Academic literature on the topic 'Public understanding of science'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Public understanding of science.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Public understanding of science"
Huxster, Joanna K., Matthew H. Slater, Jason Leddington, Victor LoPiccolo, Jeffrey Bergman, Mack Jones, Caroline McGlynn, et al. "Understanding “understanding” in Public Understanding of Science." Public Understanding of Science 27, no. 7 (October 23, 2017): 756–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963662517735429.
Full textSinatra, Gale M., and Barbara K. Hofer. "Public Understanding of Science." Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no. 2 (July 9, 2016): 245–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2372732216656870.
Full textAllchin, Douglas. "PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE." American Biology Teacher 73, no. 1 (January 1, 2011): 51–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/abt.2011.73.1.11.b.
Full textRip, Arie. "Public understanding of science." Science and Public Policy 32, no. 5 (October 2005): 408–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/spp/32.5.408.
Full textZiman, John. "Public Understanding of Science." Science, Technology, & Human Values 16, no. 1 (January 1991): 99–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016224399101600106.
Full textJames, F. E. "Public Understanding of Science." Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 96, no. 12 (December 2003): 619. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014107680309601228.
Full textTurney, J. "Public understanding of science." Lancet 347, no. 9008 (April 1996): 1087–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90283-4.
Full textJames, F. E. "Public understanding of science." JRSM 96, no. 12 (December 1, 2003): 619. http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.96.12.619-a.
Full textGouthier, Daniele. "Understanding science publics." Journal of Science Communication 04, no. 01 (December 9, 2005): R01. http://dx.doi.org/10.22323/2.04010701.
Full textEinsiedel, Edna F. "Publics and Vaccinomics: Beyond Public Understanding of Science." OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology 15, no. 9 (September 2011): 607–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/omi.2010.0139.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Public understanding of science"
Lawlor, Andrea. "Understanding public policy through mass media." Thesis, McGill University, 2014. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=121392.
Full textLes médias ont des effets directs et indirects sur les politiques. À différents moments, les médias peuvent participer à la création et à la diffusion de politiques, tout comme ils peuvent éclaircir le processus d'élaboration de ces politiques. Le rôle des médias dans ce processus, surtout par rapport à leur capacité d'influer sur les décideurs de façon directe, d'avancer systématiquement des politiques de rechange ou d'influencer l'opinion publique, est reconnu dans la littérature spécialisée. Toutefois, on y aborde rarement un autre rôle fondamental des médias, qui est celui de nous faire comprendre le processus de création de politiques. Pour le public, les médias de masse constituent la principale source d'information sur les politiques, mais le volume et le ton des rapports médiatiques à ce sujet au fil du temps – sans oublier les apprentissages sur les politiques publiques que nous pouvons tirer des données des médias – sont souvent négligés. La présente dissertation traite de l'utilisation des médias comme outils pour approfondir notre compréhension du récit, de la formulation et de la modification des politiques publiques. Elle propose également une approche pour appliquer des données médiatiques à l'examen des rapports entre acteurs politiques et domaines. La présente étude s'appuie sur une analyse de contenu automatisée de données comparatives des médias, couvrant une période de plus de 25 ans. Chacune des trois grandes sections de l'analyse apporte une contribution à la littérature spécialisée, en explorant les politiques en matière de pension et d'immigration, ainsi que la question de l'adhésion aux politiques. Dans son ensemble, l'étude renseigne sur la portée de l'expression, du langage et du récit sur la compréhension populaire des nombreux aspects du processus d'élaboration de politiques. Les résultats de l'analyse soulignent l'importance de comprendre le rôle des médias dans la traduction de ce processus. De plus, les chercheurs qui s'intéressent aux politiques et à la communication politique peuvent utiliser l'approche méthodologique proposée pour étudier les rapports complexes entre les politiques et les médias.
Wardell, Claire Amanda. "Facts, fictions and futures : towards a cultural understanding of the public understanding of science." Thesis, Goldsmiths College (University of London), 2001. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.395672.
Full textMaralack, Bernado Canon Theodore. "Public understanding of science : (a case study of a coloured community)." Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/53564.
Full textENGLISH ABSTRACT: While the importance of science and technology for society has long been recognised, it has taken on ever increasing importance in the present century. As a result this study, government (The year of Science and Technology - 1998), and other initiatives by concerned bodies efforts are directed to better inform the public about the nature and role of science and technology. It aimed to make citizens both better informed and better able to adapt to the many changes that science and technology have brought, and will continue to bring, to their lives. Despite these efforts many citizens remain ill informed about the scientific advances, and how technology affects their lives. As a result, most members of the public are unable to form substantiated judgements about matters involving science and technology. It is essential that ways are find to improve the public understands of science and technology. This study discusses the results of an empirical survey which was conducted in a coloured community in Paarl. The thesis summarises the results of the survey on these issues. It presents data on the public's understanding of science and technology and lists efforts that have been made to improve the understanding of science and technology. The study describes efforts to make information on science and technology more readily available to the public. Finally, it proposed measures that various actors might usefully take to improve public understanding of science and technology.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Die belangrikheid van wetenskap en tegnologie vir die samelewing word reeds 'n geruime tyd erken, en het veraloor die laaste eeu toegeneem. Hieruit spruit die poging van hierdie studie, die regering (die Jaar van Wetenskap en Tegnologie 1998), en ander inisiatiewe deur belanghebbende organisasies om die algemene publiek in te lig rakende die rol van wetenskap en tegnologie. Dit poog om die algemene publiek in te lig oor, en in staat te stelom aan te pas by die veranderinge wat wetenskap en tegnologie reeds meegebring het, en nog sal meebring in hulle daaglikse lewe. Ten spyte van hierdie pogings is verskeie lede van die publiek steeds oningelig rakende wetenskaplike veranderinge en die wyses waarop tegnologie hulle lewens beïnvloed. Gevolglik is 'n groot gedeelte van die algemene publiek nie in staat om ingeligte oordele te kan maak met betrekking tot wetenskap- en tegnologieverwante aangeleenthede nie. Dit is dus essensieel dat maniere gevind word om die algemene publiek se persepsie van wetenskap en tegnologie te verbeter. Hierdie studie bespreek die resultate van 'n empiriese opname wat onder 'n bruin gemeenskap in Paarlonderneem is. Dit bevat resultate oor die algemene publiek se persepsies van wetenskap en tegnologie, en gee 'n aanduiding van die pogings wat aangewend is om hierdie persepsie te verbeter. Die studie beskryf ook die pogings wat aangewend is om inligting rakende wetenskap en tegnologie meer beskikbaar te maak vir die algemene publiek. Ten slotte, word maniere voorgestel waarop die verskeie rolspelers strategiee geimplementeer kan word vir die uitbouing van die algemene publiek se persepsie van wetenskap en tegnologie.
Humffray, Jennifer Jane, and n/a. "Early childhood science education : the study of young children's understanding of forces." University of Canberra. Teacher Education, 2000. http://erl.canberra.edu.au./public/adt-AUC20060731.131000.
Full textLi, William (William Pui Lum). "Language technologies for understanding law, politics, and public policy." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103673.
Full textThis electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.
Cataloged from student-submitted PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (pages 205-209).
This thesis focuses on the development of machine learning and natural language processing methods and their application to large, text-based open government datasets. We focus on models that uncover patterns and insights by inferring the origins of legal and political texts, with a particular emphasis on identifying text reuse and text similarity in these document collections. First, we present an authorship attribution model on unsigned U.S. Supreme Court opinions, offering insights into the authorship of important cases and the dynamics of Supreme Court decision-making. Second, we apply software engineering metrics to analyze the complexity of the United States Code of Laws, thereby illustrating the structure and evolution of the U.S. Code over the past century. Third, we trace policy trajectories of legislative bills in the United States Congress, enabling us to visualize the contents of four key bills during the Financial Crisis. These applications on diverse open government datasets reveal that text reuse occurs widely in legal and political texts: similar ideas often repeat in the same corpus, different historical versions of documents are usually quite similar, or legitimate reasons for copying or borrowing text may exist. Motivated by this observation, we present a novel statistical text model, Probabilistic Text Reuse (PTR), for finding repeated passages of text in large document collections. We illustrate the utility of PTR by finding template ideas, less-common voices, and insights into document structure in a large collection of public comments on regulations proposed by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on net neutrality. These techniques aim to help citizens better understand political processes and help governments better understand political speech.
by William P. Li.
Ph. D.
Lundberg, Karin. "Citizens and Contemporary Science Ways to dialogue in science centre contexts." Thesis, Högskolan Dalarna, Vetenskapskommunikation, 2005. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:du-2536.
Full textWilson, Sharlene. "Understanding Presidential Voting Motivation by Factors of Agency." ScholarWorks, 2015. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/427.
Full textGwon, Misook. "Measuring and Understanding Public Opinion on Human Evolution." University of Cincinnati / OhioLINK, 2012. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1353342586.
Full textD'Amour, Lissa M., and University of Lethbridge Faculty of Education. "An illustrative phenomenographic case study : charting the landscape of "public understanding of science"." Thesis, Lethbridge, Alta. : University of Lethbridge, Faculty of Education, 2008, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/10133/733.
Full textx, 225 leaves ; 29 cm. --
Knazko, Jana. "Understanding government Web communication strategy as applied within the Public Health Agency of Canada." Thesis, University of Ottawa (Canada), 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/10393/27698.
Full textBooks on the topic "Public understanding of science"
The public understanding of science. London: The Society, 1985.
Find full textBodmer, Walter. The public understanding of science. London: J.W. Ruddock and Sons, 1986.
Find full textBodmer, W. F. The public understanding of science. London: Birkbeck, 1986.
Find full textEliassen, Kjell A. Understanding public management. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications, 2008.
Find full textPeter, Csermely, and Lederman Leon M, eds. Science education: Talent recruitment and public understanding. Burke, VA: IOS Press, 2003.
Find full textDye, Thomas R. Understanding public policy. New York: Longman, 2011.
Find full textWalton, Richard$cd 1733. Issues in: Science teaching and the public understanding of science. Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University, 2002.
Find full textCairney, Paul. Understanding public policy: Theories and issues. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
Find full textUnderstanding public policy. Boston: Pearson, 2013.
Find full textDye, Thomas R. Understanding public policy. New York: Longman, 2010.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Public understanding of science"
Seakins, Amy, and Marie Hobson. "Public Understanding of Science." In Science Education, 443–52. Rotterdam: SensePublishers, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-749-8_32.
Full textJuan, Andrea, Michael Gastrow, and Vijay Reddy. "Public Understanding of Science." In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, 5229–32. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2331.
Full textBauer, Martin W., and Bankole A. Falade. "Public understanding of science." In Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, 238–66. 3rd ed. Third edition. | Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2021. | Series: Routledge international handbooks: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003039242-14-14.
Full textReddy, Vijay, Saahier Parker, and Sylvia Hannan. "Public Understanding of Science." In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, 1–8. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_2331-2.
Full textWormer, Holger. "Vom Public Understanding of Science zum Public Understanding of Journalism." In Forschungsfeld Wissenschaftskommunikation, 429–51. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12898-2_23.
Full textSleigh, Charlotte. "Says Who? Science and Public Understanding." In Literature and Science, 179–204. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-26811-2_8.
Full textMiller, Jon D. "Public Understanding of Science, Assessment of." In Encyclopedia of Science Education, 1–3. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6165-0_79-2.
Full textMiller, Jon D. "Public Understanding of Science, Assessment of." In Encyclopedia of Science Education, 812–14. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2150-0_79.
Full textBaillie, Caroline. "Public Understanding of Science and Technology." In Engineers within a Local and Global Society, 39–40. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-79934-1_6.
Full textWynne, Brian. "Public Understanding and the Management of Science." In The Management of Science, 143–69. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21275-0_9.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Public understanding of science"
Priaulx, Nicky, and Martin Weinelm. "Understanding “Understanding” in Science Communication." In 2016: Confronting the challenges of public participation in environmental, planning and health decision-making. Iowa State University, Digital Press, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/sciencecommunication-180809-44.
Full textTrache, Livius, Cristinel Diaconu, Livius Trache, and Sabin Stoica. "Outreach Session: Science education and the Public Understanding of Science." In EXOTIC NUCLEI AND NUCLEAR/PARTICLE ASTROPHYSICS (II): Proceedings of the Carpathian Summer School of Physics 2007. AIP, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2870468.
Full textPINZANI, P., C. ORLANDO, B. SALVADORI, M. PAZZAGLI, F. TORRICELLI, and L. MERCATI. "PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE AND HEALTH: THE FLORENCE PROJECT." In Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9789812811158_0115.
Full textAlmassi, Ben. "Public Understanding of Climate Science and the Ethics of Expertise." In 2016: Confronting the challenges of public participation in environmental, planning and health decision-making. Iowa State University, Digital Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/sciencecommunication-180809-55.
Full textWolfendale, A. W., Livius Trache, and Sabin Stoica. "THE PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE: ‘THE WOLFENDALE REPORT’ AND OTHER MATTERS." In EXOTIC NUCLEI AND NUCLEAR/PARTICLE ASTROPHYSICS (II): Proceedings of the Carpathian Summer School of Physics 2007. AIP, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2870469.
Full textSiravuri, Harish Varma, Akhil Pandey Akella, Christian Bailey, and Hamed Alhoori. "Using Social Media and Scholarly Text to Predict Public Understanding of Science." In JCDL '18: The 18th ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3197026.3203890.
Full textBahri, Saeful, and Ari Widyati Purwantiasning. "Understanding the Application of Photovoltaic Technology for Public Transportation." In International Conference on Advanced Research in Applied Science and Engineering. Global, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.33422/raseconf.2019.07.358.
Full textBillings, Linda. "Advancing Public Understanding by "Attitude Adjustment": Strategic Communication About Space Science and Exploration." In 57th International Astronautical Congress. Reston, Virigina: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.iac-06-e1.4.01.
Full textKazeni, Monde, and Nosipho Mkhwanazi. "LIFE SCIENCES TEACHERS’ UNDERSTANDING, PERCEPTIONS AND ADOPTION OF INQUIRY-BASED SCIENCE EDUCATION IN SELECTED SOUTH AFRICAN HIGH SCHOOLS." In International Conference on Education and New Developments. inScience Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.36315/2021end006.
Full textCarter, Jackie, and James Nicholson. "Teaching statistical literacy by getting students to use real world data: 40 years worth of experience in 40 minutes." In Promoting Understanding of Statistics about Society. International Association for Statistical Education, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.52041/srap.16304.
Full textReports on the topic "Public understanding of science"
Balbus, Arielle, Andrew Hoffman, Peter Frumhoff, and Kate Cell. Increasing Public Understanding of Climate Risks & Choices: Learning from Social Science Research and Practice. University of Michigan, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/2027.42/138021.
Full textMcGee, Steven, Randi Mcgee-Tekula, and Noelia Baez Rodriguez. Using the Science of Hurricane Resilience to Foster the Development of Student Understanding and Appreciation for Science in Puerto Rico. The Learning Partnership, March 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.51420/conf.2022.1.
Full textMitralexis, Sotiris. Religion as Science, Science as Religion, and an Unwelcome Reformation: Science and Religion in the Public Square during COVID-19 – a Greek Orthodox Case Study. Analogia 17 (2023), March 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.55405/17-1-mitralexis.
Full textLeFebvre, Rebecca. Implementing Undergraduate Research in an Online Gateway Political Science Course (Dataset). Kennesaw State University, July 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.32727/27.2022.1.
Full textUK, Ipsos. Survey of public attitudes towards precision breeding. Food Standards Agency, October 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.46756/sci.fsa.ouv127.
Full textBoda, Phillip, and Steven McGee. Supporting Teachers for Computer Science Reform: Lessons from over 20,000 Students in Chicago. The Learning Partnership, February 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.51420/brief.2021.1.
Full textYin, Yian, Yuxiao Dong, Kuansan Wang, Dashun Wang, and Benjamin Jones. Science as a Public Good: Public Use and Funding of Science. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, April 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w28748.
Full textHenrick, Erin, Steven McGee, Lucia Dettori, Troy Williams, Andrew Rasmussen, Don Yanek, Ronald Greenberg, and Dale Reed. Research-Practice Partnership Strategies to Conduct and Use Research to Inform Practice. The Learning Partnership, April 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.51420/conf.2021.3.
Full textHamilton, Lawrence. Climate change: partisanship, understanding, and public opinion. University of New Hampshire Libraries, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.34051/p/2020.134.
Full textKanade, Takeo, Steven Shafer, and Katsushi Ikeuchi. Basic Research in Computer Science: Image Understanding. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, October 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada396206.
Full text