Relevant bibliographies by topics / Seismic risk, masonry buildings in aggregate, seismic performance-based assessment, nonlinear static (pushover) analysis

Academic literature on the topic 'Seismic risk, masonry buildings in aggregate, seismic performance-based assessment, nonlinear static (pushover) analysis'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 10 March 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Contents

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Seismic risk, masonry buildings in aggregate, seismic performance-based assessment, nonlinear static (pushover) analysis.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Seismic risk, masonry buildings in aggregate, seismic performance-based assessment, nonlinear static (pushover) analysis"

1

Doiphode, Dr G. S., and Vaibhav Dhndhukiya. "Performance Based Seismic Assessment of Masonry Infilled RCC Building with Diaphragm Discontinuity." International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology 10, no. 2 (December 30, 2020): 214–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.b2090.1210220.

Full text
Abstract:
In multistoreyed RCC framed buildings, critical damages are due to seismic ground excitations, which cause catastrophic failuresat the weaker locations. Buildings with two types of structural irregularities namely diaphragm discontinuity and open ground story are considered. Assessment of seismic vulnerability of these buildings is done by using Nonlinear Static Pushover Analysis (NSPA). Performance Based Seismic Design of masonry infilled RCC buildings with two different shape of openings in the diaphragm is considered here with Design Basis Earthquake(DBE) and Maximum Considered Earthquake(MCE) where by selecting appropriate performance criteria in terms of Inter-story drift ratio(IDR) and Inelastic displacement demand ratio(IDDR) are critically observed. The Equivalent Linearization Procedure of Pushover analysis presented in FEMA 440, which is a modification of Capacity Spectrum Method based on ATC-40 guidelines, is performed in ETABS-2016 to study the performance of R.C.C. buildings with diaphragm discontinuity, designed as per IS-1893-2016.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Gadagamma, Chaitanya Krishna, Aung Ko Min, Hideomi Gokon, Kimiro Meguro, and Khin Than Yu. "Development of Fragility Functions of RC Buildings in Yangon City Using Push over Analysis." Journal of Disaster Research 13, no. 1 (February 20, 2018): 31–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2018.p0031.

Full text
Abstract:
The recent apprehensions about active seismicity in Myanmar is a reminder of the significant hazards caused by earthquakes. Since some cities are subjected to high seismic risk, its assessment can be invaluable for disaster mitigation. This study focused on the development of fragility/damage probability functions for reinforced concrete (RC) buildings in Yangon city because seismic vulnerability assessment is being an essential component of risk evaluation. Nonlinear static pushover analysis is carried out on a group of 54 RC buildings (39 low-rises and 15 high-rises) by varying the material strengths, as well as and analysis based on capacity curves over the demand spectrum with fixed performance points representing the damage probability as a function of both spectral displacement and ground accelerations.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Zine, Ali, Abdelkrim Kadid, and Abdallah Zatar. "Effect of Masonry Infill Panels on the Seismic Response of Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures." Civil Engineering Journal 7, no. 11 (November 1, 2021): 1853–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.28991/cej-2021-03091764.

