Dissertations / Theses on the topic 'Sacroiliac joint'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 dissertations / theses for your research on the topic 'Sacroiliac joint.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse dissertations / theses on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
Bussey, Melanie D. "Sacroiliac joint dysfunction in female athletes." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1999. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk1/tape9/PQDD_0001/MQ46238.pdf.
Full textBaria, Dinah. "Sacroiliac Joint Biomechanics and Effects of Fusion." Scholarly Repository, 2010. http://scholarlyrepository.miami.edu/oa_dissertations/466.
Full textJoukar, Amin. "Gender Specific Sacroiliac Joint Biomechanics: A Finite Element Study." University of Toledo / OhioLINK, 2017. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=toledo1503595542705189.
Full textLueck, Danielle. "Reliability of sacroiliac joint tests in experienced and inexperienced examiners." Morgantown, W. Va. : [West Virginia University Libraries], 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/10450/10190.
Full textTitle from document title page. Document formatted into pages; contains vii, 94 p. : col. ill. Includes abstract. Includes bibliographical references.
Fernandes, Monica Lente. "Relação do exame físico e ultrassonográfico do segmento lombo-sacro-ilíaco e do disco invertebral da articulação lombossacral com desempenho atlético em equinos." Universidade de São Paulo, 2013. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/10/10136/tde-07072014-145019/.
Full textBack pain affects most athletes, including horses. The clinical examination alone is not sufficient to identify the exact location of the painful focus. The definitive diagnosis is only achieved by using complementary diagnostic tools, in the case of this study the ultrasonography. Lumbosacral anomalies and intertransverse lumbosacral and sacroiliac arthropathies, if detected ultrasonographicaly, do not directly input in loss of performance or locomotor impairment. In order to assess this issue, this study aimed to establish a relationship between the findings of physical and ultrasound examinations, performed on 200 horses athletes, from 4 different breeds, French Trotters, Quarter Horse, Thoroughbred Horses and Show Jumpers. After physical examination, the animals were evaluated by a transrectal approach with ultrasonography and the images collected were, ventral aspect of the disc LS (L6-S1), intertransverse joints (ITLS) and sacroiliac (SI), right and left. To perform this evaluation, the animals were placed in the containment trunk with any sedation methods. Immediately thereafter introduced a 5 - 7.5 MHz linear transducer, images of lumbosacral, intertransverse lombossacral and sacroiliac joints were obtained. The determination of number of animals showing abnormalities during clinical examination of inspection, palpation, mobilization and dynamic examination as well as the characterization of the types of disc anomalies (T1, T2, T3 and T4) and arthropathies ITLS and SI, enabled the realization of the following framework, where even the patient, during the execution of the clinical examination, will not provide a positive signals for certain tests, this does not rule out the possibility it has some kind of anomaly in LS joint and/or arthropathy ITLS and/or SI. It was also observed that the arthropathy of SI can affect the performance of French Trotters, and anomalies of ITLS and LS have no significance or influence on athletic performance.
Levin, Ulla. "Sacroiliac pain-provocation testing in physiotherapy : time and force recording /." Stockholm, 2004. http://diss.kib.ki.se/2004/91-7349-975-7.
Full textMcGrath, Maurice Christopher John, and n/a. "The relationship between the long posterior sacroiliac ligament and the posterior sacrococcygeal plexus." University of Otago. Department of Anatomy & Structural Biology, 2007. http://adt.otago.ac.nz./public/adt-NZDU20070824.142033.
Full textHöch, Andreas, Philipp Pieroh, Faramarz Dehghani, Christoph Josten, and Jörg Böhme. "An atraumatic symphysiolysis with a unilateral injured sacroiliac joint in a patient with Cushing’s disease." Universitätsbibliothek Leipzig, 2016. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:15-qucosa-206079.
Full textIvanov, Alexander. "Development, validation and clinical application of finite element human pelvis model." University of Toledo Health Science Campus / OhioLINK, 2008. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=mco1213734675.
Full textYusof, Nurul Asyiqin. "The development and anatomy of the sacrum in relation to the ilium and the sacroiliac joint." Thesis, University of Dundee, 2013. https://discovery.dundee.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/7fc989e0-e7ca-4b04-81be-fb03e110d70b.
Full textSoisson, Odette, Juliane Lube, Andresa Germano, Karl-Heinz Hammer, Christoph Josten, Freddy Sichting, Dirk Winkler, Thomas L. Milani, and Niels Hammer. "Pelvic belt effects on pelvic morphometry, muscle activity and body balance in patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction." Universitätsbibliothek Leipzig, 2015. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:15-qucosa-167389.
Full textJi, Xiang. "The association of variations in hip and pelvic geometry with pregnancy-related sacroiliac joint pain based on a longitudinal analysis." Kyoto University, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/2433/242658.
Full textJooste, Nicolene. "Validating the accuracy and repeatability of transition analysis for age estimation in South Africa." Diss., University of Pretoria, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/2263/45975.
Full textDissertation (MSc)--University of Pretoria, 2014.
tm2015
Anatomy
MSc
Unrestricted
蕭志常. "骶髂關節錯縫的中醫藥治療研究." HKBU Institutional Repository, 2009. http://repository.hkbu.edu.hk/etd_ra/1022.
Full textTurner, Bruce. "A clinical evaluation of hip joint functional ability after sacroiliac joint manipulation in patients with sacroiliac joint syndrome." Thesis, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/10321/180.
Full textThe differential diagnosis of back and leg pain should include sacroiliac joint disease as the prevalence of sacroiliac joint pain appears to range from 13%-30%, thus making the sacroiliac joint a significant source of pain in patients with chronic low back pain. Sacroiliac syndrome is well-defined and usually presents with pain over the sacroiliac joint in the region of the posterior superior iliac spine, with possible referral to the buttock, groin, and leg. Most patients with sacroiliac syndrome seem to present with spastic or hyperactive muscles which leads to increased pain and decreased range of motion. Because of the close proximity of the Piriformis muscle to the sacroiliac joint, it is likely to be one of these hyperactive muscles. Various studies on low back pain, including a study on sacroiliac syndrome, have shown a correlation between low back pain, hip rotation range of motion asymmetry, and decreased hip mobility. In addition, the muscles responsible for movements of the hip have an overlapping innervation with the hip joint (L2 to S1) and sacroiliac joint (L2 to S3). It is assumed that the hypertonic muscles associated with sacroiliac syndrome decrease hip joint proprioception as the proprioceptors are facilitated erratically in a highly facilitated neuronal pool common to the innervation levels of the sacroiliac joint and the hip and associated with the level of the involved hypertonic muscle. This is thought to result in aberrant proprioceptive function at the identified levels, affecting the hip. Thus the aim of this study was to investigate the effect which sacroiliac joint manipulation had on hip functional ability in patients suffering from sacroiliac syndrome by means of various measurement tools: . Active hip joint ranges of motion were assessed using an Inclinometer, . Pressure threshold of the Piriformis muscle was measured by using an Algometer, and . Hip joint proprioception was assessed by measuring joint position sense of the hip joint using an Inclinometer.
Shen, Chien-Ming, and 沈建銘. "Effectiveness of Additional Sacroiliac Joint Manipulation on Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome Associated with Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction." Thesis, 2016. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/ekw77q.
Full text國立陽明大學
物理治療暨輔助科技學系
104
Background: Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is associated with symptoms around the patellofemoral articulation and can be aggravated by functional weight bearing activities. It is one of the most common musculoskeletal complaints that accounts for approximately 25% of the knee conditions. The etiology of PFPS is commonly regarded as having abnormal patella tracking in the trochlear groove of the femur that causes increased patellofemoral joint stress with excessive compression or tension during activities. Recently, researchers found women with PFPS showed reduce hip strength and abnormal movement patterns of step-down strategy. Because hip joint control is closely related to sacroiliac joint (SIJ) mobility, researchers have used SIJ manipulation for PFPS with treatment effect on increasing knee extensor strength, but whether individuals with PFP and SIJ dysfunction have different musculoskeletal control than health subjects was still not clear, and if SIJ manipulation would be effective on individuals with PFPS associated with SIJ dysfunction. Purpose: 1. To compare difference of lower extremity musculoskeletal control characteristics in those with PFPS and SIJ locking from healthy subjects. 2. To determine effectiveness of SIJ manipulation on individuals with PFPS associated with SIJ dysfunction. Methods: Study 1: Forty individuals with PFPS associated with SIJ posterior rotation hypomobility (PFPS group) and 20 healthy subjects matched by sex, age, and body mass index were recruited. Lower extremity musculoskeletal control characteristics (Ilium anterior tilt angle difference (IATD), lower extremity muscle strength and flexibility, and hip adduction angle change (HAdd) and lower extremity muscle activation level during a step-down test were collected. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to statistically compare differences in lower extremity musculoskeletal control characteristics between the PFPS and healthy groups. Study 2: Subjects in the PFPS group recruited in Study 1 were randomized to either an SIJ manipulation + exercise group (Experimental group, n=20) or an exercise-only group (Control group, n=20) and received physical therapy intervention for 4 weeks. The lower extremity musculoskeletal control characteristics as well as pain, lower extremity function, and self-perceived improvement were measured before and after intervention. Two-way repeated-measure ANOVAs were used to investigate if the experimental group improved more than the control group after intervention, α was set at 0.05. Results: In study 1, PFPS group demonstrated higher IATD (p<0.001), less lower extremity muscle strength (p<0.004) and flexibility (p<0.035), greater HAdd change (p=0.007) and lower extremity muscle activation (p<0.023) during the step-down test as compared to the healthy group. In study 2, additional SIJ manipulation resulted in significantly better improvement in pain reduction (p=0.008), self-perceived improvement (p<0.001), hip abductors strength (p=0.007), calf muscle flexibility (p=0.032) and tensor fascia lata-iliotibial band complex (p=0.005), IATD (p=0.045), HAdd change during the step-down test (p<0.001) as compared to the exercise-only approach after 4-week physical therapy intervention. Conclusion: Individuals with PFPS and SIJ posterior rotation hypomobility showed poorer lower extremity musculoskeletal control as compared to the healthy group. Additional SIJ manipulation was effective in pain reduction and enhancing self-perceived improvement as well as lower extremity musculoskeletal control.
"A comparison of sacroiliac joint manipulation versus piriformis muscle ice-and-stretch combined with sacroiliac joint manipulation on post-partum females suffering from sacroiliac syndrome." Thesis, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/10210/2664.
Full textMarszalek, Norman Maciej. "The effectiveness of manipulation of the symptomatic sacroiliac joint compared to manipulation of both the asymptomatic and symptomatic sacroiliac joints in the treatment of unilateral sacroiliac syndrome." Thesis, 2002. http://hdl.handle.net/10321/1911.
Full textLow back pain (LBP) is a significant public health problem that has had a marked impact on quality of life and on health care costs (Weiner, et al. 2000:450). Toussaint, et al. (1999:134) established that the prevalence of sacroiliac joint dysfunction in the population has been noted in the medical literature to be between 19.3% and 47.9%. There is a lack of consensus among medical practitioners, chiropractors, osteopaths, physiotherapists and others as to the most appropriate therapy or management for sacroiliac syndrome. This study was designed to determine the effectiveness of manipulation of the symptomatic sacroiliac joint compared to manipulation of both the symptomatic and the asymptomatic sacroiliac joints in the treatment of unilateral sacroiliac syndrome. Anecdotal evidence would seem to indicate that the direction of the chiropractic manipulation is immaterial to clinical improvement (Till, 1994). Bilateral manipulation of the symptomatic and asymptomatic joints has been used in clinical practice in an attempt to increase the efficacy of chiropractic management for unilateral sacroiliac joint syndrome (Till, 1994, Lewis, 2001 and Nook, 2000). Walker (1992:914) was of the opinion that 'Unless reliability and validity of assessments and effectiveness of treatment procedures can be demonstrated, clinicians should temper their claims of measurement of, and direct effects on, the sacroiliac joint.' This randomized, comparative clinical trial consisted of sixty voluntary subjects each suffering from sacroiliac joint syndrome. There were two groups of thirty subjects, each of whom received five treatments within a three week period. Group one received manipulation of the symptomatic sacroiliac joint
M
Peace, Shane. "Sacroiliac joint assessment within the Australian osteopathic profession." Thesis, 2003. https://vuir.vu.edu.au/928/.
