Academic literature on the topic 'Software quality evaluation'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Software quality evaluation.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Software quality evaluation"
Vaníček, J. "Software quality requirements." Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika) 52, No. 4 (February 17, 2012): 177–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/5014-agricecon.
Full textVaníček, J. "Software and data quality." Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika) 52, No. 3 (February 17, 2012): 138–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/5007-agricecon.
Full textThompson, William E. "Software Quality Assurance and Evaluation." Journal of Quality Technology 23, no. 3 (July 1991): 264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1991.11979334.
Full textAjith Jubilson, E., and Ravi Sankar Sangam. "Software Metrics for Computing Quality of Software Agents." Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience 17, no. 5 (May 1, 2020): 2035–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1166/jctn.2020.8845.
Full textLAN, Yu-Qing, Tong ZHAO, Jing GAO, Hui JIE, and Mao-Zhong JIN. "Quality Evaluation of Foundational Software Platform." Journal of Software 20, no. 3 (March 9, 2010): 567–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1001.2009.03443.
Full textMcDaniel, James G. "Improving system quality through software evaluation." Computers in Biology and Medicine 32, no. 3 (May 2002): 127–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0010-4825(02)00010-0.
Full textBowen, John B. "Comments on software quality evaluation guidebook." ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 11, no. 1 (January 1986): 19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/382300.382305.
Full textKumar, Pradeep, Raghav Yadav, and Dileram Bansal. "Usability and Evaluation of Software Quality using Software Metrics." International Journal of Computer Applications 71, no. 3 (June 26, 2013): 9–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.5120/12336-8606.
Full textVILLALBA, M. TERESA, LUIS FERNÁNDEZ-SANZ, JUAN J. CUADRADO-GALLEGO, and JOSE J. MARTÍNEZ. "SOFTWARE QUALITY EVALUATION FOR SECURITY COTS PRODUCTS." International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering 20, no. 01 (February 2010): 27–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0218194010004633.
Full textLiu, Xiao Ying, and Jian Zhang. "Software Quality Evaluation for Vehicle Based on Set Pair Theory." Applied Mechanics and Materials 738-739 (March 2015): 1332–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.738-739.1332.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Software quality evaluation"
Jah, Muzamil. "Software metrics : usability and evaluation of software quality." Thesis, University West, Department of Economics and IT, 2008. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hv:diva-548.
Full textIt is difficult to understand, let alone improve, the quality of software without the knowledge of its software development process and software products. There must be some measurement process to predict the software development, and to evaluate the software products. This thesis provides a brief view on Software Quality, Software Metrics, and Software Metrics methods that will predict and measure the specified quality factors of software. It further discusses about the Quality as given by the standards such as ISO, principal elements required for the Software Quality and Software Metrics as the measurement technique to predict the Software Quality. This thesis was performed by evaluating a source code developed in Java, using Software Metrics, such as Size Metrics, Complexity Metrics, and Defect Metrics. Results show that, the quality of software can be analyzed, studied and improved by the usage of software metrics.
Barney, Sebastian. "Software Quality Alignment : Evaluation and Understanding." Doctoral thesis, Karlskrona : Blekinge Institute of Technology, 2011. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:bth-00492.
Full textALVARO, Alexandre. "A software component quality framework." Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 2009. https://repositorio.ufpe.br/handle/123456789/1372.
Full textCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Um grande desafio da Engenharia de Software Baseada em Componentes (ESBC) é a qualidade dos componentes utilizados em um sistema. A confiabilidade de um sistema baseado em componentes depende da confiabilidade dos componentes dos quais ele é composto. Na ESBC, a busca, seleção e avaliação de componentes de software é considerado um ponto chave para o efetivo desenvolvimento de sistemas baseado em componentes. Até agora a indústria de software tem se concentrado nos aspectos funcionais dos componentes de software, deixando de lado uma das tarefas mais árduas, que é a avaliação de sua qualidade. Se a garantia de qualidade de componentes desenvolvidos in-house é uma tarefa custosa, a garantia da qualidade utilizando componentes desenvolvidos externamente os quais frequentemente não se tem acesso ao código fonte e documentação detalhada se torna um desafio ainda maior. Assim, esta Tese introduz um Framework de Qualidade de Componentes de Software, baseado em módulos bem definidos que se complementam a fim de garantir a qualidade dos componentes de software. Por fim, um estudo experimental foi desenvolvido e executado de modo que se possa analisar a viabilidade do framework proposto
CARVALHO, Fernando Ferreira de. "An embedded software component quality evaluation methodology." Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 2010. https://repositorio.ufpe.br/handle/123456789/2412.
