Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Retrospective Reporting / Journal articles

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Retrospective Reporting.

Journal articles on the topic 'Retrospective Reporting'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 18 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Retrospective Reporting.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

van Gog, Tamara, Fred Paas, Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer, and Puk Witte. "Uncovering the Problem-Solving Process: Cued Retrospective Reporting Versus Concurrent and Retrospective Reporting." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 11, no. 4 (2005): 237–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1076-898x.11.4.237.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Muresan, Diana. ""Retrospective Of Financial Reporting On Capital Market "." Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica 2, no. 14 (December 31, 2012): 395–402. http://dx.doi.org/10.29302/oeconomica.2012.14.2.8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Van den Bergh, Omer, and Marta Walentynowicz. "Accuracy and bias in retrospective symptom reporting." Current Opinion in Psychiatry 29, no. 5 (September 2016): 302–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/yco.0000000000000267.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Guzzo, Karen Benjamin, and Sarah R. Hayford. "Revisiting Retrospective Reporting of First-Birth Intendedness." Maternal and Child Health Journal 18, no. 9 (March 7, 2014): 2141–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-014-1462-7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Treece, Amanda L., Margaret L. Gulley, Patricia Vasalos, Cherie Paquette, Neal I. Lindeman, Lawrence J. Jennings, and Angela N. Bartley. "Reporting Results of Molecular Tests: A Retrospective Examination of BRAF Mutation Reporting." Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 141, no. 5 (March 13, 2017): 658–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2016-0280-cp.

Full text

Abstract:

Context.— With enormous growth in the field of molecular pathology, the reporting of results gleaned from this testing is essential to guide patient care. Objective.— To examine molecular reports from laboratories participating in proficiency testing for required elements to convey molecular laboratory test results to clinicians and patients. Design.— Molecular laboratories participating in the College of American Pathologists (CAP) proficiency testing program for BRAF mutation analysis were solicited to submit examples of final reports from 2 separate proficiency testing reporting cycles. Reports were reviewed for the presence or absence of relevant components. Results.— A total of 107 evaluable reports were received (57 demonstrating a positive result for the BRAF V600E mutation and 50 negative). Methods for BRAF testing varied, with 95% (102 of 107) of reports adequately describing their assay methods and 87% (93 of 107) of reports adequately describing the target(s) of their assays. Information on the analytic sensitivity of the assay was present in 74% (79 of 107) of reports and 83% (89 of 107) reported at least 1 assay limitation, though only 34% (36 of 107) reported on variants not detected by their assays. Analytic and clinical interpretive comments were included in 99% (106 of 107) and 90% (96 of 107) of reports, respectively. Of participants that perform a laboratory-developed test, 88% (88 of 100) included language addressing the development of the assay. Conclusions.— Laboratories participating in BRAF proficiency testing through the CAP are including most of the required reporting elements to unambiguously convey molecular results. Laboratories should continue to strive to report these results in a concise and comprehensive manner.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Zhuk, Valeriy. "Integrated Reporting: A Retrospective and Perspective in Ukraine." Accounting and Finance, no. 1(83) (2019): 20–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.33146/2307-9878-2019-1(83)-20-27.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Parker, G., and J. Crawford. "Atypical depression: retrospective self-reporting of treatment effectiveness." Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 120, no. 3 (September 2009): 213–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01376.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Lazic, Stefan. "Errors in radiology – does reporting speed matter? A retrospective analysis of discrepancy reporting times." Clinical Radiology 75 (December 2020): e6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2020.11.030.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Silber, Gregory K., Jeffrey D. Adams, Michael J. Asaro, Timothy V. N. Cole, Katie S. Moore, Leslie I. Ward-Geiger, and Barbara J. Zoodsma. "The right whale mandatory ship reporting system: a retrospective." PeerJ 3 (March 31, 2015): e866. http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.866.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Bar-Oz, Benjamin, Myla E. Moretti, Guy Mareels, TonyVan Tittelboom, and Gideon Koren. "Reporting bias in retrospective ascertainment of drug-induced embryopathy." Lancet 354, no. 9191 (November 1999): 1700–1701. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04411-6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Krinsley, Karen E., James G. Gallagher, Frank W. Weathers, Catherine J. Kutter, and Danny G. Kaloupek. "Consistency of retrospective reporting about exposure to traumatic events." Journal of Traumatic Stress 16, no. 4 (August 2003): 399–409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1024474204233.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

McMurrich, Stephanie L., Sheri L. Johnson, and Andrew D. Peckham. "Situational Rumination: A Method for Minimizing Retrospective Reporting Bias." CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics 18, no. 1 (January 2012): 87–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-5949.2011.00279.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Walentynowicz, Marta, Ilse Van Diest, Filip Raes, and Omer Van den Bergh. "Retrospective symptom (over)reporting: The role of processing styles." Biological Psychology 129 (October 2017): 384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.08.047.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Capra, Miranda G. "Contemporaneous versus Retrospective User-Reported Critical Incidents in Usability Evaluation." Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 46, no. 24 (September 2002): 1973–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154193120204602408.

Full text

Abstract:

The user-reported critical incident technique involves end-users directly in qualitative data collection during formative usability evaluations. An augmented retrospective variation was developed where participants reported incidents while watching a recording of their usability session, rather than reporting incidents contemporaneous to their occurrence during task execution. Retrospective reporting enables controlled comparisons of user-reported and expert-reported methods, since session recordings can be shown to multiple reviewers. It also allows for the collection of incidents without disrupting traditional usability measures, such as time to complete task. A within-subject study with 24 participants found retrospective reporting to be similarly effective to contemporaneous reporting. The study is described and guidelines are provided for the use of both the contemporaneous and augmented retrospective techniques.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Mehmeti, Irsida, Silva Bino, Erida Nelaj, and Eugena Tomini. "AEFI Reporting Rates in Albania During 2008-2015: A Retrospective Analysis of AEFI Reporting Forms." European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 2, no. 4 (December 1, 2016): 62. http://dx.doi.org/10.26417/ejis.v2i4.p62-70.

Full text

Abstract:

In Albania, passive AEFI surveillance is conducted by Institute of Public Health, which is under the supervision of Ministry of Health. Reports of suspected adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) are reviewed by the Control of infectious disease department in the Institute of Public Health and recorded in a central database. In this study AEFI database is analysed for individual AEFI reporting forms during 2008-2015. AEFI reporting rates and their patterns were assessed. At 2003 a national standardized AEFI reporting form was introduced to the health-care workers who were obligated to report any observed AEFI. This form was changed and added more requisites in 2008 and nowadays this is the formal AEFI reporting form in Albania. Safe vaccines are essential to preserve high adherence to immunization programs¬ [1]. During the last years the reporting rate increased significantly due to implementation of enhanced vaccine safety reporting strategies but it is still low and underreporting remains one of the limits of passive surveillance. Reporting rates were calculated using as a denominator the administered doses of vaccines.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Mehmeti, Irsida, Silva Bino, Erida Nelaj, and Eugena Tomini. "AEFI Reporting Rates in Albania During 2008-2015: A Retrospective Analysis of AEFI Reporting Forms." European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 6, no. 1 (December 1, 2016): 62. http://dx.doi.org/10.26417/ejis.v6i1.p62-70.

Full text

Abstract:

In Albania, passive AEFI surveillance is conducted by Institute of Public Health, which is under the supervision of Ministry of Health. Reports of suspected adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) are reviewed by the Control of infectious disease department in the Institute of Public Health and recorded in a central database. In this study AEFI database is analysed for individual AEFI reporting forms during 2008-2015. AEFI reporting rates and their patterns were assessed. At 2003 a national standardized AEFI reporting form was introduced to the health-care workers who were obligated to report any observed AEFI. This form was changed and added more requisites in 2008 and nowadays this is the formal AEFI reporting form in Albania. Safe vaccines are essential to preserve high adherence to immunization programs¬ [1]. During the last years the reporting rate increased significantly due to implementation of enhanced vaccine safety reporting strategies but it is still low and underreporting remains one of the limits of passive surveillance. Reporting rates were calculated using as a denominator the administered doses of vaccines.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Colman, I., M. Kingsbury, Y. Garad, Y. Zeng, K. Naicker, S. Patten, P. B. Jones, T. C. Wild, and A. H. Thompson. "Consistency in adult reporting of adverse childhood experiences." Psychological Medicine 46, no. 3 (October 29, 2015): 543–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0033291715002032.

Full text

Abstract:

BackgroundMany studies have used retrospective reports to assess the long-term consequences of early life stress. However, current individual characteristics and experiences may bias the recall of these reports. In particular, depressed mood may increase the likelihood of recall of negative experiences. The aim of the study was to assess whether specific factors are associated with consistency in the reporting of childhood adverse experiences.MethodThe sample comprised 7466 adults from Canada's National Population Health Survey who had reported on seven childhood adverse experiences in 1994/1995 and 2006/2007. Logistic regression was used to explore differences between those who consistently reported adverse experiences and those whose reports were inconsistent.ResultsAmong those retrospectively reporting on childhood traumatic experiences in 1994/1995 and 2006/2007, 39% were inconsistent in their reports of these experiences. The development of depression, increasing levels of psychological distress, as well as increasing work and chronic stress were associated with an increasing likelihood of reporting a childhood adverse experience in 2006/2007 that had not been previously reported. Increases in mastery were associated with reduced likelihood of new reporting of a childhood adverse experience in 2006/2007. The development of depression and increases in chronic stress and psychological distress were also associated with reduced likelihood of ‘forgetting’ a previously reported event.ConclusionsConcurrent mental health factors may influence the reporting of traumatic childhood experiences. Studies that use retrospective reporting to estimate associations between childhood adversity and adult outcomes associated with mental health may be biased.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Andrade, Chittaranjan, SamirKumar Praharaj, Nachiketa Desai, Devavrat Harshe, and Sagar Karia. "Unmodified electroconvulsive therapy: Concerns about reporting in a retrospective study." Indian Journal of Psychiatry 59, no. 1 (2017): 125. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/psychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_62_17.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Grundfast, Kenneth M., Michael S. Morris, and Curtis Bernsley. "Subglottic Stenosis: Retrospective Analysis and Proposal for Standard Reporting System." Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology 96, no. 1 (January 1987): 101–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000348948709600123.

Full text

Abstract:

A retrospective analysis was undertaken reviewing management of 67 patients treated for subglottic stenosis (SGS) at the Children's Hospital National Medical Center (CHNMC) between 1980 and 1985. Forty-seven (90%) of the patients were followed for at least 18 months from the time diagnosis was made. Twenty-three (66%) of the patients followed for at least 18 months were successfully decannulated or had an adequate airway without tracheotomy. To compare efficacy of management of SGS at the CHNMC with management outcomes previously reported, a review of medical literature was undertaken and data from the most significant reports on management of SGS were collated and tabulated. Since analysis of published reports did not yield a consensus regarding optimal methods for management, and statistics in many published reports were absent or unclear, authors of the previously published reports were contacted personally by means of a letter and survey questionnaire. Results of the survey show that many authors have not performed a statistical review of their case data to determine relative efficacy of different surgical procedures. Thus, retrospective review of cases managed at the CHNMC as well as information obtained from leading experts in management of SGS indicate that there is no single optimal procedure or technique for management of all cases of SGS. Further, the way in which surgical procedures for management of SGS are being reported makes difficult the process of meaningfully comparing results reported by different surgeons. a reporting system is proposed that uses specific terms and objective parameters.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Clark, David W. J., and I. Ralph Edwards. "Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting and Retrospective Phenotyping for Oxidation Polymorphism." Medical Toxicology 3, no. 3 (June 1988): 241–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf03259884.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Axinn, William G., Stephanie Chardoul, Heather Gatny, Dirgha J. Ghimire, Jordan W. Smoller, Yang Zhang, and Kate M. Scott. "Using life history calendars to improve measurement of lifetime experience with mental disorders." Psychological Medicine 50, no. 3 (March 11, 2019): 515–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0033291719000394.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractBackgroundRetrospective reports of lifetime experience with mental disorders greatly underestimate the actual experiences of disorder because recall error biases reporting of earlier life symptoms downward. This fundamental obstacle to accurate reporting has many adverse consequences for the study and treatment of mental disorders. Better tools for accurate retrospective reporting of mental disorder symptoms have the potential for broad scientific benefits.MethodsWe designed a life history calendar (LHC) to support this task, and randomized more than 1000 individuals to each arm of a retrospective diagnostic interview with and without the LHC. We also conducted a careful validation with the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition.ResultsResults demonstrate that—just as with frequent measurement longitudinal studies—use of an LHC in retrospective measurement can more than double reports of lifetime experience of some mental disorders.ConclusionsThe LHC significantly improves retrospective reporting of mental disorders. This tool is practical for application in both large cross-sectional surveys of the general population and clinical intake of new patients.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

T., Padmavathi, and Rajavel Murugan P. "Individual case safety reports by nursing staff: a retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis." International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology 7, no. 10 (September 24, 2018): 1895. http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20183919.

Full text

Abstract:

Background: The burden of adverse drug reactions is high and accounts for considerable morbidity which can be prevented if healthcare professionals have proper knowledge. Early and spontaneous reporting of ADRs is the mainstay of pharmacovigilance program. Since staff nurses are closely involved in direct patient care, they can easily identify ADRs in the early stage. This study was done to assess the extent of participation of nurses in pharmacovigilance program in our institution.Methods: Retrospective observational study was conducted by analyzing the 210 Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSR) of 2years duration. Causality assessment in the ICSR was analyzed. Severity of the reactions was categorized into mild, moderate and severe according to Modified Hartwig and Siegel scale. Descriptive statistics were used.Results: There were 177 cases reported by faculties and 33 were by the staff nurses.19 nurses reported 33 adverse effects (1:1.7) whereas 41 faculties 177 events (1:4). On analyzing the severity of reactions, 188 cases were categorized as moderate (89.5%), 20 mild (9.5%) and 2 severe (1%). In moderate category of 188 reports, 82 % reporting was by faculties and 18% by staff nurses. All the 33 reports by nurses were of moderate category (100%). In the mild and severe category, 100% reporting was by faculties. Causality analysis showed that 194 were classified as probable (92%), 14 as Possible (7%) and 2as certain (1%). In probable category 85% of reporting was by faculties and 15% by nurses, in possible group 71 % by faculties and 29% by nurses and 100% by faculties in severe category.Conclusions: Training and dedicated participation of nurses can improve reporting of ICSR.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Hill, Laura G. "Back to the future: Considerations in use and reporting of the retrospective pretest." International Journal of Behavioral Development 44, no. 2 (October 21, 2019): 184–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0165025419870245.

Full text

Abstract:

Retrospective pretests ask respondents to report after an intervention on their aptitudes, knowledge, or beliefs before the intervention. A primary reason to administer a retrospective pretest is that in some situations, program participants may over the course of an intervention revise or recalibrate their prior understanding of program content, with the result that their posttest scores are lower than their traditional pretest scores, even though their understanding or abilities have increased. This phenomenon is called response-shift bias. The existence of response-shift bias is undisputed, but it does not always occur, and use of the retrospective pretest in place of a traditional pretest often introduces new problems. In this commentary, I provide a brief overview of the literature on response-shift bias and discuss common pitfalls in the use and reporting of retrospective pretest results, including a failure to consider multiple factors that may affect all test scores, as well as claims that retrospective pretests are less biased than traditional pretests, provide more accurate estimates of effects, and are necessarily superior to traditional pretests in program evaluation. I comment on the article by Little et al. (2019) in this issue in light of the literature on retrospective pretests and discuss the need for a theoretical framework to guide research on response-shift bias. The goal of the commentary is to provide readers with an informed and critical lens through which to evaluate and use retrospective pretest methods.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Robinson, Christian, Nick Cutfield, John Mottershead, Katrina Sharples, Rosalina Richards, Jason Kingan, Celina Ledgard, et al. "Media reporting of health interventions in New Zealand: a retrospective analysis." Internal Medicine Journal 48, no. 8 (August 2018): 924–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imj.13936.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Jeong, Ihn Sook, Jae Sim Jeong, Jun Seok Sohn, Jeong Hwa Choi, Sun Young Jeong, Su Ha Han, Seung Mae Choi, Jeong A. Youn, and Ju Yeon Song. "Prospective and Retrospective Incidence and Post-exposure Reporting of Needlestick Injuries." Korean Journal of Nosocomial Infection Control 20, no. 1 (2015): 29. http://dx.doi.org/10.14192/kjnic.2015.20.1.29.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Perera, Gayan, Robert Stewart, Irene J. Higginson, and Katherine E. Sleeman. "Reporting of clinically diagnosed dementia on death certificates: retrospective cohort study." Age and Ageing 45, no. 5 (May 4, 2016): 667–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afw077.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Maughan, Barbara, and Michael Rutter. "Retrospective Reporting of Childhood Adversity: Issues in Assessing Long-Term Recall." Journal of Personality Disorders 11, no. 1 (March 1997): 19–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/pedi.1997.11.1.19.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Alfaro, J. Ray, J. S. Dick, S. Swanson, P. Schantz, J. W. Swanson, and S. X. Cavanaugh. "A Retrospective Review of a Customized Radiation Oncology Incident Reporting Program." International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics 105, no. 1 (September 2019): E611. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.1133.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Shattuck, Rachel M., and Michael S. Rendall. "Retrospective Reporting of First Employment in the Life-courses of U.S. Women." Sociological Methodology 47, no. 1 (August 2017): 307–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0081175017723397.

