Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Scientific revolutions / Journal articles

Journal articles on the topic 'Scientific revolutions'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Scientific revolutions.

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 1 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Scientific revolutions.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Nikitin, Valeriy. "Scientific revolutions, scientific rationality, scientific traditions." Bulletin of Science and Research Center “Stroitelstvo”, no. 2(29) (2021): 149–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.37538/2224-9494-2021-2(29)-149-155.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

Представленный материал позволяет понять, когда, каким образом и в какой форме происходят научные революции, к каким результатам приводят и какие коренные изменения в миропонимании объективной реальности они вызывают. Научные традиции, наоборот, обеспечивают стабильность и устойчивость развития так называемой «нормальной» науки в рамках той господствующей парадигмы, которая утверждается в результате научной революции.

2

Ruser, Alexander. "The revolutions postponed." Digital Scholar: Philosopher's Lab 3, no. 2 (2020): 59–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/dspl20203217.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

Philosophers of Science have developed sophisti-cated models for explaining how scientific revolu-tions are brought about and more generally how scientists deal with facts that contradict pre-existing assumptions and theoretical concepts. Likewise historians of science and sociologists of knowledge have produced comprehensive studies on how scientific breakthroughs have sparked social revolution and how social factors fostered or hampered scientific developments. However, scientific revolutions and scientific “progress” always seem to be at the center of at-tention. The equally important question of why sometimes new evidence and contradicting evi-dence fail to trigger a scientific revolution has been largely neglected though. Improving our understanding of “called off” or “postponed” rev-olutions not only contributes to analyses of suc-cessful scientific revolutions. Understanding how defenders of the status quo manage to suppress new information and ignore scientific facts is cru-cial to understanding scientific and political con-troversy. This contribution therefore seeks to out-line a conceptual model for probing into the “black box” of scientific revoltions. In addition it will outline a potential framework for analyzing the survival of neoclassic economic theory after the global financial crisis.

3

Shaposhnikov, Vladislav A. "To Outdo Kuhn: on Some Prerequisites for Treating the Computer Revolution as a Revolution in Mathematics." Epistemology & Philosophy of Science 56, no. 3 (2019): 169–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/eps201956357.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

The paper deals with some conceptual trends in the philosophy of science of the 1980‒90s, which being evolved simultaneously with the computer revolution, make room for treating it as a revolution in mathematics. The immense and widespread popularity of Thomas Kuhn’s theory of scientific revolutions had made a demand for overcoming this theory, at least in some aspects, just inevitable. Two of such aspects are brought into focus in this paper. Firstly, it is the shift from theoretical to instrumental revolutions which are sometimes called “Galisonian revolutions” after Peter Galison. Secondly, it is the shift from local (“little”) to global (“big”) scientific revolutions now connected with the name of Ian Hacking; such global, transdisciplinary revolutions are at times called “Hacking-type revolutions”. The computer revolution provides a typical example of both global and instrumental revolutions. That change of accents in the post-Kuhnian perspective on scientific revolutions was closely correlated with the general tendency to treat science as far more pluralistic and transdisciplinary. That tendency is primarily associated with the so-called Stanford School; Peter Galison and Ian Hacking are often seen as its representatives. In particular, that new image of science gave no support to a clear-cut separation of mathematics from other sciences. Moreover, it has formed prerequisites for the recognition of material and technical revolutions in the history of mathematics. Especially, the computer revolution can be considered in the new framework as a revolution in mathematics par excellence.

4

Shults, E. E. "On the classification of revolutions." RUDN Journal of Sociology 19, no. 3 (December 15, 2019): 406–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2019-19-3-406-418.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

The article considers one of the fundamental challenges in the theory of revolution - classification of revolutions. The author analyzes the four most popular features of revolutions that are used to define their types: “revolution from above”, “revolution from below”, “popular revolution” (the marker of the real revolution “from below”), “passive revolution” and “conservative revolution”. All these concepts have a common methodological basis, are closely interrelated in definitions and have the same problems of being used for classifying revolutions. The author examines the principles of introducing these terms and the possibility of their application for classifying revolution by asking two questions: 1) does the classification (and the definition) cover all known social-political revolutions; 2) does the classification (and the definition) allow to consider as revolutions quite different phenomena just similar to revolutions in a number of external features. The main problem of the contemporary discourse is systematization of revolutions according to the above ‘names’ that are accepted as classifying definitions. Moreover, these “new types of revolutions” are added to the existing classifications, which creates confusion, blurs the boundaries of the “revolution”, and allows other social-political phenomena - radical and mass protests, reforms and coups d'état - to be named “revolutions”. The concepts “revolution from above”, “revolution from below”, “popular revolution”, “passive revolution” and “conservative revolution” are socially significant and can be used in everyday discourse, perhaps also in the social-political space (which, however, causes difficulties), but are not scientific terms and cannot be grounds for the scientific classification of revolutions.

5

Kuznetsov, Andrey, Nikolai Zakharov, and Marina Perfiljeva. "Scientific organization of innovative labour." SHS Web of Conferences 116 (2021): 00037. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202111600037.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

The industrial revolutions that have passed so far have been an alternation of “machine revolutions” and “labor organization revolutions”. The third industrial revolution, which created the modern digital communication world, became a prerequisite for the formation of a new organization of work. This new organization is, first of all, the organization of labor of workers involved in the development of a new product, or the organization of innovative labor of workers. The study of the types of innovative labor shows that at least three models need serious improvement, which the authors have assigned the following names: “design” model, “competitive” and “creative”. The scientific organization of innovative labor involves identifying for each model: necessary and sufficient working conditions, including everyday and professional comfort; determination of conditions for the formation of motivational guidelines adequate to their activities among members of collectives engaged in innovative work; developing a clear incentive program based on legal and simple principles of rewarding and punishment.

6

Lugachev, Mihail. "Information Revolutions, Economics and Economic Education." Moscow University Economics Bulletin 2017, no. 4 (August 31, 2017): 142–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.38050/01300105201747.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

The concept of permanent revolution was formulated in the XIX century became a subject of constant debate in humanities circle. In contrast-scientific and technological revolutions are natural components at all steps of human development. Their permanence is commonly recognized imperative, followed by numerous confirmations with a convincing inevitability. Information and industrial revolutions taking place now in the world are such evidences. Experts declare today the fourth industrial revolution. Peter Drucker fairly predicted the fourth information revolution. It is interesting that the most important trait of both revolutions is the artificial intelligence which functions in the sphere of Big Data and Internet of Things. The application field (not the only) is the economy-its structure and content. Experts state the emergence of information capitalism and the information economy — innovations obtaining special and revolutional traits. The article is devoted to analysis of main components of the innovations and offers the ways how they should be reflected in the curriculum for modern economists and managers.

7

Weissmann, Gerald. "Monumental Revolutions: Scientific, Sanitary and ʼOmicMonumental Revolutions: Scientific, Sanitary and ʼOmic." FASEB Journal 23, no. 11 (November 2009): 3639–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fj.09-1101ufm.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Andersen, Hanne. "Characteristics of scientific revolutions." Endeavour 22, no. 1 (January 1998): 3–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0160-9327(98)01093-x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Artenstein, Andrew W., Thomas L. Higgins, and Steven M. Opal. "Sepsis and Scientific Revolutions." Critical Care Medicine 41, no. 12 (December 2013): 2770–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0b013e31829eb98f.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Cavagnini, Kyle. "Descriptions of Scientific Revolutions." Stance: an international undergraduate philosophy journal 5, no. 1 (September 12, 2012): 31–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.33043/s.5.1.31-43.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

The twentieth century saw extended development in the philosophy of science to incorporate contemporary expansions of scientific theory and investigation. Richard Rorty was a prominent and rather controversial thinker who maintained that all progress, from social change to scientific inquiry, was achieved through the redescription of existing vocabularies. However, this theory fails to describe revolutionary scientific progress. Thomas Kuhn’s theories of paradigm change, as first described in his seminal work The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, better portray this process. I attempt to show this by applying Kuhn’s and Rorty’s views to examples of scientific progress and comparing the results.

11

Cavagnini, Kyle. "Descriptions of Scientific Revolutions." Stance: An International Undergraduate Philosophy Journal 5 (2012): 31–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/stance201253.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Lander, Eric S. "Scientific Commentary: The Scientific Foundations and Medical and Social Prospects of the Human Genome Project." Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 26, no. 3 (1998): 184–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720x.1998.tb01418.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

We are living through one of the greatest scientific revolutions in history: the “information revolution” in genetics. The revolution is leading to a deep understanding of biological processes and is uncovering the molecular basis of many human diseases and susceptibilities. It is also confronting society with a vast array of choices, and presenting each individual with the question of what knowledge to seek and how to act on that knowledge, My purpose is to discuss the scientific foundations of this revolution and to foreshadow its consequences.The current scientific revolution has perhaps one appropriate historical precedent: the chemical revolution that followed Dmitri Mendeleev's key insight in 1869 that the elements could be organized in a simple periodic table.

13

Hoskin, Michael. "Book Review: Newton and Scientific Revolutions: The Newtonian Revolution." Journal for the History of Astronomy 17, no. 1 (February 1986): 65–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002182868601700109.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Melnyk, Leonid Hr. "Disruptive Technologies in the Light of Socio-economic Revolutions: the EU and World Experience." Mechanism of an Economic Regulation, no. 3 (2019): 97–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.21272/mer.2019.85.09.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

The relevance of the work explains the need to promote advanced scientific knowledge in the context of accelerating scientific and technological progress. The purpose of the article is to reveal the main content of disruptive technologies and related socio-economic processes that occur during the three industrial revolutions. Based on a retrospective analysis of socio-economic revolutions in human history, the popular scientific essay explains the logic and development of technical and social systems. The article shows how the change of production forces and economic relations influences the ratio of individual components in the essential triad of man: bio-socio-labor. The content of the three industrial revolutions that humanity experiences today is revealed separately (Industry 3.0, Industry 4.0, Industry 5.0). It is explained that the works that launched these revolutions took place in the European countries. In particular, the Third Industrial Revolution is aimed at solving the problems of the global environmental crisis. The key transformation tools are alternative energy, additive technologies based on 3D printers, horizontal network structures of production and consumption. The main direction of the Fourth Industrial Revolution is the creation of a unified network of cyber-physical systems capable of working without humans. One of its leading forms is the Internet of Things. The humanization of socio-economic development is a key objective of the Fifth Industrial Revolution, which is focused on achieving the maximum realization of the creative potential of the human-social basis. The focus is on the key processes of the three industrial revolutions and the changes that take place in the essential triad of man. This article is a popular scientific essay. Key words: industrial revolution, disruptive technology, personality, human-bio, human-socio, human-labor, cyber-physical system.

15

Gernand, Herbert W., and W. Jay Reedy. "Planck, Kuhn, and Scientific Revolutions." Journal of the History of Ideas 47, no. 3 (July 1986): 469. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2709664.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Low, Douglas. "Merleau-Ponty on Scientific Revolutions." Philosophy Today 46, no. 4 (2002): 373–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/philtoday200246424.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Ghiselin, Michael T. "Scientific Revolutions and Punctuated Equilibria." Politics and the Life Sciences 5, no. 2 (February 1987): 228–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s073093840000215x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Enfield, Patrick. "Realism, Empiricism and Scientific Revolutions." Philosophy of Science 58, no. 3 (September 1991): 468–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/289629.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Perovic, Slobodan. "Review Essay: Scientific Revolutions Revisited." Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40, no. 3 (May 18, 2010): 523–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0048393110368377.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Mervart, Jan. "Scientific Revolutions and Political Attitudes." Soudobé dějiny 20, no. 3 (September 1, 2013): 406–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.51134/sod.2013.025.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

HyunDeuk Cheon. "Scientific Revolutions as Ontological Shifts." CHUL HAK SA SANG - Journal of Philosophical Ideas ll, no. 61 (August 2016): 367–405. http://dx.doi.org/10.15750/chss..61.201608.013.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Sankey, Howard. "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions." Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 36, no. 6 (December 2002): 821–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.t01-5-01102a.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Barnett, S. M. "Scientific revolutions, paradoxes and paradigms." Contemporary Physics 41, no. 3 (May 2000): 167–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/001075100181141.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Cañizares-Esguerra, Jorge. "On Ignored Global “Scientific Revolutions”." Journal of Early Modern History 21, no. 5 (October 27, 2017): 420–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15700658-12342573.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

Abstract The categories that structure the study of early modern science are organized around the epistemological liberal regime of facts, objectivity, skepticism, print culture, the public sphere, and the Republic of Letters. The regime of early-modern science in the global Spanish Monarchy is not well known because it was forged in a very different system, one of rewards and legislation in which most activities were transacted through one-on-one epistolary correspondence and intimate transference of information in translation workshops. This global system, nevertheless, engendered ceaseless technical and scientific innovations. I study three cases: the extraction and transformation of silver ores in several spaces; the production of ships and new botanical resources that reorganized global dockyards; and the creation of local translation workshops to facilitate the circulation of knowledge within the global empire. “European” science, the “West,” and instrumental reason have always been global co-creations. However, colonial and postcolonial Manichean dichotomous historiographical categories have made this truism hard to see.

25

Yalow, Rosalyn S. "Peer review and scientific revolutions." Biological Psychiatry 21, no. 1 (January 1986): 1–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-3223(86)90002-8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Bland, Steven. "Schlick, Conventionalism, and Scientific Revolutions." Acta Analytica 27, no. 3 (August 24, 2011): 307–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12136-011-0131-3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Fahrbach, Ludwig. "Scientific revolutions and the explosion of scientific evidence." Synthese 194, no. 12 (September 10, 2016): 5039–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1193-y.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

MacFeely, Steve. "In search of the data revolution: Has the official statistics paradigm shifted?" Statistical Journal of the IAOS 36, no. 4 (November 25, 2020): 1075–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/sji-200662.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

What distinguishes revolution from evolution? What events or movements in the world of official statistics have been sufficiently disruptive or transformational to deserve being called revolutionary? Using the definitions of data revolution put forward by the Independent Expert Advisory Group on a Data Revolution for Sustainable Development in their report A World that Counts to identify potential data revolutions and then deriving a framework to evaluate those definitions from Thomas Kuhn’s work The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, this paper investigates, through the lens of official statistics, whether there has been a data revolution or not.

29

Politi, Vincenzo. "The interdisciplinarity revolution." THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science 34, no. 2 (September 25, 2019): 237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1387/theoria.18864.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

Contemporary interdisciplinary research is often described as bringing some important changes in the structure and aims of the scientific enterprise. Sometimes, it is even characterized as a sort of Kuhnian scientific revolution. In this paper, the analogy between interdisciplinarity and scientific revolutions will be analysed. It will be suggested that the way in which interdisciplinarity is promoted looks similar to how new paradigms were described and defended in some episodes of revolutionary scientific change. However, contrary to what happens during some scientific revolutions, the rhetoric with which interdisciplinarity is promoted does not seem to be accompanied by a strong agreement about what interdisciplinarity actually is. In the end, contemporary interdisciplinarity could be defined as being in a ‘pre-paradigmatic’ phase, with the very talk promoting interdisciplinarity being a possible obstacle to its maturity.

30

Levit, Georgy S., and Uwe Hossfeld. "Evolutionary theories and the philosophy of science." Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies 37, no. 2 (2021): 229–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2021.204.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

Philosophical theories proceeding from the history of physical-mathematical sciences are hardly applicable to the analysis of biosciences and evolutionary theory, in particular. This article briefly reconstructs the history of evolutionary theory beginning with its roots in the 19th century and up to the ultracontemporary concepts. Our objective is to outline the dynamics of Darwinism and anti-Darwinism from the perspective of the philosophy of science. We begin with the arguments of E. Mayr against the applicability of T. Kuhn’s theory of scientific revolutions to the history of biology. Mayr emphasized that Darwin’s publication of the Origin of Species in 1859 caused a genuine scientific revolution in biology, but it was not a Kuhnian revolution. Darwin coined several theories comprising a complex theoretical system. Mayr defined five most crucial of these theories: evolution as such, common descent of all organisms including man, gradualism, the multiplication of species explaining organic diversity, and, finally, the theory of natural selection. Distinguishing these theories is of great significance because their destiny in the history of biology substantially differed. The acceptance of one theory by the majority of the scientific community does not necessarily mean the acceptance of others. Another argument by Mayr proved that Darwin caused two scientific revolutions in biology, which Mayr referred to as the First and Second Darwinian Revolutions. The Second Darwinian Revolution happened already in the 20th century and Mayr himself was its active participant. Both revolutions followed Darwin’s concept of natural selection. The period between these two revolutions can be in no way described as “normal science” in Kuhnian terms. Our reconstruction of the history of evolutionary theory support Mayr’s anti-Kuhnian arguments. Furthermore, we claim that the “evolution of evolutionary theory” can be interpreted in terms of the modified research programmes theory by Imre Lakatos, though not in their “purity”, but rather modified and combined with certain aspects of Marxian-Hegelian dialectics.

31

Andersen (book author), Hanne, Peter Barker (book author), Xiang Chen (book author), and Ryan D. Tweney (review author). "The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Revolutions." Aestimatio: Critical Reviews in the History of Science 3 (December 21, 2015): 153–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.33137/aestimatio.v3i0.25785.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Keith, William, and Kenneth Zagacki. "Rhetoric and paradox in scientific revolutions." Southern Communication Journal 57, no. 3 (September 1992): 165–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10417949209372863.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Moskowitz, Andrew. "Schizophrenia, Trauma, Dissociation, and Scientific Revolutions." Journal of Trauma & Dissociation 12, no. 4 (July 2011): 347–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2011.573770.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Moore, Gordon T. "Two revolutions and the scientific culture." Biochemical Society Transactions 21, no. 2 (May 1, 1993): 387–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/bst0210387.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Koffi, Kan, and Jacqueline Fawcett. "The Two Nursing Disciplinary Scientific Revolutions." Nursing Science Quarterly 29, no. 3 (June 5, 2016): 247–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0894318416648782.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Fuller, Steve. "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962)." Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 36, no. 6 (December 2002): 824–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.t01-5-01102b.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Kindi, Vasso P. "Kuhn'sThe Structure of Scientific Revolutions revisited." Journal for General Philosophy of Science 26, no. 1 (March 1995): 75–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01130927.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Barker, Peter. "The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Revolutions." Erkenntnis 75, no. 3 (November 2011): 445–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10670-011-9333-8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Schipper, Frits. "William Whewell's conception of scientific revolutions." Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 19, no. 1 (March 1988): 43–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0039-3681(88)90019-2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Griffiths, Seren. "We’re All Cultural Historians Now: Revolutions In Understanding Archaeological Theory And Scientific Dating." Radiocarbon 59, no. 5 (July 31, 2017): 1347–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/rdc.2017.20.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

ABSTRACTRadiocarbon dating has had profound implications for archaeological understanding. These have been identified as various “revolutions,” with the latest—Bayesian chronological statistical analyses of large datasets—hailed as a “revolution in understanding.” This paper argues that the full implications of radiocarbon (14C) data and interpretation on archaeological theory have yet to be recognized, and it suggests that responses in Britain to earlier revolutions in archaeological understanding offer salutary lessons for contemporary archaeological practice. This paper draws on the work of David Clarke and Colin Renfrew to emphasize the importance of critical considerations of the relationships between archaeological theory and scientific method, and to emphasize that seemingly neutral aspects of archaeological thought are highly laden interpretatively, and have significant implications for the kinds of archaeology that we write.

41

Allègre, Claude, and Vincent Courtillot. "Revolutions in the earth sciences." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 354, no. 1392 (December 29, 1999): 1915–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1999.0531.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

The 20th century has been a century of scientific revolutions for many disciplines: quantum mechanics in physics, the atomic approach in chemistry, the nonlinear revolution in mathematics, the introduction of statistical physics. The major breakthroughs in these disciplines had all occurred by about 1930. In contrast, the revolutions in the so–called natural sciences, that is in the earth sciences and in biology, waited until the last half of the century. These revolutions were indeed late, but they were no less deep and drastic, and they occurred quite suddenly. Actually, one can say that not one but three revolutions occurred in the earth sciences: in plate tectonics, planetology and the environment. They occurred essentially independently from each other, but as time passed, their effects developed, amplified and started interacting. These effects continue strongly to this day.

42

Elena, Alberto. "The Imaginary Lyellian Revolution." Earth Sciences History 7, no. 2 (January 1, 1988): 126–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.17704/eshi.7.2.c4345g96l0m5mq67.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

Historians and philosophers of science have usually followed Kuhn in his appraisal of Lyell's contribution to geology as a major scientific revolution. Nevertheless a detailed analysis of the historical evidence rather support a different view: Lyell's work did not establish any paradigm to be unanimously accepted by his colleagues. Thus Kuhn's model of scientific change does not authorize us to speak of a Lyellian revolution in geology. On the contrary such an interpretation is a recent historiographic myth, originated with Gillispie's Genesis and Geology and promptly prevailing as a result of Kuhn's highly influential The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.

43

Westman, Robert S. "Essay Review: Cognizing the Copernican Revolution, the Cognitive Structure of Scientific Revolutions." Journal for the History of Astronomy 40, no. 3 (August 2009): 339–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002182860904000306.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Beuren, Ilse Maria, and José Carlos de Souza. "Kuhn’s theory of scientific revolutions in accounting articles." Corporate Ownership and Control 8, no. 2 (2011): 77–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv8i2p7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Abstract:

The aim of the article is to verify the insertion of Kuhn’s Theory of Scientific Revolutions in articles in the accounting area. The focus of the analysis is the possibility of inserting and using the Kuhn’s ideas in theoretical and empirical research on Accounting Science. Documental analysis was done on articles published in journals of the accounting area that make reference to Kuhn’s Theory of Scientific Revolutions and that are available at CAPES Journals Portal. Sixty-two articles with at least one reference to Kuhn’s work were found in fifty-six journals, concentrated in seventeen journals. Kuhn’s Theory of Scientific Revolutions is present in scientific articles in the accounting area and authors in this area appropriate related ideas to base their researches on.

45

Kivirauma *, Joel. "Scientific revolutions in special education in Finland." European Journal of Special Needs Education 19, no. 2 (June 2004): 123–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08856250410001678450.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Kaiser, David. "In retrospect: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions." Nature 484, no. 7393 (April 2012): 164–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/484164a.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

McBride, Jacob William. "Diagnosis and the Structure of Scientific Revolutions." American Journal of Psychiatry Residents' Journal 11, no. 3 (March 2016): 13–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp-rj.2016.110305.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Mayr, Ernst. "The advance of science and scientific revolutions." Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 30, no. 4 (October 1994): 328–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1520-6696(199410)30:4<328::aid-jhbs2300300402>3.0.co;2-0.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Minton, Henry L. "The Making of Sexual and Scientific Revolutions." Contemporary Psychology: A Journal of Reviews 41, no. 10 (October 1996): 975–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/004509.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Elguea, Javier. "Paradigms and Scientific Revolutions in Development Theories." Development and Change 16, no. 2 (April 1985): 213–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1985.tb00208.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles