Academic literature on the topic 'Property law (excl. intellectual property law)'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Property law (excl. intellectual property law).'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Property law (excl. intellectual property law)"
SUMIKURA, Koichi. "Intellectual Property Law." Journal of the Society of Mechanical Engineers 111, no. 1070 (2008): 14–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1299/jsmemag.111.1070_14.
Full textWinston, Beth. "Intellectual Property Law." Imagine 6, no. 5 (1999): 12–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/imag.2003.0043.
Full textNewman, Simon. "Intellectual property law." Computer Law & Security Review 13, no. 2 (March 1997): 96–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0267-3649(97)89743-9.
Full textHeath, Christopher, Carl-Bernd Kaehlig, Gregory Churchill, and Christoph Antons. "Indonesian Intellectual Property Law." American Journal of Comparative Law 44, no. 4 (1996): 669. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/840626.
Full textGrunseit, Anna. "Overview: Intellectual Property Law." Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 3, no. 1 (2014): 294–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.7574/cjicl.03.01.166.
Full textSamuelson, Pamela. "Hacking intellectual property law." Communications of the ACM 51, no. 1 (January 2008): 65–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1327452.1327482.
Full textAllcock, John P. M. "Intellectual property law cases." Engineering Management Journal 3, no. 1 (1993): 12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/em:19930004.
Full textAllcock, John P. M. "Intellectual property law cases." Engineering Management Journal 3, no. 3 (1993): 107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/em:19930028.
Full textAllcock, John P. M. "Intellectual property law cases." Engineering Management Journal 3, no. 5 (1993): 201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/em:19930062.
Full textAllcock, J. P. M. "Intellectual property law cases." Engineering Management Journal 11, no. 5 (2001): 204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/em:20010511.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Property law (excl. intellectual property law)"
Rimmer, Matthew. "The Pirate Bazaar: The Social Life of Copyright Law." Thesis, The Faculty of Law, The University of New South Wales, 2001. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/86581/1/fulltext.pdf.
Full textAntons, Christoph Hubert Jakob. "Intellectual property law in Indonesia /." The Hague [u.a.] : Kluwer Law International, 2000. http://www.gbv.de/dms/spk/sbb/recht/toc/31965043X.pdf.
Full textMoore, Adam D. "A Lockean Theory of Intellectual Property." Connect to resource, 1997. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc%5Fnum=osu1214419634.
Full textSoepboer, Mick. "Libertarian views on intellectual property law." Master's thesis, University of Cape Town, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/4557.
Full textBhattacharya, Raja. "Intellectual property rights in outer space." Thesis, McGill University, 2002. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=78203.
Full textThis thesis deals with IP issues in international perspective (with reference, however, to some leading national IP legislation when and where it is necessary) with special reference to the contemporary legal regime governing outer space. While emphasizing the existing legal regime relating to IPRs in outer space, it explores the possibility of commercial exploitation of IPRs made in space and on ground through the existing international trade system. The increasing importance of cooperation between the World Intellectual Property Organization and World Trade Organization in this regard is also examined, against the back drop of space activities and the outer space legal regime relating to IPRs. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)
Fraessdorf, Henning. "Intellectual property in standards." Thesis, McGill University, 2002. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=78214.
Full textThe thesis evaluates the soundness of a general argument of standardization for weaker protection in intellectual property law. It elaborates the arguments that are put forward to justify weaker protection in standards regarding the characteristics of standards and standardization as well as the justifications for intellectual property. It analyses the applicability of trademark, copyright and patent law to both already existing as well as developing standards. In particular, the concepts of genericness and descriptiveness in trademark law, the merger and scenes a faire doctrines in copyright law and the doctrines of patent misuse and patent abuse in patent law are discussed.
Fonseca, Da Silva Antonio Carlos. "Limiting intellectual property : the competition interface." Thesis, Queen Mary, University of London, 1997. http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/1693.
Full textKellerman, Mikhalien. "The Constitutional Property Clause and Immaterial Property Interests." Thesis, Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/6536.
