Academic literature on the topic 'Seismic design - Building'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Seismic design - Building.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Seismic design - Building"

1

Liu, Yue Wei, and Yang Zhou. "Seismic Rotations and Rotational Seismic Input for Building Design." Applied Mechanics and Materials 405-408 (September 2013): 1953–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.405-408.1953.

Full text
Abstract:
The rotational seismic inputs for building design were discussed. The free ground rotations and the relation between free ground rotations and basement rotations were derived. The results show that the relation depends on the basement size, site and seismic frequency. For most building, the differences between the free ground rotations and the basement rotations are small. The suggestion is that for tall buildings the free ground rotations can be taken as the seismic input, but for low-rise building with large basement, the response spectra in short period region should be reduced.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Liu, Zihao. "Review Seismic Properties High-Rise Building Structures." Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology 10 (August 16, 2022): 25–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.54097/hset.v10i.1209.

Full text
Abstract:
With the continuous innovation and reform of the construction industry, the research methods of seismic performance of high-rise building structures have changed. The effect of seismic performance affects the quality and safety of high-rise buildings. For another, earthquake disasters threaten people's life and property safety, and also affect building safety. The seismic performance of buildings should be fully considered in the structural design of high-rise buildings, strictly control the key points of seismic design and improve the seismic performance of high-rise building structures. Combined with the content of seismic performance design of high-rise buildings, this paper discusses the problems existing in the design, and puts forward the corresponding solutions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Mays, Timothy Wayne. "Seismic Design of Lightweight Metal Building Systems." Earthquake Spectra 17, no. 1 (2001): 37–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1193/1.1586165.

Full text
Abstract:
As a result of failures uncovered after the Northridge earthquake, the AISC Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings has become extremely stringent in its design provisions for moment frame structures. Although the changes are justified, they are not necessary for every type of building system. Some structures can be safely designed to resist earthquake forces elastically without concern of structural collapse. Metal buildings are typically lightweight, and small inertia forces from the design earthquake will not usually result in an inelastic response of a system that is properly designed to resist wind forces. In this paper, metal building systems are analyzed using an equivalent lateral force method and a linear time history analysis to show that typical metal building systems will respond elastically to the design earthquake. Specifically, using the International Building Code along with the aforementioned document, it is shown in the following sections that for lightweight metal building structures, adherence to the AISC Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings is not required in most cases except for locations on the West Coast and a few regions east of the Rocky Mountains. Elastic design methodology is discussed and design recommendations applicable to metal building systems are provided.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Kuramoto, Hiroshi. "A Short Note for Dr. Watabe’s Review in 1974." Journal of Disaster Research 1, no. 3 (2006): 357. http://dx.doi.org/10.20965/jdr.2006.p0357.

Full text
Abstract:
In the preceding article, I reviewed two seismic design codes of the Building Standard Law of Japan, revised in 1981 and 2000, with the transition of Japanese seismic design codes. Having read the 1974 review by Dr. Makoto Watabe, I was most impressed by his comprehensive understanding of seismic structural systems for buildings – an understanding that is fresh even today, more than 3 decades later. He moves from the basic principles for seismic building design to earthquake-resistant properties of building. The general seismic design principles of buildings he has reviewed are very sound and introduced both in current seismic design codes I have reviewed and the seismic design of super high-rise buildings over 60 m high.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Han, Jong-Bom. "Research on determining the aseismic performance level of reinforced concrete building." International Journal of Architecture and Urbanism 5, no. 2 (2021): 246–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.32734/ijau.v5i2.6682.

Full text
Abstract:
In seismic design based on performance, seismic performance level is determined based on failure state of the building and seismic design objective is set according to the importance of the buildings. In many countries, they calculate the seismic reaction of the buildings with the use of structural design programs to check the aseismic performance through the nonlinear static analysis method. In this paper, we established seismic performance levels and aseismic design objective to design on the basis of design objective according to the three levels in Seismic Design Code of Building, DPR Korea, 2010.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Naghshineh, Ali, Ashutosh Bagchi, and Fariborz M. Tehrani. "Seismic Resilience and Design Factors of Inline Seismic Friction Dampers (ISFDs)." Eng 4, no. 3 (2023): 2015–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/eng4030114.