Full text

Abstract:

The authors investigate the accuracy of young women’s retrospective reporting on their first substantial employment in three major, nationally representative U.S. surveys, examining hypotheses that longer recall duration, employment histories with lower salience and higher complexity, and an absence of “anchoring” biographical details will adversely affect reporting accuracy. The authors compare retrospective reports to benchmark panel survey estimates for the same cohorts. Sociodemographic groups—notably non-Hispanic white women and women with college-educated mothers—whose early employment histories at these ages are in aggregate more complex (multiple jobs) and lower in salience (more part-time jobs) are more likely to omit the occurrence of their first substantial job or employment and to misreport their first job or employment as occurring at an older age. Also, retrospective reports are skewed toward overreporting longer, therefore more salient, later jobs over shorter, earlier jobs. The relatively small magnitudes of differences, however, indicate that the retrospective questions nevertheless capture these summary indicators of first substantial employment reasonably accurately. Moreover, these differences are especially small for groups of women who are more likely to experience labor-market disadvantage and for women with early births.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Mullen, Dorinda, and David Gibbons. "A retrospective comparison of salivary gland fine needle aspiration reporting with the Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytology." Cytopathology 31, no. 3 (March 18, 2020): 208–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cyt.12811.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Walentynowicz, Marta, Ilse Van Diest, Filip Raes, and Omer Van den Bergh. "Ways of encoding somatic information and their effects on retrospective symptom reporting." British Journal of Health Psychology 22, no. 2 (February 13, 2017): 362–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12234.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Walentynowicz, Marta, Katleen Bogaerts, Ilse Van Diest, Filip Raes, and Omer Van den Bergh. "Was it so bad? The role of retrospective memory in symptom reporting." Health Psychology 34, no. 12 (2015): 1166–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/hea0000222.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Matthews, Geraldine A., Jo C. Dumville, Catherine E. Hewitt, and David J. Torgerson. "Retrospective cohort study highlighted outcome reporting bias in UK publicly funded trials." Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 64, no. 12 (December 2011): 1317–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.013.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Ashcroft, Darren M., and Jonathan Cooke. "Retrospective analysis of medication incidents reported using an on-line reporting system." Pharmacy World & Science 28, no. 6 (November 21, 2006): 359–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-006-9040-8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Gough, Brogan, Christine Hoggins, Rob Donkin, and Vizmary Montes. "P10-F READER: Reporting ECG abnormalities during EEG recording – A retrospective analysis." Clinical Neurophysiology 130, no. 7 (July 2019): e69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2019.04.463.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Smith-Greenaway, Emily, and Christie Sennott. "Death and Desirability: Retrospective Reporting of Unintended Pregnancy After a Child’s Death." Demography 53, no. 3 (May 5, 2016): 805–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13524-016-0475-9.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Graham, Cynthia A., and Barbara B. Sherwin. "The relationship between retrospective premenstrual symptom reporting and present oral contraceptive use." Journal of Psychosomatic Research 31, no. 1 (January 1987): 45–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(87)90097-3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Eck, Linda H., Robert C. Klesges, Cindy L. Hanson, and JoAnne White. "Reporting retrospective dietary intake by food frequency questionnaire in a pediatric population." Journal of the American Dietetic Association 91, no. 5 (May 1991): 606–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0002-8223(21)01183-4.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Layfield, Lester J. "The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytology: A Retrospective Review." Journal of Molecular Pathology 2, no. 2 (April 5, 2021): 101–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jmp2020010.

Full text

Abstract:

Since the introduction of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytology, much experience has been gained and published concerning the utility of the diagnostic categories, malignancy risk of the categories and reproducibility of the system. This new information has resulted in modifications to the system which will become part of the World Health Organization (WHO) System for Reporting Pancreatic Cytology. Herein we report our experience with the system and information from the published literature.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Hatakeyama, Shingo, Takahiro Yoneyama, Yasuhiro Hashimoto, Takuya Koie, and Chikara Ohyama. "Difference in toxicity reporting between patients and clinicians during systemic chemotherapy for urothelial carcinoma." Journal of Clinical Oncology 35, no. 6_suppl (February 20, 2017): 347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2017.35.6_suppl.347.

Full text

Abstract:

347 Background: Symptomatic toxicities associated with anticancer treatments are at high risk of under-reporting by clinicians. However, insufficient evidence is available for urothelial carcinoma. To compare toxicity reporting by patients and clinicians in urothelial carcinoma patients who received systemic chemotherapy. Methods: Between June 2013 and March 2016, 100 urothelial carcinoma patients who received two courses of chemotherapy of gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GCis) or gemcitabine plus carboplatin (GCb) were included in this study. Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: During chemotherapy, patients answered QLQ-C30 quality of life (QOL) questionnaires, which included questions on four toxicity-related symptoms (appetite loss, nausea, constipation, and diarrhea). Clinicians evaluated adverse events using CTCAE v4.0. Differences in toxicity reporting were retrospectively compared between patients and clinicians. Logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate potential factors for under-reporting by clinicians. Results: Toxicity under-reporting was most frequent in diarrhea (44%), followed by appetite loss (39%), constipation (33%), and nausea (22%). In total, toxicity under-reporting was observed in 72% patients. Background-adjusted logistic regression analyses showed that pretreatment QOL items, such as global and symptomatic scores, were selected as potential predictors for toxicity under-reporting by clinicians. Limitations of our study included its retrospective nature and small sample size. Conclusions: Toxicity under-reporting by clinicians is frequent in urothelial carcinoma patients who received systemic chemotherapy. Pretreatment QOL evaluation is essential to identify potential individuals at risk for toxicity under-reporting. Clinical trial information: UMIN000020784.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Schuler, Keke, Camilo J. Ruggero, Brittain Mahaffey, Adam Gonzalez, Jennifer L. Callahan, Adriel Boals, Monika A. Waszczuk, Benjamin J. Luft, and Roman Kotov. "When Hindsight Is Not 20/20: Ecological Momentary Assessment of PTSD Symptoms Versus Retrospective Report." Assessment 28, no. 1 (August 17, 2019): 238–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191119869826.

Full text

Abstract:

Assessment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has relied almost exclusively on retrospective memory of symptoms, sometimes over long intervals. This approach creates potential for recall bias and obscures the extent to which symptoms fluctuate. The aim of the present study was to examine the discrepancy between retrospective self-reporting of PTSD symptoms and ecological momentary assessment (EMA), which captures symptoms closer to when they occur. The study also sought to estimate the degree to which PTSD symptoms vary or are stable in the short-term. World Trade Center responders ( N = 202) oversampled for current PTSD (19.3% met criteria in past month) were assessed three times a day for 7 consecutive days. Retrospective assessment of past week symptoms at the end of the reporting period were compared with daily EMA reports. There was correspondence between two approaches, but retrospective reports most closely reflected symptom severity on the worst day of the reporting period rather than average severity across the week. Symptoms varied significantly, even within the span of hours. Findings support intervention research efforts focused on exploiting significant, short-term variability of PTSD symptoms, and suggest that traditional assessments most reflect the worst day of symptoms over a given period of recall.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Getova, Violeta I., Stanislav R. Georgiev, Assena H. Stoimenova, and Elina S. Petkova-Georgieva. "Bulgarian Experience with Adverse Drug Reaction Reports from Patients and Consumers – Retrospective Data-base Study." Folia Medica 60, no. 3 (September 1, 2018): 447–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/folmed-2018-0016.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Background: Since 2012, in compliance with the changes in the European legislation, the Bulgarian Drug Agency (BDA) has been receiving adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports directly from patients as well as from healthcare professionals and marketing authorization holders (MAH). Adverse reaction reports from patients and consumers have different characteristics from those sent by healthcare professionals. Moreover, they may require specific algorithm and assessment methods in order to be informative and beneficial to the pharmacovigilance system. Aim: The study aims to analyze the data-base of consumer reports in Bulgaria in order to distinguish and classify the main characteristics of the ADR reports from non-healthcare professionals. Materials and methods: In-depth analysis of the Bulgarian data-base of consumer ADR reports for 2012-2016 was conducted. The criteria include patient demographic characteristics, preferred method of reporting, seriousness and expectedness criteria and most frequently reported pharmacological groups. Results: The data showed the current trends in patient reporting in the country. It also marked new courses for development of the spontaneous reporting system and collection of safety data. The analysis of the data-base showed a rather stable level of patient reporting with a tendency for constant growth every year. Bulgaria follows the world tendencies for high number of reports for insufficiently studied ADRs which meet the seriousness criteria. The review of the most frequently reported ATC codes could lead to the conclusion that the current pharmacovigi-lance methods are not sensitive enough for specific groups of medicines. Conclusions: The results from the conducted study confirm the importance of patient reporting as a valuable source of information on adverse drug reactions. Moreover, it draws the attention to the lack of more sensitive methods for evaluation of drug safety in specific pharmacological groups. Maintenance of consumer-friendly ADR reporting system and innovative assessment algorithms should be the future directions for development in post-marketing surveillance.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Rubin, Daniel S., Colin Pesyna, Sharon Jakubczyk, Chuanhong Liao, and Avery Tung. "Introduction of a Mobile Adverse Event Reporting System Is Associated With Participation in Adverse Event Reporting." American Journal of Medical Quality 34, no. 1 (June 25, 2018): 30–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1062860618781920.

Full text

Abstract:

Physicians underutilize adverse event reporting systems. Web-based platforms have increased participation; thus, it was hypothesized that a mobile application would increase adverse event reporting. The authors developed a mobile reporting application for iOS and Android operating systems and performed a retrospective review on reporting rates by clinicians in the Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care. Monthly reporting rates were calculated for the intervention year and for the 2 prior years (2013-2016). The Wilcoxon rank sum test and χ2 test were used to evaluate significance. Overall monthly reporting rates for all clinicians were 15.3 ± 7 for the first time period, 17.3 ± 6 for the second time period, and 27.9 ± 7 for the third time period ( P = .0035). The majority of reports in the third time period were submitted using the mobile application (193/337, 57%, P = .026). Deployment of a mobile application reduced barriers to adverse event reporting and increased monthly reporting rates for all clinicians.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Campbell, Peter G., Jennifer Malone, Sanjay Yadla, Rohan Chitale, Rani Nasser, Mitchell G. Maltenfort, Alex Vaccaro, and John K. Ratliff. "Comparison of ICD-9–based, retrospective, and prospective assessments of perioperative complications: assessment of accuracy in reporting." Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine 14, no. 1 (January 2011): 16–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2010.9.spine10151.

Full text

Abstract:

Object Large studies of ICD-9–based complication and hospital-acquired condition (HAC) chart reviews have not been validated through a comparison with prospective assessments of perioperative adverse event occurrence. Retrospective chart review, while generally assumed to underreport complication occurrence, has not been subjected to prospective study. It is unclear whether ICD-9–based population studies are more accurate than retrospective reviews or are perhaps equally susceptible to bias. To determine the validity of an ICD-9–based assessment of perioperative complications, the authors compared a prospective independent evaluation of such complications with ICD-9–based HAC data in a cohort of patients who underwent spine surgery. For further comparison, a separate retrospective review of the same cohort of patients was completed as well. Methods A prospective assessment of complications in spine surgery over a 6-month period (May to December 2008) was completed using an independent auditor and a validated definition of perioperative complications. The auditor maintained a prospective database, which included complications occurring in the initial 30 days after surgery. All medical adverse events were included in the assessment. All patients undergoing spine surgery during the study period were eligible for inclusion; the only exclusionary criterion used was the availability of the auditor for patient assessment. From the overall patient database, 100 patients were randomly extracted for further review; in these patients ICD-9–based HAC data were obtained from coder data. Separately, a retrospective assessment of complication incidence was completed using chart and electronic medical record review. The same definition of perioperative adverse events and the inclusion of medical adverse events were applied in the prospective, ICD-9–based, and retrospective assessments. Results Ninety-two patients had adequate records for the ICD-9 assessment, whereas 98 patients had adequate chart information for retrospective review. The overall complication incidence among the groups was similar (major complications: ICD-9 17.4%, retrospective 19.4%, and prospective 22.4%; minor complications: ICD-9 43.8%, retrospective 31.6%, and prospective 42.9%). However, the ICD-9–based assessment included many minor medical events not deemed complications by the auditor. Rates of specific complications were consistently underreported in both the ICD-9 and the retrospective assessments. The ICD-9 assessment underreported infection, the need for reoperation, deep wound infection, deep venous thrombosis, and new neurological deficits (p = 0.003, p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, p = 0.0025, and p = 0.04, respectively). The retrospective review underestimated incidences of infection, the need for revision, and deep wound infection (p < 0.0001 for each). Only in the capture of new cardiac events was ICD-9–based reporting more accurate than prospective data accrual (p = 0.04). The most sensitive measure for the appreciation of complication occurrence was the prospective review, followed by the ICD-9–based assessment (p = 0.05). Conclusions An ICD-9–based coding of perioperative adverse events and major complications in a cohort of spine surgery patients revealed an overall complication incidence similar to that in a prospectively executed measure. In contrast, a retrospective review underestimated complication incidence. The ICD-9–based review captured many medical events of limited clinical import, inflating the overall incidence of adverse events demonstrated by this approach. In multiple categories of major, clinically significant perioperative complications, ICD-9–based and retrospective assessments significantly underestimated complication incidence. These findings illustrate a significant potential weakness and source of inaccuracy in the use of population-based ICD-9 and retrospective complication recording.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

George, Charles. "The Ecclesiastical Common Law: A Quarter-century Retrospective." Ecclesiastical Law Journal 14, no. 1 (December 5, 2011): 20–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0956618x11000743.

Full text

Abstract:

This article reviews developments in ecclesiastical case law (interpreted widely) over the 25 years since the Ecclesiastical Law Journal was founded, focusing on four areas, in each of which, in the author's view, there have been significant developments: freedom of religion; the constitution of the Church of England; the protection of listed buildings; liturgy, ritual and doctrine. It notes the role of the Journal in reporting consistory court decisions and thus ensuring greater consistency of decision-making. It concludes by mentioning some of the leading cases in various other areas of ecclesiastical law.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

SAUERLAND, S., R. LEFERING, and E. A. M. NEUGEBAUER. "Retrospective Clinical Studies in Surgery: Potentials and Pitfalls." Journal of Hand Surgery 27, no. 2 (April 2002): 117–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1054/jhsb.2001.0703.

Full text

Abstract:

As many surgical studies are performed retrospectively, it is desirable to improve the conduct, analysis and reporting of such research designs. This article reviews some of the most common forms of bias encountered in clinical research and outlines various types of study design and analysis that can help to minimize the amount of bias introduced into the results. We describe the advantages and disadvantages of ‘raw’ data analysis, stratified analysis, matched pair analysis and multivariate analysis, and apply them to an example of a hypothetical hand surgery study.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Aldik, MG, VM Raju, and C. Daneshvar. "M21 Pleural effusion size – a retrospective comparison of computed tomography and ultrasound reporting." Thorax 71, Suppl 3 (November 15, 2016): A268.3—A270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209333.463.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Oyama, Saki, Keiko Hosohata, Ayaka Inada, Iku Niinomi, Yasuhiro Mori, Yuki Yamaguchi, Mayako Uchida, and Kazunori Iwanaga. "Drug-induced tubulointerstitial nephritis in a retrospective study using spontaneous reporting system database." Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management Volume 14 (September 2018): 1599–604. http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/tcrm.s168696.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Nguyentat, Michael, Alexander Ushinsky, Alessandra Miranda-Aguirre, Edward Uchio, Chandana Lall, Layla Shirkhoda, Thomas Lee, Christopher Green, and Roozbeh Houshyar. "Validation of Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Version 2: A Retrospective Analysis." Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology 47, no. 6 (November 2018): 404–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2017.10.002.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Waterworth, C., G. Hughes, B. Srinivasan, and BG Marshall. "P207 Reporting of asbestos related lung disease to HM Coroner: A retrospective analysis." Thorax 68, Suppl 3 (November 14, 2013): A169.2—A170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-204457.359.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!