Academic literature on the topic 'Software systems'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Software systems.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Software systems"
Spinellis, Diomidis. "Systems Software." IEEE Software 30, no. 3 (May 2013): 18–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ms.2013.61.
Full textSilva, Dilma M. da, and Fabio Kon. "Adaptive software systems." Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society 10, no. 1 (July 2004): 3–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0104-65002004000200001.
Full textEbert, Christof, Divith Bajaj, and Michael Weyrich. "Testing Software Systems." IEEE Software 39, no. 4 (July 2022): 8–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ms.2022.3166755.
Full textVogelsang, Andreas. "Explainable software systems." it - Information Technology 61, no. 4 (August 27, 2019): 193–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/itit-2019-0015.
Full textSuhler, P. A., N. Bagherzadeh, M. Malek, and N. Iscoe. "Software Authorization Systems." IEEE Software 3, no. 5 (September 1986): 34–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ms.1986.234396.
Full textDel Ra, William. "Software systems architecture." ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 37, no. 2 (April 3, 2012): 36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2108144.2108171.
Full textBecker, Steffen, Wilhelm Hasselbring, Alexandra Paul, Marko Boskovic, Heiko Koziolek, Jan Ploski, Abhishek Dhama, et al. "Trustworthy software systems." ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 31, no. 6 (November 2006): 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1218776.1218781.
Full textDel Ra, William. "Software build systems." ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 36, no. 4 (August 4, 2011): 33–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1988997.1989005.
Full textJones, Russell. "Supporting systems software." Data Processing 27, no. 5 (June 1985): 19–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0011-684x(85)90131-5.
Full textda Silva, Dilma M., and Fabio Kon. "Adaptive software systems." Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society 10, no. 1 (February 2004): 3–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf03192349.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Software systems"
Rodrigues, Filho Roberto Vito. "Emergent software systems." Thesis, Lancaster University, 2018. http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/126944/.
Full textNasir, Muhammad-Iftikhar, and Rizwan Iqbal. "Evolvability of Software Systems." Thesis, Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, Avdelningen för programvarusystem, 2008. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:bth-4053.
Full textSoftware evolvability plays an important role in the software life cycle. It is ease with which software system can be modified for future requirements. There are different methods for assessing the software evolvability. Mainly, structural measures; expert assessment and combined approach. Structural approach focus on the class level measures i.e. inheritance, modularity, coupling etc. Whereas, the expert assessment approach utilizes experts opinion regarding the software system i.e. how much it is evolvable? Combined approach is a combination of structural measures and expert assessment. According to David E. Peercy software evolvability depends upon six factors i.e. modularity, descriptiveness, consistency, simplicity, expandability and instrumentation. However, David A. Sunday considered five factors which are modularity, descriptiveness, consistency, testability and changeability. Moreover, there are other factors which also influence the software evolvability i.e. skills and qualification of the maintainer, organizational support to evolvability and characteristics of the methods being used for maintenance. The importance of research methodology can't be neglected because it gives us thought about our research before start. It has a positive impact on research. We are able to understand the structure of our work and have rough idea about research procedure. Our research methodology on theme evolvability of software systems is consistent of few steps. These steps are literature review, informal discussions and then development of a questionnaire. Subsequently questionnaire is distributed to the subjects and conclusions are drawn, based on their feedback and analysis of results. We visited different software houses and discussed all the factors related to the survey. Experienced and qualified professionals were selected as subjects. To get the survey feedback we made phone calls, email reminders and personal meetings. Which result in high survey response i.e. 75%. Questionnaire was designed into three parts namely as personal information, characteristics of software evolvability and qualifications required for an expert. Pre-test was also designed to assure that the questions for the survey were properly defined and participants had no difficulty in understanding them. Participants of the survey included software developers, team leads, software testers and research students. Special consideration was given to the ethical issues in design and conduction of survey. We discussed about the response behavior of the participants analysis of the data we collected from survey. Analysis was conducted by different means like standard deviation, mean, medium, mode and variance in survey results. First part of the analysis is about what characteristics of the software which effect software evolvability and their priority. In this part we concluded that there are total eleven characteristics of the software evolvability out of which design and architecture is highly prioritized while technical platform and comments are least prioritized characteristics. In the second part of the analysis we concluded that technical training and quality assurance management experience are most important criteria for an expert while development experience and testing experience is least important In the last part of the thesis we discussed the research work, validity assessment of results and answers to the questions. We used A Lincoln‘s and Cuba’s criterion for validation assessment to support the validity of results. Validity is judged by four aspects credibility, transferability, dependability and conformability.
Jong, Hayco Alexander de. "Flexible heterogeneous software systems." [S.l : Amsterdam : s.n.] ; Universiteit van Amsterdam [Host], 2007. http://dare.uva.nl/document/39606.
Full textCaffall, Dale Scott. "Developing dependable software for a system-of-systems." Diss., Monterey, Calif. : Springfield, Va. : Naval Postgraduate School ; Available from National Technical Information Service, 2005. http://library.nps.navy.mil/uhtbin/hyperion/05Mar%5FCaffall.pdf.
Full textCaffall, Dale Scott. "Conceptual framework approach for system-of-systems software developments." Thesis, Monterey, Calif. : Springfield, Va. : Naval Postgraduate School ; Available from National Technical Information Service, 2003. http://library.nps.navy.mil/uhtbin/hyperion-image/03Mar%5FCaffall.pdf.
Full textThesis advisor(s): James Bret Michael, Man-Tak Shing. Includes bibliographical references (p. 83-84). Also available online.
Saks, Craig Sheldon. "Expanding software process improvement models beyond the software process itself." Master's thesis, University of Cape Town, 1999. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/16844.
Full textThe problems besetting software development and maintenance are well recorded and numerous strategies have been adopted over the years to overcome the so-called "software crisis". One increasingly popular strategy focuses on managing the processes by which software is built, maintained and managed. As such, many software organisations see software process improvement initiatives as an important strategy to help them improve their software development and maintenance performance. Two of the more popular software process improvement (SPI) models used by the software industry to help them in this endeavour are the Capability Maturity Model for Software (SW-CMM) from the Software Engineering Institute and the Software Process Improvement and Capability determination (SPICE) model from the International Standards Organisation. This research begins with the supposition that, although these SPI models have added significant value to many organisations, they have a potential shortcoming in that they tend to focus almost exclusively on the software process itself and seem to neglect other organisational aspects that could contribute to improved software development and maintenance performance. This research is concerned with exploring this potential shortcoming and identifying complementary improvement areas that the SW -CMM and SPICE models fail to address adequately. A theoretical framework for extending the SW-CMM and SPICE models is proposed. Thereafter complementary improvement areas are identified and integrated with the SW-CMM and SPICE models to develop an Extended SPI Model. This Extended SPI Model adopts a systemic view of software process and IS organisational improvement by addressing a wide range of complementary improvement considerations. A case study of an SPI project is described, with the specific objective of testing and refining the Extended SPI Model. The results seem to indicate that the framework and Extended SPI Model are largely valid, although a few changes were made in light of the findings of the case study. Finally, the implications of the research for both theory and practice are discussed.
Inada, Kenichiro. "Analysis of Japanese Software Business." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/59244.
Full textCataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 94-96).
Today, our society is surrounded by information system, computers, and software. It is no exaggeration to say that our daily life depends on software and its function. Accordingly, the business of software has made miraculous growth in the last two decades and is playing a significant role in various industries. In accordance with the growing business needs for effective software and information systems, various firms in various countries have entered the business of software seeking for prosperity. Some have succeeded, some have failed. What distinguishes these firms is its ability to manage and deliver quality products on demand, on time, at a low cost. To achieve such goal, software firms have thought out different methods and tools striving to establish its practice. Nevertheless, many software firms around the globe are struggling to satisfy its clients to achieve business success. With no exception, Japanese software firms are facing difficulties of managing software projects. While its ability to deliver high quality product is well acknowledged among software industry, its high cost structure and schedule delays are thought of as serious problems. Moreover, some of the transitions in the industry are forcing Japanese software firms to seek new opportunities. Therefore, it is important for Japanese software firms to establish more productive ways of developing software products and effective business strategies. Primal objective of this paper is to analyze the present conditions of Japanese software firms and to derive some recommendations which could enhance its current situation. It will also include the discussion of software development practices in US and India firms to better understand strength and weaknesses of Japanese firms and capture some important concepts which can be applied to improve current practice.
by Kenichiro Inada.
S.M.in System Design and Management
Scott, Randall C. "Reengineering real-time software systems." Thesis, Monterey, Calif. : Springfield, Va. : Naval Postgraduate School ; Available from National Technical Information Service, 1993. http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ADA273408.
Full textFrid, Jonas. "Security Critical Systems in Software." Thesis, Linköpings universitet, Informationskodning, 2010. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-61588.
Full textSectra Communications utvecklar idag kryptoprodukter med högt ställda krav på separation mellan krypterad och okrypterad data. Traditionellt har denna separation gjorts i hårdvara med fysiskt åtskilda komponenter, vilket lett till större produkter, högre energiförbrukning och högre tillverkningskostnader än motsvarande system för lägre säkerhetsnivåer. Ett alternativ till hårdvaruseparation har framkommit tack vare en ny typ av operativsystem baserat på ett koncept kallat "separationskärna", som erbjuder verifierbar separation mellan mjukvarukomponenter på en processor likvärdig med fysisk separation. Syftet med examensarbetet var att undersöka möjligheten att basera en produkt på ett sådant system samt vilka ytterligare möjligheter och problem med säkerhetsevaluering av produkten som uppstår. I examensarbetet utfördes en litteraturstudie av publikationer om separationskärnan ur ett historiskt och tekniskt perspektiv, samt den historiska utvecklingen inom säkerhetsevaluering av mjukvara och dess nuvarande status. Dessutom implementerades delar av ett mjukvarukrypto som en demonstrationsenhet baserad på Integrity från Green Hills Software, vilket är ett realtidsoperativsystem byggt kring en separationskärna. Arbetet visade att separationskärnan som koncept har nått en hög mognadsgrad och att det är rimligt att börja använda denna typ av operativsystem till produkter med mycket högt ställda säkerhetskrav inom en snar framtid. Det skulle förutom uppenbara vinster med minskad mängd hårdvara även ge större flexibilitet vid utvecklingen och möjlighet till exaktare uppdelning av funktioner. Samtidigt ställer det andra krav på utvecklarna och det behövs ytterligare utredning om vissa aspekter av hur evalueringsförfarandet påverkas, systemens feltolerans samt prestanda.
Schmidgall, Ralf. "Automotive embedded systems software reprogramming." Thesis, Brunel University, 2012. http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/7070.
Full textBooks on the topic "Software systems"
Germany) NATO Advanced Study Institute on Software Systems Safety (2013 Marktoberdorf. Software systems safety. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2014.
Find full textBiggerstaff, Ted J. Systems software tools. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall, 1986.
Find full textBiggerstaff, Ted J. Systems software tools. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice / Hall International, 1986.
Find full textChen, M. J., M. Buamud, and D. M. Grant. Generation Systems Software. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1191-1.
Full textDenzer, Ralf, Gerald Schimak, and David Russell, eds. Environmental Software Systems. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34951-0.
Full textZeng, Deze, Lin Gu, Shengli Pan, and Song Guo. Software Defined Systems. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32942-6.
Full textMason, J. C., and M. G. Cox, eds. Scientific Software Systems. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0841-3.
Full textDenzer, Ralf, David A. Swayne, Martin Purvis, and Gerald Schimak, eds. Environmental Software Systems. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35503-0.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Software systems"
Eisner, Howard. "Software." In Systems Architecting, 55–60. Boca Raton, FL : CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, 2019.: CRC Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9780429327810-10.
Full textJorgensen, Paul C., and Byron DeVries. "Testing Systems of Systems." In Software Testing, 373–90. 5th ed. Boca Raton: Auerbach Publications, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003168447-19.
Full textTaylor, G. "Software Systems." In Work Out Computer Studies for First Examinations, 168–89. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18143-8_9.
Full textTaylor, G. "Software Systems." In Work Out Computer Studies GCSE, 170–92. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-09458-5_9.
Full textMett, Percy. "Systems Software." In Introduction to Computing, 275–312. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08039-7_10.
Full textBurrell, Mark. "Systems Software." In Fundamentals of Computer Architecture, 231–45. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-11313-9_14.
Full textHartley, M. G., M. Healey, and P. G. Depledge. "Software Systems." In Mini and Microcomputer Systems, 203–41. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19315-8_8.
Full textAlber, Antone F. "Software." In Interactive Computer Systems, 201–23. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2888-3_8.
Full textEisner, Howard. "Software Engineering." In Systems Engineering: Building Successful Systems, 90–95. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-79336-3_23.
Full textMarwedel, Peter. "System Software." In Embedded Systems, 203–37. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60910-8_4.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Software systems"
Hen-Geul Yeh and Paul Ingerson. "Software-defined radio for OFDM transceivers." In 2010 4th Annual IEEE Systems Conference. IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/systems.2010.5482434.
Full textMenon, Catherine, and Tim Kelly. "Eliciting software safety requirements in complex systems." In 2010 4th Annual IEEE Systems Conference. IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/systems.2010.5482343.
Full textBoxer, Philip J. "Building organizational agility into large-scale software-reliant environments." In 2009 3rd Annual IEEE Systems Conference. IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/systems.2009.4815830.
Full textKumar, Ashok, Sujana Shruthi Mudhole, and Blake Lemoine. "A smart sensor-based software system for driver evaluation." In 2010 4th Annual IEEE Systems Conference. IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/systems.2010.5482437.
Full textFoustok, Mohamad. "Experiences in Large-Scale, Component Based, Model-Driven Software Development." In 2007 1st Annual IEEE Systems Conference. IEEE, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/systems.2007.374657.
Full textTurner, Richard, Arthur Pyster, and Michael Pennotti. "Developing and validating a framework for integrating systems and software engineering." In 2009 3rd Annual IEEE Systems Conference. IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/systems.2009.4815836.
Full textBoutayeb, M. "A decentralized software sensor based approach for large-scale dynamical systems." In 2010 4th Annual IEEE Systems Conference. IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/systems.2010.5482344.
Full textOberndorf, Patricia, and Carol A. Sledge. "Evolution of a software engineer in a SoS system engineering world." In 2010 4th Annual IEEE Systems Conference. IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/systems.2010.5482478.
Full textvan de Laar, Piërre, Sjir van Loo, Gerrit Muller, Teade Punter, David Watts, Pierre America, and Joland Rutgers. "The Darwin Project: Evolvability of Software-Intensive Systems." In Third International IEEE Workshop on Software Evolvability 2007. IEEE, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/software-evolvability.2007.14.
Full textCroll, Paul R. "System and software assurance — rationalizing governance, engineering practice, and engineering economics." In 2010 4th Annual IEEE Systems Conference. IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/systems.2010.5482470.
Full textReports on the topic "Software systems"
Robey, Robert W. Software Build and Delivery Systems. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), July 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1261804.
Full textOlson, Thomas J., Frank Z. Brill, Glenn S. Wasson, Jennifer A. Wong, and Ari S. Rapkin. Software for Advanced Vision Systems. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, April 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada293507.
Full textOlson, T. J. Software for Advanced Vision Systems. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, July 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada306666.
Full textRosenthal, Lynne S. Integrated software for microcomputer systems. Gaithersburg, MD: National Bureau of Standards, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/nbs.sp.500-135.
Full textChandrasekaran, B., and Bruce Weide. Functional Representation of Software Systems and Component-Based Software Technology. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, February 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada341742.
Full textLeibee, A. Nuclear Software Systems Division (NSSD) software testing and validation guidelines. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), July 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/6676291.
Full textHoting, S. K., and R. J. Costello. Computer Systems Division Software System Metrics Approach, Revision 1. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, September 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada328410.
Full textVo, C. V. Computer systems and software description for gas characterization system. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), April 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/16922.
Full textMoore, Tamra K. Information Systems Criteria for Applying Software Reengineering: Guidelines for Identifying Information Systems for Software Reengineering. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, May 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada274699.
Full textTurner, C. R., Alfonso Fuggetta, and Alexander L. Wolf. Toward Feature Engineering of Software Systems. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, February 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada445868.
Full text