Journal articles: 'Socket preservation'

1

Fee, L. "Socket preservation." British Dental Journal 222, no. 8 (April 21, 2017): 579–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.355.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Kim, Young-Kyun, and Jeong-Kui Ku. "Extraction socket preservation." Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 46, no. 6 (December 31, 2020): 435–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2020.46.6.435.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Rhemrev, Guido. "Socket preservation technique." Tandartspraktijk 31, no. 5 (May 2010): 7–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12496-010-0107-2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Fischer, K., Y. Jockel-Schneider, M. Bechtold, S. Fickl, and U. Schlagenhauf. "„Socket preservation“ nach Zahnextraktion." Der Freie Zahnarzt 55, no. 4 (April 2011): 62–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12614-010-0834-7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Götz, W., and S. Schnutenhaus. "„Socket Healing“ und „Socket Preservation“: Eine kurze Übersicht." ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 125, no. 11 (November 28, 2016): 524–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-117764.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Byrne, Gerard. "Socket preservation of implant sites." Journal of the American Dental Association 143, no. 10 (October 2012): 1139–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0045.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Fee, L. "Correction: Retraction Note: Socket preservation." British Dental Journal 223, no. 9 (November 2017): 741. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.981.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Dimova, Cena. "Socket Preservation Procedure after Tooth Extraction." Key Engineering Materials 587 (November 2013): 325–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.587.325.

Full text

Abstract:

Jaw deformities from tooth removal can be prevented and repaired by a procedure called socket preservation. Socket preservation can greatly improve the smile’s appearance and increase the chances for successful dental implants for years to come. The procedure begins with atraumatic tooth extraction. Every attempt is made to preserve the surrounding bone and soft tissue, with an emphasis on being careful not to fracture the delicate buccal plate. There are a number of techniques and instruments that aid in this process. In general, one never wants to elevate so that force is directed toward the buccal plate. Once the tooth is extracted, all the granulation tissue is removed from the socket. It is important that good bleeding is established in the socket. Next, a bone graft material is placed into the socket.Various materials are used in modern dental and maxillofacial surgery for bone tissue substitution and reconstruction. All osteoplastic materials can be divided into four groups by origin: autogenic, allogenic, xenogenic and synthetic. The development of new medical technologies enables use of achievements in material science, biochemistry, molecular biology and genetic engineering while creating new combined synthetic materials for bone grafting. Mineralized cancellous bone is appropriate for most socket preservation cases.Synthetic resorbable materials were intended as an inexpensive substitute for natural hydroxyapatite. Synthetic graft materials include various types of calcium phosphate ceramics: tribasic calcium phosphate; bioglass; hydroxyapatite and its compositions with collagen, sulphated glycosaminoglycans such as keratan and chrondroitin sulphate as well as with sulphate and calcium phosphate.After the graft material is placed in the socket, it is then covered with a resorbable or non-resorbable membrane and sutured. Primary flap closure is not ideal. Most importantly, socket preservation helps to maintain the alveolar architecture. Socket preservation significantly reduces the loss of ridge width and height following tooth removal.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Chang, Li-Ching, and Yu-Min Cheng. "The Effect of Different Socket Types on Implant Therapy While Using Flapless Ridge Preservation." Applied Sciences 11, no. 3 (January 21, 2021): 970. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/app11030970.

Full text

Abstract:

This retrospective study compared the effects of different extraction sockets when using flapless ridge preservation during dental implant therapy. The extraction sockets were divided into four groups: Class I, intact soft tissue wall and bone walls; Class II, intact soft tissue wall with the destruction of at least one bone wall; Class III, the recession of all soft tissue walls by ≤5 mm; and Class IV, the recession of at least one soft tissue wall by >5 mm. We compared clinical parameters of dental implant therapy using flapless ridge preservation among these groups. Seventy patients with 92 dental implants, including 53 maxillary and 39 mandibular implants, involving flapless ridge preservation were enrolled. The implant survival rate was not affected by socket morphology. Total treatment time from extraction to final prosthesis placement was significantly longer in Class II and III than in Class I, among the maxillary sockets. However, there was no significant difference in the total treatment time among the different groups in the mandible. Therefore, implant survival rates did not differ according to socket morphology; however, total treatment time was significantly affected by socket morphology in the maxilla and was longer in socket classes associated with periodontitis.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Alenazi, Adel, Abdulrahman Abdullah Alotaibi, Yazaid Aljaeidi, and Nasser Raqe Alqhtani. "The need for socket preservation: a systematic review." Journal of Medicine and Life 15, no. 3 (March 2022): 309–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.25122/jml-2021-0308.

Full text

Abstract:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical need and impact of socket preservation to protect the bone for future dental implant placement. Moreover, we aimed to list down various methods of socket preservation by going through randomized clinical trials. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases for all relevant publications, where researchers compared various methods and tools for socket preservation. All eight randomized controlled trials mentioned several methods that are helpful in preserving bone levels both horizontally and vertically. The studies included in this systematic review demonstrate that each material has certain efficacy in preserving the socket after tooth extraction for future implant placement. Socket preservation methods and materials are effective in preparing patients for future prostheses.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Wang, C. W., S. H. Yu, T. Fretwurst, L. Larsson, J. V. Sugai, J. Oh, K. Lehner, Q. Jin, and W. V. Giannobile. "Maresin 1 Promotes Wound Healing and Socket Bone Regeneration for Alveolar Ridge Preservation." Journal of Dental Research 99, no. 8 (May 8, 2020): 930–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022034520917903.

Full text

Abstract:

Tooth extraction results in alveolar bone resorption and is accompanied by postoperative swelling and pain. Maresin 1 (MaR1) is a proresolving lipid mediator produced by macrophages during the resolution phase of inflammation, bridging healing and tissue regeneration. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of MaR1 on tooth extraction socket wound healing in a preclinical rat model. The maxillary right first molars of Sprague-Dawley rats were extracted, and gelatin scaffolds were placed into the sockets with or without MaR1. Topical application was also given twice a week until complete socket wound closure up to 14 d. Immediate postoperative pain was assessed by 3 scores. Histology and microcomputed tomography were used to assess socket bone fill and alveolar ridge dimensional changes at selected dates. The assessments of coded specimens were performed by masked, calibrated examiners. Local application of MaR1 potently accelerated extraction socket healing. Macroscopic and histologic analysis revealed a reduced soft tissue wound opening and more rapid re-epithelialization with MaR1 delivery versus vehicle on socket healing. Under micro–computed tomography analysis, MaR1 (especially at 0.05 μg/μL) stimulated greater socket bone fill at day 10 as compared with the vehicle-treated animals, resulting in less buccal plate resorption and a wider alveolar ridge by day 21. Interestingly, an increased ratio of CD206+:CD68+ macrophages was identified in the sockets with MaR1 application under immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence analysis. As compared with the vehicle therapy, local delivery of MaR1 reduced immediate postoperative surrogate pain score panels. In summary, MaR1 accelerated extraction wound healing, promoted socket bone fill, preserved alveolar ridge bone, and reduced postoperative pain in vivo with a rodent preclinical model. Local administration of MaR1 offers clinical potential to accelerate extraction socket wound healing for more predictable dental implant reconstruction.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Adhikari, Khushbu, A. Tandukar, B. Kumar, and B. Khanal. "Utilizing a Bioscaffold for Socket Preservation: A Case Report." Journal of Nepalese Prosthodontic Society 1, no. 1 (June 30, 2018): 52–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jnprossoc.v1i1.23851.

Full text

Abstract:

Socket preservation technique preserves the soft and the hard tissues after tooth extraction; hence minimizing the need for any augmentation procedures in the future. Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) enhances the osteogenic differentiation and the healing process so can be utilised for socket preservation. This is a case report of utilizing PRF in combination with hydroxyapatite crystals in an extracted socket, to preserve the future implant site. The tooth was extracted atraumatically and the socket was thoroughly debrided. Venous blood was collected from the patient’s antecubital fossa and PRF was prepared immediately by centrifuging the collected blood at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes. A mixture of hydroxyapatite and PRF was placed in the socket; covered by a PRF membrane and sutured with 3-0 silk suture. The radiographic and clinical evaluation demonstrated satisfactory regeneration of bone and soft tissue. Socket preservation technique using PRF and hydroxyapatite is an effective method for achieving sound bone and tissue for implant placement.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Lyu, Chengqi, Zhengwei Shao, Derong Zou, and Jiayu Lu. "Ridge Alterations following Socket Preservation Using a Collagen Membrane in Dogs." BioMed Research International 2020 (March 4, 2020): 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1487681.

Full text

Abstract:

Background. The healing process following tooth extraction results in alveolar ridge resorption. The dimensional changes may complicate the subsequent implant procedure. Socket preservation using absorbable collagen membranes or a combination of membranes with calcium phosphate cement (CPC) particles might ensure that the alveolar ridge retains a suitable morphology for implant placement. Objective. To evaluate the quality and quantity of new bone regenerated after application of either collagen membranes alone covering the sockets or a combination of membranes with CPC particles added into the sockets in dogs. Materials and Methods. Six dogs were included in this study. The mandibular premolars were extracted. For each hemimandible, three premolar extraction sites were randomly assigned to one of the following treatments: a covering collagen membrane, CPC with a covering collagen membrane, and a socket left empty. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements, polyfluorochrome sequential labeling, and histological assessments were performed to investigate the healing ability and repair processes within a 6-month observation period. Results. Buccal bone height in the membrane group was significantly higher than that in the membrane+CPC and blank groups at 4 and 6 months after extraction. The mineral apposition rate over 2-4 months and the alizarin red-stained area in the membrane group were significantly higher than those in the other two groups. Histological analysis after 6 months of healing showed significantly higher amounts of newly formed bone in the membrane group than in the other groups. Conclusion. Extraction sites treated with collagen barrier membranes showed better protection than sites not covered with membranes. And the buccal bone wall of the socket was well preserved by collagen membrane without extra CPC materials. Socket preservation using absorbable membranes alone yielded better quality and quantity of regenerated bone inside the socket site.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Kauffmann, Frederic, Christian Höhne, Alexandre Thomas Assaf, Tobias Vollkommer, Jan Semmusch, Aline Reitmeier, Jamal Michel Stein, Max Heiland, Ralf Smeets, and Rico Rutkowski. "The Influence of Local Pamidronate Application on Alveolar Dimensional Preservation after Tooth Extraction—An Animal Experimental Study." International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 10 (May 20, 2020): 3616. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21103616.

Full text

Abstract:

The aim of this randomized, controlled animal exploratory trial was to investigate the influence of local application of aminobisphosphonate pamidronate during the socket preservation procedure. Mandibular premolars were extracted in five Göttingen minipigs. Two animals underwent socket preservation using BEGO OSS (n = 8 sockets) and three animals using BEGO OSS + Pamifos (15 mg) (n = 12 sockets). After jaw impression, cast models (baseline, eight weeks postoperative) were digitized using an inLab X5 scanner (Dentsply Sirona) and the generated STL data were superimposed and analyzed with GOM Inspect 2018 (GOM, Braunschweig). After 16 weeks, the lower jaws were prepared and examined using standard histological methods. In the test group (BEGO OSS + pamidronate), buccooral dimensional loss was significantly lower, both vestibulary (−0.80 ± 0.57 mm vs. −1.92 ± 0.63 mm; p = 0.00298) and lingually (−1.36 ± 0.58 mm vs. −2.56 ± 0.65 mm; p = 0.00104) compared with the control group (BEGO OSS). The test group showed a significant difference between vestibular and lingual dimensional loss (p = 0.04036). Histology showed cortical and cancellous bone in the alveolar sockets without signs of local inflammation. Adjuvant application of pamidronate during socket preservation reduces alveolar dimensional loss significantly. Further investigations with regard to dose–response relationships, volume effects, side effects, and a verification of the suitability in combination with other bone substitute materials (BSMs) are necessary.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Khabadze, Zurab, Oleg Mordanov, Marina Dashtieva, Ia Todua, Julia Generalova, Artemy Nedashkovsky, Meri Sheroziia, Saida Adbulkerimova, and Yusup Bakaev. "Immediate Autogenous Extracted Tooth as a Grafting Material For Fresh Socket Preservation: a Systematic Review." Journal of Oral Research 10, no. 3 (June 30, 2021): 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.17126/joralres.2021.027.

Full text

Abstract:

Objectives: To evaluate the use of extracted autogenous teeth for socket preservation after tooth extraction. Material and Methods: Cochrane, Scopus, and PubMed databases search was conducted to identify human clinical studies reporting the clinical, radiographic and/or histological outcomes of socket preservation techniques with autogenous extracted tooth Only studies published in English language in the last 10 years were included in the study. Results: In total, 82 articles were identified. Five articles were included in the review. They included 58 teeth that were prepared as a graft for socket preservation. The grafts derived from autogenous teeth were presented in three forms: particles, blocks and powder. The mean bone loss ranged from 0.28 mm to 0.41mm in height and 0.15 mm in width.Conclusion: Immediate autogenous extracted tooth as a grafting material for fresh socket preservation is promising for future daily clinical practice. More clinical comparative studies are needed.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Schnutenhaus, Sigmar, Werner Götz, Jens Dreyhaupt, Heike Rudolph, and Ralph G. Luthardt. "Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Histomorphometric Analysis." Open Dentistry Journal 12, no. 1 (October 30, 2018): 916–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601812010916.

Full text

Abstract:

Objective: This study presents the histomorphometric findings after tooth extraction with and without Alveolar Ridge Preservation (ARP) with a collagen cone filling the socket in combination with a collagen membrane covering the socket. Materials and Methods: In a controlled randomized clinical study, 10 patients were treated with the combination material after tooth extraction. In 10 patients, the extraction sockets were left to heal without further intervention. Soft tissue, new bone formation, bone quality and bone remodeling, blood flow vascularization, and inflammation were evaluated histomorphometrically. This was performed (semi-) quantitatively using a blinded protocol. Results: The statistical evaluation showed no significant difference for any parameter. When the combination material was used, more pronounced remodeling, increased osteoblast activity, and increased vascularization were demonstrated based on the histomorphometric findings. In contrast, there were reduced levels of osteogenesis and less mineralization. There was slightly more bundle bone in patients with ARP. Conclusion: The histomorphometric analysis of ARP with a combination material consisting of a collagen cone and a collagen membrane showed no significant differences in terms of new bone formation and bone quality. Descriptively, however, different manifestations were seen that might benefit from being documented using larger samples and being tested for clinical relevance.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Ivanova, Vasilena, Ivan Chenchev, Stefan Zlatev, and Eitan Mijiritsky. "Comparison Study of the Histomorphometric Results after Socket Preservation with PRF and Allograft Used for Socket Preservation—Randomized Controlled Trials." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 14 (July 13, 2021): 7451. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147451.

Full text

Abstract:

The aim of the present clinical study was to assess and compare the histomorphometric results and efficacy of freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) in combination with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), and PRF as a sole grafting material for socket preservation. Ninety patients in need of tooth extraction and implant restoration were included in this study. The participants were randomly divided into three groups based on post-extraction clinical protocol: socket preservation procedure with allograft in combination with a PRF membrane (PRFm), PRF as a sole grafting material, and a control group. A total of 90 implants were placed four months post-extraction. During the surgical re-entry a bone biopsy was harvested with a trephine drill. Histological samples were prepared and analyzed for percentage vital bone and connective tissue. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc analysis were used to assess the results. Both test groups revealed a significantly higher percentage of vital bone formation compared to the control group. No statistically significant differences regarding vital bone formation and connective tissue quantity between the tested groups were observed (FDBA + PRFm: 3.29 ± 13.03%; and PRF: 60.79 ± 9.72%). From a clinical and histological point of view, both materials in the test groups are suitable for the filling of post-extraction sockets without bone defects. Both of the tested groups revealed a significantly higher percentage of vital bone formation compared to the control group.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Das, Swati, Rajesh Jhingran, Vivek Kumar Bains, Rohit Madan, Ruchi Srivastava, and Iram Rizvi. "Socket preservation by beta-tri-calcium phosphate with collagen compared to platelet-rich fibrin: A clinico-radiographic study." European Journal of Dentistry 10, no. 02 (April 2016): 264–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.178298.

Full text

Abstract:

ABSTRACT Objectives: This study was primarily designed to determine the clinico-radiographic efficacy of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and beta-tri-calcium phosphate with collagen (β-TCP-Cl) in preserving extraction sockets. Materials and Methods: For Group I (PRF), residual sockets (n = 15) were filled with autologous PRF obtained from patients’ blood; and for Group II (β-TCP-Cl), residual sockets (n = 15) were filled with β-TCP-Cl. For the sockets randomly selected for Group II (β-TCP-Cl), the reshaped Resorbable Tissue Replacement cone was inserted into the socket. Results: Clinically, there was a significantly greater decrease in relative socket depth, but apposition in midcrestal height in Group II (β-TCP-Cl) as compared to Group I (PRF), whereas more decrease in buccolingual width of Group I (PRF) than Group II (β-TCP-Cl) after 6 months. Radiographically, the mean difference in socket height, residual ridge, and width (coronal, middle, and apical third of socket) after 6 months was higher in Group I (PRF) as compared to Group II (β-TCP-Cl). The mean density (in Hounsfield Units) at coronal, middle, and apical third of socket was higher in Group I (PRF) as compared to Group II (β-TCP-Cl). There were statistically significant apposition and resorption for Group I (PRF) whereas nonsignificant resorption and significant apposition for Group II (β-TCP-Cl) in buccal and lingual/palatal cortical plate, respectively, at 6 months on computerized tomography scan. Conclusion: The use of either autologous PRF or β-TCP-Cl was effective in socket preservation. Results obtained from PRF were almost similar to β-TCP-Cl; therefore being autologous, nonimmune, cost-effective, easily procurable regenerative biomaterial, PRF proves to be an insight into the future biofuel for regeneration.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Kar, Mahadeepa, Ashish Gupta, N. Srinath, Umashankar DN, Mahesh Kumar, and Ankita Dahiya. "Autogenous Demineralized Dentin Matrix Graft for Socket Preservation." Acta Scientific Dental Scienecs 5, no. 4 (March 29, 2021): 214–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.31080/asds.2021.05.1087.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Kotsakis, G., Nicolas Markou, Vanessa Chrepa, Vasiliki Krompa, and Anastasios Kotsakis. "Alveolar Ridge Preservation Utilizing the ‘Socket-Plug’ Technique." International Journal of Oral Implantology & Clinical Research 3, no. 1 (2012): 24–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10012-1060.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Veleska-Stevkovska, D., B. Evrosimovska, M. Peeva–Petreska, G. Apostolova, M. Petkov, P. Aleksova, and D. Stefanovik. "PRF supported socket preservation – a predictable implant outcome." Македонски стоматолошки преглед 42, no. 3 (2019): 98–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.55302/msp19423098vs.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Ebenezer, ElsieSunitha, Jananni Muthu, Pratebha Balu, and RSaravana Kumar. "Socket preservation techniques: An overview with literature review." SRM Journal of Research in Dental Sciences 13, no. 3 (2022): 115. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/srmjrds.srmjrds_79_22.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Park, Jang-Yeol, Ki-Tae Koo, Tae-Il Kim, Yang-Jo Seol, Yong-Moo Lee, Young Ku, In-Chul Rhyu, and Chong-Pyoung Chung. "Socket preservation using deproteinized horse-derived bone mineral." Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science 40, no. 5 (2010): 227. http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2010.40.5.227.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Jackson, Brian J., and Iyad Morcos. "Socket Grafting: A Predictable Technique for Site Preservation." Journal of Oral Implantology 33, no. 6 (December 2007): 353–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2007)33[353:sgaptf]2.0.co;2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Pathak, Tushar Sakal, Himani Swatantrakumar Gupta, Kamedh Yashwant Chowdhary, Vineet Vaman Kini, and Abhishek Mistry. "Socket Preservation at Molar Site using Platelet Rich Fibrin and Bioceramics for Implant Site Development." Journal of Contemporary Dentistry 3, no. 2 (2013): 102–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10031-1046.

Full text

Abstract:

ABSTRACT Background The extraction socket preservation technique conserves the alveolar architecture and prevents hard and soft tissue collapse that minimizes the necessity for future augmentation procedures. Also, considerable interest has recently emerged over the potential benefits of using platelet rich fibrin (PRF), a highly concentrated form of platelets power packed with growth factors encased in a leukocyte rich matrix that enhances osteogenic differentiation and bone repair. This article describes the currently improved technique utilizing alloplasts with autologous PRF to be implemented for preserving a future implant site. Materials and Methods Following the atraumatic extraction of the periodontally compromised tooth, the socket bony walls were debrided and decorticated to facilitate regional acceleratory phenomenon. Venous blood was drawn from the antecubital fossa of the patient and was centrifuged according to Choukroun's method to yield autologous PRF that was minced into uniformly sized bits. Except for 2 to 3 mm of the coronal aspect of the socket, the rest was filled with particles of a slowly resorbing bone substitute material mixed homogeneously with minced PRF. A collagen membrane was used to seal the coronal end of the socket and was stabilized using 3-0 black braided silk sutures. Results Clinically and radiographically satisfactory and successful regeneration of the deficient ridge's hard and soft tissues was demonstrated after 6 months post therapy. Conclusion Socket preservation surgery utilizing bioceramics and PRF is an effective procedure for posterior socket preservation coupled with rapid healing and aids in providing sound bone quality for successful implant placement. How to cite this article Gupta HS, Chowdhary KY, Pathak TS, Kini VV, Pereira R, Mistry A. Socket Preservation at Molar Site using Platelet Rich Fibrin and Bioceramics for Implant Site Development. J Contemp Dent 2013;3(2):102-107.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Mahesh, Lanka, TV Narayan, Praful Bali, and Sagrika Shukla. "Socket Preservation with Alloplast: Discussion and a Descriptive Case." Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 13, no. 6 (2012): 934–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1257.

Full text

Abstract:

ABSTRACT Soon after tooth extraction the bone resorption takes place reducing the height and width of alveolar ridge. This produces an altered morphology of the bone unfavorable for implant placement and implant placement becomes impossible without surgical correction. Socket grafting maintains and preserves ridge for implant placement. How to cite this article Mahesh L, Narayan TV, Bali P, Shukla S. Socket Preservation with Alloplast: Discussion and a Descriptive Case. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012;13(6):934-937.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Pagni, Giorgio, Gaia Pellegrini, William V. Giannobile, and Giulio Rasperini. "Postextraction Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Biological Basis and Treatments." International Journal of Dentistry 2012 (2012): 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/151030.

Full text

Abstract:

Following tooth extraction, the alveolar ridge undergoes an inevitable remodeling process that influences implant therapy of the edentulous area. Socket grafting is a commonly adopted therapy for the preservation of alveolar bone structures in combination or not with immediate implant placement although the biological bases lying behind this treatment modality are not fully understood and often misinterpreted. This review is intended to clarify the literature support to socket grafting in order to provide practitioners with valid tools to make a conscious decision of when and why to recommend this therapy.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Segnini, Bruno, Fausto Borges-Filho, Lélis Nicoli, Marcelo Gonçalves, Cláudio Marcantonio, Guilherme Oliveira, and Elcio Marcantonio. "Impact of soft tissue graft on the preservation of compromised sockets: a randomized controlled clinical pilot study." Acta Odontológica Latinoamericana 34, no. 2 (September 2021): 119–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.54589/aol.34/2/119.

Full text

Abstract:

The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the impact of the association of free gingival graft (FGG) or collagen-matrix xenograft (CMX) to deproteinized bovine bone graft (DBBG) on the preservation of post-extraction sockets with facial-wall defects. Sixteen patients who presented a maxillary tooth with a facial bone defect and indication of extraction were selected. After the surgical procedure, all the post-extraction sockets were filled with DBBG and covered with a collagen membrane. The cervical part of the socket was then sealed with either FGG or CMX. Clinical and tomographic analyses were performed at baseline and 4 months after the grafting procedure. The FGG sockets showed higher values for the width of the bone ridge than the CMX sockets at 4 months. There was no difference regarding biopsy composition. In conclusion, regardless of the type of soft tissue graft used, socket preservation with DBBG at sites presenting facial bone defects enabled implant placement without further guided bone regeneration, whether the sockets were sealed with FGG or CMX.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Ashurko, Igor, Nataliia Blagushina, Anisa Borodiy, and Mary Magdalyanova. "Hard and Soft Tissue Augmentation with Single-Implant Restoration in the Esthetic Zone." Case Reports in Dentistry 2021 (November 17, 2021): 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5737665.

Full text

Abstract:

The removal of the central incisor of the upper jaw is a challenging process, since the restoration of a single implant in the esthetic zone is of great responsibility. When tooth extraction with immediate implant placement is not possible, modern protocols imply the use of the socket preservation technique. This method of preserving socket properties significantly reduces changes that occur during the healing process of the postextracted area and along with soft tissue augmentation allows to achieve a satisfying aesthetic result. The aim of present case report is to assess capabilities of socket preservation concept and application of soft tissue augmentation in the anterior maxillary region. The treatment steps of a 35-year-old woman who needed to remove tooth 11 with further dental implant placement are described. The clinical case is of interest because after socket preservation and soft tissue augmentation, an acceptable aesthetic result was not reached. However, additional soft tissue augmentation made it possible to achieve the desired result, which was stable for 7 years.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Kaushal, Ashadeep, Kanwarjit Singh Asi, Ajay Mahajan, and Vindeshwari Bhatia. "Can Platelet Rich Fibrin enhance the role of alloplastic bone graft in socket preservation: A Randomized Clinical Trial." IP International Journal of Periodontology and Implantology 7, no. 4 (November 15, 2022): 180–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.18231/j.ijpi.2022.037.

Full text

Abstract:

Socket preservation aims at limiting the resorptive events that occurs as a consequence of tooth extraction. Besides the use of autologous and commercially available graft materials, there has been an increasing shift towards the utilization of biological substitutes like Platelet Rich Fibrin for socket preservation. : A randomized clinical trial was conducted in fourteen extraction sites, out of which seven were filled with alloplastic bone graft material alone (control group) and rest were filled with alloplastic bone graft material along with PRF (test group). The sites were assessed clinically and radiographically at baseline and six months post treatment. The mean +/- SD was calculated for alveolar ridge width and height. Although alveolar ridge width and height reduced significantly in the span of six months in both test and control groups, there was no statistically significant intergroup difference in both groups at six months post treatment in these parameters. Wound healing was comparatively better in the test group compared to the control group initially, but at the end of the study period both groups attained same level of healing. Even though alveolar socket preservation has a clinically significant effect on preserving the residual ridge dimensions, use of PRF as an adjunct to alloplastic bone graft in socket preservation procedure has no additional benefit over alloplastic bone graft material alone.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Gholami, Gholam, Maryam Aghaloo, Farzin Ghanavati, Reza Amid, and Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh. "Three dimensional socket preservation: a technique for soft tissue augmentation along with socket grafting." Annals of Surgical Innovation and Research 6, no. 1 (2012): 3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-1164-6-3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

van Orten, Andreas, Werner Goetz, and Hakan Bilhan. "Tooth-Derived Granules in Combination with Platelet-Rich Fibrin (“Sticky Tooth”) in Socket Preservation: A Histological Evaluation." Dentistry Journal 10, no. 2 (February 16, 2022): 29. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj10020029.

Full text

Abstract:

Background: The maintenance of ridge volume following tooth extraction has gained more importance in the last few years. This clinical study aimed to assess the impact of autologous dentin particles mixed with injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) on a sticky tooth mixture for socket preservation in terms of consecutive need for horizontal guided bone regeneration and histological findings. Methods: Eight extraction sockets in seven patients were included in this study. Autologous dentin particles were mixed with PRF, filled in the sockets, and covered with a cross-linked collagen membrane exposed to the oral cavity and fixated by crisscross sutures. An orthopantomogram was taken before the first surgical procedure and a CBCT prior to static computer-aided implant surgery. At the time of implant placement, cores were harvested with the aid of a trephine for histological examinations for every preserved socket. Results: No further horizontal GBR intervention was required in any cases, and the histological findings were unremarkable. The new bone was mostly cancellous and in direct contact with the remaining dentin granules. Conclusions: Within the limits of this clinical study, it may be concluded that this method is valuable for socket preservation and obtaining vital and good quality bone structure. The sticky tooth technique seems to be very efficient despite the more complex equipment.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Kotsakis, Georgios, Vanessa Chrepa, Nicolas Marcou, Hari Prasad, and James Hinrichs. "Flapless Alveolar Ridge Preservation Utilizing the “Socket-Plug” Technique: Clinical Technique and Review of the Literature." Journal of Oral Implantology 40, no. 6 (December 1, 2014): 690–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-12-00028.

Full text

Abstract:

It has been documented that after every extraction of one or more teeth, the alveolar bone of the respective region undergoes resorption and atrophy. Therefore, ridge preservation techniques are often employed after tooth extraction to limit this phenomenon. The benefits of a flapless procedure include maintenance of the buccal keratinized gingiva, prevention of alterations to the gingival contours, and migration of the mucogingival junction that are often experienced after raising a flap. The purpose of this article is to review the literature concerning flapless ridge preservation techniques with the aid of collagen plugs for occlusion of the socket. The term “socket-plug” technique is introduced to describe these techniques. The basic steps of the “socket-plug” technique consist of atraumatic tooth extraction, placement of the appropriate biomaterials in the extraction site, preservation of soft tissue architecture employing a flapless technique, and placement and stabilization of the collagen plug. A case example is presented that illustrates the steps used in this technique.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Elkhatib, Mostafa, and Tarek Abd El-Samad. "Evaluation of Socket Preservation Using A Synthetic Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatite." Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal 3, no. 1 (April 1, 2020): 43–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.21608/aadj.2020.92939.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Wei, Yiping, Tao Xu, Wenjie Hu, Liping Zhao, Cui Wang, and Kwok-Hung Chung. "Socket Preservation Following Extraction of Molars with Severe Periodontitis." International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry 41, no. 2 (March 2021): 269–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/prd.4444.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

El Ghazawy, Nora, Iman Helmy, and Maha Hakam. "POSTERIOR MAXILLARY SOCKET PRESERVATION USING COLLAGENATED CORTICO-CANCELLOUS XENOGRAFT." Egyptian Dental Journal 62, no. 1 (January 1, 2016): 901–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.21608/edj.2016.95221.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Deliverska, Elitsa, Ioanna Polichroniadou, and Payam Forghani. "The use of dentin autograft in socket preservation procedure." Journal of Medical and Dental Practice 5, no. 3 (November 15, 2018): 920–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.18044/medinform.201853.920.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Perelli, Michele, Roberto Abundo, Giuseppe Corrente, Carlo Saccone, and Marta Zambelli. "Implant-Supported Prostheses Esthetic Outcomes After Socket Preservation Technique." Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 26, no. 3 (May 2015): 729–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000001602.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Vittorini Orgeas, Gianluca, Marco Clementini, Valeria De Risi, and Massimo de Sanctis. "Surgical Techniques for Alveolar Socket Preservation: A Systematic Review." International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 28, no. 4 (2013): 1049–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2670.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Caiazzo, Alfonso, Federico Brugnami, and Pushkar Mehra. "Buccal Plate Augmentation: A New Alternative to Socket Preservation." Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 68, no. 10 (October 2010): 2503–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.05.044.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Tomasetti, B. "Socket preservation using non-bovine, non-human graft material." International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 34 (January 2005): 123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0901-5027(05)81363-3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Anderson, William, and Andrew Pye. "Management of the extraction socket and alveolar ridge preservation." Dental Update 46, no. 2 (February 2, 2019): 151–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/denu.2019.46.2.151.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Moraschini, V., and E. dos S. P. Barboza. "Quality assessment of systematic reviews on alveolar socket preservation." International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 45, no. 9 (September 2016): 1126–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2016.03.010.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

R, Fathima Banu, and Anand Kumar V. "Challenges in management of extraction socket with an implant and alloplast - A Case series." JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PROSTHODONTICS AND IMPLANTOLOGY 2, no. 2 (December 30, 2020): 6–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.55995/j-cpi.2020008.

Full text

Abstract:

Extraction of tooth is followed by physiological events that lead to the resorption of the ridge and difficulty in prosthetic management. Socket preservation is a highlighted area of clinical management and this case series presents the management of extraction sockets in various types of defects and the long-term outcome of the treatment

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Minetti, Elio, Silvio Taschieri, and Stefano Corbella. "Autologous Deciduous Tooth-Derived Material for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Clinical and Histological Case Report." Case Reports in Dentistry 2020 (June 18, 2020): 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/2936878.

Full text

Abstract:

The management of the alveolar socket is fundamental to create conditions that would allow the positioning of dental implants in the same site, when required. A number of biomaterials were described in scientific literature to be used for alveolar socket preservation immediately after tooth extraction: autogenous grafts, allograft (of various origin), and synthetic products. Among the autogenous biomaterials, some authors proposed the use of autogenous dentin and/or enamel, retrieved from teeth, adequately managed, and purified. The present case report with two-year follow-up shows one case of alveolar socket preservation by using tooth graft material that was subsequently treated with one implant-supported rehabilitation in the same site. The paper presents clinical and histological outcomes and confirms the feasibility of adopting such autogenous biomaterial in standard procedures.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Testori, Tiziano, Matteo Antonio Deflorian, Federico Mandelli, Giulia Attardo, Carlo Maiorana, Massimo Del Fabbro, and Raffaele Vinci. "Healing of Post-Extraction Sockets Filled with Anorganic Bovine Bone and Covered with a Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix. Radiological 2D and 3D Results of a Pilot Study to Assess Dimensional Stability." Materials 14, no. 10 (May 11, 2021): 2473. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14102473.

Full text

Abstract:

Analysis of short-term results regarding dimensional stability of post-extraction sockets managed via a preservation protocol using deproteinized bovine bone matrix and a xenogeneic collagen matrix. Materials and methods Fifteen patients needing extraction of one single-rooted premolar tooth were treated in a pilot study. Five patients were treated in each centre. After tooth extraction, sockets were filled with anorganic bovine bone matrix and covered with a xenogeneic collagen matrix. Six months later, implants were placed. Dimensional changes in the treated sites were digitally evaluated using the best-fit superimposition of pre-and post-socket preservation models. Results After six months of healing, the vertical reduction of the grafted sites was 0.31 ± 0.24 mm (p < 0.001). Volumetric analysis of superimposed models showed an average palatal-lingual contraction of 0.33 ± 0.51 mm3 (p = 0.02). At the vestibular level, the average contraction was found to be 0.8 ± 0.3 mm3 (p < 0.001). Finally, the analysis of linear variations in the treated sites on a single sagittal section at the crystal level, and at 3 and 7 mm apically respect to the crest, both towards the vestibule and palate, generally showed more marked resorption at the crestal level compared to apical measurements. Conclusion: The clinical protocol herein employed for socket preservation showed a positive effect in preventing the physiological post-extraction remodeling.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Sargolzaie, Naser, Mehrnaz Rafiee, Hamideh Salari Sedigh, Reza Zare Mahmoudabadi, and Hooman Keshavarz. "Comparison of the effect of hemihydrate calcium sulfate granules and Cerabone on dental socket preservation: An animal experiment." Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects 12, no. 4 (December 19, 2018): 238–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2018.037.

Full text

Abstract:

Background. Early bone loss due to tooth extraction can be significantly reduced by socket preservation. The aim of this study was to compare the in vivo effects of hemihydrate calcium sulfate granules (an alloplastic material) and Cerabone (a bovine-derived xenograft) on socket preservation in dogs. Methods. Six male Mongrel dogs were randomly divided into 2 groups (n=3) for sacrificing and histological evaluation 4 and 8 weeks after a surgery. The second and third premolars on both sides of the lower jaw were extracted surgically. The sockets on one side were filled with Cerabone, and with calcium sulfate on the opposite side. In the slides, the ratio of the area of newly formed bone to the area of the entire cavity, and the ratio of the area of fibrous connective tissue to the area of the entire cavity were measured. The presence of inflammation was also examined. Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Sign test and McNemar test were used for statistical analyses (ɑ=0.05). Results. The means of new bone proportion were 11% and 8% for Cerabone and calcium sulfate, respectively (P=0.58). The means of connective tissue proportion were 29% and 33% for Cerabone and calcium sulfate, respectively (P=0.72). No inflammatory cells were observed in the Cerabone group, although 50% of the samples in the calcium sulfate group showed inflammation (P=0.50). Conclusion. The effects of calcium sulfate and Cerabone on socket preservation in dogs on bone formation, fibrous connective tissue and inflammation levels were not significantly different at 4- and 8-week postoperative intervals.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Campione, Francesco, Ludovica Campione, Mario Francesco Campione, Michele Melillo, Claudia Arena, Francesc Abella, and Luca Boschini. "Root Membrane Replantation as an Alternative Technique for the Socket Preservation." Case Reports in Dentistry 2022 (May 2, 2022): 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7455050.

Full text

Abstract:

Background and Overview. Socket shield is a technique that allows the maintenance of tissue volumes. In the reported clinical case, the replantation of the buccal root fragment mistakenly extracted during a socket shield surgery is performed. We present a follow-up to 5 years with an unexpected healing.Case Description. An 88-year-old patient underwent an immediate loading implant placement associated with the replantation of the mistakenly extracted root fragment. The shaping of the fragment was performed extraorally, and the replantation was done so that the fragment protruded above the crest margin.Conclusions and Practical Implications. The 5-year follow-up shows an uneventful healing of the implant. At 48 months, postoperative CBCT exam reports images compatible with the regeneration of the bone over the portion of root that protruded over the margin. The outcome suggests clinical implications, as the opportunity to easily shape the fragment extraorally and replant sound portion of the root (not necessary the buccal) in buccal socket with bone defect.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Al-Hezaimi, Khalid, Giovanna Iezzi, Ivan Rudek, Abdullah Al-Daafas, Khalid Al-Hamdan, Abdulaziz Al-Rasheed, Fawad Javed, Adriano Piattelli, and Hom-Lay Wang. "Histomorphometric Analysis of Bone Regeneration Using a Dual Layer of Membranes (dPTFE Placed Over Collagen) in Fresh Extraction Sites: A Canine Model." Journal of Oral Implantology 41, no. 2 (April 1, 2015): 188–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-13-00027.

Full text

Abstract:

In untreated extraction sockets, buccal bone remodeling compromises the alveolar ridge width. The aim of this study was to histologically assess the efficacy of using a dual layer of membranes (high-density polytetrafluoroethylene [dPTFE] placed over collagen) for ridge preservation in fresh extraction sites. Eight beagle dogs were used. After endodontic treatment of mandibular bilateral second (P2), third (P3), and fourth (P4) premolars, mandibular bilateral first premolars and distal roots of P2, P3, and P4 were extracted atraumatically. Animals were randomly divided into 4 treatment groups. group 1, the control group, received no treatment; in group 2, allograft was placed in the alveolum and the socket covered with dPTFE membrane; in group 3, allograft was placed in the alveolum, the buccal plate was overbuilt with allograft, and the socket was covered with dPTFE membrane; in group 4, allograft was placed in the alveolum and covered with dual layer of membranes (dPTFE placed over collagen). No intent of primary closure was performed for all groups. After 16 weeks, the animals were sacrificed and mandibular blocks were assessed histologically for buccolingual width of alveolar ridge, percentage of bone formation and bone marrow spaces, and the remaining bone particles. The buccolingual width of the alveolar ridge was significantly higher among sockets in group 4 than in group 1 (P < .05). the amount of newly formed bone in each socket was higher in extraction sockets in group 4 than in groups 1, 2, and 3 (P < .001). A significant difference was found in the percentage of bone marrow spaces among all groups (P < .001). No significant difference was found in the number of nonresorbed bone particles among the groups. Using a dual layer of membrane was more effective in ridge preservation than conventional socket augmentation protocols.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Red’ko, Nikolay A., Aleksey Yu Drobyshev, and Dmitry A. Lezhnev. "Socket Preservation During Preimplantation Period: Effi cacy of Osteoplastic Material Application Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography." Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin 26, no. 6 (December 19, 2019): 70–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2019-26-6-70-79.

Full text

Abstract:

Aim. To analyse the effi ciency of osteoplastic material application in order to reduce the resorption level after tooth extraction in the preimplantation period according to the data of cone beam computed tomography.Materials and methods. The study involved 80 patients who were divided into 4 equal groups depending on the preservation material used. The fi rst group was treated with Cerabone (Botiss, Germany) xenomaterial based on natural bovine bone. Plasma enriched with PRGF growth factors obtained by the BTI Endoret (Spain) technology was used for the patients of the second group. The third group consisted of patients who underwent a socket preservation of the extracted tooth with a powdered autologous dentin matrix (ADM) obtained from their own tooth. In the fourth group, bone-plastic material based on hydroxyapatite with Collapan-L lincomycin hydrochloride (Intermedapatit, Russia) was used to prevent socket resorption. All patients had a cone beam computed tomography of the maxillofacial region before the extraction and 3 months after the preservation in order to evaluate the level of bone resorption. After the installation of dental implants, a comparative assessment of the bone resorption level in the vertical and horizontal directions before tooth extraction and in the preimplantation period was carried out.Results. The smallest level of vertical bone resorption after socket preservation was observed in group 1 (Cerabone) and group 3 (ADM). The median value of the socket resorption level in group 1 was 0.7 mm (8.54 %) in the vertical direction and 0.5 mm (9.45 %) in horizontal measurement as compared to the level of bone tissue before tooth extraction. Similar indicators were observed in the group using an autologous dentin matrix. The vertical decrease in the socket bone tissue was 0.61 mm (7.75 %), horizontal — 0.51 mm (6.2 %). The level of bone resorption was signifi cantly higher using two other materials.Conclusions. The use of three-dimensional radiation research methods allows a comprehensive assessment of the bone tissue volume to be carried out, which in turn determines the choice of the dental implant size, the need for further bone-plastic surgery to increase the width/height of the alveolar ridge. The use of cone beam computed tomography showed that the most optimal results can be obtained by introducing Cerabone material into the socket of the extracted tooth, as well as using the innovative method of preservation with the patient’s own powdered tooth (ADM).

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Journal articles on the topic 'Socket preservation'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles