Journal articles: 'Publications'

1

Ainsworth, GC, and Grace M. Waterhouse. "Miscellaneous publications: New publication 1989." Mycologist 3, no. 2 (April 1989): 90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0269-915x(89)80091-6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Slavin, Konstantin V. "Publication world and world publications." Surgical Neurology 44, no. 1 (July 1995): 90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-3019(95)00178-6.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Woolley, Karen L. "Coincidence? Publications Expertise Boosts Publication Output." Journal of Surgical Education 71, no. 1 (January 2014): 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.10.007.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Baskaran, S. "Publications trends in big data: A scientometric analysis." IP Indian Journal of Library Science and Information Technology 6, no. 2 (February 15, 2022): 102–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.18231/j.ijlsit.2021.021.

Full text

Abstract:

The present paper is aimed at analysing the global publications trends on big data using Web of Science database for the period 2011-2020. The database contained 45249 publications. The average number of publications per year was 4524.9. There were only 1058 publications in 2011 and a continuous growth of publication was observed during the period. The highest publication 9389 was in 2020. Authors from USA have contributed maximum number of publications compared to the other countries and India stood 11in terms of productivity in this period. Publications on big data are spread over 22 languages. The study analysed the broad features of literature on big data focusing on growth rate of publications, most prolific authors, country wise distribution of publications, highly productive institutes, language wise distribution of publications, most preferred source titles and high productivity subject areas.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Zhang, Gupeng, Libin Xiong, Xiao Wang, Jianing Dong, and Hongbo Duan. "Artificial selection versus natural selection: Which causes the Matthew effect of science funding allocation in China?" Science and Public Policy 47, no. 3 (May 3, 2020): 434–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa024.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract To investigate either artificial or natural selection leads to the Matthew effect in the science funding allocation and its consequences, this study retrieves 274,732 publications by Chinese scientists from the Web of Science and examines how the disparity of science funding determines scientists’ research performance. We employ the Negative Binomial Model and other models to regress the publication’s citation times, which measures the research performance, on the number of funding grants and their amounts of currency that the publication receives, which measures the disparity of science funding. The empirical results suggest an inverted U-shaped relationship. However, the optimum number of funding grants far exceeds the actual number that most publications receive, implying that increasing the funding for academic research positively impacts scientists’ research performance. The natural disparity thus plays a major role in distributing the science funding. Additionally, China’s publication-based academic assessment system may be another main cause.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Rasyad, Iqbal, and Gonda Yumitro. "Bibliometric analysis on the international publication of muslim brotherhood." Communications in Humanities and Social Sciences 3, no. 1 (July 30, 2023): 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.21924/chss.3.1.2023.54.

Full text

Abstract:

This article analyzes the trend of international publications related to the Muslim Brotherhood using the Scopus database. This study aims to determine the publication trends by region, subject area of publication, type of publication, number of documents for each author, and number of papers for each university. The data collected by the authors were taken from the search results in the Scopus database with a combination of the keywords "Ikhwanul Muslimin or Muslim Brotherhood" with the categories of article titles, article abstracts, and article keywords in the publication period of 1954 - 2023. Based on this search, the authors found 738 scientific publication documents related to the Muslim Brotherhood. The studies conducted in 2023 were 17 publications, and the highest number found by the authors was 69 scientific publications (9.3%) in 2016. The United States became the most productive country or region in scientific publications with 175 papers (23.7%). The most prolific authors are Ardovini and Brooke with eight articles. Bar-Ilan University became the affiliate with the most publications with 15 publications. Based on these results, the study of the Muslim Brotherhood became a contemporary study that has attracted the interest of researchers.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Mokhnacheva, Yulia V. "On physico-chemical biology in Russia from the perspective of studying the dynamics of an array of publications." Science management: theory and practice 2, no. 3 (2020): 113–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.19181/smtp.2020.2.3.7.

Full text

Abstract:

The article presents an analysis of the current state of the Russian segment of publications on physical and chemical biology (PCB) in the international database Web of Science Core Collection (WoS CC) for the period 2000–2019. The main task of the study is to analyze the dynamics of changes in the arrays of Russian publications in the field of physical and chemical biology, including determining the average citation rate of publications; analysis of the impact of international cooperation on publication activity; identification of leaders at the level of research institutions and individual specialists. The study is based on a bibliometric analysis of publication arrays presented in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoS CC) database for the period 2000–2019. It is shown that after a period of decline in publication activity, starting in 2015, previously lost positions in the share of publications in the world array were restored in Russia. However, the citation of Russian publications lags significantly behind the performance of the of the main competitor countries. It is shown that Russian publications without foreign participation are cited 3–4 times less often than workswith foreign co-authorship. Throughout the entire study period, there was an increase in the number of co-authors in publications, as well as the share of publications made with the participation of five or more co-authors: by 2019, such publications accounted for almost 64%, in 2000 there were about 40% of such publications. It is shown that the main contribution to the Russian documentary stream on physical and chemical biology is made by the research institutes of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RI RAS) – 68% of publications and 67% of all citations. Research institutes of the Russian Academy of Sciences have a significant impact on the publication activity of universities: in the period 2012–2019. The share of joint publications of universities and research institutes of the Russian Academy of Sciences was 55% of the array of university documents and 62% of all citations to university publications. The article presents the ratings of Russian scientific organizations by the share of publications in the Russian array in the field of physicochemical biology, as well as scientists by the largest number of publications and the highest average citation.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Böckmann, Eva C., E. S. Debus, and R. T. Grundmann. "Publication activity of chief and consultant general/visceral surgeons in German university hospitals—a ten-year analysis." Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 406, no. 5 (July 26, 2021): 1659–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02241-6.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Purpose The publication activity of 38 German general/visceral surgery university departments, documented by first or last authorship from staff surgeons (chief and consultants), was evaluated. Methods The observation period extended from 2007 to 2017 and all PubMed-listed publications were considered. Impact factor (IF) was evaluated through the publishing journal’s 5-year IF in 2016, as was the IF for each individual publication. Ranking was expressed in quartiles. Results The staff surgeons of the 38 departments comprised 442 surgeons, of which only 351 (79.4%) were active as first or last authors. Four thousand six hundred and ninety-nine publications published in 702 journals were recorded. The four leading departments in publication number published as much as the last 20 departments (1330 vs. 1336 publications, respectively). The mean of the first (most active) department quartile was 19.6 publications, the second 15.4, the third 11.0, and the last quartile 7.6 per publishing surgeon. The total cumulative impact factor was 14,130. When examining the mean number of publications per publishing surgeons per the 10 year period, the mean of the first quartile was 57.9 cumulative IF, the second 45.0, the third 29.5, and the fourth quartile 17.1. With 352 (7.5%) publications, the most frequently used journal was Chirurg, followed by Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery with 274 (5.8%) publications. Pancreas-related topics led in terms of publication number and IF generated per individual publication. Conclusion A significant difference in publication performance of individual departments was apparent that cannot be explained by staff number. This indicates that there are as yet unknown factors responsible for minor publication activity in many university departments.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Forrester, MB. "Bibliometric analysis of poison center-related research published in peer-review journals." Human & Experimental Toxicology 35, no. 7 (August 3, 2015): 705–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0960327115598386.

Full text

Abstract:

Poison centers advance knowledge in the field of toxicology through publication in peer-review journals. This investigation describes the pattern of poison center-related publications. Cases were poison center-related research published in peer-review journals during 1995–2014. These were identified through searching the PubMed database, reviewing the tables of contents of selected toxicology journals, and reviewing abstracts of various national and international meetings. The following variables for each publication were identified: year of publication, journal, type of publication (meeting abstract vs. other, i.e. full article or letter to the editor), and the country(ies) of the poison center(s) included in the research. Of the 3147 total publications, 62.1% were meeting abstracts. There were 263 publications in 1995–1999, 536 in 2000–2004, 999 in 2005–2009, and 1349 in 2010–2014. The publications were in 234 different journals. The journals in which the highest number of research was published were Clinical Toxicology (69.7%), Journal of Medical Toxicology (2.2%), and Veterinary and Human Toxicology (2.1%). The research was reported from 62 different countries. The countries with the highest number of publications were the United States (67.9%), United Kingdom (6.5%), Germany (3.9%), France (2.5%), and Italy (2.4%). The number of publications increased greatly over the 20 years. Although the publications were in a large number of journals, a high proportion of the publications were in one journal. While the research came from a large number of countries, the preponderance came from the United States.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Nemtsov, A. V., E. A. Kuznetsova-Moreva, and V. V. Shein. "Zero Citation in Russian Medical Science, 1990–2017." Economics of Science 6, no. 3 (October 15, 2020): 199–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.22394/2410-132x-2020-6-3-199-208.

Full text

Abstract:

A scientometric study of 51 research institutes of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation was carried out. 139,342 publications registered in the Russian Science Citation Index in 1950-2017, were the material of the study. We studied the distribution of publications by year of publication and the number of citations. The publications were divided into two groups: 1) cited one or more times (n = 65395 or 46.9%) and 2) with zero citation (n = 73946 or 53.1%). In 2001-2016 the total number of publications increases linearly (regression coefficient 721 publications or 10% per year). At the same time, the share of cited publications decreased from 72% in 2001 to 46% in 2014, and later, to 4% in 2017. During the period of the highest publication activity (2000-2013), the proportion of cited publications ranged from 17 % to 81% in different institutions (median 61%). The proportion of cited publications may be an indicator of the effectiveness of institutions.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Liaw, Winston, Andrew W. Bazemore, Bernard Ewigman, Tanvir Chowdhury Turin, Daniel McCorry, Stephen Petterson, and Susan M. Dovey. "Advancing bibliometric assessment of research productivity: an analysis of US Departments of Family Medicine." Journal of Primary Health Care 12, no. 2 (2020): 149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/hc19098.

Full text

Abstract:

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMeasurement of family medicine research productivity has lacked the replicable methodology needed to document progress. AIMIn this study, we compared three methods: (1) faculty-to-publications; (2) publications-to-faculty; and (3) department-reported publications. METHODSIn this cross-sectional analysis, publications in peer-reviewed, indexed journals for faculty in 13 US family medicine departments in 2015 were assessed. In the faculty-to-publications method, department websites to identify faculty and Web of Science to identify publications were used. For the publications-to-faculty method, PubMed’s author affiliation field were used to identify publications, which were linked to faculty members. In the department-reported method, chairs provided lists of faculty and their publications. For each method, descriptive statistics to compare faculty and publication counts were calculated. RESULTSOverall, 750 faculty members with 1052 unique publications, using all three methods combined as the reference standard, were identified. The department-reported method revealed 878 publications (84%), compared to 616 (59%) for the faculty-to-publications method and 412 (39%) for the publication-to-faculty method. Across all departments, 32% of faculty had any publications, and the mean number of publications per faculty was 1.4 (mean of 4.4 per faculty among those who had published). Assistant Professors, Associate Professors, Professors and Chairs accounted for 92% of all publications. DISCUSSIONOnline searches capture a fraction of publications, but also capture publications missed through self-report. The ideal methodology includes all three. Tracking publications is important for quantifying the return on our discipline’s research investment.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Kanagasundari, S., G. T. Kohila, and N. Prasannakumari. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Authorship Productivity and Collaborative Research in Blogosphere." Asian Journal of Information Science and Technology 9, S1 (February 5, 2019): 92–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.51983/ajist-2019.9.s1.214.

Full text

Abstract:

An analysis of 718 publications published by social area on Blogosphere during 2002-2018 and indexed by web of science online Database indicates that the publication output in the Global Research Publications. The highest numbers of papers were published during the year 2010 and 2013 with 76 records, the followed by 72 papers in 2009, 69 papers in 2015 and 67 records of the publication in the year 2011. The least number of publication in the years 2002, 2003 and 2004 with only one record of the publications due to the initial stage of web developments. Overall, 1368 authors contributed 520 publications in the journal and institutions with 668 records of the articles. Contribution of journals, ranking of authors, preference of publication and frequency of keywords were also analysed in this paper.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Komala Putri, Ratna, Ernie Tisnawati Sule, Nury Effendi, and Hilmiana . "The Academic Climate and Organizational Support Influence on Performance of Lecturers Scientific Publications (Study at the Private University Accredited in West Java)." International Journal of Engineering & Technology 7, no. 3.30 (August 24, 2018): 567. http://dx.doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.30.18432.

Full text

Abstract:

Objective - This article aims to produce a study of: Academic climate, organizational support and the performance of scientific publications of lecturers. Then examine the influence of academic climate and organizational support on the performance of lecturer scientific publications. Research on the performance of scientific publications is still very rare, let alone linking the issue to the academic climate and organizational support. So that research on this scientific publication should be done immediately so that scientific publications of lecturers in Indonesia can increase, especially the performance of scientific publications of lecturers at the private university in West Java.Method - The research design used in this research is mixed method Research (MMR). The analytical tool uses a Partial Lease Square.Findings - Scientific publications of lecturers will increase both in quantity and quality if conducive academic climate and organizational support activities. Academic climate and organizational support affect the performance of lecturer scientific publications, either partially or simultaneously. Simultaneously influence the academic climate and organizational support to Performance of Scientific Publication of Lecturers, amounted to 54,4%. While partially Academic climate and Organizational Support influential significantly to Performance of Scientific Publication of Lecturers, which is Academic climate has a greater influence (34,8%).

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Kumar, Amit, Soni Rajput, Manjunath P. Puranik, and Ankit Mahesh Patel. "Deciphering dimensions of overlapping publications." Journal of Global Oral Health 4 (December 31, 2021): 123–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/jgoh_48_2020.

Full text

Abstract:

Proving research efficiency and academic growth by the number of publications flag the researchers to publish more articles from a single dataset. They are crossing into unethical practices such as self-plagiarism, duplicate publication, and other research misconducts, which warrant disciplinary action against them. The thrust of this review is to draw the attention of the authors, reviewers, editors, and readers toward different dimensions of overlapping publications in research. Various guidelines and ethical bodies such as Committee on Publication Ethics and International Committee of Medical Journal Editors were considered for the review. The present review provides an expansive outline of publication overlap available in the literature. The reasons for conducting and problems associated with different types of overlapping publications are identified. Preventive and remedial measures as well as recommendations for authors, editors, and reviewers have been highlighted. Because of the strain to “publish or perish” from the researchers’ end, journals are ending up being flooded with overlapping publications.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Gerrits, Reinie G., Michael J. van den Berg, Anton E. Kunst, Niek S. Klazinga, and Dionne S. Kringos. "Reporting health services research to a broader public: An exploration of inconsistencies and reporting inadequacies in societal publications." PLOS ONE 16, no. 4 (April 7, 2021): e0248753. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248753.

Full text

Abstract:

Introduction Little is known about the accuracy of societal publications (e.g. press releases, internet postings or professional journals) that are based on scientific work. This study investigates a) inconsistencies between scientific peer-reviewed health services research (HSR) publications and non-scientific societal publications and b) replication of reporting inadequacies from these scientific publications to corresponding societal publications. Methods A sample of HSR publications was drawn from 116 publications authored in 2016 by thirteen Dutch HSR institutions. Societal publications corresponding to scientific publications were identified through a systematic internet search. We conducted a qualitative, directed content analysis on societal publications derived from the scientific publications to assess both reporting inadequacies and determine inconsistencies. Descriptive frequencies were calculated for all variables. Odds ratios were used to investigate whether inconsistencies in societal publications were less likely when the first scientific author was involved. Results We identified 43 scientific and 156 societal publications. 94 societal publications (60.3%), (associated with 32 scientific publications (74.4%)) contained messages that were inconsistent with the scientific work. We found reporting inadequacies in 22 scientific publications (51.2%). In 45 societal publications (28.9%), we found replications of these reporting inadequacies. The likelihood of inconsistencies between scientific and societal publications did not differ when the latter explicitly involved the first scientific author, (OR = 1.44, CI: 0.76–2.74); were published on the institute’s or funder’s website, (OR = 1.32, CI: 0.57–3.06); published with no involvement of a scientific author, (OR = 0.52, CI: 0.25–1.07). Conclusion To improve societal publications, one should examine both the consistency with scientific research publications and ways to prevent replication of scientific reporting inadequacies. HSR institutions, funders, and scientific and societal publication platforms should invest in a supportive publication culture to further incentivise the responsible and skilled involvement of researchers in writing both scientific and societal publications.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Bu, Yi, Ludo Waltman, and Yong Huang. "A multidimensional framework for characterizing the citation impact of scientific publications." Quantitative Science Studies 2, no. 1 (2021): 155–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00109.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract The citation impact of a scientific publication is usually seen as a one-dimensional concept. We introduce a multidimensional framework for characterizing the citation impact of a publication. In addition to the level of citation impact, quantified by the number of citations received by a publication, we also conceptualize and operationalize the depth and breadth and the dependence and independence of the citation impact of a publication. The proposed framework distinguishes between publications that have a deep citation impact, typically in a relatively narrow research area, and publications that have a broad citation impact, probably covering a wider area of research. It also makes a distinction between publications that are strongly dependent on earlier work and publications that make a more independent scientific contribution. We use our multidimensional citation impact framework to report basic descriptive statistics on the citation impact of highly cited publications in all scientific disciplines. In addition, we present a detailed case study focusing on the field of scientometrics. The proposed citation impact framework provides a more in-depth understanding of the citation impact of a publication than a traditional one-dimensional perspective.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Haunschild, Robin, and Lutz Bornmann. "Can tweets be used to detect problems early with scientific papers? A case study of three retracted COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 papers." Scientometrics 126, no. 6 (April 26, 2021): 5181–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03962-7.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractMethodological mistakes, data errors, and scientific misconduct are considered prevalent problems in science that are often difficult to detect. In this study, we explore the potential of using data from Twitter for discovering problems with publications. In this case study, we analyzed tweet texts of three retracted publications about COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease 2019)/SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) and their retraction notices. We did not find early warning signs in tweet texts regarding one publication, but we did find tweets that casted doubt on the validity of the two other publications shortly after their publication date. An extension of our current work might lead to an early warning system that makes the scientific community aware of problems with certain publications. Other sources, such as blogs or post-publication peer-review sites, could be included in such an early warning system. The methodology proposed in this case study should be validated using larger publication sets that also include a control group, i.e., publications that were not retracted.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

BRITTON, J., and A. J. KNOX. "Duplicate publication, redundant publication, and disclosure of closely related publications." Thorax 54, no. 5 (May 1, 1999): 378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thx.54.5.378.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Bain, C. R., and P. S. Myles. "Relationship between Journal Impact Factor and Levels of Evidence in Anaesthesia." Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 33, no. 5 (October 2005): 567–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0310057x0503300503.

Full text

Abstract:

Evidence-based medicine uses a hierarchy of publication types according to their vulnerability to bias. A widely used measure of journal “quality” is its impact factor, which describes the citation rate of its publications. We investigated the relationship between impact factor for eight anaesthesia journals and publication type with respect to their level of evidence 1-4 using Spearman rank correlation (rho). There were 1418 original publications during 2001 included in the analysis. The number (%) of publication types according to evidence-based medicine level were: level 1: 6 (0.4%), level 2: 533 (38%) level 3: 329 (23%), level 4: 550 (39%). There was no correlation between journal ranking according to impact factor and publication type (rho=–0.03, P=0.25). The correlation between journal rank and the proportion of publications that were randomized trials was –0.35 (P<0.001). The correlation between journal rank and number of publications was 0.65 (P<0.001). The correlation between journal rank and number of level 1 or 2 studies was 0.58 (P<0.001). The overall level of evidence published in anaesthesia journals was high. Journal rank according to impact factor is related to the number of publications, but not the proportion of publications that are evidence-based medicine level 1 or 2.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Kalabikhina, Irina E., Herman A. Klimenko, Evgeny P. Banin, Ekaterina K. Vorobyeva, and Anna D. Lameeva. "Database of digital media publications on maternal (family) capital in Russia in 2006–2019." Population and Economics 5, no. 4 (December 8, 2021): 21–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/popecon.5.e78723.

Full text

Abstract:

The database contains data from publications of digital Russian-language media registered in the Russian Federation on the topic of maternity capital published in the period from May 10, 2006 to June 30, 2019. The database includes general data on publications on maternity capital in .csv formats (UTF-8 encoding). Full texts of publications are presented in .xml format. A specialized request was generated for the aggregator of publications of Russian-language digital mass media public.ru. In total, the database consists of 457,888 publications of 7,665 publishing houses from 1,251 settlements located in 85 regions of Russia. The database includes information about the date and type of publication, publisher, place of publication (municipality), texts about maternity capital, and numbers of unique positive, negative, and neutral words and phrases according to the RuSentiLex2017 dictionary, as well as full texts of publications.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Reilly, Samantha M., Tianrong Cheng, and Jenna DuMond. "Method Validation Approaches for Analysis of Constituents in ENDS." Tobacco Regulatory Science 6, no. 4 (July 1, 2020): 242–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.18001/trs.6.4.3.

Full text

Abstract:

Objective: We assessed how many peer-reviewed publications reporting chemical quantities and/or yields from electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) have included adequate method validation characteristics in the publication for appropriate interpretation of data quality for informing tobacco regulatory science. Methods: We searched 5 databases (Web of Knowledge, PubMed, SciFinder, Embase, EBSCOhost) for ENDS publications between January 2007 and September 2018. Of the 283 publications screened, 173 publications were relevant for analysis. We identified the publications that report a certain degree of control in data quality, ie, the publications that report marginally validated methods (MVMs). MVMs refer to the methods that: (1) report 3 or more International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) method validation characteristics, (2) state the method was validated, (3) cite their own previous publication(s) that report MVMs, or (4) use a method within the accreditation scope of an accredited laboratory. Results: Overall, 97 publications (56%) report MVMs in their studies. This percentage also reflects the publication distribution for the majority of the 28 chemicals measured by MVMs. Conclusions: This study highlights the need for reporting sufficient validation characteristics following appropriate guidance to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the published analytical data for proper data interpretations that may support policy.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Risal, S., and H. N. Prasad. "Some scientific publications of BPKIHS: a bibliometric study of articles listed in the Web of Science." Health Renaissance 10, no. 2 (July 30, 2012): 139–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/hren.v10i2.6584.

Full text

Abstract:

Scientific productivity of any academic institution is expressed by the total number of publications generated by its academic faculties and the use of the publication by scientific community. Citation analysis is done to evaluate the use of the publications. Use of the publication can be studied with the help of bibliometric analysis. Counting publication, publications trends, authorship patterns and citation analysis are parts of bibliometric analysis. Web of Science is one of the best databases which allow the study in the use of the publications through citation analysis. In this article, scientific articles produced by the faculties and other international affiliated faculties of BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences have been studied. Citation analysis of scientific publications of BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences is done with the help of the Web of Science, a product of Thomason Reuters.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/hren.v10i2.6584 Health Renaissance 2012; Vol 10 (No.2); 139-143

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Sereda, A. P., and M. A. Andrianova. "Analysis of Publications of the Russian Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgeons in Foreign Top-Rated Journals." Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia 24, no. 4 (December 29, 2018): 9–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.21823/2311-2905-2018-24-4-9-19.

Full text

Abstract:

The present paper is dedicated to the publications analysis by Russian authors in top-rated foreign journals. The aim of the research to define the avant-garde status of the national trauma and orthopaedics science. The authors of the present paper analyzed the publications in the first thirty journals under the heading «Orthopaedics and sports medicine» from Scimago Journal & Country Rank rating. The search was conducted from the moment of the first issue of each journal. Total number of publications was calculated, total number of publications from each author, number of publications per institution, citations of each publication in PubMed Central и Google Scholar. The subject, chronologic characteristics and relation of the year of publication with number of citations were analyzed.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Sperry, Len. "Professional Publications: Changes and Implications for NASAP." Journal of Individual Psychology 80, no. 2 (June 2024): 161–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jip.2024.a929769.

Full text

Abstract:

ABSTRACT: Publications of most professions and their professional organizations have evolved to better meet the needs of their members. These changes are reflected in three main publication types: professional journals, professional newsletters, and professional magazines. Each is described in terms of readership, focus, content, and criteria for publication. Recent developments in professional publications are briefly described. Finally, possible implications for the publications of the North American Society of Adlerian Psychology (NASAP) are discussed.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Gupta, Rishabh, Jeffrey Chen, Steven G. Roth, Naveed Kamal, Breanne Reisen, Alex Ortiz, Michael Feldman, Nishit Mummareddy, Jacob Jo, and Lola Blackwell Chambless. "819 Pre-residency Research Output Amongst U.S. Neurological Surgery Residents." Neurosurgery 70, Supplement_1 (April 2024): 171–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000002809_819.

Full text

Abstract:

INTRODUCTION: Research productivity is often used in evaluating candidates for neurosurgery residency. Official Match data report successful candidates have on average ∼25 pre-residency research products; however, average number of indexed publications, the highest-valued research product, is not reported separate from other research products. METHODS: A list of all US neurosurgery residents who successfully matched between 2017-2021 was generated and narrowed to US MD seniors who applied to the authors’ institution. Each resident’s pre-residency publication quantity was extracted using Scopus. Additional variables were extracted from residency applications. RESULTS: 93.2% of all matched neurosurgery applicants from 2017 through 2021 were captured. Distribution of publication quantity was right skewed. Mean ± SD total, neuroscience-specific, and first-author pre-residency publications for applicants who matched in 2021 were 8.1 ± 10.0, 6.6 ± 8.7, and 2.3 ± 3.8 respectively. Median (IQR) total, neuroscience-specific, and first-author pre-residency publications were 5.0 (2.0, 11.0), 4.0 (1.5, 9.0), and 1.0 (0.0, 3.0) respectively. There was a statistically significant increase in average total, neuroscience-specific, and first-author publications from 2017 to 2021 (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated an independent, positive association between class year and publication quantity (1.07 (0.71-1.42), p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Indexed publications constitute a small portion of total research products successful neurosurgery candidates apply with. A high number of publications is not necessary to match with approximately 50% of all applicants who successfully matched having fewer than five publications and 25% having fewer than two. That said, average pre-residency publication quantity is increasing over time at a rate of approximately one publication per year.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Cobey, Kelly D., James Galipeau, Larissa Shamseer, and David Moher. "Assessing the utility of an institutional publications officer: a pilot assessment." PeerJ 5 (May 31, 2017): e3294. http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3294.

Full text

Abstract:

Background The scholarly publication landscape is changing rapidly. We investigated whether the introduction of an institutional publications officer might help facilitate better knowledge of publication topics and related resources, and effectively support researchers to publish. Methods In September 2015, a purpose-built survey about researchers’ knowledge and perceptions of publication practices was administered at five Ottawa area research institutions. Subsequently, we publicly announced a newly hired publications officer (KDC) who then began conducting outreach at two of the institutions. Specifically, the publications officer gave presentations, held one-to-one consultations, developed electronic newsletter content, and generated and maintained a webpage of resources. In March 2016, we re-surveyed our participants regarding their knowledge and perceptions of publishing. Mean scores to the perception questions, and the percent of correct responses to the knowledge questions, pre and post survey, were computed for each item. The difference between these means or calculated percentages was then examined across the survey measures. Results 82 participants completed both surveys. Of this group, 29 indicated that they had exposure to the publications officer, while the remaining 53 indicated they did not. Interaction with the publications officer led to improvements in half of the knowledge items (7/14 variables). While improvements in knowledge of publishing were also found among those who reported not to have interacted with the publications officer (9/14), these effects were often smaller in magnitude. Scores for some publication knowledge variables actually decreased between the pre and post survey (3/14). Effects for researchers’ perceptions of publishing increased for 5/6 variables in the group that interacted with the publications officer. Discussion This pilot provides initial indication that, in a short timeframe, introducing an institutional publications officer may improve knowledge and perceptions surrounding publishing. This study is limited by its modest sample size and temporal relationship between the introduction of the publications officer and changes in knowledge and perceptions. A randomized trial examining the publications officer as an effective intervention is needed.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Singh, Keerti, Md Anwarul Azim Majumder, Subir Gupta, Uma Gaur, Bidyadhar Sa, and Oswald P. Adams. "Disparity in biomedical publication trends in the CARICOM countries: Is there a need for a more vibrant research culture in the region?" SAGE Open Medicine 8 (January 2020): 205031212095328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312120953285.

Full text

Abstract:

Background: Biomedical research and publications provide evidence-based information about the extent and burden of health-related problems of a country and help to formulate strategic and operational plans to tackle the problems. Purpose: To determine the biomedical publication rates of CARICOM full member countries. Methods: Biomedical publications of full member CARICOM countries were retrieved using PubMed (1990–2015) and SCImago Journal & Country Rank (1996–2015) databases. CARICOM countries having >50 publications in the PubMed (1990–2015) database were subject to further analysis, whereby publications of each country were adjusted by total population (million population), gross domestic product (billion-dollar), and Internet usage rate (hundred thousand population). Results: Total publications by all countries were 7281 and 8378 in PubMed and SCImago Journal & Country Rank, respectively. Jamaica produced highest number of publications (PubMed: 3928 (53.9%); SCImago Journal & Country Rank: 2850 (34.0%)). In both databases, Grenada had the highest research publications when adjusted with per million population (4721 and 10,633), per billion gross domestic product (803 and 1651), and per hundred thousand Internet users (1487 and 3387). Trend analysis revealed Jamaica produced the highest number of additional PubMed listed publications each year, averaging 4.8/year, followed by Trinidad and Tobago (4.4). According to SCImago Journal & Country Rank, Jamaica also had the highest number of citations (42,311) and h-index (76), followed by Trinidad and Tobago (29,152 and 71). Barbados had the highest number of citations per document (24.9), followed by Haiti (18.4). The publication rates determined by PubMed and SCImago Journal & Country Rank databases were significantly correlated (p < 0.001). Most publications (68% SCImago Journal & Country Rank and 85% PubMed) can be attributed to authors affiliated with Barbados, Jamaica, and Trinidad. Conclusion: Publication and citation rates varied markedly between CARICOM countries and were in general low. Most publications could be attributed to researchers affiliated with The University of the West Indies. More universities valuing biomedical research are needed in the region, and more resources needed to improve publication rates.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Carvalho, Christopher, Matthew Fuller, Emmanuel Quaidoo, Ahson Haider, Jonathan Rodriguez, Angela Wong, Mindy Duong, and Robert Rodriguez. "A Review of COVID-19-Related Publications and Lag Times During the First Six Months of the Year 2020." Western Journal of Emergency Medicine 22, no. 4 (June 29, 2021): 958–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2021.3.51737.

Full text

Abstract:

Introduction: Considering the need for information regarding approaches to prevention and treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), we sought to determine publication lag times of COVID-19-related original research articles published in top general medicine and emergency medicine (EM) journals. We further sought to characterize the types of COVID-19 publications within these journals. Methods: We reviewed 125 top-ranked general medicine journals and 20 top-ranked EM-specific journals for COVID-19-related publications. We abstracted article titles and manuscript details for each COVID-19-related article published between January 1–June 30, 2020, and categorized articles as one of the following: original research; case report; review; or commentary. We abstracted data for preprint publications over the same time period and determined whether articles from the general medicine and EM journals had been previously published as preprint articles. Our primary outcomes were the following: 1) lag time (days) between global cumulative World Health Organization (WHO)-confirmed cases of COVID-19 and publications; 2) lag times between preprint article publication and peer-reviewed journal publication; and 3) lag times between submission and publication in peer-reviewed journals. Our secondary outcome was to characterize COVID-19-related publications. Results: The first original research publications appeared in a general medicine journal 20 days and in an EM journal 58 days after the first WHO-confirmed case of COVID-19. We found median and mean lag times between preprint publications and journal publications of 32 days (19, 49) and 36 days (22) for general medicine journals, and 26 days (16, 36) and 25 days (13) for EM journals. Median and mean lag times between submission and publication were 30 days (19, 45) and 35 days (13) for general medicine journals, and 23 days (11, 39) and 27 days (19) for EM journals. Of 2530 general medicine journal articles and 351 EM journal articles, 28% and 23.6% were original research. We noted substantial closing of the preprint to peer-reviewed publication (160 days pre-pandemic) and peer-reviewed journal submission to publication (194 days pre-pandemic) lag times for COVID-19 manuscripts. Conclusion: We found a rapid and robust response with shortened publication lag times to meet the need for the publication of original research and other vital medical information related to COVID-19 during the first six months of 2020.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Kendal, Dave, Kate E. Lee, Kylie Soanes, and Caragh G. Threlfall. "‘The great publication race’ vs ‘abandon paper counting’: Benchmarking ECR publication and co-authorship rates over past 50 years to inform research evaluation." F1000Research 11 (January 26, 2022): 95. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.75604.1.

Full text

Abstract:

Background: Publication and co-authorship rates have been increasing over decades. In response, calls are being made to restrict the number of publications included in research evaluations. Yet there is little evidence to guide publication expectations and inform research evaluation for early career researchers (ECRs). Methods: Here we examine the early career publication and co-authorship records between 1970 and 2019 of >140,000 authors of 2.8 million publications, to identify how publication and co-authorship rates have changed over the last 50 years. This examination is conducted in order to develop benchmarks of median publication rates for sensibly evaluating ECR research productivity, and to explore success in meeting these benchmarks with different co-authorship strategies using regression models. Results: Publication rates of multidisciplinary ECRs publishing in Nature, Science and PNAS have increased by 46% over the last 50 years and that publications rates in a set of disciplinary journals have increased by 105%. Co-authorship rates have increased even more, particularly for the multidisciplinary sample which now has 572% more co-authors per publication. Benchmarks based on median publication rates for all authors increased from one publication per year at the start of a career, to four publications per year after 10 years of publishing, and one first-author publication across all years. The probability of meeting these benchmarks increases when authors publish with different co-authors, and first authorship rates decrease for ECRs with many co-authors per publication. Conclusion: This evidence could be used to inform sensible publishing expectations for ECRs and the institutions they work for, and to inform calls to limit the number of publications produced by researchers and those used in research evaluations.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Tupan, Tupan, and Kamaludin Kamaludin. "PUBLICATION OF RESEARCH DATA MANAGEMENT IN OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL ANALYSIS BASED ON SCOPUS DATA." BACA: JURNAL DOKUMENTASI DAN INFORMASI 41, no. 2 (December 11, 2020): 215. http://dx.doi.org/10.14203/j.baca.v41i2.701.

Full text

Abstract:

The study aims to determine: (1) the number of open access resources for research data management publications indexed by Scopus, including the year of publication, source of publication, authors, institutions, countries, types of documents and funding agencies; (2) mapping research data management based on keywords. The results of the study showed that the number of open access resources for research data management publications has started since 1981 and the number has continued to increase starting in 2014 and the highest number occurred in 2019, namely 49 publications. The most publicized journals that open access to research data management was the Data Science Journal, which was 11 publications. The most productive author of conducting research data management publications was Cox, A.M. and Pinfield, S. The largest institutions contributing to the publication of open access research data management were the University of Toronto and New York University. The countries that contributed the most were the United States with 50 publications, then China with 38 publications. The most open access research data management in the form of articles as many as 107 and 37 conference paper publications. The institutions that provided the most funding sponsors were the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the National Science Foundation. The results of keyword mapping with VOSViewer showed that big data, research data management, information management, data management, medical research topics, software, information processing, and metadata were the most researched topics.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Haryanto, Latifah Mutiara, Winny Setyonugroho, and Passakorn Suanrueang. "Analysis of Barriers Implementation Health Information Technology Using Vosviewer: A Bibliometric Study." JMMR (Jurnal Medicoeticolegal dan Manajemen Rumah Sakit) 12, no. 3 (December 6, 2023): 312–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.18196/jmmr.v12i3.11.

Full text

Abstract:

Information technology is growing rapidly in various fields, especially in health services. The development of information technology in health services is e-health, which aims to improve public health, expand and reach health services, and manage patients in real-time. This study aims to determine the publication trend of articles on barriers to medical technology implementation from 2015 – 2022. The publications were retrieved through a search through the Scopus database and obtained 422 publications. This study analyzed the number of publications per year, document type, most contributing countries, subject area of publication, influential authors, number of article citations, and contributing search sources. This study also analyzed and collated documents with Vos Viewer. The results showed that the trend of publications has increased the number of publications from year to year. The types of papers published with the highest number were articles (322 publications) and reviews (90 publications). The most contributing country was the United States, with 191 reports. The dominant subject area was medicine, at 66.23%. The publication with the most citations was an article by Scott Kruse et al. entitled “Evaluating Barriers to Adopting Telemedicine Worldwide: A Systematic Review” from the Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, with the subject area of medicine having 413 citations. Researchers with the highest number of publications (3) were ten authors. The study was limited by the search for literature from a single database, which allowed the literature to not cover all of the literature on barriers to medical technology implementation.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Hladchenko, Myroslava. "Implications of Publication Requirements for the Research Output of Ukrainian Academics in Scopus in 1999–2019." Journal of Data and Information Science 7, no. 3 (August 1, 2022): 71–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2022-0016.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Purpose This article explores the implications of publication requirements for the research output of Ukrainian academics in Scopus in 1999–2019. As such it contributes to the existing body of knowledge on quantitative and qualitative effects of research evaluation policies. Design/methodology/approach Three metrics were chosen to analyse the implications of publication requirements for the quality of research output: publications in predatory journals, publications in local journals and publications per SNIP quartile from the disciplinary perspective. Findings Study results highlight, that, firstly, publications of Ukrainian authors in predatory journals rose to 1% in 2019. Secondly, the share of publications in local journals reached the peak of 47.3% in 2015. In 2019 it fell to 31.8%. Thirdly, though the total number of publications has risen dramatically since 2011, but the share of Q3+Q4 has exceeded the share of Q1+Q2. To summarise, the study findings highligh, that research evaluation policies are required to contain not only quantitative but also qualitative criteria. Research limitation The study does not explore in detail the effects of a particular type of publication requirements. Practical implications The findings of the study have practical implications for policymakers and university managers aimed to develop research evaluation policies. Originality/value This paper gains insights into the effects of publication requirements on the research output of Ukrainian academics in Scopus.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Šubelj, Lovro, Ludo Waltman, Vincent Traag, and Nees Jan van Eck. "Intermediacy of publications." Royal Society Open Science 7, no. 1 (January 2020): 190207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190207.

Full text

Abstract:

Citation networks of scientific publications offer fundamental insights into the structure and development of scientific knowledge. We propose a new measure, called intermediacy, for tracing the historical development of scientific knowledge. Given two publications, an older and a more recent one, intermediacy identifies publications that seem to play a major role in the historical development from the older to the more recent publication. The identified publications are important in connecting the older and the more recent publication in the citation network. After providing a formal definition of intermediacy, we study its mathematical properties. We then present two empirical case studies, one tracing historical developments at the interface between the community detection literature and the scientometric literature and one examining the development of the literature on peer review. We show both conceptually and empirically how intermediacy differs from main path analysis, which is the most popular approach for tracing historical developments in citation networks. Main path analysis tends to favour longer paths over shorter ones, whereas intermediacy has the opposite tendency. Compared to the main path analysis, we conclude that intermediacy offers a more principled approach for tracing the historical development of scientific knowledge.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Mokhnacheva, Y. V. "Russian-Armenian scientific cooperation from the viewpoint of joint publication activity (on DBs «Web of Science Core Collection», «Scopus», Russian Science Citation Index for 2005-2014)." Bibliosphere, no. 3 (September 30, 2016): 53–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2016-3-53-59.

Full text

Abstract:

The Commonwealth of Independent States creation in 1991 was a new reality for cooperation and development of post-Soviet states. Russia and Armenia have long close and stable relations in the scientific-educational sphere. The article objective is to evaluate the joint Russian-Armenian documentary flow in various scientific fields for ten years (2005-2014). As the research information base three main resources were studied that allow analyzing the co-publication activity: «Web of Science Core Collection» (Thomson Reuters); Scopus (Elsevier); RISC (OLC «Scientific Electronic Library»). Research articles and reviews were considered. The Russian-Armenian documentary flow dynamics was studied with the differentiation by arrays: publications, whose authors are both the Russian and Armenian scientists; publication created with and without participation in major international collaborations; publications involving authors of third countries; publication without the participation of third countries authors. Evaluation indicators of the joint Russian-Armenian publication activity were: the publications number dynamics; average citation; frequency distribution of publications on periodicals; frequency distribution of joint publications on areas of knowledge. The study reveals growing the number of publications, whose authors are Russian and Armenian scientists working in large international collaborations (ATLAS, CMS Collaboration, ALICE Collaboration, etc.) recent years. Such publications citation is quite high: the level of citation exceeds the world average parameters two-seven times for these years. The level of the cited publication carried on without international collaborations is 62-155% of the world average indicators. The documentary flow out of collaborations, but with the participation of third countries authors has a varied dynamic with an average growth rate about 1% (WoS) to 2% (Scopus). The main co-author states as «third» countries are: Germany, Italy, the USA and the UK. Main cooperation between Russia and Armenia takes place in physics and astronomy (about 1/2 of joint publications); chemistry (8%) and biology (6%) and material science (6%). Sciences spectrum of joint research is represented by 23 branches of knowledge. The study results showed a high level of the Russian-Armenian scientific ties with good development potential.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Firdaus, Thoha, Arini Rosa Sinensis, Widayanti Widayanti, and Effendi Effendi. "Pelatihan Publikasi Karya Ilmiah di Jurnal Nasional Bagi Guru SMP Negeri 2 Buay Madang Timur OKU Timur." Jurnal Indonesia Mengabdi 4, no. 1 (August 4, 2022): 25–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.30599/jimi.v4i1.1659.

Full text

Abstract:

A community service has been carried out with the topic of Scientific Publication Training in the National Journal for Teachers of SMP Negeri 2 Buay Madang Timur which is embodied in an agenda with the theme of Publication Management. This service aims to provide training and understanding of scientific publications in the teacher's morning national journal. The method implemented is using training and mentoring methods regarding scientific publications in national journals. In the activity carried out several stages of material topics that lead to the main goal. The stages of the material presented include the importance of scientific publications to teachers, then continued with an explanation of what components are contained in scientific publications, and finally the practice of scientific publication training. After the activity took place the teacher felt helped by this training. Teachers become more aware of the importance of scientific publications for teachers, one of which is for functional promotions, teachers become more aware of how to make good and correct scientific papers, and teachers know and know how to publish scientific papers through the online submission process..

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Hariyono, Eko, Titin Sunarti, Fenny Roshayanti, Hasan Nuurul Hidaayatullaah, and Desi Wulandari. "Trends Research and Publication of Master Students in Science Education Program." Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram 10, no. 1 (January 30, 2022): 104. http://dx.doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v10i1.4820.

Full text

Abstract:

College students' creativity can be seen based on the novelty of research. The main objective of this study was to analyze trends research and publicationof the master of science education at the State University of Surabaya. The descriptive qualitative method used in this study. The data of this study collected by analyse the last five years research abstracts from 2015 to 2020. The data obtained were analyzed using a total sampling technique. Research trends and publication in the Master of Science education at the State University of Surabaya are mostly researching about the development of learning tools with qualitative-quantitative methods and research topics about innovative learning in the field of thinking skills. Some college student research uses curriculum topics, learning media, and assessments. While the publication trend is obtained by analyzing the publication of student articles resulting from the thesis based on the analysis of publications in the category of international and national journals. Department heads need policy recommendations in making decisions to improve research trends and college student publications. current study result implies that research trends in the Master of Science education at the State University of Surabaya require further innovation.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Starodubov, V. I., S. L. Kuznetsov, N. G. Kurakova, and L. A. Tsvetkova. "THE REPRESENTATION OF SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS OF RAMS IN WEB OF SCIENCE: EVALUATION OF CURRENT INDICATORS AND PROSPECTS OF THEIR INCREASING." Annals of the Russian academy of medical sciences 67, no. 9 (September 10, 2012): 59–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.15690/vramn.v67i9.408.

Full text

Abstract:

The contribution scientific publications of Russian Academy of Medical Sciences (RAMS) in the national publication stream, indexed by Web of Science over the past thirty years, was estimated. The indicators of publication activity that are necessary for the institutions of RAMS to achieve in short-term period the conformity with bibliometric indicators, established by Presidential Decree of May 7, 2012 (to increase the share of Russian publications in Web of Science to 2.44% in 2015) were calculated. It is shown that the current structure of global science, where publications in medicine make up for approximately one third of scientific publications in the world, set for RAMS scientists particularly difficult task: to double in three years the number of publications in Web of Sci. In the article are proposed the priorities and the necessary steps to fulfill this task.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

The Review. "Publications récentes — Recent publications." Revue Internationale de la Croix-Rouge/International Review of the Red Cross 81, no. 834 (June 1999): 438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1560775500097625.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Crespi, Gregory S. "Pre-Publication Publications." SSRN Electronic Journal, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4143835.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

CAML Editor. "Récentes publications / Publication Announcements." CAML Review / Revue de l'ACBM, April 1, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.25071/1708-6701.3631.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

"Ontvangen Publicaties / Publications Received." Oud Holland - Quarterly for Dutch Art History 115, no. 3-4 (2001): 238–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/187501701x00307.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

"Ontvangen Publicaties / Publications Received." Oud Holland - Quarterly for Dutch Art History 117, no. 3-4 (2004): 268–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/187501704x00430.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

"Ontvangen Publicaties/ Publications Received." Oud Holland - Quarterly for Dutch Art History 118, no. 1-2 (2005): 110–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/187501705x00295.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

"Ontvangen Publicaties / Publications Received." Oud Holland - Quarterly for Dutch Art History 120, no. 1-2 (2007): 151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/187501707x00275.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

"Ontvangen publicaties/ Publications received." Oud Holland - Quarterly for Dutch Art History 122, no. 1 (2009): 77–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/187501709788745148.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

"Ontvangen Publicaties / Publications Received." Oud Holland - Quarterly for Dutch Art History 110, no. 3-4 (1996): 174–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/187501796x00420.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

"Ontvangen Publicaties Publications Received." Oud Holland - Quarterly for Dutch Art History 112, no. 4 (1998): 272–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/187501798x00266.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

"Ontvangen Publicaties / Publications Received." Oud Holland - Quarterly for Dutch Art History 113, no. 4 (1999): 230–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/187501799x00418.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

"Ontvangen Publicaties / Publications Received." Oud Holland - Quarterly for Dutch Art History 113, no. 1-2 (1999): 90–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/187501799x00625.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

"Society Publications, Reviewed [Publication Activities]." IEEE Control Systems 31, no. 6 (December 2011): 22–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mcs.2011.942563.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Journal articles on the topic 'Publications'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles