Academic literature on the topic 'Psychiatrists Certification'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Psychiatrists Certification.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Psychiatrists Certification"

1

Hausman, Ken. "C/L Psychiatrists May Get Subspecialty Certification." Psychiatric News 37, no. 17 (September 6, 2002): 17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/pn.37.17.0017.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Dattilio, Frank M., Robert L. Sadoff, and Thomas G. Gutheil. "Board Certification in Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology: Separating the Chaff from the Wheat." Journal of Psychiatry & Law 31, no. 1 (March 2003): 5–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009318530303100102.

Full text
Abstract:
Psychiatrists and psychologists are under increasing pressure to obtain board certification in their areas of specialization. While this has been the norm for psychiatrists, it is less true for psychologists as of this writing. Regardless, both professionals have been permitted to testify in court without board certification, particularly since the Federal Rules of Evidence 702 tend to be somewhat broad-based in their definition of what constitutes an expert. This article reviews the basic need for board certification and reasons why it should become a requirement for those who practice forensic psychiatry and psychology. The article considers some of the reasons why individuals in both professions may have been reluctant to pursue board certification in the past, as well as some of the pitfalls encountered in the process of becoming certified. Further discussion illuminates the need for psychiatrists and psychologists to adhere to rigid requirements for credentialing and to avoid dubious alternatives such as so-called “vanity” boards that offer ongoing grandfathering periods without rigorous credentials reviews and examination. The impact of such questionable credentials on the forensic field is also discussed.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Andrade, Chittaranjan. "Anesthesiological training and certification for psychiatrists practising unmodified ECT." Indian Journal of Psychiatry 55, no. 1 (2013): 98. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.105536.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Ray, D. C., M. A. Raciti, and C. V. Ford. "Ageism in Psychiatrists: Associations with Gender, Certification, and Theoretical Orientation." Gerontologist 25, no. 5 (October 1, 1985): 496–500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geront/25.5.496.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Mortimer, Ann M. "Guns and psychiatry: what psychiatrists need to know." BJPsych Advances 26, no. 1 (May 10, 2019): 41–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bja.2019.23.

Full text
Abstract:
SUMMARYThe private ownership of firearms for participation in shooting sports, subject to a rigorous process of certification by the police, is not uncommon in the UK. Primary care medical involvement in this process is currently a contentious issue. The mental health of firearms owners is clearly germane to public safety: suicide is by far the greatest concern, alongside security breaches. Homicide committed with legally held firearms is very rare: there is very little cross-over between legitimate shooting sports and crime involving firearms. The perpetrators of family annihilation and single-incident mass killings using firearms in the UK have not been known to psychiatry, although a minority have been found to be mentally disordered post hoc. Regarding suicidality, there is little if any difference between those at risk who own firearms and those who do not, excepting that firearm suicide attempts are highly likely to be fatal. Guidance is offered in this article on the identification of patients who own firearms, the evaluation of risks and how to manage these in practical terms.LEARNING OBJECTIVESAfter reading this article you will be able to: •demonstrate a basic knowledge of varieties of sporting firearms and understand the differences between legitimate and criminal use of firearms in the UK•appreciate mental health problems related to the private ownership of firearms and the risks of suicidality•understand the role of the police in certification and how to raise concerns when a patient's access to firearms is an issue.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Epstein, Richard H. "Pain Medicine Board Certification Status Among Physicians Performing Interventional Pain Procedures in the State of Florida Between 2010 and 2016." Pain Physician 1;23, no. 1;1 (January 14, 2020): E7—E18. http://dx.doi.org/10.36076/ppj.2020/23/e7.

Full text
Abstract:
Background: The US Department of Health and Human Services has recommended that physicians performing interventional pain procedures be credentialed based on criteria‑based guidelines and minimum training requirements. Objectives: To quantitatively assess gaps in certification related to pain medicine fellowship requirements, we studied the distribution of such procedures in Florida between 2010 and 2016. Study Design: This research involved a retrospective analysis with a sample size of n = 1,885,442 interventional pain procedures. Setting: Data describing interventional pain procedures performed in Florida between January 2010 and December 2016 were obtained from the Florida Department of Health. The National Provider Identifier file and board certification lists from the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS), the American Board of Pain Medicine (ABPM), and the American Board of Interventional Pain Physicians (ABIPP) corresponding to this time frame were also obtained. Methods: The datasets were linked to determine the specialty of physicians performing interventional pain procedures, and whether or not they were pain medicine diplomates of the ABMS, the ABPM, or the ABIPP. The similarity index Θ was calculated for the distribution of interventional pain procedure codes among medical specialty groups, and with respect to the practitioners’ pain medicine board certification status. Results: Of the interventional pain procedures, anesthesiologists performed 63.5%, physiatrists 19.1%, neurologists or psychiatrists 5.2%, and other practitioners 12.3%. Among procedures performed by anesthesiologists, physiatrists, and psychiatrists or neurologists, 66.2%, 50.3%, and 50.4% were by ABMS pain board-certified practitioners, respectively. Practitioners without ABMS pain medicine boards performed 45.8% of interventional pain procedures. Practitioners without such boards from either the ABMS, ABPM, or ABIPP performed 37.7%. There was very large similarity (Θ > 0.9) in the distribution of procedures comparing ABMS pain medicine boardcertified practitioners to non-ABMS pain medicine board-certified anesthesiologists, physiatrists, or all other specialties. Limitations: In countries other than the United States, where pain medicine board certification is relatively recent, there may be a higher percentage of interventional pain procedures performed by individuals without certification than we report. In “opt-out” states, where nurse anesthetists can independently perform interventional pain procedures, the percentage of interventional pain procedures performed by individuals without physician pain medicine board certification may also be higher. The datasets we used do not contain information to allow assessment of outcomes or effectiveness resulting from pain medicine board certification. Conclusions: Approximately one-third of interventional pain procedures were performed by physicians without at least 1 of the 3 pain medicine board certifications. In addition, the practitioners performed very similar distributions of procedures (i.e., those without pain medicine board certification, overall, have not restricted their practice). These results suggest the need for additional accredited pain medicine fellowship training positions for newly graduated residents. The results also show that, for the recommendations of the Department of Health and Human Services to be satisfied, physicians without board certification performing intervention procedures would need to obtain ABPM or ABIPP certification, or ABMS certification after completion of a full-time Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education pain medicine fellowship. Key words: Chronic pain, education, medical, graduate, specialty boards
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Laliberté, Vincent, Mark J. Rapoport, Kiran Rabheru, and Soham Rej. "Practice eligible route for certification in geriatric psychiatry: why some Canadian psychiatrists are disinterested in writing the RCPSC subspeciality examination?" International Psychogeriatrics 28, no. 10 (July 14, 2016): 1749–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1041610216000909.

Full text
Abstract:
Geriatric psychiatry was officially recognized as a subspecialty by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) in 2009, with the first RCPSC exam written in 2013 (Andrew and Shea, 2010). The unique mental health needs of Canadians’ seniors requires geriatric psychiatrists trained to address them (Herrmann, 2004), but current rates of recruitment in informal fellowship programs have been inadequate (Bragg et al., 2012). One hope of subspeciality recognition was to increase recruitment in Canada, but there have been some challenges in accrediting psychiatrists already caring for older adults. Many currently practicing geriatric psychiatrists have elected to take the Royal College examination, with >120 graduates in the first year, 2013, but others have been more ambivalent. In this letter, we perform a preliminary exploration of the prevalence and correlates of disinterest in completing the RCPSC geriatric psychiatry examination.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Mayer, S., R. J. van der Gaag, G. Dom, D. Wassermann, W. Gaebel, P. Falkai, and C. Schüle. "European Psychiatric Association (EPA) Guidance on Post-graduate Psychiatric Training in Europe." European Psychiatry 29, no. 2 (February 2014): 101–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2014.01.002.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThe European Union Free Movement Directive gives professionals the opportunity to work and live within the European Union, but does not give specific requirements regarding how the specialists in medicine have to be trained, with the exception of a required minimum of 4 years of education. Efforts have been undertaken to harmonize post-graduate training in psychiatry in Europe since the Treaty of Rome 1957, with the founding of the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS) and establishment of a charter outlining how psychiatrists should be trained. However, the different curricula for post-graduate training were only compared by surveys, never through a systematic review of the official national requirements. The published survey data still shows great differences between European countries and unlike other UEMS Boards, the Board of Psychiatry did not introduce a certification for specialists willing to practice in a foreign country within Europe. Such a European certification could help to keep a high qualification level for post-graduate training in psychiatry all over Europe. Moreover, it would make it easier for employers to assess the educational level of European psychiatrists applying for a job in their field.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Shapovalova, LA, and KA Shapovalov. "Organizational and methodological aspects of the work of a psychiatrist on a qualification category. Current status and prospects of psychiatric care in Russia." Archives of Psychiatry and Mental Health 6, no. 1 (February 16, 2022): 001–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.29328/journal.apmh.1001035.

Full text
Abstract:
Introduction: Preparing a report and passing certification for a qualification category is one of the forms of improving the professional level of each medical worker. Material and methods: The analysis of 5 qualification works of a psychiatrist (1997, 2002, 2008, 2013, and 2018) was carried out for the mandatory requirements for the preparation of documents when they were submitted to the Attestation Commission on the assignment of a qualifying medical category in psychiatry and formation methodological approaches to their implementation. The depth of research was 27 years. Results: Methodological approaches to the design of 11 mandatory sections provided for in the certification work of a psychiatrist presented for the award of a qualification category were considered. Discussion: The attitude to the Administrative Regulations for the provision of state services for the assignment of a qualification category to specialists engaged in medical and pharmaceutical activities should be revised in terms of its synchronization with the official duties of a doctor. Conclusion: The dynamic development of the regulatory, organizational, methodological, and scientific aspects of medicine and psychiatry, in particular, in the period of active digitalization of healthcare, requires periodic corporate discussion and correction of the Administrative Regulations for the provision of public services for assigning a qualification category to specialists engaged in medical and pharmaceutical activities. Attention should be paid to the insufficient statistical processing of the submitted materials by applicants for the assignment of the 1st and highest categories, the lack of calculations, references, and comparisons of confidence intervals, and the reliability of the study. Preparing a report and passing certification for a qualification category can be the first step in introducing a practitioner to scientific work through the generalization of personal work experience, worthy of speaking at a scientific and practical conference at the level of LU and the region and publishing abstracts in collections and scientific and practical journals. The proposed methodological approaches are purely advisory in nature and can be used by psychiatrists when working on a qualification category at their discretion.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Juul, Dorthea, Kerry H. Levin, Laurie Gutmann, and Larry R. Faulkner. "Subspecialization in clinical neurophysiology." Neurology 95, no. 15 (August 26, 2020): 686–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000010706.

Full text
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo describe the development and current status of training and certification in clinical neurophysiology (CNP); to explore the impact of the newer subspecialties in sleep medicine, neuromuscular medicine, and epilepsy; and to obtain information about aspects of practice in the subspecialty.MethodsInformation about training programs and certification was obtained from the records of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, and diplomates were surveyed about their CNP practice activities and attitudes toward certification/recertification.ResultsIn the years since the first examination was administered, a robust number of CNP training programs developed, but recently, there has been a decrease in the number of programs and fellows, although the number of programs and fellows in the subspecialties of epilepsy, neuromuscular medicine, and sleep medicine has increased. A diplomate survey indicated that most respondents devoted significant practice time to CNP procedures, especially to EEGs and EMGs. Although more diplomates performed EEGs than EMGs, a substantial portion performed both. Most diplomates were planning to or had maintained certification in CNP.ConclusionOver 3,000 neurologists, child neurologists, and psychiatrists have obtained certification in CNP, and the majority are participating in recertification. Although the newer and overlapping subspecialties of epilepsy, neuromuscular medicine, and sleep medicine may be having a negative impact on CNP, it continues to have a relatively large number of programs and attracts a relatively large number of fellows.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Psychiatrists Certification"

1

1940-, Shore James H., and Scheiber Stephen C, eds. Certification, recertification, and lifetime learning in psychiatry. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1994.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Psychiatry review and Canadian certification exam preparation guide. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Pub., 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

R, Morrison James. Boarding time: A psychiatry candidate's guide to part II of the ABPN examination. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

A, Muñoz Rodrigo, ed. Boarding time: A psychiatry candidate's guide to part II of the ABPN examination. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1991.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

A, Muñoz Rodrigo, and American Psychiatric Association, eds. Boarding time: The psychiatry candidate's new guide to part II of the ABPN examination. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Thomas, Ann, Kristen Moeller, Deborah J. Hales, and Mark Hyman Rapaport. FOCUS Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Maintenance of Certification (MOC) Workbook. American Psychiatric Association Publishing, 2014.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

800 Individual Statement Questions for Mrcpsych. Royal Society of Medicine Press, 2001.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Bourgeois, James A., Usha Parthasarathi, and Ana Hategan. Psychiatry Review and Canadian Certification Exam Preparation Guide. American Psychiatric Association Publishing, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Tampi, Rajesh, Kristina Zdanys, and Mark Oldham, eds. Psychiatry Board Review. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190265557.001.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
The field of psychiatry is rapidly evolving, specifically in the areas of psychopharmacology, psychotherapeutic strategies, and the classification of many major psychiatric disorders with the implementation of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5 in 2013. A new board review textbook is imperative to address these changes in order to prepare board-eligible psychiatrists for the certification examination as well as for clinical practice in general. Additionally, the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology is in the process of phasing in the DSM-5 criteria to the board examination, such that by 2017 the examination material will exclusively reflect the new manual. The book is aimed primarily at board-eligible psychiatrists preparing for their Initial certification in psychiatry. It will be a useful study tool for psychiatrists renewing certification as well, which in the United States is required every ten years. Furthermore the text will also be a useful reference for all psychiatrists in clinical practice to familiarize themselves with the new diagnostic classifications of DSM-5, the latest psychopharmacologic treatment strategies, and psychotherapeutic techniques.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Documentation Survival Handbook for Psychiatrists and Other Mental Health Professionals: A Clinician's Guide to Charting for Better Care, Certification. Hogrefe & Huber Pub, 1993.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Psychiatrists Certification"

1

Packer, Ira K., and Thomas Grisso. "The Designated Forensic Professional Program in Massachusetts." In University and Public Behavioral Health Organization Collaboration in Justice Contexts, 30–44. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med-psych/9780190052850.003.0003.

Full text
Abstract:
The Designated Forensic Professional Program in Massachusetts, a collaboration between the University of Massachusetts Medical School and the Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, was started in 1985 for the purpose of providing specialty training and certification to mental health professionals providing public-sector evaluations of competence to stand trial and criminal responsibility to the Massachusetts courts. The program initially certified only psychologists but was eventually expanded to include forensic psychiatrists as well. The approach involves intensive mentoring and supervision and serves as a national model for states wishing to train public sector mental health professionals in the delivery of specialized forensic evaluations.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography