Academic literature on the topic 'Shared cognition'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Shared cognition.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Shared cognition"
Cannon-Bowers, Janis A., and Eduardo Salas. "Reflections on shared cognition." Journal of Organizational Behavior 22, no. 2 (2001): 195–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.82.
Full textTomasello, Michael, Malinda Carpenter, Josep Call, Tanya Behne, and Henrike Moll. "Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition." Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28, no. 5 (October 2005): 675–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x05000129.
Full textMcNeese, Michael D., Elena Theodorou, Lori Ferzandi, Tyrone Jefferson, and Xun Ge. "Distributed Cognition in Shared Information Spaces." Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 46, no. 3 (September 2002): 556–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154193120204600371.
Full textMaltseva, Kateryna. "Bridging sociology with anthropology and cognitive science perspectives to assess shared cultural knowledge." Sociology: Theory, Methods, Marketing, stmm 2020 (1) (March 16, 2020): 108–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.15407/sociology2020.01.108.
Full textCradock, Robert M., Lauren B. Resnick, John M. Levine, and Stephanie D. Teasley. "Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition." Contemporary Sociology 21, no. 5 (September 1992): 716. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2075588.
Full textRothrock, Jane C. "Shared Cognition: Reflecting, Considering, Deliberating." AORN Journal 92, no. 3 (September 2010): 253–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2010.06.009.
Full textChen, Ming-Huei, Yu-Yu Chang, and Yuan-Chieh Chang. "The trinity of entrepreneurial team dynamics: cognition, conflicts and cohesion." International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research 23, no. 6 (October 2, 2017): 934–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijebr-07-2016-0213.
Full textWang, Shirley, Stephen J. Sauer, and Tom Schryver. "The Benefits of Early Diverse and Late Shared Task Cognition." Small Group Research 50, no. 3 (May 13, 2019): 408–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496419835917.
Full textSiegal, Michael. "Cognitive social psychology and historical perspectives on socially shared cognition." Contemporary Psychology: A Journal of Reviews 38, no. 9 (September 1993): 1004–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/033769.
Full textHarris, Celia B., Amanda J. Barnier, John Sutton, and Paul G. Keil. "Couples as socially distributed cognitive systems: Remembering in everyday social and material contexts." Memory Studies 7, no. 3 (June 17, 2014): 285–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1750698014530619.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Shared cognition"
Berggren, Peter. "Assessing Shared Strategic Understanding." Doctoral thesis, Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för datavetenskap, 2016. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-126346.
Full textDenna avhandling beskriver utvecklingen av ett mätinstrument för att värdera delad förståelse hos team. Syftet har varit att utveckla ett mätinstrument som är användbart, förståeligt, objektivt, flexibelt och självförklarande. Team som arbetar i naturalistiska miljöer förväntas ha en delad förståelse för gemensamma mål och hur dessa ska uppnås. Befintliga tekniker och mätinstrument för värdering av delad förståelse hos team är att de ofta lider av ett eller flera av följande problem: de är dyra, svåra att använda, tidskrävande, kräver expertis, och bygger många gånger på subjektiva bedömningar. Genom att utgå från teoribildningen inom teamkognition ställs följande forskningsfrågor: 1) Hur kan delad förståelse i team mätas utan nackdelarna hos befintliga metoder? 2) Hur kan delad förståelse i team mätas utan att riskera att färgas av partiskheten hos egenbedömningar och/eller experters värderingar? 3) Kan teamprestation förstås bättre med hjälp av ett instrument som mäter delad förståelse? Dessa frågeställningar besvaras i de sex delstudier som presenteras i denna avhandling där ett instrument (som kallas shared priorities) utvecklats för att mäta delad förståelse. Tillämpningen innebär att medlemmarna i ett team individuellt får generera och rangordna faktorer som de anser vara viktiga för att teamet ska nå sitt/sina gemensamma mål och därefter rangordna varandras faktorer. Genom att beräkna överensstämmelsen i dessa rangordningar erhålls ett mått på teamets delade förståelse. Fördelen med detta instrument, i jämförelse med tidigare mått, är att det kostar mindre, är lättare att använda, tar mindre tid, inte kräver någon domänexpertis, och att mätmetoden inte bygger på rent subjektiva bedömningar. I den sista delstudien erhålls resultat där instrumentet shared priorities korrelerar med prestation, vilket stöder tidigare forskning om delad förståelse. En statistisk modell (SEM) visar på instrumentets validitet och reliabilitet.
Lippa, Katherine Domjan. "Cognition of Shared Decision Making: The Case of Multiple Sclerosis." Wright State University / OhioLINK, 2016. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wright1463576554.
Full textKlotz, Shannon Marie. "Cooperative Success Under Shared Cognitive States and Valuations." Scholarship @ Claremont, 2019. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/scripps_theses/1344.
Full textBanissy, M. J. "Mirror-touch synaesthesia : the role of shared representations in social cognition." Thesis, University College London (University of London), 2010. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/19307/.
Full textHildreth, Paul M. "Going the extra half-mile : international communities of practice and the role of shared artefacts." Thesis, University of York, 2000. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.341485.
Full textAlfadhli, Khalifah H. "The role of shared identity in social support among refugees of conflict : case of Syrian refugees in Middle East." Thesis, University of Sussex, 2018. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/78468/.
Full textAlavi, Seyyed Babak Education Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences UNSW. "A multilevel study of collective efficacy, self-mental models, and collective cognition in university student group activities." Awarded by:University of New South Wales. Education, 2005. http://handle.unsw.edu.au/1959.4/33242.
Full textO'Mara, Raymond P. (Raymond Patrick). "The socio-technical construction of precision bombing : a study of shared control and cognition by humans, machines, and doctrine during World War II." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/67754.
Full textCataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 353-368).
This dissertation examines the creation and initial use of the precision bombing system employed by the United States Army Air Forces during World War II in the opening phase of the Combined Bomber Offensive against Germany. It presents the system as distinctly sociotechnical, constructed of interdependent specially trained humans-the pilot, navigator, and bombardier-purpose-built automated machines-the Norden bombsight and the Minneapolis- Honeywell C-1 Autopilot-and the high-altitude, daylight bombing (HADPB) doctrine, all of which mutually shaped each other's creation and use. The first part of the study establishes the relationship between the HADPB doctrine, the humans, and the machines, presenting the bombardment system as a three-level socio-technical system designed for optimum control at all levels. It describes the elements at each level, their design for use as a system, how they initially employed the system, and how their actions caused a revision of the HADPB doctrine, in the process redefining precision from a system perspective and significantly changing the system's social structure. The second part of the study examines the actions performed by the three principal sociotechnical members the bomber crew, and determines the specific tasks and roles accomplished both the humans and machines within the system. It establishes what the crewmembers did, analyzing their professional construct, the machines that shaped their professional identities, how the humans and machines, through distinct processes of shared control and cognition, accomplished the tasks associated with precision bombing-flying, navigating, and bombingand how the HADPB doctrine affected their actions. It focuses on how technology, by granting varying levels of control over the task of flying the aircraft, created conflict over control of the system itself, and how command, a uniquely military function granted organizationally and doctrinally to the pilot, served as arbiter of that conflict. This study establishes a perspective for the future study aerial combat systems, and a better understanding of the organizational and social impact of the increased use of automation in those systems, particularly relevant to the discussion surrounding the expanded use of remotely piloted aircraft by the United States Air Force in the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.
by Raymond P. O'Mara.
Ph.D.
Soley, Gaye. "Exploring the nature of early social preferences: The case of music." Thesis, Harvard University, 2012. http://dissertations.umi.com/gsas.harvard:10390.
Full textPsychology
Jimenez, Rodriguez Miliani. "Two Pathways To Performance: Affective- and Motivationally-Driven Development In Virtual Multiteam Systems." Doctoral diss., University of Central Florida, 2012. http://digital.library.ucf.edu/cdm/ref/collection/ETD/id/5322.
Full textID: 031001482; System requirements: World Wide Web browser and PDF reader.; Mode of access: World Wide Web.; Adviser: Leslie A. DeChurch.; Title from PDF title page (viewed July 17, 2013).; Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Central Florida, 2012.; Includes bibliographical references (p. 289-305).
Ph.D.
Doctorate
Psychology
Sciences
Psychology; Industrial and Organizational
Books on the topic "Shared cognition"
Resnick, Lauren B., John M. Levine, and Stephanie D. Teasley, eds. Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington: American Psychological Association, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10096-000.
Full textSillince, John A. A. Shared cognition as internalisation of organizational context. Sheffield: Sheffield University, School of Management, 1995.
Find full textNye, Judith, and Aaron Brower. What's Social about Social Cognition? Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States: SAGE Publications, Inc., 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483327648.
Full text1973-, Hacker David, ed. Problematic and risk behaviours in psychosis: A shared formulation approach. Hove, East Sussex: Routledge, 2010.
Find full textRizzolatti, Giacomo. Mirrors in the brain: How our minds share actions and emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Find full textRizzolatti, Giacomo. Mirrors in the brain: How our minds share actions and emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Find full textBattista, Michael T. Cognition-based assessment and teaching of geometric shapes: Building on students' reasoning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 2012.
Find full textVertinsky, Ilan. Shades of green: Cognitive framing and the dynamics of corporate environmental response. Edmonton, Alta: Sustainable Forest Management Network, 1998.
Find full textauthor, Gowlett John, and Dunbar, R. I. M. (Robin Ian MacDonald), 1947- author, eds. Thinking big: How the evolution of social life shaped the human mind. London: Thames & Hudson, 2014.
Find full textLevine, John M., Leigh L. Thompson, and David M. Messick, eds. Shared Cognition in Organizations. Psychology Press, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203763803.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Shared cognition"
Razzouk, Rim, and Tristan Johnson. "Shared Cognition." In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, 3056–58. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_205.
Full textClarke, David, and Man Ching Esther Chan. "Dialogue and shared cognition." In The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Dialogic Education, 581–92. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge, 2020.: Routledge, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429441677-47.
Full textFrank, Jerome D. "Therapeutic Components Shared by All Psychotherapies." In Cognition and Psychotherapy, 49–79. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7562-3_2.
Full textTindale, R. Scott, Helen M. Meisenhelder, Amanda A. Dykema-Engblade, and Michael A. Hogg. "Shared Cognition in Small Groups." In Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes, 1–30. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470998458.ch1.
Full textSottilare, Robert A. "Modeling Shared States for Adaptive Instruction." In Foundations of Augmented Cognition, 690–96. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20816-9_66.
Full textStovall, Preston. "Normative Attitudes, Shared Intentionality, and Discursive Cognition." In The Social Institution of Discursive Norms, 138–76. New York, NY : Routledge, an imprint of Taylor & Francis Group, 2021. |: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003047483-9.
Full textRenner, Patrick, Thies Pfeiffer, and Ipke Wachsmuth. "Spatial References with Gaze and Pointing in Shared Space of Humans and Robots." In Spatial Cognition IX, 121–36. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11215-2_9.
Full textRoss, Robert J., Hui Shi, Tillman Vierhuff, Bernd Krieg-Brückner, and John Bateman. "Towards Dialogue Based Shared Control of Navigating Robots." In Spatial Cognition IV. Reasoning, Action, Interaction, 478–99. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32255-9_26.
Full textYamaguchi, Masataka. "Discovering Shared Understandings in Discourse: Prototypes and Stereotypes." In Approaches to Language, Culture, and Cognition, 217–33. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137274823_9.
Full textSchneider, Stefan, and Andreas Nürnberger. "Evaluating Semantic Co-creation by Using a Marker as a Linguistic Constraint Tool in Shared Cognitive Representation Models." In Language, Cognition, and Mind, 121–52. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69823-2_6.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Shared cognition"
Wang, Mingwei, Xiaoying Chen, Jingtao Zhou, Tengyuan Jiang, and Wenhao Cai. "Shared Cognition Based Integration Dynamic Scheduling Method." In 2018 2nd IEEE Advanced Information Management, Communicates, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IMCEC). IEEE, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/imcec.2018.8469377.
Full textKleinsmann, Maaike, and Andy Dong. "Investigating the Affective Force on Creating Shared Understanding." In ASME 2007 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. ASMEDC, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc2007-34240.
Full textValentini, Manuela, and Simone Guarnacci. "Embodied cognition, effective learning and physical activity as a shared feature: Systematic review." In Journal of Human Sport and Exercise - 2021 - Autumn Conferences of Sports Science. Universidad de Alicante, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2021.16.proc2.38.
Full textCohen, Marvin S., Onur Sert, Melanie LeGoullon, Ewart de Visser, Amos Freedy, Gershon Weltman, and Mary Cummings. "Cognition and game theory in the design of a collaboration manager for shared control of multiple UV assets." In 2008 International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems (CTS). IEEE, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/cts.2008.4543972.
Full textCrain, Patrick A., and Brian P. Bailey. "Share Once or Share Often?" In C&C '17: Creativity and Cognition. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3059454.3059476.
Full textHenselman-Petrusek, Gregorty, Simon Segert, Bryn Keller, Mariano Tepper, and Jon Cohen. "Geometry of Shared Representations." In 2019 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience. Brentwood, Tennessee, USA: Cognitive Computational Neuroscience, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.32470/ccn.2019.1418-0.
Full textOhuchi, Hirotomo, Satoshi Yamada, and Setsuko Ouchi. "Visible Space by Landscape Recognition of Local Inhabitant and Its Composition in Japan." In ASME 2010 29th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. ASMEDC, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/omae2010-20871.
Full textBenjamin, Ari, Cheng Qiu, Ling-Qi Zhang, Konrad Kording, and Alan Stocker. "Shared visual illusions between humans and artificial neural networks." In 2019 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience. Brentwood, Tennessee, USA: Cognitive Computational Neuroscience, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.32470/ccn.2019.1299-0.
Full textTapolcai, Janos, Zalan Heszberger, Gabor Retvari, and Jozsef Biro. "Reduced information scenario for Shared Segment Protection." In 2013 IEEE 4th International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom). IEEE, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/coginfocom.2013.6719171.
Full textPerez Robles, Eva, Karl-Josef Friederichs, Andreas Lobinger, Simone Redana, Ingo Viering, and Juan Naranjo. "Optimization of Authorised/Licensed Shared Access resources." In 9th International Conference on Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks. ICST, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/icst.crowncom.2014.255681.
Full textReports on the topic "Shared cognition"
Cooke, Nancy J., Steven M. Shope, and Preston A. Kiekel. Shared-Knowledge and Team Performance: A Cognitive Engineering Approach to Measurement. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, March 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada387718.
Full textKim, Hugh Hoikwang, Raimond Maurer, and Olivia Mitchell. How Cognitive Ability and Financial Literacy Shape the Demand for Financial Advice at Older Ages. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, April 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w25750.
Full text