Relevant bibliographies by topics / Self-incrimination

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters
  5. Conference papers

Academic literature on the topic 'Self-incrimination'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 30 July 2024

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Self-incrimination.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Self-incrimination"

1

Breslin, John. "Self‐incrimination: Recent Developments." Journal of Financial Crime 4, no. 1 (March 1996): 47–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb025754.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Decker, Jason. "Conciliation and Self-incrimination." Erkenntnis 79, no. 5 (January 29, 2014): 1099–134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10670-014-9599-8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Stuntz, William J. "Self-Incrimination and Excuse." Columbia Law Review 88, no. 6 (October 1988): 1227. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1122556.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

ROSEN, MURRAY. "THE PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF‐INCRIMINATION." Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance 1, no. 1 (January 1992): 116–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb024759.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Lamberigts, Stijn. "The Privilege against Self-Incrimination." New Journal of European Criminal Law 7, no. 4 (December 2016): 418–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/203228441600700404.

Full text
Abstract:
This article revisits the different justifications of the privilege against self-incrimination and examines two topical issues, the relation between the privilege and documentary evidence and the applicability of the privilege to corporations, in light of these justifications. Although the Presumption of Innocence Directive has recently addressed these two issues, several lingering uncertainties remain.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Roxin, Claus. "Involuntary Self-Incrimination and the Right to Privacy in Criminal Proceedings." Israel Law Review 31, no. 1-3 (1997): 74–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0021223700015247.

Full text
Abstract:
In any rule-of-law system the law of criminal procedure is bound to weigh the intended investigation of the truth against the interest of the person charged with a criminal offence in protecting his privacy. The German law of criminal procedure is a typical example of the permanent struggle with these conflicting demands. While the majority of the courts are making an effort to reinforce the protection provided to the accused, the latest pieces of legislation reveal a tendency of allowing increasingly far-reaching invasion of privacy. I will try to map out the most important aspects of this development.In doing so I will distinguish between state-enforced, involuntary self-incrimination and the right to privacy. These two problems overlap because enforced self-incrimination will often entail invasion of privacy and, conversely, because an invasion of privacy by the state will often result in involuntary self-incrimination. But although these problems are intertwined I will differentiate between them and I accept that there will be some overlapping. After all, there may be invasions of privacy without self-incrimination and there may be cases of self-incrimination which are not caused by an invasion of privacy.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Yanti, Ni Kadek Dripta, and I. Ketut Mertha. "EKSISTENSI SAKSI MAHKOTA DALAM PROSES PERADILAN PIDANA DI INDONESIA BERDASARKAN ASAS NON SELF INCRIMINATION." Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 12 (December 3, 2020): 1928. http://dx.doi.org/10.24843/ks.2020.v08.i12.p10.

Full text
Abstract:
Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui (1) eksistensi saksi mahkota dalam proses peradilan pidana di Indonesia berdasarkan asas non self incrimination; dan (2) perlindungan hukum terhadap saksi mahkota. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa (1) Eksistensi saksi mahkota dalam proses peradilan pidana di Indonesia berdasarkan asas non self incrimination sudah lazim digunakan. Kehadiran saksi mahkota baru dikatakan tidak bertentangan dengan asas non self incrimination jika dilakukan sesuai dengan apa yang diatur dalam Pasal 199 jo. Pasal 200 Rancangan KUHAP versi Januari 2009; dan (2) Perlindungan hukum terhadap saksi mahkota, seperti perlindungan terhadap saksi sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban, namun kepada saksi mahkota diberikan juga keringanan hukuman bahkan dibebaskan dari penuntutan jika peranannya dianggap yang paling ringan. The objective of this research to reveal (1) the existence of a crown witness in the criminal justice process in Indonesia based on the principle of non self-incrimination; and (2) legal protection of crown witnesses. The result of this research indicates that (1) The existence of crown witnesses in criminal justice processes in Indonesia based on the principle of non-self-incrimination is commonly used. The presence of a new crown witness is said not to contradict the principle of non-self-incrimination if it is carried out in accordance with Article 199 jo. Article 200 of the January 2009 version of the Draft Criminal Procedure Code; and (2) Legal protection for crown witnesses, such as protection for witnesses as regulated in Law Number 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims, however crown witnesses are also given leniency and even exemption from prosecution if their role is considered the lightest.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Howarth, William. "Self-Monitoring, Self-Policing, Self-Incrimination and Pollution Law." Modern Law Review 60, no. 2 (March 1997): 200–229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00075.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Dine, Janet. "Self incrimination and the Companies Act." Business Law Review 9, Issue 4 (April 1, 1988): 83–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/bula1988033.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Redmayne, M. "Rethinking the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination." Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 27, no. 2 (December 20, 2005): 209–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gql001.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Self-incrimination"

