Academic literature on the topic 'Software Metric'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Software Metric.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Software Metric"
Kaur, Sandeep. "Software Metrics and Metric Tools A Review." International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication 3, no. 4 (2015): 2076–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.17762/ijritcc2321-8169.150468.
Full textXiang, Yiming, Weifeng Pan, Haibo Jiang, Yunfang Zhu, and Hao Li. "Measuring Software Modularity Based on Software Networks." Entropy 21, no. 4 (March 28, 2019): 344. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e21040344.
Full textMasárová, Renáta. "Fréchet Metric for Space of Binary Coded Software." Research Papers Faculty of Materials Science and Technology Slovak University of Technology 22, no. 35 (December 1, 2014): 17–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/rput-2014-0030.
Full textKim, Jungho, Sungwon Kang, Jongsun Ahn, and Seonah Lee. "EMSA: Extensibility Metric for Software Architecture." International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering 28, no. 03 (March 2018): 371–405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0218194018500134.
Full textSHARMA, ARUN, RAJESH KUMAR, and P. S. GROVER. "EMPIRICAL EVALUATION AND VALIDATION OF INTERFACE COMPLEXITY METRICS FOR SOFTWARE COMPONENTS." International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering 18, no. 07 (November 2008): 919–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0218194008003957.
Full textSabbani, Sarachyuth, Kiran Kumar Reddi, and S. V. Achuta Rao. "Software Quality: Issues, Concerns and New Directions." INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS & TECHNOLOGY 11, no. 8 (November 27, 2013): 2887–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.24297/ijct.v11i8.3007.
Full textPhani Sheetal, A., and K. Ravindranath. "Software metric evaluation on cloud based applications." International Journal of Engineering & Technology 7, no. 1.5 (December 31, 2017): 13. http://dx.doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i1.5.9071.
Full textSrivastava, Varun Kar Lal, and Dr Amit Asthana. "An Efficient Universal Software Metric Tool for C#." Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems 11, no. 10 (October 31, 2019): 75–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.5373/jardcs/v11i10/20193008.
Full textCHAN, VICTOR K. Y., W. ERIC WONG, and T. F. XIE. "A STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY TO SIMPLIFY SOFTWARE METRIC MODELS CONSTRUCTED USING INCOMPLETE DATA SAMPLES." International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering 17, no. 06 (December 2007): 689–707. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0218194007003495.
Full textShao, Yanli, Jingru Zhao, Xingqi Wang, Weiwei Wu, and Jinglong Fang. "Research on Cross-Company Defect Prediction Method to Improve Software Security." Security and Communication Networks 2021 (August 24, 2021): 1–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5558561.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Software Metric"
Rodríguez, Martínez Cecilia. "Software quality studies using analytical metric analysis." Thesis, KTH, Kommunikationssystem, CoS, 2013. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-120325.
Full textIdag spenderar ingenjörsföretag en stor mängd resurser på att upptäcka och korrigera buggar (fel) i sin mjukvara. Det är oftast programmerare som inför dessa buggar på grund av fel och misstag som uppkommer när de skriver koden eller specifikationerna. Inget verktyg kan detektera alla dessa buggar. Några av buggarna förblir oupptäckta trots testning av koden. Av dessa skäl har många forskare försökt hitta indikatorer i programvarans källkod som kan användas för att förutsäga förekomsten av buggar. Varje fel i källkoden är ett potentiellt misslyckande som gör att applikationen inte fungerar som förväntat. För att hitta buggarna testas koden med många olika testfall för att försöka täcka alla möjliga kombinationer och fall. Förutsägelse av buggar informerar programmerarna om var i koden buggarna finns. Således kan programmerarna mer noggrant testa felbenägna filer och därmed spara mycket tid genom att inte behöva testa felfria filer. Detta examensarbete har skapat ett verktyg som kan förutsäga felbenägen källkod skriven i C ++. För att uppnå detta har vi utnyttjat en välkänd metod som heter Software Metrics. Många studier har visat att det finns ett samband mellan Software Metrics och förekomsten av buggar. I detta projekt har en Neuro-Fuzzy hybridmodell baserad på Fuzzy c-means och Radial Basis Neural Network använts. Effektiviteten av modellen har testats i ett mjukvaruprojekt på Ericsson. Testning av denna modell visade att programmet inte Uppnå hög noggrannhet på grund av bristen av oberoende urval i datauppsättningen. Men gjordt experiment visade att klassificering modeller ger bättre förutsägelser än regressionsmodeller. Exjobbet avslutade genom att föreslå framtida arbetet som skulle kunna förbättra detta program.
Actualmente las empresas de ingeniería derivan una gran cantidad de recursos a la detección y corrección de errores en sus códigos software. Estos errores se deben generalmente a los errores cometidos por los desarrolladores cuando escriben el código o sus especificaciones. No hay ninguna herramienta capaz de detectar todos estos errores y algunos de ellos pasan desapercibidos tras el proceso de pruebas. Por esta razón, numerosas investigaciones han intentado encontrar indicadores en los códigos fuente del software que puedan ser utilizados para detectar la presencia de errores. Cada error en un código fuente es un error potencial en el funcionamiento del programa, por ello los programas son sometidos a exhaustivas pruebas que cubren (o intentan cubrir) todos los posibles caminos del programa para detectar todos sus errores. La temprana localización de errores informa a los programadores dedicados a la realización de estas pruebas sobre la ubicación de estos errores en el código. Así, los programadores pueden probar con más cuidado los archivos más propensos a tener errores dejando a un lado los archivos libres de error. En este proyecto se ha creado una herramienta capaz de predecir código software propenso a errores escrito en C++. Para ello, en este proyecto se ha utilizado un indicador que ha sido cuidadosamente estudiado y ha demostrado su relación con la presencia de errores: las métricas del software. En este proyecto un modelo híbrido neuro-disfuso basado en Fuzzy c-means y en redes neuronales de función de base radial ha sido utilizado. La eficacia de este modelo ha sido probada en un proyecto software de Ericsson. Como resultado se ha comprobado que el modelo no alcanza una alta precisión debido a la falta de muestras independientes en el conjunto de datos y los experimentos han mostrado que los modelos de clasificación proporcionan mejores predicciones que los modelos de regresión. El proyecto concluye sugiriendo trabajo que mejoraría el funcionamiento del programa en el futuro.
Sigfusson, Johann Tor. "Software metric extension of the Enterprisemodelling technique." Thesis, University of Skövde, Department of Computer Science, 1997. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:his:diva-243.
Full textAbstract The objective of this project is to make it possible to evaluate real-time operating systems. A requirement specification for real-time operating system is represented with the help of the Enterprise Modelling technique. What is needed is to measure if the requirements, defined in the requirement specification, can be fulfilled by existing real-time operating system.
This dissertation is concerned with if it is possible to extend the Enterprise Modelling (EM) technique with software metrics. An emphasis is put on integrating an existing metrics paradigm with the EM technique.
The study shows that a paradigm, called Goal Question Metrics (GQM) can be used to extending the EM technique with software metrics.
Other results are that the extended EM model is good to identify metrics, because of its goal-oriented technique, with strong coupling to the enterprise, and actors and activities related to the product. This can be used to validate that relevant metrics are chosen, based on the need of components related to the enterprise.
Matthews, S. G. "Metric domains for completeness." Thesis, University of Warwick, 1985. http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/60775/.
Full textGonzalez, Marco A. "A new change propagation metric to assess software evolvability." Thesis, University of British Columbia, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/2429/44607.
Full textGray, Christopher L. "A Coupling-Complexity Metric Suite for Predicting Software Quality." DigitalCommons@CalPoly, 2008. https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/theses/14.
Full textLincke, Rüdiger. "Validation of a standard- and metric-based software quality model /." Växjö : Växjö University Press, 2009. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:vxu:diva-5846.
Full textKonuralp, Zeynep. "Software Process Improvement In A Software Development Environment." Master's thesis, METU, 2007. http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12609059/index.pdf.
Full textrkiye (XCOM) is studied and the static software development metrics based on a recent proposal have been evaluated. The static software metrics based improvement suggestions and the author&rsquo
s improvement suggestions discussed with the senior staff are compared. An improved peer review process is proposed. The static software development metrics have been evaluated on the improved process to see the impacts of the improvements. The improved process has been already implemented at XCOM and preliminary results have been obtained.
Dahmann, Franz-Dietmar. "Correlation between quality management metric and people capability maturity model." Thesis, Monterey, Calif. : Springfield, Va. : Naval Postgraduate School ; Available from National Technical Information Service, 2003. http://library.nps.navy.mil/uhtbin/hyperion-image/03sep%5FDahmann.pdf.
Full textThesis advisor(s): John Osmundson, J. Bret Michael. Includes bibliographical references (p. 83-84). Also available online.
Gray, Christopher L. Janzen David. "A coupling-complexity metric suite for predicting software quality : a thesis /." [San Luis Obispo, Calif. : California Polytechnic State University], 2008. http://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/theses/14/.
Full textMajor professor: David Janzen, Ph.D. "Presented to the faculty of California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo." "In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree [of] Master of Science in Computer Science." "June 2008." Includes bibliographical references (leaves 57-62). Also available online. Also available on microfiche (1 sheet).
Long, Cary D. "A proposed software maintenance metric for the object oriented programming paradigm." Master's thesis, This resource online, 1995. http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-02022010-020231/.
Full textBooks on the topic "Software Metric"
Breugel, Franck. Comparative Metric Semantics of Programming Languages: Nondeterminism and Recursion. Boston, MA: Birkhäuser Boston, 1996.
Find full textWatson, Arthur Henry. Structured testing: A testing methology using the cyclomatic complexity metric. Edited by Wallace Dolores R and McCabe Thomas J. 1941-. Gaithersburg, MD: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1996.
Find full textLehner, Franz, Reiner Dumke, and Alain Abran, eds. Software Metrics. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-99929-0.
Full textSoftware Metrics. London: Taylor & Francis Inc, 2003.
Find full textlibrary, Wiley online, ed. Software metrics and software metrology. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley, 2010.
Find full textAbran, Alain. Software Metrics and Software Metrology. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470606834.
Full textSchneidewind, Norman F. Validating software metrics. Monterey, Calif: Naval Postgraduate School, 1990.
Find full text1956-, Fenton Norman E., and Littlewood B, eds. Software reliability and metrics. London: Elsevier Applied Science, 1991.
Find full textSoftware metrics: Measurement for software process improvement. Oxford, UK: NCC Blackwell, 1996.
Find full textFranklin, Daniel J. Software metrics using experimental design. Boston, MA: Boston University, School of Management, 1992.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Software Metric"
Shin, Won, Tae-Wan Kim, Doo-Hyun Kim, and Chun-Hyon Chang. "Parametric Software Metric." In Software Engineering and Computer Systems, 266–73. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22203-0_23.
Full textKichenamourty, Vedha. "Metric for Effective Test Coverage." In Software Measurement, 127–40. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-08949-0_8.
Full textJaspan, Ciera, and Caitlin Sadowski. "No Single Metric Captures Productivity." In Rethinking Productivity in Software Engineering, 13–20. Berkeley, CA: Apress, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-4221-6_2.
Full textMisra, Sanjay, and Ferid Cafer. "A Software Metric for Python Language." In Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2010, 301–13. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12165-4_24.
Full textPodgorelec, Vili, Peter Kokol, and Milan Zorman. "A Fractal Software Complexity Metric Analyser." In Computer Aided Systems Theory - EUROCAST’99, 486–93. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/10720123_42.
Full textChen, Yih Farn, Balachander Krishnamurthy, and Kiem Phong Vo. "An objective reuse metric: Model and methodology." In Software Engineering — ESEC '95, 109–23. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60406-5_10.
Full textPola, Giordano, Elena De Santis, and Maria Domenica Di Benedetto. "On Approximate Diagnosability of Metric Systems." In Software Engineering and Formal Methods, 269–83. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66197-1_17.
Full textJones, Capers. "Function Points as a Universal Metric." In Software Development Patterns and Antipatterns, 369–466. Boca Raton: Auerbach Publications, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003193128-16.
Full textMizuno, Osamu, and Hideaki Hata. "Yet Another Metric for Predicting Fault-Prone Modules." In Advances in Software Engineering, 296–304. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10619-4_36.
Full textAmbriola, V., R. Meglio, V. Gervasi, and B. Mercurio. "Applying a metric framework to the software process: an experiment." In Software Process Technology, 207–26. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57739-4_27.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Software Metric"
Berardi, Rita Cristina Galarraga, and Duncan Dubugras Alcoba Ruiz. "Fuzzy-Provenance Architecture for Effort Metric Data Quality Assessment." In Simpósio Brasileiro de Qualidade de Software. Sociedade Brasileira de Computação - SBC, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.5753/sbqs.2009.15500.
Full textByelas, Heorhiy, and Alexandru Telea. "The Metric Lens: Visualizing Metrics and Structure on Software Diagrams." In 2008 15th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering (WCRE). IEEE, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/wcre.2008.26.
Full textNeedham, D., and S. Jones. "A Software Fault Tree Metric." In 22nd IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance. IEEE, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icsm.2006.8.
Full textBuse, Raymond P. L., and Westley R. Weimer. "A metric for software readability." In the 2008 international symposium. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1390630.1390647.
Full textPandey, Amit. "Stall estimation metric: An architectural metric for estimating software complexity." In 2016 5th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO). IEEE, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icrito.2016.7784987.
Full text"Proceedings Seventh International Software Metrics Symposium." In Proceedings Seventh International Software Metrics Symposium. METRICS 2001. IEEE, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/metric.2001.915509.
Full textRisi, M., G. Scanniello, and G. Tortora. "Metric Attitude." In 2013 17th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR 2013). IEEE, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/csmr.2013.59.
Full textBukhari, Zubaidah, Jamaiah Yahaya, and Aziz Deraman. "Software metric selection methods: A review." In 2015 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICEEI). IEEE, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iceei.2015.7352540.
Full textWang, Xiaowei. "The Metric System about Software Maintenance." In 2011 International Conference on Information Technology, Computer Engineering and Management Sciences (ICM). IEEE, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icm.2011.382.
Full textChandra, S., and R. A. Khan. "Software security metric identification framework (SSM)." In the International Conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1523103.1523250.
Full textReports on the topic "Software Metric"
Needham, D. M., and S. A. Jones. Software Fault Tree Key Node Metric Test Cases. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, April 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada460760.
Full textKothe, Douglas B., Kenneth J. Roche, and Ricky A. Kendall. FY 2009 Annual Report of Joule Software Metric SC GG 3.1/2.5.2, Improve Computational Science Capabilities. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), January 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/977116.
Full textMills, Everald E. Software Metrics. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, December 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada236140.
Full textSchultz, Herman P. Software Management Metrics. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, May 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada196916.
Full textBudlong, Faye, and Judi Peterson. Software Metrics Capability Evaluation Guide,. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, October 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada325385.
Full textColes, R. J., J. A. Kasputys, K. L. Lasko, T. F. Saunders, and H. P. Schultz. Software Reporting Metrics. Revision 2. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, November 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada163756.
Full textYule, H. P., and C. A. Riemer. Program for implementing software quality metrics. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), April 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/10166209.
Full textYule, H. P., and C. A. Riemer. Program for implementing software quality metrics. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), April 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/7233625.
Full textGrable, Ross. Software Metrics for Total Development Cycle Evaluation. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, November 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada246477.
Full textKurt G. Vedros. SAPHIRE 8 Quality Assurance Software Metrics Report. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), August 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1031699.
Full text