Academic literature on the topic 'Public bioethic'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Public bioethic.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Public bioethic"
Guerra, Marc D. "Can We Have a Public Bioethic?" Society 46, no. 4 (May 7, 2009): 333–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12115-009-9221-x.
Full textKNOWLES, LORI P. "The Lingua Franca of Human Rights and the Rise of a Global Bioethic." Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10, no. 3 (June 29, 2001): 253–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s096318010100305x.
Full textMartins, Alexandre A. "Theological Bioethics and Public Health from the Margins." National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 22, no. 2 (2022): 239–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/ncbq202222222.
Full textBryzgalina, Elena V. "Digital Bioethics: Disciplinary Status between Tradition and Computation." Voprosy Filosofii, no. 1 (2023): 94–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2023-1-94-103.
Full textMcGEE, SUMMER. "Ideology and Politicization in Public Bioethics." Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20, no. 1 (January 2011): 73–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0963180110000630.
Full textLapaeva, Valentina V. "The bioethical committee as an institute for social control of technological innovations in medicine: law analysis." Gosudarstvo i pravo, no. 4 (2022): 121. http://dx.doi.org/10.31857/s102694520019559-5.
Full textSleeboom-Faulkner, Margaret, and Seyoung Hwang. "Governance of stem cell research: Public participation and decision-making in China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan." Social Studies of Science 42, no. 5 (June 27, 2012): 684–708. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0306312712450939.
Full textDa Re, Antonio. "Immigrazione e salute come paradigma per la bioetica / Migration and Health as Paradigm for Bioethics." Medicina e Morale 67, no. 2 (June 20, 2018): 187–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/mem.2018.535.
Full textImwinkelried, Edward J. "Expert Testimony by Ethicists: What Should be the Norm?" Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 33, no. 2 (2005): 198–221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720x.2005.tb00487.x.
Full textHubenko, Hanna. "Art and Bioethics: Shift/Fusion of Understanding Genres." Filosofiya osvity. Philosophy of Education 23, no. 2 (December 27, 2018): 245–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.31874/2309-1606-2018-23-2-245-258.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Public bioethic"
Sanchini, V. "FACILITATE DELIBERATION. TOWARDS A PROFESSIONALIZATION OF THE BIOETHICAL EXPERT IN THE PUBLIC ARENA." Doctoral thesis, Università degli Studi di Milano, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/2434/366875.
Full textDurante, Christopher. "Public bioethics & the reality of religious pluralism: coping with moral diversity in bioethical methodology." Thesis, McGill University, 2013. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=114414.
Full textCette thèse examine les problèmes que la diversité religieuse et morale soulèvent dans la bioéthique publique, à la fois dans le développement historique de la discipline et dans la situation contemporaine; de plus, elle constitue une tentative pour développer les fondements d'une méthodologie bioéthique qui est en mesure d'aborder les enjeux du pluralisme sans perdre de vue le fait que la bioéthique a émergé du besoin de lignes directrices morales partagées et d'une analyse éthique rigoureuse des nouvelles technologies médicales. Il a été mon intention de jeter un nouveau regard sur les processus d'enquête et de délibération bioéthiques et d'élaboration de politiques bioéthiques par le développement d'une méthode dialogique d'éthique publique qui puisse permettre simultanément la recherche du consensus ainsi que le respect et l'accommodement des différences morales et ontologiques incommensurables entre traditions religieuses et systèmes philosophiques différents. L'objectif est d'implémenter des modes de délibération qui puissent faire face à la réalité du pluralisme et d'aider à développer des politiques bioéthiques adaptées à notre société multiculturelle et multiconfessionnelle.
Jones, Henry Abel. "Bioethics : a public decision? /." Title page, contents and abstract only, 2002. http://web4.library.adelaide.edu.au/theses/09AR/09arj761.pdf.
Full textCarry, Wendy M. "Public bioethics : an intermediary between public health and the media /." abstract and full text PDF (free order & download UNR users only), 2007. http://0-gateway.proquest.com.innopac.library.unr.edu/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqdiss&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:1448328.
Full text"December, 2007." Includes bibliographical references (leaves 52-54). Online version available on the World Wide Web. Library also has microfilm. Ann Arbor, Mich. : ProQuest Information and Learning Company, [2007]. 1 microfilm reel ; 35 mm.
Musse, Luciana Barbosa. "Políticas públicas em saúde mental no Brasil na perspectiva do biodireito: a experiência dos estados de Minas Gerais e São Paulo sob a égide da lei 10.216/2001 e suas implicações." Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 2006. https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/7170.
Full textThis research was conducted with the purpose of elucidating the public policies concerning mental health care in Brazil adopted since the promulgation of the law n. 10.216/2001 and which contemplate the mental disturbance carrier attendance and his rights. In order to analyze them, as well as its implications, Biolaw was adopted as reference, considered as a dogmatic theoretical construction, aiming the standard interpretation for juridical decision taking, in order to identify the rationality criterion that surrounds them if efficiency or public ethics. Considering that, since the 1988 Federal Constitution, the whole actions and services supply concerning mental health care are conducted by state, municipal or federal institutions or by the private initiative, with complementary character, the SUS , that is organized based on the regionalism, decentralization and hierarchy principles, the experience of two federal state members was elected, specifically the states of Minas Gerais and Sao Paulo, in order to illustrate the implementation process of strategies adopted by Brazilian public policies concerning mental health care, under the aegis of the law n. 10.216/2001. The data were collected through observation and with the application of questionnaires, answered by (mental) health professionals and by users (or their legal responsible) of hospital and health care services or by mental health care of the states of Minas Gerais and Sao Paulo. Besides those two documentation techniques, this research is based on the historical method, together with the statistic and comparative methods which permits the conclusion that prevailing rationality among public policies concerning mental health care adopted by the Brazilian state is the ethics, that, meanwhile, to be effective, depends on the efficiency and creates implications for the user and mental disturbance carrier that extrapolates the standard limits of the law n. 10.216/2001 and trespasses others meanderings of its existence, especially its juridical and ethical autonomy which creates reflexes, in turn, in the fruition of its recently conquered citizenship
Esta pesquisa tem como objeto as políticas públicas em saúde mental no Brasil, adotadas a partir da promulgação da lei n. 10.216/2001 e que contemplam a assistência ao portador de transtorno mental e seus direitos. Para analisá-las, bem como as suas implicações, adota-se como referencial o Biodireito, entendido como uma construção teórico-dogmática com vistas à interpretação normativa para a tomada de decisão judicial, a fim de identificar o critério de racionalidade que as permeia - se a eficiência ou a ética pública. Tendo-se em vista que, desde a CF/88 o conjunto das ações e da oferta de serviços em saúde mental, dá-se por meio de órgãos e instituições federais, estaduais e municipais, bem como da iniciativa privada, em caráter complementar, o SUS, que se organiza de acordo com os princípios da regionalização, descentralização e hierarquização, elegeu-se a experiência de dois estadosmembros da federação, notadamente, Minas Gerais e São Paulo, para ilustrar o processo de implantação das estratégias adotadas pelas políticas públicas brasileiras em saúde mental, sob a égide da lei n. 10.216/2001. Os dados foram coletados por meio de observação e aplicação de questionários, respondidos por profissionais da saúde (mental) e por usuários (ou seu responsável legal) de serviços hospitalares e comunitários de saúde ou saúde mental de Minas Gerais e São Paulo. Além dessas duas técnicas de documentação, a pesquisa é pautada pelo método histórico, aliado ao estatístico e ao comparativo, que permitem concluir que a racionalidade predominante nas políticas públicas em saúde mental, adotadas pelo Estado Brasileiro é a ética, que, entretanto, para ter efetividade, depende da eficiência e gera implicações para o usuário portador de transtorno mental que extrapolam os limites normativos da lei n. 10.216/2001 e invadem outros meandros da sua existência, em especial a sua autonomia ético-jurídica, que reflete, por sua vez, no gozo da sua cidadania recém conquistada
Pritchard, Kathryn. "Bioethics, public policy and the Church of England." Thesis, University of Winchester, 2015. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.698197.
Full textIvarsson, Markus Linda. "Juggling with dilemmas when promoting public health : Nurses´ and physicians´ motivating strategies towards vaccine hesitant parents." Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Institutionen för folkhälso- och vårdvetenskap, 2014. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-233288.
Full textBakgrund: För att kunna kontrollera vaccinerbara smittsamma sjukdomar är det av högsta vikt att etablera hög vaccintäckning och uppnå nivån för flockimmunitet. Preventiva folkhälsointerventioner, såsom vaccinationsprogram, skapar dilemman mellan samhällelig och individnytta. Yrkespersoner som erbjuder vaccin måste hantera detta dilemma när de motiverar föräldrar som är tveksamma till att vaccinera sina barn. Yrkespersonernas uppfattningar om nyttan med vacciner och motivationsstrategierna kan tänkas påverka föräldrarnas beslut. Strategierna behöver stödja såväl föräldrarnas autonomi, barnets rätt och samhällets bästa. Genom användande av de bioetiska principerna autonomi, godhet och rättvisa kan strategierna analyseras utifrån vilka agenter som gagnas mest. Syfte: Att få inblick i hur yrkespersoners balanserar mellan individuella, samhälleliga, föräldrarelaterade och interna värden när de promotar vaccin till föräldrar som är tveksamma till vaccin. Metod: Explorativ kvalitativ intervjustudie. Resultat: Respondenternas strategier anpassas efter föräldrarnas bakomliggande skäl till att inte vaccinera sina barn och är mer eller mindre influerande. En underliggande strategi är att använda social interaktion för att bygga förtroende hos föräldrarna. Respondenterna uppfattade nyttan med vacciner som både individuell och samhällelig och speglades i strategierna. Respondenterna siktade på att föräldrarnas beslut ska vara välgrundat. Några strategier är mer övertalande än andra och i sällsynta fall inkräktande på föräldrarnas autonomi på ett mindre lämpligt sätt. Slutsats: Fynden speglar att folkhälsodilemmat mellan individ och samhälle är närvarande i den kliniska situationen när tveksamma föräldrar ska motiveras till att vaccinera sina barn. Respondenterna gör sitt yttersta för att guida föräldrarna till ett välgrundat beslut, oavsett om barnet blir vaccinerat eller inte, oavsett vilket skäl föräldrarna har till tveksamheten. Eftersom att vaccination är en frivillig handling som krävs av många för att uppnå flockimmunitet så behöver yrkespersoner ta hänsyn till etiken kring när föräldrar motiveras till att vaccinera sina barn. Detta för att uppnå bästa möjliga resultat oavsett om det gagnar barnet, samhället eller föräldrarnas autonomi.
Lee, Kyung Hae. "Do not resuscitate : bioethical and nursing perspectives /." View thesis, 1995. http://library.uws.edu.au/adt-NUWS/public/adt-NUWS20030807.133935/index.html.
Full textPleasants, Gabriel J. "Bioethics and Human Rights: A Problem, a Proposal, and an Achievement." Thesis, Boston College, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/2345/508.
Full textThis study investigates the recent paradigm shift in bioethics to an approach that uses the language of human rights to work towards social justice and health equity. It follows the three stages of Kuhn's "paradigm shift": recognizing the fallibility of the first paradigm and proving its destructiveness, presenting the theoretical particulars of a new paradigm, and demonstrating how the new paradigm becomes operational. The case study of the organ trade shows the failure of the first model of bioethics, based on autonomy and non-maleficence. This model falsely depicts the true ethical challenges while shadowing the enormous harms it causes. An emerging bioethical model centered on human rights is presented as the best theoretical option to remedy the ills of the first paradigm and make sense of bioethical dilemmas across the globe. But the second paradigm cannot simply look better, it must be operational. Applying the human rights model, the Treatment Action Campaign in South Africa achieved universal access to antiretroviral treatment, thus confirming the theory of the new paradigm in action. The study concludes with a call for an ethics of implementation within the new paradigm that balances the radical ideal of health as a human right with concrete and pragmatic improvements in healthcare; an ethics of "being on the way" to the ultimate goal of justice and equity in health
Thesis (BA) — Boston College, 2007
Submitted to: Boston College. College of Arts and Sciences
Discipline: International Studies
Discipline: College Honors Program
Maesela, Matlou Tlakale. "The analysis of public and private healthcare in South Africa." Diss., University of Pretoria, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/2263/73473.
Full textMini Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2019.
Public Law
MPhil
Restricted
Books on the topic "Public bioethic"
Li, Hon-Lam, and Michael Campbell, eds. Public Reason and Bioethics. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61170-5.
Full textAnne, Bobinski Mary, and Hall Mark A. 1955-, eds. Bioethics and public health law. 2nd ed. New York: Aspen Publishers, 2008.
Find full textAnne, Bobinski Mary, and Orentlicher David 1955-, eds. Bioethics and public health law. New York: Aspen Publishers, 2005.
Find full textBioethics, public moral argument, and social responsibility. New York: Routledge, 2011.
Find full textNew York State Task Force on Life and the Law. A state model for public policy on bioethics. New York, NY (5 Penn Plaza, 3rd Floor, New York, 10001-1803): The Task Force, 1994.
Find full textAnnas, George J. Worst case bioethics: Death, disaster, and public health. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Find full textWorst case bioethics: Death, disaster, and public health. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Find full text1920-, Galston Arthur William, and Shurr Emily G, eds. New dimensions in bioethics: Science, ethics, and the formulation of public policy. Boston: Kluwer Academic, 2001.
Find full textBioethics in the age of new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009.
Find full textCorporation, Rand, ed. The National Bioethics Advisory Commission: Contributing to public policy. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2003.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Public bioethic"
Etzioni, Amitai. "Communitarian Bioethics." In Library of Public Policy and Public Administration, 291–302. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69623-2_19.
Full textKottow, Miguel. "Protective Bioethics." In SpringerBriefs in Public Health, 63–70. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2026-2_7.
Full textKottow, Miguel. "Bioethics in Public Health." In SpringerBriefs in Public Health, 33–44. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2026-2_4.
Full textAfolabi, Michael Olusegun. "Public Health Disasters." In Advancing Global Bioethics, 1–24. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92765-7_1.
Full textBurke, Leandra H. "Bioethics and Health Policy." In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, 384–87. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20928-9_3051.
Full textBurke, Leandra H. "Bioethics and Health Policy." In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, 1–4. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3051-1.
Full textMcPherson, David. "Public Debate." In Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics, 2340–49. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_357.
Full textKotalik, Jaro. "Public Health." In Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics, 2349–62. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_358.
Full textMcPherson, David. "Public Debate." In Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics, 1–11. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_357-1.
Full textKotalik, Jaro. "Public Health." In Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics, 1–13. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_358-1.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Public bioethic"
Vismont, F., S. Chepelev, and A. Glebov. "INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND NANOTECHNOLOGIES IN MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH AND BIOETHIC ASPECTS OF THEIR IMPLEMENTATION." In SAKHAROV READINGS 2020: ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS OF THE XXI CENTURY. Minsk, ICC of Minfin, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.46646/sakh-2020-1-51-55.
Full textLevushkin, Anatoly Nikolaevich. "BIOPOLITICS, BIOMEDICINE, BIOETHICS, BIOLAW: SYNERGY OF BIOTECHNOLOGIES." In MODERN PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS OF DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LAW AND PUBLIC LAW REGULATION. Baskir State University, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.33184/spprchppr-2022-04-22.36.
Full textLu, Jun. "Rational Thinking on Bioethics Education for Students in Public Security Colleges Surpassing Life." In 2nd International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities (ICCESSH 2017). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/iccessh-17.2017.44.
Full textSudra, Rano Indradi, and Eni Mahawati. "Medicolegal Bioethics Study Regarding Refusal of Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation Stated in the Do-Not-Resuscitate Form." In The First International Conference on Social Science, Humanity, and Public Health (ICOSHIP 2020). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210101.047.
Full text