Full text
Abstract:
While damping devices can provide supplemental damping to mitigate building vibration due to wind or earthquake effects, integrating them into the design is more complex. For example, the Canadian code does not provide building designs with inline friction dampers. The objective of this present article was to study the overstrength, ductility, and response modification factors of concrete frame buildings with inline friction dampers in the Canadian context. For that purpose, a set of four-, eight-, and fourteen-story ductile concrete frames with inline seismic friction dampers, designed based on the 2015 National Building Code of Canada (NBCC), was considered. The analyses included pushover analysis in determining seismic characteristics and dynamic response history analysis using twenty-five ground motion records to assess the seismic performance of the buildings equipped with inline seismic friction dampers. The methodology considered diagonal braces, including different 6 m and 8 m span lengths. The discussion covers the prescribed design values for overstrength, ductility, and response modification factors, as well as the performance assessment of the buildings. The results revealed that increasing the height of the structure and reducing the span length increases the response modification factors.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Yang, Lei. "Study on Optimization Seismic Design of Tall Building Structure." World Construction 4, no. 2 (2015): 17. http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/wc.v4i2.47.

Full text
Abstract:
<p>The heavy casualties and property losses caused by the earthquake this huge disaster, making high-rise building seismic become the focus of attention. Our new building seismic design code (GB50011-2001) (hereinafter referred to as "Seismic Design Code”) continue to be used (GBJ-89) specification to determine the "three earthquake performance objectives, two-stage design step" seismic design, and made many important supplement and perfect. The new seismic design of buildings in terms of requirements for introducing means as constraints optimization design, optimization design closer to engineering practice.</p>
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Yang, Lei. "Study on Optimization Seismic Design of Tall Building Structure." World Construction 4, no. 2 (2015): 17. http://dx.doi.org/10.18686/wcj.v4i2.5.

Full text
Abstract:
<p>The heavy casualties and property losses caused by the earthquake this huge disaster, making high-rise building seismic become the focus of attention. Our new building seismic design code (GB50011-2001) (hereinafter referred to as "Seismic Design Code”) continue to be used (GBJ-89) specification to determine the "three earthquake performance objectives, two-stage design step" seismic design, and made many important supplement and perfect. The new seismic design of buildings in terms of requirements for introducing means as constraints optimization design, optimization design closer to engineering practice.</p>
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Yang, Zedong. "Comparison of seismic structure design in the world." Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology 28 (December 31, 2022): 70–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.54097/hset.v28i.4063.

Full text
Abstract:
Aseismic performance is one of the important technical indexes of modern buildings, which has been written into the building codes in various countries. Aseismic structure design is to enhance the stability of the building structure, ensure the safety of the building when the earthquake disaster occurs, reduce the loss and casualties. Since ancient times, innovations have been made in the design of seismic structures worldwide, especially in areas with high earthquake incidence. It was found in the previous research that the calculation method and design of seismic structures in American and Chinese building codes are different. Based on the interest of aseismic design, this paper summarizes the traditional and new aseismic structures. This paper first introduces several commonly used aseismic structures, such as multi-storey masonry, frame and seismic wall construction. Then this paper introduces the characteristics and differences of aseismic structure design in different countries from the modern and ancient time dimensions. In the end, Finally, it is concluded that the seismic structures are different due to the differences of geography, culture and climate in various countries. We can learn from the seismic structure analysis of ancient buildings that Aseismic structure design does not have to resist earthquake, but can reduce the damage of earthquake to the building by reducing the seismic force of the building.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Malhotra, Praveen K. "Seismic Risk and Design Loads." Earthquake Spectra 22, no. 1 (2006): 115–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1193/1.2161185.

Full text
Abstract:
The 2003 International Building Code seismic design procedures do not result in uniform risk throughout the country. A comparison is made between the expected lifetime damage to two identical buildings—one in the western United States and other in the central United States. The seismic design accelerations are the same for these buildings, but the expected lifetime damage is very different. The causes of this difference are discussed in the paper.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography