Contents
Academic literature on the topic 'Reciprocal Teaching Procedure'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Reciprocal Teaching Procedure.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Reciprocal Teaching Procedure"
1
Andrews, Jean F. "Deaf Children's Acquisition of Prereading Skills Using the Reciprocal Teaching Procedure." Exceptional Children 54, no. 4 (January 1988): 349–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001440298805400409.
Full textAbstract:
Information is presented on the implementation of a prereading program in a school setting using the reciprocal training procedure and on implications for educators, teacher educators, and parents. This instructional procedure, grounded in Vygotsky's theory of language and learning, is an interactive dialogue through which the teacher explicitly models four prereading skills: finger spelling, book reading, story retelling, and word recognition during story-time session with experimental storybooks. Pre-post test analyses show that gains were made in letter, word, and story knowledge through the use of the reciprocal teaching procedure.
2
Rosenshine, Barak, and Carla Meister. "Reciprocal Teaching: A Review of the Research." Review of Educational Research 64, no. 4 (December 1994): 479–530. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543064004479.
Full textAbstract:
Reciprocal teaching is an instructional procedure designed to teach students cognitive strategies that might lead to improved reading comprehension. The learning of cognitive strategies such as summarization, question generation, clarification, and prediction is supported through dialogue between teacher and students as they attempt to gain meaning from text. This article is a review of sixteen studies on reciprocal teaching, which include published studies found in journal articles and unpublished studies indexed in Dissertation Abstracts International. All the studies included in this review were quantitative in methodology. When standardized tests were used to assess comprehension, the median effect size, favoring reciprocal teaching, was .32. When experimenter-developed comprehension tests were used, the median effect size was .88. We also discuss the role of cognitive strategies in enhancing comprehension, the strategies that were most helpful, instructional approaches for teaching cognitive strategies, the quality of the dialogue during reciprocal teaching, and suggestions for future research and practice.
3
Reutzel, D. Ray, and Paul M. Hollingsworth. "Highlighting Key Vocabulary: A Generative-Reciprocal Procedure for Teaching Selected Inference Types." Reading Research Quarterly 23, no. 3 (1988): 358. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/748047.
Full text
4
Syarfuni. "THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RECIPROCAL TEACHING IN TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION (AN EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH AT SMPN 4 BANDA ACEH)." Visipena Journal 2, no. 2 (December 31, 2011): 17–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.46244/visipena.v2i2.43.
Full textAbstract:
This study is about the implementation of reciprocal teaching in teaching reading comprehension. The objectives of the study are:1) to find out if students who are taught through reciprocal teaching have a difference significant than those who are taught through grammar translation method, 2) to find out what the students’ responses toward the implementation of reciprocal teaching in teaching reading comprehension. The method in this study is quantitative and qualitative method. The population is all the second grade students in SMPN 4 Banda Aceh, and the sample is the VIII/I and the VIII/II. The sample was chosen by using random sampling. To obtain the data related to the implementation of reciprocal teaching the writer gave the pre-test and post-test to two groups; experimental group and control group. The instrument used to collect the data was test and questionnaires. The test is used to see the result of achievement of students in reading comprehension while the questionnaires are used to get the students’ responses toward the implementation of reciprocal teaching. The quantitative data was analyzed by means of the statistical procedure in order to see whether there is a difference significant between reciprocal teaching method and grammar translation method in teaching reading comprehension. The questionnaires were analyzed by using the percentage formula for each question item. After processing the data, it found that there is a significant difference between reciprocal teaching and grammar translation method and the students’ response are positive. It can be concluded that reciprocal teaching is better than grammar translation method in teaching reading comprehension. This is proved by the test result where t-test score is higher than t-table (2.45 >1.70) and the students’ ability in the experimental group increases up to 21% while in the control group the students’ ability reaches only 9%. This means that the alternative hypothesis is accepted and the null hypothesis is rejected.
5
Cahyani, Putri Amalia. "Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Peserta Didik Melalui Model Pembelajaran Reciprocal Teaching Dengan Berbantuan Alat Peraga “Kartu Pintar” Pada Materi Prisma Dan Limas Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Pandaan Tahun Ajaran 2017/2018." JPM : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 5, no. 1 (March 6, 2019): 28. http://dx.doi.org/10.33474/jpm.v5i1.2627.
Full textAbstract:
The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is an increase in mathematical reasoning abilities and to describe the mathematical reasoning abilities of students through the Reciprocal Teaching learning model assisted with "smart card" teaching aids on prism and pyramid material class VIII Public Middle School 1 Pandaan 2017/2018 Academic Year. The research method used in this study, which is a mixed method with an experimental mixed method design design, was to wrap a basic mixed method design into a further strategy, namely by adding processes into the experimental procedure. The results showed that based on the results of quantitative data analysis, it was concluded that there was an increase between mathematical reasoning abilities before and after using the Reciprocal Teaching learning model with the help of "smart card" teaching aids on class VIII prism and pyramid material in Pandaan 1 Public Middle School. From some of the data analysis shows that mathematical reasoning ability increases after the application of the Reciprocal Teaching learning model with the help of "smart card" teaching aids.
6
Hariyanto, Sugeng. "Reciprocal Teaching and Genre-Based Approach Combination: A Proposed Strategy in Business English Classes." TEFLIN Journal - A publication on the teaching and learning of English 12, no. 2 (September 3, 2015): 252. http://dx.doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v12i2/252-266.
Full textAbstract:
Reciprocal teaching (RT) is a teaching procedure for reading comprehension involving direct instruction, modeling, feedback and repeated practice in four cognitive strategies, namely questioning, clarifying, summarizing, and predicting. The focus of Genre-based approach is to show students how meaning can be constructed with language and train them to make use of language to fulfill their needs. This approach proceeds through 4 steps: preparation, modelng, joint construction, independent construction, plus one additional step, publishing. Reciprocal teaching approach (RT) is used because it can incorporate speaking activities. The texts are selected based on the genre that will be used in the work sites, namely in the office setting. This article presents how to apply reciprocal teaching and genre-based approach to teach Business English at non-English Department of university level. This proposed strategy has been tried out at Business Administration Department of State Polytechnic of Malang. A sample lesson plan is given at the end of this article.
7
Islam, Syaiful. "IMPLEMENTING RECIPROCAL TEACHING METHOD IN IMPROVE THE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ABILITY." ETERNAL (English, Teaching, Learning, and Research Journal) 6, no. 1 (June 30, 2020): 96. http://dx.doi.org/10.24252/eternal.v61.2020.a9.
Full textAbstract:
This research was designed to improve the students’ reading comprehension in English through the implementation of Reciprocal Teaching Method. The research employed a collaborative classroom action research design in which the researcher and the collaborative teacher worked together in preparing a suitable procedure of Reciprocal Teaching Method, designing the lesson plan, determining of the criteria of success, implementing the action, observing, and doing reflections. The subjects of this research were 40 students of Grade XI BHS 2 at MA. Nurul Jadid Problolinggo in the academic year 2019/2020. The data of this research were obtained through (1) observation sheet, to obtain information about teacher’s and the students’ activities and performance during the implementation of Reciprocal Teaching Method, (2) quiz, to identify whether the students had made progress in reading comprehension, and (3) questionnaire, to get information from the students whether the strategy applied could motivate the students to actively involve during the teaching and learning process. The result of the research showed that the Reciprocal Teaching Method in the teaching-learning of reading comprehension was effective in improving the students’ reading comprehension. The improvement was indicated by the increase of the students’ average score throughout the cycle of action that was 72.63 in the preliminary study; 79.88 in the test of Cycle 1. Besides, students were motivated and active in the class using the method in terms of learning to work together and to help each other in a group with different competence, which was showed by the result of their works.
8
Ashegh Navaie, Leila. "The Effects of Reciprocal Teaching on Reading Comprehension of Iranian EFL Learners." Advances in Language and Literary Studies 9, no. 4 (August 31, 2018): 26. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.4p.26.
Full textAbstract:
The present study aimed at investigating the effectiveness of the Reciprocal Teaching Procedure (RTP) on reading comprehension of intermediate Iranian EFL learners in Iran. Two intact groups were chosen non-randomly, one as the control group and the other as the experimental group. Then an IELTS reading test was administered to both groups as pretest. After analyzing the collected scores by independent t-test it was known that there was no meaningful difference between control and experimental groups before the treatment. Both groups were offered 15 sessions of reading, the experimental group received treatment, they were taught reading by applying RTP as an instructional strategy, but the control group was taught reading through the conventional method. The results showed that reciprocal teaching can improve reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. Pedagogical implications are discussed.
9
Dharmawan, I. Komang Surya, and I. Dewa Gede Rat Dwiyana Putra. "Improving Students’ Participation And Motivation In Reading Comprehension Through Reciprocal Teaching." Jurnal Penjaminan Mutu 6, no. 1 (March 10, 2020): 23. http://dx.doi.org/10.25078/jpm.v6i1.935.
Full textAbstract:
<p><em>Penelitian ini merupakan sebuah upaya untuk meningkatkan partisipasi dan motivasi siswa dalam kegiatan membaca teks procedure dan report melalui metode </em>Reciprocal Teaching<em>. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif yang dikembangkan menjadi sebuah PTK (Penelitian Tindakan Kelas). Subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas 9 SMP Negeri 9 Satu Atap Praya Barat Daya. Kelas ini terdiri dari 4 (empat) siswa. Subjek dipilih berdasarkan observasi awal dan tes yang dilakukan oleh penulis pada awal penelitian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa siswa tersebut memiliki partisipasi dan motivasi yang rendah dalam kegiatan membaca, sehingga mempengaruhi pemahaman membaca mereka dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris. Tahap PTK dilakukan dalam dua siklus yang meliputi perencanaan, pelaksanaan, observasi, refleksi dan revisi. Hasilna menunjukkan bahwa metode </em>Reciprocal Teaching <em>dapat meningkatkan partisipasi siswa terhadap kegiatan membaca pada siklus I (terjadi peningkatan 12%) dan siklus II (terjadi peningkatan 12%). Selain itu, motivasi siswa terhadap kegiatan membaca mereka juga meningkat pada siklus I (terjadi peningkatan 7%) dan bahkan peningkatan yang lebih tinggi pada siklus II (terjadi peningkatan 17%). Ini berarti bahwa metode ini terbukti dapat meningkatkan partisipasi siswa dalam kegiatan membaca mereka. Disamping itu, motivasi siswa meningkat dengan penerapan metode </em>Reciprocal Teaching<em> ini. Penelitian ini dapat digunakan sebagai referensi untuk melakukan penelitian yang berkaitan dengan kemampuan membaca atau metode pembelajaran </em>Reciprocal Teaching<em> kepada peneliti lain ataupun praktisi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris.</em></p>
10
Yeh, Hui-Chin, Hsiu-Ting Hung, and Yu-Hsin Chiang. "The use of online annotations in reading instruction and its impact on students’ reading progress and processes." ReCALL 29, no. 1 (April 8, 2016): 22–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0958344016000021.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractStudies suggest that the incorporation of online annotations in reading instruction can improve students’ reading comprehension. However, little research has addressed how students use online annotations in their reading processes and how such use may lead to their improvement. This study thus adopted Reciprocal Teaching (RT) as an instructional framework to support students’ reading comprehension progress and processes, facilitated by the use of online annotations. A total of 54 English language learners at a university were recruited to read with online annotations based on the RT procedure, namely predicting, clarifying, questioning, and summarizing. The data collected included the students’ scores on pre- and post-tests and their participation records in a collaborative learning environment. The results reveal that the students enhanced their reading comprehension after the intervention. Their reading processes were also analyzed, and the major differences between the groups making more and less progress were identified. Those who made more progress not only frequently reviewed their previously generated predictions, clarifications, questions, and summaries but also actively provided feedback to their peers in a reciprocal manner. Pedagogical implications and recommendations are discussed.
Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Reciprocal Teaching Procedure"
1
Wisaijorn, Patareeya, and n/a. "Teaching reading comprehension to Thai EFL students: Reciprocal Teaching Procedure." University of Canberra. Professional Communication, 2003. http://erl.canberra.edu.au./public/adt-AUC20050802.140230.
Full textAbstract:
The main purpose of this study was to examine the effects of strategy training
in small group work on the reading comprehension of academic
texts in English by Thai English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students.
The strategy-training used was the Reciprocal Teaching Procedure (RTF)
which focused on the four reading comprehension strategies: predicting,
clarifying, questioning and summarizing.
The research study was an experimental one using a single group design.
The participants were thirty-four first year students enrolled in the English
for Academic Purposes (EAP) program at a tertiary institution in the
northeastern part of Thailand. Both quantitative and qualitative research
methods were used. The pre-, post- and follow-up reading tests were
employed for quantitative analysis. The students' performances were
analyzed for statistically significant differences immediately at the end of
the ten-week training and in the follow-up test eight weeks after the
training. Qualitative data were collected from students' pre-, post- and
follow-up questionnaires, checklists and journals, teacher's checklists and
journal, and independent observer's checklists and field notes.