Academic literature on the topic 'Revocazione'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Contents
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Revocazione.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Revocazione"
Dutto, Laura. "Le sentenze di condanna Cedu e la loro esecuzione: la Corte Costituzionale esclude la revocazione della sentenza di adottabilità e suscita qualche riflessione sul mantenimento dei rapporti dopo l'adozione." MINORIGIUSTIZIA, no. 4 (March 2019): 205–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/mg2018-004022.
Full textGuacci, Carmencita. "Le impugnazioni incidentali nel processo amministrativo italiano." Revista de Derecho de la UNED (RDUNED), no. 12 (January 1, 2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/rduned.12.2013.11698.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Revocazione"
Sarragioto, Giorgia <1989>. "LA REVOCAZIONE DELLE SENTENZE TRIBUTARIE." Master's Degree Thesis, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/10579/4965.
Full textROMANI, ELISABETTA. "L'ESECUZIONE DELLE SENTENZE DELLA CORTE EDU NEL SISTEMA PROCESSUALE AMMINISTRATIVO E LA CERTEZZA DEL DIRITTO." Doctoral thesis, Università degli Studi di Milano, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/2434/829899.
Full textThe phenomenon of multilevel jurisdictions has been progressively caused a decreasing of the effectiveness of the res judicata, thus overcoming the traditional view anchored to the principle of intangibility and, therefore, affecting the value of legal certainty. From the dynamism of the protection of human rights, administrative procedural law could not be excluded, which had to deal with the problem concerning the enforcement of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “ECtHR”), which modify, totally or partially, the statement declared on a national level by an Administrative Court or by the State Council. Therefore, a conflict between administrative national rulings and rulings of the ECtHR is reasonably possible, thanks to the subsidiarity principle and to the rule provided by Article no. 35 of the European Convention of Human Rights (hereinafter “ECHR”). With particular reference to an administrative res judicata in violation of ECHR, the full enforcement of a ruling by the ECtHR is an issue characterized by absolute relevance, as also demonstrated by the recent rulings of the Italian Constitutional Court no. 123/2017 and no. 19/2018. Such constitutional question regards the execution of the decisum stated by the ECtHR in Mottola and others v. Italy, Staibano and others v. Italy and Guadagno v. Italy. The administrative judges raised the issue of constitutionality, by means of which they suggested to introduce the reopening of domestic judicial proceeding, which cases in administrative procedural law are strictly defined and do not include the violation of ECHR and of ECtHR’s case-law. The Constitutional Court ruled that the question concerning the constitutionality of Article no. 106 of Code of Administrative Procedure, raised with reference to Articles no. 117, § 1 of the Constitution and no. 46 of the ECHR, was unfounded. These decisions show that in the Italian legal system there is nowadays no legal remedy for the implementation of supranational law if there is a domestic res judicata, bringing out a gap in the enforcement. In particular, the question that we have to answer is as follows: Which value should prevail? On the one hand, there is the protection of human rights and the tendency to enhance substantial justice, even overcoming legal instruments as the res judicata, and on the other there is the principle of legal certainty, which hide the will to defend the national sovereignty. With particular reference to the administrative proceedings, such balancing is made even more complex by the need to ensure respect for the right of defense (Article no. 24 of the Italian Constitution) of third parties and for their legitimate expectations and reliance on legal certainty. In the ECtHR system, third parties do not have a right to participate in the judgment before ECtHR, despite the fact they have taken part in the domestic proceeding and, thus, they are influenced by the res judicata. The main purpose of the paper is to demonstrate that all arguments of the Constitutional Court can be overcome and to propose possible solutions, which allow the domestic legal system to carry out what has been stated by the ECtHR and to protect its effectiveness. This will avoid that the intangibility of the res judicata could result in a violation of the fundamental rights and values protected by the ECHR system.
Books on the topic "Revocazione"
Vignarelli, Andrea Colli. La revocazione delle sentenze tributarie. Bari: Cacucci, 2007.
Find full textNicoletti, Carlo Alberto. La revocazione della sentenza tra la decisione Corte cost. 17/86 e la responsabilità del giudice. Milano: A. Giuffrè, 1988.
Find full text