Full textPeace, Shane. "Sacroiliac joint assessment within the Australian osteopathic profession." 2003. http://eprints.vu.edu.au/928/1/Peace_et.al_2003.pdf.
Full textSawyer, Angela Hope. "The relative effectiveness of manipulation used in conjunction with a non-stabilising sacroiliac orthotic versus manipulation used in conjunction with a stabilising sacroiliac orthotic in the treatment of sacroiliac syndrome." Thesis, 2000. http://hdl.handle.net/10321/1941.
Full textThere has previously been a significant number of clinical trials supporting the efficacy of manipulation for the treatment of low back pain. In addition, the use of manipulation for the treatment of sacroiliac syndrome is well recognised. However, the management protocols involving the use of orthotics, used alone, or in combination with manipulation were found to be controversial. Orthotics seem to be frequently used in the clinical setting and yet there is a paucity of controlled clinical research advocating their application. The aim of this study was to determine the relative effectiveness of chiropractic manipulation used in combination with a non-stabilising sacroiliac orthotic (strapping) versus chiropractic manipulation used in combination with a stabilising sacroiliac orthotic in the treatment of sacroiliac syndrome. It was hypothesised that both treatment protocols would be effective in the management of sacroiliac syndrome, and that manipulation used in combination with a stabilising sacroiliac orthotic over a two week period would be more effective than manipulation used in combination with a non-stabilising sacroiliac orthotic, in terms of subjective and objective clinical f-Indings. The study design chosen was a comparative, randomised, controlled clinical trial. Sixty consecutive patients diagnosed with sacroiliac syndrome were randomly assigned either to the group receiving manipulation used in combination with a non-stabilising sacroiliac orthotic or the group receiving manipulation used in combination with a stabilising sacroiliac orthotic. The age range of patients extencled from eighteen to forty-nine, and included thirty-one males and thirty-three females. Statistically patients\x8F\x8F
M
Thompson, Neil. "The effectiveness of sacroiliac manipulation alone versus sacroiliac manipulation following ischaemic compression of gluteus medius trigger points in the treatment of sacroiliac syndrome." Thesis, 2002. http://hdl.handle.net/10321/295.
Full textIn recent years, sacroiliac syndrome has been widely accepted by many different health professions as one of the major contributors to mechanical low back pain. Manipulation to effect the relief of the condition has thus far proven to be one of the most effective methods. However, comparatively little research has been done on the different forms of physical therapy that can be used in conjunction with a manipulation so as to maximise its effect. This study focussed on the use of ischaemic compression (a well-accepted technique for the treatment of myofascial trigger points) of the gluteus medius muscle.
Naidoo, Jasantha. "The efficacy of sacroiliac adjustments versus pubic symphysis adjustments in the treatment of sacroiliac joint dysfunction." Thesis, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/10210/12384.
Full textThis study aims to compare sacroiliac joint adjustments versus pubic symphysis adjustments in the treatment of sacroiliac joint dysfunction with regards to pain and disability as well as alternative treatment approaches in treating sacroiliac joint dysfunction.This study was a comparative study that consisted of two groups of fifteen participants each. The participants were between the ages of eighteen and forty five with an equal male to female ratio. The potential participants were examined and accepted according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study. The method of treatment that was administered was determined by group allocation. Group 1 received Chiropractic manipulative therapy delivered to the restricted sacroiliac joint and Group 2 received Chiropractic manipulative therapy delivered to the pubic symphysis.Treatment consisted of six treatment sessions with an additional follow up consultation over a three week period. Objective and subjective data was measured at the beginning of the 1st, 4th and 7th consultations. Subjective readings were taken from The Oswestry Pain and Disability Questionnaire as well as The Numerical Pain Rating Scale. Objective measurements were taken from The Orthopaedic Rating Scale. Analysis of the data collected throughout the study were performed by a statistician. The Chiropractic manipulative techniques used were based on restrictions identified during motion palpation and were applied at the first six consultations, with the seventh consultation consisting of data collection only.
Morgan, Beverley. "The effects of sacroiliac manipulation on arthrogenic muscle inhibition in the hip musculature in patients with sacroiliac syndrome." Thesis, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/10321/196.
Full textIn symptomatic sacroiliac syndrome, nociceptors located within the capsule and ligaments of the sacroiliac joint are said to be activated which in turn act on inhibitory interneurons that synapse with the motor neuron pool of the muscles of that joint (muscles responsible for hip flexion, extension, abduction and adduction fall within the sacroiliac motor neuron pool). These inhibitory interneurons relay information that decreases the recruitment ability of that motor neuron pool. This is termed Arthrogenic muscle inhibition (AMI) and it has been stated that the number of motor units innervating a muscle relates positively to the strength of that muscle and hence may have an effect on the functional ability of that muscle. However, it has been proposed that spinal manipulation activates mechanoreceptors (Wyke receptors) from structures in and around the manipulated joint causing changes in motor neuron excitability through the altered afferent input and thereby causing an increase in motor neuron recruitment and a decrease in AMI. Furthermore, it has been found that sacroiliac joint problems have often been related to reduced or asymmetric range of motion (ROM) of the hip and / or lack of proprioceptive ability in the ipsilateral limb. In light of the above, manipulation has been found to cause a re-establishment of normal muscle tone and joint kinematics, therefore relaxing the muscles in that area and restoring normal ROM of the involved joint. This study presents the results of sacroiliac manipulation on objective hip measures (including peak torques, ROM and proprioception).
Terblanche, Melissa. "The short-term effect of sacroiliac manipulation on hip muscle strength in patients suffering from chronic sacroiliac syndrome." Thesis, 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/10321/2003.
Full textArthrogenic muscle inhibition (AMI) is the reflex inhibition of the muscles that surround an injured joint in consequence to disturbed afferent feedback originating from the receptors of that joint. The resultant altered afferent innervation of the motor neuron pool leads to a decrease in recruitment ability within the motor neuron pool, a decrease in contraction force of the muscles that fall within the motor neuron pool, and hence the clinical manifestation of AMI as a decrease in muscle strength. Spinal manipulation has been proposed to activate mechanoreceptors and proprioceptors within and around the manipulated joint. The altered afferent input arising from their stimulation is thought to cause changes in motor neuron excitability. In this respect, sacroiliac manipulation has been shown to effectively reduce muscle inhibition and increase muscle strength of the quadriceps muscle group in patients with anterior knee pain. The focus of AMI has been aimed primarily at the quadriceps muscle group whereas little information is available on the functional properties of the muscles moving the hip joint. Thus, the purpose of the present cohort study was to determine the short - term effect of sacroiliac manipulation on ipsilateral hip muscle strength and subjective low back pain intensity in thirty male subjects presenting with low back pain, attributable to chronic sacroiliac syndrome. The first objective of the study was to evaluate the short - term effect of sacroiliac manipulation on the strength of the musculature of the ipsilateral hip joint for the actions of flexion, extension, adduction and abduction by means of the Cybex Orthotren II Isokinetic Rehabilitation System, with respect to objective clinical findings.
M
Matkovich, Grant. "The immediate effect of sacroiliac manipulation on hip strength in patients suffering from chronic sacroiliac syndrome." Thesis, 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/10321/287.
Full textThe aim of this investigation was to investigate whether an immediate objective increase in hip strength was observed after an ipsilateral sacroiliac manipulation in patients suffering from chronic sacroiliac syndrome. The actions of hip flexion, extension, abduction and adduction were assessed. The study also investigated the patients’ subjective perception of pain due to the chronic sacroiliac syndrome before and after the manipulation. The proposed increases in strength would have been as a result of a reduction in arthrogenic muscle inhibition. Stimulation of nociceptors caused by the chronic sacroiliac syndrome would have lead to the presence of the arthrogenic muscle inhibition within the joint. Arthrogenic muscle inhibition has been described as an inability of a muscle group to utilise all its muscle fibres when performing a maximum voluntary contraction of that muscle group. Arthrogenic muscle inhibition is a joints natural response to pain, damage or distension within the joint. The response is an ongoing reflex inhibition of the muscles surrounding the joint in order to protect the joint. The inhibition of the surrounding musculature clinically manifests itself as a decrease in strength of the affected muscles. The decreased strength levels hampers rehabilitation of the affected joints as active exercise forms a vital role in the rehabilitation process. Current treatment options used to reduce arthrogenic muscle inhibition include lidocaine injection into the joint, cryotherapy and transcutaneous nerve stimulation. These treatments are aimed rather at the reduction of pain, joint effusions and atrophy of the related musculature than at the reduction of arthrogenic muscle inhibition. Recent studies have proposed that manipulation reduced arthrogenic muscle inhibition by causing excitation of the joint receptors, called the Wyke receptors. Stimulation of these joint receptors is thought to cause an alteration in the afferent input to the motorneuron pool resulting in a reduction of arthrogenic muscle inhibition. This study aimed to investigate whether sacroiliac manipulation could reduce arthrogenic muscle inhibition at the hip by assessing the immediate gains in hip muscle strength. The problem statement was to evaluate if an immediate subjective or objective change in hip strength was observed after an ipsilateral sacroiliac manipulation in patients suffering from chronic sacroiliac syndrome.
"The validity and specificity of the Arm Fossa test." Thesis, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/10210/2648.
Full textMitchell, Travis Dylan. "The predictive value of the sacral base pressure test in detecting specific types of sacroiliac dysfunction." Thesis, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/10210/612.
Full textDr. E.K. Urli Dr. J. Breitenbach Dr. C. Yelverton
Sher, Gregory Colin. "The effect of sacroiliac joint manipulation on quadriceps muscle strength." Thesis, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/10210/2694.
Full textDe, Beer Quintin Hardus. "The relative effectiveness of Kinesio® taping methods as an adjunct to a single sacroiliac joint manipulation in the treatment of chronic sacroiliac joint syndrome." Thesis, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10321/939.
Full textThe lifetime incidence of low back pain is between 48% to 79% in South Africa. Globally, chronic Sacroiliac Joint Syndrome occurs in 13% to 63% of the world’s population. Therefore, chronic Sacroiliac Joint Syndrome is a significant health problem that has the potential to have a major impact on quality of life. Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Syndrome is described as an alteration in normal motion or mechanics. The Sacroiliac Joint fibrous capsule contributes to proprioceptive and nociceptive output, which may be exacerbated when the joint is in a dysfunctional state. Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Syndrome may be effectively treated by spinal manipulative therapy. Spinal manipulative therapy is professed to have four therapeutic effects – mechanical correction, pain reducing effects, circulatory increase and neurobiologic effects. Similarly, Kinesio Tex® Tape therapy is professed to have comparable therapeutic effects – circulatory increase, pain reduction and stimulation of proprioceptive systems. Spinal manipulative therapy and Kinesio Tex® Tape therapy may, therefore, have similar therapeutic effects which, if used in adjunction, may produce enhanced therapeutic effects and accelerated results regarding reduction of symptoms in patients with chronic Sacroiliac Joint Syndrome. This investigation aimed to determine whether Kinesio ® Taping methods would have any relative effect on the Sacroiliac Joint, and whether it would be appropriate to use as an adjunct to spinal manipulative therapy in the treatment of chronic Sacroiliac Joint Syndrome. The study was a prospective stratified clinical trial with three intervention groups, twenty participants in each (n = 60). All participants were 18-50 years of age and suffering from chronic Sacroiliac Joint Syndrome. Subjective measurements included the Numerical Rating Scale and Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index. Objective measurements included the Algometer Scores. Numerical Rating Scale and Algometer measurements were taken before and immediately after treatment at the first consultation and at the second consultation. Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index measurements were taken at the first and second consultation. Group One underwent spinal manipulative therapy alone, Group Two underwent Kinesio Tex® Tape therapy alone and Group Three underwent both spinal manipulative therapy and Kinesio Tex® Tape therapy in combination. Comparisons were made using the Unpaired and Paired t-tests. The results for the Inter-group analyses suggested that most comparisons were statistically insignificant (p ≥ 0.05) which indicated that all treatment groups appeared to improve to a similar degree. The results for the Intra-group analyses suggested that most comparisons were statistically significant (p < 0.05) which indicated that Kinesio Tex® Tape therapy was effective as an adjunct to spinal manipulative therapy, however not statistically more or less effective that spinal manipulative therapy or Kinesio Tex® Tape therapy alone. In conclusion, it was found that some differences did occur, however these differences were not sufficient enough to conclude that one treatment was more effective than the other. Further research with a larger sample size, more frequent treatments and follow-ups, a more homogenous stratification of age, ethnic group, gender, side of diagnosis and categorizing participant occupation is needed in order for the power of the study to be amplified and, therefore, any results would carry more weight.
Hillermann, Bernd. "The effect of three manipulative treatment protocols on quadriceps muscle strength in patients with Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome." Thesis, 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/10321/284.
Full textKnee joint pathologies, in general, are associated with a loss of knee-extensor muscle strength. This weakness has been attributed to arthrogenic muscle inhibition (AMI). Manipulation of the sacroiliac (SI) has been shown to significantly reduce AMI and increase the strength in the quadriceps muscle group. Although both the knee and SI joints have been linked to AMI of the quadriceps muscle group, no studies have been conducted showing that manipulating the tibio-femoral (knee) joint has any effect on quadriceps muscle strength or AMI. The purpose of this study was therefore to verify whether manipulation of the knee (tibio-femoral) joint is as effective as SI joint manipulation in increasing quadriceps muscle strength in PFPS patients. This study also investigated the effect of combining manipulative therapy of the tibio-femoral and SI joints on quadriceps muscle strength in PFPS patients.
Bisset, Gregory. "The effect of a sacroiliac joint manipulation on hip rotation ranges of motion in patients suffering with chronic sacroiliac syndrome." Thesis, 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/10321/227.
Full textMechanical low back pain is one of the most common clinical disorders that most people seek help for (Painting et al. 1998:110). Epidemiological studies indicate a lifetime prevalence of low back pain ranging from 60 to 80% with an annual incidence of approximately 30% (Mosheni-Bandepi et al., 1998). The Sacroiliac (S.I.) joint is a significant source of pain in patients with chronic low back pain and it therefore warrants further study (Schwarzer et al. 1995:31). S.I. syndrome is defined as pain over the S.I. joint in the region of the posterior superior iliac spine, which may be accompanied by referred pain over the buttock, greater trochanter, groin, posterior thigh, knee, and occasionally to the postero-lateral calf, ankle and foot (Kirkaldy-Willis, 1992:123). Research indicates that there seems to be a correlation between low back pain, more specifically S.I. pain and hip rotation (Ellison et al. 1990, Cibulka et al. 1999, Fairbank et al. 1984). Cibulka et al. (1998) found that patients with lower back pain who were classified as having signs suggestive of S.I. regional pain had significantly more external rotation than internal rotation on the posterior innominate side i.e. side of S.I. dysfunction (approximately a 20 difference). Manipulation is recognised as an effective means of treating mechanical low back pain, with respect to both Lumbar Facet Joint Syndrome and S.I. Joint Syndrome (Assendelft et al. 1992 and Koes et al. 1996). Kirkaldy- Willis (1992:123) states that manipulation is the most certain way of relieving the symptoms of S.I. syndrome. This investigation aimed to determine the effect of a sacroiliac joint manipulation on hip rotation ranges of motion (active and passive motion) in patients with chronic sacroiliac syndrome in terms of objective measures.
Schooling, Leonie. "The immediate effect of a chiropractic sacroiliac joint adjustment on gait." Thesis, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10210/8315.
Full textPurpose: The pelvis, femur, tibia, fibula, ankle and foot form a closed kinematic chain during gait. According to biomechanical principles any restriction or tension in one part of the kinematic chain will create increased load on the other parts of the same chain (Comerford and Mottram, 2001; Sahrmann, 2000). This increased load can lead to dysfunction and compensation along the chain and also lead to gait anomalies. A chiropractic adjustment is utilised for the treatment of sacroiliac joint restrictions. There has not been research conducted to establish the effects that a chiropractic adjustment has on lower limb biomechanics and gait. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a sacroiliac adjustment had an effect on gait by looking at the gait parameters. Method: Sixty participants who were between the ages of 18 and 40 years were recruited. The participants were asked to sign a consent form and then a thorough history and physical examination was performed to ensure that participants did not have any disease or pathology that may have excluded them from the study. These included foot pathologies, knee pathologies, hip pathologies, structural leg length discrepancies, or any contraindications to chiropractic adjustment. A lumbar spine regional examination as well as motion palpation of the sacroiliac joints was performed to determine which joints were restricted. Each participant then underwent a gait assessment before and after they received a chiropractic adjustment to the restricted sacroiliac joint. Procedure: Participants only received one adjustment. Objective measurements were obtained using the Zebris FDM gait analysis system. This system uses high-quality capacitive force sensors that are arranged in matrix form. As a result, each sensor produces its own calibration curve. The measuring plates enable the static and dynamic force distribution to be analysed under the feet while standing and walking. The measuring plate is integrated in a level walking area. The measuring parameters are automatically calculated in the WinFDM program and a printable, easy to read report of the measuring results is then available (Zebris Medical GmbH, Germany). Each participant walked over the measuring plate for 4 times. This was done before and after the adjustment.Results: Statistically significant changes were seen between the pre and post treatment measurements of foot rotation on the treatment side, the step length on the treatment side, the stride length, the stance phase on both the treatment and non-treatment sides, the swing phase on the treatment and non-treatment side and the total double support. Conclusion: This study shows that a chiropractic adjustment to the sacroiliac joint does change certain gait parameters and it should therefore be part of any treatment regime for gait abnormalities. Podiatrists, biokineticists and chiropractors should work together when treating patients with gait abnormalities. As the study only recruited asymptomatic participants, further studies are necessary to determine the effect a chiropractic adjustment has on the gait of symptomatic patients.
Swanepoel, Shaylene. "The effect of sacroiliac joint manipulation compared to manipulation and static stretching of the posterior oblique sling group of muscles in participants with chronic sacroiliac joint syndrome." Thesis, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10321/2912.
Full textSacroiliac joint syndrome is diagnosed in patients who complain of various painful symptoms associated to their lower back, for example: hip and groin pain, sciatica pain, and / or a need to frequently urinate. They further report that their pain is further intensified when standing from sitting, stair walking, bending forward or from sitting or standing too long. Sacroiliac joint syndrome has been widely accepted by health professions as a contributor to low back pain. Spinal manipulation has shown to be an effective method for pain relief of this condition. Studies have been done using physical therapy in conjunction with manipulation in treating sacroiliac joint syndrome. However, little research has been done on the effects of static stretching and manipulation combined. The posterior oblique sling group of muscles is created by the biceps femoris, gluteus maximus, erector spinae and latissimus dorsi muscles. The sacroiliac joint can be affected by the functional relationship of the posterior oblique sling muscles. These muscles are involved in forces across the sacroiliac joint. Tightness of muscles can affect the sacroiliac joint. Flexibility is an essential element of normal biomechanical functioning. Flexibility of muscles, tendons and ligaments can influence a joints range of motion. There is evidence that suggests that stretching could increase a joint’s range of motion which was evident one or more days after the stretching protocol in people without clinically significant contractures. Upon review of the related literature, it appears that there is insufficient literature assessing the clinical effectiveness of static stretching of the posterior oblique muscle sling group with respect to sacroiliac joint syndrome. Therefore this study is aimed at providing insight into the role of the posterior oblique muscle sling group in participants with and chronic sacroiliac joint syndrome. It is hypothesized that effective treatment of these muscles will allow for a more effective outcome of symptoms. The study design chosen was a randomised, clinical trial consisting of thirty voluntary participants’ between the ages 18 to 45 years suffering from chronic sacroiliac joint syndrome. There were two groups of fifteen participants, who received four treatment consultations within a two week period. Participants placed into Group One received sacroiliac joint manipulation only, while participants in Group Two received static stretching of the posterior oblique muscle sling and sacroiliac joint manipulation. Subjective and objective readings were taken at the first, third and fourth (final) consultations. The Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NRS) and the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index (OSW) questionnaires were used to assess the subjective findings whilst the objective measurements were collected from results of algometer and inclinometer readings. The intra-group analysis revealed there was a statistically significant improvement within both groups for NRS, OSW, and inclinometer results. It appeared that Group Two fared better in terms of the algometer (pressure) results. The inter-group analysis revealed that all comparisons apart from the algometer readings had no statistically significant improvement between the two groups. From the intra-group comparisons of the objective data, participants in both groups experienced a statistically significant improvement. However, Group Two fared better in terms of the algometric pressure readings (p = 0.001). This study confirms that both treatment protocols were effective in reducing the signs and symptoms associated with sacroiliac joint syndrome. Although the readings were not statistically significant, there is evidence that Group Two responded better than Group One in terms of the algometer readings (Figure 4.13). There is insufficient literature on studies related to the posterior oblique sling muscles, and therefore, comparisons are needed with respect to the posterior oblique muscle sling group and its effects on the sacroiliac joint. This study concludes that overall there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups and recommends that further studies be undertaken with a greater number of participants to gauge if a more significant result can be achieved.
M
Venter, Stefanus Marthinus. "The effects of sacroiliac joint manipulation in the treatment of piriformis dysfunction." Thesis, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10210/6684.
Full textThe primary focus of this study was to compare different treatment protocols namely Chiropractic Adjustive Therapy of the Sacroiliac Joint, lschaemic Compression of Trigger Points within the Piriformis muscle and Chiropractic Adjustive Therapy of the Sacroiliac Joint combined with lschaemic Compression of Piriformis Trigger Points in the treatment of a dysfunctional Piriformis muscle, to see which of the chosen treatment protocols would be the superior choice in treating the dysfunctional muscle. It was hypothesised that all the chosen treatment protocols would be effective in treating a dysfunctional Piriformis muscle, while it was hoped that the Chiropractic Manipulative Therapy of the Sacroiliac Joint would be the superior choice in treating a dysfunctional Piriformis muscle. Participants were recruited via posters and flyers in and around the University of Johannesburg Campuses. Forty five participants were recruited and randomly divided into three groups (Groupl received Chiropractic Manipulation of the Sacroiliac joint, Group 2 received Chiropractic Manipulation of the Sacroiliac joint combined with lschemic compression of the Piriformis muscle and Group 3 received only lschemic compression of the Piriformis muscle) by drawing a number from a box marked one, two and three for the different treatment protocols. The participants were given a consent and information leaflet which they had to sign and any questions they had were answered to the best of the researcher's ability. All the participants received five treatments and Algometer measurements were taken before and after every treatment and Numerical Pain Rating Scale forms were completed by the participant before treatment one and after treatment five. The results showed a significant decrease in pain perceived by the participants in all the different groups on the Numerical Pain Rating Scale and on the Algometer measurements. When looking at the Numerical Pain Rating Scale Scores the group that received ischaemic compression (Group 2) had the most improvement and when comparing the Algometer Measurements between the groups, the group that received only the Chiropractic Adjustive Therapy of the Sacro-iliac Joints (Group 1) had the best improvement.
Thompson, Joseph. "Reliability and validity of selected pain provocation tests at the sacroiliac joint." Thesis, 2003. https://vuir.vu.edu.au/932/.
Full textThompson, Joseph. "Reliability and validity of selected pain provocation tests at the sacroiliac joint." 2003. http://eprints.vu.edu.au/932/1/Thompson_et.al_2003.pdf.
Full textVan, Doorene Kate. "A comparative study between sacroiliac adjustments and dry needling of the gluteus medius muscle in the treatment of sacroiliac joint dysfunction." Thesis, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10210/5226.
Full textThe aim of this research study was to determine the most effective way of treating sacroiliac joint dysfunction with associated gluteus medius trigger points, using adjusting of the sacroiliac joint or needling of the gluteus medius muscle or both. The participants were recruited randomly and placed in 3 different groups. Participants in group 1 were treated with an adjustment of the sacroiliac joint, as well as needling of the most prominent gluteus medius trigger point. Participants in group 2 were adjusted only and participants in group 3 were needled only. The treatment of the participants took place at the University of Johannesburg’s chiropractic day clinic. The objective data was acquired using a Digital Inclinometer to measure the ranges of motion at the spinal levels of the 5th lumbar vertebra and the first sacral vertebra (L5/ S1). An Algometer was used to measure the amount of pressure required to evoke pain, within the most prominent trigger point being treated. The subjective data was acquired using the Oswestry Pain and Disability Questionnaire, as well as the Numerical Pain Rating Scale. The results of the trial were of no statistical significance, but clinical improvement in both objective and subjective data was found. Group 2’s mean value percentage improvement was the greatest, when looking at range of motion. Group 1’s mean value percentage improvement was the greatest, with the Algometer and the subjective readings. The outcome of this study was that overall all three treatment protocols had a positive effect on the participants. Group 1 and group 2 had a slightly greater overall improvement. Thus it is suggested that when treating sacroiliac joint dysfunction with associated gluteus medius trigger points, the doctor can use an adjustment or adjusting with needling, both are effective. It is important to take the patients preference into account in order to make them feel at ease with the treatment they are receiving.
Moodley, Lineshnee. "The relative effectiveness of spinal manipulative therapy combined with transcutaneous flurbiprofen versus spinal manipulative therapy combined with either menthol or non-medicated placebo patches in the management of sacroiliac syndrome." Thesis, 2002. http://hdl.handle.net/10321/288.
Full textMcGregor et al ( 1998) stated that approximately 50 – 80 % of the population in Western society will experience low back pain at some point. According to Cibulka and Koldehoff (1999), the sacroiliac joint is a common cause of low back pain that is overlooked. This study aimed to provide insight into the relative effectiveness of three different approaches in the management of sacroiliac syndrome. Giles and Muller (1999) concluded that spinal manipulative therapy was an effective form of treatment for spinal pain syndromes whilst Burgos et al (2001) states that the use of transcutaneous non-steroidal anti-inflammatories in the management of musculoskeletal conditions is a common therapeutic strategy. This investigation aimed to determine the relative effectiveness of spinal manipulative therapy combined with transcutaneous flurbiprofen (TransAct® patches ) versus spinal manipulative therapy combined with either menthol or non-medicated placebo patches in the management of sacroiliac syndrome, in terms of objective and subjective measures.
Ranwell, Ivan Henry. "The relative effectiveness of manipulation with and without the contract-relax-antagonist-contract technique of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching of the piriformis muscles in the treatment of sacroiliac syndrome." Thesis, 2001. http://hdl.handle.net/10321/2159.
Full textThis study aims to provide insight into the relative effectiveness of two different approaches in the treatment of sacro - iliac syndrome. Until recently, the sacro - iliac joints were not commonly considered to be mobile enough to suffer from detectable restriction of motion (Panzer and Gatterman 1995:453). Kirkaldy - Willis et al. (1992:126) however, states that sacro - iliac syndrome is a well defined and common type of dysfunction. Frymoyer et al. (1991 :2114) also reports sacro - iliac syndrome to be common, although it is frequently overlooked as a source of low back pain. This study will attempt to determine whether manipulation of the sacro - iliac joints together with Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (P.N.F.) stretching of the piriformis muscles is a more effective treatment for sacro - iliac syndrome, than manipulation alone. This will be accomplished by determining which approach yields the best patient response in terms of subjective and objective clinical findings. The study conducted was a randomised clinical trial consisting of two groups of 30 patients each. The patients were randomly allocated into the two groups. All patients received four treatments over a two - week period. Group one received manipulation of the sacro - iliac joints alone, while Group two received manipulation of the sacro - iliac joints together with P.N.F. stretching of the piriformis muscles. Only the sacro - iliac joint on the side of the sacro - iliac syndrome was manipulated, and only the piriformis muscle on the side of the sacro - iliac syndrome was stretched. If any patients became asymptomatic within the treatment period, then the treatment was terminated. The patients were however required to return for all the remaining consultations for observational purposes. The results of the Numerical Pain Rating Scale, Oswestry Low Back Disability Index questionnaire, inclinometer and algometer readings, as well as the sacro - iliac orthopaedic tests, were recorded before the first and second treatments, and immediately following the fourth (final) treatment.
M
Schalekamp, Kobus. "The effect of lumbar and sacroiliac joint manipulation on sustaining muscle endurance in cycling." Thesis, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/10210/9007.
Full textThis study was conducted in order to determine if Chiropractic Spinal Manipulative Therapy (SMT) to the lumbar spine and Sacroiliac joints can accelerate the recovery process of the Hamstring and Quadriceps femoris muscle and thus enabling the athlete to sustain endurance levels for a longer period of time. Participants used were recruited from the cycling community by means of word of mouth. Thirty participants that matched the inclusion criteria were included in the study. The participants were then randomly divided into two groups, a Test Group and a Control Group, of fifteen participants each. Motion and static palpation was used to detect spinal restrictions. The Test Group received Chiropractic SMT to the restricted lumbar vertebral segments and the Sacroiliac joints after the first test was completed. The participants then underwent a 30 minute recovery period after which they were re-tested. The Control Group received no treatment after the first test, but still had a 30 minute recovery period after which they were re-tested. Objective measurements were taken by making use of Cybex Isokinetic Dynamometer. The objective measurement indicated that there was an increase in muscle endurance of the Quadriceps femoris and Hamstring muscle groups for both the test and the Control Group. When the increase in Hamstring and Quadriceps femoris muscle endurance was compared between the Test and Control Group, it was the Control Group that showed a more significant increase in Quadriceps femoris muscle endurance which was greater than the increase of the Quadriceps femoris muscle endurance in the Test Group. The Control Group also showed a greater increase mean endurance of the Quadriceps femoris and Hamstring muscle. In conclusion to the study, muscle endurance in cyclists can be increased by rest alone and does not require Chiropractic SMT to restricted spinal segments.
Coetzee, Natasha. "The effect of the activator adjusting instrument in the treatment of chronic sacroiliac joint syndrome." Thesis, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/10321/1001.
Full textMoorcroft, Rayne. "A study to determine the usefulness of the Gonstead Listing System as an indicator of the direction of adjusting the sacroiliac joint in the treatment of sacroiliac syndrome." Thesis, 1997. http://hdl.handle.net/10321/2821.
Full textThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of the Gonstead Listing System as a reliable indicator of the direction in which to adjust the sacroiliac joint in subjects with sacroiliac joint dysfunction, in terms of their subjective and objective clinical findings. The hypothesis is that the direction of manipulation is clinically insignificant in causing a decrease in the subject's clinical findings. This information is necessary in order for chiropractors to formulate a more cost-effective treatment protocol for their patients.
M
Breitenbach, Jacques Gerard. "The validity of the sacral base pressure test in detecting sacroiliac joint dysfunction." Thesis, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/10210/2847.
Full textShearar, Kirstin Anne. "The relative effectiveness of manual manipulation versus manipulation using the activator adjusting instrument in the management of acute on chronic sacroiliac syndrome." Thesis, 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/10321/165.
Full textLow back pain is a significant health problem that has had a major impact on quality of life and on health care costs (Weiner, et al. 2000:450). Schwarzer, et al. (1995) established the sacroiliac joint to be a significant source of pain in patients with chronic low back pain. Bernard and Kirkaldy-Willis (1987:2107-2130) established the sacroiliac joint to be the primary source of low back pain in 22.5% of 1293 patients presenting with back pain. According to a review article by Hendler, et al. (1995:169), “manipulation provides dramatic relief” in cases of sacroiliac syndrome. Little research, however, has been done regarding instrument manipulation and it’s effect on acute, chronic or acute on chronic sacroiliac syndrome. Osterbauer and De Boer, et al. (1993) found a significant decrease in Visual Analogue Scale and Oswestry scores following treatment using instrument manipulation for sacroiliac joint syndrome. They also noted a reduction in the number of pain provocation tests applied to the research subjects. “Unless reliability and validity of assessments and effectiveness of treatment procedures can be demonstrated, clinicians should temper their claims of measurement of, and direct effects on, the sacroiliac joint” (Walker 1992:914). The study design was a randomised, omparative clinical trial. Sixty voluntary subjects were accepted onto the trial; each diagnosed as having acute on chronic sacroiliac joint syndrome, and divided into two groups of thirty subjects. Each subject received five treatments within a three-week period. The subjects in group one received manipulation using the Diversified Technique of manipulation and those in group two received instrument manipulation using the “Activator Adjusting Instrument”.
Reid, Alan Roger. "A comparison of two manipulative techniques in the treatment of sacroiliac syndrome." Thesis, 1997. http://hdl.handle.net/10321/2770.
Full textSacroiliac syndrome is a painful, debilitating condition that may cause considerable discomfort (Haldeman 1992), it is a common condition causing low back pain (Mierau, et al 1984, Guo and Zhao 1994), it is also believed by Bernard and Cassidy (1991) to be a frequently overlooked source of low back pain. Between 9 and 19.5 % of all sickness absence days are due to low back pain (Andersson 1981)
M
Birdsey, Paul Craig. "The reliability of motion palpation versus a traditional chiropractic method for the analysis of chronic mechanical sacroiliac joint syndrome." Thesis, 2000. http://hdl.handle.net/10321/2762.
Full textSacroiliac joint syndrome represents a common cause of lower back pain (Cassidy and Burton 1992:3). However, much controversy exists regarding the most reliable method used to diagnose and determine sacroiliac joint dysfunction (Wiles and Faye 1992).
M
Botha, Quentin Martin. "The efficacy of a single maintained contact drop piece manipulation technique in the treatment of sacroiliac syndrome." Thesis, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/10321/337.
Full textResearch indicates the sacroiliac joint (prevalence of sacroiliac syndrome ranges from 19.3% and 47.9% (Toussaint et al., 1999)) as being the primary source of low-back pain in 22.5% of patients with back pain (Bernard et al., 1987:2107-2130). Treatment options that are available for the treatment of low-back pain include allopathic (Hellman and Stone, 2000), and manual therapies such as hydrotherapy and traction (Cull and Will, 1995). It has been found that allopathic interventions have been less effective than spinal manipulative therapy, even with spinal manipulative therapy having various modes of application (e.g. side posture and drop piece manipulations) (Gatterman et al., 2001). Drop table thrusting techniques were found to be effective for patients with neuromuskuloskeletal problems such as facet syndrome (Haldeman et al., 1993), however, it is still not known which specific drop piece technique is the most appropriate for sacroiliac syndrome. Thus it is important to ascertain the clinical effectiveness of the technique as certain conditions prevent the patient from being positioned in the conventional side posture for treatment of sacroiliac syndrome (White, 2003; Pooke, 2003; Hyde, 2003; Pretorius, 2003; Haldeman, 2003; Cramer, 2003; Engelbrecht, 2003). Therefore this study aims at determining the efficacy of a maintained contact drop piece manipulation technique.
Noizadan, Omid. "A comparative study between the effect of thigh-ilio deltoid adjustment and pelvic blocking in patients with sacroiliac syndrome." Thesis, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/10210/933.
Full textPretorius, Grant. "A comparative study between the effects of side-lying sacroiliac adjustments and Sacro Occipital Technic on the muscle strength of the gastrocnemius muscle in asymptomatic adult males." Thesis, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/10210/842.
Full textDr. Chris Yelverton Dr. Malany Moodley