Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Reinforcement sensitivity theory / Journal articles

Journal articles on the topic 'Reinforcement sensitivity theory'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Reinforcement sensitivity theory.

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 22 February 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Reinforcement sensitivity theory.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Dolatyar, Khalil, and Benjamin R. Walker. "Reinforcement sensitivity theory and mindfulness." Personality and Individual Differences 163 (September 2020): 110089. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110089.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Corr, Philip J. "Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality." Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 28, no. 3 (May 2004): 317–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.01.005.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Johnson, Judith L., Lucy M. Kim, Thorayya S. Giovannelli, and Tiffany Cagle. "Reinforcement sensitivity theory, vengeance, and forgiveness." Personality and Individual Differences 48, no. 5 (April 2010): 612–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.12.018.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Smillie, Luke D., and Chris J. Jackson. "Functional Impulsivity and Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory." Journal of Personality 74, no. 1 (February 2006): 47–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00369.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Krupić, Dino, and Philip J. Corr. "How reinforcement sensitivity theory relates to self-determination theory." Personality and Individual Differences 155 (March 2020): 109705. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109705.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Jackson, Chris J. "Gray's Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory: a psychometric critique." Personality and Individual Differences 34, no. 3 (February 2003): 533–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(02)00305-7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Smederevac, Snežana, Dušanka Mitrović, Petar Čolović, and Željka Nikolašević. "Validation of the Measure of Revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory Constructs." Journal of Individual Differences 35, no. 1 (March 1, 2014): 12–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000121.

Full text

Abstract:

The paper presents validation of the Reinforcement Sensitivity Questionnaire (RSQ), measuring the constructs of the Revised Reinforcement Sensitivity theory (RST). The research was conducted on a sample of 565 participants, using three measures of the constructs of the Revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory – the Behavioral Inhibition System/Behavioral Approach System (BIS/BAS) scale, Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory Personality Questionnaire (RST-PQ), and Reinforcement Sensitivity Questionnaire. The results of confirmatory factor analysis suggest good internal validity of the RSQ, while the results of principal components analysis show that the RSQ scales are significantly related to other RST measures.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Warr, Peter B., Israel Sánchez-Cardona, Stanimira K. Taneva, Maria Vera, Uta K. Bindl, and Eva Cifre. "Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory, approach-affect and avoidance-affect." Cognition and Emotion 35, no. 4 (January 19, 2021): 619–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2020.1855119.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Bacon, Alison M., Philip J. Corr, and Liam Paul Satchell. "A reinforcement sensitivity theory explanation of antisocial behaviour." Personality and Individual Differences 123 (March 2018): 87–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.11.008.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Shahzadi, Kimiya, and Benjamin R. Walker. "Reinforcement sensitivity theory and relationship satisfaction via mastery." Personality and Individual Differences 139 (March 2019): 46–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.11.007.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Farrell, Nicola, Emma Sait, and Benjamin R. Walker. "Reinforcement sensitivity theory and goals in tattooed individuals." Personality and Individual Differences 167 (December 2020): 110234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110234.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Corr, Philip J. "The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality and psychopathology." International Journal of Psychophysiology 69, no. 3 (September 2008): 151–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.05.377.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Pickering, Alan D. "The Conceptual Nervous System and Personality." European Psychologist 2, no. 2 (January 1997): 139–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.2.2.139.

Full text

Abstract:

In this paper the conceptual nervous system approach to the study of personality is traced back to the ideas of Pavlov. The links between his ideas and two strands of modern European personality theory ( Eysenck's, 1967 , arousal theory of extraversion; Gray's, 1970 , reinforcement sensitivity theory) are emphasized. Recent data concerning reinforcement sensitivity theory have revealed a diversity of relationships between personality trait measures and the behavioral responses to the signals of reinforcement present. In view of these data, a reappraisal of the basics of reinforcement sensitivity theory are then presented, using neural network techniques to explore the conceptual nervous system features fundamental to reinforcement sensitivity theory. Simulations using these techniques are also presented which provide possible explanations for the variations in the experimental data, thereby suggesting that reinforcement sensitivity theory should be revised, rather than abandoned. One revision proposes that the fundamental brain systems involved may produce their behavioral effects solely via the influences of their outputs on arousal levels, with arousal linked to aspects of performance in a manner resembling Pavlovian transmarginal inhibition.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Leue, Anja, Burkhard Brocke, and Jürgen Hoyer. "Reinforcement sensitivity of sex offenders and non-offenders: An experimental and psychometric study of reinforcement sensitivity theory." British Journal of Psychology 99, no. 3 (August 2008): 361–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000712607x228519.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Leue, Anja, Sebastian Lange, and André Beauducel. "Reinforcement Sensitivity and Conflict Processing." Journal of Individual Differences 33, no. 3 (January 2012): 160–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000096.

Full text

Abstract:

The revised reinforcement sensitivity theory relates individual differences in conflict processing to aversive reinforcement. Conflict monitoring was modulated by means of three reinforcement-related conflict levels in a Go/Nogo task. The small conflict level entailed aversive verbal-nonmonetary feedback, the medium conflict level provided verbal and monetary loss feedback, and the high conflict level included verbal and monetary gain and loss feedback. In a sample of N = 91 students, treatment-induced changes of ERP data were reflected by an early N2 factor that occurred in a spatiotemporal principal component analysis including all conflict levels. The results indicate that the Nogo N2 was more negative following verbal-monetary reinforcement compared to verbal-nonmonetary reinforcement, whereas a ceiling effect probably occurred for the gain and loss condition. Low trait-BIS individuals showed more negative N2 scores on this factor in the medium and high compared to the small conflict level, whereas the N2 of high trait-BIS individuals did not change. This indicates that reinforcement as well as individual differences modulate conflict-monitoring intensity.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Leue, Anja, and André Beauducel. "A Meta-Analysis of Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory: On Performance Parameters in Reinforcement Tasks." Personality and Social Psychology Review 12, no. 4 (June 10, 2008): 353–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088868308316891.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Smillie, Luke D., Alan D. Pickering, and Chris J. Jackson. "The New Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory: Implications for Personality Measurement." Personality and Social Psychology Review 10, no. 4 (November 2006): 320–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_3.

Full text

Abstract:

In this article, we review recent modifications to Jeffrey Gray's (1973, 1991) reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST), and attempt to draw implications for psychometric measurement of personality traits. First, we consider Gray and McNaughton's (2000) functional revisions to the biobehavioral systems of RST. Second, we evaluate recent clarifications relating to interdependent effects that these systems may have on behavior, in addition to or in place of separable effects (e.g., Corr, 2001; Pickering, 1997). Finally, we consider ambiguities regarding the exact trait dimension to which Gray's “reward system” corresponds. From this review, we suggest that future work is needed to distinguish psychometric measures of (a) fear from anxiety and (b) reward-reactivity from trait impulsivity. We also suggest, on the basis of interdependent system views of RST and associated exploration using formal models, that traits that are based upon RST are likely to have substantial intercorrelations. Finally, we advise that more substantive work is required to define relevant constructs and behaviors in RST before we can be confident in our psychometric measures of them.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Kramer, Sam, Benjamin F. Rodriguez, and Sarah J. Kertz. "Predicting socially anxious group membership using reinforcement sensitivity theory." Personality and Individual Differences 86 (November 2015): 474–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.053.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Bacon, Alison M., and Philip J. Corr. "Motivating emotional intelligence: A reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) perspective." Motivation and Emotion 41, no. 2 (February 15, 2017): 254–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11031-017-9602-1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Lopez-Vergara, Hector I., Craig R. Colder, Larry W. Hawk, William F. Wieczorek, Rina D. Eiden, Liliana J. Lengua, and Jennifer P. Read. "Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory and Alcohol Outcome Expectancies in Early Adolescence." American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 38, no. 2 (January 5, 2012): 130–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/00952990.2011.643973.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Sugano, Tomoko, and Masahiro Sakamoto. "Relation of Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory and probability discounting of money." Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association 81 (September 20, 2017): 2C—067–2C—067. http://dx.doi.org/10.4992/pacjpa.81.0_2c-067.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Sugano, Tomoko, and Masahiro Sakamoto. "Relation between Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory and temporal discounting of money." Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association 82 (September 25, 2018): 2AM—005–2AM—005. http://dx.doi.org/10.4992/pacjpa.82.0_2am-005.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Čolović, Petar, Snežana Smederevac, Milan Oljača, Željka Nikolašević, and Dušanka Mitrović. "A Short Measure of the Revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory – RSQ17." Journal of Psychology 152, no. 3 (January 29, 2018): 133–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2017.1419158.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Bennett, Catherine, and Alison M. Bacon. "At Long Last – A Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory Explanation of Procrastination." Journal of Individual Differences 40, no. 4 (October 2019): 234–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000296.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract. Procrastination can result in poor wellbeing and performance in academia and the workplace. The present study combined personality and motivational explanations by examining procrastination through the lens of Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST), which assumes that personality traits are underpinned by basic systems of approach and avoidance motivation. Students ( N = 336; Mage = 21.34) and non-students ( N = 187; Mage = 37.98) completed the Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality Questionnaire (RST-PQ), measures of unintentional and general procrastination and, for students only, a measure of academic procrastination. In both samples, high impulsivity and high Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS) activation was associated with reports of general procrastination. In students, high Reward Reactivity (RR) was additionally associated with Unintentional Procrastination (UP), while low Goal-drive Persistence was associated with all forms of procrastination. These data suggest a role for both approach and avoidance motivations in procrastination. Results are discussed in terms of RST and implications for intervention.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Hutchison, Ann, Giles Burch, and Peter Boxall. "Reinforcement sensitivity theory as a predictor of senior-executive performance." Personality and Individual Differences 55, no. 8 (November 2013): 931–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.07.470.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Corr, Philip J. "Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality Questionnaires: Structural survey with recommendations." Personality and Individual Differences 89 (January 2016): 60–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.045.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Walker, Benjamin R., and Chris J. Jackson. "Examining the validity of the revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory scales." Personality and Individual Differences 106 (February 2017): 90–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.035.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

De Pascalis, V., K. Sommer, and P. Scacchia. "Resting Frontal Asymmetry and Revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory Motivational Traits." International Journal of Psychophysiology 131 (October 2018): S58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.07.173.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Gomez, Rapson, Andrew Cooper, Rhonda McOrmond, and Sara Tatlow. "Gray's reinforcement sensitivity theory: comparing the separable and joint subsystems." Personality and Individual Differences 37, no. 2 (July 2004): 289–305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.09.003.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Mussap, Alexander J. "Reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) and body change behaviour in males." Personality and Individual Differences 40, no. 4 (March 2006): 841–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.08.013.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Segarra, Pilar, Scott R. Ross, M. Carmen Pastor, Susana Montañés, Rosario Poy, and Javier Moltó. "MMPI-2 predictors of Gray’s two-factor reinforcement sensitivity theory." Personality and Individual Differences 43, no. 3 (August 2007): 437–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.12.013.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Hall, Phillip J., Chew Wuei Chong, Neil McNaughton, and Philip J. Corr. "An economic perspective on the Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of personality." Personality and Individual Differences 51, no. 3 (August 2011): 242–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.06.023.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Tull, Matthew T., Kim L. Gratz, Robert D. Latzman, Nathan A. Kimbrel, and C. W. Lejuez. "Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory and emotion regulation difficulties: A multimodal investigation." Personality and Individual Differences 49, no. 8 (December 2010): 989–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.010.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Harnett, Paul H., Natalie J. Loxton, and Chris J. Jackson. "Revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory: Implications for psychopathology and psychological health." Personality and Individual Differences 54, no. 3 (February 2013): 432–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.019.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Smillie, Luke D. "The conceptualisation, measurement and scope of reinforcement sensitivity in the context of a neuroscience of personality." European Journal of Personality 22, no. 5 (August 2008): 411–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.687.

Full text

Abstract:

Reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) is complex, and there are subtle differences between RST and other approach‐avoidance process theories of personality. However, most such theories posit a common biobehavioural mechanism underlying personality which we must therefore strive to understand: differential sensitivity to reinforcing stimuli. Reinforcement sensitivity is widely assessed using questionnaires, but should we treat such measures as (a) a proxy for reinforcement sensitivity itself (i.e. the underlying causes of personality) or (b) trait constructs potentially manifesting out of reinforcement sensitivity (i.e. the ‘surface’ of personality)? Might neuroscience paradigms, such as those I have reviewed in my target paper, provide an advantage over questionnaires in allowing us to move closer to (a), thereby improving both the measurement and our understanding of reinforcement sensitivity? Assuming we can achieve this, how useful is reinforcement sensitivity—and biological perspectives more generally—for explaining personality? These are the major questions raised in the discussion of my target paper, and among the most pertinent issues in this field today. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Donahue, John J., and Leonardo J. Caraballo. "Examining the triarchic model of psychopathy using revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory." Personality and Individual Differences 80 (July 2015): 125–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.031.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Jonason, Peter K., and Christopher J. Jackson. "The Dark Triad traits through the lens of Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory." Personality and Individual Differences 90 (February 2016): 273–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.023.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Cooper, Andrew J., Sarah Stirling, Sharon Dawe, Giulia Pugnaghi, and Philip J. Corr. "The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality in children: A new questionnaire." Personality and Individual Differences 115 (September 2017): 65–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.028.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Farrell, Nicola, and Benjamin R. Walker. "Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory and Problem Gambling in a General Population Sample." Journal of Gambling Studies 35, no. 4 (May 4, 2019): 1163–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10899-019-09850-3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

De Pascalis, Vilfredo, Paolo Scacchia, Kathrin Sommer, and Costanza Checcucci. "Psychopathy traits and reinforcement sensitivity theory: Prepulse inhibition and ERP responses." Biological Psychology 148 (November 2019): 107771. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.107771.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Hundt, Natalie E., Leslie H. Brown, Nathan A. Kimbrel, Molly A. Walsh, Rosemery Nelson-Gray, and Thomas R. Kwapil. "Reinforcement sensitivity theory predicts positive and negative affect in daily life." Personality and Individual Differences 54, no. 3 (February 2013): 350–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.09.021.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Hardie, Scott M., and Lynn Wright. "The relationship between Revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (rRST), handedness and indecision." Personality and Individual Differences 55, no. 3 (July 2013): 312–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.03.004.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Piotti, Patrizia, Liam Paul Satchell, and Tom Steven Lockhart. "Impulsivity and behaviour problems in dogs: A Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory perspective." Behavioural Processes 151 (June 2018): 104–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.03.012.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Bacon, Alison M., Chloe McDaid, Natasha Williams, and Philip J. Corr. "What motivates academic dishonesty in students? A reinforcement sensitivity theory explanation." British Journal of Educational Psychology 90, no. 1 (February 11, 2019): 152–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12269.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Mitchell, John T., Nathan A. Kimbrel, Natalie E. Hundt, Amanda R. Cobb, Rosemery O. Nelson‐Gray, and Christopher M. Lootens. "An analysis of reinforcement sensitivity theory and the five‐factor model." European Journal of Personality 21, no. 7 (November 2007): 869–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.644.

Full text

Abstract:

Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) and the Five‐Factor Model (FFM) are two prominent personality accounts that have emerged from different backgrounds. Although the two accounts are applied to similar research topics, there is limited empirical work examining the correspondence between them. The current study explored the relationship between RST‐based personality traits and the FFM domains and facets in an undergraduate sample (n = 668). Regression analyses indicated that Sensitivity to Punishment (SP) was positively associated with Neuroticism and Agreeableness, and negatively associated with Extraversion, Openness, and Conscientiousness. In contrast, Sensitivity to Reward (SR) was positively associated with Extraversion and Neuroticism, and negatively associated with Agreeableness and Conscientiousness. Exploratory analyses at the facet level specified the relationship between SP, SR, and each domain. A factor analysis was also conducted to explore the higher‐order factor structure of RST and the FFM domains. Three factors emerged, which we labelled SP, Stability‐Impulsivity, and Sensation Seeking. Taken together, these findings suggest that there is substantial overlap between these two accounts of personality. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

van der Linden, Dimitri, Debby G. J. Beckers, and Toon W. Taris. "Reinforcement sensitivity theory at work: punishment sensitivity as a dispositional source of job‐related stress." European Journal of Personality 21, no. 7 (November 2007): 889–909. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.660.

Full text

Abstract:

Gray's reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) describes two important personality constructs; sensitivity to reward and sensitivity to punishment. In two studies, we examine whether these constructs can be considered dispositions to work stress. Results of Study 1 (N = 105 employees in different occupations) indicated that employees with strong punishment sensitivity reacted more strongly to work stressors than others. This idea was confirmed in a longitudinal design in Study 2. Reward sensitivity was unrelated to stress in both studies. Overall, results strongly support the idea that punishment sensitivity is a dispositional source of work stress. Results further confirm that RST and its derived personality measures can contribute to theorizing about personality–environment interactions in a highly relevant daily setting, namely the working environment. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Hasking, Penelope, Mark Boyes, and Barbara Mullan. "Reward and Cognition: Integrating Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory and Social Cognitive Theory to Predict Drinking Behavior." Substance Use & Misuse 50, no. 10 (February 23, 2015): 1316–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2015.1005315.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Palmieri, Michael, Neil Shortland, and Presley McGarry. "Personality and online deviance: The role of reinforcement sensitivity theory in cybercrime." Computers in Human Behavior 120 (July 2021): 106745. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106745.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Smederevac, Snezana, and Dusanka Mitrovic. "Problems of the defining the dimensions of the Gray's reinforcement sensitivity theory." Psihologija 38, no. 3 (2005): 311–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/psi0503311s.

Full text

Abstract:

Jeffrey Gray has modified Eysenck's system by rotating the dimensions of extraversion and neuroticism by 45 degrees, which resulted in two new dimensions: impulsivity (behavioral approach system) and anxiety (behavioral inhibition system). The main purpose of this study was to examine psychometric properties of the BIS/BAS scale, inventory for assessment of dimensions included in Gray's theory, in order to, also, test the foundation of the Gray's constructs themselves. 476 participants were included, age 17 to 77. All subjects completed The BIS/BAS scale (Carver & White, 1994) and The Big Five Inventory (BFI; John, Donahue & Kentle, 1991, according to: John & Srivastava, 1999). Analysis of the BIS/BAS scale failed to replicate the original four-factor solution. Three factors were extracted, named Behavioral inhibition system (BIS), BAS-Striving for excitement and BAS-Drive. Psychometric characteristics of the BIS/BAS scale are not satisfactory. Result of the joint factor analysis of dimensions of the BIS/BAS scale and dimensions of the BFI questionnaire are three factors named active striving for reward, sensation seeking and anxiety. In general results can be considered supportive rather to Eysenck than to Gray, but they could also be ascribed to the failure in questionnaire operationalisation of the constructs of Reinforcement sensitivity theory.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Walker, Benjamin Robert, and Chris J. Jackson. "Managerial Implications for the Impact of Revised Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory on Creativity." Academy of Management Proceedings 2013, no. 1 (January 2013): 17562. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2013.17562abstract.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!