Academic literature on the topic 'Social evaluations'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Social evaluations.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Social evaluations"
Barnett, Michael L., Michael Andreas Etter, Timothy Hannigan, Rhonda K. Reger, and Anastasiya A. Zavyalova. "Social Media and Social Evaluations." Academy of Management Proceedings 2019, no. 1 (August 1, 2019): 13845. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2019.13845symposium.
Full textSvensson, Kate, Barbara Szijarto, Peter Milley, and J. Bradley Cousins. "Evaluating Social Innovations." American Journal of Evaluation 39, no. 4 (April 29, 2018): 459–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098214018763553.
Full textNørholm, Morten. "Outlining a theory of the social and symbolic function of evaluations of education." Praxeologi – Et kritisk refleksivt blikk på sosiale praktikker 1 (May 21, 2019): e1467. http://dx.doi.org/10.15845/praxeologi.v1i0.1467.
Full textBufquin, Diego, Robin DiPietro, Marissa Orlowski, and Charles Partlow. "Social evaluations of restaurant managers." International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 30, no. 3 (March 19, 2018): 1827–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-11-2016-0617.
Full textZandniapour, Lily, and Nicole M. Deterding. "Lessons From the Social Innovation Fund." American Journal of Evaluation 39, no. 1 (October 30, 2017): 27–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098214017734305.
Full textHinsz, Verlin B., and David C. Matz. "SELF-EVALUATIONS INVOLVED IN GOAL SETTING AND TASK PERFORMANCE." Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal 25, no. 2 (January 1, 1997): 177–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1997.25.2.177.
Full textGeorghiou, L. "Meta-evaluation: Evaluation of evaluations." Scientometrics 45, no. 3 (July 1999): 523–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02457622.
Full textPraestgaard, E. "Meta-evaluation: Evaluation of evaluations." Scientometrics 45, no. 3 (July 1999): 531–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02457623.
Full textElliott, Megan, Mark Davies, Julie Davies, and Carolyn Wallace. "Exploring how and why social prescribing evaluations work: a realist review." BMJ Open 12, no. 4 (April 2022): e057009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057009.
Full textSkarżyńska, Krystyna. "SPRAWIEDLIWOŚĆ JAKO KRYTERIUM OCENY SYSTEMU EKONOMICZNO-POLITYCZNEGO." Civitas et Lex 5, no. 1 (March 31, 2015): 19–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.31648/cetl.2032.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Social evaluations"
Dufurrena, Seamus. "Three essays on accounting, professions, and social evaluations." Electronic Thesis or Diss., Cergy-Pontoise, Ecole supérieure des sciences économiques et commerciales, 2022. http://www.theses.fr/2022ESEC0005.
Full textThough the accounting literature makes ample reference to social evaluation constructs overall, it has remained principally focused on examining the production (e.g. Andon et al., 2014; Çakmaklı et al., 2020; Courtois & Gendron, 2020; Kirkham & Loft, 1993; Michelon et al., 2019; O'Dwyer et al., 2011; Power, 2003b; Robson et al., 2007) and maintenance (e.g. Carnegie & O'Connell, 2012; Dermarkar & Hazgui, 2022; Durocher et al., 2016; Harrington, 2019; Mitchell et al., 1994; Robson et al., 1994; Whittle et al., 2014a) of legitimacy. While important, focusing on the profession's legitimacy only partially fulfills a comprehensive understanding of how accountancy can be defined and perceived as a profession that enjoys the privileges that it does relative to other occupations. Further, where accountancy studies do allude to other social evaluations, such as reputation and status, they are often treated as ancillary features of legitimacy, mentioned in passing, and often remain undefined or under-developed. Similarly, and perhaps because professions are most often associated with positive social evaluations (i.e. legitimacy, status, and reputation), stigma has tended to be neglected in the accountancy literature. This dissertation seeks to address these issues by first synthesizing the literature through a systematic review as well as by further developing knowledge relating to the constructs of stigma and status through two empirical essays. For instance, and with regards to stigma, our understanding of how professional accountants contend with stigma seems confined to stigmatized individuals in the workplace (Stenger & Roulet, 2018) and institutional responses to corporate scandals (Neu & Wright, 1992). This dissertation examines a context in which accounting professionals provide services to firms suffering from core-stigma (Hudson, 2008; Hudson & Okhuysen, 2009), thus shedding light on how the profession contends with the risks of stigma on a more persistent basis. Similarly, while there is a growing body of work that illustrates how elite status is attained and perpetuated among members of the profession, particularly in large professional services firms, attention has primarily been paid to socialization processes that unfold within these organizations, after members have already been inducted (e.g. Anderson-Gough et al., 2000a; Carter & Spence, 2014a). This dissertation focuses instead on the socialization processes that unfold earlier in life (i.e. in the home and in schooling) in order to further explicate the means by which individuals make their way into elite professional organizations and, indeed, integrate into high status social circles. Overall, this dissertation makes theoretical contributions by treating legitimacy, status, reputation and stigma as stand-alone constructs and providing scholarship a basis for better understanding how accountancy manages to uphold professionalism in the eyes of critical social audiences. By viewing professionalism, that is features that distinguish professions from other occupations, through these social evaluation constructs, this dissertation furthers our understanding of how accountancy is able “to convince audiences” of its expertise, its justification for autonomy, its authority over others, and its presumed altruism (Anteby et al., 2016)
Pun, Anthea Colleen. "Foundations of infants' social group evaluations." Thesis, University of British Columbia, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/2429/54493.
Full textArts, Faculty of
Psychology, Department of
Graduate
Petersén, Anna. "Evaluations that matter in social work." Doctoral thesis, Örebro universitet, Institutionen för juridik, psykologi och socialt arbete, 2017. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-56146.
Full textBergstrand, Kelly. "Mobilizing for the cause| Grievance evaluations in social movements." Thesis, The University of Arizona, 2015. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=3702713.
Full textThe role of grievances in drawing public concern and activist support is a surprisingly understudied topic in modern social movement literature. This research is the first to parse grievances into core components to understand whether some grievances are more successful than others in evoking mobilizing, affective and cognitive reactions that can ultimately benefit social movements. I find that not all grievances are created equal when it comes to concern, support and interest in activism, and that the content of grievances can be studied in systematic ways to identify the types of grievances likely to be more powerful injustice events.
This dissertation bridges social psychology and social movements by applying concepts from Affect Control Theory (such as evaluation ratings and deflection) to grievance evaluations. To understand the differential effects of grievances, I break grievances into three basic building blocks—a Perpetrator (Actor), the act itself (Behavior), and the victim (Object). I then use measures of cultural perceptions of the goodness or badness of behaviors and identities to investigate how people react to different configurations of good or bad perpetrators, behavior and victims in injustice events. I posit that two mechanisms—concern about the wellbeing of others and desire for consistency in meanings about the world—drive reactions to the goodness or badness of elements in a grievance. I test hypotheses using an experimental design, specifically a vignette study.
I find strong support, across outcomes, that bad behavior, particularly when directed toward good victims, constitutes a form of grievance that promotes strong mobilizing, affective and cognitive reactions. I also find that the perpetrator matters for many outcomes, but that the effect of perpetrator is weaker than the effect of behavior and its target, tends to be insignificant for measures specific to behavioral activism, and largely disappears in cases of bad behavior toward good victims. In general, bad perpetrators produce higher levels of concern and emotion than do good perpetrators. The results also show that while concerns about the wellbeing of others dominate grievance evaluations, expectations about how the world should be (and deflection from those expectations) are useful for understanding reactions to perpetrators and to injustice events involving good behavior.
The conclusions from this dissertation contribute to a number of social movement arenas, including participation, movement outcomes, framing and emotions. Further, it has the real world implications of suggesting how well particular social issues might fare in attracting public concern and activist attention. This provides insights into both the types of movements more likely to be successful as well as the types of social problems less likely to draw public attention, increasing the chances that such problems persist.
Bhadhuri, Arjun. "Including health spillovers in economic evaluations." Thesis, University of Birmingham, 2018. http://etheses.bham.ac.uk//id/eprint/8080/.
Full textGabalda, Belonia. "Development of the sense of ownership : social and moral evaluations." Thesis, Paris 5, 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012PA05T035/document.
Full textSince a very young age, the majority of human social interactions involve objects. In these interactions, children seem to take into account who owns what. The notion of ownership thus does not involve only a person and an object, but is a relationship between several persons with respect to an object. This relationship is organized by a set of rules or property rights. Our work deals with children’s understanding of the notion of ownership. At what age do children acquire the understanding of property rights? Before an explicit mastery of the notion of ownership, do children have a more implicit understanding of it? More precisely, we explored the understanding and evaluation of illegitimate and legitimate transfers of property in children from 5 months to 5 years of age. We studied two types of ownership transgressions: illegitimate acquisition of an object (without owner’s intention to transfer it), and absence of restitution of an object to its owner. In all our studies, we presented to children property transfers between two characters using non-verbal animated cartoons or movies with puppets as actors, and then measured children’s understanding and evaluation of those transfers. The studies in Chapter 2 (Studies 1 and 2) assessed children’s evaluation of different modes of acquisition of an object. The two experiments of Study 1 explored 3- and 5-year-olds’s understanding and evaluation of illegitimate and legitimate property transfers. Adults were also tested as a control population. This study is the first one to investigate simultaneously children’s explicit and implicit understanding of the notion of ownership, by asking questions about property rights, as well as social and moral evaluations of the characters implicated in the transfers, respectively. In Study 1a, participants saw a character acquiring an object either in an illegitimate way (theft condition) or in a legitimate one (gift-reception condition). In Study 1b, an illegitimate action (theft) was compared to a legitimate action (giving). 5-year-old children (as adults) showed both an implicit understanding of ownership through their social/moral evaluation (preferring the legitimate agent (gift recipient or giver) compared to the illegitimate agent (thief)), and an explicit understanding of ownership through their ability to attribute different property rights considering the legitimacy of the transfer. 3-year-old children did not make any distinction between the illegitimate and legitimate conditions in their evaluation, neither in their attribution of property rights. These results suggest that children acquire implicit and explicit understanding of ownership at the same time. In Study 1, no emotional reaction was present. We examined in Study 2 the role of the first possessor’s emotions in 3-year-olds’ evaluation of object acquisition. The same cue was present in the legitimate and illegitimate conditions: the first possessor being sad after both transfers. In the presence of this emotional cue, 3-year-olds managed to distinguish between the two conditions in their social/moral evaluation. This distinction could not have been based solely on the presence of a negative emotion, as the emotion displayed was the same in both conditions. We suggest that 3-year-old children detected the moral transgression in the theft condition, and used the negative emotion to confirm it. The studies in Chapter 3 (Studies 3 to 5) examined children’s evaluations of the restitution of an object to its owner. Young children (2-3-year-old) have a bias to consider that the first possessor of an object is its “owner” and that the object cannot be definitively transferred to someone else. We thus investigated whether 3-year-old children (Studies 3 and 4) implicitly evaluate the absence of restitution as a transgression, and evaluate it negatively compared to the restitution of an object to its first possessor…
Clemente, Marco. "Social Evaluations in a Multiple-Audience Context : The Impact of a Social Misconduct on People's Complaints, Share Price and Media Evaluation." Thesis, Jouy-en Josas, HEC, 2013. http://www.theses.fr/2013EHEC0012/document.
Full textLiterature on social evaluations has mainly analyzed the “audience-candidate” dyad,leaving underexplored the way the evaluation of a main audience (e.g. a social-control agent)influences the evaluation of another audience. This dissertation looks at social evaluations in amultiple-audience context. It focuses on organizational social misconduct - an important, yetunderstudied social evaluation - and it investigates “Why does an audience change its evaluationfollowing organizational social misconduct?”. Each of the three essays focuses on a differentaudience (evaluation): people (people’s complaints), investors (share price) and the media(newspapers’ evaluation). Two novel settings and unique databases were used: advertising selfregulationin the UK and Calciopoli, the scandal that affected the Italian Serie A in 2006. Resultsshow that in case of organizational social misconduct, the evaluation of a social control agent doesinfluence the evaluation of another audience, however this effect is not mechanical. Three primarymoderators emerge from the three essays: the ambiguity of the norm, the saliency of the event, andlocalness of the transgressors. In summary, this dissertation shows that social norms are betterunderstood in a triadic framework: “candidate – social-control agent – another audience”. Socialnorms are not set exogenously, but are endogenously created by the actions of the candidates andthe evaluations of (at least) two audiences
Price, Emma. "What is the role of self-evaluations in social anxiety? : can self-compassion counter negative evaluation?" Thesis, University of Southampton, 2008. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.503142.
Full textChen, Xiaoye. "Understanding the many shades of corporate social responsibility-coporate and brand evaluations." Thesis, McGill University, 2012. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=106343.
Full textLes programmes de responsabilité sociétale institutionnelle (RSE) se retrouvent de plus en plus diversifiés et sophistiques. Malgré l'usage rependu et l'évolution rapide de ces pratiques, peu de recherches marketing visent à examiner les nombreuses nuances de diverses stratégies de responsabilité sociale institutionnelle (Peloza and Shang 2010). Par conséquent, le but de cette thèse est de comprendre comment les diverses orientations stratégiques de responsabilité sociale institutionnelle peuvent donner naissance à des réponses différentes de la part du consommateur. Deux études inter-reliées ont été menées pour parvenir à ce but. L'étude 1 vise à démontrer de façon préliminaire comment les différentes formes de responsabilité sociale institutionnelle (Philanthropique, Promotionnelle et Création de Valeur) sont corrélées avec des évaluations individuelles distinctes de marques institutionnelles qui ont à la base des motivations de responsabilité sociale institutionnelle différentes.L'étude 2 démontre le processus utilisé par les consommateurs pour classifier les divers effets des différentes formes de responsabilité sociale institutionnelle rencontrées. Ensembles, nos études démontrent que lorsque la forme de responsabilité sociale institutionnelle Création de Valeur est perçue comme étant supérieure à celle Philanthropique ou Promotionnelle, les consommateurs attribuent aux institutions misant sur la première forme de responsabilité sociale: 1) une meilleure image (ex : meilleure image et crédibilité de responsabilité sociale institutionnelle); 2) de meilleurs jugements de compétences (ex : meilleure habilité institutionnelle perçue) ainsi qu'une meilleure expertise des produits et une capacité supérieure d'innover. Cette recherche illustre les conditions-limites des effets démontrés ci-dessus en identifiant le rôle modérateur des « compétences institutionnelles » et, par conséquent, contribue à clarifier davantage les processus psychologiques des consommateurs en ce qui a trait aux diverses formes de responsabilité sociale institutionnelles.
Walker, Susan. "The effect of perceived social status on preschool children's evaluations of behaviour." Thesis, Queensland University of Technology, 1996.
Find full textBooks on the topic "Social evaluations"
Theory-driven evaluations. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications, 1990.
Find full textKaren, Shapiro, ed. Designing evaluations of educational and social programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1987.
Find full textDesigning evaluations. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1991.
Find full textEuropean Social Fund. Programme Evaluation Unit. Impact of evaluations, 1997. Dublin: European Social Fund Evaluation Unit, 1997.
Find full textKatz, Steven T. The shtetl: New evaluations. New York: New York University Press, 2007.
Find full textW, Langenbucher James, Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies., and United States. President's Commission on Model State Drug Laws., eds. Socioeconomic evaluations of addictions treatment. Piscataway, NJ: Center of Alcohol Studies, Rutgers University, 1993.
Find full textKing, Elizabeth M. Timing and duration of exposure in evaluations of social programs. [Washington, D.C: World Bank, 2008.
Find full textBaily, Thelma Falk. Psychological evaluations: An aid to CPS assessment. Denver, Colo: American Humane Association, 1986.
Find full textBaily, Thelma Falk. Psychological evaluations: An aid to CPS assessment. Denver, Colo: American Humane Association, 1986.
Find full textHuey-tsyh, Chen, Rossi Peter Henry 1921-, and Policy Studies Organization, eds. Using theory to improve program and policy evaluations. New York: Greenwood Press, 1992.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Social evaluations"
Kabir, Muhammad Ashad, Jun Han, and Alan Colman. "Experimental Evaluations." In Pervasive Social Computing, 195–218. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29951-8_9.
Full textZhang, Xiaomei, and Guohong Cao. "Performance Evaluations." In Event Attendance Prediction in Social Networks, 33–45. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89262-3_6.
Full textGläSer, Jochen, and Grit Laudel. "The Social Construction Of Bibliometric Evaluations." In Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, 101–23. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6746-4_5.
Full textNonnemaker, James, Anna MacMonegle, and Matthew Farrelly. "Economic Evaluations of Social Marketing Campaigns." In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Social Marketing, 1–5. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14449-4_159-1.
Full textWorthen, Blaine R., and Karl R. White. "Uses and Functions of Onsite Evaluations." In Evaluating Educational and Social Programs, 122–29. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7420-6_5.
Full textGreenberg, Jerald. "The Distributive Justice of Organizational Performance Evaluations." In Justice in Social Relations, 337–51. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5059-0_18.
Full textCasasnovas, Jaume, and J. Vicente Riera. "Weighted Means of Subjective Evaluations." In Soft Computing in Humanities and Social Sciences, 323–45. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24672-2_18.
Full textGustafsson Sendén, Marie, and Sverker Sikström. "Social Psychology: Evaluations of Social Groups with Statistical Semantics." In Statistical Semantics, 209–18. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37250-7_12.
Full textPechmann, Cornelia, and J. Craig Andrews. "Methodological Issues and Challenges in Conducting Social Impact Evaluations." In Scaling Social Impact, 219–34. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230113565_13.
Full textRuijten, Peter A. M., and Raymond H. Cuijpers. "If Drones Could See: Investigating Evaluations of a Drone with Eyes." In Social Robotics, 65–74. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05204-1_7.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Social evaluations"
Song, Zhuoyuan. "Self-Evaluations and Social Comparison." In 2021 3rd International Conference on Economic Management and Cultural Industry (ICEMCI 2021). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211209.471.
Full textRaheja, Roshni. "Social Evaluations of Accented Englishes: An Indian Perspective." In GLOCAL Conference on Asian Linguistic Anthropology 2020. The GLOCAL Unit, SOAS University of London, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.47298/cala2020.1-1.
Full textHolm, Jon, and Anette Askedal. "Evaluation of societal impact in Norwegian SSH evaluations." In "Impact of Social Sciences and Humanities for a European Research Agenda Valuation of SSH in mission-oriented research". fteval - Platform for Research and Technology Policy Evaluation, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.22163/fteval.2019.382.
Full textHellen O. da Silva, Thiago, Lavínia Matoso Freitas, Marília Soares Mendes, and Elizabeth Sucupira Furtado. "Textual evaluation vs. User testing: a comparative analysis." In X Workshop sobre Aspectos da Interação Humano-Computador na Web Social. Sociedade Brasileira de Computação (SBC), 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.5753/waihcws.2019.7673.
Full textVocht, Frank de, Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi, Cheryl McQuire, Kate Tilling, Matthew Hickman, and Peter Craig. "P39 Evaluations of public health interventions using natural experiment evaluation designs and the ‘target trial’ framework." In Society for Social Medicine Annual Scientific Meeting Abstracts. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2021-ssmabstracts.127.
Full textZhang, Xiaoying, Hong Xie, and John C. S. Lui. "Sybil Detection in Social-Activity Networks: Modeling, Algorithms and Evaluations." In 2018 IEEE 26th International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP). IEEE, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icnp.2018.00015.
Full textMead, Ross, and Maja J. Mataric. "Proxemics and performance: Subjective human evaluations of autonomous sociable robot distance and social signal understanding." In 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iros.2015.7354229.
Full textMinetaki, Kazunori. "Twitter Discussions and evaluations about the delta variant of COVID-19 in Japan." In MISNC2021: The 8th Multidisciplinary International Social Networks Conference. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3504006.3504016.
Full textRico, Julie, and Stephen Brewster. "Gesture and voice prototyping for early evaluations of social acceptability in multimodal interfaces." In International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces and the Workshop on Machine Learning for Multimodal Interaction. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1891903.1891925.
Full textAborujilah, Abdulaziz, Rasheed Mohammad Nassr, Shahrulniza Bin Musa, and Munaisyah Abdullah. "IT Students' Sentiment of Faculty Evaluations and Posting Opinions on Social Media Networks." In IMCOM '18: The 12th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3164541.3164579.
Full textReports on the topic "Social evaluations"
Heckman, James, Jeffrey Smith, and Christopher Taber. Accounting for Dropouts in Evaluations of Social Experiments. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, September 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/t0166.
Full textCrincoli, Tim, Ella Beveridge, and Howard White. Development project evaluations in Malawi: A Country Evaluation Map. Centre for Excellence and Development Impact and Learning (CEDIL), November 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.51744/cswp6.
Full textMoffitt, Robert. The Role of Randomized Field Trials in Social Science Research: A Perspective from Evaluations of Reforms of Social Welfare Programs. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, October 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/t0295.
Full textTripathi, Stuti, Kanika Jha Kingra, Francis Rathinam, Tony Tyrrell, and Marie Gaarder. Social protection: a synthesis of evidence and lessons from 3ie- supported impact evaluations. International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie), June 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.23846/wp0034.
Full textRathinam, Francis, P. Thissen, and M. Gaarder. Using big data for impact evaluations. Centre of Excellence for Development Impact and Learning (CEDIL), February 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.51744/cmb2.
Full textSon, Jihyeong, NIgel AR Joseph, and Vicki McCracken. Instagram Captions Matter. How Regulatory Fit Relates to Consumer Interactions and Brand Evaluations on Social Media. Ames (Iowa): Iowa State University. Library, January 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/itaa.10233.
Full textMacura, Biljana, Sarah Dickin, Hugh Sharma Waddington, Carla Liera, Adriana Soto, Arianna Orlando, Ella Foggit, et al. Gender and social outcomes of WASH interventions: synthesis of research evidence. Centre for Excellence and Development Impact and Learning (CEDIL), March 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.51744/cswp7.
Full textBarakat, Sarah, Alexia Pretari, and Jaynie Vonk. Centring Gender and Power in Evaluation and Research: Sharing experiences from Oxfam GB's quantitative impact evaluations. Oxfam GB, July 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.21201/2021/7789.
Full textStrachan, Anna. Lessons Learned from Humanitarian Interventions in Ukraine (2014-2021). Institute of Development Studies, December 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/k4d.2022.046.
Full textBassi, Andrea. From “Social Impact” to “Social Value”. Liège: CIRIEC, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.25518/ciriec.wp202206.
Full text