Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Qualitative research; systematic review; evidence-based practice / Books

Books on the topic 'Qualitative research; systematic review; evidence-based practice'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Qualitative research; systematic review; evidence-based practice.

Author: Grafiati

Published: 10 December 2022

Last updated: 28 January 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 19 books for your research on the topic 'Qualitative research; systematic review; evidence-based practice.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse books on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Royal Society of Medicine (Great Britain), ed. Systematic reviews to support evidence-based medicine: How to review and apply findings of healthcare research. 2nd ed. London: Hodder Annold, 2011.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

1953-, Mulrow Cynthia D., and Cook Deborah 1960-, eds. Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for health care decisions. Philadelphia, Pa: American College of Physicians, 1998.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Making Sense of Evidence-Based Practice for Nursing: An Introduction to Quantitative and Qualitative Research and Systematic Reviews. Routledge, 2022.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Making Sense of Evidence-Based Practice for Nursing: An Introduction to Quantitative and Qualitative Research and Systematic Reviews. Routledge, 2022.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Evans, Debra. Making Sense of Evidence-Based Practice for Nursing: An Introduction to Quantitative and Qualitative Research and Systematic Reviews. Taylor & Francis Group, 2022.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Evans, Debra. Making Sense of Evidence-Based Practice for Nursing: An Introduction to Quantitative and Qualitative Research and Systematic Reviews. Taylor & Francis Group, 2022.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Evans, Debra. Making Sense of Evidence-Based Practice for Nursing: An Introduction to Quantitative and Qualitative Research and Systematic Reviews. Taylor & Francis Group, 2022.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Burns, Tom, and Mike Firn. Research and development. Edited by Tom Burns and Mike Firn. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198754237.003.0029.

Full text

Abstract:

This chapter covers the spectrum of routine monitoring, audit, service evaluation, and formal research. Routine monitoring is an essential task for all mental health professionals, and techniques to make it more palatable are explored, including using routine data for clinical supervision and monitoring team targets. Regular audit is described as an essential tool for logical service development and quality improvement. In the discussion of research, the importance of choosing the correct methodology and of paying attention to detail are stressed. In community psychiatry, sampling bias, regression to the mean, and the Hawthorne effect pose important risks. The hierarchy of research methods is outlined with randomized controlled trials (RCTs) at the top, preferably with either single- or double-blinding. Careful statistics and systematic reviews support evidence-based practice. In addition to experimental quantitative trials, there is a place for cohort and case control trials, as well as for qualitative trials to generate hypotheses.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Christine, Webb, and Roe Brenda H, eds. Reviewing research evidence for nursing practice: Systematic reviews. Oxford: Blackwell Pub., 2007.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

(Editor), Christine Webb, ed. Reviewing Research Evidence for Nursing Practice: Systematic Reviews. Wiley-Blackwell, 2007.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Khan, Khalid Saeed, and Javier Zamora. Systematic Reviews to Support Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Appraise, Conduct and Publish Reviews. Taylor & Francis Group, 2022.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Khan, Khalid Saeed, and Javier Zamora. Systematic Reviews to Support Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Appraise, Conduct and Publish Reviews. Taylor & Francis Group, 2022.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Khan, Khalid Saeed, and Javier Zamora. Systematic Reviews to Support Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Appraise, Conduct and Publish Reviews. Taylor & Francis Group, 2022.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Khan, Khalid Saeed, and Javier Zamora. Systematic Reviews to Support Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Appraise, Conduct and Publish Reviews. CRC Press LLC, 2022.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Khan, Khalid Saeed, and Javier Zamora. Systematic Reviews to Support Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Appraise, Conduct and Publish Reviews. CRC Press LLC, 2022.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Ribeiro, Jaime, Ellen Synthia Fernandes de Oliveira, Cleoneide Oliveira, Brígida Mónica Faria, and Lucimara Fornari, eds. New trends in qualitative health research: the pandemic aftermath. Ludomedia, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.13.2022.e733.

Full text

Abstract:

With the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have seen new ways of doing things emerge. Various aspects of everyday life have been digitalized. What was once face-to-face, in context, is now done at a distance. For better or worse, healthcare and health research also had repercussions. On the one hand, there were aspects that improved, while others left something to be desired. I will not list them, because they have already been widely debated and it is now important to discuss what brought us to this page. In the particular field of qualitative research in health, also evident in this edition of NTQR, new trends can be observed in the way of researching, collecting data and producing results. We can even say that the successive confinements and constraints in data collection in the field have led us to a more reflexive process, to look more at what others have produced. We have seen, in the different scientific areas, an increase in literature reviews and other ways of collecting data, such as those latent on the internet. But this is not necessarily harmful, on the contrary, it has created opportunities to map and systematise knowledge. Not reinventing the wheel, but noting the "wheels" that exist, what is done, what needs to be done, innovating and finding ways to improve healthcare in its different perspectives. Perhaps due to better accessibility to data and easier logistics, scoping reviews, for example, sprang up, which, based on the qualitative approach, are one of the best ways to establish the state of the art of what we want to know. We have also observed a growth in thinking outside the box, using visual methods to gather information, such as images and even videographic analysis. We live overwhelmed with communications, content created and exchanges of information, by ordinary citizens, service users, professionals, scientists and many other people. A vast amount of unexplored data that has now emerged, perhaps because the imposed brake of our routines has led us to look more reflectively and give it a chance. All this to say that the more sedentary research has not only changed the vision of doing scientifically valid research but has also reinvented processes for obtaining data that are visible, but that were rarely used. Systematizing dispersed knowledge, shortens the time and resources spent and accelerates the acquisition of skills and, as is often said, the practice based on evidence. The evidence exists, perhaps it is not within everyone's reach, so it is no disrespect to gather, systematize, facilitate the interpretation and publish knowledge produced by others. To research from the office in a protocoled and structured way, is to produce knowledge, which should be poured and drunk by those without access and without availability to start investigations from scratch. Sometimes the best knowledge has already been produced, let us guide its discovery!

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Systematic Reviews : Synthesis of Best Evidence for Health Care Decisions. American College of Physicians, 1998.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Martinho Belchior, Alirio, Carlos Mascarenhas, Maha Othman, Marília Rua, Mari Takashima, Marta Silva, Laila Albalushi, et al. iNURSING JOURNAL - Manual for Authors: The step-by-step instructions guide. International Nursing School Ltd., 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.52457/qprz4666.

Full text

Abstract:

The iNursing Journal (iNJ) is the official journal of the International Nursing School (INS) and intends to disseminate the evidence-based nursing and health care, contributing to the advancement of relevant knowledge in the fields of clinic, management, education, research, advice, as well as to support decisions in public policies. The iNJ is an international journal that intends to receive proposals for publication from over the world, defending cultural diversity, as well as a diversity of contexts and of theoretical-methodological approaches that inform professionals, users, and political stakeholders for their decision-making. The articles published in iNJ must make clear their international knowledge translation and show a critical-reflective, scientific, theoretical and culturally sensitive approach. Although iNJ is mainly dedicated to research in nursing and health sciences, there are no restrictions on articles’ authorship, if they fit the requirements and format of the iNJ. In fact, the iNJ addresses and welcomes articles in health sciences and nursing. The journal publishes randomized trials, observational studies, qualitative research, systematic reviews, scoping reviews, among others. All articles submitted will be subject to double-blind peer review. The iNJ has an Editorial Team headed by the Editor-in-Chief that additionally has the assistance of the Deputy Editor-in-Chief, Editorial Team Members, and Reviewers. The Editorial Team in addition, is supported by an Office Administrator. Members of the Editorial Team meet regularly to evaluate the iNJ progress and to discuss overall goals. The frequency of the Editorial Team meetings varies and depends on the specific needs of the journal. In the following sections, we start to explain the Article Submission Guidelines, including the rules, bibliographic reference standards and article submission process. Followed by the Article Preparation section, that incorporates the different documents that must be submitted, including the Author consent and terms agreement that must be duly read, fulfilled and signed, and also give examples of checklists that can be used to prepare your article for submission. Finally, we present the iNJ Ethics Statement, Duties and Policies.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Medeiros, Rodolfo de Oliveira, Elza de Fátima Ribeiro Higa, Maria José Sanches Marin, Carlos Alberto Lazarini, and Monike Alves Lemes. Investigação Qualitativa em Educação: Avanços e Desafios / Investigación Cualitativa en Educación: Avances y Desafíos. Ludomedia, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.2.2020.490-501.

Full text

Abstract:

To identify literary evidence on strategies for continuing education of undergraduate health professors. Integrative Literature Review, developed in six stages: Research question, inclusion and exclusion criteria, categorization, evaluation, interpretation and final writing. Searches were carried out in the Lilacs, Medline, Bdenf, Cumed, Scopus, Scielo, Eric and Web of Science databases. The inclusion criteria were primary studies, published between 2014 and 2020, in Portuguese, English and Spanish, which addressed the proposed theme. 32 articles were selected from which ten analytical categories emerged: Information and Communication Technology (ICT), Workshop, Design Thinking, Problem-Based Learning (PBL), Distance education (EAD), Pedagogical training courses, Reflection of practice, Bloom's Taxonomy, Skills Development and Personification. In the current educational context. There is a wide variety of teacher training strategies, in view of the specificity of each scenario. A qualitative research is a means to expand this understanding.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!