1

Groberman, Harvey M. "Protection against self-incrimination and the concept of unfairness in the law of evidence." Thesis, University of Oxford, 1989. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.317707.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Gauk, Christina. "Self-incrimination and silence : position of the defendant in England, the United States and Canada." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 1989. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.305442.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Cotton, John, and n/a. "The privilege against self-incrimination in civil proceedings between private parties in Australia and New Zealand : is derivative use immunity the answer?" University of Otago. Faculty of Law, 2007. http://adt.otago.ac.nz./public/adt-NZDU20070815.094307.

Full text
Abstract:
This thesis addresses the problem of the privilege against self-incrimination ("the privilege") in civil proceedings between private parties in Australia and New Zealand. This problem has been recognised by judges, law reform bodies and legislators in both countries for twenty years. However, the legislative response has been inadequate. The privilege is easily confused with other related concepts, particularly the right to silence in criminal proceedings. The reasons for the privilege in civil proceedings are not necessarily the same as for the right to silence. Care is therefore taken to define the terminology and scope of the thesis. It sets out the modern law on the privilege in civil proceedings between private parties. It describes how the privilege causes particular problems in those proceedings. It surveys the literature, finding that most of it concerns the right to silence. The thesis draws heavily on the history of the privilege. It argues that, although witness privilege came from the common law, the privilege in interlocutory civil proceedings had its origins in the discretionary remedies devised by the courts of equity. They were sensitive to abuse of their remedies. For the same reason, modern prosecutors should not be encouraged to rely excessively upon evidence acquired through compulsory powers. Derivative use immunity is one of several substitutes suggested for the privilege. The thesis looks at the various substitutes. It concludes that derivative use immunity is the only satisfactory substitute for the privilege in civil proceedings. Derivative use immunity originated in the United States. The thesis looks closely at the American experience. The history and scope of the Fifth Amendment are discussed in detail, particularly the supposed removal of its protection from documents. This will show that the removal of the privilege from documents is not as simple as law reform bodies in Australia and New Zealand suggest. Exaggerated claims have been made by Australian prosecutors about the problems caused by derivative use immunity. The claims are examined in the light of American case-law. This shows that an impossible burden is not imposed on prosecutors. The same point emerges when the thesis examines the operation of derivative use immunity under Australian certification procedures since 1995. Particular procedural and legislative difficulties need to be addressed, particularly when derivative use immunity replaces the privilege in interlocutory proceedings. However, certification by the court has an important advantage. The court�s exercise of its discretion provides the flexibility which automatic statutory immunity lacks. The question in the title is therefore answered in the affirmative. Derivative use immunity under a statutory certification procedure can provide the answer. Cooperation between the Commonwealth and States may be needed to overcome constitutional difficulties, but most other problems can be overcome if derivative use immunity is given a sound statutory basis.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

MELLO, BERNARDO CARVALHO DE. "NEMO TENETUR SE DETEGERE PRINCIPLE: PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION AND RIGHT TO SILENCE IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL ORDER." PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO DE JANEIRO, 2018. http://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/Busca_etds.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=36159@1.

Full text
Abstract:
PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO DE JANEIRO
COORDENAÇÃO DE APERFEIÇOAMENTO DO PESSOAL DE ENSINO SUPERIOR
PROGRAMA DE SUPORTE À PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO DE INSTS. DE ENSINO
PROGRAMA DE SUPORTE À PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO DE INSTITUIÇÕES COMUNITÁRIAS DE ENSINO PARTICULARES
O princípio nemo tenetur se detegere, em seu duplo aspecto vedação à autoincriminação e direito ao silêncio, é uma conquista civilizatória das sociedades democráticas. A importância do princípio, muitas vezes não explicitada nas discussões sobre a constitucionalidade dos institutos e leis, é de tamanha monta que, conjuntamente com o princípio da presunção de inocência, forma a base axiológica de todo o sistema processual penal democrático. Contudo, o poder Estatal, diante do apelo popular e em resposta aos altos índices de criminalidade e episódios notórios de corrupção no Brasil tem, nos últimos tempos, a partir de uma continuidade cronológica de legislações, relativizado ou erodido os sustentáculos do princípio nemo tenetur se detegere. Tal postura Estatal consubstancia o que na criminologia se denomina de direito penal do inimigo, que servirá de substrato teórico para explicar o porquê do fenômeno de hipercriminalização e recrudescimento Estatal. A pesquisa visa, portanto, reafirmar o valor do nemo tenetur se detegere, acentuando os casos em que está a sofrer ataques e oferecer, a partir de pesquisa doutrinária e da análise jurisprudencial nacional e estrangeira, possíveis salvaguardas ao princípio com vistas a garantir que o processo penal brasileiro continue a respeitar os direitos individuais inerentes a uma ordem constitucional de fato e não meramente de direito.
The principle nemo tenetur se detegere, in its double aspect privilege against self-incrimination and right to silence, is a civilizational conquest of democratic societies. The importance of this principle, which is often not made explicit in the discussions on the constitutionality of institutes and laws, is so significant that, together with the principle of presumption of innocence, forms the axiological basis of the entire democratic criminal procedural system. However, the State power, in the face of popular appeal and in response to high crime rates and notorious episodes of corruption in Brazil, has recently, from a chronological continuity of legislation, relativized or eroded the pillars of the nemo tenetur se detegere principle. This state posture consubstantiates what in criminology is called the criminal law of the enemy, which will serve as a theoretical substrate to explain the phenomenon of hypercriminalization and State recrudescence. The aim of the research is to reaffirm the value of the nemo tenetur, to highlight the cases in which it is under attack and to offer possible safeguards to the principle, based on jurisprudencial research and national and foreign case analysis, with a view to ensuring that the Brazilian criminal proceeding continues to respect the individual rights inherent in a constitutional order of fact and not merely law.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Ebrahim, Suleiman. "The constitutionality of section 60 (11B)(c) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1997 where an applicant for bail relies on a weak state's case during a section 60(11)(a) application." Diss., University of Pretoria, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/2263/65645.

Full text
Abstract:
In South Africa, as in most jurisdictions which profess to be based on an open and democratic society based on human dignity, equality and freedom, the right against compelled self-incrimination is a guaranteed Constitutional right. This study is prompted by the realization that the right against self-incrimination is being undermined and eroded by an aspect of South Africa’s bail laws. The current study addresses the constitutional validity of section 60(11B)(c) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 in so far as it allows for the admission of incriminating evidence at trial, in contravention of the accused’s right against self-incrimination, which incriminatory evidence was tendered by the applicant during a bail application in circumstances where the applicant was compelled to prove that he would be acquitted at trial where reliance is placed on a weak State’s case in proving exceptional circumstances in compliance with section 60(11)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977. Whilst section 60(11B)(c) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 is undoubtedly aimed at combatting crime, the pre-occupation with crime control measures threatens to undermine individual liberty and poses a threat to our Constitutional project of building a human rights culture. I advance an argument which supports the view that section 60(11B)(c) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 is unconstitutional, in the above context, in that it infringes upon the accused’s right against compelled self-incrimination at trial and does not amount to a justifiable limitation on the rights of an accused in an open and democratic society based on human dignity, equality and freedom. I also advance an alternative legal remedy aimed at fulfilling the initial mischief which Section 60(11B)(c) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 was designed to prevent in order to bring the section in line with the Constitution and a rights-based society.
Mini Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2017.
Procedural Law
LLM
Unrestricted
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Blackwood, Hayley L. Rogers Richard. "A comparison of Miranda procedures the effects of oral and written administrations on Miranda comprehension /." [Denton, Tex.] : University of North Texas, 2009. http://digital.library.unt.edu/permalink/meta-dc-11057.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

AMARAL, THIAGO BOTTINO DO. "FROM THE RIGHT TO SILENCE TO THE PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION: THE SUPREME COURT AND THE CONSOLIDATION OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL GUARANTEES." PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO DE JANEIRO, 2008. http://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/Busca_etds.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=14970@1.