Full text
Abstract:
The present work concerns the numerical investigation of reinforced concrete frame buildings containing masonry infill panel under seismic loading that are widely used even in high seismicity areas. In seismic zones, these frames with masonry infill panels are generally considered as higher earthquake risk buildings. As a result there is a growing need to evaluate their level of seismic performance. The numerical modelling of infilled frames structures is a complex task, as they exhibit highly nonlinear inelastic behaviour, due to the interaction of the masonry infill panel and the surrounding frame. The available modelling approaches for masonry infill can be grouped into two principal types; Micro models and Macro models. A two dimensional model of the structure is used to carry out non-linear static analysis. Beams and columns are modelled as non-linear with lumped plasticity where the hinges are concentrated at both ends of the beams and the columns. This study is based on structures with design and detailing characteristics typical of Algerian construction model. In this regard, a non-linear pushover analysis has been conducted on three considered structures, of two, four and eight stories. Each structure is analysed as a bare frame and with two different infill configurations (totally infilled, and partially infilled). The main results that can be obtained from a pushover analysis are the capacity curves and the distribution of plastic hinges in structures. The addition of infill walls results in an increase in both the rigidity and strength of the structures. The results indicate that the presence of non-structural masonry infills can significantly modify the seismic response of reinforced concrete "frames". The initial rigidity and strength of the fully filled frame are considerably improved and the patterns of the hinges are influenced by structural elements type depending on the dynamic characteristics of the structures. Doi: 10.28991/cej-2021-03091764 Full Text: PDF
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Ravichandran, Nagavinothini, Daniele Losanno, and Fulvio Parisi. "Comparative assessment of finite element macro-modelling approaches for seismic analysis of non-engineered masonry constructions." Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, July 16, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01180-3.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractAll around the world, non-engineered masonry constructions (NECs) typically have high vulnerability to seismic ground motion, resulting in heavy damage and severe casualties after earthquakes. Even though a number of computational strategies have been developed for seismic analysis of unreinforced masonry structures, a few studies have focussed on NECs located in developing countries. In this paper, different modelling options for finite element analysis of non-engineered masonry buildings are investigated. The goal of the study was to identify the modelling option with the best trade-off between computational burden and accuracy of results, in view of seismic risk assessment of NECs at regional scale. Based on the experimental behaviour of a single-storey structure representative of Indian non-engineered masonry buildings, the output of seismic response analysis of refined 3D models in ANSYS was compared to that of a simplified model based on 2D, nonlinear, layered shell elements in SAP2000. The numerical-experimental comparison was carried out under incremental static lateral loading, whereas nonlinear time history analysis was performed to investigate the dynamic performance of the case-study structure. Analysis results show that the simplified model can be a computationally efficient modelling option for both nonlinear static and dynamic analyses, particularly in case of force-based approaches for design and assessment of base isolation systems aimed at the large-scale seismic vulnerability mitigation of NECs.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

"Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of a Reinforced Concrete Building Located in India." International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering 8, no. 11S (October 11, 2019): 310–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.k1059.09811s19.

Full text
Abstract:
Over the recent years the natural disaster especially due to the earthquake effect on buildings increases which causes loss of life and property in many places all over the world. The latest development leads to finding the direct losses and damage states of the buildings for various intensities of earthquake ground motions. In the present study, seismic vulnerability assessment was done for a medium rise building (G+5). The design peak ground acceleration of 0.16g and 0.36g were considered for the risk assessment. The nonlinear static pushover analysis was done to fine the performance point, spectral acceleration and corresponding spectral acceleration by Equivalent Linearization (EL) method given by Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA-440). The four damage states such as slight, moderate, extreme and collapse has been considered as per HAZUS-MR4. The seismic vulnerability in terms of fragility curves was developed to evaluate the damage probabilities based on HAZUS methodology. The discrete and cumulative damage probability was found for all the damage states of the building which shows the building at 0.16g experience slight damage whereas at 0.36g the moderate damage state equally becomes predominant.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Arslantürkoglu, Safak, and Bozidar Stojadinovic. "Seismic fatality risk evaluation framework for existing buildings in Switzerland." Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, December 7, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01558-x.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThe Swiss code SIA 269/8 for the seismic evaluation of existing structures is risk-based. It relies on the compliance factor αeff, defined as the ratio of the seismic capacity of an existing structure to the required seismic capacity of a hypothetical identical new structure, to indirectly evaluate the casualty risk posed by the existing structure. While it is convenient to have a direct relationship between the casualty risk and the degree of code compliance of the existing structure, it is debatable if the contributions of the seismic hazard, structural performance and occupancy to the casualty risk should be merged into a single quantity, conflicting with the multi-component nature of seismic risk. This paper presents a graphical framework to evaluate the seismic fatality risk for existing buildings. The framework is based on the PEER Center performance-based earthquake engineering methodology to provide a transparent view of the contributions of different sources of hazard and risk. Starting from a seismic hazard model, probabilistic seismic demand, damage and loss models are introduced, taking the uncertainty into account at each step. The final product of the proposed framework, a loss curve representing the (annual) exceedance rate of fatality counts, enables engineers and building owners to make better, risk-based decisions. The proposed framework is demonstrated for an existing building in Switzerland. Notably, in addition to the SIA 269/8 evaluation method, this demonstration compares eight hybrid approaches differentiated by the utilized structural assessment techniques (nonlinear static pushover vs. incremental dynamic analysis), uncertainty propagation in the demand model (record variability only vs. record variability and epistemic uncertainty) and solution strategies (closed-form vs. numerical) to find a practical compromise between the accuracy and the computational effort. A comparison of the obtained results shows that the SIA 269/8 evaluation method underestimates the fatality risk for the presented building and identifies a practical alternative based on the proposed graphical framework.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Seismic risk, masonry buildings in aggregate, seismic performance-based assessment, nonlinear static (pushover) analysis"

1

Croce, Pietro, Maria Luisa Beconcini, Paolo Formichi, Filippo Landi, Benedetta Puccini, and Vincenzo Zotti. "Seismic risk evaluation of existing masonry buildings: methods and uncertainties." In IABSE Congress, New York, New York 2019: The Evolving Metropolis. Zurich, Switzerland: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE), 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2749/newyork.2019.2509.

Full text
Abstract:
<p>Masonry structures represent a large part of existing buildings. As confirmed by the damage caused by recent seismic events, the assessment of seismic performance of existing masonry building is then a critical issue in Countries exposed to seismic risk. Moreover, common methods of analysis based on non-linear static approach are significantly influenced by the assumptions about the shear behavior of masonry walls and may lead to inconsistent or contradictory results.</p><p>Due to the relevance of the problem ad hoc studies have been performed to clarify how the most relevant parameters affect the theoretical structural behavior and to setup a proper method to define these parameters.</p><p>In the paper, the main sources of uncertainties regarding the definition of material parameters are investigated and a methodology for the identification of masonry classes is illustrated discussing the propagation of uncertainties related to masonry parameters in non-linear static analysis of masonry buildings. The analysis are carried out through a simplified non-linear pushover type algorithm developed by the authors and the outcomes are illustrated and critically discussed for a relevant case study.</p><p>The results show the capability of the proposed procedure for the identification of masonry classes and the evaluation of masonry mechanical parameters to provide a more refined probabilistic assessment of the seismic risk index.</p>
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Beconcini, Maria Luisa, Paolo Cioni, Pietro Croce, Paolo Formichi, Filippo Landi, and Caterina Mochi. "Influence of shear modulus and drift capacity on non-linear static analysis of masonry buildings." In IABSE Symposium, Guimarães 2019: Towards a Resilient Built Environment Risk and Asset Management. Zurich, Switzerland: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE), 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2749/guimaraes.2019.0876.

Full text
Abstract:
<p>In nonlinear static analysis of masonry buildings, the hysteric behaviour of masonry walls is commonly idealized through a bi-linear resistance envelope defined by the lateral stiffness of the wall, the ultimate shear resistance and the ultimate inter-storey drift. Therefore, it becomes fundamental to properly set the modulus of elasticity and shear modulus for masonry as well as to properly evaluate the drift capacity of the walls.</p><p>In the paper, the combined influence of shear modulus and drift capacity definition on the assessment of seismic performance of masonry buildings is investigated in details by means of a simplified non-linear pushover type algorithm developed by the authors. In particular, two different definitions are considered for the drift capacity, in terms of ductility and in terms of percentage of the inter-storey height, while for the shear modulus a reasonable set of values is investigated according a database collected combining masonry test results available in the relevant scientific literature with an in situ experimental campaign carried out by the authors.</p><p>The results show how the variation in shear modulus can lead to conflicting outcomes for the evaluation of seismic performance of masonry buildings depending on the assumed definition of drift capacity.</p>
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography