Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Soil-structure interaction

Academic literature on the topic 'Soil-structure interaction'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 29 July 2024

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Contents

Journal articles
Dissertations / Theses
Books
Book chapters
Conference papers
Reports

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Soil-structure interaction.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Soil-structure interaction"

1

Kolaki, Aravind I., and Basavaraj M. Gudadappanavar. "Performance Based Analysis of Framed Structure Considering Soil Structure Interaction." Bonfring International Journal of Man Machine Interface 4, Special Issue (July 30, 2016): 106–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.9756/bijmmi.8165.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Pattanashetti, Prateek, and M. S. Bhandiwad. "Seismic Performance of Regular and Irregular Flat Slab Structure with Soil Structure Interaction." Bonfring International Journal of Man Machine Interface 4, Special Issue (July 30, 2016): 215–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.9756/bijmmi.8186.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Lou, Menglin, Huaifeng Wang, Xi Chen, and Yongmei Zhai. "Structure–soil–structure interaction: Literature review." Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 31, no. 12 (December 2011): 1724–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.07.008.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Trombetta, Nicholas W., H. Benjamin Mason, Tara C. Hutchinson, Joshua D. Zupan, Jonathan D. Bray, and Bruce L. Kutter. "Nonlinear Soil–Foundation–Structure and Structure–Soil–Structure Interaction: Engineering Demands." Journal of Structural Engineering 141, no. 7 (July 2015): 04014177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001127.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Roopa, M., H. Venugopal, Jayachandra Jayachandra, and Madeva Nagaral. "Soil Structure Interaction Analysis of a Single Layer Latticed Geodesic Dome." Indian Journal of Science and Technology 15, no. 7 (February 21, 2021): 292–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.17485/ijst/v15i7.35.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Simmonds, Sidney H., and David K. Playdon. "Modelling soil-structure interaction construction." Computers & Structures 28, no. 2 (January 1988): 283–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(88)90049-1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

K.G.S. "Modelling of soil-structure interaction." Computers and Geotechnics 9, no. 3 (January 1990): 236–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0266-352x(90)90017-p.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Finn, WD Liam, Bishnu H. Pandey, and Carlos E. Ventura. "Modeling soil-foundation-structure interaction." Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings 20 (November 22, 2011): 47–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tal.735.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Trombetta, Nicholas W., H. Benjamin Mason, Tara C. Hutchinson, Joshua D. Zupan, Jonathan D. Bray, and Bruce L. Kutter. "Nonlinear Soil–Foundation–Structure and Structure–Soil–Structure Interaction: Centrifuge Test Observations." Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 140, no. 5 (May 2014): 04013057. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0001074.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Wang, Huai-feng, Meng-lin Lou, Xi Chen, and Yong-mei Zhai. "Structure–soil–structure interaction between underground structure and ground structure." Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 54 (November 2013): 31–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.07.015.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Soil-structure interaction"

1

Warnakulasuriya, Hapuhennedige Surangith. "Soil structure interaction of buried pipes." Thesis, University of East London, 1999. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.286607.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Lees, Andrew Steven. "Soil/structure interaction of temporary roadways." Thesis, University of Southampton, 2000. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.324808.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Fairfield, Charles Alexander. "Soil-structure interaction in arch bridges." Thesis, University of Edinburgh, 1994. http://hdl.handle.net/1842/13809.

Full text

Abstract:

European Community directives now insist upon the imposition of 11.5t axle weights for the assessment of highway bridges and structures. This need for heavier loads arises from the Community wide harmonisation of transport policy. Its successful implementation requires the urgent assessment of our bridge stock of some 75000 masonry arches. The analysis of arch bridges has long lacked an accurate method of assessing the loads transmitted to the arch ring by the surrounding soil. This thesis proposes pressure distributions suitable for use in the analysis of arch bridges. It examines, by way of instrumented small scale and in-situ tests, the soil-structure interaction effects arising from the backfill material. Observations of zones of soil displacement around a loaded arch are made in order to better describe the interactive effects. A finite element analysis of the instrumented tests was done and a parametric study was used to assess the effects of various material properties upon the system's behaviour. The inclusion of the interactive effects observed, and modelled, intends to lead to cost savings in the arch bridge assessment programme by reducing the conservatism inherent in the most common assessment methods. Design curves incorporating soil-structure interaction effects are presented where significant capacity increases can be seen compared with analyses ignoring the effects.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Taherzadeh, Reza. "Seismic soil-pile group-structure interaction." Châtenay-Malabry, Ecole centrale de Paris, 2008. http://www.theses.fr/2008ECAP1096.

Full text

Abstract:

Si la prise en compte de l'interaction sol-structure peut être abordée de façon relativement simple dans la plupart des fondations superficielles, il n'en est pas de même pour des groupes de pieux. Les principales difficultés rencontrées sont liées à la complexité et à la taille du modèle numérique nécessaire à l’analyse détaillée. Cette thèse porte sur la modélisation de l’interaction dynamique sol-structure dans le cas particulier des fondations comportant un grand nombre de pieux. Ce travail consiste à faire des modélisations avancées en utilisant un couplage entre le logiciel MISS3D d’éléments de frontière pour des milieux élastiques stratifiés et la toolbox matlab d’éléments finis SDT pour la modélisation des fondations et des structures. Après avoir validé la modélisation à partir de solutions de la littérature, les principaux paramètres gouvernant l’impédance de ces fondations ont été mis en évidence. Les modèles simplifiés de ces impédances ont ensuite été développés dans le cas de pieux flottants ou de pieux encastrés dans un bedrock. Des paramètres de ces modèles simplifiés ont été déterminés par des analyses statistiques fondées sur une base étendue de modèles numériques couvrant une large gamme de situations pratiques. Ces modèles approchés ont été validés sur des cas particuliers, puis différents spectres de réponse modifiés par la prise en compte de l’interaction sol-structure ont été proposés
Despite the significant progress in simple engineering design of surface footing with considering the soil-structure interaction (SSI), there is still a need of the same procedure for the pile group foundation. The main approach to solve this strongly coupled problem is the use of full numerical models, taking into account the soil and the piles with equal rigor. This is however a computationally very demanding approach, in particular for large numbers of piles. The originality of this thesis is using an advanced numerical method with coupling the existing software MISS3D based on boundary element (BE), green's function for the stratified infinite visco-elastic soil and the matlab toolbox SDT based on finite element (FE) method to modeling the foundation and the superstructure. After the validation of this numerical approach with the other numerical results published in the literature, the leading parameters affecting the impedance and the kinematic interaction have been identified. Simple formulations have then been derived for the dynamic stiffness matrices of pile groups foundation subjected to horizontal and rocking dynamic loads for both floating piles in homogeneous half-space and end-bearing piles. These formulations were found using a large data base of impedance matrix computed by numerical FE-BE model. These simple approaches have been validated in a practical case. A modified spectral response is then proposed with considering the soil-structure interaction effect

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Ritter, Stefan. "Experiments in tunnel-soil-structure interaction." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 2018. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/273891.

Full text

Abstract:

Urbanisation will require significant expansion of underground infrastructure, which results in unavoidable ground displacements that affect the built environment. Predicting the interaction between a tunnel, the soil and existing structures remains an engineering challenge due to the highly non-linear behaviour of both the soil and the building. This thesis investigates the interaction between a surface structure and tunnelling-induced ground displacements. Specifically, novel three-dimensionally printed building models with brittle material behaviour, similar to masonry, were developed and tested in a geotechnical centrifuge. This enabled replication of building models with representative global stiffness values and realistic building features including strip footings, intermediate walls, a rough soil-structure interface, building layouts and façade openings. By varying building characteristics, the impact of structural features on both the soil and building response to tunnelling in dense sand was investigated. Results illustrate that the presence of surface structures considerably altered the tunnelling-induced soil response. The building-to-tunnel position notably influences the magnitude of soil displacements and causes localised phenomena such as embedment of building corners. An increase of the façade opening area and building length reduces the alteration of the theoretical greenfield settlements, in particular the trough width. Moreover, the impact of varying the building layout is discussed in detail. For several building-tunnel scenarios, building distortions are quantified and the crucial role of building features is demonstrated. Structures spanning the greenfield inflection point experienced more deformation than identical structures positioned in either sagging or hogging, and partitioning a structure either side of the greenfield inflection point is shown to lead to unconservative damage assessments. Results also quantify the significant extent to which structural distortions increase as façade openings and building length increases. Observed building damage and cracking patterns confirm the reported trends. The experimental results are used to evaluate the performance of available methods to assess the behaviour of buildings to tunnelling. Predictions ignoring soil-structure interaction are usually overly conservative, while approaches based on the relative stiffness of a structure and the soil result in inconsistent predictions, though some methods performed better than others. Practical improvements to consider structural details when assessing this tunnel-soil-structure system are finally proposed.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Gandomzadeh, Ali. "Dynamic soil-structure interaction : effect of nonlinear soil behavior." Phd thesis, Université Paris-Est, 2011. http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00648179.

Full text

Abstract:

The interaction of the soil with the structure has been largely explored the assumption of material and geometrical linearity of the soil. Nevertheless, for moderate or strong seismic events, the maximum shear strain can easily reach the elastic limit of the soil behavior. Considering soil-structure interaction, the nonlinear effects may change the soil stiffness at the base of the structure and therefore energy dissipation into the soil. Consequently, ignoring the nonlinear characteristics of the dynamic soil-structure interaction (DSSI) this phenomenon could lead toerroneous predictions of structural response. The goal of this work is to implement a fully nonlinear constitutive model for soils into anumerical code in order to investigate the effect of soil nonlinearity on dynamic soil structureinteraction. Moreover, different issues are taken into account such as the effect of confining stress on the shear modulus of the soil, initial static condition, contact elements in the soil-structure interface, etc. During this work, a simple absorbing layer method based on a Rayleigh / Caughey damping formulation, which is often already available in existing. Finite Element softwares, is also presented. The stability conditions of the wave propagation problems are studied and it is shown that the linear and nonlinear behavior are very different when dealing with numerical dispersion. It is shown that the 10 points per wavelength rule, recommended in the literature for the elastic media is not sufficient for the nonlinear case. The implemented model is first numerically verified by comparing the results with other known numerical codes. Afterward, a parametric study is carried out for different types of structures and various soil profiles to characterize nonlinear effects. Different features of the DSSI are compared to the linear case : modification of the amplitude and frequency content of the waves propagated into the soil, fundamental frequency, energy dissipation in the soil and the response of the soil-structure system. Through these parametric studies we show that depending on the soil properties, frequency content of the soil response could change significantly due to the soil nonlinearity. The peaks of the transfer function between free field and outcropping responsesshift to lower frequencies and amplification happens at this frequency range. Amplificationreduction for the high frequencies and even deamplication may happen for high level inputmotions. These changes influence the structural response.We show that depending on the combination of the fundamental frequency of the structureand the the natural frequency of the soil, the effect of soil-structure interaction could be significant or negligible. However, the effect of structure weight and rocking of the superstructurecould change the results. Finally, the basin of Nice is used as an example of wave propagation ona heterogeneous nonlinear media and dynamic soil-structure interaction. The basin response isstrongly dependent on the combination of soil nonlinearity, topographic effects and impedancecontrast between soil layers. For the selected structures and soil profiles of this work, the performed numerical simulations show that the shift of the fundamental frequency is not a goodindex to discriminate linear from nonlinear soil behavior

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Yogendrakumar, Muthucumarasamy. "Dynamic soil-structure interaction : theory and verification." Thesis, University of British Columbia, 1988. http://hdl.handle.net/2429/29222.

Full text

Abstract:

A nonlinear effective stress method of analysis for determining the static and dynamic response of 2-D embankments and soil-structure interaction systems is presented. The method of analysis is incorporated in the computer program TARA-3. The constitutive model in TARA-3 is expressed as a sum of a shear stress model and a normal stress model. The behavior in shear is assumed to be nonlinear and hysteretic, exhibiting Masing behavior under unloading and reloading. The response of the soil to uniform all round pressure is assumed to nonlinearly elastic and dependent on the mean normal effective stresses. The porewater pressures required in the dynamic effective stress method of analysis are obtained by the Martin-Finn-Seed porewater pressure generation model modified to include the effect of initial static shear. During dynamic analysis, the effective stress regime and consequently the soil properties are modified for the effect of seismically induced porewater pressures. A very attractive feature of TARA-3 is that all the parameters required for an analysis may be obtained from conventional geotechnical engineering tests either in-situ or in laboratory. A novel feature of the program is that the dynamic analysis can be conducted starting from the static stress-strain condition which leads to accumulating permanent deformations in the direction of the smallest residual resistance to deformation. The program can also start the dynamic analysis from a zero stress-zero strain condition as is done conventionally in engineering practice. The program includes an energy transmitting base and lateral energy transmitting boundaries to simulate the radiation of energy which occurs in the field. The program predicts accelerations, porewater pressures, instantaneous dynamic deformations, permanent deformations due to the hysteretic stress-strain response, deformations due to gravity acting on the softening soil and deformations due to consolidation as the seismic porewater pressures dissipate. The capability of TARA-3 to model the response of soil structures and soil-structure interaction systems during earthquakes has been validated using data from simulated earthquake tests on a variety of centrifuged models conducted on the large geotechnical centrifuge at Cambridge University in the United Kingdom. The data base includes acceleration time histories, porewater pressure time histories and deformations at many locations within the models. The program was able to successfully simulate acceleration and porewater pressure time histories and residual deformations in the models. The validation program suggests that TARA-3 is an efficient and reliable program for the nonlinear effective stress analysis of many important problems in geotechnical engineering for which 2-D plane strain representation is adequate.
Applied Science, Faculty of
Civil Engineering, Department of
Graduate

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Sun, Hepn Wing. "Ground deformation mechanisms for soil-structure interaction." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 1990. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.303931.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

David, Thevaneyan Krishta David. "Integral bridges: modelling the soil-structure interaction." Thesis, University of Leeds, 2012. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.581881.

Full text

Abstract:

Integral abutment bridges, also known as integral bridges, have become one of the most common types of joint-less bridge construction, certainly over the last three decades. Their principal advantages are derived from the elimination of expansion joints and bearings, making them a very cost-effective system in terms of construction, maintenance, and longevity. The elimination of joints from bridges creates a significant soil-structure interaction behind the abutment and the piles generating an interesting problem since the response of the different elements of the integral bridge are interdependent. This research project used numerical analyses to investigate the complex interactions that exist between the structural components of the stub-type integral abutment bridge and the backfill soil. Where possible, these results were validated with existing field data. A literature review was conducted to gain an insight into the behaviour of integral abutment bridges, particularly the soil-structure interaction of integral bridges. To gain a better understanding of the behaviour of integral abutment bridges and their interaction with the backfill soil adjacent to the abutment and the piles, particularly due to thermally induced movement/loads, a 2D finite element analysis was performed on a typical integral abutment bridge using OASYS GSA and OASYS SAFE. The results from this research are believed to help answer two of the most debated issues with respect to stub-type integral abutment bridge-soil interaction analyses. Firstly, it is clear, and now possible, that a reliably accurate soil profile is used in the analysis/design. The Mohr-Coulomb soil model was found to realistically represent the soil behaviour. Secondly, the research may suggest that cyclic movements / loads may not significantly influence the overall behaviour of integral abutment bridges. In addition, it was found that the development of earth pressure behind the integral abutment is significantly affected by the backfill soil properties and is a function of the integral abutment displacement. Limiting values for the abutment displacement, which induces maximum backfill pressure, have been suggested. The soil separation phenomenon (gapping) was also found to significantly affect the backfill/foundation soil-load relationship behaviour. Implications· of this research for practising engineers and recommendations for future research work are also included.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Dewsbury, Jonathan J. "Numerical modelling of soil-pile-structure interaction." Thesis, University of Southampton, 2012. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.582152.

Full text

Abstract:

Soil-pile-structure interaction analysis is the simultaneous consideration of the structural frame, pile foundations, and the soil forming the founding material. Failure to consider soil-pile-structure interaction in design will lead to a poor prediction of load distribution within the structure. A poor prediction of load distribution will cause the structure to deform under loads that have not been calculated for. This may result in the structure cracking or the overstressing of columns. If the actual load distribution significantly differs from that designed for, the factor of safety on structural elements may be substantially decreased. Despite the importance, there are currently no studies quantifying the effect of soil-pile-structure interaction for simple office structures. As a result the effects of soil-pile-structure interaction are often deemed unimportant, and ignored in the design of simple structures. Numerical methods are often relied upon to consider soil-pile-structure interaction for complex structures, such as tall towers. However in their current form they are limited because the meshes required for analysis, especially when in three dimensions, are difficult to verify, and take a long time to set up and run. Therefore this thesis proposes a meshing method within the framework of the finite element method that allows large, complex, and non-symmetrical pile foundation layouts to be meshed in a manner that is quick, can be easily checked, and significantly reduces the analysis run time. Application of the meshing method to an office structure (recently designed for the 2012 Olympic Games) has allowed the effects of soil-pile-structure interaction to be quantified. The subsequent normalisation of the results provides a method for assessing when it is necessary to consider soil- pile-structure interaction in future design. Comparison between the monitored performance of 'The Landmark' (a 330m tower founded on a piled raft) and numerical predictions have demonstrated the importance of correct ground stiffness selection for achieving accurate predictions of piled raft settlement, and load distribution. The role of single pile load tests and in situ testing for ground stiffness selection for piled raft design has also been assessed

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

Books on the topic "Soil-structure interaction"

1

BULL, JOHN W. SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION. Abingdon, UK: Taylor & Francis, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203474891.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

S, Cakmak A., ed. Soil-structure interaction. Amsterdam: Elsevier, co-published with Computational Mechanics, 1987.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

S, Cakmak A., and International Conference on Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (3rd : 1987 : Princeton University), eds. Soil-structure interaction. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1987.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

S, Cakmak A., ed. Soil-structure interaction. Amsterdam: Elsevier, co-published with Computational Mechanics, 1987.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

National Research Council (U.S.). Transportation Research Board., ed. Soil-structure interaction. Washington, D.C: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, 1987.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Nawawi, Chouw, and Pender Michael J, eds. Soil-Foundation-Structure Interaction. Abingdon: CRC Press [Imprint], 2010.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Kolář, Vladimír. Modelling of soil-structure interaction. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1989.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Lazebnik, George E., and Gregory P. Tsinker, eds. Monitoring of Soil-Structure Interaction. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5979-5.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Kolář, Vladimír. Modelling of soil-structure interaction. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1989.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Warnakulsuriya, Hapuhennedige Surangith. Soil structure interaction of buried pipes. London: University of East London, 1999.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Soil-structure interaction"

1

Vrettos, Christos. "Soil-Structure Interaction." In Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering, 1–16. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36197-5_141-1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Jia, Junbo. "Soil–Structure Interaction." In Soil Dynamics and Foundation Modeling, 177–90. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40358-8_5.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Vrettos, Christos. "Soil-Structure Interaction." In Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering, 3315–27. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35344-4_141.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Saouma, Victor E., and M. Amin Hariri-Ardebili. "Soil Structure Interaction." In Aging, Shaking, and Cracking of Infrastructures, 353–79. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57434-5_15.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Vaziri, Mohsen. "Soil–Structure Interaction." In Structural Design of Buildings: Holistic Design, 105–36. Leeds: Emerald Publishing Limited, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/978-1-83549-560-520241006.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Young, R. J., A. N. Campbell, and P. A. Merriman. "Structure-soil-structure interaction studies." In Seismic Design Practice into the Next Century, 205–12. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9780203740026-28.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Young, R. J., A. N. Campbell, and P. A. Merriman. "Structure-soil-structure interaction studies." In Seismic Design Practice into the Next Century, 205–12. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9780203740026-28.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Gicev, Vlado. "Soil-Structure Interaction in Nonlinear Soil." In Coupled Site and Soil-Structure Interaction Effects with Application to Seismic Risk Mitigation, 151–68. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2697-2_12.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Aubry, Denis. "Computational Soil Dynamics and Soil-Structure Interaction." In Developments in Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction, 43–60. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1755-5_3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Papagiannakis, A. T., S. Bin-Shafique, and R. L. Lytton. "Retaining Structure-Unsaturated Soil Interaction." In Unsaturated Soils: Research and Applications, 269–74. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31343-1_34.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Soil-structure interaction"

1

Malhotra, S. "Soil-Pile Structure Interaction during Earthquakes." In GeoTrans 2004. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/40744(154)28.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Goodson, Mary W., and John E. Anderson. "Soil-Structure Interaction — a Case Study." In Structures Congress 2005. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/40753(171)94.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Poudel, Prabin, Abdelaziz Ads, and Magued Iskander. "Soil-Structure Interaction of Underreamed Piles." In International Foundations Congress and Equipment Expo 2021. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/9780784483404.030.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Dulam, Gangadhara Tilak, and R. Sundaravadivelu. "Seismic Analysis Considering Soil-Structure Interaction." In ASME 2004 23rd International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. ASMEDC, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/omae2004-51269.

Full text

Abstract:

The case study on LNG storage tank, Inchon, Korea which is supported by pile foundation system is carried out using Abaqus. The dynamic analysis is carried out on a single pile of this storage tank varying the ground accelerations, as 0.08g, 0.18g, 0.28g and 0.38g and maintaining the duration constant as 25 s. The spectral acceleration at the different levels of the piles are used to obtain the transfer function which is the ratio of spectral acceleration of the pile to ground acceleration. This paper will present the seismic response of single pile subjected to an earthquake at its bottom.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

"Soil-Structure Interaction--A Brief Overview." In SP-127: Earthquake-Resistant Concrete Structures--Inelastic Response and Design. American Concrete Institute, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.14359/3016.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Broc, Daniel. "Soil-Structure Interaction: Theoretical and Experimental Results." In ASME 2006 Pressure Vessels and Piping/ICPVT-11 Conference. ASMEDC, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/pvp2006-icpvt-11-93155.

Full text

Abstract:

In the study of the seismic behaviour of structures, the Soil Structure Interaction (SSI) is concerned with the interaction between the soil, from which come the solicitation, and the structure (building, industrial installation, ...). The SSI can be considered as a kind of multi physic problem. The physical phenomena for the soil or the structure are described by the same equations. But, for the soil, the best point of view is to consider wave’s propagation in an infinite medium, whereas for the structure, the most suitable approach is, in many case, to use eigen modes on the modal basis. The currently used numerical methods for SSI consider two different domains, with interactions at the interface. Boundary Element Methods (BEM) and Finite Element Methods (FEM) can be used. An application is presented, with the interpretation of test performed in Japan, for a Structure Soil Structure Interaction (SSSI) problem, considering the interactions between two adjacent buildings during an earthquake. The tests were performed by JNES in Japan, and the interpretations presented here are performed by CEA, in France, using FEM methods. The field test experiments have been carried out by NUPEC (JNES) under different conditions with one building, two identical buildings or two different buildings in an excavation, for the “surface configuration”, and in the “embedded configuration”, when the excavation is filled. Forced vibration test and earthquake observations are being carried out in the field test. NUPEC proposed a theoretical model for the interpretation of the experimental results, including soil and buildings mechanical characteristics. The results obtained with this model are similar to the experimental ones. Sensibility analyses have been developed, based on the NUPEC theoretical model, for the forced vibration tests and the seismic motion. It is possible to reproduce, with numerical simulations, the fact that, for two buildings, the movement under a seismic solicitation is a little lower for two adjacent buildings than for one isolated building.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Touhami, Sara, Vinicius Alves Fernandes, and Fernando Lopez Caballero. "STRUCTURE-SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION ANALYSIS OF NUPEC TEST CASES." In 6th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. Athens: Institute of Structural Analysis and Antiseismic Research School of Civil Engineering National Technical University of Athens (NTUA) Greece, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.7712/120117.5574.18174.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Ham, Soo-Min, Alexandra Camille San Pablo, Jose Luis Caisapanta, and Jason DeJong. "Centrifuge Modeling of Soil-Structure Interaction with MICP Improved Soil." In Geo-Congress 2024. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/9780784485330.010.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

El Naggar, Hany. "Soil-Structure Interaction of Steel Pipe Culverts." In The World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering. Avestia Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.11159/icgre16.2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Yang, Han, Yuan Feng, Sumeet K. Sinha, Hexiang Wang, and Boris Jeremić. "Energy Dissipation in Soil Structure Interaction System." In Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics V. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/9780784481479.015.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Reports on the topic "Soil-structure interaction"

1

Miller, C., C. Costantino, A. Philippacopoulos, and M. Reich. Verification of soil-structure interaction methods. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), May 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/5507213.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Costantino, C., and A. Philippacopoulos. Influence of ground water on soil-structure interaction. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), December 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/5529456.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Philippacopoulos, A. Soil-structure interaction. Volume 1. Influence of layering. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), April 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/5825767.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Costantino, C. Soil-structure interaction. Volume 3. Influence of ground water. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), April 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/5646537.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Spears, Robert Edward, and Justin Leigh Coleman. Nonlinear Time Domain Seismic Soil-Structure Interaction (SSI) Deep Soil Site Methodology Development. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), September 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1371516.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Bolisetti, Chandu, Justin Coleman, Mohamed Talaat, and Philip Hashimoto. Advanced Seismic Fragility Modeling using Nonlinear Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), September 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1371513.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Bolisetti, Chandu, Justin Coleman, Mohamed Talaat, Philip Hashimoto, and Bentley Harwood. Advanced Seismic Fragility Modeling using Nonlinear Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), September 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1567702.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Tong, C. Quantifying uncertainties of a Soil-Foundation Structure-Interaction System under Seismic Excitation. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), April 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/928557.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Tehrani, Payman, Natalie Doulgerakis, Iman Talebinejad, Benjamin Kosbab, Michael Cohen, and Andrew Whittaker. Software Verification and Validation Guidelines for Non-Linear Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), November 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1831343.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Nie J., Braverman J., and M. Costantino. Seismic Soil-Structure Interaction Analyses of a Deeply Embedded Model Reactor ? SASSI Analyses. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), October 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1097517.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!