Contents
Academic literature on the topic 'Pubblica sicurezza dell'Unione europea'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Pubblica sicurezza dell'Unione europea.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Pubblica sicurezza dell'Unione europea"
Balboni, Marco. "Diritto dell'Unione europea. Giurisprudenza." DIRITTO, IMMIGRAZIONE E CITTADINANZA, no. 2 (September 2011): 111–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/diri2011-002008.
Full textLang, Alessandra. "Ancora modifiche alla disciplina italiana sulle condizioni di ingresso, soggiorno e allontanamento dei cittadini dell'Unione." DIRITTO, IMMIGRAZIONE E CITTADINANZA, no. 3 (December 2011): 51–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/diri2011-003004.
Full textMoccia, Luigi. "Cittadinanza europea e spazio di libertŕ, sicurezza e giustizia." CITTADINANZA EUROPEA (LA), no. 1 (December 2010): 115–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/ceu2010-001006.
Full textAitala, Rosario Salvatore. "Obiettivo: La magistratura italiana e il futuro della comunitŕ internazionale." QUESTIONE GIUSTIZIA, no. 3 (July 2009): 106–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/qg2009-003010.
Full textZetter, Roger. "La securitizzazione e le politiche europee in materia di asilo e rifugiati." MONDI MIGRANTI, no. 3 (March 2010): 7–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/mm2009-003001.
Full textFabbro Carmen. "Telecomunicazioni aeronautiche: natura giuridica, regime normativo e forme di delega." International Journal of Science and Society 4, no. 4 (November 25, 2022): 388–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v4i4.584.
Full textMartín Morales, Ricardo. "El Estado de Derecho y el mercado de la verdad." CITTADINANZA EUROPEA (LA), no. 2 (January 2022): 137–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/ceu2021-002005.
Full textLombrano, Alessandro. "Dall'armonizzazione alla standardizzazione contabile. Quale via per la riforma degli ordinamenti contabili europei." ECONOMIA PUBBLICA, no. 3 (November 2021): 7–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/ep2021-003001.
Full textNicosia, Emanuele. "Misure a tutela della sicurezza pubblica e diritti del minore alla luce della Convenzione europea dei diritti dell'uomo." MINORIGIUSTIZIA, no. 3 (February 2011): 214–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/mg2010-003022.
Full textPergolizzi, Antonio, and Emanuela Somalvico. "Le bonifiche delle discariche in procedura di infrazione UE. Criticità, infiltrazioni criminali e proposte di policy." PRISMA Economia - Società - Lavoro, no. 2 (February 2022): 68–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/pri2020-002005.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Pubblica sicurezza dell'Unione europea"
BENEDETTO, F. DI. "LA PROTEZIONE DEI SETTORI STRATEGICI EUROPEI." Doctoral thesis, Università degli Studi di Milano, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/2434/345493.
Full textCavarzeran, Pietro <1991>. "Attività agricola e sicurezza alimentare nelle politiche dell'Unione Europea." Doctoral thesis, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10579/17826.
Full textFORMICI, GIULIA. "BIG DATA TRA ESIGENZE SECURITARIE E DIRITTI ALLA RISERVATEZZA E ALLA PROTEZIONE DEI DATI: QUESTIONI NORMATIVE E GIURISPRUDENZIALI IN MATERIA DI DATA RETENTION." Doctoral thesis, Università degli Studi di Milano, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/2434/831332.
Full textInternational terrorism, together with serious and transnational crimes has dramatically influenced the political and legislative debate, underling the necessity to adopt efficient instruments able to ensure a high level of security. At the same time, technological progress and technical innovations, based on the enormous amount of data (so-called Big Data) daily produced particularly through the use of telecommunications, as well as on sophisticated Artificial Intelligence systems, have created important instruments in the hands of public authorities, also for security purposes. Notwithstanding the great potentialities, it is important to detect and consider the serious risks and dangers these instruments could cause on the effective protection of fundamental rights, with particular regard to the right to privacy and data protection: a substantive violation of these rights, by consequently jeopardizing the guarantee and enjoyment of other fundamental rights such as freedom of expression or freedom of association, could ultimately endanger the very democratic nature of our societies. The affirmation of the complex and debated trio, to be identified in the strict connection between Big Data, security and privacy, represent one of the most significant and relevant challenges Legislators and Courts are asked to face, in the effort of balancing security needs in times of stress and fundamental rights’ protection. The present work aims at critically analyzing the complex relationship between the different elements composing the above-mentioned trio through the exam of a specific case study: the data retention regime, consisting of the retention and the subsequent possible access to retained data and metadata by law enforcement or intelligence agencies for security purposes. By restricting the analysis only to the European Union context, the present thesis will examine the legislative evolution as well as the most relevant European Court of Justice (ECJ) case law, by paying particular attention to the difficulties in approving a harmonized legislation on data retention at the EU level. The study will start, first of all, with the analysis of the so called e-Privacy Directive (Directive 2002/58/EC), giving the Member States the possibility to adopt national legislation establishing a