Full textUniversidade de Pernambuco
Um dos maiores desafios para a indústria de embarcados é fornecer produtos com alto nível de qualidade e funcionalidade, a um baixo custo e curto tempo de desenvolvimento, disponibilizando-o rapidamente ao mercado, aumentando assim, o retorno dos investimentos. Os requisitos de custo e tempo de desenvolvimento têm sido abordados com bastante êxito pela engenharia de software baseada em componentes (CBSE) aliada à técnica de reuso de componentes. No entanto, a utilização da abordagem CBSE sem as devidas verificações da qualidade dos componentes utilizados, pode trazer conseqüências catastróficas (Jezequel et al., 1997). A utilização de mecanismos apropriados de pesquisa, seleção e avaliação da qualidade de componentes são considerados pontos chave na adoção da abordagem CBSE. Diante do exposto, esta tese propõe uma Metodologia para Avaliação da Qualidade de Componentes de Software Embarcados sob diferentes aspectos. A idéia é solucionar a falta de consistência entre as normas ISO/IEC 9126, 14598 e 2500, incluindo o contexto de componente de software e estendendo-o ao domínio de sistemas embarcados. Estas normas provêem definições de alto nível para características e métricas para produtos de software, mas não provêem formas de usá-las efetivamente, tornando muito difícil aplicá-las sem adquirir mais informações de outras fontes. A Metodologia é composta de quatro módulos que se complementam em busca da qualidade, através de um processo de avaliação, um modelo de qualidade, técnicas de avaliação agrupadas por níveis de qualidade e uma abordagem de métricas. Desta forma, ela auxilia o desenvolvedor de sistemas embarcado no processo de seleção de componentes, avaliando qual componente melhor se enquadra nos requisitos do sistema. É utilizada por avaliadores terceirizados quando contratados por fornecedores a fim de obter credibilidade em seus componentes. A metodologia possibilita avaliar a qualidade do componente embarcado antes do mesmo ser armazenado em um sistema de repositório, especialmente no contexto do framework robusto para reuso de software, proposto por Almeida (Almeida, 2004)
Kristensson, David. "Quality assurance in software development & evaluation of existing quality systems." Thesis, University West, Department of Economics and Informatics, 2004. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hv:diva-522.
Full textOwrak, Ali. "A quality evaluation model for service-oriented software." Thesis, University of Manchester, 2008. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.499901.
Full textBERTRAN, ISELA MACIA. "EVALUATION OF SOFTWARE QUALITY BASED ON UML MODELS." PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO DE JANEIRO, 2009. http://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/Busca_etds.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=13748@1.
Full textUm dos objetivos da engenharia de software é a construção de software com um nível de qualidade elevado com o menor custo e no menor tempo possível. Nesse contexto, muitas técnicas para o controle da qualidade de design de software têm sido definidas. Além disso, mecanismos baseados em métricas para a detecção de problemas também têm sido definidos. A maioria dessas técnicas e mecanismos foca a análise do código fonte. Porém, para reduzir retrabalho inútil, é importante utilizar técnicas de análise da qualidade capazes de detectar problemas de design já desde os modelos dos sistemas. Esta dissertação propõe: (i) um conjunto de estratégias de detecção para identificar, em modelos UML, problemas de design específicos e recorrentes na literatura: Long Parameter List, God Class, Data Class, Shotgun Surgery, Misplaced Class e God Package, e (ii) a utilização do modelo da qualidade QMOOD para avaliar design de software a partir de seus diagramas de classes. Para automatizar a aplicação destes mecanismos foi implementada uma ferramenta: a QCDTool. Os mecanismos desenvolvidos foram avaliados no contexto de dois estudos experimentais. O primeiro estudo avaliou a acurácia, precisão e recall das estratégias de detecção propostas. Esse estudo mostrou os benefícios e desvantagens da aplicação, em modelos, das estratégias de detecção propostas. O segundo estudo avaliou a utilidade da aplicação do modelo da qualidade QMOOD em diagramas UML. Esse estudo mostrou que foi possível identificar, em diagramas de classes, variações das propriedades de design, e, conseqüentemente, dos atributos da qualidade nos sistemas analisados.
One of the goals of software engineering is the development of high quality software at a small cost an in a short period of time. In this context, several techniques have been defined for controlling the quality of software designs. Furthermore, many metrics-based mechanisms have been defined for detecting software design flaws. Most of these mechanisms and techniques focus on analyzing the source code. However, in order to reduce unnecessary rework it is important to use quality analysis techniques that allow the detection of design flaws earlier in the development cycle. We believe that these techniques should analyze design flaws starting from software models. This dissertation proposes: (i) a set of strategies to detect, in UML models, specific and recurrent design problems: Long Parameter List, God Class, Data Class, Shotgun Surgery, Misplaced Class and God Package; (ii) and the use of QMOOD quality model to analyze class diagrams. To automate the application of these mechanisms we implemented a tool: the QCDTool. The detection strategies and QMOOD model were evaluated in the context of two experimental studies. The first study analyzed the accuracy, precision and recall of the proposed detection strategies. The second study analyzed the utility of use QMOOD quality model in the class diagrams. The results of the first study have shown the benefits and drawbacks of the application in class diagrams of some of the proposed detection strategies. The second study shows that it was possible to identify, based on class diagrams, variations of the design properties and consequently, of the quality attributes in the analyzed systems.
Jabangwe, Ronald. "Software Quality Evaluation for Evolving Systems in Distributed Development Environments." Doctoral thesis, Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, Institutionen för programvaruteknik, 2015. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:bth-00613.
Full textPowale, Kalkin. "Automotive Powertrain Software Evaluation Tool." Master's thesis, Universitätsbibliothek Chemnitz, 2018. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:ch1-qucosa-233186.
Full textMårtensson, Frans. "Software Architecture Quality Evaluation : Approaches in an Industrial Context." Licentiate thesis, Karlskrona : Blekinge Institute of Technology, 2006. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:bth-00313.
Full textBooks on the topic "Software quality evaluation"
Dobbins, James H. Software quality assurance and evaluation. Milwaukee, Wis: ASQC Quality Press, 1990.
Find full textJones, Capers. Applied software measurement: Assuring productivity and quality. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991.
Find full textJones, Capers. Applied software measurement: Assuring productivity and quality. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1997.
Find full textApplied software measurement: Global analysis of productivity and quality. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2008.
Find full textJones, Capers. Applied software measurement: Global analysis of productivity and quality. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2008.
Find full textJones, Capers. Applied software measurement: Global analysis of productivity and quality. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2008.
Find full textD, Ince, ed. Derivation and validation of software metrics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.
Find full textR, Willis Ronald, ed. Software quality engineering: A total technical and management approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1988.
Find full textSoftware assessments, benchmarks, and best practices / Capers Jones. Boston, Mass: Addison Wesley, 2000.
Find full textInternational Organization for Standardization. Joint Technical Committee ISO/IEC JTC 1, Information Technology. Information technology - software product evaluation - quality characteristics and guidelines for their use. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 1991.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Software quality evaluation"
Beus-Dukic, Ljerka, and Jørgen Bøegh. "COTS Software Quality Evaluation." In COTS-Based Software Systems, 72–80. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36465-x_7.
Full textCogan, Boris I., and Tamara O. Matveeva. "Automatic Software Evaluation Based on Domain Knowledge and Formal Evaluation Specification." In Software Quality Management VI, 173–84. London: Springer London, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1303-4_15.
Full textZüllighoven, Heinz, Carola Lilienthal, and Marcel Bennicke. "Software Architecture Analysis and Evaluation." In Quality of Software Architectures, 7–8. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11921998_5.
Full textNoemmer, Raphael, and Roman Haas. "An Evaluation of Test Suite Minimization Techniques." In Software Quality: Quality Intelligence in Software and Systems Engineering, 51–66. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35510-4_4.
Full textTenhunen, Vesa, and Jorma Sajaniemi. "An Evaluation of Inspection Automation Tools." In Software Quality — ECSQ 2002, 351–61. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47984-8_38.
Full textFlorentz, Bastian, and Michaela Huhn. "Embedded Systems Architecture: Evaluation and Analysis." In Quality of Software Architectures, 145–62. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11921998_14.
Full textCellino, D. "Software applications complexity evaluation in a bank environment." In Achieving Quality in Software, 400–411. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34869-8_32.
Full textKunda, Douglas. "STACE: Social Technical Approach to COTS Software Evaluation." In Component-Based Software Quality, 64–84. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45064-1_4.
Full textLyness, J. N. "Evaluation of minimization software based on performance profile techniques." In Quality of Numerical Software, 152–54. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-5041-2940-4_11.
Full textEnright, W. H., and H. Hayashi. "The evaluation of numerical software for delay differential equations." In Quality of Numerical Software, 179–93. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-5041-2940-4_14.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Software quality evaluation"
CLOUGH, A. "Software component quality evaluation." In 8th Computing in Aerospace Conference. Reston, Virigina: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.1991-3760.
Full text"SOFTWARE QUALITY MANAGEMENT FLOSS TOOLS EVALUATION." In 12th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems. SciTePress - Science and and Technology Publications, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0002905303870390.
Full textRoehrig, Hans, William J. Dallas, Hartwig R. Blume, and Mahesh Sivarudrappa. "Software for CRT image quality evaluation." In Medical Imaging 2000, edited by Seong K. Mun. SPIE, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.383068.
Full textWen-Hong, Liu, and Wu Xin. "The Software Quality Evaluation Method Based on Software Testing." In 2012 International Conference on Computer Science and Service System (CSSS). IEEE, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/csss.2012.369.
Full textLee, Joon-Sang, Oksoon Jeon, and Jewhi Ryu. "Performance Evaluation Framework for Software Quality Engineering." In 2009 9th International Conference on Quality Software (QSIC). IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/qsic.2009.65.
Full textFontana, Francesca Arcelli, and Stefano Maggioni. "Metrics and Antipatterns for Software Quality Evaluation." In 2011 34th Annual IEEE Software Engineering Workshop (SEW). IEEE, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/sew.2011.13.
Full textLi Xiaoli, Liu Chao, Ding Wenrui, and Wang Lei. "Software dependability evaluation based on quality characteristics." In 2nd International Conference on Computer and Automation Engineering (ICCAE 2010). IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iccae.2010.5452054.
Full textBanerjee, Prasenjit, and Anirban Sarkar. "Quality Evaluation Framework for Component Based Software." In the Second International Conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2905055.2905223.
Full textAhmad, Jamshed, and Abdul Wahid Khan. "Software Outsourcing Quality Evaluation Management Model (SOQEMM)." In 2020 3rd International Conference on Computing, Mathematics and Engineering Technologies (iCoMET). IEEE, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icomet48670.2020.9073839.
Full textBehutiye, Woubshet, Pertti Seppänen, Pilar Rodríguez, and Markku Oivo. "Documentation of Quality Requirements in Agile Software Development." In EASE '20: Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3383219.3383245.
Full textReports on the topic "Software quality evaluation"
Dyson, Karen A. Quality Evaluation System (QUES) Software Quality Framework as Implemented in QUES. Volume 2. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, December 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada252976.
Full textDempsey, Terri L. Handling the Qualitative Side of Mixed Methods Research: A Multisite, Team-Based High School Education Evaluation Study. RTI Press, September 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.3768/rtipress.2018.mr.0039.1809.
Full textBarbacci, Mario R., Mark H. Klein, and Charles B. Weinstock. Principles for Evaluating the Quality Attributes of a Software Architecture. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, March 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada324233.
Full textXing, Lei, Hongmin Guo, and Zhiqian Wang. Efficacy and safety of Suzi Jiangqi Decoction in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis. INPLASY - International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, August 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2021.8.0035.
Full text