Academic literature on the topic 'Property law'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Property law.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Property law"
Boggenpoel, ZT. "Property Law." Yearbook of South African Law 1 (2020): 942–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.47348/ysal/v1/i1a19.
Full textKohler, Paul. "Property Law." Current Legal Problems 46, Part_1 (January 1, 1993): 69–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/clp/46.part_1.69.
Full textClarke, A. "Property Law." Current Legal Problems 45, Part 1 (January 1, 1992): 81–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/clp/45.part_1.81.
Full textClarke, A. "Property Law." Current Legal Problems 48, Part 1 (January 1, 1995): 113–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/clp/48.part_1.113.
Full textBoggenpoel, ZT. "Property Law." Yearbook of South African Law 1 (2020): 942–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.47348/ysal/v1/i1a19.
Full textBlankfein-Tabachnick, David. "Property, Duress, and Consensual Relationships." Michigan Law Review, no. 114.6 (2016): 1013. http://dx.doi.org/10.36644/mlr.114.6.property.
Full textConroy, Declan. "Property Rights in Augmented Reality." Michigan Technology Law Review, no. 24.1 (2017): 17. http://dx.doi.org/10.36645/mtlr.24.1.property.
Full textSibanda, Nkanyiso. "Constitutional Property Law." Yearbook of South African Law 1 (2020): 315–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.47348/ysal/v1/i1a6.
Full textSUMIKURA, Koichi. "Intellectual Property Law." Journal of the Society of Mechanical Engineers 111, no. 1070 (2008): 14–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1299/jsmemag.111.1070_14.
Full textWinston, Beth. "Intellectual Property Law." Imagine 6, no. 5 (1999): 12–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/imag.2003.0043.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Property law"
Gibbons, Robert C. "Florida's common-law corporation sole an historical, civil law, and canon law analysis /." Theological Research Exchange Network (TREN), 2005. http://www.tren.com.
Full textMacLeod, Rebecca Frances. "Property law in Jersey." Thesis, University of Edinburgh, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/1842/6299.
Full textKellerman, Mikhalien. "The Constitutional Property Clause and Immaterial Property Interests." Thesis, Stellenbosch : University of Stellenbosch, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/6536.
Full textENGLISH ABSTRACT: The question that this dissertation addresses is which immaterial property interests may be recognised and protected under the constitutional property clause and if so, under which circumstances. The question originated in the First Certification case 1 where the court held that the constitutional property clause is wide enough to include property interests that require protection according to international norms. The traditional immaterial property interests or intellectual property rights (patents, copyright, designs and trademarks) are protected as property in private law on a sui generis basis. Since it is generally accepted that the property concept in constitutional law includes at least property rights protected in private law, it is relatively unproblematic to include intellectual property rights under the constitutional property clause. In Laugh It Off v SAB International,2 the Constitutional Court explicitly balanced the right to a trademark with the right to freedom of expression, which is accepted as authority that at least trademarks may be recognised and protected as constitutional property. The other intellectual property rights may most likely be recognised and protected by analogy. Foreign law as well as international law also indicates that intellectual property should be recognised and protected as constitutional property. However, there are other, unconventional immaterial property interests that are not protected as property in private law. Some are protected in private law, but not as property; others originate in public law; and yet others are not protected yet at all. In terms of the Constitution, South African courts may consider foreign law, but must consider international law. This dissertation determines when these interests may be protected as constitutional property by reference to foreign cases from German, American, Australian and Irish law; regional international law, namely European Union cases; and international law. The conclusion is that unconventional immaterial property interests may generally be protected if they are vested and acquired in terms of normal law, have patrimonial value and serve the general purpose of constitutional property protection. Property theories are also useful to determine when immaterial property interests deserve constitutional protection, although other theories may be more useful for some of the unconventional interests. The German scaling approach and the balancing of competing interests is a useful approach for South African courts to help determine the appropriate level of protection for specific immaterial property interests without excluding some at the outset.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Die vraag waarmee hierdie verhandeling handel is of belange in immateriële goedere erken en beskerm kan word in terme van die grondwetlike eiendomsklousule en indien wel, onder watter omstandighede. Die vraag het sy ontstaan in die First Certification saak,3 waar die Grondwetlike Hof beslis het dat die eiendomsklousule se omvang wyd genoeg is om belange in eiendom in te sluit wat volgens internasionale norme beskerming verg. Sekere regte in immateriële goedere word op ’n sui generis basis in die privaatreg beskerm, naamlik die regte in tradisionele immaterieelgoederereg kategorieë of intellektuele eiendom (patente, kopiereg, ontwerpe en handelsmerke). Dit is 'n algemene beginsel van grondwetlike eiendomsreg dat die konsep van eiendom minstens belange insluit wat as eiendom in die privaatreg beskerm word. In Laugh It Off v SAB International4 het die Grondwetlike Hof 'n handelsmerkreg opgeweeg teen die reg op vryheid van uitdrukking en hierdeur implisiet erken dat minstens handelsmerke en dalk ook ander intellektuele eindemsregte deur die eiendomsklousule erken en beskerm kan word. Buitelandse reg sowel as internasionale reg dui aan dat intellektuele eiendom grondwetlike beskerming behoort te ontvang. Buiten hierdie belange is daar ook immaterieelgoederereg belange wat nie onder eiendomsreg beskerm word in die privaatreg nie. Sommige van hierdie belange word wel in die privaatreg beskerm, maar dan onder ander areas van die reg as eiendom; ander het hul oorsprong in die publiekreg; en die res word tans glad nie beskerm nie. Die Grondwet bepaal dat howe buitelandse reg in ag kan neem en dat hulle internasionale reg moet oorweeg. Die verhandeling se vraag word beantwoord met verwysing na sake uit die Duitse, Amerikaanse, Australiese en Ierse grondwetlike reg; streeks-internasionale reg van die Europese Unie; en internasionale reg. Die onkonvensionele immaterieelgoederereg belange kan oor die algemeen beskerm word as eiendom indien daar 'n gevestigde reg is, die reg in terme van gewone reg verkry is en die belang die algemene oogmerke van die grondwetlike klousule bevorder. Die teorieë oor die beskerming van eiendom is van nut om te bepaal watter belange beskerm kan word, alhoewel sekere onkonvensionele belange beter geregverdig kan word deur ander tipes teorieë. Die Duitse metode om belange op te weeg kan van besonderse nut wees vir Suid Afrikaanse howe om te bepaal watter vlak van beskerming spesifieke belange in immaterieelgoedere behoort te geniet.
Antons, Christoph Hubert Jakob. "Intellectual property law in Indonesia /." The Hague [u.a.] : Kluwer Law International, 2000. http://www.gbv.de/dms/spk/sbb/recht/toc/31965043X.pdf.
Full textOldham, Mika. "Cohabitees, property and the law." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 1991. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.239494.
Full textTurnbull, Christopher J. "Family law property settlements: Principled law reform for separated families." Thesis, Queensland University of Technology, 2017. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/113831/1/Christopher_Turnbull_Thesis.pdf.
Full textErlank, Wian. "Property in virtual worlds." Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/71649.
Full textIncludes bibliography
ENGLISH ABSTRACT: This dissertation analyses and investigates how virtual property functions inside virtual worlds. It also determines if, within that context, virtual property is similar to, or should be treated like real world property. The questions that are addressed include the following. What is the (real world) legal status of property in virtual worlds? Is it worthwhile to recognise and protect virtual property in real world law? Is it possible to recognise and protect virtual property in real world law, given the differences? Would recognition and protection of virtual property in real world law require or be restricted to instances where virtual property is or can be recognised as real rights? The dissertation finds that there is a definable concept of “virtual property” as it is encountered in virtual worlds and there is a great degree of similarity between the function of property in virtual and real world systems. There are also sufficient justifications (social, economic and normative) to recognise virtual property as property. Even though the function of property is similar in both systems, the similarities are undermined by the absence, complete or almost complete, of real rights in virtual worlds. This creates a problem since, in real world law, real rights enjoy stronger protection than weaker personal rights. The first reason for this absence of real rights stems from the unique (and mostly uncircumventable) nature of game-code that removes the necessity to make all rights in virtual worlds real rights. The second reason relates to the fact that most virtual world rights are completely derived from and regulated by contract. It is concluded that it is possible to recognise and protect virtual property by means of traditional private law property law (both Roman-Germanic and Anglo-American), constitutional property law, and criminal law. While criminal law will fill some gaps left by the absence of real rights, the rest that are left are contractual rights. In certain circumstances, these contractual rights may be strong enough and in other cases they may require support from special legislation that strengthens weak personal rights and makes them into stronger property-like rights. In constitutional cases, these rights derive support from constitutional property law. However, in other circumstances recognition and protection will probably require recognition of real rights.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Hierdie proefskrif analiseer en ondersoek hoe virtuele eiendom in virtuele wêrelde werk. Dit gee ʼn oorsig oor die vraag of virtuele eiendom, in daardie konteks, vergelykbaar is met eiendom in die regte wêreld en dieselfde erkenning moet ontvang. Die volgende vrae word gestel en beantwoord. Wat is die (regte wêreld-) status van eiendom in ʼn virtuele wêreld? Is dit die moeite werd om virtuele eiendom in die regte wêreld-regstelsels te erken en te beskerm? Is dit moontlik om virtuele eiendom in die regte wêreld te erken en beskerm, gegewe die verskille? Sal erkenning en beskerming van virtuele eiendom in die regte wêreld-regstelsels vereis dat, of beperk word tot gevalle waar virtuele eiendom geïdentifiseer of erken word as saaklike regte? Die navorsing toon aan dat daar ʼn bepaalde konsep van virtuele eiendom is soos wat dit in virtuele wêrelde gevind word. Daar is ook ʼn merkbare ooreenkoms tussen die eiendomstelsels in die virtuele en regte wêrelde. Hierdie proefskrif bevind dat daar genoegsame regverdigingsgronde is (sosiaal, ekonomies, sowel as normatief) om regte wêreld-eiendomserkenning aan virtuele eiendom te verskaf. Alhoewel die funksie van eiendom dieselfde is in beide stelsels, word die ooreenkomste tussen hulle ondermyn deur die (algehele of amper algehele) tekort aan saaklike regte in die virtuele wêreld. Dit veroorsaak probleme, aangesien saaklike regte in die regte wêreld aansienlik sterker beskerming geniet as swakker persoonlike regte. Die redes vir hierdie tekort aan saaklike regte in ʼn virtuele wêreld is tweeledig. Eerstens veroorsaak die unieke aard van rekenaar-kode ʼn tekort aan saaklike regte binne die virtuele wêreld, aangesien die kode die bestaan van saaklike regte in meeste gevalle onnodig maak. Tweedens word meeste van die regte wat verkry word en bestaan in virtuele wêrelde geskep en gereguleer deur middel van kontrak. Daar word ook bevind dat dit moontlik is om aan virtuele eiendom erkenning en beskerming te gee deur middel van tradisionele privaatregtelike eiendom (beide Romeins-Germaans en Anglo-Amerikaans), konstitusionele eiendom en die strafreg. Strafreg kan egter slegs sekere gapings vul wat deur die tekort aan saaklike regte veroorsaak word. Die oorblywende regte sal egter persoonlike regte wees. In sekere omstandighede is dit moontlik dat hierdie persoonlike regte sterk genoeg sal wees, maar in ander gevalle sal dit nodig wees dat hul ondersteun word deur middel van die proklamasie van spesiale wetgewing wat swak persoonlike regte in die virtuele eiendom versterk tot eiendoms-agtige regte. In ander gevalle geniet hierdie regte beskerming deur die konstitusionele reg. In ander omstandighede sal dit egter verg dat erkenning en beskerming moet plaasvind deur die erkenning van saaklike regte in virtuele eiendom.
South African Research Chair in Property Law (sponsored by the Departement of Science and Technology (DST)
National Research Foundation (NRF)
University of Maastricht‟s Faculty of Law
Ius Commune Research School
Penner, J. E. "The idea of property in law." Thesis, University of Oxford, 1992. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.334275.
Full textHickey, R. W. J. "Property and the law of finders." Thesis, Queen's University Belfast, 2010. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.517346.
Full textSoepboer, Mick. "Libertarian views on intellectual property law." Master's thesis, University of Cape Town, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/4557.
Full textBooks on the topic "Property law"
Property law. 4th ed. Harlow, England: Longman, 2003.
Find full textPhillips, Jim. Property law. 2nd ed. Toronto]: Faculty of Law, University of Toronto, 2000.
Find full textProperty law. Dublin: Gill & Macmillan, 1995.
Find full textPhillips, Jim. Property law. Toronto]: Faculty of Law, University of Toronto, 1996.
Find full textKatz, Larissa. Property law. 2nd ed. Toronto]: Faculty of Law, University of Toronto, 2013.
Find full textDrassinower, Abraham. Property law. 2nd ed. Toronto]: Faculty of Law, University of Toronto, 2011.
Find full textPhillips, Jim. Property law. 2nd ed. Toronto]: Faculty of Law, University of Toronto, 2001.
Find full textPhillips, Jim. Property law. [Toronto]: Faculty of Law, University of Toronto, 1994.
Find full textPhillips, Jim. Property law. [Toronto]: Faculty of Law, University of Toronto, 1993.
Find full textSmith, Roger J. Property law. 7th ed. New York: Pearson Longman, 2011.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Property law"
Akkermans, Bram. "Property Law." In Introduction to Law, 79–108. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57252-9_5.
Full textDomingo, Rafael. "Property law." In Roman Law, 144–61. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2018.: Routledge, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781351111478-9.
Full textWaldron, Jeremy. "Property Law." In A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, 7–28. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444320114.ch1.
Full textSpurr, Stephen J. "Property law." In Economic Foundations of Law, 69–101. Third edition. | Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY:: Routledge, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781351239783-4.
Full textShapiro, Eric, David Mackmin, and Gary Sams. "Property law." In Modern Methods of Valuation, 37–56. Twelfth edition. | Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2019.: Estates Gazette, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781315145419-3.
Full textAkkermans, Bram. "Property Law." In Introduction to Law, 71–99. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06910-4_5.
Full textStasi, Alessandro. "Property Law." In General Principles of Thai Private Law, 183–219. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2191-6_4.
Full textBauman, Richard W. "Property Law." In Critical Legal Studies, 113–17. New York: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429044793-14.
Full textBayles, Michael D. "Property Law." In Principles of Law, 76–142. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3775-8_3.
Full textHuber, Wm Dennis. "Property and property law." In Corporate Law and the Theory of the Firm, 19–28. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2020. | Series: Routledge studies in the economics of legal relationships: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003019770-3.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Property law"
Dumas, Martin. "The missing link between property law and labour law." In XXVI World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy. Initia Via, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.17931/ivr2013_sws29_01.
Full textSuyunova, Z. M. "Doctrinal interpretation of property rights in civil law." In Scientific Trends: Law. ЦНК МОАН, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.18411/spc-20-05-2020-05.
Full textSadrieva, Rezida Ravilovna. "Escheated Property Passing Under The Law Into The Russian Federation'S Property." In International Scientific Congress «KNOWLEDGE, MAN AND CIVILIZATION». European Publisher, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2021.05.181.
Full textHeath, G. "European competition law and licensing agreements. Commentary on the new regulation." In Management and Exploitation of Intellectual Property Patent Rights. IEE, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/ic:20030286.
Full textGavrilina, YU A. "Reasons affecting the absence of changes in Russian property law." In Scientific Trends: Law. ЦНК МОАН, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.18411/spc-20-05-2020-06.
Full textTakahashi, Timothy T. "Intellectual Property Law and Legacy FORTRAN Code." In 2013 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference. Reston, Virginia: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-4210.
Full textIrish, V. "Intellectual property rights." In IEE Colloquium on `Principles of Law for Engineers and Managers'. IEE, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/ic:19961420.
Full textMaydanyk, Roman. "General provisions of digital property law: Categorizing digital assets." In 9th International e-Conference on Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences. Center for Open Access in Science, Belgrade - Serbia, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.32591/coas.e-conf.09.02011m.
Full textRozenfelds, Janis. "Property Rights Applicable to Immovable Property." In The 7th International Scientific Conference of the Faculty of Law of the University of Latvia. University of Latvia, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.22364/iscflul.7.2.32.
Full textJanković, Dijana. "DIFFERENT LEGAL ASPECTS OF THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS." In PROCEDURAL ASPECTS OF EU LAW. Faculty of Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.25234/eclic/6526.
Full textReports on the topic "Property law"
Correa, Carlos M. Intellectual Property and Competition Law. Geneva, Switzerland: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.7215/ip_ip_20080820.
Full textShavell, Steven. Economic Analysis of Property Law. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, May 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w9695.
Full textLevine, Ross. Law, Endowments, and Property Rights. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, August 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w11502.
Full textRuse â Khan, Henning Grosse. Sustainable Development In International Intellectual Property Law. Geneva, Switzerland: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.7215/ip_ip_20101011.
Full textMuller, Isabelle, Ian L. Pegg, Innocent Joseph, and Konstantin Gilbo. 2014 Enhanced LAW Glass Property-Composition Models, Phase 2. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), October 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1224467.
Full textFerreiro, Maria de Fátima. Land and Law: Reciprocal Rights and Duties in Private Property. DINÂMIA'CET-IUL, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.7749/dinamiacet-iul.wp.2006.55.
Full textBradford, David, and Kyle Logue. The Effects of Tax-Law Changes on Property-Casualty Insurance Prices. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, July 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w5652.
Full textAshley, Caitlyn, Elizabeth Spencer Berthiaume, Philip Berzin, Rikki Blassingame, Stephanie Bradley Fryer, John Cox, E. Samuel Crecelius, et al. Law and Policy Resource Guide: A Survey of Eminent Domain Law in Texas and the Nation. Edited by Gabriel Eckstein. Texas A&M University School of Law Program in Natural Resources Systems, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.37419/eenrs.eminentdomainguide.
Full textVienna, John D., Dong-Sang Kim, and Pavel R. Hrma. Database and Interim Glass Property Models for Hanford HLW and LAW Glasses. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), September 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/15003540.
Full textVienna, John, Alejandro Heredia-Langner, Scott Cooley, Aimee Holmes, Dong Sang Kim, and Nicholas Lumetta. Glass Property-Composition Models for Support of Hanford WTP LAW Facility Operation. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), March 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1862823.
Full text