data retention regime; secondly, the controversial Data Retention Directive will be examined: this legislation imposed Member States to oblige service providers to retain, in bulk, all metadata deriving from all telecommunications, related to the totality of users. The complex debate and the profound doubts and concerns expressed at the EU level by various authorities in the legislative process concerning the adoption of the DRD, together with the difficulties Member States faced in the implementation of the EU legislation, ultimately led to numerous references for preliminary rulings to the ECJ. In their decisions, the EU Judges dealt with many controversial and difficult aspects connected to the data retention regime and its limits, from the legal basis to the correct application of the principle of conferral, to the proportionality and necessity of the measures and obligations imposed. The famous landmark cases pronounced by the ECJ didn’t solve or clarify all the difficult and problematic issues linked to the data retention discipline as well as to the access regulation, as testified by a wide range of preliminary rulings still pending before the ECJ. The present work also aims at analyzing this complex topic through the public comparative law lenses, by studying the differences or similarities in the approaches and legislative choices made by three specific and selected Member States: Belgium, United Kingdom (also considering the Brexit process) and Italy. The comparative analysis will offer the opportunity to deepen the knowledge on the peculiar national approaches and on the most relevant case law of national Courts dealing with data retention regulation and determining different interpretations and applications of the criteria established at the EU level. The present work represents an opportunity to profoundly study the challenges and issues the EU Institutions as well as the Member States confronted with, in the difficult effort to find a proper balance between security needs and fundamental rights’ protection, by paying attention to the possible future developments and to the consequences related the ECJ case law both in the EU internal dimension and in the external one, looking at the complex regulation of the data transfer outside EU borders. The present research will also focus on the rather unexplored aspect of the impacts of the EU legislation and ECJ decisions affecting the EU Member States: their choices and solutions, representing different approaches to the analyzed challenges, are strictly interrelated to the EU developments, essentially based on the ECJ activism in the privacy and data protection field and, at the same time, on the inaction and lack of decisions taken by the EU legislator. The multilevel dialogue and the difficulties both the EU and the Member States addressed are a clear manifestation of the complexity and delicacy of the research topic, in which a precise recognition of the EU law scope of application demonstrated to be even more complicated and challenging.
Civello, Conigliaro Silvio. "Il diritto penale dell'unione Europea tra sicurezza e diritti fondamentali." Thesis, Paris 10, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017PA100036.
Full textThe research analyses the development of criminal law and policies of the European Union, assuming that the pursuit of security and the protection of fundamental rights have been its main driving forces and principal justifications for criminalisation.It aims, therefore to clarify what “security” and “fundamental rights” mean in this context, and to show how EU intervention in criminal field, following security and fundamental rights policies, affected and reshaped the traditional principles and categories of substantive criminal law.The research try to identify some coordinates to clarify the nature and limits of security as a protected legal interest and the purpose of protection of fundamental rights in their complex interrelationship, and their role in the Common area of Freedom, Security and Justice - which is being built by the Union also through the harmonisation of criminal law.The starting point is the marked expansive trend in criminal matters due to the current conditions of the State and of representative democracy, typical of the contemporary society.After making some preliminary considerations on western postmodern “risk” society, to highlight the challenges faced by the traditional assumptions of the liberal theory of jus puniendi, I will evaluate the evolution of principle and fundamental categories of criminal law, whose structure is being put under pressure by European harmonisation.The research belongs to the field of criminal law and EU law theory. It extensively rely on influential scholarly analysis developed in those fields and on the analysis of the relevant provisions of the Treaties and secondary EU sources, as well as on the most relevant rulings from the ECJ, also trying to pull out some broad considerations form the political and institutional document produced by the Commission, the EP and the Council of the EU
Paladini, Luca <1970>. "Gli accordi di politica estera e di sicurezza comune dell'Unione Europea." Doctoral thesis, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, 2007. http://amsdottorato.unibo.it/109/1/tesi_paladini_pdf.pdf.
Full textPaladini, Luca <1970>. "Gli accordi di politica estera e di sicurezza comune dell'Unione Europea." Doctoral thesis, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, 2007. http://amsdottorato.unibo.it/109/.
Full textBazzocchi, Valentina. "I diritti fondamentali nello spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia dell'Unione Europea." Université Robert Schuman (Strasbourg) (1971-2008), 2007. http://www.theses.fr/2007STR30007.
Full textThe Area of freedom, security and justice has increasingly become one of the fundamental objectives of the European Union. This is often analysed for the benefits that it will guarantee to the European citizens as well as to all the individuals within its territory. However, this Area has a “dark side”, namely the limits that for its own nature it might entail to individual rights. This research aims at assessing whether the acts adopted in this Area guarantee a balance between the need of security and the need of protection of individual rights. References that have been used are the ECHR, the Charter of fundamental rights of the eu and the case law of the European Court and the Court of Justice. From an analysis of the legislation that has implications on data protection; a trend has emerged to consider the security aspect as a priority. From an analysis of the legislation on the procedural rights, a trend has emerged to develop the repressive aspect of criminal law. The absence of a complete system of judicial remedies in the third pillar is limit that the national judges and the European court can only partially overcome. A treaty’s reform is therefore necessary, also in order to limit interpillar conflicts. Only a parallel development of the needs of security and of protection of individual rights can ensure the achievement of a real Area of freedom, security and justice of EU
Bazzocchi, Valentina <1976>. "I diritti fondamentali nello spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia dell'Unione Europea." Doctoral thesis, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, 2007. http://amsdottorato.unibo.it/502/1/TesiValentinaBazzocchi.pdf.
Full textBazzocchi, Valentina <1976>. "I diritti fondamentali nello spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia dell'Unione Europea." Doctoral thesis, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, 2007. http://amsdottorato.unibo.it/502/.
Full textLOZZI, NICOLE. "POLITICHE DELLA SICUREZZA E ALLERTE ALIMENTARI NELL'UNIONE EUROPEA." Doctoral thesis, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/10280/777.
Full textThe idea of research comparing the legal and policy choices which form the basis for the current agrofood safety systems derive from the observation of several cases of “food emergency”(such as BSE, dioxin contamination , bird flu, GMOs) and food alert, which occurred in the recent European history and have caused reactions and worries in public opinion. The study of the above mentioned events and the reflection upon the attitudes and the decisions about food safety made by the European Union institutions raised many different questions. First of all I wondered if this is only a European phenomenon or if it may also apply to overseas countries like the USA. I also wanted to investigate about science regulation policies ruling the safety system born to face feared or evident risks for public health (as a consequence of BSE), i.e. to understand how scientific knowledge is used in legal and policy choices and which are the political and social consequences. In effect, the emergencies, risks and uncertainties caused by the social implementation of science have increased the gap between society and institutions both at national and community level, generating mistrust not so much of scientific and technological progress but of the institutions themselves. The public isn’t only worried about “safety” meant as the likelihood of a damage occurring, but also about the unexpected social effects neglected by the institutions. Europe expressed its concerns about these situations by trying to fill the gap from different perspectives : • new governance of science; • subsequent new regulatory and policy model of science; • expertise and its credibility; • more collective decision making processes Such steps are fundamental to generate and new idea of science governance which connects the need of a more democratic science with that of a more involving society . The Democratization of science implies the acquisition by institutions of several scientific opinions involving all of the aspects of knowledge in order to obtain decisions making processes meeting social needs and, consequently, closer to citizens.
Books on the topic "Pubblica sicurezza dell'Unione europea"
La politica di sicurezza esterna dell'Unione europea. Padova: CEDAM, 2005.
Find full textManiscalco, Maria Luisa. Opinione pubblica, sicurezza e difesa europea. Soveria Mannelli (Catanzaro): Rubbettino, 2004.
Find full textObiettivo sicurezza umana per la politica estera dell'Unione europea. Padova: CLEUP, 2010.
Find full textSerena, Giusti, and Locatelli Andrea 1974-, eds. L' Europa sicura: Le politiche di sicurezza dell'Unione europea. Milano: EGEA, 2008.
Find full textMassimo, Panebianco, Risi Cosimo, and Barbirotti S, eds. Il nuovo diritto dell'Unione europea: Diritti umani, politica estera, sicurezza comune. Napoli: Editoriale scientifica, 1999.
Find full textUgo, Draetta, Parisi Nicoletta, and Rinoldi Dino, eds. Lo spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia dell'Unione europea: Princìpi fondamentali e tutela dei diritti. Napoli: Scientifica, 2008.
Find full textMariani, Paola. Le relazioni internazionali dell'Unione europea: Aspetti giuridici della politica estera, di sicurezza e difesa comune. Milano: Giuffrè, 2005.
Find full textL'integrazione europea e l'opinione pubblica cattolica: Ambienti ecclesiali, circoli intellettuali e associazionismo alla vigilia dell'unione (1945-1954). [Milan]: Edizioni Unicopli, 2020.
Find full textFulvio, Attinà, ed. La politica di sicurezza e difesa dell'Unione europea: Il cammino europeo dopo il trattato di Amsterdam. Gaeta (Latina): Artistic & Publishing Company, 2002.
Find full textLa cooperazione tra Europa e Stati Uniti nel settore dell'intelligence e del controllo parlamentare sugli organismi di informazione e sicurezza: 2. Convegno dei comitati parlamentari di controllo sui servizi di informazione e sicurezza dei paesi dell'Unione europea ... Roma: Camera dei deputati, 2005.
Find full text