Academic literature on the topic 'Section of Antitrust Law'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Section of Antitrust Law.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Section of Antitrust Law"
Francis, Daniel. "Exclusion, Invasion and Abuse: Competition Law and its Constitutional Context." Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 12 (2010): 183–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1528887000001798.
Full textFrancis, Daniel. "Exclusion, Invasion and Abuse: Competition Law and its Constitutional Context." Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 12 (2010): 183–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.5235/152888712802636175.
Full textWeber Waller, Spencer. "ABA Section of Antitrust Law, Intellectual Property and Antitrust Handbook, (2007)." World Competition 30, Issue 3 (September 1, 2007): 531–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/woco2007034.
Full textEdelman, Jonathan. "Reviving Antitrust Enforcement in the Airline Industry." Michigan Law Review, no. 120.1 (2021): 125. http://dx.doi.org/10.36644/mlr.120.2.reviving.
Full textGilmore, Debra A. "The Antitrust Implications of Boycotts by Health Care Professionals: Professional Standards, Professional Ethics and The First Amendment." American Journal of Law & Medicine 14, no. 2-3 (1988): 221–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0098858800006262.
Full textWeber Waller, Spencer. "Book Review: ABA Section of Antitrust Law, Antitrust Class Action Handbook (2010)." World Competition 33, Issue 3 (September 1, 2010): 542. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/woco2010043.
Full textWeber Waller, Spencer. "Book Review: ABA Section of Antitrust Law, Antitrust and Associations Handbook (2009)." World Competition 32, Issue 3 (September 1, 2009): 437–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/woco2009041.
Full textWeber Waller, Spencer, and Jennifer Woods. "Antitrust Transitions." World Competition 32, Issue 2 (June 1, 2009): 189–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/woco2009019.
Full textCurfman, Gregory. "Law Journals, Biomedical Journals, and Restraint of Trade." Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 50, no. 1 (2022): 195–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jme.2022.25.
Full textBush, Darren. "Book Review: American Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law: Transportation Antitrust Handbook (ABA, 2014)." World Competition 38, Issue 3 (September 1, 2015): 464–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/woco2015036.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Section of Antitrust Law"
Aydemir, Duygu. "Regulatory Framework Of The Sector-specific And Competition Rules In The Telecommunications Sector In Turkey In The Light Of The Eu Law." Master's thesis, METU, 2008. http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12609553/index.pdf.
Full textioglu-Ö
z May 2008, 189 pages This thesis examines the role of the sector-specific rules and competition rules in the liberalized telecommunications markets. It aims to analyse the design of the legal and institutional framework of these two sets of rules in the liberalized telecommunications sector in Turkey in the light of the EU law. To this purpose, the thesis initially compares and contrasts the main characteristics of and shared responsibilities between the sector-specific and economy-wide competition rules and institutions in the post-liberalization and post-privatization period. Then, the thesis explores the EU approach on the balance of influence between these two sets of rules and institutions. Against this background, the thesis examines role, design and interaction of the sector-specific and competition rules and institutions in the recently liberalized Turkish telecommunications markets. It, also, analyses some important competition law cases concluded by the Competition Authority. The thesis has two main arguments. Firstly, it argues that liberalization and privatization in the telecommunications sector does not automatically lead to the competitive environment in the sector. Competitiveness of the markets after the postliberalization and post-privatization period critically depends on the existence of a robust, coherent, and transparent regulatory framework ensuring a smooth balance between the sector-specific and the competition rules and institutions. Second argument is that sector-specific rules have a transitional character. As telecommunications markets move towards effective competition, sector-specific regulation will be reduced and the role of the competition rules in those markets will increase.
Al-Ameen, Hammeed Abayomi. "Antitrust : the person-centred approach." Thesis, Swansea University, 2012. https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa42765.
Full textPuffer-Mariette, Jean-Christophe. "Die Effektivität von Kronzeugenregelungen im Kartellrecht : eine Analyse und Bewertung des amerikanischen, europäischen, deutschen und französischen Leniency-Programms /." Baden-Baden : Nomos, 2008. http://d-nb.info/98805700X/04.
Full textDabbah, Maher. "Building global antitrust policy : law and politics." Thesis, King's College London (University of London), 2001. https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/theses/building-global-antitrust-policy--law-and-politics(d5c2ecd1-9495-49f4-89d9-340b2c83e39f).html.
Full textLe, More Pauline. "Le droit et les cartels internationaux /." Thesis, McGill University, 2003. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=80936.
Full textFinkelstein, Eric. "Antitrust issues in hospital markets /." Thesis, Connect to this title online; UW restricted, 1998. http://hdl.handle.net/1773/7437.
Full textGlader, Marcus. "Innovation markets and competition analysis : EU competition law and US antitrust law /." Lund : Faculty of Law, Lund Univ, 2004. http://www.gbv.de/dms/spk/sbb/recht/toc/476526825.pdf.
Full textMartínez, Mata Yolanda. "Abuso de dominio en el sector farmacéutico." Doctoral thesis, Universitat de Barcelona, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/482189.
Full textEl sector farmacèutic és un dels sectors empresarials en què la tensió entre el Dret de la Competència i el Dret de la Propietat Intel·lectual és més evident. Els objectius de cadascun d’aquests àmbits normatius són, en la seva pròpia essència, contraposats i, tanmateix, tots dos són socialment desitjables. L’aplicació de l’article 102 TFUE al sector farmacèutic constitueix una de les manifestacions d’aquesta tensió i, malgrat l’extens debat doctrinal al respecte, continuen sense estar clares les línies divisòries entre un i altre àmbit normatiu. En aquesta tesi ens endinsem en l’exploració d’aquestes línies divisòries, amb la perspectiva que ofereix el transcurs de pràcticament una dècada d’ençà que la Comissió Europea publicà els resultats de llur investigació sectorial en l’àmbit farmacèutic. Aquesta dècada ha ofert només uns pocs assumptes i alguns d’ells estan encara pendents de recurs davant dels tribunals comunitaris. Malgrat ésser escassos, aquests assumptes permeten ja percebre algunes línies de convergència entre els diferents tipus d’abús en el sector farmacèutic i oferir una aproximació sistemàtica a l’aplicació de l’article 102 TFUE a aquest sector. Els assumptes d’abús en els quals la conducta de l’operador dominant ha cercat beneficiar-se d’una regulació sectorial fragmentària sense anar més enllà d’allò que aquella regulació permetia, però en contra dels objectius del mercat interior (cas Glaxo Grècia i és possible que en un futur també el cas Aspen), requereixen una anàlisi d’efectes. Al contrari, en els assumptes d’abús en què la conducta de l’operador dominant ha cercat aprofundir la distorsió de la competència derivada de la regulació, anant més enllà dels límits de la mateixa (AstraZeneca i Servier), s’ha utilitzat la lògica de les infraccions per objecte. L’encert d’aquesta aproximació de cara a assumptes futurs dependrà, com a mínim en part, de que les restriccions per objecte siguin únicament aquelles en què no existeixi una explicació legítima plausible per a la conducta de l’operador dominant més enllà de la seva intenció d’eliminar la competència. Inclús en aquests casos, serà necessari, a més a més, que l’operador dominant pugui desvirtuar aquesta determinació prima facie de l’existència d’un abús objectiu. Des d’aquesta perspectiva, l’aplicació de l’article 102 TFUE es limitaria als assumptes en què la regulació sectorial o els DPI no permetin corregir les situacions en què el sistema de patents s’utilitza per a una finalitat diferent de la prevista pel legislador. En d’altres paraules, la casuística i la jurisprudència existents a data d’avui evidencien una clara opció de les institucions i tribunals comunitaris per utilitzar el Dret de la Competència i, en particular, l’article 102 TFUE com a mecanisme corrector de les deficiències d’un sistema de patents no harmonitzat, fragmentari i dispers i d’una regulació sectorial encara parcialment nacional.
The pharmaceutical sector is one of the industrial sectors in which the tension between Competition Law and Intellectual Property Law becomes most apparent. The objectives of both sets of regulation are in opposition by their very nature and, nevertheless, they are both socially desirable. The application of Article 102 TFEU to the pharmaceutical sector evidences that tension and, despite copious doctrinal debate, the boundaries between both regulatory regimes are still unclear. In this PhD, we explore those boundaries in perspective because almost a decade has elapsed since the publication of the European Commission’s inquiry into the pharmaceutical sector. During this decade only a few cases have been analysed and some of them are still under judicial review. Despite the scarcity, these cases allow for some opinions on convergence lines among the different types of abuse in this sector and for a systematic approach to the application of Article 102 TFUE to this sector. Abuse cases in which the dominant undertaking sought to benefit from a disperse sectoral regulation without exceeding the limits of that regulation (Glaxo Greece case and possibly in a near future also Aspen case), but acting against the objectives of the internal market, require an effects analysis. Conversely, abuse cases in which the dominant undertaking sought to deepen the regulatory distortion of competition exceeding the limits of that regulation (AstraZeneca and Servier), a by-object infringement was deemed to exist. The wisdom of this approach in the prospect of future cases will depend, at least in part, on the limitation of by-object infringements to such behaviour for which there is no other plausible explanation than the intention to eliminate competitors. Even in the latter cases, the dominant undertaking must have the possibility to rebut this prima facie presumption of the existence of a by-object restriction. From this perspective, the application of Article 102 TFEU would be limited to those cases in which the sectoral regulation or the Intellectual Property legislation prove inadequate to overcome situations of regulatory misuse for an objective different from that of the legislator. In other words, so far precedents and case-law in the pharmaceutical sector evidence a clear choice from EU institutions and courts consisting of the use of Competition Law and, in particular, Article 102 TFEU as a correction mechanism against regulatory imperfections deriving from a non-harmonized and fragmented patent system and from a sectoral regulation that remains partially national.
Davis, Owen B. "Antitrust punishments in experimental duopoly markets." Laramie, Wyo. : University of Wyoming, 2008. http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=1654492701&sid=1&Fmt=2&clientId=18949&RQT=309&VName=PQD.
Full textAlen, Balde. "Private antitrust law enforcement in cases with international elements." Thesis, University of Glasgow, 2016. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/7060/.
Full textBooks on the topic "Section of Antitrust Law"
American Bar Association. Section of Antitrust Law. American Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law handbook. [Chicago?: The Section, 1994.
Find full textS, Boast Molly, Horning Mark F. 1946-, Langsdorf Roger W, Altschuler Stuart 1954-, and American Bar Association. Section of Antitrust Law. Insurance Industry Committee., eds. The Insurance antitrust handbook: A project of the Insurance Industry Committee, Section of Antitrust Law. Chicago, Ill: The Section, American Bar Association, 1995.
Find full textW, Davis Ronald, Carr Ronald G, American Bar Association. Section of Antitrust Law., and Private Merger Litigation Task Force., eds. Private litigation under section 7 of the Clayton Act: Law and policy. [Chicago, IL]: American Bar Association, Section of Antitrust Law, 1989.
Find full textJohnson, Cheryl Lee. California state antitrust and unfair competition law: The State Bar of California antitrust and unfair competition law section. Edited by State Bar of California. Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Section. New Providence, NJ: LexisNexis Matthew Bender, 2009.
Find full textAmerican Society of Corporate Secretaries., ed. Interlocking directors: Federal Trade Commission enforcement of section 8 of the Clayton Act and section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. New York, N.Y. (1270 Ave. of the Americas, New York 10020): American Society of Corporate Secretaries, 1995.
Find full textAmerican Society of Corporate Secretaries., ed. Interlocking directors: Federal Trade Commission enforcement of section 8 of the Clayton Act and section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. New York, N.Y. (1270 Ave. of the Americas, New York 10020): American Society of Corporate Secretaries, 1990.
Find full textAmerican Bar Association. Section of Antitrust Law. Committee on Civil Practice and Procedure., ed. Antitrust evidence handbook / [prepared by the Civil Practice and Procedure Committee of the Antitrust Section of the American Bar Association]. 2nd ed. Chicago, Ill: American Bar Association, Section of Antitrust Law, 2002.
Find full textCanadian Bar Association. Competition Law Section. Conference. Competition law for the 21st century: Papers of the Canadian Bar Association Competition Law Section 1997 annual conference. Edited by Musgrove James B. Yonkers, NY: Juris Pub., 1998.
Find full textV, Hartwell Ray, Mugel Christopher J, Allen Joseph J, and American Bar Association. Section of Antitrust Law. Criminal Practice and Procedure Committee., eds. Handbook on antitrust grand jury investigations: A project of the Criminal Practice and Procedure Committee of the Antitrust Section of the American Bar Association. 2nd ed. [Chicago]: American Bar Association, 1988.
Find full textKovacic, William E. The antitrust government contracts handbook: A project of the Sherman Act Section 1 Committee. [Chicago]: Section of Antitrust Law, American Bar Association, 1990.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Section of Antitrust Law"
Gilbert, Scott. "Antitrust Law." In Multi-Market Antitrust Economics, 3–13. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69386-6_1.
Full textSteren, E. John. "Antitrust Law." In Laws of Medicine, 327–47. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08162-0_22.
Full textHeinemann, Andreas. "Behavioural Antitrust." In European Perspectives on Behavioural Law and Economics, 211–42. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11635-8_11.
Full textPortuese, Aurelien. "Antitrust Populism: Theory." In Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, 1–7. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_770-1.
Full textPortuese, Aurelien. "Antitrust Populism: Practice." In Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, 1–7. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_771-1.
Full textGilbert, Richard, and Oliver Williamson. "Antitrust Policy." In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, 82–88. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_19.
Full textWiemer, Frederik. "Sports and Antitrust Law." In Management for Professionals, 43–61. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56495-7_3.
Full textTremblay, Victor J., and Carol Horton Tremblay. "Antitrust Law and Regulation." In Springer Texts in Business and Economics, 587–646. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3241-8_20.
Full textKirch, Pierre. "The Technology Innovation Time Gap in Competition Law Enforcement: Assessing the European Commission’s Approach." In Algorithmic Antitrust, 155–74. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85859-9_7.
Full text"Development of Section 1 Doctrine." In Antitrust Law, 90–112. Cambridge University Press, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511610158.006.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Section of Antitrust Law"
Ying, Chenlin. "Concept Reconstruction and Guarantee Standard of Antitrust Law in Professional Sports." In 3rd International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities (ICCESSH 2018). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/iccessh-18.2018.306.
Full textJiang, Nan, and Taolue Zhang. "Study on antitrust law risk evaluation of patent pool based on GRAM." In 2012 9th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM 2012). IEEE, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icsssm.2012.6252264.
Full textDekhtiar, Ivan N. "Urgent Issues Of Antitrust Regulations In Pharmaceutical Industry In Pandemic." In International Scientific and Practical Conference «State and Law in the Context of Modern Challenges. European Publisher, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2022.01.26.
Full textLiuhong, Chen. "Regulation of Antitrust Law on Information Concentration of Platform Economy Users under Flexible Semantic Similarity." In 2023 World Conference on Communication & Computing (WCONF). IEEE, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/wconf58270.2023.10235051.
Full textŠokinjov, Stefan. "DENIAL OF ACCESS TO RESOURCES INDISPENSABLE FOR PROVISION OF SERVICES." In International scientific conference challenges and open issues of service law. Vol. 2. University of Kragujevac, Faculty of law, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.46793/xxmajsko2.549s.
Full textŠokinjov, Stefan. "IZUZIMANjE UGOVORA O ISTRAŽIVANjU I RAZVOJU OD PRAVNOG DEJSTVA KARTELNE ZABRANE." In XVII majsko savetovanje. Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Kragujvcu, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.46793/uvp21.115s.
Full textHulicki, Maciej. "ALGORITHM TRANSPARENCY AS A SINE QUA NON PREREQUISITE FOR A SUSTAINABLE COMPETITION IN A DIGITAL MARKET?" In International Jean Monnet Module Conference of EU and Comparative Competition Law Issues "Competition Law (in Pandemic Times): Challenges and Reforms. Faculty of Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.25234/eclic/18823.
Full text"SECTION 7: Cyber Security and IT Law." In 2020 10th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT). IEEE, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/acit49673.2020.9209007.
Full textShi, Zijing, Qihui Liu, Linlin Wu, and Man Xu. "Static Voltage Stability Limit Law of Typical Coupling Section." In 2023 3rd International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Control Science (IC2ECS). IEEE, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ic2ecs60824.2023.10493604.
Full textRystemaj, Jonida, and Eniana Qarri. "THE RESPONSE OF THE ALBANIAN COMPETITION AUTHORITY TO THE COVID-19 CRISIS." In International Jean Monnet Module Conference of EU and Comparative Competition Law Issues "Competition Law (in Pandemic Times): Challenges and Reforms. Faculty of Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.25234/eclic/18825.
Full textReports on the topic "Section of Antitrust Law"
Maurer, Stephen, and Suzanne Scotchmer. Profit Neutrality in Licensing: The Boundary between Antitrust Law and Patent Law. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, June 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w10546.
Full textDymond, Francis. DOD Contractor Collaborations: Proposed Procedures for Integrating Antitrust Law, Procurement Law, and Purchasing Decisions. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, April 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada440814.
Full textGlick, Mark, Gabriel A. Lozada, and Darren Bush. Why Economists Should Support Populist Antitrust Goals. Institute for New Economic Thinking Working Paper Series, December 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.36687/inetwp195.
Full textDean, Olivia, and Jane Sung. Section 1332 State Innovation Waivers: Understanding Federal Law and Guidance. AARP Public Policy Institute, September 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.26419/ppi.00081.001.
Full textCunha e Melo, Mariana, and Jonas de Abreu Castro. Section 230 and the future of the internet. Center for Technology and Public Interest, SL, March 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.59262/ejp3ba.
Full textGreene, N. M., J. W. Arwood, R. Q. Wright, and C. V. Parks. The LAW Library -- A multigroup cross-section library for use in radioactive waste analysis calculations. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), August 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/10176111.
Full textGlick, Mark, Gabriel A. Lozada, Pavitra Govindan, and Darren Bush. The Horizontal Merger Efficiency Fallacy. Institute for New Economic Thinking Working Paper Series, August 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.36687/inetwp212.
Full textKlosek, Katherine. Issue Brief: Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act: Research Library Perspectives. Association of Research Libraries, July 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.29242/brief.section230cda2021.
Full textEastman, Brittany. Facial Recognition Software and Privacy Law in Transportation Technology. 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA, United States: SAE International, May 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.4271/epr2024011.
Full textBrown, David. Analysis of the Deployed Military Health Information System and Its Ability to Satisfy Requirements of Public Law 105-85, Section 765. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, May 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada444076.
Full text