dispute. In 1982, UNCLOS further recognized the norms of peaceful settlement of disputes under the Charter of the United Nations and, with respect to the principle of national sovereignty, specifically set out a set of dispute settlement provisions for the maintenance of the stability of the world's maritime law.
Liang, Ming-Hua, and 梁銘華. "The ROC claimed "Historic Waters" in the South China Sea: A View of International Law." Thesis, 1998. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/33568567351108543763.
Full text淡江大學
東南亞研究所
86
The ROC government claimed that the water of the South China Sea enclosed by the "U"-shaped line is the ROC''s historic waters is 1992. Moreover, in the Guideline for Nanhai (South China Sea) policy approved by the ROC Executive Yuan in April 1993, the water enclosed by the "U"-shaped line are claimed again as the ROC''s historic waters and subject to the jurisdiction of the ROC. The ROC claim to nearly 80% of the South China Sea as its historic waters. This claim will have a trmendous impact on the future delimitaton of maritime boundaries in the area. There are six states claim title to all or part of the South China Sea--the ROC, the PRC, the SRV (Socialist Republic of Vietnam ), the Philoppines, Malaysia, and Brunei. ROC''s claim will deepen animosity among the six claimants and there is an urgent need to explore the issue thoroughly. This thesis will examine the legal status regarding Taiwan''s claim to the waters of the South China Sea enclosed by the "U"-shaped line as its historic waters. This thesis is divided into five chapters except introduction and conclusion. The summary of each chapter will be described in the following paragraphs: Chapter1: South China Sea Surrounding and ROC''s "Historic Waters" Claim. In this chapter will discuss the claims of the ROC and introduce briefly about the South China Sea''s situation, water, territorial sea dispute, and internaional political. Chapter2: The concept of "Historic Water" . The major issue of this chapter is dealing with domestic and abroad scholars'' atudies and UN Secretariat''s two preparatory documents, that was published in 1957 and 1962, about Historic bay (Water). The prupose of discussing forenamed issues is to find out what is the general concept of Historic Waters. Chapter3: Whether the "Historic Water" is internation Law Standard. This chapter is to exmine "Historic Water" by using the source of International Law---Common International Law and Treaty Law. In dealing with Common Law, this chapter will discuss and examine the State Practices regarding "Historic Water"(including Historic Bay and Archipelago) in the world. Chapter4: The Evaluaton of ROC''s "Historic Water" Claim. Using preamble concepts to evaluate the legal status of "Historic Water" of South China Sea claimed by ROC. There are two main issues: (1)What is "U"-shaped line; (2)the legal status of the waters enclosed by the "U"-shaped line, namely, whether the "U"-shaped line is "Baseline" or it''s not and whether the waters enclosed by the "U"-shaped line is ROC''s "Historic Water" or it''s not. Chapter5: The Principles of deal with Martime Dispute in South China Sea. After Studying, I found out that ROC government couldn''t claim Historic Waters and "U"-shaped line in the South China Sea. The maritime rights of South China Sea depend depend on the authority of islands of South China Sea.
Lai, Chien-Chih, and 賴建志. "A Study on the Legal Status of Taiping Island─Focus on The South China Sea Arbitration." Thesis, 2017. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/marq27.
Full text中央警察大學
水上警察研究所
105
Since the judgment of The South China Sea Arbitration was confirmed, the domestic public opinion ran high, and the standard of the arbitration court was questioned. The arbitrators didn’t seem to understand the real state of Itu Aba Fully. They believed what the Philippines said and handed out. In order to understand the case, we have to check the standard of the case and what the Philippines’ positions are . When it come to how to define islands, we must have a discussion about the regime of islands. We focus on 1982 the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, look over its legislative reason and analyze the element of the island and definition. After Understanding the definition of the island, we have a discussion about the right of the island and how we deal with the problem of overlapping the area among the countries, and what roles the island act, what the influence is and various factors we have to take into consideration. After understanding tentatively, we can carry on the discussion about the arbitrating case of the South China Sea. We will discuss the position of the Philippines, People’s republic of China and Republic of China, and how they prove the legal status of Itu Aba. The arbitral tribunal’s position is also important, which will influence how we define the legal status of an island. Itu Aba is judged as a rock, which means that Itu Aba doesn’t have its own exclusive economic zone and continental shelf, and that seriously infringes our country’s sovereignty right. So if Itu Aba is judged as an island, what will we obtain? For example, we can have our own exclusive economic zone and continental shelf, which provide us the right of managing and exploiting the petroleum and fisheries resources. Besides, the fast development of People’s republic of China make the countries around east and south-east Asia. What steps People’s republic of China will take is concerned by those countries. Lastly, like Itu Aba, Okinotorisima of Japan also has the same problem about its legal status. How it will be judged is probably influenced by the case of Itu Aba. So Okinotorisima of Japan is an island or a rock,which is worth thinking deeply. No matter how it’s defined, the result will have a huge impact on the area of Asia and the Pacific Ocean.
Chiu, Chia-Lin, and 裘家麟. "The Status of the Permanent Court of Arbitration:With Special Reference to the South China Sea Arbitration." Thesis, 2018. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/26bg6s.
Full text國立中興大學
法律學系碩士在職專班
106
The South China Sea arbitral award rendered by the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) in Hague has raised so many controversies that in the end it was abandoned by both parties, namely, the Philippines and the People’s Republic of China. While the contents of the award deserve critical analyses, it is also interesting to know how this long forgotten Non United Nations organization operates and contributes to international society. This thesis intends to explore PCA with special reference to the South China Sea arbitration. Its history, structure and functions are briefly introduced. Some of the notable cases are also mentioned as a proof of its “achievements” since its establishment. Then an analysis and criticisms of the South China Sea case are provided to demonstrate why the People’s Republic of China refused to accept it. Nor was it considered a fair judgment on the part of the Republic of China. It is argued that the reasoning provided by PCA based on the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea was largely flawed and one-sided since it failed to consider the ever-advancing technological factor. As a result, it was not even regarded as a significant victory by the Philippines. This case also shows that PCA’s popularity is not just declining, but also an unfavorable means of resolving disputes.
Huang, Yung-Shiang, and 黃永翔. "A Study upon the Legal Status of the Taiping Island after the South China Sea Arbitration." Thesis, 2018. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/734qpt.
Full text國立臺灣海洋大學
海洋法律研究所
106
The South China Sea is rich in resources and located in the transportation hubs between the Pacific Ocean and the Indian Ocean. The neighboring countries all want to transfer the South China Sea into the territorial sea of their country. Philippines submitted the dispute to arbitration on the grounds of the Huang-yan Island, and it was accepted and heard by the arbitral tribunal. Since the arbitration judgment of the South China Sea Arbitration Case was announced, public opinions have been magnified to examine the interests of the country, and Taiwan generally believes that the arbitration tribunal should not accept the South China Sea arbitration case from the beginning. Even it is accepted, all evidences should be considered. Except that there is no actual understanding of the actual conditions of Taiping Island, the judgment is judged only by adopting one-sided statement of Philippines. Therefore, for understanding the deduction of arbitration judgment, this study resaerch Philippines’ claims and the South China Sea Arbitration Case's criteria for determining the island to know The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), Article 121 of the norms and history. This study is based on the historical facts of Taiping Island, and discussed with the regime of islands established in the 1982 "United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea", to observed its legislative reasons and analyzed the formation and definition of the island elements. After understanding the definition of islands, we will further explore the island’s rights to the seas and the island’s role, its influence, and various factors when it comes to the overlapping of maritime rights between countries. In accordance with the historical background and history of Article 121 of the 1982 UNCLOS, the South China Sea arbitration case was reviewed. However, Taiping Island is not a dispute point in the South China Sea arbitration case. The arbitral tribunal made a comprehensive interpretation in the arbitration judgment. In the judgment, Taiping Island was identified as a rock reef and could not enjoy the rights of exclusive economic sea areas and continental reefs. This arbitration judgment has seriously affected Taiwan’s right to exercise Taiping Island. What is the legal status of Taiping Island ? It mainly involves the concept of uncertainty in natural resources, navigational rights and island regime . On the legal level, the regime of islands has been clearly explained in the South China Sea arbitration case, which can clarify the issue of island controversy that has been controversial for a long time. On the political level, natural resources are related to the development of the country and the extension of sovereignty. Taiwan advocates the historical rights of the South China Sea. The sovereignty and legal status of the South China Sea resources and islands and reefs are of considerable legal and political significance to Taiwan. China also claims sovereignty with historic rights. After the South China Sea arbitration case was announced, The attitudes and circumstances with China, Philippines and other neighboring countries regarding the South China Sea arbitration case will affect the stability of the East Asia region. This study puts forward Taiwan’s practice on Taiping Island through the reaction and impact of the United States, the Philippines, and China on the South China Sea arbitration case.
