Academic literature on the topic 'Scientific'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Scientific.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Scientific":
Fioravanti, M., F. Giannetti, S. Spinelli, and M. Marchetti. "Bibliometric analysis of the scientific production in forestry-related scientific fields." Forest@ - Rivista di Selvicoltura ed Ecologia Forestale 15, no. 1 (June 30, 2018): 65–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.3832/efor2861-015.
Nikitin, Valeriy. "Scientific revolutions, scientific rationality, scientific traditions." Bulletin of Science and Research Center “Stroitelstvo”, no. 2(29) (2021): 149–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.37538/2224-9494-2021-2(29)-149-155.
R Abzalova, Shakhnoza, Surat S. Gulyamov, Dilfuza T. Ashurova, and Jahongir B. Husainov. "Scientific Study Procedure." International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation 24, Special Issue 1 (February 28, 2020): 928–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.37200/ijpr/v24sp1/pr201236.
Quoc,, Nguyen Anh, and Lam Ngoc Linh. "The Scientific Essence." International Journal of Social Science And Human Research 05, no. 10 (October 27, 2022): 4711–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i10-40.
Putnam, Hilary. "Scientific Liberty and Scientific Licence." Grazer Philosophische Studien 30 (1987): 43–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/gps1987305.
Pearce, S. C., and I. D. Bross. "Scientific Fraud vs. Scientific Truth." Biometrics 49, no. 3 (September 1993): 958. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2532226.
Shone, Ronald. "Scientific Word and Scientific Workplace." Economic Journal 105, no. 433 (November 1995): 1688. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2235147.
Putnam, Hilary. "SCIENTIFIC LIBERTY AND SCIENTIFIC LICENCE." Grazer Philosophische studien 30, no. 1 (August 13, 1987): 43–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18756735-90000330.
Durrenberger, E. Paul. "Scientific Anthropology:Reclaiming a Scientific Anthropology." Anthropology Humanism 24, no. 1 (June 1999): 86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/ahu.1999.24.1.86.
RELYEA, HAROLD C. "Scientific Freedom and Scientific Responsibility." Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 577, no. 1 Ethical Issue (December 1989): 200–210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1989.tb15066.x.
Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Scientific":
Park, Seungbae. "Scientific realism vs. scientific antirealism." Diss., The University of Arizona, 2001. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/289710.
Jardine, Boris Samuel. "Scientific moderns." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 2012. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.610691.
Kochakian, Nick. "Scientific visualizations /." Online version of thesis, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/1850/10644.
Finney, Colin Michael. "Scientific citizenship : extending public participation in scientific decision making." Thesis, Imperial College London, 1999. http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/8807.
Cheng, Peter C.-H. "Modelling scientific discovery." Thesis, Open University, 1990. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.256257.
Simons, Pino Adrián. "The scientific proof." THĒMIS-Revista de Derecho, 2018. http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/123854.
Los avances científicos han influenciado enormemente la percepción de los hechos, generando cierta objetivación de la percepción de la prueba. En el pasado, muchas decisiones se tomaban sobre la base del sentido común y las presunciones. Ello se ve reducido con la actuación de medios probatorios más certeros y fiables, los cuales pueden generar una mejor convicción en el juez u operador jurídico.En el presente artículo, el autor desarrolla los efectos que ha tenido la prueba científica en los operadores del derecho, como los jueces. Asimismo, se planteará un marco teórico para comprender a dicho tipo de prueba, tomando como referencia casos emblemáticos.
Miller, Fiona Carleton University Dissertation Political Science. "Rousseau's scientific bagatelle." Ottawa, 1994.
Costantini, Mattia <1985>. "International Scientific Cooperation." Master's Degree Thesis, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/10579/4723.
Knight, Amanda Margaret. "Students' abilities to critique scientific evidence when reading and writing scientific arguments." Thesis, Boston College, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:104146.
Scientific arguments are used to persuade others for explanations that make sense of the natural world. Over time, through the accumulation of evidence, one explanation for a scientific phenomenon tends to take precedence. In science education, arguments make students' thinking and reasoning visible while also supporting the development of their conceptual, procedural, and epistemic knowledge. As such, argumentation has become a goal within recent policy documents, including the Next Generation Science Standards, which, in turn, presents a need for comprehensive, effective, and scalable assessments. This dissertation used assessments that measure students' abilities to critique scientific evidence, which is measured in terms of the form of justification and the support of empirical evidence, when reading and writing scientific arguments. Cognitive interviews were then conducted with a subset of the students to explore the criteria they used to critique scientific evidence. Specifically, the research investigated what characteristics of scientific evidence the students preferred, how they critiqued both forms of justification and empirical evidence, and whether the four constructs represented four separate abilities. Findings suggest that students' prioritized the type of empirical evidence to the form of justification, and most often selected relevant-supporting justifications. When writing scientific arguments, most students constructed a justified claim, but struggled to justify their claims with empirical evidence. In comparison, when reading scientific arguments, students had trouble locating a justification when it was not empirical data. Additionally, it was more difficult for students to critique than identify or locate empirical evidence, and it was more difficult for students to identify than locate empirical evidence. Findings from the cognitive interviews suggest that students with more specific criteria tended to have more knowledge of the construct. Lastly, dimensional analyses suggest that these may not be four distinct constructs, which has important implications for curriculum development and instructional practice. Namely, teachers should attend to the critique of scientific evidence separately when reading and writing scientific arguments
Thesis (PhD) — Boston College, 2015
Submitted to: Boston College. Lynch School of Education
Discipline: Teacher Education, Special Education, Curriculum and Instruction
Cutrufello, Gabriel. "Demonstrating Scientific Taste: Aesthetic Judgment, Scientific Ethos, and Nineteenth-Century American Science." Diss., Temple University Libraries, 2012. http://cdm16002.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p245801coll10/id/167729.
Ph.D.
This dissertation explores how aesthetic claims in scientific arguments help construct scientific ethos through demonstrations of the rhetor's judgment. By examining the works of Josiah Willard Gibbs and Henry Rowland, two prominent nineteenth-century American scientists, through the lens of their formal rhetorical training as students in American universities, this dissertation investigates how aesthetic judgment is enacted in scientific writing and explores the rhetorical history of the terms "simplicity," "brevity," "imagination," and "taste" and their use in scientific arguments. The aesthetic judgment that both scientists demonstrate in their written work reinforced an understanding of scientific ethos. By placing nineteenth-century scientific writing in contact with the rhetorical theories of the time, this dissertation explores the history of aesthetic judgment in rhetoric and its influence on conceptualizations of the faculty of taste. The dissertation illuminates the connections between rhetorical training and the ability to perform appropriate judgment when creating a reliable scientific ethos in writing. Constructing a scientific ethos in writing became increasingly important and complicated during the time of great institutional change in scientific research, which occurred during the second half of the nineteenth century in America. Scientists constructed scientific ethos through demonstrations of aesthetic judgment in order to respond to the exigencies of both institutional pressures and disciplinary expectations.
Temple University--Theses
Books on the topic "Scientific":
Blackwell, John. A scientific approach to scientific writing. New York: Springer, 2011.
Blackwell, John, and Jan Martin. A Scientific Approach to Scientific Writing. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9788-3.
Bagby, Susan. Einführung in Scientific WorkPlace, Scientific Word, und Scientific Notebook: Version 4.0. Bainbridge Island, Wa: MacKichan Software Inc., 2001.
Youngson, R. M. Scientific dumbology. London [England]: Magpie Books, 2006.
Hunter, Roger. Getting started with Scientific WorkPlace, Scientific Word, and Scientific Notebook: Version 3.5. Bainbridge Island, Wash: MacKichan Software Inc., 2000.
Bokulich, Alisa, and Peter Joshua Martin Bokulich. Scientific structuralism. Edited by SpringerLink (Online service). New York: Springer Verlag, 2011.
Zoysa, G. H. De. Scientific astrology. Dehiwala, [Sri Lanka]: Siridevi Printers, 2000.
Johnston, Howard Agnew. Scientific faith. Chicago, Ill: Winona Publ. Co., 1985.
International Symposium of Biomechanics in Sports (17th 1999 Perth, W.A.). Scientific proceedings. Edited by Sanders Ross, Gibson Barry J, International Society of Biomechanics in Sports., and Edith Cowan University. Perth, W.A: School of Biomedical and Sports Science, Edith Cowan University, 1999.
Gonnet, G. H. Scientific computation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Book chapters on the topic "Scientific":
McComas, William F. "Scientific Method (Scientific Methodology)." In The Language of Science Education, 93. Rotterdam: SensePublishers, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-497-0_83.
Bährle-Rapp, Marina. "scientific." In Springer Lexikon Kosmetik und Körperpflege, 496. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71095-0_9208.
Torretti, Roberto. "‘Scientific Realism’ and Scientific Practice." In The Reality of the Unobservable, 113–22. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9391-5_6.
Dorato, Mauro, and Laura Felline. "Scientific Explanation and Scientific Structuralism." In Scientific Structuralism, 161–76. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9597-8_9.
Heuss, Theodor. "Scientific Work and Scientific Polemics." In Anton Dohrn, 178–85. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76347-2_23.
Ludäscher, Bertram. "What Makes Scientific Workflows Scientific?" In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 217. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02279-1_16.
Greenwood, John D. "Scientific Empiricism and Scientific Psychology." In Explanation and Experiment in Social Psychological Science, 1–28. New York, NY: Springer New York, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8801-2_1.
Harker, David. "Scientific Progress and Scientific Realism." In New Philosophical Perspectives on Scientific Progress, 275–92. New York: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003165859-18.
Park, Seungbae. "Scientific Realism and Scientific Progress." In Embracing Scientific Realism, 155–76. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87813-9_8.
Park, Seungbae. "Scientific Realism and Scientific Practice." In Embracing Scientific Realism, 201–20. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87813-9_10.
Conference papers on the topic "Scientific":
Bertin, Marc. "Scientific Monitoring by Mining Scientific Papers." In the 6th International Conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2668260.2668306.
Vasconcelos, Clara, Alexandra Cardoso, and Maria Luisa Vasconcelos. "SOCIO-SCIENTIFIC ISSUES AND SCIENTIFIC LITERACY." In 11th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation. IATED, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2018.0034.
"Scientific Committee." In 2019 International Colloquium on Logistics and Supply Chain Management (LOGISTIQUA). IEEE, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/logistiqua.2019.8907251.
"Scientific committee." In 2015 Sixth International Conference of Cognitive Science (ICCS). IEEE, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/cogsci.2015.7426659.
"Scientific committee." In 2016 Fourth International Conference on Millimeter-Wave and Terahertz Technologies (MMWaTT). IEEE, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mmwatt.2016.7869934.
"Scientific committee." In 2012 Second Conference on Millimeter-Wave and Terahertz Technologies (MMWaTT). IEEE, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mmwatt.2012.6532172.
"Scientific committee." In 2014 Third Conference on Millimeter-Wave and Terahertz Technologies (MMWATT). IEEE, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mmwatt.2014.7057215.
"Scientific committee." In 2017 International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing Symposium (IDAP). IEEE, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/idap.2017.8090160.
"Scientific Committee." In 2017 Palestinian International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (PICICT). IEEE, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/picict.2017.36.
"Scientific reviewers." In 2014 17th Oriental Chapter of the International Committee for the Co-ordination and Standardization of Speech Databases and Assessment Techniques (COCOSDA). IEEE, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icsda.2014.7051403.
Reports on the topic "Scientific":
Critchlow, T. J., L. Liu, C. Pu, A. Gupta, B. Ludaescher, I. Altintas, M. Vouk, D. Bitzer, M. Singh, and D. Rosnick. Scientific Data Management Center Scientific Data Integration. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), January 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/15003250.
Noyes, H. Scientific Eschatology. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), March 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/839932.
SARACHIK, MYRIAM P. Scientific/Technical Report. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), July 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1140147.
Finnerty, Caine. Final Scientific Report. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), January 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/923209.
Kahan, W. Scientific Computing Environments. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, August 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada191239.
Zelenay, Piotr, Xi Yin, and Edward F. Holby. w19_OMEC Scientific Highlight. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), April 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1608677.
Pfleger, Brian F. Final Scientific Report. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), September 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1508649.
Evan Abramson. Final Scientific Report. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), June 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/958052.
Khalil, Munira. Final Scientific Report. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), November 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1576203.
Stephan, K. D. Final Scientific Report. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), January 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/875918.