Academic literature on the topic 'Public intangible assets'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Public intangible assets.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Public intangible assets"
Frey, Hannes, and Andreas Oehler. "Intangible assets in Germany." Journal of Applied Accounting Research 15, no. 2 (September 2, 2014): 235–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jaar-07-2014-0068.
Full textAleynikova, Marina. "Federal accounting standard for public finance “Intangible assets”: compliance with current legislation and IFRS OS." Buhuchet v zdravoohranenii (Accounting in Healthcare), no. 4 (April 1, 2020): 12–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.33920/med-17-2004-02.
Full textDruzhilovskaya, T. Y. "Directions for further development of accounting for intangible assets." Buhuchet v zdravoohranenii (Accounting in Healthcare), no. 8 (August 22, 2022): 5–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.33920/med-17-2208-01.
Full textBrooks, Robert, and Bill Dimovski. "The Importance of Intangible Assets in Initial Public Offerings." International Journal of Knowledge, Culture, and Change Management: Annual Review 4, no. 1 (2005): 0. http://dx.doi.org/10.18848/1447-9524/cgp/v04/50207.
Full textHasprová, Olga, Zdeněk Brabec, and Jiří Rozkovec. "Intangible assets disclosed by public universities in Czech Republic." Journal of International Studies 11, no. 1 (March 2018): 67–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2018/11-1/5.
Full textVlasova, O. M., B. B. Gorelov, L. M. Korzhueva, and L. V. Postnikova. "Reflection of the life cycle of an intangible asset in the accounting of a budgetary institution of the agro-industrial complex." Buhuchet v sel'skom hozjajstve (Accounting in Agriculture), no. 7 (July 25, 2022): 488–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.33920/sel-11-2207-03.
Full textTunin, S. A., A. V. Frolov, V. I. Khoruzhy, and T. M. Vorozheykina. "Reflection of the life cycle of an intangible asset in the accounting of a budgetary institution of the agro-industrial complex." Buhuchet v sel'skom hozjajstve (Accounting in Agriculture), no. 7 (July 25, 2022): 473–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.33920/sel-11-2207-02.
Full textVasconcelos, Tiago De, and Rogerio Marino. "Relation between intangible assets, macroeconomic environment, and market value of German public companies - period from 1999 to 2016." Revista Brasileira de Administração Científica 11, no. 3 (June 3, 2020): 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.6008/cbpc2179-684x.2020.003.0001.
Full textRautiainen, Antti, and Vilma Luoma-aho. "Reputation and financial reporting in Finnish public organizations." Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management 33, no. 4 (April 9, 2021): 487–511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jpbafm-10-2020-0179.
Full textKanapickienė, Rasa. "Control measures in the accounting of intangible assets of public sector entities." Buhalterinės apskaitos teorija ir praktika, no. 16 (July 5, 2019): 19–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/batp.2014.no16.2.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Public intangible assets"
Andersson, Josefin, and Beatrice Johansson. "Value and proportions of intangible assets : A comparison between the private- and the public sector." Thesis, Internationella Handelshögskolan, Högskolan i Jönköping, IHH, Företagsekonomi, 2016. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-29980.
Full textLorini, Marcela. "Contribuições ao estudo do tratamento contábil dos ativos intangíveis no setor público." reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/10183/183297.
Full textBrazilian Public Accounting has undergone a series of modifications in search for normative adequation, including the treatment of intangible assets, since 2004. From the earliest efforts to bring Public Accounting to international standards, with the creation of a specific study group for this purpose, by 2014, the process of implementing changes had not taken place in practice, despite the whole effort of the CFC, STN and Executive Secretariat of the Ministry of Finance. However, in 2015, with the system adequation and the publication of Order No. 548, a schedule was established for the gradual adoption of accounting procedures until 2021.This study aimed to make a series of necessary notes on the accounting treatment of intangible assets in the public sector, given its mandatory start in 2019. The results obtained were that the greatest challenges to be faced by the professionals of the public sector are: (a) the quest for understanding the concept and the definition of the asset; (b) the analysis of the uncertainty and risks regarding the occurrence of future economic benefits; (c) the verification of the relevance and reliability of the accounting information; (d) the choice of an appropriate measurement basis; (e) the differentiation between research and development expenses; (f) the classification and determination on the lifespan of the intangible asset; and (g) evaluation of how to apply these accounting procedures in the government area. These challenges require the training of employees, through the study of the accounting theory, the Brazilian and international accounting standards and specific guidelines of regulatory agencies, and require support of each public institution’s management so that the treatment is effective and in accordance with the regulations.
Blanchet, Pierre-Adrien. "La valorisation du patrimoine immatériel des personnes publiques." Thesis, Paris 2, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018PA020087.
Full textOver the past decade, public entities have become aware of the economic potential of their "intangible assets". Upon analysis, such assets are highly diversified and include both irrelevant and relevant items, which can be described as "intangible public properties". It is critical for public entities to achieve a balance between different constraints when promoting their "intangible assets". They must be able to generate new financial resources from such assets by exploiting them while ensuring its adequate protection. Irrelevant elements usually included in the "intangible assets" are often subject to autonomous legal regimes which, taken altogether, allow public entities to contemplate a balanced valuation. As for intangible public properties, the analysis will focus on the challenges faced while incorporating them into the domain regime - whether public or private - and then on the available options to implement a legal regime capable of ensuring an optimal valuation
Segal, Andy. "The High Cost and Value of Patents: Finding the Appropriate Balance Between the Rights of the Inventor and the Advancement of Society." Scholarship @ Claremont, 2012. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/400.
Full textEichlerová, Gabriela. "Možnosti implementace některých standardů IPSAS do české účetní legislativy." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2012. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-162530.
Full textMartins, Filomena Maria Fonseca Correia. "Certificação da formação profissional nos Serviços Municipalizados de Água e Saneamento de Almada." Master's thesis, Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/21653.
Full textEste projeto teve como objetivo a revisão do processo formativo dos Serviços Municipalizados de Água e Saneamento (SMAS) de Almada, com vista à preparação da sua certificação.Esta certificação implica a implementação de um sistema de gestão garante de melhoria contínua desta importante vertente da gestão de recursos humanos, com vista à obtenção do máximo benefício para a organização e para os trabalhadores e, por inerência, para o serviço público e sociedade.Metodologicamente o projeto passou por uma revisão bibliográfica relacionada com o tema da formação e desenvolvimento profissional, enquanto ferramenta de gestão estratégica de pessoas, com impacto positivo nos ativos intangíveis e no desempenho das organizações e na sociedade, com o intuito de sublinhar a importância do seu investimento, para a generalidade das organizações, onde se incluem as que compõem a função pública, que consideramos terem, nesta como em outras matérias, responsabilidade social acrescida. Foi realizado um estudo documental acerca do processo existente na organização com vista à identificação dos aspetos que cumprem as exigências do referencial de certificação e propondo alterações relativamente àqueles que estavam em incumprimento.Paralelamente, esperamos que a realização deste trabalho possa contribuir para o reforço da credibilidade e valorização da atividade formativa nos SMAS de Almada.
This project aimed a review of the formative process of the Serviços Municipalizados de Água e Saneamento (SMAS) in Almada, in order to prepare it’s certification. This certification implies the implementation of a management system that guarantees the continuous improvement of this important aspect of human resources management, in order to obtain the maximum benefit for the organization and it’s workers and, inherently, for the public service and society.Methodologically, the project underwent a bibliographic review related to the topic of professional training and development, as a tool for strategic people management, with a positive impact on intangible assets and the performance of organizations and society, in order to underline the importance of their investment, for most organizations, including those that make up the civil service, which we consider to have, in this as in other matters, increased social responsibility. A documentary study was carried about the existing process in the organization, with the goal of identifying the aspects that meet the requirements of the certification framework and proposing changes regarding those that don’t. At the same time, we hope that this work can contribute to reinforcing the credibility and valorization of the training activity at SMAS Almada.
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Kaplangil, Diren. "Les enjeux juridiques de l'Open Data : Les données publiques entre la patrimonialisation et dé-patrimonialisation." Thesis, Université Grenoble Alpes, 2022. http://www.theses.fr/2022GRALD001.
Full textThe Legal Issues of Open Data: Public data between patrimonialisation and de-patrimonialisationSince the first commitment of the French Government in its open data policy, for a decade now, the issue of free circulation of public sector information takes a new dimension. Considered as « open » in the sense of « free of any restrictive rights », public data do not serve only the democratic goal of consolidating the rights of citizens in their relations with the public authorities, but rather provide an essential « information infrastructure » which constitutes the basis of today's emerging "digital" economy. However, this transformation in apprehension of public data inevitably raises the question of their legal status, which is still far from being clarified. Whereas some adjustments brought under the regime of open data make them legally closer to the legal status of « commons », some other monopolistic practices coming from the public institutions (in particular cultural establishments or their concessionaires) in exploiting the content of their information reveal another approach which is quite close to the form of exclusive property rights.Moreover, opening public data does not only raise the question of the legal nature of these information. Indeed, these information are at the heart of the French State's public policy relating to its intangible assets seeking to protect and exploit them in a way which sometimes may enter into conflict with the principles of open data. At the crossroads of public and private law, more specifically intellectual property law, our thesis is therefore focused on the analysis of this conflictual relationship emerged around the process of proactive release of public sector data online
Queiroz, Raimunda Maria Brito de. "Gestão do conhecimento e terceirização: estudo de caso da área de desenvolvimento de sistemas da secretaria da fazenda, Bahia." Universidade Federal da Bahia, 2009. http://www.adm.ufba.br/sites/default/files/publicacao/arquivo/raimunda_maria_b_de_queiroz.pdf.
Full textSubmitted by Santiago Fabio (fabio.ssantiago@hotmail.com) on 2013-01-16T19:55:30Z No. of bitstreams: 1 gggggg.pdf: 1451452 bytes, checksum: 8dc3b0023ed9f1932169d07d03967420 (MD5)
Made available in DSpace on 2013-01-16T19:55:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 gggggg.pdf: 1451452 bytes, checksum: 8dc3b0023ed9f1932169d07d03967420 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009
A pesquisa tem como objetivo analisar os efeitos da terceirização para a Gestão do Conhecimento em uma estrutura administrativa de desenvolvimento de sistemas em tecnologia da informação, no setor público. Esta perspectiva abrange o entendimento sobre os mecanismos da gestão do conhecimento e o papel dos profissionais de tecnologia da informação na Organização, na Área e no ciclo de desenvolvimento de sistemas; busca analisar os ativos intangíveis representados pelo capital estrutural, de relacionamento e intelectual e o modelos de terceirização utilizados na Secretaria da Fazenda, Órgão integrante da Administração Pública Direta do Estado da Bahia, para a contratação de desenvolvimento e manutenção de sistemas em tecnologia da informação. O trabalho está fundamentado por um quadro teórico, baseado nos conceitos sobre gestão do conhecimento e seus ativos intangíveis, sobre a terceirização, os modelos e restrições legais no âmbito público e o contexto organizacional da tecnologia da informação, tendo como foco o desenvolvimento de sistemas. Foi realizada uma pesquisa de campo aplicada, na qual se abordou o problema como um estudo de caso exploratório e de cunho quali-quantitativo, privilegiando um entendimento analítico e suportado por observação, pesquisa documental e entrevistas efetuadas com o superintendente, diretor, gerentes, líderes de sistemas e gestores de sistemas da Secretaria da Fazenda do Estado da Bahia (SEFAZ-BA). O instrumento de pesquisa utilizado baseia-se em Rossatto (2003), que propõe três constructos: capital estrutural, capital de relacionamento e capital intelectual. Foram aplicados questionários seguindo o enquadre desses constructos e as respostas foram categorizadas e analisadas. Os resultados encontrados indicam a necessidade de uma efetiva gestão dos ativos intangíveis, apresentam os efeitos gerados pela terceirização nas fases do ciclo de desenvolvimento de sistemas e como o modelo de terceirização atual tem contribuído para o escape do conhecimento da Instituição e entrega de serviços em desacordo com o prazo e qualidade. Traz também contribuições de melhoria tendo em perspectiva o ambiente de desenvolvimento de sistemas e o processo “fim a fim” de gestão das demandas em tecnologia da informação.
Salvador
Costa, Herika Crhistina Maciel de Oliveira. "Estudo comparativo dos modelos de avaliação de inovação para obtenção de capital de risco: programa governamental Criatec I - BNDES versus modelos teóricos para cálculo de intangíveis propostos na Contabilidade." Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, 2015. http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=8973.
Full textComo forma de impulsionar o crescimento econômico, governos de diversos países incentivam o empreendedorismo, a inovação e o desenvolvimento tecnológico. Para isto, se utilizam de programas governamentais por meio de políticas de incentivo ou subvenção econômica a empreendimentos com este perfil. No Brasil, o capital de risco público vem sendo oferecido à empresas inovadoras através dos fundos da série Criatec, com recursos do BNDES. Estas empresas possuem, principalmente, ativos intangíveis, que devem ser considerados pelos investidores em suas avaliações que antecedem o aporte de recursos. Neste contexto, esta pesquisa foi desenvolvida com o objetivo de analisar como a metodologia de avaliação de intangíveis utilizada pelo Fundo Criatec I do BNDES, como ferramenta de apoio de decisão de investimento de capital de risco público, considera os indicadores de inovação frente aos modelos teóricos propostos na literatura contábil. Para isto foi realizado estudo de campo através de entrevistas realizadas com os gestores do Fundo e com diversas empresas investidas por este. Por meio da pesquisa foi observado que é realizada profunda análise das empresas candidatas ao aporte de recursos através da avaliação de três fatores de risco. Foi possível verificar indicadores de inovação presentes nas metodologias de avaliação de intangíveis propostas na literatura contábil na análise de um destes fatores. Contudo foi possível identificar que os indicadores de inovação não são avaliados de forma pré definida e parametrizada no modelo utilizado pelo Fundo.
As a way to expand economic growth, governments of many countries encourage entrepreneurship, innovation and technological development through a series of funding and incentive policies, direct at companies with this specific profile. In Brazil, public venture capital is been ofered to innovative companies through the Criatec funds, criated by BNDES. These companies retain mostly intangible assets, wich should be considered by investors, prior to allocating funds. This research was conducted with the objective to compare the methodology for evaluating intangible assets as well as indicators of innovation used by Criatec/BNDES annalists opposed to the theoretical models proposed by accounting literature. To achieve this objective, a field study was conducted trough interviews of Criatec I fund and the CEOs of many companies that were invested upon by the fund. This research conclude through analysis is conducted on companies that apply for Criatec investments, and mainly 3 risk factors are considered by Criatec I. innovation. Indicators of innovation were actualy considered in this analysis, as well as a methodology to evaluate intangible assets. However the use of both these indicators is yet to be standardized.
Coelho, Daniele Maia Teixeira. "A dicotomia natureza e cultura no âmbito das políticas públicas de proteção do patrimônio cultural imaterial brasileiro." Universidade de São Paulo, 2017. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/106/106132/tde-08012018-105617/.
Full textOur thesis aims to examine to what extent the dichotomy between nature and culture (which is a product of the modernitys scientificity) is reflected in the cultural policies of patrimonial protection, especially of intangible goods, such as knowledge, celebrations, forms of expression and places. In the 21th century, the understanding that there are things that belong to nature and others that belong to society is maintained and we can barely articulate both in only one understanding. We confirmed the existence of such understanding in our analysis of the public administration bodies experience in dealing with nature and culture, defining specific legislation on each subject and acting with the expectation of a whole protection. In particular, we have analyzed the National Historical and Artistic Heritage Institute IPHANs actions regarding the protection of intangible cultural assets. Our hypothesis is that, although the IPHAN has been gradually broadening its horizon in the treatment of the issue, it still continues to formulate guidelines that reaffirm the separation between nature and culture, material and immaterial, real and symbolic. In order to reach our goal, the used methodologies include bibliographic research in specialized literature, official documentary sources (in particular, registration dossiers), the conduction of interviews and the analyzes of some intangible cultural assets images. In this context, some considerations are proposed and concern the attempt to aggregate the existing elements in cultural practices, in order to overcome the dichotomy between nature and culture for achieving a more integrative way to face this issue. One of these considerations concerns the moment of the intangible asset registration and when it would be possible to request the involvement of other bodies, such as the Ministry of Environment, whose attribution is directly linked to the cultural heritage issue. Such a measure would allow the building of more holistic public policies, to be taken as a whole and that take into account the natural and cultural elements of the intangible cultural good. In addition, we consider the importance of extending IPHAN\'s legal competence, by allowing it to tread a path that respects and protects more effectively the symbolic and the real contained in cultural manifestation.
Books on the topic "Public intangible assets"
Board, Accounting Standards. Goodwill & intangible assets: Working paper for discussion at public hearing. London: Accounting Standards Board, 1995.
Find full textMoberly, Michael D. Safeguarding Intangible Assets. Elsevier Science & Technology Books, 2014.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Public intangible assets"
Brønn, Peggy Simcic. "Intangible Assets and Communication." In Public Relations Research, 281–91. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90918-9_18.
Full textLaurìa, Antonio, and Valbona Flora. "The Coastal village of Zvërnec." In Studi e saggi, 225–388. Florence: Firenze University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-175-4.03.
Full textLaurìa, Antonio, Valbona Flora, and Kamela Guza. "Three villages of Përmet: Bënjë, Kosinë and Leusë." In Studi e saggi, 39–156. Florence: Firenze University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-175-4.01.
Full textGarbarino, Helena, Bruno Delgado, and José Carrillo. "Taxonomy of IT Intangible Assets for Public Administration Based on the Electronic Government Maturity Model in Uruguay." In Public Affairs and Administration, 1235–54. IGI Global, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8358-7.ch060.
Full text"Antifragile Communication: Closing the Gap through Intangible Assets." In Public Sector Communication, 65–82. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119135630.ch4.
Full textIorio, Roberto. "Public Intervention to Increase Collaboration between Innovative Agents." In The Economic Importance of Intangible Assets, 119–36. Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781351147002-6.
Full textGarbarino, Helena, Bruno Delgado, and José Carrillo. "Taxonomy of IT Intangible Assets for Public Administration Based on the Electronic Government Maturity Model in Uruguay." In Information Systems Research and Exploring Social Artifacts, 103–22. IGI Global, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2491-7.ch006.
Full textGalassi, Francesco, and Susanna Mancinelli. "Why is Social Capital a 'Capital'? Public Goods, Co-operative Efforts and the Accumulation of Intangible Assets." In The Economic Importance of Intangible Assets, 103–17. Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781351147002-5.
Full textLuna-Reyes, Luis Felipe. "Government Innovation Through Knowledge Management." In Handbook of Research on Public Information Technology, 493–507. IGI Global, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-857-4.ch046.
Full textAfanador, Nicolas, Ricardo Bonilla, and H. Jackson Ocampo. "Smart Tools for Tracing Organizational Competitive Behavior on Fast Decision Making." In Practice, Progress, and Proficiency in Sustainability, 266–91. IGI Global, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9301-1.ch015.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Public intangible assets"
Aditya, Aditya, and Ayuningtyas Hertianti. "Implementation of Intangible Assets Accounting in the Ministry of Public Works and Public Housing Analysis." In 6th International Accounting Conference (IAC 2017). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/iac-17.2018.37.
Full textContarini, Marina, Anna Bernabè, Marco Manfra, and Davide Turrini. "Design for Cultural Heritage at the University of Ferrara." In Sixth International Conference on Higher Education Advances. Valencia: Universitat Politècnica de València, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/head20.2020.11085.
Full textShesterina, Victoria. "Protection of intangible benefits as a priority form of legal protection." In Current problems of jurisprudence. ru: Publishing Center RIOR, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.29039/02058-6/317-326.
Full textReports on the topic "Public intangible assets"
GALYNCHIK, T., and K. BANSHCHIKOVA. INTANGIBLE ASSETS OF RUSSIAN OIL AND GAS COMPANIES. Science and Innovation Center Publishing House, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.12731/2070-7568-2021-10-5-3-35-41.
Full text