Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Soil-structure interaction / Journal articles

Journal articles on the topic 'Soil-structure interaction'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Soil-structure interaction.

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 29 July 2024

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Soil-structure interaction.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Kolaki, Aravind I., and Basavaraj M. Gudadappanavar. "Performance Based Analysis of Framed Structure Considering Soil Structure Interaction." Bonfring International Journal of Man Machine Interface 4, Special Issue (July 30, 2016): 106–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.9756/bijmmi.8165.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Pattanashetti, Prateek, and M. S. Bhandiwad. "Seismic Performance of Regular and Irregular Flat Slab Structure with Soil Structure Interaction." Bonfring International Journal of Man Machine Interface 4, Special Issue (July 30, 2016): 215–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.9756/bijmmi.8186.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Lou, Menglin, Huaifeng Wang, Xi Chen, and Yongmei Zhai. "Structure–soil–structure interaction: Literature review." Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 31, no. 12 (December 2011): 1724–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.07.008.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Trombetta, Nicholas W., H. Benjamin Mason, Tara C. Hutchinson, Joshua D. Zupan, Jonathan D. Bray, and Bruce L. Kutter. "Nonlinear Soil–Foundation–Structure and Structure–Soil–Structure Interaction: Engineering Demands." Journal of Structural Engineering 141, no. 7 (July 2015): 04014177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001127.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Roopa, M., H. Venugopal, Jayachandra Jayachandra, and Madeva Nagaral. "Soil Structure Interaction Analysis of a Single Layer Latticed Geodesic Dome." Indian Journal of Science and Technology 15, no. 7 (February 21, 2021): 292–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.17485/ijst/v15i7.35.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Simmonds, Sidney H., and David K. Playdon. "Modelling soil-structure interaction construction." Computers & Structures 28, no. 2 (January 1988): 283–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(88)90049-1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

K.G.S. "Modelling of soil-structure interaction." Computers and Geotechnics 9, no. 3 (January 1990): 236–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0266-352x(90)90017-p.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Finn, WD Liam, Bishnu H. Pandey, and Carlos E. Ventura. "Modeling soil-foundation-structure interaction." Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings 20 (November 22, 2011): 47–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tal.735.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Trombetta, Nicholas W., H. Benjamin Mason, Tara C. Hutchinson, Joshua D. Zupan, Jonathan D. Bray, and Bruce L. Kutter. "Nonlinear Soil–Foundation–Structure and Structure–Soil–Structure Interaction: Centrifuge Test Observations." Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 140, no. 5 (May 2014): 04013057. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0001074.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Wang, Huai-feng, Meng-lin Lou, Xi Chen, and Yong-mei Zhai. "Structure–soil–structure interaction between underground structure and ground structure." Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 54 (November 2013): 31–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.07.015.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Gharad, A. M., and R. S. Sonparote. "Soil Structure Interaction Analysis of Pipe-Rack Structure." i-manager's Journal on Structural Engineering 1, no. 4 (February 15, 2013): 19–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.26634/jste.1.4.2137.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Riaz, H. I. Mohamad, S. M. Maheshwarappa, and Dr J. K. Dattatreya. "Soil-Structure Interaction Effects by Different Soil on Seismic Response of Multi-Story Building on Raft Foundation." Bonfring International Journal of Man Machine Interface 4, Special Issue (July 30, 2016): 103–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.9756/bijmmi.8164.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Garbellini, Cristiano, and Lyesse Laloui. "Soil-structure interaction of surface footings." Computers and Geotechnics 134 (June 2021): 104103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104103.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Sidorov, Vitalii, and Anastasya Almakaeva. "Soil and structure interaction investigation features." IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 869 (July 10, 2020): 072013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/869/7/072013.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Daud, Khalida A. "Review on Soil-Structure Interaction Problems." IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 888 (August 1, 2020): 012015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/888/1/012015.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Crouse, C. B., and Jeff McGuire. "Energy Dissipation in Soil-Structure Interaction." Earthquake Spectra 17, no. 2 (May 2001): 235–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1193/1.1586174.

Full text

Abstract:

Energy dissipation as a means of reducing the seismic response of structures has become a popular topic among researchers and structural engineers who have developed and implemented devices, such as friction dampers, fluid dampers, and isolators, in the design or retrofit of structures. However, a natural source of energy dissipation is the interaction between a structure, its foundation, and the supporting soil medium. To account for this frequency-dependent energy dissipation in dynamic analysis based on modal superposition, relatively simple and practical systems-identification methods are presented to estimate the composite modal damping ratios for the significant modes of vibration. SSI experiments and analysis of simple theoretical models using this method have yielded relatively large modal damping ratios in certain situations for structures such as short to mid-rise buildings, short-span bridges, flat bottom fuel storage tanks, offshore concrete gravity platforms, nuclear power plant containments, and nuclear waste processing plants.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Wan, Shiuan, Chin‐Hsiung Loh, and Yi‐ Wen Chang. "Soil‐structure interaction for continuous bridges." Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers 23, no. 4 (June 2000): 439–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02533839.2000.9670564.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Wang, Shaomin, Bruce L. Kutter, M. Jacob Chacko, Daniel W. Wilson, Ross W. Boulanger, and Abbas Abghari. "Nonlinear Seismic Soil-Pile Structure Interaction." Earthquake Spectra 14, no. 2 (May 1998): 377–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1193/1.1586006.

Full text

Abstract:

Analytical design tools for evaluation of soil-pile-structure interaction during seismic events are evaluated and modified. Several implementations of the “Beam on Nonlinear Winkler Foundation” (BNWF) method were used to predict results of centrifuge model tests of single piles in a soft clay soil profile. This paper shows that calculations from these computer codes can be sensitive to the details of the arrangement of nonlinear springs and linear viscous dashpots. Placing the linear viscous dashpots (representing radiation damping in the far field) in series with the hysteretic component of the p-y elements (representing the nonlinear soil-pile response in the near field) is shown to be technically preferable to a parallel arrangement of the viscous and hysteretic damping components. Preliminary centrifuge data is reasonably modeled by the numerical calculations using this implementation of damping, but additional field or physical model data are needed to fully evaluate the reliability of BNWF procedures.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Ge, Qi, Feng Xiong, Lunwu Xie, Jiang Chen, and Minjiu Yu. "Dynamic interaction of soil – Structure cluster." Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 123 (August 2019): 16–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.04.020.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Kausel, Eduardo. "Early history of soil–structure interaction." Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 30, no. 9 (September 2010): 822–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.11.001.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Lee, Vincent W., and Hao Luo. "Anti-plane foundationless soil–structure interaction." Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 30, no. 11 (November 2010): 1329–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.06.005.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Kocak, Suleyman, and Yalcin Mengi. "A simple soil–structure interaction model." Applied Mathematical Modelling 24, no. 8-9 (July 2000): 607–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0307-904x(00)00006-8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Onu, G. "Equivalences in the soil-structure interaction." Computers & Structures 58, no. 2 (January 1996): 367–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(95)00129-5.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Kolar, V., and I. Nemec. "Efficient modelling of soil-structure interaction." International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts 26, no. 2 (March 1989): 86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(89)90294-5.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Krizek, Jaromir. "Soil–Structure Interaction of Integral Bridges." Structural Engineering International 21, no. 2 (May 2011): 169–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.2749/101686611x12994961034372.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Roller, Filip, and Jiri Studnicka. "Soil-Structure Interaction of Integral Bridges." IABSE Symposium Report 88, no. 6 (January 1, 2004): 194–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.2749/222137804796291386.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Abdullah, Ahmed, and Hany El Naggar. "Soil-structure interaction of integral abutments." Transportation Geotechnics 38 (January 2023): 100900. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2022.100900.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Avilés, Javier, and Luis E. Pérez-Rocha. "Soil-structure interaction in yielding systems." Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 32, no. 11 (June 18, 2003): 1749–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eqe.300.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

GUÉGUEN, PHILIPPE, and PIERRE-YVES BARD. "SOIL-STRUCTURE AND SOIL-STRUCTURE-SOIL INTERACTION: EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE AT THE VOLVI TEST SITE." Journal of Earthquake Engineering 9, no. 5 (September 2005): 657–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13632460509350561.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Bernat, S., and B. Cambou. "Soil-structure interaction in shield tunnelling in soft soil." Computers and Geotechnics 22, no. 3-4 (April 1998): 221–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0266-352x(98)00007-x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Elsamany, M., M. Abdel Razik, M. Kotb, and M. Gouda. "Soil-Structure Interaction of Tunnels in Soft Clay Soil." Egyptian Journal for Engineering Sciences and Technology 18, no. 3 (July 1, 2015): 1–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.21608/eijest.2015.97114.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Guo, Jie, Kunpeng Wang, Hongtao Liu, and Nan Zhang. "Influence of Water-Structure and Soil-Structure Interaction on Seismic Performance of Sea-Crossing Continuous Girder Bridge." Advances in Civil Engineering 2021 (December 7, 2021): 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/7215289.

Full text

Abstract:

Based on the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao project, considering the fluid-structure interaction and soil-structure interaction, the seismic response of a sea-crossing continuous girder bridge is analyzed. Three-dimensional nonlinear numerical bridge model is developed, in which the hydrodynamic force is represented by added mass and pile-soil interaction is represented by p-y elements. Meanwhile, stratification of soil is considered in the free field analysis. Through the comparison of responses of the bridge cases, the effects of earthquake-induced hydrodynamic force and pile-soil interaction are studied. For the influence of hydrodynamic force, the results show that it is relatively slight as compared with pile-soil interaction; moreover pile foundation is more sensitive to it than other bridge components. The influence of pile-soil interaction is relatively significant. When both of the interactions are considered, the influence is not a simple superposition of acting alone, so it is recommended to consider both factors in dynamic analysis.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Kirby, JM, and BG Blunden. "Interaction of soil deformations, structure and permeability." Soil Research 29, no. 6 (1991): 891. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/sr9910891.

Full text

Abstract:

Soil deformations, structure and permeability are linked in consistent and qualitatively predictable ways. The critical state concept of soil mechanics provides a useful framework for the description of deformations and the changes in structure and permeability in agricultural operations. Changes in structure are limited until yield (the onset of permanent deformation) occurs either in uniaxial compression or shear. Following yield, changes are more pronounced and may be expansive or compressive. Expansion during shear is accompanied by localised zones of aligned fabric, while compression during shear results in more general rearrangement of structure. Uniaxial compression and compression during shear both result in decreases to permeability. Expansion during shear leads to increases or decreases in permeability, depending on the initial structure. In all cases, shearing appears to cause a change in permeability towards a unique set of relationships among the stresses, void ratio and permeability. Quantitative predictions of changes in structure and permeability resulting from soil deformation cannot be made using current information. Systematic studies of the interaction between soil deformations and structure are required, together with further systematic studies of the interaction between soil deformations and permeability. The critical state concept suggests useful directions in which to explore these interactions.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Zhou, Wan, and Ming Chen. "Structure Seismic Response Analysis under Pile-Soil-Structure Interaction." Applied Mechanics and Materials 351-352 (August 2013): 954–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.351-352.954.

Full text

Abstract:

This paper makes a numerical simulation for a high-rise frame building with the basement by using the structural analysis program SAP2000. The seismic response of the building under interaction of pile-soil-structure (SSPI) is analyzed. A parametric study that involves evaluating the linear elastic seismic performance of eleven, thirteen and fifteen story buildings with one underground story, and buildings having one, two, three and four underground stories, and the influence of different soil stiffness was performed. It is found that the SSPI can greatly affect the seismic response of buildings in terms of the dynamic characteristics and deformation behavior. It is found that, for some of the cases considered, SSPI effects increase both the vibration period and horizontal displacement of the buildings. And some rules on seismic performance of buildings with the influence of parameter variation are summarized.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Wang, S., and G. Schmid. "Dynamic structure-soil-structure interaction by FEM and BEM." Computational Mechanics 9, no. 5 (1992): 347–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00370014.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Bolisetti, Chandrakanth, and Andrew S. Whittaker. "Numerical investigations of structure-soil-structure interaction in buildings." Engineering Structures 215 (July 2020): 110709. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110709.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Kanellopoulos, Constantinos, Peter Rangelow, Boris Jeremic, Ioannis Anastasopoulos, and Bozidar Stojadinovic. "Dynamic structure-soil-structure interaction for nuclear power plants." Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 181 (June 2024): 108631. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.108631.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Thakur, Bhairav, and Atul Desai. "Seismic Performance of Nuclear Reactor Structure Through Soil Structure Interaction." IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1326, no. 1 (June 1, 2024): 012039. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1326/1/012039.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract This study examines the seismic performance of nuclear containment structures on a layered fine sand to Hard rock. The research explores the intricate dynamics of nonlinear soil behaviour during earthquakes and its significant impact on soil-structure interactions. This analysis considers the inherent nonlinearity of the containment structure and the soil under various conditions, utilizing models such as the heterogeneous elastic soil model and heterogeneous mech mohr model. These models incorporate varying properties and are implemented using the FLAC3D software. Notably, the proportions of the heterogeneous soil model, silty clayey soil model, and dense sand soil model are 83.17%, 85.42%, and 25.93%, respectively. An interesting observation is that the silty clayey model exhibits a higher poisson’s ratio (0.42) than the Hard Rock Model (0.24), resulting in a lower vertical stress azz in the Silty Clayey Model. The study found that some soil models are more effective under certain loading conditions. This provides new insights into how to best apply these models for accurate soil-structure interaction (SSI) modelling. This enhanced understanding of the capabilities of different soil models under various conditions is valuable for future research and has significant implications for practical applications in geotechnical earthquake engineering, especially for the safety of nuclear structure in seismic-prone regions.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Ahmed, Mohd, Mahmoud H. Mohamed, Javed Mallick, and Mohd Abul Hasan. "3D-Analysis of Soil-Foundation-Structure Interaction in Layered Soil." Open Journal of Civil Engineering 04, no. 04 (2014): 373–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2014.44032.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Beskos, D. E. "Special issue on soil dynamics and dynamic soil-structure interaction." Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements 8, no. 4 (August 1991): 166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0955-7997(91)90009-i.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Lee, Yong-Jei, Tae-Jin Kim, and Feng Maria. "Foundation Modeling Considering the Soil-Structure Interaction." Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea 16, no. 3 (June 30, 2012): 13–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.5000/eesk.2012.16.3.013.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Stavridis, L. T. "Simplified Analysis of Layered Soil-Structure Interaction." Journal of Structural Engineering 128, no. 2 (February 2002): 224–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2002)128:2(224).

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Masia, Mark J., Peter W. Kleeman, and Robert E. Melchers. "Modeling Soil/Structure Interaction for Masonry Structures." Journal of Structural Engineering 130, no. 4 (April 2004): 641–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2004)130:4(641).

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Sultanov, K. S., B. E. Khusanov, and B. B. Rikhsieva. "Mathematical model of underground structure-soil interaction." IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 962 (November 18, 2020): 032021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/962/3/032021.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Noorzaei, J., M. N. Viladkar, and P. N. Godbole. "Nonlinear soil‐structure interaction in plane frames." Engineering Computations 11, no. 4 (April 1994): 303–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02644409410799308.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

MYLONAKIS, GEORGE, and GEORGE GAZETAS. "SEISMIC SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION: BENEFICIAL OR DETRIMENTAL?" Journal of Earthquake Engineering 4, no. 3 (July 2000): 277–301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13632460009350372.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Masih, Rusk. "Foundation Uniform Pressure and Soil‐Structure Interaction." Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 120, no. 11 (November 1994): 2064–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1994)120:11(2064).

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Li, K. S. "Foundation Uniform Pressure and Soil-Structure Interaction." Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 121, no. 12 (December 1995): 912. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1995)121:12(912).

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Humar, J. L., A. Bagchi, and H. Xia. "Frequency domain analysis of soil-structure interaction." Computers & Structures 66, no. 2-3 (January 1998): 337–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0045-7949(97)00068-0.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Romero, A., M. Solís, J. Domínguez, and P. Galvín. "Soil–structure interaction in resonant railway bridges." Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 47 (April 2013): 108–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.07.014.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!