Academic literature on the topic 'Queensland land policy'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Queensland land policy.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Queensland land policy"
1
Reside, April E., Jutta Beher, Anita J. Cosgrove, Megan C. Evans, Leonie Seabrook, Jennifer L. Silcock, Amelia S. Wenger, and Martine Maron. "Ecological consequences of land clearing and policy reform in Queensland." Pacific Conservation Biology 23, no. 3 (2017): 219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/pc17001.
Full textAbstract:
Land clearing threatens biodiversity, impairs the functioning of terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems, and is a key contributor to human-induced climate change. The rates of land clearing in the State of Queensland, Australia, are at globally significant levels, and have been the subject of intense and polarised political debate. In 2016, a legislative bill that aimed to restore stronger controls over land clearing failed to pass in the Queensland Parliament, despite the clear scientific basis for policy reform. Here, we provide a short history of the recent policy debate over land clearing in Queensland, in the context of its global and national ecological significance. Land clearing affects regional climates, leading to hotter, drier climates that will impact on the Queensland economy and local communities. Loss of habitat from land clearing is a key threatening process for many endangered animals and plants. Runoff from land clearing results in sediment and nutrient enrichment, which threatens the health of the Great Barrier Reef. Australia has made national and international commitments to conserve biodiversity and reduce our greenhouse gas emissions, but current land clearing policies are not consistent with these commitments. Stronger regulation is needed to reduce vegetation loss, such as target-based regulation, which sets a cap on land clearing and could effectively halt vegetation loss over the long term. Lasting policy reform is required, and we recommend an effective policy mix that restricts clearing, provides economic opportunities for vegetation retention, and informs the Australian community about the value of native vegetation.
2
Nelson, Rebecca. "Regulating Hidden Risks to Conservation Lands in Resource Rich Areas." University of Queensland Law Journal 40, no. 3 (January 23, 2022): 491–530. http://dx.doi.org/10.38127/uqlj.v40i3.6217.
Full textAbstract:
Australia leads the world in formally dedicating private land to environmental conservation, helping governments protect critical biodiversity without straining the public purse. In Queensland, the booming resources sector threatens this biodiversity protection, even beyond landholders’ well-recognised lack of veto power over mining approvals on their land. Three structural legal biases increase this vulnerability. To differing degrees, Queensland’s laws assume that mining affects only land under or adjoining mining tenures, overlooking scientifically likely longer-distance impacts (‘boundary bias’); they emphasise protecting built and commercial infrastructure over ecological assets, overlooking significant investment in species and ecosystems (‘infrastructure bias’); and they allow consideration of proposed mining in isolation, without considering cumulative impacts on ecological assets (‘singularity bias’). Fortunately, Queensland law and policy precedents suggest potential corrective reforms.
3
Laurent, Nathan, and Lee Duffield. "Queensland's broad-scale land-clearing policy debate, 1998–2006: An analysis of evidence-based arguments in news media content." Queensland Review 25, no. 1 (June 2018): 70–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/qre.2018.8.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractThis article outlines the methodology and key findings of a media content analysis of news reporting in the Courier-Mail and Queensland Country Life on the issue of broad-scale land-clearing (BSLC) in Queensland during the period 1998–2006. The case study identifies and examines evidence-based arguments made by stakeholders in the public policy debate surrounding BSLC, including elected officials and judges, interest groups, government agencies, scientists, business owners and individuals, such as academics. In both newspapers, it was noted that throughout the period under review, arguments made on environmental grounds in favour of the policy goal of maximum immediate conservation tended to be concerned with establishing an accurate definition of the BSLC problem. However, reporting of arguments made on political and economic grounds reflected stark differences between the two newspapers. The findings of this study support observations that some participants in a contest over new policy may dispute (persistently, and regardless of previous developments) the validity of: (1) definitions of a problem; (2) proposed policy solutions; (3) matters of detail or technical application; and (4) the enactment and implementation of legislation.
4
Cotter, John. "Projects and the community—coexistence in practice." APPEA Journal 54, no. 2 (2014): 478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/aj13051.
Full textAbstract:
Strong domestic and global demand for energy will continue to drive further gas exploration and development across Australia over coming years. From Queensland’s onshore gas industry experience the key foundation stones that have helped to build community trust have included: clear and unambiguous industry policy for resources and agriculture; science based approach to managing and monitoring groundwater; fair and balanced approach to land access; greater transparency on industry data and activities; investment in long term community infrastructure such as roads and telecommunications; and genuine opportunities for local businesses to grow and succeed. Queensland has this year also introduced a new regional planning framework that seeks to control what is appropriate development in areas of agricultural and environmental significance. The new approach gives landholders and communities a greater say upfront on how onshore gas and resource developments can occur. As other East Coast States grapple to establish their own onshore gas industry, there is still much more to be done in Queensland as the major CSG-LNG export projects move from construction to operation and ongoing gas well development programs are rolled out into new areas and communities. In addition, exploration by the emerging shale gas industry is bringing similar community engagement challenges to other parts of the Queensland. Formally established as an independent statutory body less than 12 months ago, the GasFields Commission Queensland seeks to manage and oversee the relationship between landholders, regional communities and the onshore gas industry in Queensland. It has and will continue to play an important role in helping identify and address community expectations about how the onshore gas industry develops and evolves.
5
Bowen, M. K., and F. Chudleigh. "Grazing pressure, land condition, productivity and profitability of beef cattle grazing buffel grass pastures in the subtropics of Australia: a modelling approach." Animal Production Science 58, no. 8 (2018): 1451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/an17780.
Full textAbstract:
There is widespread evidence that beef cattle land managers in Queensland are using stocking rates for perennial pastures that are substantially higher than recommended guidelines, and some indication that these decisions are motivated by perceived financial and economic benefits. Considerable effort has been, and is currently being, applied by public-sector organisations to encourage producers to reduce grazing pressure from beef cattle across Queensland’s pastoral lands. A better understanding of the relationships among stocking rate, land condition and profitability of beef-grazing enterprises is imperative to better inform cattle producers and policy makers. The present study assessed the effect of grazing pressure and land condition on the productivity and profitability of a steer-turnover enterprise utilising buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris) pastures in central Queensland. A property-level, regionally relevant herd model was used to determine whole-of-business productivity and profitability over a 30-year investment period. Growth paths for steers from weaning to marketing were developed for 16 scenarios encompassing a range of pasture-utilisation rates (30%, 35% and 50% of annual biomass growth), land condition (A, B and C) and market targets (feedlot entry at 474 kg or slaughter at 605 kg). The economic effect of each scenario was assessed by comparison to a base scenario of 30% pasture utilisation and turn-off of slaughter steers. Our analyses demonstrated a large economic advantage from increasing grazing pressure above 30% utilisation for buffel grass pastures, even with assumptions of declining land condition and animal performance. For instance, producing slaughter steers under a 50% pasture-utilisation regime with a continuous decline in land condition from A to C (and, hence, productivity) over Years 10–30 was AU$21 772/annum more profitable than was a 30% pasture-utilisation strategy, which is widely recommended as closer to a long-term, safe utilisation rate. The present research has provided insights into the relationship between grazing pressure and economic returns of beef producers over the medium term. However, it should be considered as a scoping study due to the paucity of data for effects of utilisation rate on the productivity of buffel grass pastures and, hence, on land-condition rating. Further research is required to better understand the effects of utilisation rate of buffel grass, and other sown pasture grass and legume species, on plant biomass production, plant-diet quality for cattle, land-condition decline and cattle productivity.
6
Thorburn, P. J., I. J. Gordon, and S. McIntyre. "Soil and water salinity in Queensland: the prospect of ecological sustainability through the implementation of land clearing policy." Rangeland Journal 24, no. 1 (2002): 133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/rj02007.
Full textAbstract:
In Queensland, legislation has recently been enacted that outlines minimum standards for the retention of native vegetation in bioregions and prescribes Performance Requirements for the maintenance of biodiversity and ecological processes, and the prevention of land degradation. It also details Acceptable Solutions to satisfy the Performance Requirements. It this paper we analyse the links between science and action to determine whether the legislation and associated policy are likely to lead to sound management decisions being made for prevention of land and water salinity. We also compared the requirements for biodiversity protection relative to those for salinity control. For salinity (and biodiversity) the minimum standards and Acceptable Solutions in the legislation have a sound technical basis. The main challenge in implementing the salinity Performance Requirements will be provision of information required to assess salinity risk at appropriate scales. This information is: (1) salinity hazard assessment at catchment/regional scale planning scale; (2) technical information to support a sub-catchment scale implementation; (3) guidelines, procedures and local expertise for interpretation of salinity hazard at the property scale. In the process of assessing clearing applications there is no formal role for planners or decision makers at the sub-catchment level who could play an important role in coordinating information gathering for land managers developing clearing applications. There are also limited pathways for accessing relevant scientific information and expertise at an appropriate level to provide support for land managers. We suggest that this situation is likely to limit the successful implementation of the policy for preventing land and water salinity. The minimum standard of 30% retained vegetation would provide similar protection for biodiversity and salinity control at the bioregional level. In smaller areas (e.g. an individual property) however, there could be contrasting requirements for the retention of vegetation.
7
Walter, A. C., and C. J. Jones. "ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION OF THE UPSTREAM GAS INDUSTRY IN QUEENSLAND: A NEW APPROACH." APPEA Journal 38, no. 2 (1998): 160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/aj97089.
Full textAbstract:
The environmental regulation of the upstream gas industry in Queensland is based on the principles of ecologically sustainable development. There is an increasing emphasis on meeting the expectations of the general community with respect to impact assessment, the environmental performance of the industry and the ability of government to provide effective regulation. In Australian States, regulation of the industry is generally characterised by a combination of industry self-regulation and government licensing and co-regulation policies.Environmental administration and regulation in Queensland, that is, impact assessment, planning and monitoring of performance, is undertaken by the Department of Mines and Energy, primarily through Regional Offices. Direction is provided principally by Department policy and the Environmental Protection Act.Case studies are presented which illustrate the impact assessment processes for three different types of gas development projects: gas field development in southwest Queensland; construction of a gas pipeline; and development of a coal seam methane project.The Queensland Government is currently developing an Environmental Protection Policy for the upstream petroleum industry (the EPP (Petroleum)). The process of developing the EPP has involved considerable community and stakeholder input to encourage acceptance of the Policy by all parties. The process has identified several key issues for industry including: the need for multiple land use; the incremental nature of petroleum development (including the gas industry); the need to strengthen the impact assessment process; the need for an integrated, single agency regulatory regime; the need for greater accountability of both industry and government; and the need for adequate resourcing of environmental regulation.A possible new regulatory regime for the industry in Queensland, based on the co-regulation model, may include a two-tier system of impact assessment and a combination of compliance for operations with Codes of Practice or a project specific Environmental Management Plan and licences for emissions and certain high impact activities.The administrative framework would be provided by the Petroleum Act which is currently undergoing a major review.
8
Finch, N. A., and G. S. Baxter. "Oh deer, what can the matter be? Landholder attitudes to deer management in Queensland." Wildlife Research 34, no. 3 (2007): 211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/wr06002.
Full textAbstract:
Deer are not native to Australia but have been present in the country for more than 150 years. For most of that time they have not been regarded as either an agricultural or environmental pest, but in the last few years there have been calls for their numbers to be reduced. Four species of deer can be found in well established populations in Queensland, mostly occurring on private land. Hence the effectiveness of any management of deer as pests will be heavily influenced by the actions of the land owners. This paper reports on a survey of the attitudes of landholders towards deer on their properties. A total of 2621 surveys was mailed to landowners and managers in regions known to support wild deer in Queensland. Of the 28.3% of surveys returned, over 75% of respondents conducted some form of primary production on their land and 65% of these had deer on their properties at least some of the time. Responses to questions were mostly uniform throughout the state, with over 50% of respondents wanting the deer population to stay at current levels or increase. Only 5% of respondents supported poisoning as a management strategy, with 17% supporting trapping. Recreational hunting and game-meat harvesting were favoured management options, with 42% and 51% support respectively. Only 25% of respondents thought wild deer caused environmental damage and 30% thought wild deer caused agricultural damage, with most associating wild deer as a less significant pest than those species already declared under state legislation. Of those surveyed, 56% agreed with the statement ‘It is important to maintain wild deer populations for future generations to enjoy’. The spread of deer in Australia is of increasing concern to ecologists, and there have been calls for action to reduce their numbers on private and public land. The results of this survey imply that a significant proportion of Queensland landholders would resist legislation aimed at managing deer as a pest in areas with long-established wild deer populations.
9
Osunkoya, Olusegun O., Claire Lock, Joshua C. Buru, Brad Gray, and Moya Calvert. "Spatial extent of invasiveness and invasion stage categorisation of established weeds of Queensland, Australia." Australian Journal of Botany 68, no. 8 (2020): 557. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/bt20066.
Full textAbstract:
The risk posed by invasive alien species is determined primarily by two factors: distribution (occupancy) and abundance (density). However, most ecological studies use distribution data for monitoring and assessment programs, but few incorporate abundance data due to financial and logistical constraints. Failure to take into account invaders’ abundance may lead to imprecise pest risk assessments. Since 2003 as part of the Annual Pest Distribution Survey (APDS) exercise in the state of Queensland, Australia, government biosecurity officials have collected data on distribution and abundance of more than 100 established and emerging weeds. This data acquisition was done at spatial grid sizes of 17–50 × 17–50 km and across a very broad and varied geographical land area of ~2 × 106 km2. The datasets provide an opportunity to compare weed dynamics at large-medium spatial scales. Analysis of the APDS datasets indicated that weed distributions were highest in regions along the southern and central, coastal parts of Queensland, and decreased in the less populated inland (i.e. western) and northern parts of the state. Weed abundance showed no discernible landscape or regional trends. Positive distribution–abundance relationships were also detected at multiple spatial scales. Using both traits of weed abundance and distribution, we derived a measure of invasion severity, and constructed, for several (64) weed species, ‘space-for-time’ invasion curves. State-wide and in each of Queensland’s 10 regions, we also categorised the invasion stages of these weeds. At the grassroots of local government area or regional levels, the derived invasion curves and stage categories can provide policy direction for long-term management planning of Queensland’s priority weeds.
10
Karfs, R. A., B. N. Abbott, P. F. Scarth, and J. F. Wallace. "Land condition monitoring information for reef catchments: a new era." Rangeland Journal 31, no. 1 (2009): 69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/rj08060.
Full textAbstract:
Land condition monitoring information is required for the strategic management of grazing land and for a better understanding of ecosystem processes. Yet, for policy makers and those land managers whose properties are situated within north-eastern Australia’s vast Great Barrier Reef catchments, there has been a general lack of geospatial land condition monitoring information. This paper provides an overview of integrated land monitoring activity in rangeland areas of two major Reef catchments in Queensland: the Burdekin and Fitzroy regions. The project aims were to assemble land condition monitoring datasets that would assist grazing land management and support decision-makers investing public funds; and deliver these data to natural resource management (NRM) community groups, which had been given increased responsibility for delivering local environmental outcomes. We describe the rationale and processes used to produce new land condition monitoring datasets derived from remotely sensed Landsat thematic mapper (TM) and high resolution SPOT 5 satellite imagery and from rapid land condition ground assessment. Specific products include subcatchment groundcover change maps, regional mapping of indicative very poor land condition, and stratified land condition site summaries. Their application, integration, and limitations are discussed. The major innovation is a better understanding of NRM issues with respect to land condition across vast regional areas, and the effective transfer of decision-making capacity to the local level. Likewise, with an increased ability to address policy questions from an evidence-based position, combined with increased cooperation between community, industry and all levels of government, a new era has emerged for decision-makers in rangeland management.
Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Queensland land policy"
1
Anstey, Geoff. "The choice between rural living and agriculture : implications for land use and subdivision policy /." [St. Lucia, Qld], 2004. http://www.library.uq.edu.au/pdfserve.php?image=thesisabs/absthe18218.pdf.
Full text
2
Bowie, Russell Reid. "Nor any drop to drink' : an analysis by case study of the role of the institutional framework in the in the co-ordination of water resource management and urban and regional planning with particular reference to the control of land uses and land management practices in the catchment areas of water storages." Thesis, Queensland University of Technology, 1987. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/36254/1/36254_Bowie_1991.pdf.
Full textAbstract:
The role of urban and regional planning in the process of
government has expanded considerably in recent years. The
last two decades have seen unparalleled growth in the
breadth and sophistication of planning schemes throughout
Australia yet during this period attempts to relate land use planning to the other activities of government have met with limited success resulting in a complex mix of land use controls for various purposes. This study examines, in the context of the management of water storage catchments, the relationships between those agencies interested in the control of land uses for water quality purposes and the traditional land use planning authorities, with particular reference to the way in which the institutional framework of government provides for co-ordination between them.
Books on the topic "Queensland land policy"
1
Jeannie, Sim, ed. Thematic study of the cultural landscape of Queensland. Brisbane: Cultural Landscape Research Unit, Queensland University of Technology, 2001.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Queensland land policy"
1
Regan, Michael, and Bhishna Bajracharya. "Integrating Regional and Infrastructure Planning." In Advances in Environmental Engineering and Green Technologies, 259–76. IGI Global, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-775-6.ch018.
Full textAbstract:
Economic and social infrastructure provision presents a conundrum for urban planners, especially in high growth regional economies experiencing strong population growth, increasing demand for infrastructure services and limits to the state’s capacity to sustain long-term investment strategies. This chapter considers the South East Queensland (SEQ) regional economy and the policy decisions taken in recent years to embed and integrate both regional planning and regional infrastructure investment strategies through statutory SEQ Regional Plan and SEQ Infrastructure Plans and Programs. This case study examines the benefits from this integrated approach, as well as the challenges facing the region. Some of the benefits of the integrated approach include land use transport integration, strategic approach to infrastructure provision, alignment of infrastructure planning with budgetary processes, and greater certainty for investments in the regional economy. The challenges for integrated planning are also numerous, and include: ensuing close co-operation between three levels of government and private sector, reconciling long term infrastructure planning with short term political imperatives, managing future uncertainty and financing future investments in land use and infrastructure.