Academic literature on the topic 'Rank dependent social evaluation function'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Rank dependent social evaluation function.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Rank dependent social evaluation function"
Puerta, Carmen, and Ana Urrutia. "A Dual Decomposition of Some Rank Dependent Social Evaluation Functions." International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 24, Suppl. 1 (December 2016): 107–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0218488516400067.
Full textMattan, Bradley D., Jennifer T. Kubota, and Jasmin Cloutier. "How Social Status Shapes Person Perception and Evaluation: A Social Neuroscience Perspective." Perspectives on Psychological Science 12, no. 3 (May 2017): 468–507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691616677828.
Full textCordoba, Juan Carlos, and Xiying Liu. "STOCHASTIC DOMINANCE AND DEMOGRAPHIC POLICY EVALUATION: A CRITIQUE." Journal of Demographic Economics 82, no. 1 (February 29, 2016): 111–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dem.2016.1.
Full textBen-Moshe, Dan. "IDENTIFICATION OF JOINT DISTRIBUTIONS IN DEPENDENT FACTOR MODELS." Econometric Theory 34, no. 1 (February 21, 2017): 134–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s026646661700007x.
Full textDamaševičius, Robertas, and Rytis Maskeliūnas. "Agent State Flipping Based Hybridization of Heuristic Optimization Algorithms: A Case of Bat Algorithm and Krill Herd Hybrid Algorithm." Algorithms 14, no. 12 (December 10, 2021): 358. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/a14120358.
Full textSancoko, Sancoko, Zahra Shalsabilla Prayogi, Badra Al Aufa, and Rahmat Yuliawan. "Evaluation of Employee Acceptance of the IMS Application at PT Sarana Utama Adimandiri: TAM Approach." ILKOM Jurnal Ilmiah 14, no. 1 (April 30, 2022): 74–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.33096/ilkom.v14i1.1120.74-79.
Full textYusuf, Ah, Retno Indarwati, and Arifudin Dwi Jayanto. "Brain Gym Improves Cognitive Function for Elderly." Jurnal Ners 5, no. 1 (April 2, 2017): 79–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/jn.v5i1.3927.
Full textNixon, A., J. Allen, E. Miller, S. Savage, N. Kaplan, M. Starr, J. Bendell, H. Uronis, N. Fernando, and H. Hurwitz. "Clinical evaluation of nitric oxide responses to anti-VEGF therapy with bevacizumab." Journal of Clinical Oncology 25, no. 18_suppl (June 20, 2007): 14039. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.14039.
Full textPence, Brandt D., Tushar K. Bhattacharya, Pul Park, Jennifer L. Rytych, Jacob M. Allen, Yi Sun, Robert H. McCusker, et al. "Dose-dependent decrease in mortality with no cognitive or muscle function improvements due to dietary EGCG supplementation in aged mice." Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism 42, no. 5 (May 2017): 495–502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2016-0530.
Full textCaradonna, Salvatore G., Tie-Yuan Zhang, Nicholas O’Toole, Mo-Jun Shen, Huzefa Khalil, Nathan R. Einhorn, Xianglan Wen, et al. "Genomic modules and intramodular network concordance in susceptible and resilient male mice across models of stress." Neuropsychopharmacology 47, no. 5 (November 30, 2021): 987–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41386-021-01219-8.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Rank dependent social evaluation function"
Prete, Vincenzo. "Inequality, Polarization and Redistributive Policies." Doctoral thesis, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/11562/959719.
Full textThis dissertation focuses on optimal income taxation theory and analyses the effect of different redistributive objectives on the shape of the optimal tax system. In particular, we investigate how the optimal tax system should be designed in order to achieve inequality and polarization reduction objectives. To this end, in line with the works by Kanbur et al. (2006) and Saez and Stantcheva (2016) we adopt a “non-welfarist” (n.w.) approach and focus on piecewise linear tax systems. By choosing the n.w. approach we recognize that redistributive objectives are crucial per se to the determination of the optimal tax schedule, and not necessarily because of the shape of the agents’ utility function. The main difference between welfarism and n.w. is that in the latter the argument of the social welfare function is different from individuals’ utility. Therefore, we focus on income as the most appropriate variable to investigate when the government’s objective is the reduction of inequality, poverty or polarization. We formalize the n.w. objective by assuming that the government maximizes a rank-dependent social evaluation function defined over individuals’ net income, subject to a budget constraint. Then, the evaluation of the income distribution can be summarized by the mean income of the distribution and a linear index of dispersion dependent on the choice of the weighting function. Specifically, we consider two weighting functions which allow to formalize redistributive objectives expressed in terms of changes in the Gini index of income in case of inequality considerations. Then, by suitable modifications of the positional weights it is possible, within the same model, to move towards evaluations concerned with the income polarization. We consider piecewise linear tax systems that represent the most adopted scheme and the easiest way to identify changes in the tax schedule when the government objectives move from inequality to polarization reduction. The results we obtain highlight the relationship between the redistributive objective and the theoretical optimal shape of the tax system. In particular, when redistribution is not allowed and the focus is only on the socially desirable mechanism collecting a given level of per-capita revenue, the optimal tax schemes substantially differ depending on whether the government is inequality or polarization sensitive. With fixed labour supply the optimal tax system reducing inequality requires a no tax area until a given threshold and the maximal admissible taxation above that threshold, which is set in order to satisfy the revenue requirement. As to polarization reduction, the optimal tax system requires to tax with the maximal admissible tax rate all incomes within the central bracket, including also the median income. Tax rates in the two external brackets are set equal to zero. When we introduce constant labour supply elasticity the results are qualitatively confirmed. The optimal tax systems reducing inequality and polarization are respectively convex and non-convex. By introducing the possibility to use lump-sum transfers (tax and subsidy) the design of the optimal tax system is independent of the revenue requirement and the sign of the lump-sum transfer depends on the difference between the collected amount and the required revenue. The optimal tax system reducing inequality (polarization) is convex (non-convex), with marginal tax rates decreasing in the level of the constant labour supply elasticity. The lump-sum transfer is positive or negative depending on the combination of the level of gross income dispersion and the value of labour supply elasticity. Then, the lump-sum taxation is more likely to be used to reduce polarization. Finally, when redistribution is not allowed and assuming non-constant labour supply elasticity the results are qualitatively in line with the case of constant elasticity. However, marginal tax rates are lower for income percentiles exhibiting higher elasticity.
Book chapters on the topic "Rank dependent social evaluation function"
Bazán, Paulo Rodrigo, and Edson Amaro. "fMRI and fNIRS Methods for Social Brain Studies: Hyperscanning Possibilities." In Social and Affective Neuroscience of Everyday Human Interaction, 231–54. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08651-9_14.
Full textO’Donnell, Owen, and Tom Van Ourti. "Rank-dependent equity weights." In Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis, edited by Owen O’Donnell and Tom Van Ourti, 237–52. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198838197.003.0012.
Full textNorheim, Ole F., Miqdad Asaria, Kjell Arne Johansson, Trygve Ottersen, and Aki Tsuchiya. "Level-dependent equity weights." In Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis, edited by Owen O’Donnell and Tom Van Ourti, 253–74. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198838197.003.0013.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Rank dependent social evaluation function"
Cendrasilvinia, Herose, The Maria Meiwati Widagdo, and Widya Christine Manus. "Burden and Quality of Life of Dependent Elderly Caregivers in Pakuncen Village Yogyakarta." In The 7th International Conference on Public Health 2020. Masters Program in Public Health, Universitas Sebelas Maret, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.26911/the7thicph.01.08.
Full textAfgan, Naim H., Marina Jovanovic, and Maria G. Carvalho. "Sustainability Assessment of Solar Energy Systems." In ASME 2004 International Solar Energy Conference. ASMEDC, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/isec2004-65140.
Full textFreni, Fabrizio, Vincenzo Napolitano, Silvia Mancini, and Roberto Buscaglia. "ASCAPE: A Flexible and Efficient Analytical Tool to Evaluate Aquifer Storage Capacity for CO2 Sequestration." In Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference. SPE, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/208222-ms.
Full textCohn, Marvin J. "Enhanced Creep Life Evaluations for Grade 91 Circumferential Weldments." In ASME 2017 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/pvp2017-65815.
Full text