Academic literature on the topic 'Right and left (Political science) – Great Britain'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Right and left (Political science) – Great Britain.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Right and left (Political science) – Great Britain"
Williams, John P. "Oh Britannia: Great Britain’s Exit from the European Union and Its Impact on Globalism and Nationalism." Perspectives on Global Development and Technology 20, no. 1-2 (March 25, 2021): 186–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15691497-12341590.
Full textMyazin, Nikolai. "Street right-wing radical groups in Great Britain." Contemporary Europe, no. 2 (April 9, 2014): 81–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/soveurope220148190.
Full textHayter, P. D. G. "The Parliamentary Monitoring of Science and Technology in Britain." Government and Opposition 26, no. 2 (April 1, 1991): 147–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.1991.tb01130.x.
Full textFrazer, Elizabeth. "Citizenship Education: Anti-Political Culture and Political Education in Britain." Political Studies 48, no. 1 (March 2000): 88–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00252.
Full textBolshakov, A. "Regulatory Autonomy of Great Britain: Problems and Perspectives." World Economy and International Relations 65, no. 7 (2021): 71–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-7-71-79.
Full textNagel, Jack H., and Christopher Wlezien. "Centre-Party Strength and Major-Party Divergence in Britain, 1945–2005." British Journal of Political Science 40, no. 2 (March 24, 2010): 279–304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0007123409990111.
Full textRouban, Luc. "The uncertainty of French political life: the shift to the right and the crisis of representative democracy." Urgent Problems of Europe, no. 3 (2021): 188–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.31249/ape/2021.03.08.
Full textSteenbergen, Marco R., and Tomasz Siczek. "Better the devil you know? Risk-taking, globalization and populism in Great Britain." European Union Politics 18, no. 1 (January 29, 2017): 119–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1465116516681858.
Full textJames, Malcolm, and Sivamohan Valluvan. "Coronavirus Conjuncture: Nationalism and Pandemic States." Sociology 54, no. 6 (December 2020): 1238–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038520969114.
Full textMcALEER, G. J. "Red Tory: How Left and Right Have Broken Britain and How We Can Fix It." Perspectives on Political Science 40, no. 1 (January 13, 2011): 58–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10457097.2011.536739.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Right and left (Political science) – Great Britain"
KARREMANS, Johannes. "State interests vs citizens’ preferences : on which side do (Labour) parties stand?" Doctoral thesis, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/45985.
Full textExamining Board: Professor Pepper Culpepper, formerly EUI/University of Oxford (Supervisor); Professor Hanspeter Kriesi, EUI (Co-Supervisor); Professor Ferdinand Müller-Rommel, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg; Professor Maurits Van der Veen, College of William & Mary
This dissertation deals with the question of how the partisan nature of government still matters in the current globalized and post-industrial world. In particular, it compares the representativeness of two contemporary centre-left governments with that of two centre-left executives from the 1970s in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. According to the more provocative theories about the state of contemporary representative democracy, these countries should be forerunners of a general European trend in which governments care more about technical competence rather than political representation and responsiveness. These tendencies are expected to particularly affect the partisanship of Labour ministers. In order to test these theories, I do a comparative content analysis of how Labour finance ministers/Chancellors justify the yearly government budget in front of the parliament. The justifications are divided into those that characterize the government as representative of the partisan redistributive preferences (input-justifications) VS those that profile it as a competent caretaker of public finances (output-justifications). Following the above-mentioned theories, the hypothesis is that today the output-justifications are more important than in the past. As this approach is relatively novel with regards to the study of responsiveness, the thesis also dedicates one chapter to the justification strategies of a technical and a neoliberal government. The purpose of this extra comparison is to have more empirical evidence of what renders an output-justification different from an input-justification. By incorporating these two cases, thus, I get a deeper comparative insight into what is a typical left-wing/partisan discourse characteristic and what constitutes governmental/institutional talk. This extra comparison, consequently, allows me to reflect more deeply on the findings emerging from the overtime comparison of Labour governments. The findings of my research tell a two-sided story. On the one hand, contrary to my hypothesis, the contemporary cases feature slightly more input-justifications than the governments from the 1970s. On the other, the logic of the discourses suggests that, while in the 1970s the responsiveness to social needs was presented as a policy goal per se, today the input-justifications tend to be more subordinated to justifications about economic and financial considerations. The findings thus speak both to theories according to which today we are not witnessing a decline of political representation, but simply a change in kind, as well to the theories speaking of a gradual hollowing out of political competition. In the iv conclusion of my dissertation I reflect on what is right and wrong on the two sides of the debate.
Tijani, Hakeem Ibikunle. "Britain and the development of leftist ideology and organisations in West Africa: the Nigerian experience, 1945-1965." Thesis, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/2025.
Full textHistory
D.Litt. et Phil. (History)
Books on the topic "Right and left (Political science) – Great Britain"
1926-, Tivey Leonard James, and Wright Anthony 1948-, eds. Party ideology in Britain. London: Routledge, 1989.
Find full textBritish political ideologies. New York: Philip Allan, 1991.
Find full textThe broken compass: How left and right lost their meaning. London: Continuum, 2009.
Find full textHitchens, Peter. The broken compass: How left and right lost their meaning. London: Continuum, 2009.
Find full textBarry, Hindess, ed. Reactions to the right. London: Routledge, 1990.
Find full text1963-, Lawson Neal, and Sherlock Neil 1963-, eds. The progressive century: The future of the centre-left in Britain. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: PALGRAVE, 2001.
Find full textProtest vote: Why UKIP is taking votes from the left and right. London: Gibson Square, 2015.
Find full text6, Perri. On the right lines: The next centre-right in the British Isles. London: Demos, 1998.
Find full textThe Conservative Party and the extreme right, 1945-75. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2011.
Find full textNew right, new racism: Race and reaction in the United States and Britain. Washington Square, N.Y: New York University Press, 1997.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Right and left (Political science) – Great Britain"
Jones, Stephen. "10. Realist criminology and victims." In Criminology. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198768968.003.0010.
Full textJones, Stephen. "10. Realist criminology and victims." In Criminology, 209–27. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198860891.003.0010.
Full textRiehle, Kevin. "Yezhovshchina-Era Defectors, 1937–1940." In Soviet Defectors, 45–99. Edinburgh University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474467230.003.0003.
Full textHardy, Lawrence Harold. "A History of Computer Networking Technology." In Encyclopedia of Multimedia Technology and Networking, Second Edition, 613–18. IGI Global, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-014-1.ch082.
Full textHardy, Lawrence Harold. "A History of Computer Networking Technology." In Networking and Telecommunications, 26–32. IGI Global, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-986-1.ch003.
Full text"distrust of the intellectual, typical of British art circles, and other factors of British theatrical life, has led to the assumption by many that to ‘think’ about performing will inhibit the ‘feeling’ necessary to the creative act. To cap it all, of course, Brecht actually set himself against naturalism as a style or intent, and thus (or so many practitioners assumed for some time) also set himself against the development of a clear emotional line in performance – another black mark for him from a theatre that prided itself on its ability to ‘move’ an audience by a truthful display of deep sentiment. The great British actor Alec Guinness wrote in 1949 in answer to an article by Brecht on acting: I find his theories cut right across the very nature of the actor, substituting some cerebral process for the instinctive and traditional accumulation of centuries . . . I believe in the mystery and illusion of the theatre which Brecht seems to despise. And yet the part of the British theatrical tradition that is built on the performing of Shakespeare so often brings the performer very close to Brechtian notions of theatre. Brecht’s own generous accolade to the bard – that his was a truly epic form – is a strong testimony here; and as many practitioners acknowledge (and are quoted in subsequent chapters of this book), the natural inclination of British actors towards ironic story-telling, so familiar to us from Shakespeare, makes them easy converts to Brechtian practice. Until the mid-1950s, only among a small band of left-wing enthusiasts was Brecht’s work actively supported in Britain. The great boost to the development of a public for the play-wright came from the first visit to London by his company, the Berliner Ensemble, in 1956 – shortly, that is, after his death. Since the Berliner performed in German, it is not surprising that the major impact they had was on ‘theatrical style’, on the visual and physical aspects of production, rather than on thematic content. A number of British directors and designers were immediately struck by the bareness and simplicity of the company’s staging, the careful detail lavished on and produced in costumes and props, and the robust clarity and exuberance of the acting. These responses led to a small crop of British productions of Brecht plays in the late 1950s and early 1960s, but these received somewhat mixed reviews. The feeling persisted that there was something wrong with the plays themselves, acceptability of which was certainly not helped by the difficulties of translating Brecht’s specialised verbal language. The archaic words and phrases, unusual rhythms, poetic word order, and so on, proved, and continue to prove, a challenge to any translator. And the early British productions of Brecht appeared to suffer from either an over-fidelity to ‘Brechtianism’ as understood by the performers, or from a lack of understanding of the essential combination in Brecht of socio-political meaning and theatrical fun. Even critics who admired these early productions sometimes felt (and declared) that they had to overlook or ignore Brecht’s politics in order to enjoy the performance." In Performing Brecht, 14. Routledge, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203129838-10.
Full text