Academic literature on the topic 'Review of Commonwealth Functions (Australia)'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Review of Commonwealth Functions (Australia).'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Review of Commonwealth Functions (Australia)"
Smith, Graeme C. "The Future of Consultation–Liaison Psychiatry." Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 37, no. 2 (April 2003): 150–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1614.2003.01136.x.
Full textO'Neil, Allan. "Coutts v Commonwealth of Australia." Federal Law Review 16, no. 2 (June 1986): 212–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0067205x8601600204.
Full textGow, Lyn, John Balla, Judy Hall, Deslea Konza, and Dianne Snow. "Towards Effective Integration in Australia." Australasian Journal of Special Education 10, no. 2 (November 1986): 14–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1030011200021588.
Full textSmith, S. J. "ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 2000." APPEA Journal 41, no. 2 (2001): 80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/aj00055.
Full textHowe, Anna L. "Health care costs of an aging population: the case of Australia." Reviews in Clinical Gerontology 7, no. 4 (November 1997): 359–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0959259897007491.
Full textTabor, Ala E. "A Review of Australian Tick Vaccine Research." Vaccines 9, no. 9 (September 16, 2021): 1030. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9091030.
Full textHeiden, K. "OVERVIEW AND REVIEW OF THE COMMONWEALTH ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AND BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ACT 1999." APPEA Journal 42, no. 1 (2002): 669. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/aj01043.
Full textPeiris, G. L. "The Administrative Appeals Tribunal of Australia: the first decade." Legal Studies 6, no. 3 (November 1986): 303–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121x.1986.tb00346.x.
Full textCarlberg, Ulf. "Review: Insects - a World of Diversity." Entomologica Fennica 6, no. 1 (January 1, 1995): 42. http://dx.doi.org/10.33338/ef.83838.
Full textKraal, Diane. "Review of Australia's Petroleum Resource Rent Tax: Implications from a Case Study of the Gorgon Gas Project." Federal Law Review 45, no. 2 (June 2017): 315–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0067205x1704500207.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Review of Commonwealth Functions (Australia)"
Roche, Vivienne Carol. "Razor gang to Dawkins : a history of Victoria College, an Australian College of Advanced Education." Connect to digital thesis, 2003. http://eprints.unimelb.edu.au/archive/00000468.
Full textArmstrong, Gillian Claire. "Administrative justice and tribunals in South Africa : a commonwealth comparison." Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/17997.
Full textENGLISH ABSTRACT: In the field of administrative law, the judiciary has traditionally exercised control over the administrative actions of the executive through judicial review. However, judicial review is neither the most effective nor the most efficient primary control mechanism for systemic administrative improvement. In a country faced with a task of =transformative constitutionalism‘, and hindered with scarce resources, there is good cause to limit judicial intervention as the first response to administrative disputes. The major theme of this thesis is to investigate the feasibility of administrative tribunal reform in South Africa, using two other commonwealth countries, Australia and England, as a basis for comparison. Australia and England have been chosen for comparison because they share similar administrative law traditions and they can provide working models of coherent tribunal structures. The Australian tribunal system is well-established and consists of tribunals which fall under the control of the executive, while tribunals in England have recently undergone a significant transformation, and are now part of the independent judiciary. The South African government currently spends, indeed wastes, a significant amount of money on administrative law litigation. Due to the limitations of judicial review, even after the high costs of litigation and the long duration of court proceedings, the results achieved may still be unsatisfactory. Furthermore, judicial review is unsuited to giving effect to systemic administrative change and the improvement of initial decision-making. Australia and England have begun to move away from the traditional court model for the resolution of administrative disputes. Both have indicated a preference for the important role of tribunals in the administration of disputes. Tribunals have been shown to offer the advantage of being speedier, cheaper, more efficient, more participatory and more accessible than traditional courts, which contributes to tribunals being a more available resource for lay people or people without sophisticated legal knowledge, and provides wider access to remedies than courts. The English and Australian models indicate a few important trends which need to be applied universally to ensure a sustained tribunal reform and a system which provides a higher level of administrative redress than the over-burdened and institutionally inept courts currently do. These include co-operation among government departments and tribunals; open and accountable systemic change; the need for supervision and evaluation of the whole of administrative law by an independent and competent body; and ultimately a focus on the needs of users of state services. At the same time, there are arguments against administrative tribunal reform. These include the costs of reform; the ways to establish tribunals; and the level of independence shown by the tribunals. These arguments are especially relevant in the South African context, where the government faces huge social problems and a scarcity of resources. However, after an analysis of the valuable characteristics of tribunals and the role that they serve in the day to day administration of justice, it is difficult to see how these objections to tribunals can outweigh their potential importance in the administrative justice system. The need for sustained systematic reform in South Africa is one that cannot be ignored. Tribunals offer a valuable alternative to judicial review for the resolution of administrative disputes. Furthermore, the tribunal systems of Australia and England demonstrate how the effective creation and continued use of comprehensive tribunal structures contributes firstly to cost reduction and secondly to ease the administrative burden on courts who are not suited to cure large-scale administrative error.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: In die administratiefreg oefen die regsprekende gesag tradisioneel beheer uit oor die uitvoerende gesag deur middel van geregtelike hersiening. Geregtelike hersiening is egter nie die mees doeltreffende of effektiewe primêre beheermeganisme om sistemiese administratiewe verbetering teweeg te bring nie. In 'n land met die uitdagings van 'transformatiewe konstitusionalisme‘ en skaars hulpbronne, kan 'n goeie argument gevoer word dat geregtelike inmenging as die eerste antwoord op administratiewe dispute beperk moet word. Die deurlopende tema van hierdie tesis is 'n ondersoek na die lewensvatbaarheid van hervorming van administratiewe tribunale in Suid-Afrika, in vergelyking met die posisie in Australië en Engeland, waarvan beide ook, tesame met Suid-Afrika, deel vorm van die Statebond. Hierdie lande is gekies vir regsvergelykende studie aangesien hulle 'n administratiefregtelike tradisie met Suid-Afrika deel en beide werkende modelle van duidelike tribunale strukture daarstel. Die Australiese tribunale stelsel is goed gevestig en bestaan uit tribunale onder die beheer van die uitvoerende gesag, terwyl die tribunale stelsel in Engeland onlangs 'n beduidende hervorming ondergaan het en nou deel van die onafhanklike regsprekende gesag is. Die Suid-Afrikaanse regering mors aansienlike hoeveelhede geld op administratiefregtelike litigasie. Selfs na hoë koste en lang vertragings van litigasie mag die resultate steeds onbevredigend wees as gevolg van die beperkings inherent aan geregtelike hersiening. Tesame met hierdie oorwegings is geregtelike hersiening ook nie gerig op sistemiese administratiewe verandering en verbetering van aanvanklike besluitneming nie. Australië en Engeland het onlangs begin wegbeweeg van die tradisionele hof-gebaseerde model vir die oplossing van administratiewe dispute. Beide toon 'n voorkeur vir die belangrike rol wat tribunale in die administrasie van dispute kan speel Tribunale bied die bewese voordele om vinniger, goedkoper, meer doeltreffend, meer deelnemend en meer toeganklik te wees as tradisionele howe, sodat tribunale 'n meer beskikbare hulpbron is vir leke, oftewel, persone sonder gesofistikeerde regskennis en dus beter toegang tot remedies as tradisionele howe verskaf. Die Engelse en Australiese modelle dui op enkele belangrike tendense wat universeel toegepas moet word om volgehoue tribunale hervorming te verseker en om =n stelsel te skep wat 'n hoër vlak van administratiewe geregtigheid daarstel as wat oorlaaide en institusioneel onbekwame howe kan. Dit verwys bepaald na samewerking tussen staatsdepartemente en tibunale; deursigtige en verantwoordbare sistemiese veranderinge; die behoefte aan toesighouding en evaluasie van die hele administratiefreg deur 'n onafhanklike, bevoegde liggaam; en uiteindelik 'n fokus op die behoeftes van die gebruikers van staatsdienste. Daar is egter terselfdertyd ook argumente teen administratiewe tribunale hervorming. Hierdie argumente sluit in die koste van hervorming; die wyses waarop tribunale gevestig word; en die vlak van onafhanklikheid voorgehou deur tribunale. Hierdie argumente is veral relevant in die Suid-Afrikaanse konteks waar die regering voor groot sosiale probleme te staan kom en daarby ingesluit, 'n tekort aan hulpbronne ook moet hanteer. Daarenteen is dit moeilik om in te sien hoe enige teenkanting en teenargumente met betrekking tot die vestiging van administratiewe tribunale swaarder kan weeg as die potensiële belang van sulke tribunale in die administratiewe geregtigheidstelsel, veral nadat 'n analise van die waardevolle karaktereienskappe van tribunale en die rol wat hulle speel in die dag-tot-dag administrasie van geregtigheid onderneem is. Die behoefte aan volhoubare sistemiese hervorming in Suid-Afrika kan nie geïgnoreer word nie. Tribunale bied 'n waardevolle alternatief tot geregtelike hersiening met die oog op die oplossing van administratiewe dispute. Tesame hiermee demonstreer die tribunale stelsels in Australië en Engeland hoe die doeltreffende vestiging en deurlopende gebruik van omvattende tribunale bydra, eerstens om kostes verbonde aan die oplossing van administratiewe dispute te verlaag en tweedens, om die administratiewe las op die howe, wat nie aangelê is daarvoor om grootskaalse administratiewe foute reg te stel nie, te verlig.
Books on the topic "Review of Commonwealth Functions (Australia)"
Administration, Australia Parliament Senate Standing Committee on Finance and Public. Review of the Office of the Commonwealth Ombudsman. Canberra: Australian Govt. Pub. Service, 1992.
Find full textAustralia. Business Regulation Review Unit. Report of an inquiry into food regulation in Australia: Business Regulation Review Unit, Commonwealth of Australia [and] Regulation Review Unit, Government of Victoria. [Australia: s.n., 1988.
Find full textCommission, Australia Law Reform. The judicial power of the Commonwealth: A review of the Judiciary Act 1903 and related legislation. Sydney: Australian Law Reform Commission, 2001.
Find full textCommittee, Australia Attorney-General's Dept Review. Review of Commonwealth criminal law: Interim report, Computer crime. Canberra: Australian Govt. Publishing Service, 1988.
Find full textCommittee, Australia Attorney-General's Dept Review. Review of Commonwealth Criminal Law: Fifth interim report, June 1991. Canberra: Australian Govt. Pub. Service, 1991.
Find full textAustralia. Attorney-General's Dept. Review Committee. Review of Commonwealth criminal law: Interim report : Detention before charge. Canberra: Australian Govt. Publishing Service, 1989.
Find full textWestern Australia. Tertiary Institutions Governance Committe. Senates and councils of tertiary institutions in Western Australia: Review of structures and functions : report of the Tertiary Institutions Governance Committee. Perth: The Committee?, 1986.
Find full textNew, Zealand Parliament Foreign Affairs Defence and Trade Committee. Treaty scrutiny: A ten-year review : Joint Standing Committee on Treaties, Commonwealth of Australia : report of the Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee. [Wellington, N.Z.]: Published under the authority of the House of Representatives, 2006.
Find full textCrowl, Linda, Susan Fisher, Elizabeth Webby, and Lydia Wevers. Newspapers and Journals. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199679775.003.0037.
Full textAustralia. Review of Commonwealth criminal law: Final report (Parliamentary paper / the Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia). Australian Government Pub. Service, 1991.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Review of Commonwealth Functions (Australia)"
Lynch, Gordon. "‘If We Were Untrammelled by Precedent…’: Pursuing Gradual Reform in Child Migration, 1954–1961." In UK Child Migration to Australia, 1945-1970, 243–97. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69728-0_7.
Full textBulmer, W. Elliot. "The Crown, Prime Minister and Government." In Westminster and the World, 111–34. Policy Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529200621.003.0007.
Full textCalabresi, Steven Gow. "The Commonwealth of Australia." In The History and Growth of Judicial Review, Volume 1, 229–62. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190075774.003.0007.
Full textSusan, Kiefel. "Part IV Practice and Process, Ch.21 Standards of Review in Constitutional Review of Legislation." In The Oxford Handbook of the Australian Constitution. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198738435.003.0022.
Full textFinlayson, C. Max, Rudolph S. de Groot, Francine M. R. Hughes, and Caroline A. Sullivan. "Freshwater Ecosystem Services and Functions." In Freshwater Ecology and Conservation, 321–37. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198766384.003.0015.
Full textFiona, Wheeler. "Part VII Rights, Ch.38 Due Process." In The Oxford Handbook of the Australian Constitution. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198738435.003.0039.
Full textGottschalk, Petter. "IS/IT Outsourcing." In E-Business Strategy, Sourcing and Governance, 159–70. IGI Global, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-004-2.ch009.
Full text"television programme, Lost in Space (Channel 2), screened on September 2, 1992, cites a British emigrant relocated, and unemployed, in an outer Brisbane suburb, blaming Neighbours for having misled him to Australia. The third difference pits Australian egalitarianism against British class hierarchies. The myth of Australia as egalitarian circulates widely in the UK as well as in Australia. It readily enables an elision of any working-class or unemployed populations. That elision was literally as well as metaphorically bought by Barry Brown, BBC Head of Purchased Programmes: “There isn’t a class system in Australia – or, if you like, everyone in Australia is middle class” (quoted by Tyrer 1987). In this way, Neighbours can focus British viewers’ notions that there is a safe, middle-class/classless suburban heaven down under. Wholesome neighborliness is highly pertinent here. Peter Pinne, executive producer of Neighbours, is quoted as ascribing its success to the fact that “it provides a vision of something that is lacking in the personal lives of many people in Britain today, particularly a sense of personal commitment and caring in the community” (Solomon 1989). The fourth difference concerns Australian accent and idiom, and their differences from British English. Acceptability of these differences has been facilitated not only by the steady succession of Australian television and film product screened in the UK since the early 1970s, but also within UK television production by the growing recognition of regional and ethnic accents since the early 1960s first moves away from plummy upper-class enunciation. Thus when “bludger” is noted in a Daily Telegraph (February 2, 1988) review as not being understood, it is not a matter of criticism or condescension, as in some reviews of Crocodile Dundee (see Crofts 1992: 210–220). The opening of the review indicates a ready acceptance of difference: “‘I was just goin’ to put the nosebag on. Fancy a bit of tucker yourself?’ This is the essential tone of Neighbours, BBC-1’s usually [sic] successful bought-in Australia soap. It is just quaintly foreign enough to please without confusing” (Marrin 1988). Of these four differences, then, between Australia and Britain, three (concerning the weather, suburbia, and egalitarianism) are virtually dissolved in that they enable the projection of British fantasies on to Neighbours. The last difference functions as a marker of cultural difference so familiar as to present no problems of assimilation. In sum, Neighbours’s huge success in the UK can therefore be traced in the three general categories of explanation set out above. Its ratings suggest beyond doubt that all of the general textual “success factors” of Neighbours apply in the UK; indeed, almost all have been commented on by British reviewers anxious to make sense of the “Neighbours phenomenon.” It is worth noting, second, that the institutional and cultural facilitators of Neighbours’s UK success are both very powerful, and also often historically fortuitous. Recall the opening up of daytime television on BBC1 and the expansion of tabloid coverage of television in 1986. Factors such as these are likely to escape the most assiduous attentions of program producers and buyers, as well as of governmental cultural and trade agencies concerned with promoting." In To Be Continued..., 116. Routledge, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203131855-18.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Review of Commonwealth Functions (Australia)"
Linton, Valerie, Bente Helen Leinum, Robert Newton, and Olav Fyrileiv. "CO2SAFE-ARREST: A Full-Scale Burst Test Research Program for Carbon Dioxide Pipelines — Part 1: Project Overview and Outcomes of Test 1." In 2018 12th International Pipeline Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/ipc2018-78517.
Full textReports on the topic "Review of Commonwealth Functions (Australia)"
Playford, P. E. State and Commonwealth geoscience agencies in Australia: their roles and functions. Natural Resources Canada/ESS/Scientific and Technical Publishing Services, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.4095/193512.
Full textMcKenna, Patrick, and Mark Evans. Emergency Relief and complex service delivery: Towards better outcomes. Queensland University of Technology, June 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.5204/rep.eprints.211133.
Full textGOVERNORS & SENIOR PERSONNEL - Hugh Traill Armitage - Memorandum ? Scope of Functions of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia. Reserve Bank of Australia, September 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.47688/rba_archives_2006/03022.
Full textCommonwealth Bank of Australia - Head Office cnr Pitt Street & Martin Place - Staff Social Functions - Reception at opening of new premises - 23 August 1916 (plate 788). Reserve Bank of Australia, March 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.47688/rba_archives_pn-001433.
Full textStaff - Social functions - Groups - Head Office - Commonwealth Bank of Australia - Staff reunion in honour of the return of members of the A.I.F. from Active Service held at Clifton Gardens - Mr Hulle and Mr Armitage in the golf putting competition. Reserve Bank of Australia, September 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.47688/rba_archives_pn-016042.
Full text