Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Socially desirable responding / Journal articles

Journal articles on the topic 'Socially desirable responding'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Socially desirable responding.

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 9 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Socially desirable responding.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

He, Jia, Fons J. R. van de Vijver, Alejandra Dominguez Espinosa, Amina Abubakar, Radosveta Dimitrova, Byron G. Adams, Arzu Aydinli, et al. "Socially Desirable Responding." Cross-Cultural Research 49, no. 3 (September 29, 2014): 227–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1069397114552781.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

McKibben, W. Bradley, and Paul J. Silvia. "Inattentive and Socially Desirable Responding." Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation 7, no. 1 (June 2016): 53–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2150137815613135.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Verkasalo, Markku, and Marjaana Lindeman. "Personal ideals and socially desirable responding." European Journal of Personality 8, no. 5 (December 1994): 385–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.2410080504.

Full text

Abstract:

The effect of personal ideals on socially desirable responding (impression management or IM, and self‐deception or SDE) was examined in a study of 428 undergraduate students. The subjects indicated their endorsement of 56 values and filled in Paulhus's (1991) Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding. Three IM types, viz. ingratiators, exemplificators, and intimidators, were defined from the subjects’ personal ideals. We hypothesized that both ingratiators and exemplificators score high and that intimidators score low on IM items. These hypotheses were confirmed, but the result for intimidators was only marginally reliable. Furthermore, it turned out that high IM scorers strove for collective values but high SDE scorers strove for individual values. The results are discussed as an expression of a self‐construction process, which is based on personal, rather than social, ideals. In addition, the implications of the results for controlling the effect of socially desirable responding are discussed.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Tracey, Terence J. G. "A note on socially desirable responding." Journal of Counseling Psychology 63, no. 2 (March 2016): 224–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/cou0000135.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

PAN, Yiqin, and Fang LUO. "Measurement and control of Socially Desirable Responding." Advances in Psychological Science 25, no. 10 (2017): 1664. http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1042.2017.01664.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Becker, Gilbert, and Stacey S. Cherny. "Gender-controlled measures of socially desirable responding." Journal of Clinical Psychology 50, no. 5 (September 1994): 746–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(199409)50:5<746::aid-jclp2270500512>3.0.co;2-v.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Ziegler, Matthias, and Markus Buehner. "Modeling Socially Desirable Responding and Its Effects." Educational and Psychological Measurement 69, no. 4 (October 15, 2008): 548–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164408324469.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Paulhus, Delroy L., and Douglas B. Reid. "Enhancement and denial in socially desirable responding." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60, no. 2 (1991): 307–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.307.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Meston, Cindy M., Julia R. Heiman, Paul D. Trapnell, and Delroy L. Paulhus. "Socially desirable responding and sexuality self‐reports." Journal of Sex Research 35, no. 2 (May 1998): 148–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224499809551928.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Lönnqvist, Jan-Erik, Sampo Paunonen, Annamari Tuulio-Henriksson, Jouko Lönnqvist, and Markku Verkasalo. "Substance and Style in Socially Desirable Responding." Journal of Personality 75, no. 2 (April 2007): 291–322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00440.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Kroner, Daryl G., and John R. Weekes. "Socially Desirable Responding and Offence Characteristics Among Rapists." Violence and Victims 11, no. 3 (January 1996): 263–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.11.3.263.

Full text

Abstract:

The relationship between socially desirable responding and offence characteristics is examined with 49 rapists. Socially desirable responding (SDR) was measured by the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding. Offence characteristics included: (a) perpetrator’s relationship to the victim; (b) severity of victim injury; and (c) victim’s age. Greater victim injury was associated with lower Impression Management (r = -.27, p<.03) and Denial scores (r = -.32, p<.01). No significant relationship occurred between offence characteristics and the self-deceptive scales of Denial of the Negative and Over Confident Rigidity. Alternative to the underreporting hypothesis, self-presentation and the acquisition of socially appropriate skills may explain the SDR/violence relationship.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Zerbe, Wilfred J., and Delroy L. Paulhus. "Socially Desirable Responding in Organizational Behavior: A Reconception." Academy of Management Review 12, no. 2 (April 1987): 250–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.1987.4307820.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Zerbe, Wilfred J., and Delroy L. Paulhus. "Socially Desirable Responding in Organizational Behavior: A Reconception." Academy of Management Review 12, no. 2 (April 1987): 250. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/258533.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Lönnqvist, Jan‐Erik, Markku Verkasalo, and Irina Bezmenova. "Agentic and communal bias in socially desirable responding." European Journal of Personality 21, no. 6 (October 2007): 853–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.639.

Full text

Abstract:

This research was designed to investigate Paulhus' communion management (CM) and self‐deceptive enhancement (SDE), socially desirable responding (SDR) scales as measures of general SDR, communal bias and agentic bias. The CM and SDE scales, as well as the Schwartz values survey (SVS), were administered to four samples drawn from different cultures and subcultures (N = 900). Participants completed the questionnaires in ‘honest’ and ‘fake good’ conditions. Although conceptions of which values were desirable varied strongly between samples and instructional sets, the CM scale was consistently related to general SDR and to communal bias. In contrast, the SDE scale was only related to general SDR. Contrary to expectations, neither scale could identify participants who ‘faked good’ under normal instructions. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Bensch, Doreen, Delroy L. Paulhus, Lazar Stankov, and Matthias Ziegler. "Teasing Apart Overclaiming, Overconfidence, and Socially Desirable Responding." Assessment 26, no. 3 (March 29, 2017): 351–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191117700268.

Full text

Abstract:

Contamination with positivity bias is a potential problem in virtually all areas of psychological assessment. To determine the impact of positivity bias, one common approach is to embed special indicators within one’s assessment battery. Such tools range from social desirability scales to overconfidence measures to the so-called overclaiming technique. Despite the large literature on these different approaches and underlying theoretical notions, little is known about the overall nomological network—in particular, the degree to which these constructs overlap. To this end, a broad spectrum of positivity bias detection tools was administered in low-stakes settings ( N = 798) along with measures of the Big Five, grandiose narcissism, and cognitive ability. Exploratory factor analyses revealed six first-order and two second-order factors. Overclaiming was not loaded by any of the six first-order factors and overconfidence was not explained by either of the two second-order factors. All other measures were confounded with personality and/or cognitive ability. Based on our findings, overclaiming is the most distinct potential indicator of positivity bias and independent of known personality measures.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Vésteinsdóttir, Vaka, Eva D. Steingrimsdottir, Adam Joinson, Ulf-Dietrich Reips, and Fanney Thorsdottir. "Social Desirability in Spouse Ratings." Psychological Reports 122, no. 2 (April 12, 2018): 593–608. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0033294118767815.

Full text

Abstract:

Whether or not socially desirable responding is a cause for concern in personality assessment has long been debated. For many researchers, McCrae and Costa laid the issue to rest when they showed that correcting for socially desirable responding in self-reports did not improve the agreement with spouse ratings on the Neuroticism, Extraversion, and Openness to Experience Personality Inventory. However, their findings rest on the assumption that observer ratings in general, and spouse ratings in particular, are an unbiased external criterion. If spouse ratings are also susceptible to socially desirable responding, correcting for the bias in self-rated measures cannot be assumed to increase agreement between self-reports and spouse ratings, and thus failure to do so should not be taken as evidence for the ineffectiveness of measuring and correcting for socially desirable responding. In the present study, McCrae and Costa’s influential study was replicated with the exception of measuring socially desirable responding with the Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability Scale, in both self-reports and spouse ratings. Analyses were based on responses from 70 couples who had lived together for at least one year. The results showed that both self-reports and spouse ratings are susceptible to socially desirable responding and thus McCrae and Costa’s conclusion is drawn into question.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Becker, Gilbert, and Stacey S. Cherny. "A FIVE-FACTOR NUCLEAR MODEL OF SOCIALLY DESIRABLE RESPONDING." Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal 20, no. 3 (January 1, 1992): 163–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1992.20.3.163.

Full text

Abstract:

We postulate a minimum of five group factors, each representing a specific content area or domain in which deception can be practised. Each group factor is determined by a general deception factor (delta) and a factor specific unto itself. The general factor favors greater sensitivity in females while a given specific factor may favor one gender, the other, or neither. The distinction between contents in general (alpha/gamma) and style (attribution/denial) is blurred in that a given group factor may underlie any mixture of items varying across the four combinations possible. We discuss the nature of delta in terms of genetic and environmental influences during early and later development.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Cervoni, Cynthia, Alyssa Singer, Jessica Lawson, Willo Wisotsky, and Charles Swencionis. "Socially Desirable Responding in the Bariatric Surgery Psychological Evaluation." Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases 13, no. 10 (October 2017): S38—S39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2017.09.082.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Reeves, Suzanne J., Mitul A. Mehta, Andrew J. Montgomery, Dimitri Amiras, Alice Egerton, Robert J. Howard, and Paul M. Grasby. "Striatal dopamine (D2) receptor availability predicts socially desirable responding." NeuroImage 34, no. 4 (February 2007): 1782–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.10.042.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Hopwood, Christopher J., Claudia G. Flato, Suman Ambwani, Beth H. Garland, and Leslie C. Morey. "A comparison of Latino and Anglo socially desirable responding." Journal of Clinical Psychology 65, no. 7 (July 2009): 769–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20584.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Huang, Chiungjung. "Relation between self-esteem and socially desirable responding and the role of socially desirable responding in the relation between self-esteem and performance." European Journal of Psychology of Education 28, no. 3 (June 26, 2012): 663–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10212-012-0134-5.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Gignac, Gilles E. "Modeling the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding: Evidence in Favor of a Revised Model of Socially Desirable Responding." Journal of Personality Assessment 95, no. 6 (November 2013): 645–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.816717.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Protzko, John, Claire M. Zedelius, and Jonathan W. Schooler. "Rushing to Appear Virtuous: Time Pressure Increases Socially Desirable Responding." Psychological Science 30, no. 11 (October 11, 2019): 1584–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797619867939.

Full text

Abstract:

Prosociality increases when decisions are made under time pressure. Here, we investigated whether time pressure increases socially desirable responding outside social interactions (Study 1). Finding that it did, we then examined whether this is because people align their responses with the concept of their “true” self or because of an intuitive tendency to comply with norms (Study 2). In Study 1, we randomly assigned each of 1,500 Americans to answer a measure of social-desirability bias either quickly or slowly and found that quick responding increased social desirability. In Study 2, we recruited a similar sample and tested whether fast-responding effects were moderated by the extent to which people display a good-true-self bias. A greater tendency to ascribe good behaviors to the true self predicted social desirability, but this relationship disappeared under time pressure. These results of socially desirable behavior under time pressure do not reflect people’s deep-down good selves but, rather, their desire to present themselves favorably to other people.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

CHIU, Chi-yue, Zhi-Min ZOU, and Sheng-Dong LIN. "Culture and Socially Desirable Responding: An Individual-in-Society Perspective." Acta Psychologica Sinica 42, no. 1 (February 3, 2010): 48–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1041.2010.00048.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Plouffe, R., and S. V. Paunonen. "Personality Traits Underlying Socially Desirable Responding in Men Versus Women." Personality and Individual Differences 101 (October 2016): 505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.05.256.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Ambwani, Suman, Abbe G. Boeka, Joshua D. Brown, T. Karl Byrne, Amanda R. Budak, David B. Sarwer, Anthony N. Fabricatore, Leslie C. Morey, and Patrick M. O'Neil. "Socially desirable responding by bariatric surgery candidates during psychological assessment." Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases 9, no. 2 (March 2013): 300–305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2011.06.019.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Lindeman, Marjaana, and Markku Verkasalo. "Personality, situation, and positive–negative asymmetry in socially desirable responding." European Journal of Personality 9, no. 2 (June 1995): 125–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.2410090206.

Full text

Abstract:

Based on previous research on socially desirable responding and positive—negative asymmetry, we hypothesized that (i) impression management is higher in public than in private settings, (ii) personal ideals linked to exemplification, ingratiation, and intimidation are related to an impression management tendency, (iii) negatively keyed social desirability items receive more extreme responses than positively keyed items, and (iv) self‐esteem is correlated higher with negatively than with positively keyed self‐deception items. Based on Jones and Pittman's (1982) model, exemplification, ingratiation, and intimidation are defined as impression management strategies that aim at presenting oneself as worthy, likable, or dangerous, respectively. Principally, the results obtained in a public setting (N=177) and a private setting (N= 165) support these hypotheses. The overall pattern of findings suggests that both context and personal ideals exert an influence on impression management scores, and that the keying direction of an item may be an important psychological determinant of a test response.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Li, Feng, Yongjuan Li, and Yong Wang. "Socially Desirable Responding in Chinese University Students: Denial and Enhancement?" Psychological Reports 116, no. 2 (April 2015): 409–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/03.07.pr0.116k18w8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Risko, Evan F., Lena C. Quilty, and Jonathan M. Oakman. "Socially Desirable Responding on the Web: Investigating the Candor Hypothesis." Journal of Personality Assessment 87, no. 3 (October 2006): 269–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8703_08.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Lynn, Christopher Dana, Jason Joseph Paris, Cheryl Anne Frye, and Lawrence M. Schell. "Religious-Commitment Signaling and Impression Management amongst Pentecostals: Relationships to Salivary Cortisol and Alpha-Amylase." Journal of Cognition and Culture 15, no. 3-4 (August 26, 2015): 299–319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12342152.

Full text

Abstract:

Religious-commitment signaling is thought to indicate willingness to cooperate with a religious group. It follows that a desire to signal affiliation and reap concomitant benefits would lend itself to acting in socially desirable ways. Success or failure in such areas, especially where there is conscious intent, should correspond to proximal indicators of well-being, such as psychosocial or biological stress. To test this model, we assessed religious-commitment signaling and socially desirable responding among a sample of Pentecostals with respect to salivary biomarkers of stress and arousal. Results indicate that cortisol levels on worship and non-worship days were significantly influenced by religious-commitment signaling when moderated by impression management, a conscious form of socially desirable responding. No significant influences on salivary alpha-amylase were detected. These findings are important for understanding how religious-commitment signaling mechanisms may influence stress response when moderated by socially desirable responding and the role of communal orientation to psychosocial health.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Lajunen and Gaygısız. "Can We Rely on Self-Assessments of Sense of Coherence? The Effects of Socially Desirable Responding on the Orientation to Life Questionnaire (OLQ) Responses." Social Sciences 8, no. 10 (October 1, 2019): 278. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/socsci8100278.

Full text

Abstract:

A large number of studies in health psychology have shown that sense of coherence (SOC) is an essential factor in wellbeing and health. SOC is most commonly measured with the Antonovsky’s Orientation to Life Questionnaire (OLQ), which has been so far translated into at least 48 languages. Despite the vast popularity of the OLQ, the relationships between OLQ and socially desirable responding (impression management and self-deception) have not been studied. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the correlations between social desirability and Antonovsky’s OLQ. Method: The first sample consisted of 423 students who completed the 13-item OLQ and the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ), including the Lie scale. Also, the Balanced Inventory for Desirable Responding by Paulhus was administered together with the OLQ to 202 students. Results: SOC correlated positively with measures of social desirability among men but not among women. Hence, sex moderated the relationship between socially desirable responding and sense of coherence. Conclusions: Socially desirable responding and, especially, self-deception are positively related to high scores in SOC among men but not among women. The OLQ as a measure of sense of coherence can be used among women without worrying about the bias caused by socially desirable responding. When using the OLQ among men, the strong relationship between self-deception and sense of coherence should be taken into account.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Leak, Gary K., and Chad J. Parsons. "THE SUSCEPTIBILITY OF THREE ATTACHMENT STYLE MEASURES TO SOCIALLY DESIRABLE RESPONDING." Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal 29, no. 1 (January 1, 2001): 21–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2001.29.1.21.

Full text

Abstract:

This study investigated the susceptibility of three popular measures of attachment styles to impression management (other-deception) and unconscious defensiveness (self-deception). Specifically, responses to the Attachment Style Questionnaire, Adult Attachment Scale, and the Relationship Questionnaire were correlated with the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding. Results indicate that all three measures are, to varying degrees, contaminated by impression management tendencies, while only the Relationship Questionnaire is free from a self-deceptive bias. These results have implications for interpreting responses to several frequently used measures of attachment styles, also for the theoretical issue of whether the avoidance attachment style is based on defensiveness.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Tonković Grabovac, Maša. "Historical Overview of Conceptualizations of Socially Desirable Responding in Personality Questionnaires." Drustvena istrazivanja 22, no. 3 (September 1, 2013): 413–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.5559/di.22.3.02.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Kurtz, John E., Sarah J. Tarquini, and Emily A. Iobst. "Socially desirable responding in personality assessment: Still more substance than style." Personality and Individual Differences 45, no. 1 (July 2008): 22–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.02.012.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Saar, Kalev, Toivo Aavik, and Kenn Konstabel. "Using principal component scores reduces the effect of socially desirable responding." Personality and Individual Differences 53, no. 3 (August 2012): 279–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.03.030.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Lalwani, Ashok K., Sharon Shavitt, and Timothy Johnson. "What is the relation between cultural orientation and socially desirable responding?" Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90, no. 1 (2006): 165–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.165.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Holtgraves, Thomas. "Social Desirability and Self-Reports: Testing Models of Socially Desirable Responding." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30, no. 2 (February 2004): 161–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167203259930.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Abrams, Lyndon, and Jerry Trusty. "African Americans' Racial Identity and Socially Desirable Responding: An Empirical Model." Journal of Counseling & Development 82, no. 3 (July 2004): 365–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2004.tb00322.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Manning, Kenneth C., William O. Bearden, and Kelly Tian. "Development and validation of the Agents’ Socially Desirable Responding (ASDR) scale." Marketing Letters 20, no. 1 (July 24, 2008): 31–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11002-008-9041-6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Dutton, Donald G., and Kenneth J. Hemphill. "Patterns of Socially Desirable Responding Among Perpetrators and Victims of Wife Assault." Violence and Victims 7, no. 1 (March 1, 1992): 29–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.7.1.29.

Full text

Abstract:

Wife assaulters attending a treatment group and women who had just exited an abusive relationship were asked to report on the extent of physical violence and emotional abuse in their relationship. Measures of socially desirable responding (SDR) were administered to both groups. Wife assaulters' self-reports of physical abuse correlated negatively with one SDR measure (the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding) but not another (the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale); emotional abuse correlated negatively with both measures. Although physical abuse was primarily related to impression management, psychological abuse was affected by both impression management and self-deception aspects of SDR. Wife assaulters' reports of their own anger also correlated negatively with SDR. Both self-deception and impression management appear to contribute to underreporting of anger. Finally, abuse victims' reports of both physical and emotional abuse were unrelated to SDR.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Burris, Christopher T., and Geoffrey S. Navara. "Morality Play or Playing Morality?: Intrinsic Religious Orientation and Socially Desirable Responding." Self and Identity 1, no. 1 (January 2002): 67–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/152988602317232812.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Loving, Timothy J., and Christopher R. Agnew. "Socially Desirable Responding in Close Relationships: A Dual-Component Approach and Measure." Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 18, no. 4 (August 2001): 551–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407501184007.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Davies, Martin F. "Socially Desirable Responding and Impression Management in the Endorsement of Love Styles." Journal of Psychology 135, no. 5 (September 2001): 562–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223980109603719.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Doran, Rouven, and Daniel Hanss. "Socially desirable responding: the case of self-reported values in tourism surveys." Current Issues in Tourism 22, no. 2 (April 5, 2017): 127–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2017.1310191.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Barry, Christopher T., Joyce H. L. Lui, and Alexandra C. Anderson. "Adolescent Narcissism, Aggression, and Prosocial Behavior: The Relevance of Socially Desirable Responding." Journal of Personality Assessment 99, no. 1 (June 30, 2016): 46–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2016.1193812.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Dudley, Nicole M., Lynn A. McFarland, Scott A. Goodman, Steven T. Hunt, and Eric J. Sydell. "Racial Differences in Socially Desirable Responding in Selection Contexts: Magnitude and Consequences." Journal of Personality Assessment 85, no. 1 (August 2005): 50–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8501_05.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Marshall, Margarita B., Filip De Fruyt, Jean-Pierre Rolland, and R. Michael Bagby. "Socially desirable responding and the factorial stability of the NEO PI-R." Psychological Assessment 17, no. 3 (September 2005): 379–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.3.379.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Börger, Tobias. "Keeping up appearances: Motivations for socially desirable responding in contingent valuation interviews." Ecological Economics 87 (March 2013): 155–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.019.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Lönnqvist, J. "Increased socially desirable responding in college applicants reapplying and retesting after initial failure." Personality and Individual Differences 60 (April 2014): S5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.07.157.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Holden, Ronald R., and Jennifer Passey. "Socially desirable responding in personality assessment: Not necessarily faking and not necessarily substance." Personality and Individual Differences 49, no. 5 (October 2010): 446–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.04.015.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!