Full text
Abstract:
CONSELHO NACIONAL DE DESENVOLVIMENTO CIENTÍFICO E TECNOLÓGICO
A presente tese de doutorado tem por objetivo analisar criticamente a construção pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal de significados para o direito ao silêncio – ou melhor, a garantia de vedação de auto-incriminação – que constitui uma garantia processual penal de assento constitucional. Foram identificados e analisados todos os acórdãos proferidos pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal acerca do tema a fim de examinar os argumentos utilizados na fundamentação das decisões que delimitam o conteúdo da referida garantia,, desde a promulgação da Constituição de 1988 até o dia 31 de dezembro de 2007, para identificar como o Supremo Tribunal Federal construiu um significado que fosse aquém ou além da simples interpretação gramatical da Constituição. A escolha da vedação de autoincriminação como objeto de estudo é resultado do reconhecimento de que essa garantia desempenha um papel estruturante na construção de um sistema punitivo compatível com um Estado democrático de direito. O exame dos julgados indica que esse conteúdo foi construído por meio de diferentes recursos, como o uso de precedentes jurisprudenciais de cortes internacionais e a interpretação a partir dos tratados internacionais de direitos humanos. Mas, sobretudo, o Supremo Tribunal Federal lançou mão do uso de argumentos principiológicos como forma de aproximar o texto constitucional (e o infraconstitucional) dos valores que animam um Estado democrático de direito.
This doctoral thesis aims to examine and criticize the construction by the Brazilian Supreme Court (Supremo Tribunal Federal, STF) of a concept to the right to silence – or rather, the privilege against self-incrimination – which is a criminal procedure guarantee, established in the Brazilian Constitution. All judgments of the Brazilian Supreme Court related to the privilege, since the promulgation of the Constitution (October 5, 1988) until December 31, 2007, were identified and analyzed, seeking to identify in what form the Brazilian Supreme Court defined that privilege (behind or beyond simply grammatical interpretation of the Constitution). Choosing the privilege against selfincrimination as the object of study results of the recognition that this right plays a structural role in the construction of a punitive system compatible with a democratic rule of law. Examination of all cases indicates that the privilege content was built through various resources, such as international courts decisions and international human rights treaties. But above all, the Brazilian Supreme Court has used principles arguments as a way to bring the constitutional text closer to the values that animate a democratic rule of law.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Heinsohn, Brian D. "Effects of pleading the fifth amendment on juridic decisions." Virtual Press, 1997. http://liblink.bsu.edu/uhtbin/catkey/1045623.

Full text
Abstract:
This study examined the effects that a defendant's pleading of the fifth amendment during a criminal trial had on simulated juror's decisions regarding verdict, likelihood of guilt, certainty of guilt, sentence severity, and perceptions of the defendant's character. One hundred fifty-five undergraduate psychology students read one of three versions of a transcript, based on a trial of a man charged with theft, in which the defendant did not plead the fifth (control), plead the fifth, or plead the fifth possibly for reasons other than hiding involvement in the crime (i.e. having an affair). Results showed that the two fifth amendment conditions found the defendant to be more likely guilty than the control condition. Also, a factor analysis suggested that an honest and a relaxed dimension best described the defendant's character. In addition, it was discovered that perceptions of the defendant's honesty mediated the effects of perceived likelihood of guilt.
Department of Psychological Science
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Smith, Brooke A. "Pleading the fifth the effect of a defendant's ethnicity and prior record /." To access this resource online via ProQuest Dissertations and Theses @ UTEP, 2008. http://0-proquest.umi.com.lib.utep.edu/login?COPT=REJTPTU0YmImSU5UPTAmVkVSPTI=&clientId=2515.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Aselmann, Maike. "Die Selbstbelastungs- und Verteidigungsfreiheit : ein Beitrag zu den Garantiewirkungen von Verfahrensrechten im Hinblick auf die Beweiswürdigung, Strafzumessung und Strafbarkeit des Beschuldigten im Strafprozess /." Frankfurt am Main [u.a.] : Lang, 2004. http://www.gbv.de/dms/sbb-berlin/389589470.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Self-incrimination"