Hong, Nong. "Law and Politics in the South China Sea: Assessing the Role of UNCLOS in Ocean Dispute Settlement." Phd thesis, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/10048/1104.
Full text陳希傑. "The assessment of the sovereign dispute and ROC's policy toward the south China sea an international law perspectives." Thesis, 2004. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/30458981939226759158.
Full textJiang, Shao-Yong, Tao Yang, Lu Ge, Jing-Hong Yang, Neng-You Wu, Jian Liu, Guang-Xue Zhang, and Dao-Hua Chen. "GEOCHEMICAL ANOMALY OF PORE WATERS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR GAS HYDRATE OCCURENCE IN THE SOUTH CHINA SEA." 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/2429/1079.
Full textYang, Shengxiong, Haiqi Zhang, Nengyou Wu, Xin Su, Peter Schultheiss, Melanie Holland, Guang-Xue Zhang, Jinqiang Liang, Jing'an Lu, and Kelly Rose. "HIGH CONCENTRATION HYDRATE IN DISSEMINATED FORMS OBTAINED IN SHENHU AREA, NORTH SLOPE OF SOUTH CHINA SEA." 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/2429/1178.
Full textWu, Nengyou, Shengxiong Yang, Haiqi Zhang, Jinqiang Liang, Hongbin Wang, Xin Su, and Shaoying Fu. "PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION ON GAS HYDRATE RESERVOIR SYSTEM OF SHENHU AREA, NORTH SLOPE OF SOUTH CHINA SEA." 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/2429/1177.
Full textVu, Hai Dang. "Towards a Network of Marine Protected Areas in the South China Sea: Legal and Political Perspectives." 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10222/31425.
Full textLAI, PIN-HUNG, and 賴秉鴻. "A Study on China’s Energy Security Strategy and International Cooperation - A Case Study of Energy Security in South China Sea." Thesis, 2017. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/fg75z8.
Full text國防大學政治作戰學院
政治研究所
105
China's energy security strategy is “Four Revolution, One Cooperation”, to promote energy consumption, supply, technology, institutional reform, and international cooperation. In order to solve the problems of overcapacity and excess foreign exchange in China, Xi Jinping, through the “One Belt One Road” initiative, strengthens the establishment of links with different countries in the areas of diplomacy, economic development, trade, military facilities and port infrastructure including projects such as Melaka Gateway, Djibouti port, Gwadar port and so on. These ports can be transformed into China’s relay stations for energy supply, with both military and commercial functions to help China control energy channels and maintain maritime safety. In recent years, the construction of the island reefs in South China Sea is another step to maintain the safety of China’s sea energy transport. In order to ensure the safety of oil supply, China has adopted a “diversified” layout to ensure its own oil supply stability, including the promotion of energy efficiency, the establishment of strategic oil reserves, the “going out” strategy to actively participate in foreign oil development Moreover, China aggressively seeks to establish energy supply channels on land, a blue-water ocean fleet, a double or multilateral dialogue mechanism, to lease foreign sea ports, and to sign energy cooperation protocols and other measures to protect its energy security.
Lin, Dai-Tze, and 林岱澤. "Examining CHEN Shui-bian''s Nansha Initiative in the South China Sea and its Future from an International Environmental Regime Perspective." Thesis, 2009. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/79722962834758434047.
Full text銘傳大學
國際事務研究所碩士班
97
In the South China Sea (SCS), there are many thorny problems for a long period of time, such as environmental protection, sovereignty, and so on. On February 2, 2008, CHEN Shui- bian’s government promoted the “Nansha Initiative” at Nansha Island Group/Spratlys, to promote environmental protection, as opposed to emphasizing the sovereignty issue. His intention is to urge each claimant of the SCS to cooperate with each other, so as to make sure that the environment over there can be sustained. He wanted the Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan to accept the spirit and principles of “Declaration on the Code of Conduct on the South China Sea,” while hoping that a world environmental organization can be set up, so as to resolve the SCS problems. However, in a globalizing world, the term, international regimes, which embraces at least 15 core elements/features can be regarded as the most important tool in the international governance of the SCS. Arguably, applying international regimes, as opposed to promoting CHEN’s “Nansha Initiative,” can help to resolve the problems in SCS, because each claimant can be benefited, whereas a world environmental organization can exclude the participation of the ROC.
Kruger, Melissa Chantel. "The end of the multifibre agreement : a case study of South Africa and China / Melissa Chantel Kruger." Thesis, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10394/10882.
Full textLLM (Import and Export Law), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2012
Liu, Chien-Chi, and 劉千綺. "The Sovereignty Claims and Exercises Between the People's Republic of China and Republic of China over Disputed Islands in the South China Sea -- Examined by the Principle of Effectivités of International Law." Thesis, 2012. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/46806897546811103748.
Full text國立清華大學
科技法律研究所
100
Abstract The South China Sea area, an important marine channel and strategic location, reserves abundant oil and natural resources. Therefore the surrounding countries, include People’s Republic of China, Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei and Republic of China(Taiwan), vie for the benefit from the area. Republic of China (Taiwan) claims that Nansha Islands (Spratly Islands), Shisha Islands (Paracel Islands), Chungsha Islands (Macclesfield Islands), Tungsha Islands (Pratas Islands), without a doubt fall under the sovereignty of the government of the Republic of China (Taiwan) in any aspect —history, geography or international law. The conflicts between South China Sea countries have been intense in recent years. In April 2012, a group of Chinese fishing men expelled by Philippine navy force and since then a standoff between People’s Republic of China and Philippine had been held. In June 2012, the tension between the two countries started to be dissolved after the two countries announced seasonal fishing bans. Events of alike happen recurrently in this area of dispute. In 2002, those dispute-related countries tried to solve the problem by signing the ASEAN-China Declaration of Conduct on the South China Sea. Despite the signing of the declaration the dispute cannot be easily solved due to conflicting interests. The above- mentioned standoff is one of the cases resulting from conflicting interests. Regarding the principle of the land dominates the sea, once the country owns sovereignty over disputed islands; the country can claim the right of its surrounding waters. In the recent international law cases concerning sovereignty over islands, including” Sovereignty over Pulau Ligitan and Pulau Sipadan “of year 2000, “Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea” of year 2007 and” Sovereignty over Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks and South Ledge” of year 2008, it can be inferred that the principle of Effectivités is one of the most important criteria applying to the cases. The Principle of Effectivités means that the sovereignty country exercise real and actual act of sovereignty bases on its sovereignty intention, which is the examination for court to identify the legitimation of ownership on disputed island. This study thoroughly focus on three case: “the Sovereignty over Pulau Ligitan and Pulau Sipadan”, “Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea” and “Sovereignty over Pedra Branca/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks and South Ledge”. The court opinions and criteria about the principle of Effectivités articulated in those cases are used for the comparisons of the acts of Peoples’ Republic of China and Republic of China(Taiwan), and the results of the comparisons are strong support for the advice about the solid sovereignty of our country on those islands.
TSENG, TZU-YIN, and 曾子茵. "The Study on International Treaties apply to Taiwan-a case study of Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea." Thesis, 2019. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/2un57b.
Full text國立高雄大學
法律學系碩士班
107
With the advent of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of the Sea(UNCLOS), the new generation of maritime order is still unable to effectively divide the South China Sea(SCS) region. The activities of countries around SCS are also based on the Convention to deal with their behaviors, in addition to the conflicts of interest arising from traditional fishing. The rich exploitation of submarine oil reserves has strengthened the motivation and determination of all countries, resulting in friction that has never stopped, whether economically or militarily. The regional international organizations in SCS, mainly based on the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), signed the "Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea"(DOC) in 2002, expecting to reduce friction and tension in the region, and reach a consensus among the ASEAN on the peaceful handling of the disputes in the SCS. However, there is no mandatory declaration, and it is still unable to resolve the dispute between China and the Philippines. The declaration of the SCS’s behavior will be negotiated for nearly 20 years. The South China Sea Code of Conduct(COC) will be a declaration of the SCS. The declaration on the behavior of the SCS, which was originally a consensus on the SCS affairs, was raised to a more binding COC among ASEAN member states, China intends to make ASEAN applicable to the application of this standard and to further limit the activities of third countries in the region, that is, may exclude regional member states. The entry of countries into the SCS for military activities has caused the United States, Japan and Australia to continue to pay attention. Taiwan has the sovereignty of Taiping Island and managed it effectively. Although it is not a member of the ASEAN and not a signatory to the declaration of the parties to the SCS, can Taiwan, as a main body of international law, enter ASEAN by participating in other international inter-group models? This thesis will focus on the key points of the DOC and the way in which domestic laws are formulated. From the perspective of international law, this study analyzes the evolution of the international law, the international law of the sea, the ASEAN on the issue of the SCS, and the legal exploration of the international law of China, U.S. and Taiwan against the SCS to help Taiwan in the future, the activities of the SCS have a solid foundation of international law.
Yang, Tao, Shao-Yong Jiang, Jing-Hong Yang, Lu Ge, Neng-You Wu, Guang-Xue Zhang, and Jian Liu. "COMPARISON OF CARBON ISOTOPIC COMPOSITIONS OF DISSOLVED INORGANIC CARBON (DIC) IN PORE WATERS IN TWO SITES OF THE SOUTH CHINA SEA AND SIGNIFICANCES FOR GAS HYDRATE OCCURENCE." 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/2429/1080.
Full textLin, Saulwood, Yee Cheng Lim, Chung-ho Wang, Yue-Gau Chen, Tsanyao Frank Yang, Yuanshuen Wang, San-Hsiung Chung, and Kuo-Ming Huang. "PAST AND PRESENT RECORDS OF GAS HYDRATE GEOCHEMICAL SIGNATURES IN A TERRIGENOUS MATERIALS DOMINATED ACTIVE MARGIN, SOUTHWEST OF TAIWAN." 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/2429/2291.
Full textDobkowska, Joanna. "ASEAN jako platforma realizacji interesów państw Azji Południowo- Wschodniej wobec Chińskiej Republiki Ludowej." Doctoral thesis, 2018. https://depotuw.ceon.pl/handle/item/2664.
Full textThe topic of the dissertation was the role of the Association of South-East Asian Nations (ASEAN) in advancing of its member states’ national interests in relation to People’s Republic of China (PRC). The main goal was to ascertain the correlation between a state’s membership in an international organization, and the fulfilment of its national interests, using the examples of ASEAN and the PRC. The main hypothesis predicted that ASEAN is not an effective means of advancing the national interests of its member states in relation to the PRC due to the fact that their interests are too diverse or even contradictory, which hinders forming possible coalitions within the Association. There is also no clear correlation between the relative significance of a state within ASEAN and the degree of fulfilment of its interests. However it will not cause the dissolution of ASEAN as its institutional support in relations with China is considered crucial by all members – even those whose particular interests are not promoted by the Association. To verify the main hypothesis, the topic was divided into two main questions. Firstly, to ascertain the particular interests of each member state of ASEAN in relation to China; secondly, to what degree the membership in ASEAN promotes or hinders the fulfilment of the aforementioned interests. To determine the member states’ interests, the author proposed a model of analysis based on the concept introduced by Ian Tsung-Yen Chen and Alan Hao Yang (2013) which refers to the balance of threat theory by Stephen Walt (1996) and the theory of expected economic gains by Dale Copeland (1996). The purpose of the proposed model was to analyse the members’ interests towards China based on their perception of threat and expected gains of the economic cooperation, acknowledging also the historical context. The model was used in ten case studies which allowed to determine perceptions, and then interests and preferences of each ASEAN member state. Furthermore, the author identified two key factors influencing the ability of a state to advance its interests within ASEAN, namely its relative significance within the organization and the decision-making process – specifically, the meta-regime of decision-making (the ASEAN Way). This allowed to identify the potential groups of interest within the Association, as well as to evaluate the effectiveness of ASEAN as a means of advancing the national interests. The evaluation was based on two case studies related to the main areas of the Association’s activity: international security (the case of the territorial dispute on the South China Sea) and economic cooperation (the case of ACFTA). The conclusions of the analysis allowed to confirm the main hypothesis. What is more, the differing preferences for utilization of ASEAN as a means of conducting foreign policy were identified as another crucial factor affecting the Association’s effectiveness. Nevertheless, according the prognoses based on the presented conclusions ASEAN will remain a central actor in the regional cooperation, as well as a vital tool of its member states foreign policy towards China.
Petrtýl, Martin. "Čína v globální a regionální politice v 21.století - geopolitický střet s Japonskem, Indií, USA, Ruskem a Evropou." Doctoral thesis, 2014. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-356368.
Full text