Full textENGLISH ABSTRACT: The question that this dissertation addresses is which immaterial property interests may be recognised and protected under the constitutional property clause and if so, under which circumstances. The question originated in the First Certification case 1 where the court held that the constitutional property clause is wide enough to include property interests that require protection according to international norms. The traditional immaterial property interests or intellectual property rights (patents, copyright, designs and trademarks) are protected as property in private law on a sui generis basis. Since it is generally accepted that the property concept in constitutional law includes at least property rights protected in private law, it is relatively unproblematic to include intellectual property rights under the constitutional property clause. In Laugh It Off v SAB International,2 the Constitutional Court explicitly balanced the right to a trademark with the right to freedom of expression, which is accepted as authority that at least trademarks may be recognised and protected as constitutional property. The other intellectual property rights may most likely be recognised and protected by analogy. Foreign law as well as international law also indicates that intellectual property should be recognised and protected as constitutional property. However, there are other, unconventional immaterial property interests that are not protected as property in private law. Some are protected in private law, but not as property; others originate in public law; and yet others are not protected yet at all. In terms of the Constitution, South African courts may consider foreign law, but must consider international law. This dissertation determines when these interests may be protected as constitutional property by reference to foreign cases from German, American, Australian and Irish law; regional international law, namely European Union cases; and international law. The conclusion is that unconventional immaterial property interests may generally be protected if they are vested and acquired in terms of normal law, have patrimonial value and serve the general purpose of constitutional property protection. Property theories are also useful to determine when immaterial property interests deserve constitutional protection, although other theories may be more useful for some of the unconventional interests. The German scaling approach and the balancing of competing interests is a useful approach for South African courts to help determine the appropriate level of protection for specific immaterial property interests without excluding some at the outset.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Die vraag waarmee hierdie verhandeling handel is of belange in immateriële goedere erken en beskerm kan word in terme van die grondwetlike eiendomsklousule en indien wel, onder watter omstandighede. Die vraag het sy ontstaan in die First Certification saak,3 waar die Grondwetlike Hof beslis het dat die eiendomsklousule se omvang wyd genoeg is om belange in eiendom in te sluit wat volgens internasionale norme beskerming verg. Sekere regte in immateriële goedere word op ’n sui generis basis in die privaatreg beskerm, naamlik die regte in tradisionele immaterieelgoederereg kategorieë of intellektuele eiendom (patente, kopiereg, ontwerpe en handelsmerke). Dit is 'n algemene beginsel van grondwetlike eiendomsreg dat die konsep van eiendom minstens belange insluit wat as eiendom in die privaatreg beskerm word. In Laugh It Off v SAB International4 het die Grondwetlike Hof 'n handelsmerkreg opgeweeg teen die reg op vryheid van uitdrukking en hierdeur implisiet erken dat minstens handelsmerke en dalk ook ander intellektuele eindemsregte deur die eiendomsklousule erken en beskerm kan word. Buitelandse reg sowel as internasionale reg dui aan dat intellektuele eiendom grondwetlike beskerming behoort te ontvang. Buiten hierdie belange is daar ook immaterieelgoederereg belange wat nie onder eiendomsreg beskerm word in die privaatreg nie. Sommige van hierdie belange word wel in die privaatreg beskerm, maar dan onder ander areas van die reg as eiendom; ander het hul oorsprong in die publiekreg; en die res word tans glad nie beskerm nie. Die Grondwet bepaal dat howe buitelandse reg in ag kan neem en dat hulle internasionale reg moet oorweeg. Die verhandeling se vraag word beantwoord met verwysing na sake uit die Duitse, Amerikaanse, Australiese en Ierse grondwetlike reg; streeks-internasionale reg van die Europese Unie; en internasionale reg. Die onkonvensionele immaterieelgoederereg belange kan oor die algemeen beskerm word as eiendom indien daar 'n gevestigde reg is, die reg in terme van gewone reg verkry is en die belang die algemene oogmerke van die grondwetlike klousule bevorder. Die teorieë oor die beskerming van eiendom is van nut om te bepaal watter belange beskerm kan word, alhoewel sekere onkonvensionele belange beter geregverdig kan word deur ander tipes teorieë. Die Duitse metode om belange op te weeg kan van besonderse nut wees vir Suid Afrikaanse howe om te bepaal watter vlak van beskerming spesifieke belange in immaterieelgoedere behoort te geniet.
Azmi, Ida Madieha Bt Abdul Ghani. "Intellectual property laws and Islam in Malaysia." Thesis, Queen Mary, University of London, 1995. http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/1418.
Full textChung, Shang-pei. "Patents as property in Taiwanese jurisprudence : rebuilding a property model for patents." Thesis, Queen Mary, University of London, 2012. http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/8381.
Full textBooks on the topic "Property law (excl. intellectual property law)"
Intellectual property law. 4th ed. Oxford, U.K: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Find full textBrad, Sherman, ed. Intellectual property law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Find full textEdenborough, Michael. Intellectual property law. London: Cavendish Pub., 1995.
Find full textAfrica, South. Intellectual property law. Cape Town: Juta Law, 2010.
Find full textHossain, Naznin. Intellectual property law. Mirapura: Phātemā Bukas eṇḍa Bhyārāiṭija, 2009.
Find full textCoombe, Rosemary. Intellectual property law. [Toronto, Ont: Faculty of Law, University of Toronto], 1991.
Find full textNarayanan, P. Intellectual property law. Calcutta: Eastern Law House, 1990.
Find full textBently, Lionel. Intellectual property law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Find full textPaul, Torremans, ed. Intellectual property law. London: Butterworths, 1995.
Find full textDavis, Jennifer. Intellectual property law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Property law (excl. intellectual property law)"
Kelly, David, Ruby Hammer, Janice Denoncourt, and John Hendy. "Intellectual property." In Business Law, 597–643. Fourth edition. | Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY : Routledge, 2020.: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429297694-26.
Full textCaristi, Dom, William R. Davie, and Laurie Thomas Lee. "Intellectual Property." In Communication Law, 191–245. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003091660-7.
Full textDenoncourt, Janice. "Intellectual property." In business law, 577–616. Third edition. | Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY: Routledge, 2017.: Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315726205-26.
Full textCaristi, Dom, and William R. Davie. "Intellectual Property." In Communication Law, 151–87. Second edition. | New York, NY : Routledge, 2018.: Routledge, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315448367-7.
Full textWalters, Robert, Leon Trakman, and Bruno Zeller. "Intellectual Property." In Data Protection Law, 293–315. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8110-2_12.
Full textGrabowski, Mark, and Eric P. Robinson. "Intellectual Property." In Cyber Law and Ethics, 114–41. London: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003027782-7.
Full textMoore, Roy L., Michael D. Murray, and Kyu Ho Youm. "Intellectual Property." In Media Law and Ethics, 371–433. 6th ed. New York: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003166870-9.
Full textWright, David. "Intellectual property." In Law for Project Managers, 117–24. 2nd edition. | Abingdon, Oxon [UK] ; New York : Routledge, 2017.: Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315160757-20.
Full textMoore, Roy L., Michael D. Murray, J. Michael Farrell, and Kyu Ho Youm. "Intellectual Property." In Media Law and Ethics, 527–602. 5th edition. | New York : Routledge, [2018] |: Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315270746-14.
Full textLee, William E., Daxton R. Stewart, and Jonathan Peters. "Intellectual Property." In The Law of Public Communication, 245–90. 11th edition. | New York : Routledge, 2020.: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003043362-6.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Property law (excl. intellectual property law)"
Irish, V. "Intellectual property rights." In IEE Colloquium on `Principles of Law for Engineers and Managers'. IEE, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/ic:19961420.
Full textAllcock, J. P. M. "Intellectual property case study." In IEE Colloquium on `Principles of Law for Engineers and Managers'. IEE, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/ic:19961320.
Full textTakahashi, Timothy T. "Intellectual Property Law and Legacy FORTRAN Code." In 2013 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference. Reston, Virginia: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-4210.
Full textJanković, Dijana. "DIFFERENT LEGAL ASPECTS OF THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS." In PROCEDURAL ASPECTS OF EU LAW. Faculty of Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.25234/eclic/6526.
Full textPrasetyadji, Kuncoroadi, Witri Aulia Maudy, and Supandi. "Defense Economics Viewpoint of Intellectual Property Rights." In International Conference on Law, Economics and Health (ICLEH 2020). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200513.030.
Full textDavis, D. "Intellectual property rights: practical issues." In IET Seminar on Railway Law for Engineers: How Legislation, Liability and Legal Issues Affect You. IEE, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/ic:20080599.
Full textMashdurohatun, Anis. "Transfer of Intellectual Property Rights (Studies on the Division of Joint Property (Gono-gini) Post-Divorce)." In International Conference on Law Reform (INCLAR 2019). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200226.014.
Full textPinsky, Lawrence. "Aspects of Intellectual Property Law for HEP Software Developers." In XII Advanced Computing and Analysis Techniques in Physics Research. Trieste, Italy: Sissa Medialab, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.22323/1.070.0003.
Full textSchwartz, Jeff E., Richard T. Girards, and Karen A. Borrelli. "U.S. Patent/Intellectual Property Law: What Should Engineers Know?" In ASME 2000 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/imece2000-1190.
Full textGatsolaeva, Aleftina, and Madina Dzagurova. "Intellectual Property Law: Origin and Development as an Institute of Constitutional-Legal Regulation." In XIV European-Asian Congress "The value of law" (EAC-LAW 2020). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201205.015.
Full textReports on the topic "Property law (excl. intellectual property law)"
Correa, Carlos M. Intellectual Property and Competition Law. Geneva, Switzerland: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.7215/ip_ip_20080820.
Full textRuse â Khan, Henning Grosse. Sustainable Development In International Intellectual Property Law. Geneva, Switzerland: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.7215/ip_ip_20101011.
Full textUlises Espinoza, Ulises Espinoza. Intuitions about Ownership Among Achuar Communities and the Misalignment of Intellectual Property Law. Experiment, March 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.18258/25118.
Full textAbbott, Frederick M. Intellectual Property Provisions of bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements in light of US Federal Law. Geneva, Switzerland: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.7215/ip_ip_20060201a.
Full textMinero Alejandre, Gemma. Ownership of Databases: Personal Data Protection and Intellectual Property Rights on Databases. Universitätsbibliothek J. C. Senckenberg, Frankfurt am Main, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.21248/gups.64578.
Full textReyes Díaz, Carlos Humberto. Working Paper PUEAA No. 8. CPTPP. Legal Trends. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Programa Universitario de Estudios sobre Asia y África, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/pueaa.006r.2022.
Full text