1

Singer, Randy. Self incrimination. Carol Stream, Ill: Tyndale House Publishers, 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Merino, Noël. Self-incrimination. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2014.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Kimberly, Troisi-Paton, ed. The right against self-incrimination. San Diego, Calif: Greenhaven Press, 2006.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

New Zealand. Law Commission. The privilege against self-incrimination: A discussion paper. Wellington, N.Z: The Commission, 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Wang, Shifan. Bu zi zheng ji zui yuan ze =: Nemo tenetur. [Taibei]: Gong yi xin tuo chun feng xu ri xue shu ji jin, 2007.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Duțu, Mircea. Dreptul la tăcere: Noțiune, semnificații, jurisprudență : CEDO, CJCE, franceză, română. București: Editura Economică, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Kraft, Oliver Kai-Eric. Das Nemo tenetur-Prinzip und die sich daraus ergebenden Rechte des Beschuldigten in der polizeilichen Vernehmung: Eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung des amerikanischen und deutschen Strafprozessrechts. Hamburg: Kovač, 2002.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Marafioti, Luca. Scelte autodifensive dell'indagato e alternative al silenzio. Torino: G. Giappichelli, 2000.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Great Britain. Home Office. Working Group on the Right of Silence. Report of the Working Group on the Right of Silence. London: C4 Division, Home Office, 1989.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

American Bar Association. Section of Antitrust Law., ed. The right against self-incrimination in civil litigation. Chicago, Ill: Section of Antitrust Law, ABA, 2001.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Self-incrimination"

1

De Fabrique, Nathalie. "Self-Incrimination." In Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2239. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79948-3_1025.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

DeFabrique, Nathalie. "Self-Incrimination." In Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology, 1. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56782-2_1025-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

DeFabrique, Nathalie. "Self-Incrimination." In Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology, 3117. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_1025.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Kanovitz, Jacqueline R., Jefferson L. Ingram, and Christopher J. Devine. "Compulsory Self-Incrimination." In Constitutional Law for Criminal Justice, 385–415. 15th edition. | New York, NY : Routledge, 2018. | Series: John C. Klotter justice administration legal series: Routledge, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429469886-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Kanovitz, Jacqueline R., Jefferson L. Ingram, and Christopher J. Devine. "Compulsory Self-Incrimination." In Constitutional Law for Criminal Justice, 369–97. 16th ed. New York: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003247173-8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Jämsä, Jurkka. "The privilege against self-incrimination." In Fair Trial Rules of Evidence, 57–95. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003311416-5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Daniels, Simon. "Investigations, evidence and self-incrimination." In Responsibility and Accountability in Maritime Law, 113–28. London: Informa Law from Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003266839-9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Ingram, Jefferson L. "Confession and the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination." In Criminal Procedure, 465–99. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429352973-11.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Blitz, Marc Jonathan. "The Fifth Amendment: Self-Incrimination and the Brain." In Searching Minds by Scanning Brains, 59–79. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50004-1_4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Doak, Jonathan, Claire McGourlay, and Mark Thomas. "The Privilege against Self-incrimination and the Right to Silence." In Evidence: Law and Context, 176–200. [Fifth edition]. | Abingdon, Oxon [UK]; New York, NY:: Routledge, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315166285-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Self-incrimination"

1

BERKOVICH, O. E., S. V. AKULIN, V. A. TUMANSKAYA, and T. V. IVANTSOVA. "MOTIVES OF SELF-INCRIMINATION AND METHODS OF ITS EXPOSURE." In CHALLENGES AND QUESTIONS MODERN SCIENCE part 2. ЦНК МОАН, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.18411/pivsn-03-2019-38.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Lienen, Christina. "So Long, Farewell’ The Judicial Disenchantment with the Privilege against Self-Incrimination in the UK." In 6th Annual International Conference on Law, Regulations and Public Policy (LRPP 2017). Global Science & Technology Forum (GSTF), 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.5176/2251-3809_lrpp17.24.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Self-incrimination' for particular source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography