Relevant bibliographies by topics / Scoping review protocol

Academic literature on the topic 'Scoping review protocol'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 10 December 2022
Last updated: 28 January 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Contents

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Scoping review protocol.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Scoping review protocol"

1

Colquhoun, Heather L., Tiago S. Jesus, Kelly K. O’Brien, Andrea C. Tricco, Adora Chui, Wasifa Zarin, Erin Lillie, Sander L. Hitzig, and Sharon Straus. "Study protocol for a scoping review on rehabilitation scoping reviews." Clinical Rehabilitation 31, no. 9 (January 25, 2017): 1249–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215516688514.

Full text
Abstract:
Introduction: Scoping reviews are increasingly popular in rehabilitation. However, significant variability in scoping review conduct and reporting currently exists, limiting potential for the methodology to advance rehabilitation research, practice and policy. Our aim is to conduct a scoping review of rehabilitation scoping reviews in order to examine the current volume, yearly distribution, proportion, scope and methodological practices involved in the conduct of scoping reviews in rehabilitation. Key areas of methodological improvement will be described. Methods and analysis: We will undertake the review using the Arksey and O’Malley scoping review methodology. Our search will involve two phases. The first will combine a previously conducted scoping review of scoping reviews (not distinct to rehabilitation, with data current to July 2014) together with a rehabilitation keyword search in PubMed. Articles found in the first phase search will undergo a full text review. The second phase will include an update of the previously conducted scoping review of scoping reviews (July 2014 to current). This update will include the search of nine electronic databases, followed by title and abstract screening as well as a full text review. All screening and extraction will be performed independently by two authors. Articles will be included if they are scoping reviews within the field of rehabilitation. A consultation exercise with key targets will inform plans to improve rehabilitation scoping reviews. Ethics and dissemination: Ethics will be required for the consultation phase of our scoping review. Dissemination will include peer-reviewed publication and conferences in rehabilitation-specific contexts.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Rosca, Elena Cecilia, Raluca Tudor, Amalia Cornea, and Mihaela Simu. "Parkinson’s Disease in Romania: A Scoping Review Protocol." Brain Sciences 11, no. 2 (February 17, 2021): 251. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11020251.

Full text
Abstract:
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a significant cause of disability, with a fast-growing prevalence. This review will summarize the epidemiological and clinical data in Romania and the interventions and diagnostic approaches used in this Eastern European country. This scoping review will primarily follow the recommendations on the scoping review methodology made by the Joanna Briggs Institute. In order to answer our research questions, we will search four databases using appropriate search terms. We will use pre-defined inclusion criteria and the data of eligible studies will be extracted in a standardized form. Results will be reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The proposed scoping review will map the evidence on PD in Romania through a literature review, focusing on epidemiology, clinical characteristics, interventions, and diagnosis, contributing to PD research advancement. We will provide information for policy-makers, public health specialists, and clinicians.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Oliveira Ascef, Bruna, Gustavo Laine Araújo de Oliveira, Carmelita Ribeiro Filha Coriolano, and Haliton Alves De Oliveira Junior. "Forecasting models for leprosy cases: a scoping review protocol." BMJ Open 12, no. 7 (July 2022): e062828. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062828.

Full text
Abstract:
IntroductionLeprosy is a neglected tropical disease caused by Mycobacterium leprae that mainly affects the skin, the peripheral nerves, the mucosa of the upper respiratory tract and the eyes. Mathematical models and statistical methodologies could play an important role in decision-making and help maintain the gains in elimination programmes. Various models for predicting leprosy cases have been reported in the literature, but they have different settings and distinct approaches to predicting the cases. This study describes the protocol for a scoping review to identify and synthesise information from studies using models to forecast leprosy cases.Methods and analysisA scoping review methodology will be applied following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and will be reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews. We will perform a systematic search from when each database started until April 2022 and we will include the following electronic databases: MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Literature Database. Data will be extracted and recorded on a calibrated predefined data form and will be presented in a tabular form accompanied by a descriptive summary. The Prediction Model Study Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) will be used.Ethics and disseminationNo ethical approval is required for this study. This scoping review will identify and map the methodological and other characteristics of modelling studies predicting leprosy cases. We hope that the review will contribute to scientific knowledge in this area and act as a basis for researchers designing and conducting leprosy models. This information can also be used to enhance national surveillance systems and to target specific policies. The protocol and consequent publications of this scoping review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and policy briefs.Systematic review registrationThis scoping review was registered in the Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/W9375).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Ahmad Anwar Bashah, Farahnaz, Ahmad Nazlim Yusoff, Nor Alaudin Abdul Wahab, and Susan Armijo-Olivo. "Noise and Cognitive Performance in Developing Brain using Functional MRI: A scoping review protocol." Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal 7, no. 19 (March 31, 2022): 133–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v7i19.3256.

Full text
Abstract:
This protocol aims to guide the process to conduct a scoping review on noise and cognitive performance in developing the brain using functional MRI. This review benefits future research by providing a clear mapping of evidence. This protocol adhered to Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review methodological framework. A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) was implemented to report the full scoping review. This protocol facilitated a well-structured mapping of evidence. The findings from scoping review will be made public through conferences and journal publications. Keywords: Scoping review protocol; Adolescents’ cognitive performance; Noise; functional MRI. eISSN: 2398-4287 © 2022. The Authors. Published for AMER ABRA cE-Bs by e-International Publishing House, Ltd., UK. This is an open access article under the CC BYNC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer–review under responsibility of AMER (Association of Malaysian Environment-Behaviour Researchers), ABRA (Association of Behavioural Researchers on Asians/Africans/Arabians) and cE-Bs (Centre for Environment-Behaviour Studies), Faculty of Architecture, Planning & Surveying, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v7i19.3256
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Coast, Ernestina, Samantha R. Lattof, Yana van der Meulen Rodgers, and Brittany Moore. "Economics of abortion: a scoping review protocol." BMJ Open 9, no. 7 (July 2019): e029939. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029939.

Full text
Abstract:
IntroductionAbortion is a common feature of people’s reproductive lives. However, the economic implications of abortion and policies affecting abortion provision are poorly understood. This scoping review aims to systematically review social science literature for studies that have investigated the impact of abortion care (ie, un/safe abortion, post-abortion care) or abortion policies on economic outcomes at the micro-levels (ie, abortion seekers and their households), meso-levels (ie, communities and health systems) and macro-levels (ie, societies and nation states). Informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline for protocols, this protocol details the scoping review’s methodological and analytical approaches.Methods and analysisThis scoping review will utilise the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) tool. Studies reporting on qualitative and/or quantitative data from any world region will be considered. For inclusion, studies must examine one of the following economic outcomes at the micro-levels, meso-levels and/or macro-levels: costs, benefits, impacts and/or value of abortion care or abortion policies. Searches will be conducted in eight electronic databases. We will conduct the searches and application of inclusion/exclusion criteria according to the PRISMA-ScR flow approach. No assessments of items’ quality will be made, as the purpose of this scoping review is to synthesise and describe the coverage of the evidence. After extracting all data, we will inductively develop an economic framework around the economics of abortion. The analysis will synthesise the evidence base and identify knowledge gaps on the costs and benefits of abortion to stakeholders at various levels.Ethics and disseminationFormal ethical approval is not required, as primary data will not be collected in this study. The findings of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, and condensed summaries for key stakeholders and partners in the field.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Fu, Liang, Minling Zhuang, Chengcan Luo, Ruiyun Zhu, Bei Wu, Wenxia Xu, Bo Xu, Ruiyan Xu, and Xianghong Ye. "Financial toxicity in patients with lung cancer: a scoping review protocol." BMJ Open 12, no. 5 (May 2022): e057801. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057801.

Full text
Abstract:
IntroductionLung cancer has the second-ranked morbidity rate and the first-ranked mortality rate worldwide. With the progression of the cancer condition and the advancement of new treatments, the corresponding medical expenses have risen sharply. Nowadays, financial toxicity has become one of the most common concerns in patients with cancer. However, by far, the full landscape of studies on financial toxicity is unclear in patients with lung cancer. Thus, this scoping review aims to summarise the degree, affecting factors, outcomes and intervention strategies of financial toxicity in patients with lung cancer.Methods and analysisThis scoping review will be developed following the methodology described in the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis on scoping review protocol, which was based on Arksey and O’Malley’s methodological framework, Levac et al’s recommendations for applying this framework and Peters et al’s enhancements of the framework. From the day of database building to 31 December 2021, 10 English databases will be searched in the ‘Abstract’ field with three key search terms: “Lung”, “Cancer” and “Financial toxicity”. The studies’ screening and data extraction will be independently performed by two reviewers (MZ and RZ). Any disagreements between the two reviewers (MZ and RZ) will be resolved by consensus, and a third reviewer (BW) will be invited if necessary. The results will be analysed and presented using tables and figures. This scoping review will be reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist.Ethics and disseminationAn ethical approval is not required for this scoping review protocol, nor for the scoping review. The results of this scoping review will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal or presentation at conferences.RegistrationThis scoping review protocol has been registered in the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/ub45n/?view_only=bb93eb94e1434a0f8196b3b61cffcec2).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Song, Mi Ok, So Young Yun, and Aeri Jang. "Patient safety error reporting program for future undergraduate nursing education: A scoping review protocol." PLOS ONE 17, no. 8 (August 31, 2022): e0273737. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273737.

Full text
Abstract:
Patient safety error reporting education is instrumental in promoting a culture of safety where health-care providers learn from errors and prevent such problems from being repeated. The proposed scoping review aims to establish a comprehensive understanding of how patient error reporting education has been implemented in undergraduate nursing education and present a direction for developing a future patient safety reporting program. The proposed scoping review protocol will be conducted using the Arksey and O’Malley methodological framework, following the Joanna Briggs Institute’s methodology for scoping reviews. It will be reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols (PRISMA-P), and a full scoping review will be reported according to PRISMA extension for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR). In the scoping review, studies published in any language and where the participants were undergraduate nursing students were included. In addition, the search period will not be limited, and the following databases will be used to search for relevant studies: MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Excerpta Medica databases (EMBASE). Moreover, this scoping review does not include unpublished studies or gray literature. Two reviewers will independently review titles and abstracts to evaluate inclusion and exclusion criteria, and primary literature will be selected. Two reviewers will independently assess the full text of selected primary literature in detail against the study criteria.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Hussein, Mohamed Toufic El, Marg Olfert, and Jonah Hakkola. "Clinical judgment conceptualization scoping review protocol." Teaching and Learning in Nursing 17, no. 1 (January 2022): 84–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2021.10.003.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Fu, Liang, Lin Chen, Rufang Li, Wenxia Xu, Jianfei Fu, and Xianghong Ye. "Metabolomics studies on cachexia in patients with cancer: a scoping review protocol." BMJ Open 12, no. 4 (April 2022): e052125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052125.

Full text
Abstract:
IntroductionCancer seriously threatens human health worldwide. Cancer cachexia is one of the life-threatening consequences that occurs commonly in patients with cancer, and severely worsens patient survival, prognosis and quality of life. Previous studies have demonstrated that cancer cachexia is closely related to differential metabolites and metabolic pathways based on metabolomics analysis. This scoping review protocol, therefore, aims to provide the strategy for a formal scoping review that will summarise the differential metabolites and related metabolic pathways of cachexia in patients with cancer.Methods and analysisThe proposed scoping review will follow the Arksey and O’Malley’s methodological framework, Levac et al’s recommendations for applying this framework, and Peters’ enhancements of the framework. The key information from the selected studies will be extracted, including author, year of publication, cachexia definition, country/origin, study design, setting, population and sample size, biological specimens, independent variables, independent variables’ measure and statistical analysis. A summary of metabolites will be divided into several sections depending on the biological specimen. Differential metabolites will be compared between paired groups, and the number and names of related metabolic pathways will be counted and described. The reporting of this scoping review will be in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. This is a scoping review protocol and describes the planned review process and provides data examples extracted from a pilot study to confirm the feasibility of further investigation of the subject.Ethics and disseminationAn ethical approval is not required for this scoping review protocol, nor for the scoping review. The results of this scoping review will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal, or presentation at a national or international conference.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Teo, Kelly, Ryan Churchill, Indira Riadi, Lucy Kervin, and Theodore Cosco. "Help-seeking behaviours among older adults: a scoping review protocol." BMJ Open 11, no. 2 (February 2021): e043554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043554.

Full text
Abstract:
IntroductionDespite evidence that illustrates the unmet healthcare needs of older adults, there is limited research examining their help-seeking behaviour, of which direct intervention can improve patient outcomes. Research in this area conducted with a focus on ethnic minority older adults is also needed, as their help-seeking behaviours may be influenced by various cultural factors. This scoping review aims to explore the global literature on the factors associated with help-seeking behaviours of older adults and how cultural values and backgrounds may impact ethnic minority older adults’ help-seeking behaviours in different ways.Methods and analysisThe scoping review process will be guided by the methodology framework of Arksey and O’Malley and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Protocols Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. The following electronic databases will be systematically searched from January 2005 onwards: MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Scopus. Studies of various designs and methodologies consisting of older adults aged 65 years or older, who are exhibiting help-seeking behaviours for the purpose of remedying a physical or mental health challenge, will be considered for inclusion. Two reviewers will screen full texts and chart data. The results of this scoping review will be summarised quantitatively through numerical counts and qualitatively through a narrative synthesis.Ethics and disseminationAs this is a scoping review of published literature, ethics approval is not required. Results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal.DiscussionThis scoping review will synthesise the current literature related to the help-seeking behaviours of older adults and ethnic minority older adults. It will identify current gaps in research and potential ways to move forward in developing or implementing strategies that support the various health needs of the diverse older adult population.RegistrationThis scoping review protocol has been registered with the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/69kmx).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Scoping review protocol"

1

Ribeiro, Jaime, Ellen Synthia Fernandes de Oliveira, Cleoneide Oliveira, Brígida Mónica Faria, and Lucimara Fornari, eds. New trends in qualitative health research: the pandemic aftermath. Ludomedia, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.13.2022.e733.

Full text
Abstract:
With the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have seen new ways of doing things emerge. Various aspects of everyday life have been digitalized. What was once face-to-face, in context, is now done at a distance. For better or worse, healthcare and health research also had repercussions. On the one hand, there were aspects that improved, while others left something to be desired. I will not list them, because they have already been widely debated and it is now important to discuss what brought us to this page. In the particular field of qualitative research in health, also evident in this edition of NTQR, new trends can be observed in the way of researching, collecting data and producing results. We can even say that the successive confinements and constraints in data collection in the field have led us to a more reflexive process, to look more at what others have produced. We have seen, in the different scientific areas, an increase in literature reviews and other ways of collecting data, such as those latent on the internet. But this is not necessarily harmful, on the contrary, it has created opportunities to map and systematise knowledge. Not reinventing the wheel, but noting the "wheels" that exist, what is done, what needs to be done, innovating and finding ways to improve healthcare in its different perspectives. Perhaps due to better accessibility to data and easier logistics, scoping reviews, for example, sprang up, which, based on the qualitative approach, are one of the best ways to establish the state of the art of what we want to know. We have also observed a growth in thinking outside the box, using visual methods to gather information, such as images and even videographic analysis. We live overwhelmed with communications, content created and exchanges of information, by ordinary citizens, service users, professionals, scientists and many other people. A vast amount of unexplored data that has now emerged, perhaps because the imposed brake of our routines has led us to look more reflectively and give it a chance. All this to say that the more sedentary research has not only changed the vision of doing scientifically valid research but has also reinvented processes for obtaining data that are visible, but that were rarely used. Systematizing dispersed knowledge, shortens the time and resources spent and accelerates the acquisition of skills and, as is often said, the practice based on evidence. The evidence exists, perhaps it is not within everyone's reach, so it is no disrespect to gather, systematize, facilitate the interpretation and publish knowledge produced by others. To research from the office in a protocoled and structured way, is to produce knowledge, which should be poured and drunk by those without access and without availability to start investigations from scratch. Sometimes the best knowledge has already been produced, let us guide its discovery!
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Scoping review protocol"

1

Dante, Angelo, Cristina Petrucci, Arja Halkoaho, Nina Smolander, Mari Laaksonen, Essi Huhtinen, Josephine Hegarty, et al. "Genomic Literacy in the Nursing Field: A Scoping Review Protocol." In Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 127–32. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20257-5_13.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Côté, Isabelle M., Peter S. Curtis, Hannah R. Rothstein, and Gavin B. Stewart. "Gathering Data: Searching Literature and Selection Criteria." In Handbook of Meta-analysis in Ecology and Evolution. Princeton University Press, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691137285.003.0004.

Full text
Abstract:
There is an important relationship between how thorough and unbiased the search for relevant data is and the validity of the resulting meta-analysis. Many reviewers fail to uncover citations to documents relevant to their project because of inadequate search tools or strategies. This chapter covers literature searching and information retrieval, as well as the application of study selection (inclusion) criteria. Best practices include carrying out an initial scoping study to assess how much literature is available and whether a systematic review and meta-analysis are possible; developing an explicit search protocol which details exactly how you will go about searching the literature; and outlining clear study selection criteria so that the reasons for inclusion or exclusion of studies are transparent.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Siegfried, Nandi, and Lawrence Mbuagbaw. "Systematic reviews and meta-analysis." In Oxford Textbook of Global Public Health, edited by Roger Detels, Quarraisha Abdool Karim, Fran Baum, Liming Li, and Alastair H. Leyland, 193–206. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198816805.003.0038.

Full text
Abstract:
Systematic reviews play an important role in healthcare decision-making. When conducted correctly, they provide up-to-date, comprehensive, and replicable summaries of evidence. Authors of systematic reviews are expected to develop a protocol that outlines the research question and key methodological features of their review. A comprehensive and exhaustive search should be conducted, followed by screening to capture studies that meet the prespecified inclusion criteria. Once the relevant studies have been identified, data will be extracted, using a dedicated tool that permits the review authors to confirm the eligibility of the study and collect information on its design, risk of bias, and results. Sufficiently similar data may be pooled using meta-analytic techniques or synthesized narratively. A summary of the overall quality of evidence for each outcome is an essential component of a systematic review. The main concerns with systematic reviews are (1) selection bias: systematic exclusion of relevant studies due to publication status or language; (2) indexing bias: failure to identify relevant studies because they are not indexed accurately; and (3) information bias: missing or inaccurate information in the included studies. Other approaches to evidence synthesis include mapping the evidence with scoping reviews; conducting overviews of systematic reviews; using individual patient data; conducting network meta-analyses for multiple comparisons; conducting rapid reviews when evidence is needed urgently; synthesis of diagnostic accuracy data; and synthesis of qualitative data. Systematic reviews often inform clinical guidelines and require careful planning and execution by teams with content and methodological expertise.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Walsh, Emily, and Heather Carnahan. "Cold Water Exposure for Maritime Workers: A Scoping Review." In Ergonomics - New Insights [Working Title]. IntechOpen, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.105631.

Full text
Abstract:
For many of those working in maritime industries, it is very common to be exposed to harsh environments, such as cold water, on a regular basis. We conducted a scoping review on peer reviewed, published papers to summarize the literature on the topic cold water exposure and non-freezing cold water injuries in the maritime industries. First, industry experts were consulted, then a PICO model was created to define the search terms for the review. The initial search produced 690 abstract. Of these abstracts, 14 were considered to be relevant to the review. The scoping review findings illustrated the lack of research that currently exists in relation to cold water exposure in the maritime industries. Within the available, albeit limited, literature, evidence suggests that there are several cold-water injuries that occur in the maritime industries. These include occupational dermatosis, Raynaud’s phenomena, finger blanching, and hand numbness. Performance decrements were also reported. The current gaps include a lack of documentation of minor and non-fatal injuries, the amount of exposure, and training protocols. There is a need to improve cold-water training regulations for those working in the maritime industries and for proper injury documentation, both of which can significantly benefit safety.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

CATARINO, Marta Sofia Inácio, Paulo César Lopes SILVA, Zaida Borges CHAREPE, Cristina Maria Alves MARQUES-VIEIRA, and Helena Maria Guerreiro JOSÉ. "HUMOR COMO INTERVENÇÃO DE SAÚDE EM CRIANÇAS COM DOENÇA CRÓNICA: PROTOCOLO DE SCOPING REVIEW." In PESQUISAS EM TEMAS DE CIÊNCIAS DA SAÚDE. RFB Editora, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.46898/rfb.9786558891239.4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Scoping review protocol"

1

Makri, Agoritsa, and Dimitrios Vlachopoulos. "STUDY PROTOCOL FOR A SCOPING REVIEW OF COLLABORATIVE LEARNING IN ONLINE ENVIRONMENTS." In 12th International Technology, Education and Development Conference. IATED, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/inted.2018.1933.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Moffat, Andrew D., Robin Fowler, Rebecca L. Matz, and Madison Jeffrey. "Is an Effective Team an Equitable Team? Protocol for a Scoping Review." In 2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/fie56618.2022.9962452.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Muniz Braga, Luciene, Michele Nakahara Melo, Cristina Arreguy-Sena, Anabela de Sousa Salgueiro-Oliveira, Paulo Jorge dos Santos Costa, and Pedro Miguel Parreira. "FLUSHING WITH NORMAL SALINE SOLUTION TO PREVENT VENOUS CATHETER PREVENTION: SCOPING REVIEW PROTOCOL." In JBI BRASIL SIIES 2019 – I SIMPóSIO INTERNACIONAL DE IMPLEMENTAçãO DE EVIDêNCIAS EM SAúDE (SIIES). Galoa, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.17648/siies-2019-103776.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Aparecida da Costa Ferreira, Suzana, and Vera lúcia Conceição de Gouveia Santos. "Topical therapy for pain control in malignant fungating wounds: a scoping review protocol." In JBI BRASIL SIIES 2019 – I SIMPóSIO INTERNACIONAL DE IMPLEMENTAçãO DE EVIDêNCIAS EM SAúDE (SIIES). Galoa, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.17648/siies-2019-103789.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Ahad, Md Abdul, Yvonne Parry, and Eileen Willis. "The Prevalence and Impact of the Maltreatment of Child Laborers in Developing Countries: A Scoping Review Protocol." In The Asian Conference on Education 2021. The International Academic Forum(IAFOR), 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.22492/issn.2186-5892.2022.17.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Sellberg, Charlott, Gesa Praetorius, and Markus Nivala. "Eye-tracking in simulator training and assessment: A semi-structured meta-review." In 13th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2022). AHFE International, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002416.

Full text
Abstract:
The potential for using eye-tracking as quantitative and objective tools for training and assessment has gained substantial attention across domain with high standards for safety [1]. The aim of this study is to synthesize results from previous reviews on eye-tracking support in training and assessment for work in complex socio-technical domains. In particular, the objective is to map out a) how eye-tracking is currently used in training and assessment, and b) the barriers and benefits of using eye-tracking reported in the literature. To answer the research questions, this study is designed as a meta-review, that is, a review of previous reviews or meta-analyses [2]. Since this study takes on broad re-search questions and aims to include different types of methodological contributions from various field to synthesize the state of knowledge between disciplines, a semi-structured review approach is chosen. Semi-structured approaches are suitable for mapping a field of research and synthesize the state of knowledge to set an agenda for future studies [3]. The approach takes on systematic search strategies but often lack the level of scientific rigour of systematic or scoping reviews. What is considered important for the semi-structured review method is a transparent and developed research strategy for the audi-ence to determine the worth and value of the chosen topic, method used and findings from the study [3]. In accordance with best practices, the study design is guided by the PRISMA-protocol for systematic reviews [4]. A search for literature was conducted in February 2021. Advanced search options for discriminating type of articles (reviews) and timespan (2010-2021) were used on three databases: Scopus, Web of Science and Science Direct. Using search words “eye tracking”, “simulator”, “training” and “assessment” when searching through article titles, abstracts and keywords, a total of 403 studies were identified. After removing duplicates, 373 studies were screened. Articles that didn’t meet the inclusion criteria or lacked an explicit focus on eye-tracking support in simulator training and/or assessment were excluded. In all, 20 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. After reading full-text, 12 studies remained and are included in the meta-review. The results show how eye-tracking most commonly is used for 1) summative assessment of technical skills, 2) formative assessment of non-technical skills, 3) identifying differences between novices and experts, and 4) capturing expert gaze patterns. The results show how eye-tracking is appreciated as an unobtrusive technology that enables a quantitative assessment of objective parameters. Hence, the promise of using eye-tracking for informing instructional design as well as for designing training systems and improve learning environments is clear. However, it is important to consider that implementing eye-tracking is a rather expensive and time-consuming endeavour that requires carefully designed tasks and task analyses to fulfil its potential. References1.Rosch, J. L., & Vogel-Walcutt, J. J. A review of eye-tracking applications as tools for training. Cogn. Technol. Work. 15(3), 313–327 (2013)2.Sarrami‐Foroushani, P., Travaglia, J., Debono, D., Clay‐Williams, R., & Braithwaite, J. Scoping meta‐review: introducing a new methodology. Clin. Transl. Sci. 8(1), 77–81 (2015)3.Snyder, H. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. J. Bus. Res, 104, 333–339 (2019)4.Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., ... & Stewart, L. A. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst. Rev. 4(1), 1-9 (2015)
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

McIntosh, Caroline, Jennifer Pallin, Claire Buckley, Patricia Kearney, Sean Dinneen, and Paul Kavanagh. "P51 A scoping review protocol to map the evidence on the risks and benefits of systematic population based diabetic foot screening to prevent diabetic foot related complications." In Society for Social Medicine Annual Scientific Meeting Abstracts. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2022-ssmabstracts.144.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Morgado, Leonel, and Dennis Beck. "Unifying Protocols for Conducting Systematic Scoping Reviews with Application to Immersive Learning Research." In 2020 6th International Conference of the Immersive Learning Research Network (iLRN). IEEE, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.23919/ilrn47897.2020.9155093.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Reports on the topic "Scoping review protocol"

1

Dasí, Virginia Dasí, Emelina López López-González, and Marta Talavera. Defining intimate partner violence: a scoping review protocol. INPLASY - International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, June 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2022.6.0030.

Full text
Abstract:
Review question / Objective: The aim of this scoping review is known what the definition of intimate partner violence is used in the scientific literature. Background: In the scientific literature, intimate partner violence (IPV) has been defined using various terms: aggression, domestic violence, interpersonal violence, intimate partner violence, domestic violence, spousal violence, family violence, etc. (Sprague, 2013; Hamel et al., 2015; O'Hara, 2018, Rahmani et al., 2019). This variety of terminology has hindered a consensus definition, causing a fragmented view of the phenomenon. There are several explanations, one of the main ones being that IPV has been studied by numerous scientific disciplines, each of them associating it with terms specific to its field, focusing on some variables and overshadowing the relevance of others (Nicolás et al. , 2014). Specifically, the term Domestic Violence (DV) and IPV are used interchangeably. However, DV refers to any form of violence perpetrated within a family relationship. It can refer to violence, but also to violence against children or older members of the same family by another family member (Tavoli et al., 2016). It should be noted that the confusion between these terms has been generated since 1993 (Pence & Paymar, 1993) to the present (Bates, 2020).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Huang, Aidan, Qianqian Wang, Qing Meng, Qiwei He, Ruhai Bai, Hairong Dai, Xiyu Zhang, Zhenggang Bai, and Kun Tang. Theorizing Global Health Governance: A Scoping Review Protocol. INPLASY - International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, July 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2022.7.0009.

Full text
Abstract:
Review question / Objective: The review question is: what theories or theoretical frameworks were developed for global health governance? This scoping review aims to (1) assess the extent of existing research articles on global health governance with theories or theoretical framework; (2) summarize their differences and commons in theoretical basis, disciplinary perspectives, methods or methodology, mainly focused stakeholders or actors, and research agenda, etc.; (3) mapping a research roadmap for theorizing global health governance. Background: Given the globalised health issues, health governance in each sovereignty has been closely linked. From the pandemic of SARS to COVID-19, repeating global health crises have alerted the need for global health solidarity efforts. However, there is still a lack of a solid global health governance framework under “international anarchy”.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Morville, Anne-Le, Janice Jones, Michal Avrech-Bar, Teena Clouston, Mona Dür, Nicole Ilper, Anna Röschel, Steve Whitcombe, and Hanne Kristensen. A scoping review protocol on Occupational Science Research in European Contexts. INPLASY - International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, July 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2022.7.0056.

Full text
Abstract:
Review question / Objective: Researchers may conduct scoping reviews instead of systematic reviews where the purpose of thereview is to identify knowledge gaps, scope a body of literature, clarify concepts or to investigate research conduct. While useful in their own right, scoping reviews may also be helpful precursors to systematic reviews and can be used to confirm the relevance of inclusion criteria and potential questions. (Munn et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology (2018) 18:143) The aim of this review is to scope the empirical-based and peer-reviewed European OS research literature and map identified research methods, theories or theoretical concepts, and target groups to obtain a status quo overview of OS research undertaken in Europe between 2015 and 2020. Research questions: • What recent development is seen when mapping the empirical-based and peer-reviewed European OS research literature in accordance with publication volume, publication date and geographical context? • What characterizes the identified research methods, theories or theoretical concepts, and target groups applied in the peer-reviewed OS research literature?
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Capdevila, Lluis, Josep-Maria Losilla, Carla Alfonso, Tony Estrella, and Jaume F. Lalanza. Physical Activity and Planetary Health: a scoping review protocol. INPLASY - International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, June 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2022.6.0028.

Full text
Abstract:
Review question / Objective: The aim of this scoping review is to scope the body of literature, clarify concepts, investigate research conduct and to identify knowledge gaps about the physical activity (PA) behavior in a context of planetary health. The proposed study will review the existing literature considering PA beyond the scope of mere health behaviour, focusing on its potential impacts on planetary health and sustainable development. We will differentiate the PA behavior of the PA facilities or context like green-space or blue-space. Specific objectives are to provide knowledge about: 1. Which PA behaviors are sustainable for the planet and which are not. 2. What are the characteristics of sustainable PA behaviors. 3. What are the positive and negative impacts of PA behaviors on planetary health. Condition being studied: In this case, it is studied how the active lifestyle and the practice of physical activities, exercise or sports of people affect planetary health.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Pearson, Amelia, Rebecca McPhillips, Paul Clarkson, Rosie Allen, and Catherine Robinson. Moral injury in social work staff: A Scoping Review Protocol. INPLASY - International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, October 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2022.10.0050.

Full text
Abstract:
Review question / Objective: The primary objective of this scoping review is to understand the extent and type of evidence in relation to moral injury in social work staff. The secondary objective is to establish how moral injury has been defined in the literature in the context of social work. The review question is: what is currently known about moral injury in social work staff? Background: Moral injury is the lasting psychological, spiritual and social harm caused by committing, experiencing or observing transgressions of deeply held moral values, beliefs and expectations (Haight et al., 2016). The concept of moral injury was developed and subsequently researched with populations of US veterans. Core symptomatic features of moral injury are guilt, shame, spiritual/existential conflict, and a loss of trust in self, others, and/or transcendental ultimate beings (Jinkerson, 2016). Secondary symptomatic features include depression, anxiety, anger, re-experiencing the moral conflict, self-harm, and social problems (Jinkerson, 2016).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Shulhub, Abdullah Bin, Ibrahim Almufarrij, and Kevin J. Munro. Minimal important differences in hearing disorder studies: A scoping review protocol. INPLASY - International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, July 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2021.7.0048.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Ballestas, Natalia, and Gabriela Gomez. Relationship between alopecia areata and intestinal dysbiosis: a scoping review protocol. INPLASY - International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, May 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2022.5.0003.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Wang, Xiao, Yuexue Xiao, Bailey Sujin Nam, Ting Zhong, Dongyan Tang, Ho Cheung William Li, Peige Song, and Wei Xia. Can we utilize Mukbang in health promotion? A scoping review protocol. INPLASY - International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, December 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2022.12.0109.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Woo, Brigitte, Wilson Tam, Jenna Ow, Sum Nok Poon, Yoke Chin Ong, Zu Yu Cheong, and Shawn Y. S. Goh. Characteristics, methodological and reporting quality of scoping reviews published in nursing journals: A systematic review protocol. INPLASY - International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, March 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2022.3.0154.

Full text
Abstract:
Review question / Objective: The proposed review objectives are: i. To examine the characteristics of scoping reviews published in nursing journals; and ii. To evaluate the methodological and reporting quality of the scoping reviews. Eligibility criteria: Articles included in this study will be ScRs published in the nursing journals which indexed in the ISI Journal Citation Reports 2020 Science Edition. Only ScRs in English will be included. Methodology papers, commentaries, conference abstracts, or letters on ScRs will be excluded.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Zhang, Yanji, Wei Huang, Jiajie Wang, Hongjie Xia, and Zhongyu Zhou. Acupuncture for weight loss: Protocol for a scoping review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. INPLASY - International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, March 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2022.3.0098.

Full text
Abstract:
Review question / Objective: The aim of this scoping review is to summarize the evidence from systematic reviews of acupuncture and intervention types for weight loss and to evaluate the breadth and methodological quality of them. Condition being studied: Acupuncture is one of the traditional therapies of Chinese medicine. As its effectiveness and safety, it has been widely used in clinical practice in China. Acupuncture is also used and frequently advocated for the treatment of obesity. A few clinical research, systematic review, or meta-analyses has proved its effectiveness and safety, but there are no comprehensive syntheses among these evidence.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Scoping review protocol' for particular source types:
Journal articles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography