Relevant bibliographies by topics / Russia – Economic policy – 1861-1917

Academic literature on the topic 'Russia – Economic policy – 1861-1917'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 10 March 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Contents

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Russia – Economic policy – 1861-1917.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Russia – Economic policy – 1861-1917"

1

Gatrell, Peter. "Economic culture, economic policy and economic growth in Russia, 1861-1914." Cahiers du monde russe : Russie, Empire russe, Union soviétique, États indépendants 36, no. 1 (1995): 37–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/cmr.1995.2420.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Romanova, Ekaterina Vladimirovna. "Perception of the Policy of Soviet Russia in British Government Circles in November 1917 – August 1918 ." Исторический журнал: научные исследования, no. 5 (May 2022): 155–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.7256/2454-0609.2022.5.38704.

Full text
Abstract:
The problem of Anglo-Russian relations in the first months after the October revolution (and the question of the British perception of the Soviet government’s policy as one of its aspects) has been more than once studied by both Russian and foreign historians. However, it still deserves attention both because in the majority of works the period indicated was considered within a longer time span of the Allied intervention, being shadowed by the latter, and due to disagreements among scholars over which factors were fundamental in determining the British attitude towards Soviet Russia. The fact that the revolution in Russia broke out during the World War to a large extent determined London’s perception of the Soviet government’s policy, which was considered primarily from the point of view of its actual and potential influence on the course of the military confrontation with the Central Powers. Although British policy towards Soviet Russia lacked unanimity and consistency, some general trends can be discerned. In spite of the armistice and then the peace treaty between Russia and the Central Powers, until the summer of 1918 Britain did not deny the possibility of military and economic cooperation with Soviet Russia on the anti-German basis. The growing perception of the Bolsheviks weakness in summer 1918, the apprehension of the prospect of their complete subordination to the German influence or a pro-German coup in Russia, along with other factors, determined a clear anti-Soviet turn in the British policy.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Zubkov, Konstantin I., Igor V. Poberezhnikov, and Georgy N. Shumkin. "Imperial Power and The Policy of Transformation of the Outlying Lands." Journal of Frontier Studies 7, no. 2 (May 30, 2022): 165–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.46539/jfs.v7i2.325.

Full text
Abstract:
The article examines the structure and content of the monograph “Center and Regions: Economic Policy of the Government on the Outlying Lands of the Russian Empire (1894–1917)” which was prepared by a team of St. Petersburg and Moscow historians under the editorship of M.V. Khodyakov; it analyzes the characteristic features of the authors’ approaches and the significance of this work for current practices of studying the Russian Empire’s outlying areas. This monograph is a non-ordinary historiographical phenomenon in terms of its goals (to give an integral, comprehensive view of the economic policy of the center in relation to the “outlying regions”), the number of tasks implemented and the total extend of the work done. The monograph includes 31 paragraphs, each devoted to poorly studied or entirely unexplored problems. However, due to the unsatisfactory elaboration of fundamental theoretical and conceptual issues, as well as the scale of the project, and the limited time span set for its implementation, the reviewed work contains a number of shortcomings: a weak introduction (especially a historiographical survey), superficial conclusions (or their absence in paragraphs), the inconsistency of the subject of some paragraphs with the matter of economic policy. But despite of all the shortcomings, this work represents a significant contribution to the study of the frontier spaces of Russia as regards both the concrete historical material introduced into scientific circulation, and the non-trivial attempt itself to create a generalizing picture of imperial economic policy on the outlying areas of Russia in the late 19th – early 20th centuries.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Aborvalova, O. N. "Trade in Soviet Russia During the Formation of a Socialist Economy (1917–1924 years)." Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law 12, no. 1 (2012): 44–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2012-12-1-44-48.

Full text
Abstract:
This article analyzes the specifics of trade in the period of the socialist economy, trying to replace trade distribution system, the search for new organizational forms of supply of the population, the need for a new economic policy.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Shishkina, Olga E. "The reasons for the institutionalization of administrative responsibility in post-revolutionary Russia (1917-1924)." Historical and social-educational ideas 13, no. 2 (April 29, 2021): 161–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.17748/2075-9908-2021-13-2-161-174.

Full text
Abstract:
Introduction. The relevance of this topic is due to the ongoing reform of responsibility for administrative offenses, discussions in the scientific literature on the delimitation of crimes and administrative offenses and the grounds for their delinquency. The study of the historical stages of the normative isolation of responsibility for administrative offenses from the point of view of events taking place in political, economic and social life, in our opinion, helps in determining the development trends of this institution. In this article, the author aims to identify the reasons and conditions for administrative responsibility as an independent institution after the Great October Socialist Revolution. The gradual normative separation of responsibility for administrative offenses from criminal responsibility falls on the period of war communism and the first half of the New Economic Policy (NEP). Methods. The author uses the classical historical and legal research method, which includes both a chronological analysis of social, political and economic factors, and a study of the legal regulation of legal institutions over a period of time. Results. In the first years of Soviet power, administrative coercion, along with other measures of state coercion, was considered as one of the means of strengthening socialist legality and fundamental order and security. The normative separation of administrative responsibility from criminal responsibility during the first half of the new economic policy was due to the development of economic relations and technical progress. In general, it was associated with Soviet ideology, a permissive type of legal regulation, an increase in the number of rules issued by the state in various spheres of public life, the creation of control and supervisory bodies that required their own operational leverage on citizens and organizations, including in the form of imposing penalties.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Klepach, A., and G. Kuranov. "Cyclical Waves in the Economic Development of the U.S. and russia (Issues of Methodology and Analysis)." Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 11 (November 20, 2013): 4–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2013-11-4-33.

Full text
Abstract:
The article describes the methodology for identifying and analyzing economic cycles, which are based on historical spectral approach that combines the advantages of the historical and economic analysis and spectral method of the study of economic series. The proposed approach is used to isolate and analyze both their own regular fluctuations of economic dynamics inherent in the developed economies and the vibrations induced by technological and external economic shocks. The analysis has been carried out on the basis of data on the dynamics of the post-war U.S. economy as the main driver of world cycles, and of Russia’s economy from 1861 to 2012 using the latest research on the reconstruction of the time-series of its economic dynamics. Finally, conclusions are drawn in relation to the state economic policy in the conditions of the global cyclical development.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Smirnova, T. M. "Topical Issues in the Study of Soviet Social Policy, 1917−1929." Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences 92, S8 (December 2022): S800—S809. http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/s1019331622140143.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract A series of 100th anniversaries of recent years (the First World War, the Revolution of 1917, the Russian Civil War, the introduction of the NEP) has stimulated historians and representatives of related sciences (sociologists, philosophers, political scientists, culturologists, economic historians, etc.) to summarize the study of this turning point for the national history of the period, which is increasingly often regarded as homogeneous (“the time of wars and revolutions”), as well as its immediate consequences, stretching back to the 1920s and 1930s. The works published within the framework of the anniversaries and the discussions that flared up around them more clearly exposed the least studied and controversial aspects of the problems and made it possible to identify urgent tasks for the future. Quite expectedly, the focus was on subjects such as rethinking the causes of the revolutionary events and the role of various social groups in them; comparison of the events of February and October 1917, the degree of discontinuity and continuity of processes and the existence of alternative ways of Russia’s development; characteristics of the armed forces and political movements opposed to the Bolsheviks; the relation of “red” and “white” terror; problems of social stratification in postrevolutionary Russia and the relationship between the concepts of former people, the socially alien, economically dangerous elements, NEPmen; etc. In addition, summarizing the results of studying the revolution and its consequences has contributed to the revival of conceptual discussions about totalitarianism, the social base of the Soviet regime of the 1920s−1930s, and the features of the formation of civil society in Russia, as well as about the conditions for the formation and specifics of the “welfare state” of the Soviet type. At the same time, one should admit that the problem of the social policy of the Bolsheviks, which directly relates to many of the above conceptual or debatable issues, remained practically outside the framework of scientific, historical, and political discussions. Meanwhile, for example, the outcome of the Civil War and the further fate of Russia were largely determined by the nature and priorities of the social policy of the warring parties, the degree of the attractiveness of their slogans for ordinary people in the rear and at the front, as well as the ability to bring these slogans to life. The problems of continuity with the pre-Soviet past of the country, the novelty and relevance for society of the Bolsheviks’ transformations in the social sphere, and their compliance with the global trends of the era also seem key to understanding many debatable issues of early Soviet history. In particular, it is impossible to answer the question about the presence or absence of elements of civil society and the so-called “welfare state” in Soviet Russia without an objective assessment of the social slogans declared by the state and the methods of their implementation, as well as the nature of the interaction between the authorities and society in solving certain topical tasks.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Lohvynenko, I. A., and Ye S. Lohvynenko. "Ukrainian-Russian Relationship in 1917-1918: History Lessons." Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs 89, no. 2 (June 26, 2020): 26–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.32631/v.2020.2.02.

Full text
Abstract:
The author has carried out a comparative analysis of Ukrainian-Russian relationship between the days of the Ukrainian Central Rada and the modern period. The character and ideological basis of stable tendencies in Russia’s policy towards Ukraine have been demonstrated. The similarity in the approaches of the Russian central government to the so-called “solution of the Ukrainian issue” has been determined; the essence of Russian chauvinism in understanding the right of nations to self-determination has been demonstrated. The causes and consequences of the war between Soviet Russia and the Ukrainian People’s Republic have been analyzed. The author has determined the main significant, fateful mistakes of the leaders of the Central Rada within relations with the People’s Commissar of Russia, which led to the loss of authority and support of the Ukrainian people for national power and, as a consequence, the collapse of the Ukrainian People’s Republic. The nature and essence of the ideology of the so-called “Russian world” have been revealed. It has been concluded that the history of Ukrainian statehood in 1917-1918 is instructive in many aspects, since it shows that one of the main reasons for the defeat of the Ukrainian Central Rada, which ultimately failed to defend the Ukrainian People’s Republic, was the lack of necessary consolidation of national political forces in solving urgent state affairs (creation and development of own army, timely solution of social, economic problems, efficiency of work of legislative and executive agencies, etc.). It has been noted that the challenges currently facing the Ukrainian state – Russia’s annexation of Crimea, the invasion of its troops in the East, the information war, the propaganda of the so-called “Russian world”, etc. – are not new. In many ways, they repeat what happened in 1917-1918. In particular, the proclamation of puppet pseudo-republics “DNR” and “LNR” in the East of Ukraine, through which Russian troops de facto launched the war against Ukraine. That is why modern Ukrainian politicians need to learn the lessons from the past. Nowadays, when Ukraine is defending its independence from Russia, Ukrainian statesmen and politicians must abandon their narrow party and self-interests and work together to protect national achievements from the encroachments of the “Russian world”, the most important of which is the state of Ukraine.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Gapsalamov, Almaz R., Vladimir L. Vasilev, Tatyana N. Bochkareva, and Elvir M. Akhmetshin. "REFLECTION ON THE FIRST EXPERIENCES IN CREATING THE ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (1917 - EARLY 1920s)." IZVESTIYA VUZOV SEVERO-KAVKAZSKII REGION SOCIAL SCIENCE, no. 3 (215) (September 30, 2022): 38–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.18522/2687-0770-2022-3-38-44.

Full text
Abstract:
The presented study is devoted to the processes of formation of the public administration system in the early years of the establishment of Soviet power, as well as the problems that characterized this process. The actualization of these issues today is not accidental, modern political and economic difficulties force us to take a different look at the mechanism for organizing the management of the economic sphere of Russian society, the search for new tools for creating effective institutions and management tools. The purpose of the presented work is to study the organizational features of the formation of the state management system of the economy of Soviet Russia in the post-October period and before the start of the new economic policy. The study involves the use of methods of analysis, synthesis, and deduction. The vector of building a control system was seen by the Bolshevik leadership in the centralization of control, which was due to both the ideological setting and the critical domestic political situation. In practice, the study showed the impossibility of centralizing management in 1917-1921, which was associated with both organizational problems and personnel difficulties.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Arlyapova, Elena, and Elena Ponomareva. "State building in Ingushetia and Chechnya (1917—1944): imperial traditions and Soviet innovations." OOO "Zhurnal "Voprosy Istorii" 2022, no. 5-2 (May 1, 2022): 32–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.31166/voprosyistorii202205statyi34.

Full text
Abstract:
The article continues a series of publications on the political, socio-economic, and demographic development of Chechens and Ingush. This study raises the issues of the formation and evolution of the statehood of the Chechen-Ingush ASSR. The incompleteness of this process in modern Russia gives additional relevance to the analysis. The article shows that the Soviet experience of state construction in the region has apparent similarities with previous imperial policy. They are pragmatism at the heart of the theory and practice of regulating political and socio-economic life, economic integration into the body of a large country, and the creation of conditions for the development of ethnic self-identification of the Caucasian peoples.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Russia – Economic policy – 1861-1917"

1

DOROFEYUK, Maria. "Dynamics and structure of strikes : on the way to the first Russian Revolution." Doctoral thesis, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/34981.

Full text
Abstract:
Defence date: 12 February 2015
Examining Board: Professor Federico Giovanni (EUI Supervisor) ; Professor Youssef Cassis (EUI Second Reader) ; Professor Leonid Borodkin (Lomonosov Moscow State University) ; Professor Jean-Paul Depretto (Toulouse University).
The research seeks to explore the basic characteristics of labor conflicts in the Russian Empire from the year 1895 to 1905. The central theme of the research is the structure of these labor conflicts, which varied by year, region and branch of industry. A second main subject is the nature of the interactions between the major factors in the labor movement in pre-revolutionary Russia. This work seeks to determine if there is a correlation between the features of the conflict and the intensity of the strike movement. The dissertation gives a new vision of the important phenomenon in the social and political history of Russia in the end of 19th / the beginning of 20th century. The present study is concerned with the lack of statistical analysis of labor conflicts in pre-revolutionary Russia. Particular attention is given to the scale of the strikes that affected all the regions of the Russian Empire and all branches of industry. The period 1895-1904 which is under consideration in the dissertation is important in Russian social history because it was the decade when the workers movement becomes more organized and politically motivated on the way to the first Russian Revolution. The research is focused on the analysis of dynamics and structure of labor conflicts in Russian industries in the decade which preceded the first Russian Revolution (1905-1907). The author characterizes the historical context of the process under consideration and provides the comparative analysis of labor conflicts in the main industrial regions of European part of Russian Empire (Left-Bank Ukraine, St.-Petersburg and Central Industrial Region) on the edge of centuries. The substantial part of the work is oriented to verification of the working hypothesis by means of the statistical analysis of a variety of labor conflicts based on the materials of the two big data bases.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Russia – Economic policy – 1861-1917"

1

Merchants and markets in revolutionary Russia, 1917-30. New York: St. Martin's Press in association with the Centre for Russian and East European Studies, University of Birmingham, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Russia: Class and power, 1917-2000. London: Bookmarks, 2002.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Il pane quotidiano: Ideologia e congiuntura nella Russia sovietica (1917-1921). Bologna: Il mulino, 2001.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Verbina, O. L. Regulirovanie obshchestvennykh otnosheniĭ v sfere promyshlennogo predprinimatelʹstva v poreformennyĭ period 1861-1914 gg: Na materialakh Kurskoĭ gubernii : monografii︠a︡. Kursk: Uchitelʹ, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Popular opinion in Stalin's Russia: Terror, propaganda, and dissent, 1934-1941. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Sheila, Fitzpatrick, Rabinowitch Alexander, and Stites Richard 1931-, eds. Russia in the era of NEP: Explorations in Soviet society and culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Daniels, Robert Vincent. Is Russia reformable?: Change and resistance from Stalin to Gorbachev. Boulder: Westview Press, 1988.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Fiehn, Terry. Russia & the USSR 1905-1941. London: J. Murray, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Revolution in the factory: The birth of the Soviet textile industry, 1917-1920. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Rees, E. A. State control in Soviet Russia: The rise and fall of the Workers' and Peasants' Inspectorate, 1920-34. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1987.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Russia – Economic policy – 1861-1917"

1

Galbraith, John Kenneth. "Completion and Criticism." In Economics in Perspective. Princeton University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691171647.003.0014.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter examines the criticisms hurled against economic ideas associated with the classical tradition in the industrial world during the first decades of the twentieth century. Karl Marx was long gone from the scene, but disturbing ideas would come from his heir, Lenin. One was the notion that the working class of the industrial countries knew no fatherland. As to the classical tradition itself, the instruction of Alfred Marshall, partly through his Principles of Economics, was now without any challenge in England. The chapter first considers money and banking during the period before discussing issues pertaining to monopolies and competition. It also looks at some important developments that influenced economic attitudes and policy during the period, including the October Revolution of 1917 in Russia and the migration of economists from Poland, Hungary, Austria and Romania to the West, where they would dominate economic discussions in the years ahead.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Dániel, Luka. "Teaching Land Law: Controversy and Land Policy in Hungary from 1948 to 1968." In Different Approaches to Economic and Social Changes: New Research Issues, Sources and Results, 146–57. Working Group of Economic and Social History Regional Committee of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences in Pécs, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.15170/seshst-02-13.

Full text
Abstract:
Topic of the study. During the harsh Stalinization from 1948 agriculture had to be collectivized while land was not nationalized by decree as the Bolsheviks did in Russia in 1917. The Soviet legal system was a pattern for jurists but the differences made the transition to “socialism” more rugged and controversial. The legal scholars had to interpret a situation which had to develop further to full “socialization”. In order to do that, a “cooperative law” and a “land law” had to be created and taught as part of “agricultural law”. Research questions and methods. Land law consisted of regulations regarding private farmers and collective agricultural producers (cooperatives, state farms etc.), theoretically in the whole research period. How did the agrarian, cooperative and land policy affect legal theory on land tenure system? What kind of scientific dispute emerged on this matter and how did the attempts of codification of land law affect legal education? Various types of sources were evaluated, for instance protocols of council meetings of the faculty of law of two universities, archival sources, articles and studies from authors who taught land law and took part in its debate and codification. Results and conclusions. Law was used as a tool to boost transformation, and the lawmakers and jurists faced a paradox situation in which there was a need of codification of land law and to make it independent from other branches of law. On the one hand, jurists argued like Gyula Eörsi and Miklós Világhy that civil law had primatus in the legal system and property relations had to be included in that part of legislation during the “transition period”. On the other hand, many jurists, for instance Iván Földes, Imre Seres claimed that cooperative law or/and land law were separated branches of law despite the fact that mass collectivization was not completed until the spring of 1961.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Leonard, Carol Scott. "Rational Resistance to Land Privatization: The Behaviour of Russia’s Rural Producers in Response to Agrarian Reforms, 1861–2000." In The Economic Future in Historical Perspective. British Academy, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197263471.003.0009.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter analyses rural opposition to land privatization in the post-Soviet transition era that draws explicit parallels with the resistance by Russian peasants to early twentieth-century government programmes of land reform. It focuses on the failure of the effort to extend the policy of privatization to farmland, and the collapse of marketed output from the agricultural sector's large koholz units.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Pollock, Ethan. "Either Socialism Will Defeat the Louse or the Louse Will Defeat Socialism." In Without the Banya We Would Perish, 129–56. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195395488.003.0007.

Full text
Abstract:
In as much as the banya was associated with the Russian peasantry and urban decadence, Bolsheviks disdained it. But as a tool of modern hygiene, the banya was unassailable. Workers demanded accessible, affordable, and well-maintained bathhouses. After the revolution of 1917, the Soviet state committed to providing them. During the Russian Civil War, the prevalence of epidemics (typhus, relapsing fever) only increased the pressure on the new state to provide people with the means to clean themselves in banyas. During War Communism banyas came under municipal control and were expected to provide access to the lower classes; under the New Economic Policy of the 1920s, they re-emerged as commercial enterprises. But as satires by Zoshchenko and the commentary of others made plain, the conditions in Soviet banyas remained abysmal, a far cry from the idealized banyas of popular imagination.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Russia – Economic policy – 1861-1917"

1

Norovsambuu, Khishigt, Leonid Kuras, and Bazar Tsybenov. "From Intelligence to the Beginning of Revolutionary Cooperation: the Evolution of Russian Policy in Respect of Mongolia (1905–1918)." In Irkutsk Historical and Economic Yearbook 2021. Baikal State University, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.17150/978-5-7253-3040-3.43.

Full text
Abstract:
The article is devoted to the evolution of the policy of the Russian Empire and Soviet Russia on the issue of Mongolia. The period under study begins with the Russo-Japanese War at the beginning of the 20th century and ends with the attempts of Soviet Russia to establish relations with Mongolia in 1917–1918. The authors analyzed in detail the military-intelligence, diplomatic and revolutionary aspects of Russian politics in Mongolia. The article also examines the question of the probable meeting in 1917 of Mongolian representatives with the revolutionaries of the Central Executive Committee of Soviet power in Siberia and the Siberian Bureau of the Central Committee of the Russian Communist Party (Bolsheviks).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Voronkova, D. "Comparative analysis of the topics of publications of the journal «Bulletin of Finance, Industry and Trade» for 1913 and 1917." In Historical research in the context of data science: Information resources, analytical methods and digital technologies. LLC MAKS Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.29003/m1785.978-5-317-06529-4/25-32.

Full text
Abstract:
The reflection of the economic situation in 1913 and 1917 in the official press organ of the Ministry of Finance – «Bulletin of Finance, industry and trade» may be interesting to both historians and economists. The journal is a valuable source on a wide range of issues in Russian economic history. The article provides a comparative thematic analysis of the journal materials using quantitative methods. For this purpose, the author relies, among other things, on the quarterly “Systematic lists of articles” and the bibliographic database created at NSU in 2005. The best way to present changes in the priorities of the editorial policy of the journal is to refer to the quarterly dynamics of the topics of analytical articles and reports.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Voronkova, D. "Comparative analysis of the topics of publications of the journal «Bulletin of Finance, Industry and Trade» for 1913 and 1917." In Historical research in the context of data science: Information resources, analytical methods and digital technologies. LLC MAKS Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.29003/m1785.978-5-317-06529-4/25-32.

Full text
Abstract:
The reflection of the economic situation in 1913 and 1917 in the official press organ of the Ministry of Finance – «Bulletin of Finance, industry and trade» may be interesting to both historians and economists. The journal is a valuable source on a wide range of issues in Russian economic history. The article provides a comparative thematic analysis of the journal materials using quantitative methods. For this purpose, the author relies, among other things, on the quarterly “Systematic lists of articles” and the bibliographic database created at NSU in 2005. The best way to present changes in the priorities of the editorial policy of the journal is to refer to the quarterly dynamics of the topics of analytical articles and reports.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Russia – Economic policy – 1861-1917' for particular source types:
Journal articles Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography